This makes sense. Thanks. I'm a 67 year old athlete with a resting HR in the 50s, and the traditional formula doesn't work well for me. This explains why.
@@TheMovementSystem Karvonen suggests I work at 123 bpm instead of 107. Big difference. At 107, I am dawdling unproductively. At 123, I can feel that I'm working sensibly.
Good stuff, as always, Matt! Would you be willing to go more in depth with the Cunningham equation (with an example) to get RMR and use it with an athlete that needs to lose x amount of pounds? Thanks again! Your content is awesome!
Hello Matt, Could I ask you a question please Where do you get the intensity percentage? if it's the HRR intensity markers then we have 40-59% 60- 89% and 90% and above, can we calculate let's say the for the lower end of vigorous intensity ( based on 60% ) and for the higher end ( based on 89%)? it's all clear, I"m just a little bit confused about the intensity 😅
You can decide on intensity based on the goal and the phase of training of the athlete. Some people may train less frequently at high % and some may train more at lower %
I'm a bit confused: if I use Karvonen, my Z2 is between 146-157, if I use max HR, it's 131-141. Needless to say, the first one wouldn't feel "easy" at all, so which should I use to actually do an 80/20 distribution? I feel like Karvonen would put me in a "yellow" zone, neither easy, nor hard.
That’s hard to say without a lactate threshold test. It’s possible that karvonen would put you above lactate threshold. If you’ve been training for a while LT might be around 70-75% MHR. But there’s a lot of variability to that
220-age is just a formula that was developed to estimate maximal heart rate based on age with decent accuracy. I'm actually not sure where the 220 came from.
During the recovery phases of interval training, my HR sometimes explodes. I'm still recovering, my breathing is still getting easier, but my HR suddenly increases higher than it did in the work phase. It doesn't happen all the time, doesn't hurt and, usually, it comes back down to where it should be quite quickly. Have you seen this before?
That's not uncommon necessarily. Heart rate often has a delayed response during interval training where it peaks toward the end of the interval and even after the interval during rest before coming down.
Las zonas de freqüência cardia mas baja queen un mayor porcentaje de grasa. Pero la frecuencia cardiaca mas alta quema mas calories de grasa. No hay zona para quemar grasa.
3 года назад
@@TheMovementSystem que opinas de esta página www.omnicalculator.com/sports/fat-burning-zone
A little bit but it has some utility in accounting for variability in resting heart rate. Not everyone needs it but if you’re doing specific heart rate based training it could be beneficial
DO NOT USE THIS. THE MAX HEART RATE IS 220, NOT 200! You will fail any part of the exam that uses this erroneous information. Please remove and redo this video!
![Megan Thee Stallion - Neva Play (feat. RM) [Official Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/TpYTyAaTRts/mqdefault.jpg)
If you're studying for the CSCS Exam, make sure to join my study group on Facebook: facebook.com/groups/2415992685342170
Thank you so much for your content! So concise, and easy to follow. I'm so glad I stumbled upon your channel :)
Glad it's been helpful for you!
Almost graduating exercise science. Sure wish I had your channel in the first years! Very clear explanations keep it up!🙌🏾👏🏾
Appreciate it!
thanks for the example! Good job!
This makes sense. Thanks. I'm a 67 year old athlete with a resting HR in the 50s, and the traditional formula doesn't work well for me. This explains why.
Yea makes sense with that low HR that this equation would work better for you. Cheers
@@TheMovementSystem Karvonen suggests I work at 123 bpm instead of 107. Big difference. At 107, I am dawdling unproductively. At 123, I can feel that I'm working sensibly.
@@aeiou99999 Makes sense
Love this. Thank you so much!
Thanks this will help with my tests!
Go get that A my friend
Good stuff, as always, Matt! Would you be willing to go more in depth with the Cunningham equation (with an example) to get RMR and use it with an athlete that needs to lose x amount of pounds?
Thanks again! Your content is awesome!
Yes! I will make a CSCS Nutrition Video
Yeah I really needed this. Thanks man
Glad I could help
Seems that the karvonen method is more accurate to utilise zone training. Calculate your zones.
Hello Matt, Could I ask you a question please
Where do you get the intensity percentage?
if it's the HRR intensity markers then we have 40-59% 60- 89% and 90% and above, can we calculate let's say the for the lower end of vigorous intensity ( based on 60% ) and for the higher end ( based on 89%)?
it's all clear, I"m just a little bit confused about the intensity 😅
You can decide on intensity based on the goal and the phase of training of the athlete. Some people may train less frequently at high % and some may train more at lower %
Thank you
You're welcome!
I'm a bit confused: if I use Karvonen, my Z2 is between 146-157, if I use max HR, it's 131-141. Needless to say, the first one wouldn't feel "easy" at all, so which should I use to actually do an 80/20 distribution? I feel like Karvonen would put me in a "yellow" zone, neither easy, nor hard.
That’s hard to say without a lactate threshold test. It’s possible that karvonen would put you above lactate threshold. If you’ve been training for a while LT might be around 70-75% MHR. But there’s a lot of variability to that
@@TheMovementSystem I did a max HR test, that's why I have that range that I use. 141 is about 78% of my HRmax
I have the same result.
My zone 2 from Karvonen is way too high to easy, conversation level running.
Max heart rate works much better for me
may i know what 220 is really means? with references if possible
220-age is just a formula that was developed to estimate maximal heart rate based on age with decent accuracy. I'm actually not sure where the 220 came from.
During the recovery phases of interval training, my HR sometimes explodes.
I'm still recovering, my breathing is still getting easier, but my HR suddenly increases higher than it did in the work phase.
It doesn't happen all the time, doesn't hurt and, usually, it comes back down to where it should be quite quickly.
Have you seen this before?
That's not uncommon necessarily. Heart rate often has a delayed response during interval training where it peaks toward the end of the interval and even after the interval during rest before coming down.
@@TheMovementSystem - That's very reassuring and helpful. Thank you. 😀
Is the Karvonen formula and Mean arterial pressure part of practical applied?
Cual seria la zona ideal para quemar grasa, según esta formula. Gracias
Las zonas de freqüência cardia mas baja queen un mayor porcentaje de grasa. Pero la frecuencia cardiaca mas alta quema mas calories de grasa. No hay zona para quemar grasa.
@@TheMovementSystem que opinas de esta página
www.omnicalculator.com/sports/fat-burning-zone
On the CSCS exam will we be given the Target heart rate and resting heart rate or will we need to find that?
Where do you come up with “Max Heart Rate”
220-age is a ballpark estimate of someones max heart rate.
My calculation Karnoven Formula = MAF formula + 11
Thought the max for Karv is 220?
200 BPM is constant ?
220- age
@@TheMovementSystem sir max human heart rate is ?
Such a complicated method.
A little bit but it has some utility in accounting for variability in resting heart rate. Not everyone needs it but if you’re doing specific heart rate based training it could be beneficial
I’m showing age group 40 to 45 I’m 55. But who’s in the age group
DO NOT USE THIS.
THE MAX HEART RATE IS 220, NOT 200!
You will fail any part of the exam that uses this erroneous information.
Please remove and redo this video!
You might want to watch it again. I use 220 minus age
No one has a max heart rate of 220. This is an example with someone 20 years old.
Thank you
You're welcome!