@christian you are a master at this! I SOOO hope you are being compensated in a well-paying instructor job. I was stuck on this one, right out of the gate, and once you showed how to find the upstream routers, it clicked a light on for me. I still don't understand, on the 192.168.2 sub-intfc networks how 0.0.0.127 is a good mask. They are all /27 networks; 192.168.2.0, 192.168.2.33, and .2.64, and .2.0 (/27). Why is the OSPF mask 0.0.0.127 for all of them? Shouldn't it be .91 ? (this is about branch-2 off of PC-7) 192.168.2.0.-31, 192.168.2.32-63, 192.168.0.64-95, shouldn't the network mask be 0.0.0.91 ? How is it 0.0.0.127? Thanks for all you do!
legend of the game. He didn't even need the initial exercise IPs, yet he navigated well.
LEGENDARY!
Thank you my friend, I appreciate all your support!!!!
Helping me through my community college class this semester thank you
Thank you for all your support, I really appreciate, you are helping me to continue for long time
Fantastic video. Thanks for the help. Was stuck on the last part for quite a while.
Thank you very much, I appreciate your comment,
I was stuck for so long, you're a legend
I appreciate your comment, thank you
gracias gracias gracias ¡He usado tus videos durante los últimos 2 años y me has ayudado mucho con mis estudios! miii idooolooooo
GRaias por tu comentario, me ayuda a seguir con esto por mucho tiempo
You are a Master of networking
!!
I appreciate your comment
Thank you really helpful to understand.
Glad it was helpful!
Really Good troubleshooting!
thank you for all your support
Thanks kindly, can you please help me by telling me in the simplest way how each of the issues discovered and how you resolved them
use "show run" in all devices the try to search issues according the instructions and topology
Hi I tried to use it but the command didnt give me the same information @@romeroc24
Yo sólo quiero preguntar porque fue tu decisión en cambiar el router a ip Nat inside
para configurar NAT se requiere definir una interface con nat inside y otra con nat outside, de esa forma NAT funciona correctamente
@christian you are a master at this! I SOOO hope you are being compensated in a well-paying instructor job. I was stuck on this one, right out of the gate, and once you showed how to find the upstream routers, it clicked a light on for me.
I still don't understand, on the 192.168.2 sub-intfc networks how 0.0.0.127 is a good mask. They are all /27 networks; 192.168.2.0, 192.168.2.33, and .2.64, and .2.0 (/27). Why is the OSPF mask 0.0.0.127 for all of them? Shouldn't it be .91 ? (this is about branch-2 off of PC-7)
192.168.2.0.-31, 192.168.2.32-63, 192.168.0.64-95, shouldn't the network mask be 0.0.0.91 ? How is it 0.0.0.127?
Thanks for all you do!
Hello, thank you for all your support, the wildcard mask concept ruclips.net/video/nAywMeKdJvo/видео.html
Why is my ping in PC4 to the default gateway failing?
please review all the video, the problem is the configuration of the correct device in the troubleshooting process
So, i need more information in spanish.please.
iniciaré con las versiones en español
nice facecam, how can I do this too
;-) use a video editor or capture screen software that support that
Hey brow, can you speek in spanish too??
haré las versiones en español lo antes posible
@@romeroc24 thanks brow, you are the best