Kitty Hawk 1/32 OS2U Kingfisher kit review.

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 4 сен 2024
  • 1/32 Kingfisher on a float.. what a beautiful model!! Another camera test. If you would like to contribute to the channel.. please look here.. / nigelsmodellingbench

Комментарии • 23

  • @darylsuess8990
    @darylsuess8990 3 года назад +2

    Killer camera Nigel, 2 thumbs up!! Cheers!

  • @Bob-ez3hb
    @Bob-ez3hb 3 года назад +3

    Hi Nigel, really enjoying your channel mate. Love your knowledge on the subjects and appreciate the time you take share it with us 👍

  • @greenoup1
    @greenoup1 3 года назад +2

    Hi Nigel, Good to see you're giving the new camera a work out.

  • @charliegrech8433
    @charliegrech8433 Год назад +1

    Oh wow Nigel just came across this love this kit and great review

  • @Andy.Gledhill.Models.
    @Andy.Gledhill.Models. 3 года назад +3

    Looks like a very nice kit. I prefer the look of the RAF version.

  • @johnkelly2098
    @johnkelly2098 3 года назад +5

    Looks delightful, Nigel. Looking forward to seeing the build some time at your leisure. There are a lot of videos on RUclips dealing with white balance. It'll be quicker having a watch of some of them rather than someone trying to write it all here.

  • @kipjackson6784
    @kipjackson6784 3 года назад +2

    Nigil, hello from USA and your audio is vastly improved with your new Sony camera. Bravo!

  • @MBCGRS
    @MBCGRS 3 года назад +4

    A pair of these aircraft are being restored to flying condition at Ardmore Airfield NZ...

  • @Looney2ing
    @Looney2ing 3 года назад +3

    Ugly but cool plane. Model looks top notch for what you paid. Sound was good only white balance needs adjusting. As you stated

  • @garywanamaker2602
    @garywanamaker2602 3 года назад +3

    There is a true Kitty Hawk problem if they haven't fixed the molds. When you go to install the rocker covers on the engine, you will need a left-hand and a right-hand that are mirror images. The supplied parts are all the same.

    • @NigelsModellingBench
      @NigelsModellingBench  3 года назад +2

      I'll check my sprues.. they corrected the MH- SH-60 moulds?

    • @garywanamaker2602
      @garywanamaker2602 3 года назад +3

      @@NigelsModellingBench hopefully they have. I have incorrect rockers and a short shot on the ignition ring, but I've had the kit for at least two years. Got discouraged just building the engine.

  • @robbroy
    @robbroy 3 года назад +3

    Hiya Nige another great review - new camera is looking sweet especially the fast focus 😊
    Got a question from a wee while back, I know you're a Buff buff (!), having seen your review of the GWH 1/144 B-52.. did you get a chance (or already have made a video) of the Academy 1/144 B-52?
    I'd be really interested to hear your thoughts in comparing the two - both new tool etc.
    I had the pleasure of seeing/inspecting a B-52 in person at the Avalon airshow a few years back (in Victoria, Australia). It flew in from Guam, and was the 'New World Order' beast.
    I've got a bunch of up-close photos and happy to share if you'd like.
    Cheers from Australia, Robbie.

    • @NigelsModellingBench
      @NigelsModellingBench  3 года назад +2

      Hi Robbie. The Academy kit has teardrop shaped wing tanks and the nose looks off to me.. so.. I wont be buying it I'm afraid.

    • @robbroy
      @robbroy 3 года назад +2

      @@NigelsModellingBench legend ~ that's decided it for me too. Cheers mate.!

  • @geordie_mech
    @geordie_mech 3 года назад +2

    What a difference a camera makes. So much better, Nigel. I have an opinion here. I don't understand the point in Reviewing a kit that is not easy to find from a company that are no longer producing kits.

    • @NigelsModellingBench
      @NigelsModellingBench  3 года назад +3

      Still available on Ebay....And as I said.. it is trying out the new camera.

  • @bobhupandown1471
    @bobhupandown1471 3 года назад +2

    🙏 please build a truck one day...a nice DAF XF ..please

  • @robertjensen1438
    @robertjensen1438 3 года назад +2

    Just a comment for the algorithm.