The guard with the sunglasses actually brought the sunglasses in himself because he had seen Cool Hand Luke the night before and figured he should act like the guard in Cool Hand Luke (who had the same sunglasses... because it was sunny and they were outside a lot
Dr Philip Zimbardo who run the STANFORD PRISON EXPERIMENT should not have legal clearance to run either "shows" or sell books on his self-imagined cruelty. He is simply insane as well as a felon.
Critical Social Psychology*. Because 1. Ethics+how poorly that was handled, there is much to learn for students on ethical and non ethical experiments and the growth of psychology into a more ethical field. 2. Whether Zimbardo was ethical or not, whether he himself was cruel or not, this experiment shows a critical insight into ROLES and how they define+impact our society. This experiment is responsible for things that we now see as common knowledge. That given a badge+authority humans have a tendency to get drunk on that+act accordingly. When studying psychology, students are introduced to Zimbardo very early on because it is so integral to social psychology+ethics within psych.
Dr. Kelly's reference to American soldiers as "murderers" bespeaks her ignorance of the complexity of that (or any) war and perpetuates a negative stereotype. It is surprising that in spite of her training, she would make such a broad sweeping remark.
taking personal status or feelings out of it, soldiers are taught to kill, whether our opinion of the reason of their killings is right or wrong, to defend a country or invade another, it is still killing. And in the instance of American soldiers, historically and even currently, they are killing savagely, killing innocent people, torturing them, raping and killing woman and children while dismembering their bodies, and even going so far as to use biological warfare and using agent orange, atomic bombs, white phosphorus bombs, etc. That is the horrible truth.
What all of the replies are failing to account for is that war is a two party affair, and is irrational no matter which side is the focus. Yes, American military regulars committed war crimes and played a role which has been center stage of many historical critiques. These perspectives however fail to be comprehensive in the conflict as a whole, and allow for the North Vietnamese, Viet-Cong, and supporting Chinese and Soviet elements of the war to be left unscrutinized and shrouded in ignorance. This I assume is what PsyCorps77 is speaking to, the larger picture and interplay of both opposing forces, whose collaborative conflict created the scars we all live with today. Therefore, calling one faction worse than the other is debatable, as this cannot be said with certainty...and does serve to purpurate a ignorance to the geopolitics and actions of all factions involved. Whether that be the Vietnam conflict before, during, or after direct American/ Western involvement. This doesn't condone or absolve American war crimes, but it does elevate the discussion and invite it's participants toward a higher holistic understanding. To address these soldiers are murderers statements. Killing, destruction, and harm is the antithesis of irrational human nature escalated beyond reason or logic. Hate is a part of humanity, without hate there is no love, and vice versa. Those who judge people who lay down their lives fail to see the sacrifice and what it was made for, and therefore invite further discord with their scornful state of mind. The most important lesson the silent memorials of all conflicts teach, and the epitaph of all victims of war would have us all pay heed to is this: To understand, learn, and most of all, to forgive. The first way to change the future is to accept and forgive the past. Calling soldiers murderers fails to honor what soldiers sacrifice for. It fails to honor the fallen whose sacrifice stands to teach us to listen and hear one another and see the futility in conflict. Yes, soldiers have been misused too many times for any one with a love for humanity to wish to recount. But, every human that has experienced love will fight to protect that love, and even kill for it depending on the correct context. Labeling soldiers as mindless machines, as heartless mechanistic automatons that are a shadow of humanity fails to understand what they fight to protect...and further divides, sows discord, and perpetuates hatred. The soldier doesn't seek conflict, the soldier does not enjoy chaos, the soldier is not hateful. The soldiers are the courageous of our communities, they are the ones who are willing to sacrifice themselves, mind, body, and soul in all of the nightmarish degrees of death to preserve what they love and posterity. Yet, we all too often forget that fact and allow these politicians and business men to send them into transitory infernos of preliminary concern. Soldiers are not murderers, we bystanders who say nothing and do nothing are. We cowards who condemn them to fate for nothing and spit on their sacrifice for us, through our cowardice to speak truth, to exercise our rights, and refuse injustice. Gloria Victis.
When civilians kill civilians (unless in self-defence) it is widely referred to as "murder." When soldiers kill soldiers it is widely referred to as "killing." When soldiers kill civilians it is widely referred to as "murder." I'm guessing if she referred to a soldier killing another soldier she would do so. However, she is referring to soldiers murdering civilians. There's a fundamental difference between these two acts. Rather than making any kind of judgment against Vietnam soldiers or soldiers in general, she appears to be merely stating fact.
![YoungBoy Never Broke Again - Catch Me [Official Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/KxwEXXFQMTY/mqdefault.jpg)
Doing psychology homework
Higgins Trod same here
same lmao
Im doing phycology homework too haha
Me too!! They started this new class called life !! It will kick your ass and make you study your actions.
lmao im in class rn
:)
So none of them sued for distress after this?
The guard with the sunglasses actually brought the sunglasses in himself because he had seen Cool Hand Luke the night before and figured he should act like the guard in Cool Hand Luke (who had the same sunglasses... because it was sunny and they were outside a lot
Dr Philip Zimbardo who run the STANFORD PRISON EXPERIMENT should not have legal clearance to run either "shows" or sell books on his self-imagined cruelty. He is simply insane as well as a felon.
Totally agree! he wanted to prove how evil can people become, but only showed how evil, he himself is by abusing people in order to become famous.
What is the point of critical psychology here?Like what the title referes to.
Critical Social Psychology*.
Because 1. Ethics+how poorly that was handled, there is much to learn for students on ethical and non ethical experiments and the growth of psychology into a more ethical field.
2. Whether Zimbardo was ethical or not, whether he himself was cruel or not, this experiment shows a critical insight into ROLES and how they define+impact our society. This experiment is responsible for things that we now see as common knowledge. That given a badge+authority humans have a tendency to get drunk on that+act accordingly.
When studying psychology, students are introduced to Zimbardo very early on because it is so integral to social psychology+ethics within psych.
Through covid you had this going on !!
Que crueldad tan horrible..
Dr. Kelly's reference to American soldiers as "murderers" bespeaks her ignorance of the complexity of that (or any) war and perpetuates a negative stereotype. It is surprising that in spite of her training, she would make such a broad sweeping remark.
taking personal status or feelings out of it, soldiers are taught to kill, whether our opinion of the reason of their killings is right or wrong, to defend a country or invade another, it is still killing. And in the instance of American soldiers, historically and even currently, they are killing savagely, killing innocent people, torturing them, raping and killing woman and children while dismembering their bodies, and even going so far as to use biological warfare and using agent orange, atomic bombs, white phosphorus bombs, etc. That is the horrible truth.
People who kill are murderers. Soldiers murder. Therefore soldiers are murderers. That is logic not ethics.
because soldiers are murderers? what exactly are you uncomfortable about?
What all of the replies are failing to account for is that war is a two party affair, and is irrational no matter which side is the focus. Yes, American military regulars committed war crimes and played a role which has been center stage of many historical critiques. These perspectives however fail to be comprehensive in the conflict as a whole, and allow for the North Vietnamese, Viet-Cong, and supporting Chinese and Soviet elements of the war to be left unscrutinized and shrouded in ignorance. This I assume is what PsyCorps77 is speaking to, the larger picture and interplay of both opposing forces, whose collaborative conflict created the scars we all live with today. Therefore, calling one faction worse than the other is debatable, as this cannot be said with certainty...and does serve to purpurate a ignorance to the geopolitics and actions of all factions involved. Whether that be the Vietnam conflict before, during, or after direct American/ Western involvement. This doesn't condone or absolve American war crimes, but it does elevate the discussion and invite it's participants toward a higher holistic understanding.
To address these soldiers are murderers statements. Killing, destruction, and harm is the antithesis of irrational human nature escalated beyond reason or logic. Hate is a part of humanity, without hate there is no love, and vice versa. Those who judge people who lay down their lives fail to see the sacrifice and what it was made for, and therefore invite further discord with their scornful state of mind. The most important lesson the silent memorials of all conflicts teach, and the epitaph of all victims of war would have us all pay heed to is this: To understand, learn, and most of all, to forgive. The first way to change the future is to accept and forgive the past. Calling soldiers murderers fails to honor what soldiers sacrifice for. It fails to honor the fallen whose sacrifice stands to teach us to listen and hear one another and see the futility in conflict. Yes, soldiers have been misused too many times for any one with a love for humanity to wish to recount. But, every human that has experienced love will fight to protect that love, and even kill for it depending on the correct context. Labeling soldiers as mindless machines, as heartless mechanistic automatons that are a shadow of humanity fails to understand what they fight to protect...and further divides, sows discord, and perpetuates hatred. The soldier doesn't seek conflict, the soldier does not enjoy chaos, the soldier is not hateful. The soldiers are the courageous of our communities, they are the ones who are willing to sacrifice themselves, mind, body, and soul in all of the nightmarish degrees of death to preserve what they love and posterity. Yet, we all too often forget that fact and allow these politicians and business men to send them into transitory infernos of preliminary concern. Soldiers are not murderers, we bystanders who say nothing and do nothing are. We cowards who condemn them to fate for nothing and spit on their sacrifice for us, through our cowardice to speak truth, to exercise our rights, and refuse injustice. Gloria Victis.
When civilians kill civilians (unless in self-defence) it is widely referred to as "murder."
When soldiers kill soldiers it is widely referred to as "killing."
When soldiers kill civilians it is widely referred to as "murder."
I'm guessing if she referred to a soldier killing another soldier she would do so. However, she is referring to soldiers murdering civilians. There's a fundamental difference between these two acts. Rather than making any kind of judgment against Vietnam soldiers or soldiers in general, she appears to be merely stating fact.
hi miran
hi saleh
@@miranzangana5141 sup
6)!
DME 😂😂
285384