Solved Problems on Magnetically Coupled Circuits

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 23 янв 2025
  • НаукаНаука

Комментарии • 54

  • @ALLABOUTELECTRONICS
    @ALLABOUTELECTRONICS  7 лет назад +22

    CORRECTION:
    Example 1: Instead of absorbed power, please consider it as the dissipated power in the circuit.

  • @ALLABOUTELECTRONICS
    @ALLABOUTELECTRONICS  7 лет назад +3

    For more problems on Magnetically Coupled Circuits, the downloadable google drive link is given in the description.
    While solving if you have any questions, do let me know here.

    • @sudiptosikder3144
      @sudiptosikder3144 6 лет назад

      ans 1 is 2.5044 H
      ans 2 is -20j ohm
      am I right ?

    • @You_Tube12355
      @You_Tube12355 5 лет назад

      Sir can u made video on problem of coupled ckt like
      to find volt or power
      Developed across any elements

    • @hjhjhj5934
      @hjhjhj5934 3 года назад +1

      ans 1 - 2.5044H
      ans 2 - 9 ohm
      ans 3 - 9.8 H
      correct?

    • @monalisabanra2733
      @monalisabanra2733 2 года назад +1

      can someone explain the 2nd ques of pdf

  • @BentHestad
    @BentHestad 6 лет назад +8

    A brilliant and very clear cut explanation! Thanks!

  • @josephguida5432
    @josephguida5432 3 года назад +1

    Took my time to unpack it and I learned the lesson well. Thanks again!

  • @manoharg9620
    @manoharg9620 3 года назад +2

    In the first problem,according to single phase notation we need to consider 50V as maximum value but in the problem 50V is considered as rms value.Hence analysis is wrong.(In single phase circuits if the voltages are specified in polar form,by default it must be maximum value.If it is rms value it need to specified Source :NPTEL Videos)

  • @kajalkumari1192
    @kajalkumari1192 6 лет назад +2

    I really like this channel, video was really helpful, thank you

  • @ST-us7kq
    @ST-us7kq 7 лет назад +2

    i love your videos thanks for posting

  • @sridharkrishnamurthy5779
    @sridharkrishnamurthy5779 5 лет назад +2

    Can u pls explain why 8-M^2/2= 3?

  • @pranjalsrivastava3836
    @pranjalsrivastava3836 7 лет назад +1

    sir how to you take equation j5+j8-2jxm ...
    and why we cant take quation j5+j8+2jxm....
    in example no. 1

    • @ALLABOUTELECTRONICS
      @ALLABOUTELECTRONICS  7 лет назад

      At 6:29, the value of jX has been calculated and it is j7 ohm. Now, if we take j5+j8+2jXm, then, in that case, you will never get jX as j7 and it will be more than j13. It is only possible when 2jXm is subtracted from the (j5+j8). I hope, it will clear your doubt.

    • @pranjalsrivastava3836
      @pranjalsrivastava3836 7 лет назад

      ALL ABOUT ELECTRONICS
      ya its clear

  • @darshanrs3285
    @darshanrs3285 3 месяца назад

    how can u take Imax in power dissipated equation it should be Irms

  • @freethinkeraziz8893
    @freethinkeraziz8893 2 года назад

    You say power always absorbed only across resistive elements.
    My question is reactive element why can not absorb power?

  • @surendrakverma555
    @surendrakverma555 2 года назад +1

    Thanks 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏

  • @musclelovers2761
    @musclelovers2761 7 лет назад +1

    sir doubt power absorption takes place in inductors and capacitors but u said power is absorbed in resistor how.

    • @ALLABOUTELECTRONICS
      @ALLABOUTELECTRONICS  7 лет назад +3

      Yes, you are correct Raj. Rightly observed.
      It should have been framed like power is dissipated rather than absorbed.
      In resistor power only gets dissipated in form of heat.
      My Mistake.

    • @musclelovers2761
      @musclelovers2761 7 лет назад

      thanks for ur reply sir then the procedure which u followed i think wrong sir.

    • @ALLABOUTELECTRONICS
      @ALLABOUTELECTRONICS  7 лет назад +2

      No, once you consider that power as dissipated power in the same example then procedure is alright.
      I mean consider the power in the example as dissipated power rather than absorbed power.

  • @chandanaapriya
    @chandanaapriya 5 лет назад +1

    Why did we consider the value of lp is 4 in 2nd prblm it's probably to be 3 right

    • @ALLABOUTELECTRONICS
      @ALLABOUTELECTRONICS  5 лет назад

      In the question, it is given that the inductance between 1 am 2 is 4H, when 3 and 4 terminals are open. And it is 3H when 3 and 4 are short-circuited. Please check the question once again, you will get it.

    • @domagojbilandzija5705
      @domagojbilandzija5705 4 года назад

      @@ALLABOUTELECTRONICS Hello :) I agree with Chandana Priya. Why we used a value of 4H as Lp in the second problem instead of 3H? Value of 4H is present when secondary side (terminals 3-4) is opened. Equations (1) and (2) are for the case when secondary side (terminals 3-4) is short circuited and in that case Lp is 3H. Still you used value of 4H as Lp.

  • @srikanthk4070
    @srikanthk4070 5 лет назад +1

    How the value of v2 =0 . when we short the second circuit sir..

    • @ALLABOUTELECTRONICS
      @ALLABOUTELECTRONICS  5 лет назад +2

      voltage V2 is the voltage between terminal 3 and 4. When 3 and 4 is short-circuited then terminal 3 and 4 will be at the same potential. Or in other words V2 =0.
      I hope it will clear your doubt.

  • @abhasdas9463
    @abhasdas9463 6 лет назад +1

    sir can u please make a video on ideal and real transformers?

  • @rohankademani6406
    @rohankademani6406 5 лет назад +1

    Sir very helpfull videos

  • @arifkhan-rb7dl
    @arifkhan-rb7dl Год назад

    can you please pleas make a detailed vido on telephone hybrid circuit

  • @devasish_
    @devasish_ 6 лет назад

    How can we determine the coupled equation after getting jx value

    • @ALLABOUTELECTRONICS
      @ALLABOUTELECTRONICS  6 лет назад +1

      Would you please provide the exact timing in the video where you are referring?

  • @abhijithmadhusoodanannair9830
    @abhijithmadhusoodanannair9830 6 лет назад

    Please make a video on transient and steady state conditions

  • @RupeshChandu1
    @RupeshChandu1 4 года назад

    Sir why you consider only lp=4
    Why lp=3
    Please reply sir

    • @ALLABOUTELECTRONICS
      @ALLABOUTELECTRONICS  4 года назад

      As I mentioned at 8:50, when terminal 3-4 open-circuited, no current is flowing through the secondary coil. That means there won't be any coupling on the primary side due to secondary coil (as no current is flowing through Ls).
      So, whatever inductance measured at the primary side is entirely a self-inductance Lp.
      That's why Lp = 4H
      I hope it will clear your doubt.

    • @RupeshChandu1
      @RupeshChandu1 4 года назад

      @@ALLABOUTELECTRONICS
      Why (8-m*m)2=3?
      Why can't be 4
      At 12:06

    • @ALLABOUTELECTRONICS
      @ALLABOUTELECTRONICS  4 года назад

      Because, it's the inductance seen at the primary side when secondary is short circuited.
      He equations are written when secondary is short circuited.
      I hope it will clear your doubt.
      If you still have any doubt please let me know here.

    • @RupeshChandu1
      @RupeshChandu1 4 года назад +1

      @@ALLABOUTELECTRONICS as you said these equations are regarding to the second condition
      Then why you kept lp=4
      As they mentioned in the question when it (3,4 terminals short circuited)lp=3
      Why you take lp=4
      At 11:20

    • @ALLABOUTELECTRONICS
      @ALLABOUTELECTRONICS  4 года назад

      @@RupeshChandu1 Lp is the self-inductance on the primary side. Using the first condition, when the secondary side is open, we found the self-inductance Lp on the primary side and using the second condition, we found mutual inductance.
      As, you are aware for the two mutually coupled coils, the voltage across any coils is due to self-inductance and the mutual inductance.
      At 11:32, exactly that is written. I hope it will clear your confusion.

  • @thedrunkphoenix9477
    @thedrunkphoenix9477 3 года назад

    why we didn't wrote V1= Lp di1/dt + M di2/dt ????

    • @anusuyabhattacharyya9580
      @anusuyabhattacharyya9580 2 года назад

      Your equation is in time domain. He is solving in frequency domain. In frequency domain d/dt becomes jw where w is the frequency in rad/sec

  • @monalisabanra2733
    @monalisabanra2733 2 года назад

    why lp is taken as 4 but it is given 3 in 2nd prblm?

    • @ALLABOUTELECTRONICS
      @ALLABOUTELECTRONICS  2 года назад +2

      It is 4H when terminals 3 and 4 are open and Lp is 3H when 3 and 4 are short-circuited. Please check the question once again, you will get it.

  • @Vishal-wy7re
    @Vishal-wy7re 7 месяцев назад

    In the first problem why you take j5+j8-2jXm instead of j5+j8+2jXm

    • @ALLABOUTELECTRONICS
      @ALLABOUTELECTRONICS  7 месяцев назад +1

      I think, you didn't understand the question properly. The thing is, the mutual inductance can be additive or subtractive. Since here the dot convention is not given, so from the given circuit parameters we need to find out, whether it is additive or subtractive. So, first from the given power, the total reactance X was calculated. And from that, the mutual inductance equation which satisfies this reactance is selected. Please watch that part again, you will get it. If you still have any doubt then let me know here.

  • @ShAmS894
    @ShAmS894 5 лет назад +1

    how is 8-sq(m)/2 =3

  • @pratyushharsh7186
    @pratyushharsh7186 5 лет назад

    i love all about electronics

  • @rudrapratapbansidhar4416
    @rudrapratapbansidhar4416 7 лет назад

    nice.

  • @samuelderbyshire3080
    @samuelderbyshire3080 7 лет назад

    can an english version be made the accent is very annoying