Does the Nicene Creed have the Filioque addition? About what sin affected, does it look to Augustine and his innovation of sinful nature maybe in Genesis 3? Does it emotion the Ecumenical Councils? Or the one holy Catholic and Apostolic Church and how it has continued into the present? Have you found such things in it?
Been meaning to pick this one up, the Blue Leathersoft one is especially gorgeous Looks like a very good resource for historical study to supplement theological study!
They still have them in the notes and they explain why they chose not to include them in the main text. But I do get that many people don’t like when publishers do that.
It also has to do with the manuscripts we have not all of them have the ones taken out. Do a research on why that is. It makes sense and honestly i like the way this Bible has them in another section
There's an excellent book on the subject called the King James Only Controversy by Dr. James White, who addresses the very concern you have and he does a great job explaining what's going on. It actually makes sense when he shows that some of these so-called "missing verses" probably crept their way into the manuscript tradition through scribal harmonisation, where a scribe borrowed a parallel passage from one gospel and harmonised it with another. For example, Matthew 17:21 being harmonised with Mark 9:29, Matthew 18:11 being harmonised with Luke 19:10, Mark 11:26 being harmonised with Matthew 6:15, etc.@@ryanholmes5875
![Путин и ПЕСКОВ ждут звонка от ТРАМПА 😁 [Пародия]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/sm8iV0SxRHk/mqdefault.jpg)
![BLACK BAG - Official Trailer [HD] - Only in Theaters March 14](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Du0Xp8WX_7I/mqdefault.jpg)
Does the Nicene Creed have the Filioque addition? About what sin affected, does it look to Augustine and his innovation of sinful nature maybe in Genesis 3? Does it emotion the Ecumenical Councils? Or the one holy Catholic and Apostolic Church and how it has continued into the present?
Have you found such things in it?
Been meaning to pick this one up, the Blue Leathersoft one is especially gorgeous
Looks like a very good resource for historical study to supplement theological study!
Yes the blue is very well done. I think it would be a great supplement to theological/historical study!
I have the net Bible and it’s missing verses of scripture
They still have them in the notes and they explain why they chose not to include them in the main text. But I do get that many people don’t like when publishers do that.
It also has to do with the manuscripts we have not all of them have the ones taken out. Do a research on why that is. It makes sense and honestly i like the way this Bible has them in another section
There's an excellent book on the subject called the King James Only Controversy by Dr. James White, who addresses the very concern you have and he does a great job explaining what's going on. It actually makes sense when he shows that some of these so-called "missing verses" probably crept their way into the manuscript tradition through scribal harmonisation, where a scribe borrowed a parallel passage from one gospel and harmonised it with another. For example, Matthew 17:21 being harmonised with Mark 9:29, Matthew 18:11 being harmonised with Luke 19:10, Mark 11:26 being harmonised with Matthew 6:15, etc.@@ryanholmes5875
Looks stiff.
It is on the stiffer side but nothing outrageous for a paste down genuine leather.