Well now that it's codified into law, maybe corporations and their officers will learn that people actually have wives outside of work. Leave me the hell alone at the end of my shift
In the USA, some jobs fire you if you don’t answer the phone three times to pick up a shift. They call it and consider it a “refusal”. Three refusals and you’re fired. One such company that does this is MGM Resorts International.
So… they didn’t think this was a given? Sounds like there are shotty bosses or companies why pass a law? I guess it would be nice to have protection when you don’t reply to an email at midnight ???
@@DownUnderDigitals yes, the employees *let* the employers take advantage of them. You don’t need laws to change that. You need balls. You must not understand that?
Virtually all feel-good regulation imposed on employers comes with negatives. The difference between a vibrant healthy economy and a struggling unproductive one is often a result of an accumulation of these negatives. Better results when government just stays out of the way. If you don't like your workplace conditions, tell the boss...or get another job. It's called freedom and it comes with responsibilities.
Well now that it's codified into law, maybe corporations and their officers will learn that people actually have wives outside of work. Leave me the hell alone at the end of my shift
In the USA, some jobs fire you if you don’t answer the phone three times to pick up a shift. They call it and consider it a “refusal”. Three refusals and you’re fired. One such company that does this is MGM Resorts International.
Yeah, it's called, don't answer the phone!👌
Duh! Here's a law to uphold common sense
So… they didn’t think this was a given? Sounds like there are shotty bosses or companies why pass a law?
I guess it would be nice to have protection when you don’t reply to an email at midnight ???
😂 ridiculous that you’ve got to make a law like this.
The employers who ask for more and more and more once your shift has ended are the ridiculous ones.
@@DownUnderDigitals na. The people that let them are.
@@EvoS76 Which would be the employers....🤡
@@DownUnderDigitals yes, the employees *let* the employers take advantage of them. You don’t need laws to change that. You need balls. You must not understand that?
@@EvoS76 You're the one who doesn't understand....I guess you don't even live in Australia, you're clueless...
Virtually all feel-good regulation imposed on employers comes with negatives. The difference between a vibrant healthy economy and a struggling unproductive one is often a result of an accumulation of these negatives. Better results when government just stays out of the way. If you don't like your workplace conditions, tell the boss...or get another job. It's called freedom and it comes with responsibilities.