This one trick insurance companies don't want you to know about! All vehicles have self driven capabilities and use the rules of the road to make decisions instead of making an emotional decision that hurt people
Everything sounds good in theory. Til it's opened to the public. The drunks, the thieves, the scammers, vandals. Who gets the profits?, who gets the liability?
Until recently, Cruise cars were limited to 25mph and nighttime hours in SF when traffic is low, and it is still limited to the easier to navigate streets of SF. So super comparing apples to oranges in terms of fatality numbers. Is the Cruise robo taxi safer, or is it safer to drive no faster than 25mph on not busy streets that are fairly easy to navigate?
These things have every sensor known to man glued to its bumpers, pre-scanned portions of cities and they STILL just stop and block traffic because their systems are brittle piles of horse crap.
But here's the thing about these crews self-driving cars? The homeless could use those cars for for urinal and then while they're at it they could do it those same cars to shoot up drugs without anyone knowing about it! But don't worry? Y'all have cameras in the car is to catch all the action and then the police will have to come by and pick them up to take them to jail! And if that happened I would like to see if self-driving car take some of these folks that do that kind of garbage and take them go straight to jail itself without having the police come by to pick him up I've seen it done on Knight Rider where a criminal decided he wanted to steal a self-driving car so it took the person down the street drop them off in front of a police officer so he can put them in his car to take him straight to jail. And that's the way it should be! So that's why we have to get ready For that to happen. Because hopefully these self-driving cars will stop crime getting it's tracks! And once these cameras basically catch them in the act? Then they will know that they're in big trouble!
@@mikafiltenborg7572 Tesla still requires a person behind the wheel. You know what you don't see in the front seat of this car? A driver. This is a driver-less car. Tesla is a car with a good ADAS.
Yeah, Cruise has a few cities under its belt, but when they expanded to san franciso, Tesla expanded to CANADA. Cruise cant go city to city (and when their cell network dies their brittle crap software stops working) and tesla needs a safety driver to drive everywhere FOR NOW. Cruise cant even touch Teslas data lead or footprint. And if you have to pre-scan every mm first, you have a party trick, not anything remotely as scalable as Tesla's soon to be driverless generalized solution. Waymo has been losing money and isjt profitable yet and avoids freeways like the plague. I guess all the spinning toilet paper rolls and such aren't enough to get the job done since almost 2 decades after inception they still need humans to go scout locations first since the digital rails need to be laid first.
I cannot wait to use Cruise self-driving because I can tell you that for me it would work just fine and I would have to get away from the city bus and Link light rail and I also do not need to be sitting next to somebody smoking fentanyl thank you it doesn't work that way that's why then when crews really has there self-driving cars out? Count me in. As a blind person I know how to get around, felt having a self-driving car to get me around is going to be a snap. That is why I've got the cruise self-driving app so that when a car becomes available in Seattle I will be able to take it and get to my doctor's appointment without any problems!
More consistent? Timely? Walmart pays me about $1 per 1 mile. That's including customer tips. To bring groceries to apartments and homes. On their front step. If you think a self driving car can replace human drivers, go ahead and try. Customers will have to wait for these vehicles to arrive. Then walk to the car to retrieve their goods for deliveries. Do you know how unreliable gps can be at times? Good luck cruise. Self driving taxis could be a thing. But deliveries? Good luck with that. It's a lot more nuanced than following gps coordinates.
This one trick insurance companies don't want you to know about!
All vehicles have self driven capabilities and use the rules of the road to make decisions instead of making an emotional decision that hurt people
Everything sounds good in theory. Til it's opened to the public. The drunks, the thieves, the scammers, vandals. Who gets the profits?, who gets the liability?
Until recently, Cruise cars were limited to 25mph and nighttime hours in SF when traffic is low, and it is still limited to the easier to navigate streets of SF. So super comparing apples to oranges in terms of fatality numbers. Is the Cruise robo taxi safer, or is it safer to drive no faster than 25mph on not busy streets that are fairly easy to navigate?
Of course the data favors self driving cars right now. There are BILLIONS of drivers vs hundreds of autonomous vehicles...🤦
Imagine not having someone who can protect ur customers from strangers
These things have every sensor known to man glued to its bumpers, pre-scanned portions of cities and they STILL just stop and block traffic because their systems are brittle piles of horse crap.
The monopoly man is out of his mind.
But here's the thing about these crews self-driving cars? The homeless could use those cars for for urinal and then while they're at it they could do it those same cars to shoot up drugs without anyone knowing about it! But don't worry? Y'all have cameras in the car is to catch all the action and then the police will have to come by and pick them up to take them to jail! And if that happened I would like to see if self-driving car take some of these folks that do that kind of garbage and take them go straight to jail itself without having the police come by to pick him up I've seen it done on Knight Rider where a criminal decided he wanted to steal a self-driving car so it took the person down the street drop them off in front of a police officer so he can put them in his car to take him straight to jail.
And that's the way it should be! So that's why we have to get ready
For that to happen. Because hopefully these self-driving cars will stop crime getting it's tracks! And once these cameras basically catch them in the act? Then they will know that they're in big trouble!
How much does it cost to operate those vehicles? $1 per 1 mile? $5 per 1 mile? $0.05 per 1 mile?
Approximately one dollar per mile. I know that cuz I've taken Uber and Lyft that's how much they charge.
A few cents for autonomous
The numbers are bs. They have less incidents because they come to a complete stop everytime situations get too complicated.
exactly right. They also can only drive in extremely limited sandboxes and can barely do freeways.
Apt comparison to use a Boeing airplane to describe the number of people dying every day
Cruise and Waymo is so far ahead of Tesla its ridiculous.
😂😂😂You are sooo WRONG!
Sure.
@@mikafiltenborg7572 Tesla still requires a person behind the wheel. You know what you don't see in the front seat of this car? A driver. This is a driver-less car. Tesla is a car with a good ADAS.
@@mikafiltenborg7572 And this is not true because? Yeah, that's what I thought. 🤣🤣🤣
Yeah, Cruise has a few cities under its belt, but when they expanded to san franciso, Tesla expanded to CANADA. Cruise cant go city to city (and when their cell network dies their brittle crap software stops working) and tesla needs a safety driver to drive everywhere FOR NOW. Cruise cant even touch Teslas data lead or footprint.
And if you have to pre-scan every mm first, you have a party trick, not anything remotely as scalable as Tesla's soon to be driverless generalized solution.
Waymo has been losing money and isjt profitable yet and avoids freeways like the plague. I guess all the spinning toilet paper rolls and such aren't enough to get the job done since almost 2 decades after inception they still need humans to go scout locations first since the digital rails need to be laid first.
Jim looks old af.
That’s cause he is
I cannot wait to use Cruise self-driving because I can tell you that for me it would work just fine and I would have to get away from the city bus and Link light rail and I also do not need to be sitting next to somebody smoking fentanyl thank you it doesn't work that way that's why then when crews really has there self-driving cars out? Count me in. As a blind person I know how to get around, felt having a self-driving car to get me around is going to be a snap. That is why I've got the cruise self-driving app so that when a car becomes available in Seattle I will be able to take it and get to my doctor's appointment without any problems!
More consistent? Timely? Walmart pays me about $1 per 1 mile. That's including customer tips. To bring groceries to apartments and homes. On their front step. If you think a self driving car can replace human drivers, go ahead and try. Customers will have to wait for these vehicles to arrive. Then walk to the car to retrieve their goods for deliveries. Do you know how unreliable gps can be at times? Good luck cruise. Self driving taxis could be a thing. But deliveries? Good luck with that. It's a lot more nuanced than following gps coordinates.
👨🔬💇🔫🔫🔫
Mdn F1