This is very helpful, but as a note I think it's more intuitive to explain the Archimedean property as : for any real number there is a natural number bigger than it and then use the corollary (there exist 1/n for all r>0 such that so and so) to prove love the good work
@@brightsideofmaths Hello Sir! I'm watching the video again after 7 months I realized everything is much more clear now than it was 7 months ago. I have a question can we simply choose N=1/ε instead of showing for Archimedean property
@@brightsideofmaths Thanks for your reply : ] I follow another channel, too. And the teacher always do scratch work first to find delta (or N) then he chooses delta based on the scratch work. I haven't seen that he applies Archimedean Property- he just lets. He does this during the limits Epsilon- Delta proofs or N-delta M-delta proofs (for infinity).. Could you please tell me the reason why he lets Delta \ N
Superb explanation as usual. You are a gifted communicator. One tiny piece of feedback - when watching videos on youtube there are many times when I want to pause the video to take in what is on the screen, like many other viewers I'm sure. This action always brings up the progress bar with its icons. If the text is written right to the very bottom of the screen it gets covered by the icons and can't be viewed on pause. Even after unpause it takes several seconds for the icons to disappear. An example occurs at the end of this video and I've noticed it on other vids too. Would be helpful in future vids if you left the bottom 5% of the screen blank. More an issue with youtube than your vids but unlikely they will change this anytime soon. Anyway - I hope you keep up the incredible work. Thanks!
Thank you very much! There is a really helpful feedback I also got before. I try to avoid writing at the bottom but sometimes I also want to show the stuff above at the same time and then I really want to use the whole screen. One possibility for you would be to use the pdf versions of the videos while watching the video. However, I try to be more careful in the next videos and try to avoid the bottom of the screen more often :)
Are you finished the series on constructing the basic number sets (R and C)? I've watched all the series you have except for these ones because I want to binge the full constructions and formalisms :)
Thank you! The construction of the real and the complex numbers is finished. However, I will add some videos about complex numbers soon but they are not need for the real analysis course here :)
Just started with this whole series I'm studying computer engineering and now I realised with your videos and explanation that Analysis is actually not that hard atleast on this level tho i had problems with even these simple concepts i guess it really depends on the teacher if the student can learn what they teach so I'm very grateful for you! Thank you!
I like the pace and content of your videos. Personally, I find them easier to follow than my text, so I appreciate the effort you put into the explanations. At the end of the video, you mention the Achimediam Property - I am not familiar with this. Do you have a video that explains the property?
Yes, you can find it here: tbsom.de/s/slm My Start Learning Mathematics series covers the construction of the real numbers. You don't need all the videos for understanding the Archimedian property. And thanks for liking me videos :)
Thank you for The sequence of videos well made lectures though On the example at 3:45 when defining the set of Natural Numbers, they’re both marked as a: so the starting index isn’t defined with the notation (an)n€N as the set N is ambiguous, because When the set of natural numbers begins at 1 then (-1)^1 is -1 as you have graphed while when the set of natural numbers begins at 0, then (-1)^0 is 1 and so the function’s range is corresponding to the index of N and the interesting question becomes whether they’re considered equal because essentially they’re both defining a sequence of alternating 1 units. Like the state of a transistor with their magnetic poles being + or - of course by set comparisons they’re two representations of the set of natural numbers (0,1,…) and (1,2,…) but essentially they’re both defining a state of (…-1,1,-1,1,…) so the starting index does correspond to the initial index of the mapping and they do define a set of two functions each with a differing starting index be it N0 or N1therefore I think n€N is ambiguous without a subscript on the N, there’s a great discussion on Stackexchange about this Natural Number indexing and I think It’s good to mention
Hello. I love the videos. Helping me a lot. Tho i still have a questions. Namely, what exactly is N(Not the N of natural numbers but just the capital N)? What does it represent???
Fun challenge, negate formally the definition of convergence. For a bigger fun challenge, show that the sequence {-1, 1, -1, +1, ... } , given by the rule (-1)^n, does not converge. (Hint, it is not enough to show that the sequence does not converge to a specific number , e.g. 1 or -1, but we must show that it does not converge to any real number)
Wie nennt man die neighbourhood auf Deutsch? Wird es in der Mathematik ebenso mit Nachbarschaft übersetzt? :'D Und wie wird der archimedian properity übersetzt?
Why |an-a| less than epsilon cant be |an-a| less than or equal to epsilon? Or it can be but both definition will prove the same convergence.(As there is always a number between two numbers so we will always have some other epsilon if not the epsilon which generates the case of equal to). Then is there any significance of choosing less than rather than less than equal to. If it cant then the case of equal to must be redundant, if so then how or the expression with equal to must not give proper idea of convergence.
This is very helpful, but as a note I think it's more intuitive to explain the Archimedean property as :
for any real number there is a natural number bigger than it
and then use the corollary (there exist 1/n for all r>0 such that so and so) to prove
love the good work
Yeah, this might be a matter taste for the Archimedean property. Thanks for the explanation there!
yeah at uni we learn it this way :)
Great stuff
You do a great job of filling in those gaps the modern education can leave in a mathematics education 😁
Keep it up!
I am watching your lectures as preparation for my 1st Semester. Thank you very much.
How'd your first semester turn out?
as a greek, im proud of how u pronounce ε , good job !
Sequences and limits? More like “Surely this playlist contains only hits!” Thanks again for making and sharing so many high-quality videos.
Waowww you 100% cleansed all my confusions Thanks Sir!!!!!!!
Glad it helped! :) And thanks for the support!
@@brightsideofmaths Hello Sir! I'm watching the video again after 7 months I realized everything is much more clear now than it was 7 months ago. I have a question can we simply choose N=1/ε instead of showing for Archimedean property
@@sadececansu9 The Archimedean property is given and we have to use it :)
@@brightsideofmaths Thanks for your reply : ] I follow another channel, too. And the teacher always do scratch work first to find delta (or N) then he chooses delta based on the scratch work. I haven't seen that he applies Archimedean Property- he just lets.
He does this during the limits Epsilon- Delta proofs or
N-delta M-delta proofs (for infinity).. Could you please tell me the reason why he lets Delta \ N
Beautiful presentation!
Superb explanation as usual. You are a gifted communicator. One tiny piece of feedback - when watching videos on youtube there are many times when I want to pause the video to take in what is on the screen, like many other viewers I'm sure. This action always brings up the progress bar with its icons. If the text is written right to the very bottom of the screen it gets covered by the icons and can't be viewed on pause. Even after unpause it takes several seconds for the icons to disappear. An example occurs at the end of this video and I've noticed it on other vids too. Would be helpful in future vids if you left the bottom 5% of the screen blank. More an issue with youtube than your vids but unlikely they will change this anytime soon. Anyway - I hope you keep up the incredible work.
Thanks!
Thank you very much! There is a really helpful feedback I also got before. I try to avoid writing at the bottom but sometimes I also want to show the stuff above at the same time and then I really want to use the whole screen. One possibility for you would be to use the pdf versions of the videos while watching the video.
However, I try to be more careful in the next videos and try to avoid the bottom of the screen more often :)
i really like this channel, i really support this great effort i wish success for you in all the fields of your life !
Thank you so much 😀
@@brightsideofmaths
Eine Anfrage bitte; Kannst du eine Serie über Differentialgeometrie machen? Danke
الله عليك يا احمد
Are you finished the series on constructing the basic number sets (R and C)? I've watched all the series you have except for these ones because I want to binge the full constructions and formalisms :)
Thank you! The construction of the real and the complex numbers is finished. However, I will add some videos about complex numbers soon but they are not need for the real analysis course here :)
Gefällt mir, wie du erklärst!😊. viel besser als Professoren an der Hochschule Baden Württemberg. Danke!
Hats off for your good Job.
lots of Love from IIT Bombay
Please upload more video on sequence and series.
Just started with this whole series I'm studying computer engineering and now I realised with your videos and explanation that Analysis is actually not that hard atleast on this level tho i had problems with even these simple concepts i guess it really depends on the teacher if the student can learn what they teach so I'm very grateful for you! Thank you!
Thanks for uploading this series
I like the pace and content of your videos. Personally, I find them easier to follow than my text, so I appreciate the effort you put into the explanations. At the end of the video, you mention the Achimediam Property - I am not familiar with this. Do you have a video that explains the property?
Yes, you can find it here: tbsom.de/s/slm
My Start Learning Mathematics series covers the construction of the real numbers. You don't need all the videos for understanding the Archimedian property.
And thanks for liking me videos :)
@@brightsideofmaths I think I might need all the videos ... Thanks Construction of the real numbers has been confusing me
Good explanation.
Glad you think so!
That is the best convergent definition I have ever seen /read.
Nice! And thanks for your support :)
So, a finite sequence never converges to any number "a"? Since, we can always choose 0 < epsilon < |a_n - a|.
A finite sequence is just a tupel and convergence makes not much sense there.
@@brightsideofmaths Oh, okay. So, a sequence is infinite by definition (in real analysis)?
You're a great teacher, props!
Thank you very much for an excellent explanation. I didn't understand the logic epsilon et N for 2 years. I understand them
now.
You are welcome!
Thanks
hey you told that you will make a lecture series on algebraic geometry or differntial geometry so when you are making it
I try to do this on this year :)
Thank you so so so much !!!
Thank you for The sequence of videos well made lectures though On the example at 3:45 when defining the set of Natural Numbers, they’re both marked as a: so the starting index isn’t defined with the notation (an)n€N as the set N is ambiguous, because When the set of natural numbers begins at 1 then (-1)^1 is -1 as you have graphed while when the set of natural numbers begins at 0, then (-1)^0 is 1 and so the function’s range is corresponding to the index of N and the interesting question becomes whether they’re considered equal because essentially they’re both defining a sequence of alternating 1 units. Like the state of a transistor with their magnetic poles being + or - of course by set comparisons they’re two representations of the set of natural numbers (0,1,…) and (1,2,…) but essentially they’re both defining a state of (…-1,1,-1,1,…) so the starting index does correspond to the initial index of the mapping and they do define a set of two functions each with a differing starting index be it N0 or N1therefore I think n€N is ambiguous without a subscript on the N, there’s a great discussion on Stackexchange about this Natural Number indexing and I think It’s good to mention
The set N is defined in the first minute of the video, compared to the set N0.
Thank u❤
You’re Genius sir.
Does a limit pf a sequence mean the largest value that sequence has?
No for example if we take (-1)'n/n
hey can you also do a video on algebraic geometry and differential geometry
Yes, I can :)
@@brightsideofmaths so when you are planning to do that because I am very excited
Great Explanation!
Glad it was helpful! And thanks for your support!
I have a question. Why is 1 to the power of infinty indetermined?
Infinity is not a well-defined number for powers.
Hello. I love the videos. Helping me a lot. Tho i still have a questions. Namely, what exactly is N(Not the N of natural numbers but just the capital N)? What does it represent???
Thanks! N represents a natural number, an index. So N could have the value 5, for example.
Wow amazing and thank you for making these videos !
I think I might pass real analysis
Great insight I got...
Does a limit of a sequence mean the largest value the sequence can give?
No!
@@brightsideofmaths alright then, so what does it mean exactly?
@@dodysumargo The value the sequence approaches for n to infinity.
@@brightsideofmaths Oh, alright then thanks for the info, im new to real analysis
@@dodysumargo You are welcome! You can join the community forum to discuss more problems :)
You are amazing Dankeschön
Fun challenge, negate formally the definition of convergence.
For a bigger fun challenge, show that the sequence {-1, 1, -1, +1, ... } , given by the rule (-1)^n, does not converge. (Hint, it is not enough to show that the sequence does not converge to a specific number , e.g. 1 or -1, but we must show that it does not converge to any real number)
at 10.28 why is it not 1/n >=1/N cos like it said n>=N
1/2 is bigger than 1/3 but 3 is bigger than 2.
Wie nennt man die neighbourhood auf Deutsch? Wird es in der Mathematik ebenso mit Nachbarschaft übersetzt? :'D Und wie wird der archimedian properity übersetzt?
Neighbourhoood = Umgebung :)
why we take epilon greater than 0 ?why we can't less then 0
Where do we do that?
(The question above got edited)
@brightsideofmaths any where when we talk about limit or related to limit like uniform convergence, point wise convergence etc. (Correction 0)
@@saqibsaqi2402 A metric measures distances and these are non-negative.
Why |an-a| less than epsilon cant be |an-a| less than or equal to epsilon?
Or it can be but both definition will prove the same convergence.(As there is always a number between two numbers so we will always have some other epsilon if not the epsilon which generates the case of equal to). Then is there any significance of choosing less than rather than less than equal to.
If it cant then the case of equal to must be redundant, if so then how or the expression with equal to must not give proper idea of convergence.
< eps and ≤ eps give the same definition.
Great job
Hello, I am a student from mainland China, because of various reasons I can't pay, can you give me a PDF and channels to get your course
Great !!!!
bravo
Why can’t you pronounce your R’s????
Genetic defect!
@@brightsideofmaths Sad!
There are worst things than that :)