CitizenCon 2953 Highlight | Full Aerodynamic Flight Model

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 16 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 45

  • @lamsmiley1944
    @lamsmiley1944 Год назад +44

    This is one of the features I’m looking forward to most. I hate that ships just magically stay in position while in atmosphere at the moment.

    • @v1nigra3
      @v1nigra3 Год назад

      Do you like pain?

    • @lamsmiley1944
      @lamsmiley1944 Год назад +5

      @@v1nigra3 I just find it annoying that they currently break the laws of physics.

    • @Kyumaro
      @Kyumaro Год назад +3

      I means we have plane today that can stay stationary in the air in the military like Harrier or F35, they just need their engine to be turning on to have a opposition to the gravity, so there is nothing who break the physics in having ship being able to stay stationary in the atmosphere, as long as they keep their thruster on and consume fuel.
      What break the physics for me is having ship with so many vertical thruster to stale when they shouldn't honestly, just activate the vertical thruster at low speed and you compensate the gravity.
      For big ship the thruster could not be strong enough but for fighter there is no reason.

    • @ned272
      @ned272 10 месяцев назад

      @@lamsmiley1944that’s the ONLY thing you took away from this video ? 😂 🤦🏿‍♂️

    • @sirgriffinman
      @sirgriffinman 8 месяцев назад

      pain???? millions of planes fly all over our planet just fine with aerodynamic flight in real life. No big deal. Easy with a little practice.@@v1nigra3

  • @alucard0712
    @alucard0712 Год назад +6

    That's what I'm really looking forward to! Star systems are great but atmospheric flight is whole another story. Hope we get balloons too!

  • @xXManhattanProjectXx
    @xXManhattanProjectXx 9 месяцев назад +2

    The 300 series landing gears make sense now!
    And i wonder if the Vanguard's tracked gears will make it move on the ground?

  • @chriskelvin248
    @chriskelvin248 Год назад +3

    I hope the Corsair gets finally its due in this new aero model paradigm, with its massive wing surfaces.

    • @CitizenFrost
      @CitizenFrost  Год назад +2

      That large surface are needs to have some benefits right, at the moment it's just making you easier to hit...

  • @BotanistOnDuna
    @BotanistOnDuna Год назад +1

    star citizen gonna get x-plane physics with futuristic ships. I will buy soon

  • @gremirid
    @gremirid Год назад +7

    still better than starfield

  • @TheKrumstuff
    @TheKrumstuff 10 месяцев назад

    Wonder how this will make flying big industrial ships like the reclaimer in atmosphere feel

    • @Haegemon
      @Haegemon 9 месяцев назад +2

      Like a brick.

    • @Felic_HRZN
      @Felic_HRZN 6 месяцев назад

      Just don’t fly in decoupled mode and it won’t fly much differently than it does right now.

  • @officerjohns9554
    @officerjohns9554 7 месяцев назад

    what about ships like the cutter? They don't have any aerodynamic surfaces. Do they just use their thrusters to move in the atmosphere?

    • @Felic_HRZN
      @Felic_HRZN 6 месяцев назад +1

      yes they will have a lot worse of a time in decoupled mode. This would be true for most of the ships made for space without much thought for atmosphere. Cutter, Aurora, Constellations, plenty of examples.

  • @GabriGlider
    @GabriGlider Год назад +3

    Im afraid of skill-less pilot who will complain about this flight model

    • @CitizenFrost
      @CitizenFrost  Год назад +2

      Chris is going for the 'easy to pick up, but hard to master' model, that should keep most of us happy.

    • @HelloSquiggles
      @HelloSquiggles 21 день назад

      @@CitizenFrost Anyone who has played any flight game should be familiar with this style. The mechanics necessary to dominate space combat are actually harder to adjust to, because it can turn into jousting and circle strafing a lot easier. Atmospheric flight allows for a normal rate battle in combat. Also lends itself to picking your fights based on where your at, as some ships are obviously more aerodynamic than others.

  • @xetra1155
    @xetra1155 Год назад +3

    What about ships without rudder... they just drop down I hope!

    • @CitizenFrost
      @CitizenFrost  Год назад +8

      I'd guess they will be very poor in atmosphere. Key may be to enter atmo close to landing site and let the thrusters lower you down.

    • @xetra1155
      @xetra1155 Год назад +10

      @@CitizenFrost I think much like sea ships that at some scale it's just made for space only.
      What's the point of wasting tons of fuel for thrusting to brake. Just let them fly down with smaller ships. I guess that's how it's done. Also cool to see big ass ships in the sky above

    • @forcedtoexist6221
      @forcedtoexist6221 Год назад

      Then that will be great to Roc mine with a cutlass or similar brick... not so much? Sorry - but the whole 'flight model' is and will ever be fiction - so better stick with it.@@CitizenFrost

    • @Tiag_90
      @Tiag_90 Год назад +2

      i think usually those ships have vtol mode, the redeemer and reclaimer are a good example

    • @Mak10z
      @Mak10z Год назад

      @@xetra1155 Yup, like the Hull B is going to be the last in the Hull series that can make a safe planetfall (on an earth type world)

  • @013passion
    @013passion 2 месяца назад

    one year. and noothing of this is in game now

  • @rudyrobertson1540
    @rudyrobertson1540 3 месяца назад

    No offense but the is such a terrible flight model. Really sad because I feel like I would enjoy playing but the flight model is so terrible I just can’t do it.

    • @DanceManAlex
      @DanceManAlex 3 месяца назад

      Please explain. This is exactly what the game needs for flying in atmosphere

    • @Namaka420
      @Namaka420 Месяц назад +1

      This? The new one we saw?? Tf are u talking about bud?? This is an amazing flight model. I'm sad that so many people forgot this even existed. Nobody mentions this when talking about all the updates cig failed to implement from citcon this year.