Yeah, I prefer the older version, it was more exciting to se them fight up close and personal rather than watching as they throw proyectiles at eachother
LF's developer used a copyright strike on YT to take down one of the Packsify videos on our channel. Copyright complaints are meant to protect the copyrighted material. For example, if we record movie footage from a cinema and post it on YT, it infringes copyright. Suppose someone uses a small part of the footage for commentary or to explain another thing, like our videos. In that case, it is considered fair use. We can appeal the Strikes, but it will cost us money and time. We are surprised YT will accept the complaint, which means they can technically submit more strikes to all LF videos on our channel. Will they do that? Well, when they submit the complaint, they can choose the following: 1) 7-day warning + Strike if doesn't comply. 2) Strike immediately. They choose the second option, showing that their purpose isn't to take down a video but to try to kill a channel. Furthermore, they never contacted us and did not respond to our emails. We have no choice and don't have faith in them for not striking another video. We have to remove all LF videos to protect the channel. Please note that they didn't ask us to remove videos. We remove them solely to protect our channel and out of choice.
LF's developer used a copyright strike on YT to take down one of the Packsify videos on our channel. Copyright complaints are meant to protect the copyrighted material. For example, if we record movie footage from a cinema and post it on YT, it infringes copyright. Suppose someone uses a small part of the footage for commentary or to explain another thing, like our videos. In that case, it is considered fair use. We can appeal the Strikes, but it will cost us money and time. We are surprised YT will accept the complaint, which means they can technically submit more strikes to all LF videos on our channel. Will they do that? Well, when they submit the complaint, they can choose the following: 1) 7-day warning + Strike if doesn't comply. 2) Strike immediately. They choose the second option, showing that their purpose isn't to take down a video but to try to kill a channel. Furthermore, they never contacted us and did not respond to our emails. We have no choice and don't have faith in them for not striking another video. We have to remove all LF videos to protect the channel. Please note that they didn't ask us to remove videos. We remove them solely to protect our channel and out of choice.
![Sea of Conquest: Mastering Attack and Damage Bonuses and Win a Stronger Player [Attribute EP01]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/dffLF2gAYkM/mqdefault.jpg)
![Felix "Unfair" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Oswujxm2Ag0/mqdefault.jpg)
Yeah, I prefer the older version, it was more exciting to se them fight up close and personal rather than watching as they throw proyectiles at eachother
Hate these changes
Hey bro!!! Did you delete all the videos of Last Fortress Underground
LF's developer used a copyright strike on YT to take down one of the Packsify videos on our channel. Copyright complaints are meant to protect the copyrighted material. For example, if we record movie footage from a cinema and post it on YT, it infringes copyright. Suppose someone uses a small part of the footage for commentary or to explain another thing, like our videos. In that case, it is considered fair use. We can appeal the Strikes, but it will cost us money and time. We are surprised YT will accept the complaint, which means they can technically submit more strikes to all LF videos on our channel.
Will they do that?
Well, when they submit the complaint, they can choose the following:
1) 7-day warning + Strike if doesn't comply.
2) Strike immediately.
They choose the second option, showing that their purpose isn't to take down a video but to try to kill a channel.
Furthermore, they never contacted us and did not respond to our emails. We have no choice and don't have faith in them for not striking another video.
We have to remove all LF videos to protect the channel. Please note that they didn't ask us to remove videos. We remove them solely to protect our channel and out of choice.
@I wanted you to advise me for my alignments. Could it be by discord???
They also changed some of the hero skills in combat
I don't understand why you deleted the video last fortress and I love watching them so much😢
LF's developer used a copyright strike on YT to take down one of the Packsify videos on our channel. Copyright complaints are meant to protect the copyrighted material. For example, if we record movie footage from a cinema and post it on YT, it infringes copyright. Suppose someone uses a small part of the footage for commentary or to explain another thing, like our videos. In that case, it is considered fair use. We can appeal the Strikes, but it will cost us money and time. We are surprised YT will accept the complaint, which means they can technically submit more strikes to all LF videos on our channel.
Will they do that?
Well, when they submit the complaint, they can choose the following:
1) 7-day warning + Strike if doesn't comply.
2) Strike immediately.
They choose the second option, showing that their purpose isn't to take down a video but to try to kill a channel.
Furthermore, they never contacted us and did not respond to our emails. We have no choice and don't have faith in them for not striking another video.
We have to remove all LF videos to protect the channel. Please note that they didn't ask us to remove videos. We remove them solely to protect our channel and out of choice.
@@metainstincts ты можешь разместить контент на разных других площадках, где не смогут тебе кинуть БАН😊😊
Those changes are so fricking annoying