No matter how Clever You are, the UGLY 4 will Fool You!!
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 8 сен 2024
- My Amazon.com shop:
www.amazon.com...
As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.
Solids of constant width are available here:
jpgamesltd.co....
The puzzle shown in this video is available here:
jigsawholic.co...
Music and SFX I used in this video is available here:
bit.ly/375iM19
More cool puzzle shops I do recommend:
US:
www.puzzlemast...
www.creativecr...
www.artofplay....
www.shareasale... (10% discount by using the voucher "Mr Puzzle")
Europe:
jpgamesltd.co....
cruxpuzzles.co...
www.knobelbox....
www.logicagioc...
jigsawholic.co...
Asia:
www.siammandal...
The links above are affiliate links. If you click the link and buy a product, I will receive a commission from the seller.
Visit me on facebook for additional information:
/ mr.puzzleyoutube
Support me and become one of my Patrons:
/ mrpuzzle
That several pieces can go in different places as you move closer to the end makes it much more difficult. Very nice puzzle.
I really love how this puzzle video starts with a gadget showcase that turns into a lesson in designing a solid of constant width.
Mr. Puzzle's excitement is very contagious. I always love his "A-HA!" Moments.
i LOVED this puzzle. Wasn't as big of a fan of his 8 cats, but ugly 4 was a satisfying experience.
Brilliantly solved Mr P, less than an hour for a 10 out of 10. That first corner piece is the trick, and very clever for it not to be a conventional piece.
Aside for the puzzles I'm also excited to see your gadgets & toys. Pls do more of those so I can order those with puzzles as my collection.
I definitely will 😁🙏
Don't think I have ever pointed at a screen going, "no no it goes there that one goes there" very enjoyable video. Thank you
I was leaving work the other day and saw a vehicle license plate the said 'MRPUZZ 1' and I immediately thought of you. Unless you were in the state of Illinois in America, I doubt it was you lol.
The name of the puzzle is a hint. 3 corners look fine but 1 is ugly.
Man, your pure passionate energic voice just cheers me up! 😁 Loved the sneaky puzzle too!
Cheers from Iran.
3:49 "This shape in here, ja"😂
😅
“The packing puzzle month”
It’s now official since Mr.Puzzle declared it!!
🤣
I'm not great at puzzles but the solution to this was just screaming at me the whole time. That ugly piece fit perfectly on your first pair and it took you half an hour to see it, driving me crazy lol. great solve, love your videos.
😅👍
My first thought was that that ugly piece in the corner had to be a corner piece. Tho I doubt I would have actually solved the thing
"Keep in mind that knowing the solution cannot be reversed" jokes on you i have a really bad memory
I do have a question. Do you think it would be possible to guess if there would be gaps in such puzzle using water and mathematic? I'll explain:
Let's say that you measure the lenght and width of the inner frame and you multiply this by the depth of a puzzle piece. This should give you the final volume of the puzzle if there are no gap.
Now for the next step, you drop the pieces inside a graduated cylinder and you check if the volume of water moved by the pieces is the same as the volume calculated with the frame. This would give you an idea of the gaps to expect.
I don't have tools to try it and I'm not sure if would work or if the difference would not be noticable.
Theoretically yes, but I reality it will not work. The actual gap is very small compared to the overall volume. Plus you method does not take in account that there are also small gaps between the puzzle pieces. This would cause some wrong conclusions since you will not be able to determine how much volume is consumed by those gaps.
I really liked it The solid of constants!!
I saw this puzzle a while ago, i think Chris Ramsay already solved this one, its still fun to see what people think of when solving a puzzle
yep but Mr Puzzle does the solve with calculated actions and predictions. I like to see both approaches
When you watch Chris solving the puzzle, you get frustrated because he solves it the exact opposite way than common sense would tell you.
08:33
"Maybe this one irgendwo hier?" 😂
Under*
@@trytobefun9065 he says "irgendwo", it's a german word which means "somewhere"
That was so cool. On the surface it seems like kind of random whether you guess the correct orientation but you showed there was a cool algorithm like thing to solving it where you replaced already used pieces as you went to eventually reach the solution
This brilliant puzzle makes you think outside the box.
Beautiful and great puzzle.
That is incredibly clever design.
Descent into puzzle mode is a descent into madness, but it's wonderful. Thank you for sharing!
The fact the pieces can look right when upside down definitely increases the difficulty of this puzzle.
I really like this one because the design aspects of it. It is a beautiful puzzle, a jigsaw of all things and I love jigsaw puzzles. The fact that it can be started like a regular jigsaw puzzle is mesmerizing because our brains are conditionally binded to solve it that way. The genius of it all is that all the pieces can connect someway to the other pieces and finding that Aha moment is what is satisfying about this one. I would love to have one of these. Awesome design.
Those little squirrelly objects would be great earthquake objects under a building plate.
3:48 - just like the rotor of Wankel rotary engine
The spinning dorito
Had a giggle at you calling them 4 ugly guys
I love the voice. It reminds me of Jan Muller-Michaelis who made the game Deponia.
Well done
Prediction: 1 corner piece is *not* a corner piece.
You are right!
The white base and transparent colored pieces reminded me of Yuu Asaka's packing puzzles.
So much fun to watch. Loved the jokes about the puzzle pieces! 🤣🤣🤣
Not that it really matters, and someone might have pointed this out, but a Reuleaux tetrahedron is actually not a solid of constant width. The Reuleaux triangle IS a surface of constant width, but its 3D version, while close, isn't. A Reuleaux tetrahedron needs to be modified to become a Meissner tetrahedron, which then is a solid of constant width. So, if those three objects shown in the video are objects of constant width, I'm assuming they are Meissner tetrahedra (and therefore the construction is more complicated than just using the circle drawing method); either that, or they are not actually precisely surfaces of constant width but rather approximations of such.
The puzzle makers just knew people couldn’t resist starting from the corner and edges.
Another great puzzle. Lovin the vids!
I try to collect all kind of puzzles
give us the Lego Treasure Chest puzzle
The centers of the 3 circles are supposed to be on the 3 corners of the triangle.
I like packing puzzles but they are not even worth buying this one took me less than 10 mins to solve and it was the highest difficulty I could find
That's such a clever puzzle!
What?!! That is insanity.
Amazing puzzle
love when he shows off the gadgets :)
Mr puzzle’s puzzle mood seems scarier than nuclear weapons
This puzzle reminds me of Yuu Asaka's jigsaws in more than one way. Even the name seems to be a reference to those.
After the corner pieces I'll do the edge pieces like any normal person doing a jigsaw.
Proceeds to ignore the edges.
1:15
IT HAD ONE DRINK TOO MUCH LAST NIGHT...
😀😀😀😆
Great!!!
You know, May is the beginning of Spring for most of the Northern Hemisphere, and a lot of people do "spring cleaning" in May where they pack up all of their winter things to put away or get rid of. You said yourself you've done almost only packing puzzles this month... Maybe you can do like other RUclipsrs and have an annual themed month for your channel? Call it "Spring Packing Month" or something like that and just do packing puzzles for the month of May every year?
8:42 that's the true ugly 4 right there. Watched this thru Chris Ramsay previously before here, that 4 pieces that cant fit in the middle after building all the corners is the UGLY 4 pieces.
Bought a limited edition puzzle kit called the Sherlock, has 52 diff rent puzzles in it. Promises long hours of entertainment while I work
9:04 it's called the ugly 4 because as you can see you have 4 pieces left which you can't fit in.
lol, ive had my eye on the big bommel, and then at the end that was the one that had to be connected to that complex part :D
A note book episode❤️🙏🏼😀
I would love to see you design and sell a puzzle that looks like your logo. That would be so cool👍🏽
how does he always know how mutch time took him, very good sense of time for real
he just has been puzzling like forever. You do start to get a sense of the time indeed. He is pretty accurate!
I really enjoyed this one!
Hard to believe it took you over 45 minutes to figure it out, seemed pretty easy from the start. It would have been nice to see all the attempts and configurations you tried, but that would have made the video almost an hour long, which you probably did not want. I guess sometimes when you have your brain trained to think in one way, it is difficult to have to retrain it to solve a puzzle. Jigsaw puzzles are definitely not the same as a maze, or a 3 dimensional puzzle, especially when you get used to looking for the solutions using the same methods every time. I was definitely entertained and impressed. Good job.
11:22 bruh...
3:30 left page
So you're finally designing your own puzzle?
The question is whether that is the only solution.
it's more like the ugly 5 if i every try to solve it
Noooooooooo
5:03 Top right looking sus
Nice! And entertaining!
Well done Mr Puzzle
i deeply envy in a good way ur mmind and patience good lord!!!!
Viele Grüße aus Kroatien! 😄
I wonder if this is part of a multiple super puzzle?
Nice!
That would have taken me infinity years to solve.
I usually find it easier to start outside the frame.
i swear iv seen you do this one already
I know I shouldn’t but I want to eat those pieces. They just look like they taste good
I was ready to be disappointed when saw the vid was only 15 minutes and you were also showing off other things, glad that was just due to cuts and it was a challenging solve for you.
A Jigsaw puzzle???? Fk this I'm out, I don't wanna die!
14:23 yay !
I know what that piece of glass is used for outside this video XD
For what?
@@marinvracevic I'm guessing it's a bed for a 3d printer
@@xndr1105 it might be, but thats not what it is used for ;)
Its from my country 😀 I didnt know ...
playing puzzle games on Android or Google play store helps you get use to solving these type of puzzles
Are there puzzles like these you can do online? If not, someone needs to make it.
Feels kind of dumb to be stating the obvious, but this puzzle seems to be heavily inspired by Yuu Asaka's jigsaws. Even the name is a throwback to his works
Also, how's the planet puzzle doing? Haven't seen any updates on it in a while.
Hrvatskaaaa!!!!!!
I love these puzzles. Shame they aren't like $9.99 as they would be an instant buy
Yeah all the puzzles shown on this channel are insanely overpriced for what they are. This one is actually on the cheap end.
@@pauledwards2052 i appreciate they will have to recoup the RnD, but to laser cut the acrylic can't cost that much once it's all planned out. I appreciate puzzles are a bit niche, but if this was $20 inc shipping not $40, I would have bought a few as gifts no trouble.
Still, it's their business and must work for them, so who am I to complain
very nice video!
The moment i saw that weird shaped piece, i thought "oh it looks like it should go in a corner"
Looks like i was right haha
I know it would be cheating but have tried modelling the puzzle in 2D CAD and solving it with a nesting program (ProNest for example) ?
Deja Vu, I feel like Mr. Puzzle solved this before.
Maybe you saw this in Chris Ramsay video
Jigsaw puzzles are my specialty, so I would have said this was maybe a 3/5. As soon as you put the top left corner, I could see how the top row fit together because my eyes are trained to look at the shapes of the pieces (I even used to put puzzles with odd-shaped pieces together upside down just to practice). Judging by timestamps vs progress, I would guess I could have put this puzzle together in about 30-35 minutes on my first try. Definitely a challenge, but the bulk of the challenge disappears the moment you realise that the one ugly piece must be a corner. From there, it's all down to how good you are at spacial recognition/relationships.
I'm probably going to get this puzzle because it could also be considered a logic problem and geometry puzzle. It'll make a great learning tool for the kids.
I know that this is a weird question, but can you write the name of who made the puzzle? (When you said, the surname sounded a bit familiar).
And btw nice video (sorry if some of the english is wrong, I'm from Croatia).
I think it's something about "Božidar Štimac" :)
😁
Are the pieces one-sided or double-sided?
Double
pause on 8:49 and rotate that piece then place
2:37 So the wheels humans invented 20 billion years ago could be this shape instead of round?!!! My world will never be the same! O_O
FINALLY! A puzzle named after my exes.
So HYPE
😁👍
I think I'm catching on. in vids where he spends a lot of time on a gadget that the puzzle of the week was a bit too easy. ; ]
This is entering the sociopathic zone.....
Wooow
So mentioning *a certain Japanese puzzle maker* is subject to censorship for some reason.
I think that difficulty is a 7 or 8 of 10, because a similar puzzle could still be much more difficult, so it can't be a full 10.
You only really have 10 ratings so necessarily multiple puzzles are going to have the same difficulty number even if some are more difficult than others. Also, rating is a very subjective thing. I feel like the type of person who watches a puzzle channel is for the most part going to have an easier time solving than others the puzzle might be sold to.
@@Tahgtahv I agree, it all depends on the target market. Saying it's a 10 communicates the scale they are using, and they probably don't want to ever use anything below a 4 or maybe a 3. But, I feel like after doing this one many people would want one that is noticeably harder, so I doubt I would have rated it a 10.
@@Tahgtahv But 7 is too low, considering the good points you made.