Building a 3D Scanner Turntable: Advanced Photogrammetry Agisoft Metashape

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 18 окт 2024

Комментарии • 259

  • @toyotaboyhatman
    @toyotaboyhatman 5 лет назад +17

    WOW! this is the first time I've seen a hobby photogrammetry rig actually produce good results. I am so building this and buying metashape.

  • @workingTchr
    @workingTchr Год назад +1

    Keeping the object and lights stationary is key as you've shown. I'm going to try a poor person's version with a large foam core cutout circle as my guide for positioning each 10 degree shot. Very encouraged by your success with this.

  • @liambaldacchino8495
    @liambaldacchino8495 5 лет назад +6

    This is exactly what I was considering when talking to a friend. Good to see that the lazy Susan bearing is a viable option. I’ll definitely be looking at this as a point of reference for my own, unsure on scale yet but with an adjustable arm for the camera this will be incredible! Thanks for sharing!!!

  • @zandorius
    @zandorius 3 года назад +1

    Im impressed you get such good results without making a dense point cloud first

  • @makermatrix9815
    @makermatrix9815 5 лет назад +6

    I had a similar idea independently a couple months ago. Absolutely awesome to see your execution. Definitely need to make my way through the rest of your library, loving it so far ;-)

  • @JohnJones-oy3md
    @JohnJones-oy3md 5 лет назад +3

    Add a few stepper motors, remote shutter release, and a microcontroller and the whole process could be pretty well automated. I am so amazed/enthused about the advances in photogrammetry and desktop machining in the last 10-15 years. Wonderful times we live in.

    • @EricStrebel
      @EricStrebel  5 лет назад +1

      John Jones yeah, that would be pretty cool, above my skill set, but it would make a good collaboration vid with someone with those skills for V2.

    • @lukefrahn8538
      @lukefrahn8538 5 лет назад

      @@EricStrebel Incidentally, I work at a tech startup that deals with robotics and image processing. My engineering co-workers think this could be done with

  • @lukefrahn8538
    @lukefrahn8538 5 лет назад +12

    Heya Eric. Thanks so much for trying this out. I think my ideas are pretty brilliant too, but to see a great industrial designer prototype one has simply made my day. Cheers!

    • @EricStrebel
      @EricStrebel  5 лет назад +1

      @Luke Frahn Awesome! thanks for your comment and support.

    • @apmgold
      @apmgold 3 года назад +1

      Hey Luke,Eric is standing on your shoulders with this video. Nice of you to plant the seed in his head. All in all a nice collaboration, well done guys. 👍

  • @jimgeorge6220
    @jimgeorge6220 4 года назад +2

    A couple of weeks ago I made a turn table setup very similar to what you've made. It works well. I think these setups are a very good answer for small items.

    • @EricStrebel
      @EricStrebel  4 года назад

      Good to hear, thanks for you feedback and support

  • @angelo3d
    @angelo3d 5 лет назад +2

    angelo3d
    1 segundo atrás
    Hello, sir. Here in Brazil everithing is very expensive. This solution you presented is 100% efficient. It owes nothing to commercial and so expensive devices. Thank you for sharing your knowledge.

  • @topbadgun
    @topbadgun 4 года назад +1

    When i read the description, i just realise i'm not talent nor ressourcesful.
    Thanks for share your workflow, really impressive.

  • @DenisGerbassi
    @DenisGerbassi 5 лет назад +2

    Hi, Eric, I did one of this for my dental office projects. I put 4300k and 6k lights beside and above the center of that to improvel the lighting and put a green cardboard instead of white behind it. Nice job!

    • @EricStrebel
      @EricStrebel  5 лет назад +1

      Denis Gerbassi de Oliveira I think lighting is key to making this all work. it could definitely work with green background as well, I can see it working as a green screen effect too.

  • @arrangemonk
    @arrangemonk 5 лет назад +3

    never seen someone so patient with the bandsaw before

    • @EricStrebel
      @EricStrebel  5 лет назад +3

      Anton Konrad My boy is just starting out, so he is being ultra careful while the old man watches. Good for him, take his time and be safe! Glad you like the vid and commented, feel free to share on social media.

  • @gregoryjohnson3627
    @gregoryjohnson3627 Год назад +1

    I actually made something similar to this for curing resin prints. I took a lazy Susan and put a circle of wood on it. Then I attached a synchronous motor out of a microwave to it to rotate slowly. Works pretty good for photogrammetry too

  • @mrbob92679
    @mrbob92679 3 года назад

    WOW I'm a newbie to this photogrammetry and having racking my brain on why my image of a white plastic 1/16 scale car body does not reproduce. I think I need to build me one of these tables verses trying to walk around it. What a great experiment that you did in making this.
    Thanks for the time and effort. Look forward to seeing more of your videos and will have to subscribe.

  • @jafinch78
    @jafinch78 2 года назад +1

    Great upgrade from the Ben Heck Element 13 build he did. Re-visiting this from when you first made and thinking I might do this in a maybe easier to disassemble design, albeit yours can be unscrewed as well with maybe some toothpicks or scrap wood if the woodscrew holes require. Thanks for sharing! Awesome design work!

  • @plog1805
    @plog1805 2 года назад +6

    What can save a lot of time and can take up to 11,000 pictures per rotation is a computer-controlled photography turntable. Iconasys makes 6 different sized turntables (1.5lbs-500lbs.). Set however many images and angles you want. Iconasys automatically removes the background on each image too.

    • @EricStrebel
      @EricStrebel  2 года назад +1

      Sounds cool, have them send one over so I can test it out

  • @veropag1850
    @veropag1850 5 лет назад +4

    thank you for building this, it proves what i thought and i'll have to make myself a rig like that for doing 3d scans

  • @Madara2B
    @Madara2B Год назад

    I like turning the object it's self around, and keeping the camera stationary. I just use a lazy susan. Cool rig, these things can cost 500$ when manufactured so good on you for having the skills to make it your self.

  • @mikepostma7036
    @mikepostma7036 4 года назад +1

    Hi! Next step would be to add automation! Instead of rotating the whole rig, you could the middle using a dc motor and arduino! Attaching a light to the camera would also allow for a lighting constant! Love the video!

    • @EricStrebel
      @EricStrebel  4 года назад +1

      Agreed, I just have no electronics skills like that

  • @gilberto_designer
    @gilberto_designer 2 года назад +1

    WOWderful!!! I love it very much!! Great!!

  • @ytSuns26
    @ytSuns26 5 лет назад +2

    I built this rig only the model moves, I have three set positions on the camera support arc. Yes I choose ten degrees as well. Love the device , much better, easier. Great video,

  • @garagemonkeysan
    @garagemonkeysan 5 лет назад +2

    Wow even pulled in the surface texture. Great video. : )

    • @EricStrebel
      @EricStrebel  5 лет назад

      @garagemonkeysan it shows the part line on the bottle as well. Thanks for the reply.

  • @MrHeretic666
    @MrHeretic666 3 года назад +2

    Great one. I'm thinking of how to rotate camera around object and not vice versa right now. And found your video. All good, but I think this sheet on background rotating with rig may cause some problems 'cause lighting isn't consistent with it.

  • @cecilomar
    @cecilomar 2 дня назад

    I'm researching how to make my own rig for the same, and maybe some photography. I've been thinking about using 2020 aluminum extrusions and adding one of the Nema 17 steppers that I have laying around the shop. I wanted to see if this was possible, and you just (5 years ago) confirmed it. Thank you.

  • @coulterjb22
    @coulterjb22 5 лет назад +2

    Excellent video.
    I'm going to try the software out. So far my experience has been fair at best with other programs, but I'm sure my iPhone XR is the biggest issue. I'll report back.

  • @astbrnrd
    @astbrnrd 5 лет назад +4

    🤔 The added back-drop would help to mitigate the noise induced to the images by stray reflection. Plus there would be a lot less to edit out from the scan.
    Nice build though 😊

  • @s6xafterse7en
    @s6xafterse7en 4 года назад +1

    Nice, I built something similar 4 years ago... it’s bigger but same principle!

  • @ew7007
    @ew7007 4 года назад +8

    Hi, Eric. I am also Eric. Thank you for this great video. I am exploring photogrammetry for 3d modeling and printing. Just one question though... Have you ever seen a picture of someone getting their hair caught in a piece of machinery? It is not pretty and depending on the machine it can be fatal. Please have your helpers adopt basic shop safety if you are going to include them in YT videos. It is the responsible community member thing to do. Ok, lecture over. Thanks!

    • @EricStrebel
      @EricStrebel  4 года назад +2

      Thanks! I appreciate your concern.

  • @Tres-D
    @Tres-D 3 года назад +2

    Thank you for sharing. Why you dont use a lazy susan to turn the object to be scanned insted of rating the camera? I use it this way and it works, uses less space etc, etc. Just want to learn the bennefits. Best regards, and thank you for sharing

    • @EricStrebel
      @EricStrebel  3 года назад

      The software would not work with that setup

    • @Tres-D
      @Tres-D 3 года назад

      @@EricStrebel yes IT does

  • @daasfaas1116
    @daasfaas1116 Год назад

    Hi, fantastic result for so cheap solution
    Can you tell me which software you use, pls?

  • @StefSis
    @StefSis 3 года назад +2

    This is amazing! You rock!

  • @lensseteam
    @lensseteam 4 года назад +3

    Hi Eric, thanks for project..but i m confused of stationary turntable and rotating the camera? What is the difference ? Why we didnt rotate the object instead of camera?what is the point? Thanks again

    • @EricStrebel
      @EricStrebel  4 года назад

      This software works better this way

    • @plog1805
      @plog1805 2 года назад

      What can save a lot of time and can take up to 11,000 pictures per rotation is a computer-controlled photography turntable. Iconasys makes 6 different sized turntables (1.5lbs-500lbs.). Set however many images and angles you want. Automatically removes the background on each image too. www.iconasys.com

  • @facelessfan
    @facelessfan 2 года назад +1

    Very nice. Thank you for the video. Have you ever made or know of any plans for a motorized, slow moving lazy susan that can support a human for 3d scanning?

    • @EricStrebel
      @EricStrebel  2 года назад +1

      Nope, but that would be handy. I would like one

    • @facelessfan
      @facelessfan 2 года назад

      @@EricStrebel well if you ever come upon plans/instructions for this please let me know. Thanks again. I love your content!! Have a great day.

    • @plog1805
      @plog1805 2 года назад

      Iconasys

  • @nadirsaidi8548
    @nadirsaidi8548 4 года назад +1

    Nice work thanks 👍👍👌

  • @AdrianMelia-0
    @AdrianMelia-0 3 года назад +1

    I like how you got the thread for the cap. That illustrates the quality of the resolution. Did you take measurements to establish the accuracy?

  • @steffiheaven8738
    @steffiheaven8738 4 года назад +3

    Hey its a pretty cool project and I liked the way how you did it. I was wondeing if you have any problems scanning Objects which have a uneven bottom. Because your camera is only in one spot. I was thinking if you move the kamera from the top to the middle and then to the bottom, then you might get a better outcome. What do you think of that?

    • @EricStrebel
      @EricStrebel  4 года назад

      camera moves, three times actually, yes, you will have a problem on the bottom, you need to figure that out depending on the object and your priorities for your project.

  • @Rexik
    @Rexik 3 года назад +13

    Unconstrained long hair in the workspace makes my heart go superfast

  • @NirmalenduPaul
    @NirmalenduPaul 3 года назад +1

    Wow.. that's supercool

  • @ahmadaisabry
    @ahmadaisabry 5 лет назад +1

    Nice work. I had my design idea since two years. The arc which is carrying the camera is near quarter of a circle which goes from -15 degree to 80. But instead the rig is rotating around the subject . The subject sets over a turn table and turns around its axis which is much easier . And the subjects sets inside a lighting box which diffuses the light. Which is necessary for quality photogrammetry.k

    • @EricStrebel
      @EricStrebel  5 лет назад +1

      I would love to see it please post a picture on social media and tag @botzendesign so I can see how you diffuse the light

    • @ahmadaisabry
      @ahmadaisabry 5 лет назад +1

      @@EricStrebel The issue that I am not using social media to share. But I can send you the design I made for it.

  • @Bala92635
    @Bala92635 3 года назад

    Very good creativity.. sir can you please tell me what is that rotating plates

  • @jeromesagnard867
    @jeromesagnard867 4 года назад

    WOW, Beautifull result, i make this 3D scanner Eric TurnTable.

  • @IS3DM
    @IS3DM 3 года назад +1

    Good work!

  • @AhmadShahwaiz
    @AhmadShahwaiz 3 года назад +2

    What color should be ideal of the whole rig? Like white? Black or brown etc?

    • @EricStrebel
      @EricStrebel  3 года назад

      Dunno

    • @AhmadShahwaiz
      @AhmadShahwaiz 3 года назад

      Because white would reflect light and it can cause issue

  • @franciswhite8438
    @franciswhite8438 3 года назад +1

    Really cool stuff! just a guess, do the background create different shadows while is turning?doesn't affect it?

  • @gazed1435
    @gazed1435 6 месяцев назад

    Great video what software you using :)

  • @PeterLunk
    @PeterLunk 5 лет назад +4

    I make a hires video while going around the object.
    Then extract frames from every 0.5 sec of my video then use those to make the photogrammetry.
    Works fast and great :)

    • @EricStrebel
      @EricStrebel  5 лет назад +1

      I like that, what software do you use?

    • @PeterLunk
      @PeterLunk 5 лет назад +2

      @@EricStrebel I use a small free program to extract images from video. But the one i use now had a lot of spam and sale stuff in it and I reccomend you find your own.
      After that I use either Mesroom or Autodesk Recap to make the photogrammetry from the image collection.
      Autodesk Fusion 3d or Blender to clean the model up etc.
      Sincerely PL.

    • @PeterLunk
      @PeterLunk 5 лет назад +1

      @@EricStrebel It even works fast enough to make pretty good photogrammetries of (bald headed) persons :)
      As the person does not have to sit still much longer then 2 to 3 minutes, instead of 15 to 30 minutes for handmade pictures.
      PL.

    • @PeterLunk
      @PeterLunk 5 лет назад

      @@EricStrebel Try it ;)

    • @EricStrebel
      @EricStrebel  5 лет назад +1

      Peter Lunk thanks for sharing very much appreciated Thanks for your support

  • @mylesjarvis7571
    @mylesjarvis7571 2 года назад +1

    This is very impressive! I’d like to be able to make something like this for making 3d images of an r/c jet I have. The problem I have is the size of the plane and also I’d need to shoot from underneath as well. Are there any recommendations for suspending the subject but using a rig like this?

  • @karljay7473
    @karljay7473 3 года назад +1

    I took a tossed out microwave and pulled all the parts that I could. Got a motorized table out of it and now I need to make a mount for it. It's free and those microwave turn tables are really strong. Now I'm looking to setup the lights and camera. It's for eBay listings and 3D model making.

    • @MrMikedejeuner
      @MrMikedejeuner 3 года назад

      somehow it didnt work for me, the camera really has to ''move'' around the object to translate it in 3d correctly I guess

    • @karljay7473
      @karljay7473 3 года назад

      @@MrMikedejeuner I'm not sure how you built your system, but I'm a software dev and I was doing an iPhone scan before Lidar and it was an older phone. It needed feedback for all the things it got and took a while to get the details. One of the key things is that it has to be able to know what side it's currently doing, in order to put things in order. Kinda like a single die, you have sides that are all different because they have a different number of dots on them. I've never built my own scanning system, but I'd guess it would need to be a slow turn and hitting different angles would probably help too. I think it's the background that matters. Maybe the phone knows more about where it is when you move it.

  • @rabnawaz3347
    @rabnawaz3347 2 года назад +1

    Very goooood

  • @adeadegoke4925
    @adeadegoke4925 Год назад +1

    Amazing

  • @admiralevan
    @admiralevan 4 года назад +1

    Love it man, great stuff

  • @6962943
    @6962943 3 года назад +1

    Wow awsome

  • @dendee1474
    @dendee1474 4 года назад +1

    HI Eric, I'm not sure if someone already ask you the same question.
    If you make the object and lighting turn together instead of the camera and the background, will there be a difference?

    • @EricStrebel
      @EricStrebel  4 года назад +1

      Read the comments to find out why

  • @stephenstrebel8165
    @stephenstrebel8165 5 лет назад +2

    Great result for prototype..
    maybe make simple fixed light mount on boom would take it 1 more step..

    • @erek200
      @erek200 5 лет назад +2

      Lol, are you his brother?

    • @califuturist
      @califuturist 3 года назад

      That’s correct. There will be shadows if there is no light at the camera’s position.

  • @TheBlackScope
    @TheBlackScope 3 года назад +1

    man I love your vids holy

    • @EricStrebel
      @EricStrebel  3 года назад

      Thanks for the comment and support, much appreciated. Feel free to share on social media

    • @TheBlackScope
      @TheBlackScope 3 года назад

      @@EricStrebel I actually already started the drawings and plans you really inspired me. I'm doing it a little different tho, thinking about using a bike wheel fixed on a metal surface as a base. I dont have much tools so that might be easier for me

    • @TheBlackScope
      @TheBlackScope 3 года назад

      @@EricStrebel also what would you recommend to create a dimmed uniform light in a room so the lighting doesnt create any not wanted shadows, for best results

    • @TheBlackScope
      @TheBlackScope 3 года назад

      @@EricStrebel Oh i just realize you said you have used diffusers in another video. yeah, thats a good way I guess. Thank you !

  • @texasRoofDoctor
    @texasRoofDoctor 4 года назад

    Nice work, Man.

  • @DisneyFantasyToys
    @DisneyFantasyToys 5 лет назад +1

    This is great! Glad I have seen this. Now you can make free high res 3D scans for almost free instead of buying an expensive 3D scanner. This result is the same as an expensive 3D scanner of 3000 dollar or more. One question. Do you think it is possible to scan larger objects of about 1 meter, or 1.5 m ?

  • @pengpengli7700
    @pengpengli7700 5 лет назад +1

    Wonderful try!! Do you need to masking each of the photos before alignment, or you direct align those photos. Thank you!

    • @EricStrebel
      @EricStrebel  5 лет назад

      I don't have to do anything the software takes care of it no post-processing of the photos required on my end

    • @pengpengli7700
      @pengpengli7700 5 лет назад +1

      @@EricStrebel how do you remove the whiteboard background on Photoscan? change the bounding box or?

    • @EricStrebel
      @EricStrebel  5 лет назад

      the software does some how.

  • @Jet_Cat
    @Jet_Cat 3 года назад +1

    it works !!!

  • @SongZee
    @SongZee 5 лет назад +1

    What I found to work best for me is to rotate the object itself, the final texture comes out uniformly lit on the entire surface, this way the object can be accurately lit in the 3d engine. Just a simple turntable used by cake shops, and the camera set on a tripod at different heights

    • @EricStrebel
      @EricStrebel  5 лет назад

      What software supports that? Most do not....

    • @SongZee
      @SongZee 5 лет назад

      @@EricStrebel I used RealityCapture ruclips.net/video/d3DA2jB2nQE/видео.html

    • @thomaserikssen4792
      @thomaserikssen4792 5 лет назад

      @Song Zee: Your result is impressive. Did you motorize the turntable, or manually spin it in increments? Any photos or footage of how your process goes? Also, I'm curious why you mentioned you had to do different heights with the camera+tripod...

    • @DenisVFX2
      @DenisVFX2 3 года назад

      I have the same idea, why rotate camera, it’s easier to rotate object itself. If the lighting is ambient and close to constant the result should be fine…

    • @EricStrebel
      @EricStrebel  3 года назад

      The software does not work that way

  • @rodrigojager
    @rodrigojager 5 лет назад +2

    What if you add a chessboard background instead of a white one, so the machine can compare it and make some calculations? Does the software allows you to manually or through script, telling what is the position/angle of the picture? So if you are using a stepmotor, you can tell the software exactly how many degrees you turn in each picture. What about placing some line lasers and taking the pictures in a isometric view, so you can calculate the distance from the red curvy line projected on the surface to the turning axis (like in a solid of revolution, where you have the line of each degree that will spin).?

    • @EricStrebel
      @EricStrebel  5 лет назад +1

      Rodrigo Jäger I have no idea, reach out to the software manufacturer, as far as I can tell it figures all that out by itself, watch my most recent scanning video here for more insight. ruclips.net/video/b1t33KcBlnk/видео.html

    • @rodrigojager
      @rodrigojager 5 лет назад

      As far as I am aware, it uses artificial intelligence comparing features from the 3D object and from the background to process how one picture connects to the other. That is why I believe having some sort of background, but still easy to differentiate from the object itself would help. Your result is amazing already, I was just wondering if you can combine this technology with others like counting known steps or tracing projected laser lines to pixels in some sort of triangulation and high order linear regression would improve the results for more situations. We know for instance that if the reflection of the light is not perfect due to refractions in materials like glasses or reflections in shinning objects, it would not be that good. So maybe it is possible to improve it with low cost technology and getting a quality better than some high cost solutions...

  • @ryanloft4534
    @ryanloft4534 3 года назад +1

    Have you built a final version using good materials as you mentioned or does this proof serve you well?

    • @EricStrebel
      @EricStrebel  3 года назад

      Nope have not built anything beyond what you see in the video this is working pretty good

    • @plog1805
      @plog1805 2 года назад

      What can save a lot of time and can take up to 11,000 pictures per rotation is a computer-controlled photography turntable. Iconasys makes 6 different sized turntables (1.5lbs-500lbs.). Set however many images and angles you want. Automatically removes the background on each image too. www.iconasys.com

  • @adamfilip
    @adamfilip 2 года назад

    When you use backboard it will reflect light onto the object which will make the lighting change as you rotate

    • @EricStrebel
      @EricStrebel  2 года назад

      Hmmm, perhaps but not enough to disport the scan of the object it appears, so should be good

  • @kevinm3751
    @kevinm3751 5 лет назад +1

    Fantastic idea!

  • @edslatt3845
    @edslatt3845 4 года назад +1

    Love this video!
    Would you be willing to share your dataset?
    I'd love to prove out the software tool chain before making the effort to build the gantry

    • @EricStrebel
      @EricStrebel  4 года назад

      Well, I don’t have the data set anymore to share it’s rather large anyway it would be difficult

  • @error079
    @error079 5 лет назад +2

    Excellent! I thought it would not work without tracking pattern between turntable and item to scan. Maybe the rough plywood provided enough of a pattern to track.

    • @EricStrebel
      @EricStrebel  5 лет назад +1

      error079 Yeah, I was pretty surprised as well, I will reach out to Agisoft and see what they say and get their thoughts as well.

    • @lukefrahn8538
      @lukefrahn8538 5 лет назад

      When I played around with this photogrammetry stuff several years ago I found benefit from placing coloured tracking dots on the surface the object was sitting on.

    • @califuturist
      @califuturist 3 года назад

      @@lukefrahn8538
      There’s also photogrammetry spray you can use. It’s expensive though.

  • @KirstyTube
    @KirstyTube 4 года назад

    Wow that's quite impressive!
    I'm working on an auto shoot that rotates the object with a stationary camera but I doubt I will get results anywhere this good :/

  • @user-ml3nf2xn6o
    @user-ml3nf2xn6o 3 года назад

    hi, l really good watching your video.
    and I have a question.
    May I know the name of the tool that supports the camera? For example camera rails.
    l really wait ur answer

  • @MehmetKozal
    @MehmetKozal 4 года назад +1

    Great one man.

  • @stevenrusch6341
    @stevenrusch6341 3 года назад +1

    OMG, imagine if WarCraft had it this way for modding and skinning!!

  • @pjanoo6973
    @pjanoo6973 5 лет назад +2

    Is lighting that important? would it be helpful to have top lighting to simulate mid day to avoid shadows

    • @EricStrebel
      @EricStrebel  5 лет назад

      Yes apparently light is important in photography and it needs to be has diffused as possible with the setup.

  • @Konradulations
    @Konradulations 4 года назад +2

    what would be the difference if I rotate the object instead of the camera?

    • @EricStrebel
      @EricStrebel  4 года назад +1

      Probably will not work with this software

    • @Konradulations
      @Konradulations 4 года назад

      @@EricStrebel ok thanks for the reply. Did you try your setup but witout the background? If so it would be interesting if the result is better but i guess if you build this kind of kamera rig attaching a plain baclground to the other side is the least amount of work...

  • @dbldzo
    @dbldzo 4 года назад

    Greetings Eric. So glad I found this video and the way of using lazy Susan. I do have some questions though, and if it's possible some kind of modifications to this model. The issue with my model is that, well, it's a full size mannequin with old ethnological outfit. I need to create a small printed 3D model from the mannequin, something like palm-sized model, using of course the method of photogrammetry.
    I was thinking of placing my DSLR on a tripod and use additional studio lights which are controlled by a trigger from the DSLR. Then, placing the mannequin over a lazy Susan base (made from something more sturdy than a plywood, probably steel lazy Susan), and using the same technique like you - rotating every 10 degrees for a full circle. The background is going to be white canvas (used for photoshoots of real models) made as infinity wall (without a corner behind the mannequin)
    My dilemma - is this way of rotating is efficient and reliable? I'm going to use the same light and photo settings, and there aren't any glossy or transparent surfaces. Thank you.

    • @califuturist
      @califuturist 3 года назад

      Yes, the subject on a lazy susan will work too. Make sure to take 36 shots each from ~10’ high, mid height and low height, trying not to change the distance from the subject.

  • @coulterjb22
    @coulterjb22 5 лет назад

    Eric, did you use the standard version of the software or the professional?
    And did you check to see how well it captured the true size of the object it scanned (the standard version you have to manually play with scaling to get it close).

    • @EricStrebel
      @EricStrebel  5 лет назад

      I have a licensed copy of the software, scale is not relevant for me, have no idea what scale it is is once it's done, I just scale it to what I need.

  • @markh2005
    @markh2005 4 года назад

    This was really cool, thanks! have you taken it further?

  • @cdentista10
    @cdentista10 5 лет назад +1

    very good !

  • @3D_Printing
    @3D_Printing 5 лет назад +26

    2:56 Be careful of Hair getting caught up in blades, etc...
    Seen this happen to someone using a drill, not very nice

    • @drxym
      @drxym 4 года назад

      The minute I saw that I thought "that's a scalping".

    • @markh2005
      @markh2005 4 года назад

      Tie that hair back if you wanna keep it!

    • @LandiTwilight
      @LandiTwilight 3 года назад

      @MetalArtDesign Schreilechner q

  • @abhinavsivakumar6403
    @abhinavsivakumar6403 5 лет назад +2

    Would rotating the object instead of the camera work if my lighting is diffuse and I put distinguishing marks on the rotating base?

    • @EricStrebel
      @EricStrebel  5 лет назад

      Try and see if it works, possibly it might

    • @euclidallglorytotheloglady5500
      @euclidallglorytotheloglady5500 4 года назад

      At first I thought it might be possible, but I don't think so.
      Say you used the same object Eric did, I think in your version the end result would be a model that was cylindrical with the features of widest edges.

    • @plog1805
      @plog1805 2 года назад

      What can save a lot of time and can take up to 11,000 pictures per rotation is a computer-controlled photography turntable. Iconasys makes 6 different sized turntables (1.5lbs-500lbs.). Set however many images and angles you want. Automatically removes the background on each image too. www.iconasys.com

  • @cedricpod
    @cedricpod 5 лет назад +2

    so my spin of your wonderful ideas is the following ........ DSLR camera that is remotely triggered. Camera is attached to a fixed robot arm that moves to appropriate angles . Object rotates on turntable controlled by stepper motor. Diffused LED lighting rotates with the object. System is shielded from stray light ( darkroom ? )

    • @EricStrebel
      @EricStrebel  5 лет назад

      I like your spin, but who's going to design and build all that extra stuff it's just not worth it for me for occasional use.

    • @cedricpod
      @cedricpod 5 лет назад

      Eric Strebel .......i can definitely see your point

  • @gordoncouger9648
    @gordoncouger9648 2 года назад +1

    Given a choice I always turned the subject rather than circle it with the camera. I think it is easier to maintain uniform lighting and a great deal faster as there is less time between images.

    • @EricStrebel
      @EricStrebel  2 года назад

      This software works best with this set up

  • @Ciupremo
    @Ciupremo 5 лет назад

    Idea was good! But maybe it was easier to put a rotating table and fix the camera so the object is just there, at the same height within 0.5 mm difference.
    With that long arm holding the camera, there's a momentum that moves a little up and a little down the camera.
    Another tip, you could use a remote app to shoot photos avoiding any micro-movements.
    And... last but not least, adding a flat egg timer under the table, could automate the rotation so the only action would be press the "Shoot" button on the smartphone :)))
    Btw nice video!

    • @EricStrebel
      @EricStrebel  5 лет назад +1

      This software will not work with a rotating table, lighting needs to be consistent through the entire shoot. Thanks for the comment and support

    • @Ciupremo
      @Ciupremo 5 лет назад

      @@EricStrebel Oh ye, you are right, I skipped just those seconds where you mentioned it! Sorry...

    • @КристинаТихончук-л4ъ
      @КристинаТихончук-л4ъ 5 лет назад

      @@EricStrebel You are wrong. This software is working with a rotating table. I've built more than 1.5 year ago a fully automated turntable rig with rotating table. Since then I have no problems with the results. And the key is in proper light setup. Rig with rotating table has more pluses as for me. Occupy less space, more stable when camera moving upward (my do it automaticly) as I have more pionts to fix the arc.

    • @EricStrebel
      @EricStrebel  5 лет назад

      @@КристинаТихончук-л4ъ perhaps, good for you, I am just not able to create a diffused light source, that will create a uniform lighting, so I will have to stick with my solution, feel free to share your creation on social media with me, I would like to see your set up @ botzendesign

  • @MilanKarakas
    @MilanKarakas 4 года назад +1

    Where did you get and what is the name of the paint that is applied over the plastic bottle for making fine details?

    • @EricStrebel
      @EricStrebel  4 года назад +1

      It’s just regular automotive Sandable gray and white and black primer, duplicolor brand

    • @MilanKarakas
      @MilanKarakas 4 года назад +1

      @@EricStrebel Ah, so it is important that second, dark coat actually 'spitting' big droplets instead fine ones?

    • @EricStrebel
      @EricStrebel  4 года назад +1

      I feel some contrast is helpful

    • @MilanKarakas
      @MilanKarakas 4 года назад

      @@EricStrebel It is very helpful. Tried to make 3D model of the car - epic fail: no roof, no windows, everything else distorted (except 10% of the side parts). I can't paint my car, but for everything else.... Thanks.

  • @8BitLife69
    @8BitLife69 5 лет назад +2

    What degree arch did you use for this? Perhaps some measurements or a drawing of the design so others can try it?

    • @EricStrebel
      @EricStrebel  5 лет назад +1

      it's going to be based on the camera and the lens that you have and the objects that you're trying to scan everybody will need something different

  • @TechTroppy
    @TechTroppy 5 лет назад +3

    Is it working with more complex objects? I would like to 3d print something similar

  • @nicholasvella9543
    @nicholasvella9543 3 года назад

    Great Job! Any link to finding the template so I can try this myself pls? Thanks! :-D

  • @mrbob92679
    @mrbob92679 3 года назад

    One other question. How did you determine the camera length?

  • @nidzdotnet76
    @nidzdotnet76 4 года назад +2

    wouldn't it be easier to rotate the object on the lazy susan rather than the whole camera mount?

    • @EricStrebel
      @EricStrebel  4 года назад +1

      Yes, of course it would be, but not with this software.

  • @Alan_AB
    @Alan_AB 4 года назад +1

    @Eric Strebel Great video. Very informative. Thanks you for sharing it.
    Do you think the camera could be mounted onto the Lazy Susan and pointed outwards so as to take photos of a small room? I'm wondering if Photogrammetry could be used instead of Lidar scanning?

    • @EricStrebel
      @EricStrebel  4 года назад

      Possibly, try it out see if it works

  • @sachacarnelos
    @sachacarnelos 3 года назад

    nice

  • @howardmandel7930
    @howardmandel7930 3 года назад +2

    could you have the turntable that the object is sitting on rotate and the camera stay still?

    • @EricStrebel
      @EricStrebel  3 года назад

      Not with this software

    • @plog1805
      @plog1805 2 года назад

      What can save a lot of time and can take up to 11,000 pictures per rotation is a computer-controlled photography turntable. Iconasys makes 6 different sized turntables (1.5lbs-500lbs.). Set however many images and angles you want. Automatically removes the background on each image too. www.iconasys.com

  • @Badg0r
    @Badg0r Год назад

    You can use a inexpensive stepper motor to turn the lazy susan accurately

  • @FedericoSalis
    @FedericoSalis 5 лет назад +1

    nice ! exif of camera shot ?

    • @EricStrebel
      @EricStrebel  5 лет назад

      I don't understand what you're asking me

    • @FedericoSalis
      @FedericoSalis 5 лет назад +1

      @@EricStrebel hi Eric .. Camera settings, aperture, shutter speed, focal length for example

    • @EricStrebel
      @EricStrebel  5 лет назад +1

      The important thing is to get a large depth of field so everything is in focus. The rest does not seem important, other than soft lighting.

  • @jonconley4424
    @jonconley4424 7 месяцев назад

    Why not keep the camera and background stationary and have the object on a slow turntable?

  • @julianruan1093
    @julianruan1093 4 года назад

    Yooo what programs did you use ???

  • @irfannaseem5530
    @irfannaseem5530 4 года назад

    Which softwere use after scanning to mesh

  • @DIY3DTECHcom
    @DIY3DTECHcom 5 лет назад +1

    Super cool design! I like the way you lay things out "simplistically" and build up! I might steal parts of the idea as I am messing around with Meshroom (github.com/alicevision/meshroom/releases/tag/v2018.1.0) and it likes the object to remain stationary rather then sit on a turn table itself.

    • @EricStrebel
      @EricStrebel  5 лет назад

      DIY3DTECH.com use what you need. Good luck!

  • @Rufus066
    @Rufus066 4 года назад +1

    Add a random pattern to your rotating base for better detail and tracking

    • @EricStrebel
      @EricStrebel  4 года назад

      Good idea

    • @Rufus066
      @Rufus066 4 года назад

      @@EricStrebel yours has one with the wood grain I think that's why it tracked so well

  • @snowwolvesproductions
    @snowwolvesproductions 5 лет назад +2

    wouldn't it have been easier to just rotate the bottle instead. you could even have used a motor to turn it slowly. The light would stay constant and so would the background...?

    • @EricStrebel
      @EricStrebel  5 лет назад

      sure would, but this software does not make that easy.

  • @danielepatron7333
    @danielepatron7333 3 года назад

    Where can I buy it already?

  • @RichSobocinski
    @RichSobocinski 5 лет назад +3

    Why wouldn't you just rotate the object in the center and keep the camera, background, and lighting stationary?

    • @EricStrebel
      @EricStrebel  5 лет назад

      Rich Sobocinski most os the software does not work that way, unfortunately. It wants the camera to move and the object and lighting to remain constant. Thanks for your comment.

    • @TuttleScott
      @TuttleScott 5 лет назад +1

      @@EricStrebel would a black background provide more consistent lighting? the white does a lot of reflecting. not that it didnt work great but an easy enough upgrade.

    • @RichSobocinski
      @RichSobocinski 5 лет назад +2

      @@EricStrebel sorry, still scratching my head. I don't see how the s\w knows the difference. It's still getting 360 degree image data

    • @EricStrebel
      @EricStrebel  5 лет назад +2

      Scott Tuttle good question! You are definitly right about the bounced light. I would think that there needs to be enough contrast between the object and the background and then that could work. Dunno, might have to try some day. Thanks for the suggestion.

    • @EricStrebel
      @EricStrebel  5 лет назад +1

      Rich Sobocinski Don't worry you are not alone, lots of head scratching going on with this photogrammetry software and process. But the other way just does not work so great when the object moves unless the lighting is super constant. The software seems to play a big part in the equation as well, basically I am tricking or hacking the software on a physical level.