Phonological Processes: Assimilation (Part 1)
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 18 мар 2019
- If you find value in my work, please consider supporting it by doing any (combination) or all of the following:
• Like my video.
• Subscribe to my channel (and bang the bell to be notified of future posts).
• Share the video with others.
• Make a PayPal donation to azelinguistics@gmail.com.
• Pledge regular donations as low as $1.00 per month on / azelinguistics .
I will read, and may react to, comments by commenting back or in subsequent videos.
You can also write to me at azelinguistics@gmail.com.
COPYRIGHT: Royalty-free
Pictures: pixabay.com
Sound: / audiolibrary (including 'Game Plan', Bad Snacks; ‘Venetian’, Density & Time; 'Stranger Danger', Francis Preve)
You managed to explain this in an easier and funnier way than my teacher and course book, which are both in my mother tongue. Not only that, it sounds way more interesting in this video than it ever did during class or reading the book.
Mission accomplished! :)
online classes brought me here
Same as me
Same
Than you very much. Now I can understand how to deal with assimilation. You're the best. Keep going. 🙂💫
Thanks for this video. My prof went through this content way too quickly for me so I appreciate this as a resource!
It's great to hear that!
See you around!
Thanks for your efforts, you make things easier.
This is brilliant!
So many thanksss🌼
Thank you, you did a great job explaining this concept that my professor took 2 weeks explaining
lol LIKE
4:58 Assimilation
thanks
the hero i needed at 00:27 in the morning
@@dobbythefreeelf9638 here 4 u
Thank you very much, my lecture was explained this to me but i dont understand what she say and not me all my friends cant understand too. so thats why i came here, thank you very much
Thank you so much. I really need it 🌹
thank you for this video! I have to transcribe a homework to IPA for a phonology class and the teacher asked me to pay attention to the phonological processes.
Brilliant! As a linguistic I thought a brilliant idea. Congrats.
I realize it's pretty randomly asking but do anyone know of a good place to watch newly released tv shows online ?
Thanks a lot. You are very qualified for doing such a video.
See you around! :)
Well done brother!
See you around :)
❤❤Quite well explained 🎉🎉
But needed a little more detail of examples.
Good luck with warm regards. 🌷 🌷 🌷
Thanks a lot! it was really helpful
Thanks for your comment! See you on the next video :)
great vid.
Thak you sir for help.
thank u so much for this video
See you next Wednesday!
I adore your videos! If you don't mind, let me know what are resources that you used for this material x
thanks
Plz , I don't know if you create video for Foreigners , because I'd like to understand the difference verb ending ed followed by consoant, *wanted to* , *worked to* , *tried to* , *said to* , *cleaned that* *turned the* *rolled down* I can't hear ED
Vahit hoca buralara düşürdün be bizi
thankyou sir
Thanks for explaining that✨
I just have a question about "Assimilation of voice". assimilation of voice have two forms, right !
1_Across morpheme boundaries.
2_Across word boundaries.
The type of assimilation of voice across morpheme boundaries is represented in " noun plural marker " the possessive and the singular present tense which agree in voicing with preceding obstruent consonants " regressive ", the Voice /z/ changed to /s/ after a voiceless sound , the same thing happen with the Voice /d/ also.
Ex /
Dogs.. /s/ becomes /z/ to agree voicing with /g/.
when I came to a progressive assimilation i found the same process !! (inflectional ending - s and - z , if preceded by a voiced sound, they become voiced: if preceded by a voiceless, they become voiceless.
Ex/
Girls /s/becomes /z/ to agree in voicing with /l/.
I found this explanations in a lot of sources and I'm puzzled , the two definitions have the same process but different only In "label".
Please, Can you elaborate on that a little bit ?
Thank you so much for the video Sir. I have an exam tomorrow and I got it 😊. Thanks again
I'm so glad this helped. See you around :)
@@AzeLinguistics 🌹
I GOT IT .... THANKEW 😊
Nice
I love the song. 😂
Totally reminds me of the *compulsory* assimilation rules of the Korean language
Give us some examples.
SOUTH EAST AMBRYM (a Malayo-Polynesian language)
In the following problem, separate the possessive morpheme from the noun stems.
Consider the resulting variation in these noun stems and account for it.
a. What phonological process is illustrated here? Argue for your solution.
b. Formulate a maximally general rule for the observed variation.
1. hil hair hilin his hair
2. va˜ belly va˜en his belly
3. luh tooth luhon his tooth
4. asou wife asoun his wife
5. he hand hen his hand
Is this technic American or British?
God bless you
See you every Wednesday!
Hi, thank you very much for this. I have a question. Will the "U" in unthink also be nasalized because of the upcoming n?
/ʌ/ in 'unthink' is indeed nasaled to [ʌ̃].
@@AzeLinguistics Thank you very much :)
Thank you so much I have perfectly understood the lesson . when will you upload the other processes ? Metathesis Coalescence
Thanks for your comment!
There's already a video for that.
I wonder why my professor in college said there wasn't any nasal vowels in English. Maybe she relied too much on phonetic transcriptions as if they were a hundred per cent accurate. I remember arguing that I did hear a nasal vowel in words like "everyone", "man", "one".
To be accurate, there are nasalized vowel in English.
What's the difference between regressive and progressive?
The direction of influence
Good vid bro just a minor spelling error which doesn't matter much. at 3:45 you wrote Hindhi, its Hindi
Thanks for bringing that to my attention. You're right!
it helpful though
i love you,
في حدا فاهم الفونولوجي كثير منيح بدي مساعده؟؟
Thank you sir, but you didn't explain non-contiguous !
Hi, Saad,
There's a Part 2 to this video.
there is no semantics
The semantics season will follow syntax, which is, in turn, after morphology.
It's very useful and interesting but it's AmE pronunciation.
What other varieties of English do you have in mind?
@@AzeLinguistics British English, modern RP it's much different. Therefore you should put in your description, that it is American phonology. But the whole lecture is very interesting.
@@AndrzejLondyn Thanks for your feedback.
I am a student of English Language Teaching department and I don't understand anything from the video. The video was both not enough and too much.
nor sociolinguistics
Now we are in the morphology season. Next is syntax, then semantics, followed by variationist (socio)linguistics.