EMI 2005 Broadcast Camera ,1970

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 21 июл 2023
  • The EMI 2005 , 3 Tube Broadcast Camera was introduced in 1970 . It was used by the BBC , ITV Companies , ITN , NBN3 Newcastle Australia , CBC Vancouver Canada and VRT Belgium . These are the first tests after a long restoration.

Комментарии • 90

  • @TheTarrMan
    @TheTarrMan 3 месяца назад +9

    That old technology absolutely fascinates me. And to think of the intellect required to engineer such things. Generations of geniuses improving other geniuses work.

  • @video99couk
    @video99couk 4 месяца назад +9

    Wow. My misses thinks I'm nuts for owning a DigiBeta camcorder, but this is going to a whole different level.

  • @SO_DIGITAL
    @SO_DIGITAL 9 месяцев назад +16

    What a gorgeous and sharp picture!

  • @scott7305
    @scott7305 9 месяцев назад +26

    That is possibly one of the most sharpest analog cameras I’ve ever seen! And it’s from 1970?!

    • @Patrick_AUBRY
      @Patrick_AUBRY 8 месяцев назад

      Only 400 lines, a broadcast camera should resolve more then that 700 out of the CCU maybe?

    • @scott7305
      @scott7305 8 месяцев назад +1

      @@Patrick_AUBRY Well viewed natively on a good screen, or on a good analog-to-digital converter inside a tv, it will look much better than a cheap digital transfer.

    • @netowork3d
      @netowork3d 8 месяцев назад

      the problem at the time was analog transmission to the public...

    • @apryason
      @apryason 6 месяцев назад +6

      I'm going to guess that it is the British PAL standard vs. USA NTSC. PAL was developed after NTSC, and has more scan lines, sharper picture. I remember visiting Britain in the old days of analog TV and noticed the TVs had a better quality picture than the USA.

    • @k.m.1524
      @k.m.1524 6 месяцев назад +1

      Sony HDC-100, HDC-300, HDC-500, BTS KCH 1000 are also analog cameras with over 1000 lines. Additionally, there are Sony BVP-300, 330, 350, 360 tube cameras with more than 700 lines of resolution. Without listing other manufacturers.
      I believe that this camera is far from being the sharpest. Also, its registration cannot be compared to any of the mentioned cameras.

  • @jourwalis-8875
    @jourwalis-8875 29 дней назад +3

    When I built a TV-studio in 1973, the Sony black and white cameras had a resolution of 500 lines.....

    • @vintagevideo4044
      @vintagevideo4044  29 дней назад +2

      It's because, 400 lines , is 5Mhz of picture definition, which was the specification of the Pal transmission standard, so that's all it had to do . But I know what you mean about Sony cameras I have some late 3 tube ones and they will do 650 lines though the pal system connected direct to the monitor

  • @bob4analog
    @bob4analog 5 месяцев назад +6

    Wow, looks absolutely superb! Always liked the picture quality of the early 70s british tv.

  • @lowfinger
    @lowfinger 8 месяцев назад +8

    What a great picture this thing puts out, a really distinctive and familiar look to it.

  • @guimbadriver
    @guimbadriver Месяц назад +3

    EMI 2005 i have 3 full restored here in my collection in brazil they was from tv iguaçu canal 4 curitiba i restores all cameras with new transistor and new capacitors also 3 NOS plumbicon tubes the picture is superb with LED indoor lights in my test room

    • @vintagevideo4044
      @vintagevideo4044  Месяц назад +1

      Excellent, broadcast cameras , are a great, thing to collect

  • @MVVblog
    @MVVblog 4 месяца назад +3

    Superb! This is simply superb!

  • @brazilianbroadcastarchive
    @brazilianbroadcastarchive 6 месяцев назад +6

    This camera was used in the first color TV broadcast in Brazil on February 19, 1972, and was used by TV Difusora de Porto Alegre (today part of Rede Bandeirantes).

    • @vintagevideo4044
      @vintagevideo4044  5 месяцев назад +3

      Thanks for the information , it's always interesting to find out where EMI 2005 cameras were used

  • @SlapMehhh
    @SlapMehhh 2 месяца назад +7

    looks way better then anything digital, tube cameras create a fantasy asthetic to the image , digital is so dull and lifeless

  • @Patrick_AUBRY
    @Patrick_AUBRY 8 месяцев назад +3

    70's colours, priceless 😊

  • @SatellaNNW
    @SatellaNNW 8 месяцев назад +3

    08:32 What a amazing coollection! Excelent!🤩

  • @andyvan5692
    @andyvan5692 7 месяцев назад +2

    also with all those lights and knobs, a great 'canvas' for an Airwolf style startup sequence.

  • @erik61801
    @erik61801 3 месяца назад +1

    Thanks for sharing thats really neat.

  • @vh-tangoalphacharlie561
    @vh-tangoalphacharlie561 3 месяца назад +1

    Very interesting NBN 3 (Newcastle Australia) got a mention ... I learnt TV craft with a few of these - late 70's. Moved on to making hundreds of TV commercials for an Ad agency with them, but not behind the camera. With the right pedestal it was a great camera use. And the quality was amazing ...Thank you EMI

    • @vintagevideo4044
      @vintagevideo4044  3 месяца назад +2

      Thanks, it is now on a proper Vinten tripod

    • @vh-tangoalphacharlie561
      @vh-tangoalphacharlie561 3 месяца назад

      @@vintagevideo4044 - mate - you have the camera ... the support looks OK - just dont point it left or you'll break the window ! ?
      Find one of these - www.smecc.org/vinten/fulmar.jpg
      You have a piece of broadcasting history,
      Mitch

  • @antjarvis
    @antjarvis 5 месяцев назад +2

    That is a beauty 😍

  • @jourwalis-8875
    @jourwalis-8875 29 дней назад

    Nice picture quality.

  • @richardmattocks
    @richardmattocks 5 месяцев назад +2

    Beautiful bit of kit and impressive image quality, especially as (I assume) it’s optics and electronics are all from over 50 years ago! Sure older cameras were huge, but they had *style*.

    • @vintagevideo4044
      @vintagevideo4044  5 месяцев назад +1

      There are slightly larger colour cameras, they were made in about 1967 and had 4 tubes inside, 3 for red, green and blue, and one more for the luminance image. EMI made one called the 2001and Marconi made the Mk7. Both are bigger than the 2005

  • @Scar32
    @Scar32 Год назад +7

    idk if it's the room or the camera but it is oddly nostalgic, just get that feel from it you know

  • @Patrick_AUBRY
    @Patrick_AUBRY 8 месяцев назад +3

    I've tried an even older one (Sony NTSC) back in college 30 years ago. It took a long time on the morning to warm up to use the CCU. Matching it up with the current cameras of the day wasn't easy.

    • @vintagevideo4044
      @vintagevideo4044  8 месяцев назад +2

      It's probably some of the capacitors, low in value, having said that, both the the Sony BVP330ap cameras have had nothing done, one had a dirty contact on a toggle switch, that stopped it turning on

  • @carlstock
    @carlstock 3 месяца назад +1

    So interesting. Thank you! 8:51 Jurassic Park! :)

  • @jourwalis-8875
    @jourwalis-8875 29 дней назад

    Very nostalgic to me, who has worked with the Swedish Television Company. But not with this camera.....I think it was Ikegami three tube.....

  • @jahno7154
    @jahno7154 3 месяца назад +1

    The film footage reminds me of watching 70s TV shows The Sweeney and The Professionals 😃

  • @TheChrisBalcombe
    @TheChrisBalcombe 4 месяца назад +1

    That's a great camera

  • @gordonm2821
    @gordonm2821 4 месяца назад +1

    Blimey never heard of the 2005. I saw the 2001 at Elstree in 1990 but we mainly had the Link 110 and 125 at TV Centre before they moved to Thomson

  • @heavymetalnewsdesk
    @heavymetalnewsdesk 3 месяца назад +1

    Footage on the TV looks crisper than the footage filming it

  • @WhitfieldProductionsTV
    @WhitfieldProductionsTV 4 месяца назад +2

    "hey baby want to make a home movie" and my nerdy self would drag that into the bedroom and be like YEP! I know how to make ladies leave lol.

  • @andyp4727
    @andyp4727 Год назад +2

    Ive just acquired two complete 2005 camera chains which I want to restore, with auto centre units, all the cables including a load of different length TV81, shot boxes and focus, Variotel lenses and the operator control panels. I'm looking for manuals for these now, can you help at all ?

    • @vintagevideo4044
      @vintagevideo4044  Год назад +1

      The manuals are 4 large volumes, that would be to much to copy and even then I don't have everything that was published. I don't know where you are but there is a group that have set up a museum in the UK and they did offer to let me look at their manuals for them on site, but I managed to sort out all the faults, so did not take up their offer. But look at www.becg.tv

  • @GothGuy885
    @GothGuy885 8 месяцев назад +4

    very very interesting! 😀
    Amazing acquisition, not everyone can brag they have a TV camera from the BBC or any other broadcast camera for that matter! thanks for showing us the Innards also,
    are you / were you, a Tech /camera operator for BBC TV?
    a couple of the other camera's in your collection remind me of the one that Edison Carter carried around for network XXIII . in the Max Headroom Movie and series
    BTW what does the HOP position on the Normal/Hop toggle do?

    • @vintagevideo4044
      @vintagevideo4044  8 месяцев назад +3

      I am a video engineer. The Hop switch is for a latter type of plumbicon tube , that handles shiny things in the scene it's filming, a lot better, rather than tuning them into a bright blob, it shows the details better. The switch changes the way the circuit board scans the tube and if left in the wrong position can damage the tubes.

    • @GothGuy885
      @GothGuy885 8 месяцев назад +1

      @@vintagevideo4044 I remember on early 1960's 70's American black and white television shows, if a woman was was wearing a sequined dress it created a lot of little flares when the studio lights hit them just right, and also stripes in men's ties or jackets used to cause weird strobing effects.i guess that was also an issue with 1970's color TV camera's back in the day. thank you for the explanation, love your awesome television camera collection BTW 😀

  • @SO_DIGITAL
    @SO_DIGITAL 9 месяцев назад +4

    Would it be possible for you to have the raw feed in a video? Perhaps even present to the EMI?

    • @vintagevideo4044
      @vintagevideo4044  9 месяцев назад +1

      The camera control unit, gives our a RGB signal, that and be fed into a colour monitor, or the traditional way to do it , is feed the RGB into a PAL coder ,and turn it into PAL coded video. I use a coder made by COX electronics. The only signal the CCU can have fed into it , is viewfinder external video , from another camera or pattern generator , and that must have the same sync timing as the camera is running on, or the picture on the viewfinder is in the wrong position. It really only has the connections that were required at that time.

  • @jourwalis-8875
    @jourwalis-8875 29 дней назад

    A really tough job to adjust and register this camera! On todays modern CCD-camcorders you nearly have no controls at all! Everything can be done automatically!

  • @624linespal
    @624linespal 10 месяцев назад +1

    A magnificent effort to get this camera channel going. Can I ask where you got the camera channel from? And, were you involved in camera maintenance in your 'day job'.

    • @vintagevideo4044
      @vintagevideo4044  10 месяцев назад +1

      I am a video engineer, maintaining all sorts of equipment. The camera channel came from a camera man, who had saved it and another, many years ago, and finally decided to find them a new home

  • @BerlietGBC
    @BerlietGBC 3 месяца назад +1

    I have to say absolutely outstanding, to bring this camera back into operational condition is amazing, how many hours has this taken and where did you start

    • @vintagevideo4044
      @vintagevideo4044  3 месяца назад +2

      I generally start, with the power supply and see how good some capacitors are , if ok then power everything up and then, sort out the faults which are present until, I get a good picture, which can take a lot of hours

    • @BerlietGBC
      @BerlietGBC 3 месяца назад

      @@vintagevideo4044 I take my hat off to you patients, outstanding work
      I love seeing those devices brought back to life , so you have any Link Electronics cameras

  • @socksumi
    @socksumi 5 месяцев назад +1

    They still use huge cameras in broadcasting. They have look professional so size counts.

    • @psansom
      @psansom 4 месяца назад +1

      Most of the size is the lens. the smaller cameras normally sit in a frame to make them fit the lens and pedestal

    • @mikecumbo7531
      @mikecumbo7531 Месяц назад +1

      An amateur comment there.
      Take a look at a Sony HDC-2500 or 3500. They aren’t very big. Those camera bodies get put into a “sled” so the camera op can use a 100x or more piece of glass. The sled also gives the camera op a bigger viewfinder and also power and connections for a teleprompter if needed.

  • @netowork3d
    @netowork3d 8 месяцев назад +1

    👏

  • @jourwalis-8875
    @jourwalis-8875 29 дней назад

    What camera have you filmed this demonstration with?

  • @alyn1949
    @alyn1949 Год назад +1

    Have you got the shot box for this?

    • @vintagevideo4044
      @vintagevideo4044  Год назад +1

      Yes, it's combined with the focus control and it has 6 zoom presets and zoom preset speed control and a zoom angle meter

  • @jourwalis-8875
    @jourwalis-8875 29 дней назад

    Were is this from? Who owns a camera like this today? And has it any use? Is it more of a museum piece?

  • @sharefail
    @sharefail 3 месяца назад +1

    I've always wondered if these old broadcast cameras match DVD quality or excel it?

    • @vintagevideo4044
      @vintagevideo4044  3 месяца назад +1

      The main thing with camera picture quality, is how good are the pick up tubes, this camera has a very good set of tubes, so with careful set up, it can give a picture quality, that almost matches a DVD

  • @soufmaro502
    @soufmaro502 8 месяцев назад +1

    insteresting i assume the test image is a PPI/DPI scale, and it dont show texture for 500 +
    up to 400 is shown

    • @vintagevideo4044
      @vintagevideo4044  8 месяцев назад +1

      The test chart is a Marconi Resolution Chart No 1 , and in this case also marked EEV, which is English Electric Valve, and used from about 1965 , all the early colour cameras in the UK and other countries , always stated the modulation depth at 400 lines , so a good 400 line performance is what they aimed for. 400 lines is 5MHz in vision bandwidth. The chart does go up to 800 lines, which was for some black and white cameras that could do more, so 800 lines is 10MHz , some of my late Sony 3 ccd standard definition 4/3 cameras will just about do 700 lines on the chart

  • @maxasaurus3008
    @maxasaurus3008 5 месяцев назад +1

    One of your gadgets (oscilloscope maybe) said Marconi on it! 🤯

    • @vintagevideo4044
      @vintagevideo4044  5 месяцев назад +2

      It's a Marconi Mk5 picture and waveform monitor. It has a re gunned monitor tube, which was done many years ago and still as good as new

    • @binarybox.binarybox
      @binarybox.binarybox Месяц назад +1

      @@vintagevideo4044 We , in Manchester, used many Marconi Mk5 picture and waveform monitors .... ended up using Marconi Mk 9 cameras in all the studios.

  • @l3gacyb3ta21
    @l3gacyb3ta21 8 месяцев назад +1

    Ah, looks like the Cars 2 one :>

  • @theeditorgareth
    @theeditorgareth 6 месяцев назад +1

    Have you had any 2001s working? I sold my 2001 head to a chap who had assistance to get one of his working in about 2009 - anything to do with yourself?

    • @vintagevideo4044
      @vintagevideo4044  6 месяцев назад +1

      I have no 2001 cameras yet, but am looking for one, to restore

    • @theeditorgareth
      @theeditorgareth 6 месяцев назад

      Hi. I know someone who owns a number of 2001s and would be keen to make contact - is there a way for him to drop you a line?@@vintagevideo4044

  • @fredjohnson6077
    @fredjohnson6077 9 месяцев назад +1

    do you have one of these for sale?

    • @vintagevideo4044
      @vintagevideo4044  9 месяцев назад +1

      Sadly not

    • @vintagevideo4044
      @vintagevideo4044  9 месяцев назад +1

      There is one of these for sale , it's expensive, if you are interested then, send me a message on vintagevideo82@gmail.com

    • @vintagevideo4044
      @vintagevideo4044  5 месяцев назад +1

      Please note, the 2005 camera is now sold to another collector

    • @fredjohnson6077
      @fredjohnson6077 5 месяцев назад

      Hello, did you advertise the sale? - I enquired about this four months ago - will you be able to let me know about items in the future for sale?@@vintagevideo4044

    • @fredjohnson6077
      @fredjohnson6077 5 месяцев назад

      how much did it go for?@@vintagevideo4044

  • @Taras-Nabad
    @Taras-Nabad 3 месяца назад +1

    Must have cost a fortune in 1970.

    • @vintagevideo4044
      @vintagevideo4044  3 месяца назад

      Probably over £50k

    • @Taras-Nabad
      @Taras-Nabad 3 месяца назад +1

      @@vintagevideo4044 Right, so in 1970's money much more than an average home.

    • @vintagevideo4044
      @vintagevideo4044  3 месяца назад +1

      Yes, not many manufacturers ever published prices.

  • @adelaideautowashes
    @adelaideautowashes 8 месяцев назад +1

    What a great piece of technology and engineering. Judging by its name, is the 2005 the smaller version of the EMI 2001?

    • @vintagevideo4044
      @vintagevideo4044  8 месяцев назад +1

      Yes it is , about half of the circuit boards are the same or very similar

  • @briansaiditsoitmustbetrue4206
    @briansaiditsoitmustbetrue4206 8 месяцев назад +1

    Superb ..Do you have any EMI-20001 cameras in your vast collection?

    • @vintagevideo4044
      @vintagevideo4044  8 месяцев назад +1

      Not at the moment, but hopefully I will, one day

  • @seamusellis1450
    @seamusellis1450 5 месяцев назад +1

    Only ever used by the BBC in their Manchester studios. By all accounts the picture was vastly inferior to that from the 2001.

  • @notsogreat123
    @notsogreat123 Месяц назад

    They spelled color wrong