My Honest Thoughts on Terrence Howard's Oxford Union Talk
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 8 сен 2024
- 👍If you enjoyed the content, don't forget to give it a thumbs-up👍
============================
🔴I'm LIVE Every Tuesday At 7PM (UK Time)🔴
• Playlist
============================
🎤Full Playlist Of "In Conversation With Christine" Below🎤
• In Conversation With C...
============================
🎥Full Playlist Of My Vlogs Below🎥
• VLOGS🤍
============================
🖇️Full Playlist Of "Clips Of Christine" Below🖇️
• Christine's Commentary
============================
🎧Full Playlist Of "Debunking The Lunacy" Below🎧
• DEBUNKING THE LUNACY
============================
👤Full Playlist Of "Public Outings" Below👤
• Playlist
============================
Support the channel by becoming a channel member for just $5. As a member, you'll unlock bonus videos and exclusive channel perks.
============================
📸Connect With Me On My Other Platforms📸
📷Instagram: / christinegracesmith
📲Twitter: / christinegracex
============================
Everything on this channel is comedy or satire.
============================
#Truth, #Expose, #Exposed, #DebunkingTheLunacy, #Feminism, #RedPill, #HiddenTruth, #Explanations, #VideoEssay, #Essay, #HumanRights, #PsyOp, #Philosophy, #Science, #Physics, #Jung, #Psychology, #Freud, #Nietzche, #Meaning, #Delusional, #Liberals, #Conservative, #Conservatism, #AncientKnowledge, #Scamdemic, #Socrates, #Plato, #Aristotle, #Metaphysics, #Society, #Information, #Education, #JustPearlyThings, #Lessons, #Learning, #Documentary, #Series, #Research, #Studies, #RabbitHole, #IceBerg, #IceBergExplained, #IceBergSeries, #React, #Reaction, #Reacts, #Reactions, #Family, #FamilyUnit, #Traditional, #TraditionalWoman, #TraditionalFamily, #Discussion, #Debate, #Analysis, #Breakdowns, #Breakdown
Christine, I have a PhD in theoretical physics, and I can garantee that you're better at physics than him. He makes absolutely no sense. Ok, let's imagine that what he says is so deep and intelligent that even me, with a PhD in the most complex field of physics, can't understand it. At least, he would relate to some well known facts in physics to refute them or to show how his theory would differ from them. No such things in what he says, he doesn't know anything about physics. Maybe it's a performance to show how easy it is to spread misinformation.
For information, light and sounds are vibrations, but not vibrations of the same thing. For sound, it's vibration of the air (that can be described by pressure and speed vibration). For light, it's electromagnetic fields vibrations, that is electric and magnetic fields that are part of the same 4-dimentional field (electric and magnetic fields are not different by nature, they're different views of the same 4 dimension field, the 4th dimension being time).
He really went off the rails. I used to hate that he got replaced in iron man, but now I understand it had to happen.
He's mad.
The thing he said... .. where did the 1 go 😂😂😂😂😂
He doesn't understand that it's simply asking...
What is a singular of.... what ever.
1 X 60 = what is a singular 60
The 1 isn't a physical thing, it's a way for us to visualise what is being explained, and to make sure that information is accurately conveyed.
He's a muppet of the highest order.
He kept referring to things we have used maths to understand in the 1st place
Oi look, I've discovered this using maths
Oh great, that discovery proven by maths actually disproves maths
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
It's like saying letters don't exist because they only convey sound... or words don't exist because a sentence can be chopped up so there are no legible words left 😂
❤ from Northeast England ❤️
Actually, what he said at the beginning is utter nonsense.
First 1 X 1 = 1, not 2
It's like saying I have ONE, singular apple, so how many apples do I have? I have ONE.
1 X 2 = 2. That's like saying there are two batteries in a pack and I have ONE battery pack of two, so how many batteries do I have? I have TWO.
0 x 1 = zero. It's like saying I have zero single apples. So how many apples do I have? I have zero.
0 X ANYTHING equals ZERO. It's like saying I have NONE of whatever it is we are talking about; therefore, I have ZERO of those items.
Here is where he takes another ridiculous assumption and comes up with an even more absurd conclusion, like "we need to change the law of physics if 0 X 1 equals 0."
0 X 1 = zero, doesn't ELIMINATE anything, or cause anything to "disappear". It's just saying you don't have it.
If we wanted to do a mathematical formula about how many Ferraris I have, it would be represented as 0 X 1. I have ZERO Ferraris. I NEVER had a Ferrari, so no Ferraris were destroyed or vanished into nothingness during the writing of that equation. I NEVER HAD IT TO BEGIN WITH.
That's all 0 X any number means. It simply means you don't have it, not that it disappeared or vanished into nothingness.
He's confusing 0 X 1 = 0 with 1 - 1 = 0. In the latter case, it would be like if I HAD a Ferrari, but then I sold it or totaled it and now I don't have one. That would be 1(Ferrari I HAD) - 1(The Ferrari I lost) = I have ZERO Ferraris now. It didn't disappear, I either sold it and transferred it to someone else, or I trashed it, in which case it goes to a junk heap.
That’s because you use 1B as a representative of something over time, the question deals with physics So 1A already exists multiply it by another you get 2 1x1=2.
Your assuming both numbers represent nothing and is counting to said specific numbers by 1,then when you get too 2 an onward you assume both numbers are real (when multiplying any number above 1)and group them together,if you add the group as a collective and say 7 individuals 1 time is 7 the real multiplication you deal with involves division because in order for you to reach 7 you have to divide it into equal sets of (1)than count.
Or you assume 1B exists and multiply it by 1 or whatever its valued at making the answer 8 or more
Thank you, for writing it all out. 👍
EXACLTY!... Thank You. He need to go back to school ASAP. 😮💨
A big part of this is an actor performing. He knows some physics, but he’s no expert.
You can know a lot about a specific topic without actually understanding anything. His logic is so twisted it is painful.
This sounds like one of those GTA radio shows
Neil deGrasse Tyson has responded to his "theories" and rejected it all 😅
Tyson is a self-important know-it-all and a jerk, but he does know math.
some truth to it? lolz... not, he was spouting utter nonsense 🤣
He is just twisted math into another type of logic. Wonder what he would say about 1+1=? I would bet he would find a way to say that 1+1 doesn't always = 2.
A basic knowledge of mathematics is something everybody can achieve, and it's way less dangerous than chemistry (depending on the chemicals you may want to experiment with)
Terrence Howard is Dunning-Kruger syndrome amped up to 11. He doesn't feel like an impostor at all when saying these things.
That’s cuz there axioms not meant to be taken seriously until studied,you probably don’t want to know and is refusing to be open minded.
@@zayzillions7319 As somebody studying Biochemistry and as somebody who has made several compounds such as Aspirin, Acetaminophen, Bromobutane, Acetanilide, Dibenzylidenacetone, etc. I can tell you from first hand experience that the application of the Axioms of chemistry work in real life. How is his stuff applicable? He is just uttering nonsense while having a psychotic break. Some of my friends have had a similar state of mind for a few weeks after taking to many psychedelics for some time. For him that state seems to be permanent. He cooked his brain.
1 times something, say -1 is simply asking
What is a singular of -1, answer -1
What do I have if I have only 1 zero... I have zero.
Maths is a tool to pass on knowledge... it's not physical like the biscuit I've just dunked in my tea
Frequency etc, can be visualised mathematically. The maths doesn't change because you say the universe isn't fully or even partially understood
Our understanding of elements and the frequencies is through maths. Without maths we don't have ANY understanding of what he's trying to say maths doesn't apply to.
Makes 1 X zero sense
❤ from Northeast England ❤️
this is the guy who said Robert Downey Jr owes him 100 million because he got him the gig as iron Man. his comment about 1 x 0 Is batty. he doesn't understand basic math. he thinks 1 x 0 involves two things coming together for the equation. The 1 and the 0. And then he says how can one of these things disappear? because it's conceptual. If you have zero barrels of beer, then you have zero barrels of beer. The barrels of beer are not a separate thing that get multiplied by zero? WTF??? Stick to acting!!!
that's weird because our CHEMISTRY is unmistaken beautiful
Hey Christine, Terrence is completely wrong. Think about multiplication by the number one like this. If you eat one apple one time, you ate 1 apple. If you eat two apples, one time, you ate 2 apples. If you eat one apple zero times, you ate zero apples.
Troll.
If you change the definition of "multiply" to "add" then 1x2 does equal 3. Is he saying that the concept of multiply is not valid? How does divide work in his world?
Zero is nothing and he's saying if you add another nothing you get something. My wallet has zero dollars. No matter how many zero dollars I add (by not working,) it still has zero dollars.
10:51 "It can be one of two things..." well.. all of mathematics rests on the foundation that "1+1=2" and that's not an assumption, it's one of the first things you have to proove, as a MINT student.
its not just about longitudinal waves oscillating on a different axis than transverse waves. Waves along the electromagnet spectrum are comprised of energy, for example, visible light is comprised of photons. Sound waves, longitudinal waves, as I understand them, are the compression of molecules in the system. As the molecules compress they push other molecules that are in front of them which then move forward and push the next group of molecules, thus propagating the wave. That's why there is no sound in space, because there is so much empty space between molecules that you can't possible compress enough of them together to form a sound wave.
P.S I'm a chemist, not a physicist so there may be some simplification or minor error in that explanation that a physicist could describe better/correct.
The 1 x 1 = 2 is nonsense. 1 group of 1 is still = 1 and 1 group of 0 = 0
Perfect explanation. Try getting his bricked brain to realize that though.
Why are you grouping 1 with itself, in order for you to have a group it has to consist of 2 or more, 1A is real 1B can be real any way you look at it multiplying 1 by another 1 equals 2.
I can apply the rule of 1 to any number for example: 2x2=2 you’d say I’m wrong but I just applied the rule of 1 so 2B represents the amount of times I have/do/get something which is 2 or divide it equally into sets of 1 and count by 1-2.
@@zayzillions7319there is no requirement for a group to have any specific number of members. It can absolutely by zero (let's say it has been anounced, jet noone showed up) and it even can be negative (when people explicidly state, they don't want anything to do with it). So yea:
One group containing one person = one person every time.
Two groups containing two people each = four people every time.
And five groups containing no people each = zero people every time.
Our prof. called this the "envelope-mistake", as in:
having an empty envelope can be misinterpreted as having actual data, since it's different to having no envelope. However (, unles you're only interested in scrap paper) you stil have zero datapoints. Havin ten envelopes within each other, where only one containes an actual letter is still 1¹⁰×1 = 1.
@@randomcat3053 the envelope represents something making it (1), the moment you added the envelope it no longer represents as zero. Just because it doesn’t represent as scrap paper or data doesn’t change the value of the envelope.
Let’s use the penny in a jar method: 1penny x 1jar = a penny in a jar,I got that by putting a penny in a jar (numerically the penny and the jar represents as 2 of something) yet your seeing it as 1 penny and saying that’s 1 thing while forgetting that the jar exists.
@@zayzillions7319 it represents an empty container. One empty container contains zero information and therefore, litteraly, zero value.
I watched a few clips and Terrance likes to use coloration as causation in many of his assertions and claims. like the wave and spectrum of an element could corolate, but is it a causation of something, there he has no proof. Watch the one where he asserts that blackholes don't exist but fails to address the event horizon telescope or Ligo results.
I haven't listened to it yet, but he has been talking like this for a long time
I have known him from his acting he has been in movies and tv since the 90s .
Alright, I'm neither a physicist nor a chemist, and unfortunately, I am not a professional mathematician either, but I do think I understand the basics of maths.
0×X=0
1×X=X
X×undefined=undefined
NDGT, does an EPIC debunking on this
I watched the Joe Rogan interview with Eric Weinstein and Terrence Howard.
What was unveiled is that while Howard IS highly intelligent, he is SELF TAUGHT. And because he's self taught there are HOLES in his understanding of the rules and laws of mathematics.
Watch the Rogan interview and you'll see it for yourself.
Someone tell this guy that Math is the best INTERPRETATION of the how things may work or can be explained. Does NOT mean there is no space for improvement. But what he is saying is NONSENSE. He really need to go back to school.😒
His theory applies physics most, I can apply the rule of 1 to any number and get the same outcome when multiplying two numbers of equal value by denouncing the existence of both numbers as (real)sets and count to them.
Lol, he shouldn't speak on a subject he knows nothing about. He's completely wrong about the identity property.
This isn't just chemistry, it's mainly metaphysics
Not at all. He makes no sense in the spirit realm or the physical one.
@@jeffreysherman8224 and how so? He's literally as accurate as Nikola Tesla was with his creations
@@jeffreysherman8224 coming from God, he's speaking the truth... What he is saying is accurate, you're the blind one... See
In school, I chose chemistry because I performed worse in physics
Tyson did reply to him, he literally did a thorough review of his theories and debunked everything he’s said.
Beryllium is used in nuclear technology. And in space, telescopes , satellites , .
I was never good at chemistry
Terrence Howard ... the real War Machine
Oh lawdy😂
It's how he's using language n the way in which he means it he's correct actually - he's actually giving the basics for time travel - edit : it's the difference between linear n non-linear thinking n people have been conditioned to think in a linear pattern
Nothing linear about numbers or maths. If you have 1 packet of 2 batteries you have 2 batteries (1x2=2), however if you have 1 pack of 1 battery you have 1 battery (1x1=1).
The fucking idiot is an actor that gets told what to say and think for a living. This is what happens when they actually use what little brainpower they have.
Keyword, he used “bisexual” to describe a color…I think we all know where he’s trying to go with this
How much is: Terrence Howard + you?
There’s a second podcast out with him and Eric Weinstein Eric had some issues with his claims but was still supportive and wants to be helpful
As a Biochemistry student everything he says about Chemistry is utter nonsense. There is a reason he dropped out of chemical engineering. He just has delusions of grandeur trying to overthrow the principles that allow us to make pharmaceuticals, plastics, etc. Things you yourself use in everyday life. You can see the products with your own eyes. What has this guy really made? Nothing.
Cheers Christine
Mathematics shortened is maths, not math. So annoyed when Brits pick up Americanisms. I left the video at that point.
This sounds frighteningly like common core to me. Many things he's saying does have some truth to it but the practical concept of what he's saying is wrong.
why not, people believe and worship a floating person with mighty powers.
Maths is Racist ,don't You know😂😂😂😂
Im outta the loop as well
Oh boy... well:
There is ONE Cookie and you put it ZERO times inside a cookiejar => the cookiejar contains ZERO cookies, while the energy of the ONE cookie remains in your hand.
This guy misunderstood some basic math (not blaming him, had to relearn a lot of it myself) and build a theory out of it, wich is interesting in terms of philosophy, but utter noncense in terms of practical math.
"Anything times One is One..." 😶... ok... he just might be dumb...
Christine is perfect chemistry, Very Pretty and a nice personality.
No, there's nothing interesting about an actor who is losing his mind in front of us. possessing secret knowledge is a form of delusion. he might need to be medicated. you should ask a psychiatrist because they've seen this sort of thing a thousand times before.
Kind of what I thought watching him speak his twisted logic. He's lost it. Even this new tiktok generation is smarter than him now.
You just don't get it, and that's okay. But since you don't understand, you should be quite
Only scientists like this comment, "NONSENSE"
Oh mane!
Fix your audio 😬😬
OMG that guy reminds me of a few head ache people in the past. Please stick to better teachers for yourself. Orbital shells and field types. Gamma cutoff and redshift and so on. Particle frequencies as he is trying to imply is smaller. It hurts my head to see such. Your color/light shows the particle absorption lines. I would say he word, math, scienced a salad from things that match in better ways you can see in courses online.
Besides he would be off for the antimatter valley of stability and island of stability. There is a reason for the imbalance and it comes from CERN/fermilab data already done. You can find many good sources for chemistry, optics, physics, some on bioengineering and such. MIT, Harvard, ect. He didn't even touch magic shell model and doubly magic shells. Or decay split pattern. So much he missed and yet cobbled a few things together that are explained a lot better other ways.
I know a wonderland memetic in physics few even get to see parts of. Weird that it even exists in the first place. Mad hatter an anagram for mathed art. ALICE detector and the white rabbit timing ToF. Root OS and trees. Tweedle sets and quantum cats and snark graph theory and color theories and H3 superfluidity boojum. Alice strings and alice rings. There are lots of hidden gems out there. Some good hyper learning and didactic learning paths.
Good luck out there and question everything. Especially things like he said. Some simple kind of religious cattering. You can even tell the ones he is trying to cater to with his setup.
No. Stop it. This guy argues the illogical with logic. It's all nonsense. Don't waste your time. If you start with something that never existed, how do you account for the energy loss that never existed. Stop it
Terrence is not genius at all , he's the new jean claude van dam, Jcvd said the same kind of shit
Meanwhile smartest person to ever grace Hollywood was the “dumb brute” Dolph Lundgren with 3 or 4 PHDs in physics and other science topics.
@@scott8448i know that and he goes to MIT, i'm a Canadian living at France if you understand french and have the opportunity to watch some interviews with JCVD , you will see the same shape of Idea like.modern physic Is false , We hide us a lot of things , our ancestors have a hiden knowledge and blal bla and i forgot i have a PhD on physics