I wouldn't say he is "criticising" her, he is simply pointing out that not everything is as simple as she thinks and cannot be solved as easily... In this case Putin is completely correct
Yes but ultimately greta’s speech is of world powers putting greed first over the constant build of world ecological problems, further cementing the idea that putin says its too hard, costs too much, africa coulda have went solar. No, africa is not a superpower that had invested to make more for generations, greed again :/
I would say that capitalizing on the idea of him "criticising" her is still wrong given that the criticism is very small.... But it obviously seems like it's all criticism because of the BBC editing out all the parts of commending her for what shes done...
Greta thinks it's easy to do all this just because she lives in a rich country with a huge pci. First go learn your economics lessons girl. And boy you don't get industrialization
@@tonyb9735 we want a good life (like in Scandinavia and the west) not only food and water africa is not the reason of global warming and yet we the nes who suffers the most from it
@@tonyb9735 well a lot of africans are dying because of hunger at this point they don't care about if they gonna "probably" die of global warming in about 20 years,they care about what they gonna eat eat today and what they gonna feed their childrens tomorrow and here we're talking about Greta and precisely when she said "stole my childhood" if the good childhood that she lived doesn't look good for her,what we can say about african childrens
@@Magnesius Shes 12 in the head. Been taught too much conservatism and not enough of anything else. Not trying to bash conservatives but you can't just wish good things into existence because people like Greta think we are entitled to them. That's what uninformed conservatives do unfortunately and we should be teaching people to get into politics after they've studied other things or subcategories that build up to the vastness of knowledge and understanding required for politics. It isnt a simple issue to be resolved with simple answers, that's just not how things work in the real world of desperation like Putin is saying here. People in third world countries cant "have their cake and eat it too" without contributing to these issues because it would cost them their livelihood. Again as Putin said, go try and tell all those people to live in even more extreme poverty for 20-30 years to solve all the environmental and social issues for the future and see what they have to say about it. No one did it for them, why should they?
@mcwolfus 1 yes, okay. my little sister once saw a 'save the polar bears' advert on TV. she was convinced it was the biggest problem ever! one that must be sorted immediately! etc etc. it's a child's point of view, where things are simple. she would have loved nothing more than to go on an adventure to save those polar bears. would she have considered anything else? the cost of it? accommodation? how to do it? the dangers? that polar bears are not cuddly friendly animals, etc etc? no she considered none of that. because she's a child. that's greta, living the dream of a little girl, saving the world! it's nonsense. she's a tool for corporations to trick idiots into doing what they want.
It proves the Reality of World hidden by the Western Media. The Competant and Good Leader is Putin (of course he's not the obky one) And the terrible and actually evil ones (they're showing their real faces more and more) are the Western ones. That is a truth that the French have actually woken up to
It's weird, listen to him speak on any matter and you'll have a similar reaction. I know he's accused of awful things but he seems to just exude logic, sense and intelligence whenever he speaks.
What is exactly valid about his "point" ? Isn't it what he's saying is that the human ego, wealth, greed, money, power is not itself the big problem of humanity? This is called conditioning. A child understands life better than adults, because a child is actually able to understand and perceive life in an objective and pure manner, rather than the mind's corruption and control everyone is living in. If we want to go even deeper, the problem itself of humanity is this human thinking focused on things such as money and corrupted systems. Also, as a matter of fact, this planet is dying, scientists also know that, then if we want to "explain to people" that they will eventually live in poverty, isn't "poverty" by definition 'living well so another can live in poverty' since there is no equality in this world, and we are all humans ? These are only "superficial" thinking created by the human mind himself which makes him care about 'money', a piece of paper, which is also a human creation. Humans are the ones who've created all these superficial concepts from the very beginning, combined with superficial thinking, that made this planet itself suffer from an unnatural imbalance. So to "explain that people cannot live in poverty" to her, is superficial, because it is a human creation with human concepts and thinking. And as a child who still have an unconditionned vision about life and about how it SHOULD REALLY BE, she is more right than these leaders only thinking about money, wealth and power. If this earth is about to die, what will all this money serve to? They will just die with the dying planet, and all this caring about money and superficial concepts will be totally pointless because their lives will be threatened. Maybe only then, they will realize they've got it all wrong from the very beginning. She questions the corruption itself about how systemes are put and are working, and that's exactly why they disagree with her, because she threatens their influence and power.
Mōrrigan Phronesis look mate ! Let me educate. First of all Planet is not dying. You say scientist agree on it. Well scientist agree on the fact that climate models are inconclusive. And all the models that predicted global warming, have failed.. and were not able to predict the current climate. Climate depends on many factor and CO2 is not one of the fundamental factors. Water vapor is the most important one. And the paper of science you’re referring or the one with 97% of scientist agree that human activities have affected climate change. Was a survey on just 77 scientists. And the extent to which they have consensus about is still debatable and not mentioned. Plus most of the worlds climatologist don’t agree on climate change. Look you may not be from a third world country, but I am. And I cannot stand your hypocrisy while you could be staying on a heated room with all facilities. We don’t even have 24 hours of electricity. And you want the world to slow it’s economic growth. So our countries can remain poor, hungry. Annually 400 billion dollars is separated for climate change. While 30-40 billion dollars can solve poverty. Because of CO2 our planets ecosystem has never been better. Moreover renewable sources of energy is very expensive. Very very unreliable. He raises a valid point ...” because you should go and tell the hungry kids in Africa that they will still be in hunger cause the planet is dying and there’s no money to provide energy or food for them, then you’d know.
Mōrrigan Phronesis never seen a youth being this misinformed, look I don’t have anything against her nor does Putin. Cause the planet is not dying. Just 100 years ago there were more dangerous disasters. And one more thing.. science says the earths climate is a spectrum it warms for a while then cools for a while and then it’s on repeat. Educate yourself mate before arguing with someone who actually knows facts. Rather than being overwhelmed by emotions of the world is dying do something to help the poor.
Mōrrigan Phronesis Renewable sources of energy is a new source for the rich to get richer. “ renewable sources are heavily unreliable “ that’s bill gates words. The rich can afford renewables but the poor can’t. Fossil fuel is a cheap and reliable source of energy. It could have been the backbone of your country economic development. Now, when the developing countries want to do the same thing .. you are like (no no no). Hypocrisy at its finest. Did you know as she mentions people are dying.. did she know “the number of people dying because of cold is 20 times than people dying because of heat. And you want to cool the planet. “ that is by a scientist in Cambridge. Stop being misinformed and go for the real facts. The history of earth doesn’t start at 1970s like you believe. It started millions of years ago and you could ask the scientist personally they will answer “the earth was warmer back then” and people survived. They will also agree on the fact “that the amount of carbon dioxide on the atmosphere in the past was really really high compared to the levels it is now.” So just stop it. I feel sad for her cause she is being weaponized so the people can make money of her.
@@shalombhatta6419 Apparently you're totally missing the point i'm trying to say. I've never said the poor should stay poor, if not the exact CONTRARY. I also come of one of the poorest countries in the world, which actually explains the whole message i'm trying to send, about the world's leaders sucking out people's money. My words are targetting this exact point : The abusive governements. And i was also pointing a bigger point, which is NOT the climate change itself, i think you should read my comment more than once before arguing back about a message you didn't get anything about, if something, you understood the total opposite of it, since you're so focused on "knowledge and information", which, for me, information can always be changed and controlled, by the medias, that are themselves the governement's and leader's puppets.I didn't really talk about climate change in case you didn't notice. :) What i was trying to say all along is that humans are spiritual beings, who lives in a superficial world full of bullshit, poverty, limitations, corruption, and inequality. Climate change is nothing but a triggering subject to actually start ACTING and THINKING to CHANGE the world to a better world for all of us! That was my point, and this has absolutely nothing to do with what you understood from it. Everyone DESERVES to live and have a happy life, and the planet should be protected and cared of. If climate change isn't real for example, POLLUTION is, POVERTY is, HUMAN GREED is, and so on. These superficial ego concepts that makes life for everyone so shitty, especially for an empath as myself. I don't need to be personally touched by a disaster to feel sorry for others, this world's unfairness and stupidity is making me sick, and for me, this child is nothing but a trigger for people to actually start thinking and try to make a real change by becoming themselves the change they want to see in the world. Climate change itself wasn't the issue of my message, because it has a more pacific and harmonious view toward how human life should be, and i despise any kind of superficiality. The issue here is the societies and systems themselves, and liar politicians that aren't caring at all about humanity's or nature's sake. And there is more to life than power, wealth and money, than the superficial views of politicians and governments. We could all live harmonious and happy life, yet the human ego is so blind that he limits himself to such limited and corrupted concepts. THAT, was my message, not what you understood.
We need to be realistic--thats what Greta is doing. There is a problem, acknowledge it and find solution. No one is demanding a solution in a snap of a finger, we all know this problem cannot be solved in a blink of an eye, but atleast our politicians and oil companies will acknowledge the problem and start brainstorming. Just because it is difficult to solve does not mean there is no solution. Elon Musk is doing something, building an E-cars, announced contest in public for best approach for carbon capture proposal, and many more. If oil companies and our government united to commit to find effective approach then we might have saved many lives and properties. I strongly believe there is a cost-effective approach to deal with this problem, we just need to figure it out and stop delaying.
@@haykelg340 Who told you we don't take any responsibility? That's a dumb statement to start with. What does the development of new greener technologies mean apart from us becoming more conscious of our impact on the planet and striving to minimize it? THINK AGAIN.
Hmm ? BBC is actually fair here. Everyone seeing this will agree with Putin. CNN would never show this. I don't hate Greta nor I'm a big fan of Putin but i'm just stating fact about BBC. If Fox News or Daily Mail posted the exact video everyone would thank them for being fair, not being MSM etc...
@@Sepia1989 Check the full clip sir. They left out what doesnt fit their agenda. They are being more fair than CNN etc that is for certain, but not as fair as they could be.
@@larsswig912 Yes, just because it's obscenely expensive doesn't mean we shouldn't attempt to annihilate the world economy in pursuit of the small chance of succeeding.
@@amanhasnoname1052 bro he finished school This is copied straight from wiki In 1978 Modi received a Bachelor of Arts degree in political science from School of Open Learning[53] at University of Delhi,[54][55] graduating with a third class.[56] Five years later, in 1983, he received a Master of Arts degree in political science from Gujarat University, graduating with a first class[57][58] as an external distance learning student.[59]
Greta: "You stole my childhood" Putin, who literally grew up in an 20qm apartment in a poor neighborhood and spent his childhood getting beaten up: "😕"
@@dxwkx9119 jep, and people don't aknowledge that putin needed to fight hard to get her standard of education. She got it for free and throw away. Everyone can hate or love him, but not many people fought themselves so hard to the top like he did
Somehow I don't think her speech was the typical pre-prepared school drama. If it was then she should really consider an acting career. The real problem is world greed, excess comfort and convenience and the competition to fuel all the greed. People's hearts so hardened except to everything materialistic. Solve these problems and climate change will solve itself.
Mysterious Muffin not really. How does that affect the economies that are causing the majority of the problem (Russia, China, the USA)? Those are the worlds strongest economies. They could all very easily enforce a switch to solar power and wind farms, which would solve a significant portion of the problem. But the answer to that is ‘Africa can’t afford to do it, so we aren’t going to either’. Nope, sorry, that’s just not good enough.
Ultima2876 But the thing is those countries won’t STAY the largest economies if they all switch so drastically, therefore making the situations in Africa and Asia worse. Listen, I’m all for environmental protection and everything, and I consider my politics left wing. However I recognise that it’s not as simple as “let’s just all change and it will all be good”. It’s a gradual process, it took thousands of years for us as a species to even learn to use electricity for example.
Kellen As I said before, I’m not a huge fan of Putin. I’d rather have the former Soviet Union back over him. However you must acknowledge he isn’t being critical of Greta here, in fact he’s supportive of her. However I, as a progressive myself, recognise that sometimes we have unrealistic expectations. Russia is only the powerhouse that it is now because of Stalin’s rapid industrialisation of the nation during the 30’s. However under his regime millions perished, both directly and indirectly due to his policies. Considering how heavy the toll was to achieve that the Russian people would obviously be extremely weary to see that happen again. Therefore is installing some solar panels really worth that happening again? As I said before, I support environmentalist movements and the like, however it takes time for a country to change that much, and as we’ve seen throughout history when we rush things disaster strikes.
that‘s the interesting part. Why a little girl can receive so much attention？Because she is used by the adult. Maybe some big companies? they know if the words come out from a child, people will be more willing to believe.
I agree with Putin, it is easy for people living in developed countries to say everyone should use renewable energy resources or eco friendly products because they are affordable and easily accessible to them but for others in developing and underdeveloped countries it is not easy or possible as they try to find whatever resources to survive and live a good life.
@@Christopher_3191 Correct but it's not just Africa, there are so many countries in Asia and South America as well who cannot afford such amenities but Americans and Europeans like Greta think that they can dictate the world what to do and what not to do just because they feel that they are inferior to others.
Zack Syiem Yes I agree underdeveloped countries should be able to do what they want with their resources. Us in the west have everything. It’s not fair to say what others can make a living with, especially when they have no food or money. She and the people telling her what to say, look elitist and egotistical.
@@josianenagito4300 First of all, don't blanket all developed nations like that. The US has alot to answer for in regards to their constant involvement in domestic affairs of other countries. And this constant blame on the US that they attacked middle eastern countries for their oil is just stupid. 30-40% of the worlds oil is already produced by the US itself domestically. The wars in the middle east are complicated, extremely complicated and oil might of course play some part in it. But there are tons of other factors aswell, ungrounded beliefs of nuclear weapons, ideological differences, islam extremists, proxy wars and other interests. The world is not black and white. You can't put every issue under one single explanation when there almost always is a ton of different explanations at hand.
with an exception that it is not a common sense and logic, since its more than confirmed that people are going to have it much more worse then during covid times due to warming, and what he told that african people want also electric home appliances is a big lie, since Africa is the least contributor to the global warming and greenhouse gasses emissions. Understandable right? So tell me now please, where is that logic.
@@ionphaser7092 what he is saying is that African countries will prioritise the development of the quality of life of their citizens before being concerned about environmental issues (being a developed country usually correlates with concern for the environment). Therefore, it is quite complex as to how to ensure that these countries can develop whilst not exacerbating the effects of climate change over the next 50-100 years. His basic point is that if it were easy to ‘take action’ and solve climate change then it would have already been taken - the issue is that there are so many variables to control for, as well as the fact that the cost of the transition to renewable energy sources will be massive. I think that is a reasonable thing to say, and that tackling climate change should be done in a responsible cost/benefit way so as to protect people’s livelihoods whilst addressing the issue with alacrity
@@NUFCcomps No matter that once africa will want to get more developed, when we have problem now when africa produces 2 percent of global warming contribution and we produce 98 percent of it, so we cant scapegoat 2 percent contributor (2 percents wont save us), no matter how you want to sugarcoat that nonsense, if you thought about it at least for a second.
@@ionphaser7092 I’m not scapegoating them, I don’t know why you’re suggesting that. It’s pertinent to climate change that as these countries develop, they will likely seek out energy sources that are cheaper (fossil fuels). That’s the point, not that African countries are at fault for climate change. If any country is to be blamed, it would be China given that they are the biggest emitter and are making a slower transition in comparison to western countries
Sicko Beats While True to a point. There are things such as Solid Facts. A Biological Male for example is a man and nothing else. A Tomato is a fruit, There are 24 hours in a Day.
Criticism doesn't necessarily mean something bad. Criticism can be healthy and constructive. There is nothing wrong with the title because Putin DID critice the fact that why Greta is doing what she is doing. Stating facts is part of criticism.
His facts are bullshit. These developing countries are not the current issue, but he chose to focus on them, why? Because he wanted to make a straw man. China can still change. The US can still change. Wealth of a country is not determined by carbon emissions, as they are simply a byproduct. A system that is punitive towards high emissions can also be supportive of green solutions. Did Putin mention anything like balance? Or focus on those that can make a change? No. No he just spouted a few pathetic examples, and people lap it up. We have the technology to make the difference needed, and it doesn't all hang on africa using solar!
😠😠 The world leaders is gonna pay very bad for stand against Greta. AND IS GONNA HURT VERY BAD FOR YOU. I DARE YOU!! WE MUST DO GOOD DEEDS FOR THE CLIMATE CHANGE!!!
@@tiyabharati540 In Russia people beyond the capital and St Petersbourg live and die in poverty, taxes increase, and salaries decrease. for example, teachers earn an average of $ 300. budget places at universities are shrinking. what can this person be respected for? for competent foreign policy? perhaps. but not to the inhabitants of Russia.
Greta: You have ruined my childhood. 3rd world bois: Stop Talking ! I need to study for the entrance exam, it's the only chance I have to escape poverty.
What if everything he said was translated false deliberately so that the British who are working will American allies are putting Putin under a bad name, therefore making Putin the one in the wrong.
Ok now hear me out for a sec. Just because a person is not sharing generell opinion with someone else, it dont makes all arguments of his opponent false by definition. I dont like Russias Geopolitics, Economics and Putins foreign policy, but I can agree to this: 0:38. Cause his argumentation includs high truth value that I have to accept, untill anyone who has a real solution to this REAL LIFE problem falsifies it. Now sad enough western leftists and far right thugs and trolls cant think that way, and don't present us real solution, but straight up fantasy ideology.
Climate change is a problem but if you want to help the world going on some rant explaining how it is morally wrong to continue being ignored is not enough. (well maybe in a society that is under extreme conflict under an issue that is ignoring you deliberately without any good reason however here it is lack of resources and funding) You better act within the law to get things sorted.
@@engineergaming5989 well the issue Putin raises is that climate will be extremely difficult to solve in a way that's perceived as "fair" because it's politically impossible for developing countries to switch to clean energy as it would effectively guarantee them 20-30 years of extreme poverty due to it not being affordable for them while switching to "dirty" energy would allow them to develop much faster. Unless we're willing to provide the absolutely massive amount of funding to allow developing countries to industrialize on *clean* energy, they're going to continue burning coal.
I just Love him..He is so intelligent, starightforward, and clear in his thoughts. He is realistic and talk facts instead of hipocrisy as shown by westerners
Dang, Putin not only roasts people for using a teenage girl, he also explains that it's not realistic for countries especially poor ones to just go eco friendly.
Going "eco friendly" is not only expensive, it's super inefficient as well, engineers have already explained that solar panels only perform at 30% and most countries clear out fields just to install them, which makes it not green at all, and then there's wind power, it's so obvious that not all parts of the world has a constant gush of wind strong enough to spin the blades of the windmill everyday, and to top all that they're expensive to create and maintain. So here you go, why aren't you forcing the rich countries instead of the poor ones
@@santiagocortez9554humanity has always managed to do the impossible it just takes us time....we already have a lithium-silicon battery than lasts about 25 times more than its lithium ion counterpart....its expected to be in consumer electronics and cars very soon
@@santiagocortez9554 You mean solar panels convert 30% of solar energy that would go unused otherwise to electricity. That does not make them more expensive than fossil fuels, in fact it's cheaper (link in comment above).
@@unevilGenius well you're talking about it in a first world kinda sense, it's so expensive here in 3rd world countries where one panel's worth of money can already feed a family for a month, they're most usually not produced in our countries which means they are imported adding more to their already expensive price, you don't understand how much of a load that would be to us poor people
Themcplayer 01 Yeah, sure, a side heard a hundred times: we know we should do something, well, yes, but it costs money, we have more urgent priorities, the situation is not as bad as those scientists say, we have still time, they exaggerate to scare us and manipulate this poor kid. And we cannot deny emergent countries’ desire to have a similar level of comfort as us and to make sacrifices ... and I could go on and on forever. This other viewpoint and accurate comment is just the pretext to inaction that Greta Thunberg has been denouncing since months. So much for nuance !
they just want their side of the climate debate. These fools dont realize that there is a whole world's worth of problems out there and there is no ONE magic hammer to fix them all.
Greta Thumberg is the example of how we live in a foolish time frame where a problematic little girl speak to the UN and high podium speaking like a scientist. Shame on her parent that have been using her for years.
Actually I do know a lot about politics, just like you do. Did I ever say that the European leaders and US leaders were angels? no I didn't. In fact, the EU and US leaders are greedy and are causing lots of devastation in The Middle East and Russia is fighting against Daesh and saving Syria from Daesh. But it doesn't change the fact that almost all political leaders have skeletons in their cupboards.
@@mavericksingh835 not her, but the tool kit which she shared on her Twitter is wanted cuz it was clearly misleading and Anti-Indian. So basically, the creator of that tool kit is in the list.
BUT he is wrong. Australia,China, US, Russia, western Europe, and all these petrol states in the middle east POLLUTE the most and are middle income or rich countries not poor
@@edwardr8826 BUT you are wrong...are have at least misunderstood what he said. I suggest you listen to what he said again. He said Africa is the poorest, not the one with the most pollution....Also western europe is quite clean...and so is Australia I believe. I don´t know too much of russia...but I never heard of them when it comes to massive pollution....that would be mainly China, second india...and to a degree, the USA (though that would be mainly Co2).
@@haywoodjblome4768 He’s not criticizing Thunberg. It’s the exact opposite, he’s praising her. He is in fact criticizing the idea which is Greta Thunberg and the adults around her which benefit from it
Putin: points out that it is not easy for developing countries to use renewable energy sources BBC: Vladimir Putin criticises Greta Thunberg's UN speech
Lol This is so true. Not against her, but she grew in a highly developed country where she lived a quality life. Developing countries need to use non-renewable resources because that's how their economy works and asking them to not do so, is like asking the poor to stay poor.
It should be against her. Paper reading, teleprompter little kid who should enjoy being a kid. Her words mean nothing to me at all. Check out the backseat of her free tesla car. Potato chip bags, plastic soda bottles, maybe her choice in foods will let her know that she is nothing to me. Put all your money into saving the earth. Its been thru plate techtonics, bombarded by meteorites, contintental drifts, wildfires, and you think a little plastic bag from the backseat of your electric car is going to save lives? The earth is fine. The earth will just shag us off like a bunch of fleas. Start all over again. Its happened before. The earth is fine, Were the ones who are fucked. Just the earths time to rejuvinate, like flowers in the spring. Or just tell dumbasses to not use pyrotechnics for a baby reveal in a high fire warning area. (I dont care if you have kids or their gender, just dont burn the land.)
Because reality is often disappointing. People feed on unrealistic and unfeasible goals to push a movement. Somehow, those are the ones that get popularized without question.
Zi Wang He is an authoritarian leader, he may be level-headed but his opinion is redundant by default. He is easily handed a platform, where he gets to express himself to an audience that practically worships him. Whilst a few other people who may be even more concise and rational are stamped out, wasting enormous potential.
He’s not criticizing Thunberg. It’s the exact opposite, he’s praising her. He is in fact criticizing the idea which is Greta Thunberg and the adults around her which benefit from it
Exactly! Instead of blaming everyone for ' Ruining' her childhood, she should visit some parts of Asia and Africa and see what childhood looks like in there. They are literally trying just to survive. And here our the great Greta says, everyone ruined her childhood?! How selfish and ignorant!😑
i like how he treated her with seriousness. It is not because she is only a teenager you will say "aw, isn't she cute?". Putin stated a problem to be solved, he treated her with the same respect he has for someone who is in charge of something important.
huh The value of his speech is not tangible to what he does, we’re not supporting Putin. Moreover, we’re just agreeing with his speech. Lumping those two makes no sense on that basis. Anyways if you believe America has a true democracy you’d be disappointed to find out how flawed it is.
Yes, but his speech is very specifically and carefully putting blame elsewhere. He says Africa can't invest in renewable energy because they need to pollute to reach our standard of living, which is fine. The amount of pollution from Africa is negligible. Renewable energy is (was) expensive, but if you stimulate supply for it, you can easily artificially lower the price substantially. By the the Africa gets close to the standard of living of Eastern European countries, we'll have invested enough in renewable energy to make the transition very easy for them. Putin is just trying to find an excuse to not have to invest, because that costs money and doesn't directly benefit him.
@@Blamzy there is a delay between the grammatical error and the dictionary updating. so live it would be a grammatical error but it no longer becomes a grammatical error once its updated
Well, both raise good points. Greta has hit the nail in the head about several topics. Our world is a closed system, which means that while power can be obtained in a renewable manner, it is expensive, and it is impossible to do so with matter [Eventually the materials are too far gone for recicling] and anyone who says otherwise needs to think again. And global warming IS a critical issue that demands immediate attention. BUT Putin is also right in other things. Green energy, while renewable, is also expensive, and not all polymers derived from oil can be easily replaced. And developing nations have limited resources, and will not hesitate to use polluting tech to increase standarts of living faster. That said, resources need to be managed in a more inteligent manner, and remaining resources should be used to aid the transition, not to mantain an unsustainable status quo. Greta might not have all the answers, but she made the right questions. Which is already better than most.
@@YourLocalMairaaboo Greta is not speaking anything . Those arent her words. Do you think somebody her age has enough life experience and a clue about how this world really works ? She is just a puppet and enjoying the attention , beeing treated like the hero that she isnt.
@@its4481 not gonna comment on the puppet thing [I don't want a flame war, as the constant notifications are annoying.] Still, it is true that the debate isn't black and white, and an actual issue is present.
Exactly my thoughts when I heard about Greta. Transitioning to renewable energy overnight is impossible, and berating nations for not being able to do so is both unfair and unrealistic. It's far more complicated than it seems, and to do it in such a rapid pace would mean you have to ask the populace to endure hardship for several years, because you would have to phase out and replace a lot of the existing infrastructure to accommodate the rapid change, hence why the solution to climate change is slow, otherwise it would be too unbearable. Greta is actually quite the hypocrite. The only reason she can say those things is because she lives a comfortable life. Stole her childhood? Face people who are actually from Africa and Asia, see if you can keep a straight face saying that to them face to face without facing immedaite backlash from the crowd of Africans and Asians fighting everyday just ro survive and demand that they do something about climate change whem they can barely feed themselves.
She's not talking about poor Asian and African countries tho. She's talking about rich industrialized countries that are still mining coal and using oil for profit.
@@simenkunicekream Yeah. "Development" is a progress not just simply an altering process where "change" can be both and interpreted in distinct ways. Putin refers to economic reality and what people in third world actually want.
Well he does makes sense but Not THINKING of solution is not a valid argument or decision either....the thing remains that if we think about these complex issues we can get a middle ground somewhere but if we throw them for no reason other than we don't think it's possible then I don't know why people are called intellectual.
@@shyamsingla716 he didn't say to throw these ideas out for no reason. He basically said it's more complicated than it seems, expensive, and unrealistic. And you're an intellectual?
He is has stolen billions in corruption as his populace cant afford shoes. Let him speak well, and hide the fact he is one of the most evil people on the planet. He alone has in his pockets more money than the u.s.a solar energy investment(which is greater than any other energy) in the year 2019. Just him. He talks like poor people pay for energy...poor people cant afford light bulbs. Like much of his country cant.
@@danesesse Brainwashed Trump supporter alert. You can tell by the hilarious use of parenthesis xd. YOU WISH American politicans could be so eloquent and straight-forward. Eat up the lies and keep paying them to show your 'support' lol
@@vick7848 i am not american or a trump supporter. Is putin the opposite of trump? You assumption confuse me. I was critizing putin... how does that make me a trump supporter. Even if you though I was defending the american president, that is Biden not trump. Are you lost?
really? I saw him recently holding a monologue for more than two hours, ranting on and on and on and on about how the West was ruining it all for his ambitions...
@@jayeshjadhav5575 And yours because Greta is right. Sorry if your father taught you feelings trump facts but they don't. Sorry he told you blind worship of a criminal dictator and BS is a good thing.
@@Mrdegaulle1 actually he was ask a question about her ideas and what he said was true, especially about Africa. Oh, and the world is complicated. You see that as manipulative I see it as reasonable honesty.
@dswarriors People in the developing world are not stupid. They see Ms. Thunberg on a yacht sailing across the Atlantic. Their children don't have shoes to wear. They see her giving speeches at the UN. They would do anything to have their kids go to school. They see her acting like a petulant child, glowering and grimacing. They teach their children how to behave with respect in public. They see her acting like an entitled brat. They teach their children to give in order to get.
@@baekin-8258 The New Yorker magazine dated August 30 2019, describes Ms. Thuneberg's transatlantic trip. The boat, the Malizia 2, left Portsmouth on August 14 2019. She arrived in New York City before Aug 23 2019. On the boat. You can find this article online, ready for your viewing pleasure, and hopefully education. Since you like to impugn people for reporting facts I hope that you take a moment from your outbursts to actually learn something.
@@atlasknox7514 sorry but USA has strict pollution controls and is cleaner than Europe. Paris Accord just wants USA to pay for everyone else's pollution control.
People Health Truth before I’ve been in US I thought it was polluted af. I’m from Eastern Europe. Except some bigger cities i was way wrong. Japan is the cleanest country I ever been though.
@Stonehaven I love how everyone criticises the BBC for being "too left" or "too right". I can sit here and be smug about how stupid all these arguments are because everyone just sees them as the enemy through their jaded eyes.
Stonehaven accept the BBC is run by the conservative government. Of course they’re leftist when portraying Corbyn in pictures it photoshopped itself that he was Russian. The BBC is the running governments propaganda machine.
I was just settling into what Putin had to say, which I am sure is more worthwhile hearing than any of the b.s dripping from the mouths of leftard activists.
Anyway he was just making a bull-shit argument. It's like someone trying to get off the hook by talking about homeless people, when apprehended for massive tax-fraud: "Why don't you go to the homeless and explain why they need to pay taxes?"
So just to be clear: Putin isn’t criticizing Greta or her cause, but rather the mechanism behind the cause? Title should’ve been “Putin questions how realistic the plan is”
African soldier : What am i doing in this chat ? There's no water here ? Lobomyr put me here !... something confusing about Greta...? Please let me go !
pretty much common sense, you have to be mentality deficient not to understand this. and the sad thing, most people who agree with greta are, a child ruling in the world of adults, that's how low the western society has stooped, it's pathetic and laughable.
@@tvens8567 the uk bombed one million people in Iraq and the USA supply weapons to Israel which are used to as a genocide so really every country is just as curupt as the next
@@anastasiapopov7250 LOL. Like you need to kill someone with your own hands to be responsible for it? Putins responsible for death of thousands of people
@@tvens8567 How many people did USA kill since George Bush became president to now? There is no such different. You just hate him because media paints that way. They don't give a fuck about us. That's a fact.
@@bud389 I supported Trump with my vote. I'm not hating on him. The left though.. goodness. But even Trump says too much. Putin just sounds like a real leader when he speaks. I'm sure we don't hear everything about him that he does or that has happened.
BBC: "Putin is evil and here's why!" Audience that read what he said: "... nothing wrong with what he said. He was right and gave a sober, balanced take." BBC: Pikachu
@@Ali_Nar They didn't use the word evil. It doesn't mean the title does not heavily imply that he's mean. And BBC regularly insists that he's the most evil man on the planet.
@@NikolaAvramov If you view this title as negative then you are being rather too sensitive. No? Since when was "X criticizes Y" a negative thing? It's a statement. Just because other videos might (even though I have no idea which videos you are referring to here..) call him bad, doesn't mean that this video is as well. And to the other guy: It's typical on both sides of the media spectrum to give off bias. Since when was Russian news not biased towards the president in an abnormal way compared to other more democratic countries?
You say "you guys", most of them aren't genuine people. They're shills, trolls and activists. The whole reason they've turned Greta into the face of climate change activism is because you can't criticize their words when they say it through the mouth of a child - or else they'll call you "hateful", "bully", etc. It's faux outrage.
Well older people should listen more to her, because she can be a teenager and everything, but it's doing what everyone refuse to do, That is doing a lot of mess to make the younger generation angry, make the governments notice something, then it's governments responsibilities to help the developing countries with clean energy and use clean energy themselves, and remember most of the co2 emissions comes form the us China and Russia, all developed and industrial countries.
To be fair, having world that is hasn't been wrecked by global warming seems to be the interest of the majority of today's younger generation. I don't want to have in a world with oceans covered in plastic and all the rain forests cut down. What about you Mike? Do you have any kids that you are close to?
@@NomadicWanderer11 thing is, everyone wants a clean environment and no climate change. What Putin says is that none of this youth would want to live in poverty in order to achieve this.
Just being emotional and crying on the camera doesn't solve all the problems... Madam you have zero percent idea about the reality in third world countries... You live in Sweden !!
The huge problems aren’t the poor third world countries, it’s China a second world country and China can change if politicians push them into changing their industry, but they’re to greedy to do that. That’s basically what Thunbergs most famous speech was about.
We can scoff all we want but it wasn't a year since her first UN address that the whole world went into lockdown. When little people cry it brings about change.
@@TosoToco So true. The entire west now afraid to stand up to China. Remember that hole in the ozone that was such a big deal in the 80s and 90s? Well China has picked up the slack where we left off. It's back only in a different place and nobody is talking about it even though the British Antarctic survey is well aware.
@@chrisdeep8417 imagine outsourcing almost all production on the planet to one country and then blaming it for producing (more production = more waste) too much. China is not guilty. Try to produce youf shit by yourself instead of concentrating it in industrial center of the planet
If there are many likes, the people will know that putin is right i suppose so i suggest liking. Plus, the title didnt said something wrong about putin's speech, is is 50-50. It just said "criticising" and it's not a bad thing.
Yeah I am confused too, as one of those gen-z's, Greta's view is inspiring but looking at the bigger picture its impractical unless some revolutionary technology comes up, but if we don't even try the technology we are talking about won't come.
his responve was manipulative and pretty stupid at the same time. thtas the response anyone not willing to give up his seat would say. its like saying greta you understand that this old lady want your seat when she is actually saying that would should all get off the bus
:: I don't think that 😅 It would've been manipulative if he said everything that other "politicians" said and took Gretas side🤷🏽♀️ He's the only one who explained why it was not right to use 16 year old as a weapon to your personal political success. I personally don't really like some interviews that's he's given but this is definitely not one of them. 🤭
Apollox44 Pollo Here we go again degrading ones with different opinions 😕 Calling someone foolish just because you don't agree with them is "childish" (as you say 😏). Please if you have real argument we can have mature conversation but if you don't, kindly scroll down and stop spreading negativity 😊I never disrespected you 'cause of your opinion and I expect the same 🙏🏼
Apollox44 Pollo We're on the same page on that 👌 I definitely think this whole "Green campaign" is nothing but making someone's pocket full 😬 I said I agree with him ONLY about" Greta issue" 🤷🏽♀️
What is and isn't realistic is often subjective. There is no physical law that prevents humans from acting in a way that reduces the damaging effects of human activity on the Earth's environment and, therefore, reduces human suffering in the future. But many deniers act as if there is.
I totally agree. Someone shamed me for the fact that I "still use airplanes" to go home once a year to visit my family who lives on the other side of the ocean. They said that I should "put the interests of the planet" over my family and just don't go to visit them anymore - period. I'm sorry but I can't put "the interests of the planet" over my family. I should take a ship - okay, well I would do that if that is the only alternative (I don't want to be considered a "bad person"), but i wish that ships would be a) cheaper and b) go on a regular basis.
I dont get why you guys think BBC is partisan here? He did critique her, that's not a lie. His critique is dumb as hell as well so i don't get your hard on for the guy.
@@ElenaKomleva First get your facts straight, if we r soo much backward then why to invest in our countries, take advantages of our resources. And if we r soo backward donot use our vaccines. Soo Ungrateful you people are Bite the very hand that feeds you
@@ElenaKomleva clap can be done by 2 hands only. Your country give us scholarships, your companies work in India, your country's leader Reagan incorporated ISIS, Al-Qaeda. What do you think what lead to such dictator. Your country's failures and world domination plans. If we r not ruled by Britishers and they wouldn't have taken 45$ trillion from us. Who would be working for whom. You depend on us for vaccines. You people destroyed whole middle East and North Africa for your benefit. And today u people claim to be humanitarian one. Get your eyes open. We r runned by these dictators is because of western world only. Because without them we will be same as middle East countries.
The guy has corruptly stole 200 bullion from russian mostly with oil sales. He alone has stolen more than the u.s.a invested in solar in 2019(thats more than fossil fuels by the way). The world isnt that complicated. He who profits from oil, makes the arguement people who cant afford light bulbs should want something that harms their lives. He is one of the most corrupt evil people on the planet. Dont be naive and listen to him. 35% of his country cant afford a second pair of shoes as he is one of the richest people ever.
@@danesesse stop living in jealousy of someone that has it way better than you will ever have. Focus on what you can control. Quit worrying about other people.
@@yungpunk3522 even if Putin did it, what can you do? None. So it is better to focus on things that you can actually do, let the big shots fight themselves, we don't have the power to solve things that are beyond us, we basically live in a different world than them.
@@hardwares Yes and there is a difference. "We need to be realistic" sounds like he's opposed to enviromental idealism. But he literally said we can't but support those ideas and we need to align our expectations within the area of possibilities
@@jamesfranco5939 Oh ok, that sentence made him look like a villain who betrays the MC with a single sentence. "We need to be realistic" and then proceeds to do villainous thing. Your explanation makes more sense.
Every time I watch Putin speak I realise he is the only true leader of the world. His answers are so concise and thought out that you cannot help but agree with him!
@gillysuit2 www.novayagazeta.ru/news/2019/09/04/154966-pripodnyavshemu-zabralo-na-shleme-rosgvardeytsa-kirillu-zhukovu-dali-let-kolonii Proofs about story with rosgvardian guy, u can auto translate it if u want
There is nothing wrong with constructive criticism. You just have to have into account that you must discuss it in a manner as objective as possible, and not focus on who is exposing the viewpoint, but on the arguments themselves.
Centuries ago western countries started their industrialization without ecology concerns. Today, based on that, and colonialism (read: plundering Africa&Asia), they are rich and would like to stay such by, among other things, preventing poor nations to develop. Those poor nations must try to industrialize, but can not affort to mind Greta's eco histery. When as rich as SWE and USA, talk to them again. They shall have an open heart, I have no doubts.
Nope. Climate action actually explicitly states this idea of carbon-offset to allow poorer countries to evolve. We, as far richer countries, have a duty to reduce our carbon enough (aka carbon negative) that developing countries can invest and develop without fear of adding to climate change. This is, of course, with the caviat of getting those countries to switch as quickly as possible to sustainable and green economics, but it's well understood by everyone that we, who have the technology, need to support those who don't. Pretending like the world's top scientists haven't already thought of this is pure propaganda at this point
Piddle Hide what’s so bias about the title. Do you even know the definition of criticise. It’s “indicating faults in a disproving way”. The fault he indicated was that it’s not a problem and she should be thankful and he disproved her by saying people in Asia and Africa wish to live her privilege life. Yes we know the BBC is bias but if you want to prove it, your statement doesn’t prove it in the slightest and even makes you look bias.
I think they do but it's like them picking fun of trump for bloody drawing a path for a hurricane with a sharpie can u rlly blame them it's totally reasonable 🤣😂 he just whipped out a pen and... Oh god I can't.. 😂😂😂
It's not really criticising Putin. With the exception perhaps of putting the word criticising in the title with its connotations. But people forget that criticising is as mild as pointing out an error (and is therefore good and necessary)
I wouldn't say he is "criticising" her, he is simply pointing out that not everything is as simple as she thinks and cannot be solved as easily... In this case Putin is completely correct
Yes but ultimately greta’s speech is of world powers putting greed first over the constant build of world ecological problems, further cementing the idea that putin says its too hard, costs too much, africa coulda have went solar. No, africa is not a superpower that had invested to make more for generations, greed again :/
Yeah, that is criticism.
There is nothing wrong about pointing things out. Idk why all the defense
I would say that capitalizing on the idea of him "criticising" her is still wrong given that the criticism is very small.... But it obviously seems like it's all criticism because of the BBC editing out all the parts of commending her for what shes done...
Greta thinks it's easy to do all this just because she lives in a rich country with a huge pci. First go learn your economics lessons girl. And boy you don't get industrialization
Putin is usually completely correct.
At least he argues with his brains, and not his emotions.
thats why people make him out to be evil, because he is a man of pure logic and facts
I always listen to him before those headshit democrats that hate Russia
People who are heartless cannot be persuaded. They are going to blazes.
Logic dictates we SHOULD do something about it.
Yeah thunberg is a crazy kid
"People in Africa want to be as wealthy as people in Sweden"
Truth have been spoken.
should be an Asterisk on there because not everyone is poor in Africa LOL.
@@prettyalina7237 Imagine being a billionaire but have no road to drive Lamborghini.
@@tonyb9735 we want a good life (like in Scandinavia and the west) not only food and water
africa is not the reason of global warming and yet we the nes who suffers the most from it
@@tonyb9735 well a lot of africans are dying because of hunger
at this point they don't care about if they gonna "probably" die of global warming in about 20 years,they care about what they gonna eat eat today and what they gonna feed their childrens tomorrow
and here we're talking about Greta and precisely when she said "stole my childhood" if the good childhood that she lived doesn't look good for her,what we can say about african childrens
@@tonyb9735
Lmao, go and explain it to the mother whose child is dying because of hunger!
He's not criticizing Greta, he's condemning who's using her
who's using her? what evidence do you have for this?
@@afgor1088 so called Liberal woke politicians & pseudo-liberal activists & media.
@@afgor1088 You think that the girl just popped out from somewhere to speak in UN Climate Action Summit? :D
@@Alexidrum ok cool. So wheres your evidence
@@afgor1088 No need for evidence but common sense.
Basically he is saying not everything is as simple as a 17 year old girl thinks.
She's not 17, she's 12 bruh, and is extremely clueless about the real world
@@Magnesius bruh
@@Magnesius Shes 12 in the head. Been taught too much conservatism and not enough of anything else. Not trying to bash conservatives but you can't just wish good things into existence because people like Greta think we are entitled to them. That's what uninformed conservatives do unfortunately and we should be teaching people to get into politics after they've studied other things or subcategories that build up to the vastness of knowledge and understanding required for politics. It isnt a simple issue to be resolved with simple answers, that's just not how things work in the real world of desperation like Putin is saying here. People in third world countries cant "have their cake and eat it too" without contributing to these issues because it would cost them their livelihood. Again as Putin said, go try and tell all those people to live in even more extreme poverty for 20-30 years to solve all the environmental and social issues for the future and see what they have to say about it. No one did it for them, why should they?
@@Charlie-nc3cp ROFL she's not a conservative, she's a conservationist. Conservatives are the ones peddling oil.
@@Magnesius still conservative on the political scale.
BBC is smart they cut the part where Putin says "what if kids in Africa wants to live like thunburg"
they ran out of storage. They use an 240p and 2 GB smartphone.
@@ndave2633 they use nokia 3310
Oh snap
she is basically living the dream, travelling around 'saving the world' it could be a disney cartoon series...
@mcwolfus 1 yes, okay. my little sister once saw a 'save the polar bears' advert on TV. she was convinced it was the biggest problem ever! one that must be sorted immediately! etc etc.
it's a child's point of view, where things are simple. she would have loved nothing more than to go on an adventure to save those polar bears.
would she have considered anything else? the cost of it? accommodation? how to do it? the dangers? that polar bears are not cuddly friendly animals, etc etc?
no she considered none of that. because she's a child. that's greta, living the dream of a little girl, saving the world! it's nonsense. she's a tool for corporations to trick idiots into doing what they want.
Love him or hate him
He's speaking straight facts here
King Thimio SHO ME DA WAE BRUDDA
@@rameezhalani5593 WE HAVE TO FIND DA QUEEN FELLO BRUDDA
I agree with him
Hate him but he's right this time
@Paul Gurnic Не понял
How right he is. It's a sad state of affairs when, once again, the President of Russia talks more sense and is more honest than any Western leader.
Love him and BHARATIYA PM🇷🇺🇮🇳♥️
It proves the Reality of World hidden by the Western Media.
The Competant and Good Leader is Putin (of course he's not the obky one)
And the terrible and actually evil ones (they're showing their real faces more and more) are the Western ones.
That is a truth that the French have actually woken up to
It isn't sad, it's time to pick our heroes and villains again.
@@iammakbiswas I thought you'd be more fond of the Ukrainian corrupt Nazis in this conflict Adolf?
thats why russia is winning
A million things you can criticize Putin for, this isn’t one of them. Everything he said was spot on and correct.
Yeah, he says that, but that's not what he does.
His mouth isn't very his money is at
It's weird, listen to him speak on any matter and you'll have a similar reaction. I know he's accused of awful things but he seems to just exude logic, sense and intelligence whenever he speaks.
@@sheev9959 what the fuck
@X O says nope but no evidence to support 👏👏
If a former spy says," people are using her", then it must be right
Was he a spy for the government or something?
@@lucalalsie5653 ya for the Government.
Putin was an old KGB agent
@@generalkenobi5173 kenobi, i thought you said you were not brave enough for politics
@@mangored209 its a new assignment yoda told me to take on i have no choice.
This is not a critical. He is raising a valid point.
What is exactly valid about his "point" ? Isn't it what he's saying is that the human ego, wealth, greed, money, power is not itself the big problem of humanity? This is called conditioning. A child understands life better than adults, because a child is actually able to understand and perceive life in an objective and pure manner, rather than the mind's corruption and control everyone is living in. If we want to go even deeper, the problem itself of humanity is this human thinking focused on things such as money and corrupted systems. Also, as a matter of fact, this planet is dying, scientists also know that, then if we want to "explain to people" that they will eventually live in poverty, isn't "poverty" by definition 'living well so another can live in poverty' since there is no equality in this world, and we are all humans ? These are only "superficial" thinking created by the human mind himself which makes him care about 'money', a piece of paper, which is also a human creation. Humans are the ones who've created all these superficial concepts from the very beginning, combined with superficial thinking, that made this planet itself suffer from an unnatural imbalance. So to "explain that people cannot live in poverty" to her, is superficial, because it is a human creation with human concepts and thinking. And as a child who still have an unconditionned vision about life and about how it SHOULD REALLY BE, she is more right than these leaders only thinking about money, wealth and power. If this earth is about to die, what will all this money serve to? They will just die with the dying planet, and all this caring about money and superficial concepts will be totally pointless because their lives will be threatened. Maybe only then, they will realize they've got it all wrong from the very beginning. She questions the corruption itself about how systemes are put and are working, and that's exactly why they disagree with her, because she threatens their influence and power.
Mōrrigan Phronesis look mate ! Let me educate. First of all Planet is not dying. You say scientist agree on it. Well scientist agree on the fact that climate models are inconclusive. And all the models that predicted global warming, have failed.. and were not able to predict the current climate. Climate depends on many factor and CO2 is not one of the fundamental factors. Water vapor is the most important one. And the paper of science you’re referring or the one with 97% of scientist agree that human activities have affected climate change. Was a survey on just 77 scientists. And the extent to which they have consensus about is still debatable and not mentioned. Plus most of the worlds climatologist don’t agree on climate change. Look you may not be from a third world country, but I am. And I cannot stand your hypocrisy while you could be staying on a heated room with all facilities. We don’t even have 24 hours of electricity. And you want the world to slow it’s economic growth. So our countries can remain poor, hungry. Annually 400 billion dollars is separated for climate change. While 30-40 billion dollars can solve poverty. Because of CO2 our planets ecosystem has never been better. Moreover renewable sources of energy is very expensive. Very very unreliable. He raises a valid point ...” because you should go and tell the hungry kids in Africa that they will still be in hunger cause the planet is dying and there’s no money to provide energy or food for them, then you’d know.
Mōrrigan Phronesis never seen a youth being this misinformed, look I don’t have anything against her nor does Putin. Cause the planet is not dying. Just 100 years ago there were more dangerous disasters. And one more thing.. science says the earths climate is a spectrum it warms for a while then cools for a while and then it’s on repeat. Educate yourself mate before arguing with someone who actually knows facts. Rather than being overwhelmed by emotions of the world is dying do something to help the poor.
Mōrrigan Phronesis Renewable sources of energy is a new source for the rich to get richer. “ renewable sources are heavily unreliable “ that’s bill gates words. The rich can afford renewables but the poor can’t. Fossil fuel is a cheap and reliable source of energy. It could have been the backbone of your country economic development. Now, when the developing countries want to do the same thing .. you are like (no no no). Hypocrisy at its finest. Did you know as she mentions people are dying.. did she know “the number of people dying because of cold is 20 times than people dying because of heat. And you want to cool the planet. “ that is by a scientist in Cambridge. Stop being misinformed and go for the real facts. The history of earth doesn’t start at 1970s like you believe. It started millions of years ago and you could ask the scientist personally they will answer “the earth was warmer back then” and people survived. They will also agree on the fact “that the amount of carbon dioxide on the atmosphere in the past was really really high compared to the levels it is now.” So just stop it. I feel sad for her cause she is being weaponized so the people can make money of her.
@@shalombhatta6419 Apparently you're totally missing the point i'm trying to say. I've never said the poor should stay poor, if not the exact CONTRARY. I also come of one of the poorest countries in the world, which actually explains the whole message i'm trying to send, about the world's leaders sucking out people's money. My words are targetting this exact point : The abusive governements. And i was also pointing a bigger point, which is NOT the climate change itself, i think you should read my comment more than once before arguing back about a message you didn't get anything about, if something, you understood the total opposite of it, since you're so focused on "knowledge and information", which, for me, information can always be changed and controlled, by the medias, that are themselves the governement's and leader's puppets.I didn't really talk about climate change in case you didn't notice. :) What i was trying to say all along is that humans are spiritual beings, who lives in a superficial world full of bullshit, poverty, limitations, corruption, and inequality. Climate change is nothing but a triggering subject to actually start ACTING and THINKING to CHANGE the world to a better world for all of us! That was my point, and this has absolutely nothing to do with what you understood from it. Everyone DESERVES to live and have a happy life, and the planet should be protected and cared of. If climate change isn't real for example, POLLUTION is, POVERTY is, HUMAN GREED is, and so on. These superficial ego concepts that makes life for everyone so shitty, especially for an empath as myself. I don't need to be personally touched by a disaster to feel sorry for others, this world's unfairness and stupidity is making me sick, and for me, this child is nothing but a trigger for people to actually start thinking and try to make a real change by becoming themselves the change they want to see in the world. Climate change itself wasn't the issue of my message, because it has a more pacific and harmonious view toward how human life should be, and i despise any kind of superficiality. The issue here is the societies and systems themselves, and liar politicians that aren't caring at all about humanity's or nature's sake. And there is more to life than power, wealth and money, than the superficial views of politicians and governments. We could all live harmonious and happy life, yet the human ego is so blind that he limits himself to such limited and corrupted concepts. THAT, was my message, not what you understood.
"we just need to be realistic". Golden words !
We need to be realistic that we are destroying the planet and we don't take any responsibility about it.
We need to be realistic--thats what Greta is doing. There is a problem, acknowledge it and find solution. No one is demanding a solution in a snap of a finger, we all know this problem cannot be solved in a blink of an eye, but atleast our politicians and oil companies will acknowledge the problem and start brainstorming. Just because it is difficult to solve does not mean there is no solution. Elon Musk is doing something, building an E-cars, announced contest in public for best approach for carbon capture proposal, and many more. If oil companies and our government united to commit to find effective approach then we might have saved many lives and properties. I strongly believe there is a cost-effective approach to deal with this problem, we just need to figure it out and stop delaying.
@@hiimain7932
>Greta
>Realistic
LMAO
Sugarcoating bad situation no matter how you like it to be via rose glasses, its like a meme "i am ok with the events that are currently unfolding".
@@haykelg340 Who told you we don't take any responsibility? That's a dumb statement to start with. What does the development of new greener technologies mean apart from us becoming more conscious of our impact on the planet and striving to minimize it? THINK AGAIN.
Bbc really? He's pointing out the facts.. He's barely criticising...
They cut this so carefully as well, his full answer is much more factual.
@@radagast1184 how is this relevant to the video?
@@radagast1184 And how is what you asked relevant to what we are discussing?
Hmm ? BBC is actually fair here. Everyone seeing this will agree with Putin. CNN would never show this.
I don't hate Greta nor I'm a big fan of Putin but i'm just stating fact about BBC. If Fox News or Daily Mail posted the exact video everyone would thank them for being fair, not being MSM etc...
@@Sepia1989 Check the full clip sir. They left out what doesnt fit their agenda. They are being more fair than CNN etc that is for certain, but not as fair as they could be.
This isn’t him criticizing greta, but instead pointing out it would be a lot harder to do than she thinks
But just because it's hard doesn't mean it shouldn't be done.
@@larsswig912
Yes, just because it's obscenely expensive doesn't mean we shouldn't attempt to annihilate the world economy in pursuit of the small chance of succeeding.
N75911
We are going to have to pay for this no matter what. We will have to adapt. The human race is at stake.
@@N75911_ economies can recover sooner or later, but the earth won't recover unless we do something, it'll keep getting worse and worse.
Lars's Wig agreed
He is definitely more experienced than a girl who left her schools.
@RadioTSM {Operator Teddy Timis} true.
Yes
She didn’t finish any school
So as most of the leaders and chief Ministers and even prime minister of India!
@@amanhasnoname1052 bro he finished school
This is copied straight from wiki
In 1978 Modi received a Bachelor of Arts degree in political science from School of Open Learning[53] at University of Delhi,[54][55] graduating with a third class.[56] Five years later, in 1983, he received a Master of Arts degree in political science from Gujarat University, graduating with a first class[57][58] as an external distance learning student.[59]
Greta: "You stole my childhood"
Putin, who literally grew up in an 20qm apartment in a poor neighborhood and spent his childhood getting beaten up: "😕"
While she lives in one of the most comfortable countries in the world, with one of the best educations in the world.
@@dxwkx9119 jep, and people don't aknowledge that putin needed to fight hard to get her standard of education. She got it for free and throw away. Everyone can hate or love him, but not many people fought themselves so hard to the top like he did
his father was in the communist party and his grandfather was stalin's personal cook...he wasn't poor.
@@dxwkx9119 Her parents are an actor and a model. They are filthy rich. She's a hypocrite.
I grew up in a slum, where there were very many drugs. I witnessed my neighborhood burn. I think she lives a very cushy life.
Hes right about using children and teenagers as advertisements
The nazis did it
That's funny coming from a guy who used children as a propaganda device for discriminating against gay people.
i feel an argument
She is also an advertisement for the World Economic Forum.
Somehow I don't think her speech was the typical pre-prepared school drama. If it was then she should really consider an acting career.
The real problem is world greed, excess comfort and convenience and the competition to fuel all the greed. People's hearts so hardened except to everything materialistic.
Solve these problems and climate change will solve itself.
Putin: Be more realistic
Greta: How dare you...
Trump: Have fun Greta, go to the movies...
The Left: Stop bullying!
RC RC how dare you
@@PrimalMiltos I'm left leaning and I can't stand the sight of greta :p so shush, stop bullying me lok
Mansplain
@RC RC well said!
His heart is cold,
And his moves are bold,
His speech? I'm sold.
I'm sorry don't like this
Your rhyme is old.
@@birthdayzrock1426 well ur mom is old L
I feel like i have heard this from somewhere. A music video yes i remmber
@@Texonical lol typical 8 yrs old
Love him or hate him, you cannot deny that Putin knows what he is talking about
This comment aged like milk
@@thecoldcallerguy he's still speaking the truth tho
@@thecoldcallerguy LMAOO
@@chuno7354 He was right for attacking. Why should he let the Us place nukes on his border
In this context
I’m not a huge Putin fan, but I would in no way call this being critical. He brings up a very good point actually.
Mysterious Muffin not really. How does that affect the economies that are causing the majority of the problem (Russia, China, the USA)? Those are the worlds strongest economies. They could all very easily enforce a switch to solar power and wind farms, which would solve a significant portion of the problem. But the answer to that is ‘Africa can’t afford to do it, so we aren’t going to either’. Nope, sorry, that’s just not good enough.
Ultima2876 But the thing is those countries won’t STAY the largest economies if they all switch so drastically, therefore making the situations in Africa and Asia worse. Listen, I’m all for environmental protection and everything, and I consider my politics left wing. However I recognise that it’s not as simple as “let’s just all change and it will all be good”. It’s a gradual process, it took thousands of years for us as a species to even learn to use electricity for example.
Kellen As I said before, I’m not a huge fan of Putin. I’d rather have the former Soviet Union back over him. However you must acknowledge he isn’t being critical of Greta here, in fact he’s supportive of her. However I, as a progressive myself, recognise that sometimes we have unrealistic expectations.
Russia is only the powerhouse that it is now because of Stalin’s rapid industrialisation of the nation during the 30’s. However under his regime millions perished, both directly and indirectly due to his policies. Considering how heavy the toll was to achieve that the Russian people would obviously be extremely weary to see that happen again.
Therefore is installing some solar panels really worth that happening again? As I said before, I support environmentalist movements and the like, however it takes time for a country to change that much, and as we’ve seen throughout history when we rush things disaster strikes.
Miss Fortune The same reply goes for your comment as well.
@@Ultima2876 Tell me what are you gonna do about it ?
I'm Swedish and I second this 100%. It's ludicrous how much attention Greta has received.
that‘s the interesting part. Why a little girl can receive so much attention？Because she is used by the adult. Maybe some big companies? they know if the words come out from a child, people will be more willing to believe.
@@潘琪欢 ruclips.net/video/eZq6F5RkSno/видео.html
@Royal Satan and the plight of FaschTube ruclips.net/video/eZq6F5RkSno/видео.html
@Royal Satan and the plight of FaschTube that's right
@Crimson Mist Yep. But people start to waken up. MSM brainwashing alot of ppl worldwide
I agree with Putin, it is easy for people living in developed countries to say everyone should use renewable energy resources or eco friendly products because they are affordable and easily accessible to them but for others in developing and underdeveloped countries it is not easy or possible as they try to find whatever resources to survive and live a good life.
That’s right not every African can travel on a eco-friendly yacht like she has done. Most of what Greta has said is unrealistic and shows her naïveté.
@@Christopher_3191 Correct but it's not just Africa, there are so many countries in Asia and South America as well who cannot afford such amenities but Americans and Europeans like Greta think that they can dictate the world what to do and what not to do just because they feel that they are inferior to others.
Zack Syiem Yes I agree underdeveloped countries should be able to do what they want with their resources. Us in the west have everything. It’s not fair to say what others can make a living with, especially when they have no food or money. She and the people telling her what to say, look elitist and egotistical.
Developing countries causing war in AFRIKA for mineral ! War in Middle EST FOR OIL !
Backward developed nations of abominations !
@@josianenagito4300 First of all, don't blanket all developed nations like that. The US has alot to answer for in regards to their constant involvement in domestic affairs of other countries. And this constant blame on the US that they attacked middle eastern countries for their oil is just stupid. 30-40% of the worlds oil is already produced by the US itself domestically. The wars in the middle east are complicated, extremely complicated and oil might of course play some part in it. But there are tons of other factors aswell, ungrounded beliefs of nuclear weapons, ideological differences, islam extremists, proxy wars and other interests. The world is not black and white. You can't put every issue under one single explanation when there almost always is a ton of different explanations at hand.
I couldn’t agree more with Putin. Common sense and logic.
with an exception that it is not a common sense and logic, since its more than confirmed that people are going to have it much more worse then during covid times due to warming, and what he told that african people want also electric home appliances is a big lie, since Africa is the least contributor to the global warming and greenhouse gasses emissions. Understandable right? So tell me now please, where is that logic.
When Greta opens her mouth, all I hear is BLAH BLAH BLAH! 😏
@@ionphaser7092 what he is saying is that African countries will prioritise the development of the quality of life of their citizens before being concerned about environmental issues (being a developed country usually correlates with concern for the environment). Therefore, it is quite complex as to how to ensure that these countries can develop whilst not exacerbating the effects of climate change over the next 50-100 years. His basic point is that if it were easy to ‘take action’ and solve climate change then it would have already been taken - the issue is that there are so many variables to control for, as well as the fact that the cost of the transition to renewable energy sources will be massive. I think that is a reasonable thing to say, and that tackling climate change should be done in a responsible cost/benefit way so as to protect people’s livelihoods whilst addressing the issue with alacrity
@@NUFCcomps No matter that once africa will want to get more developed, when we have problem now when africa produces 2 percent of global warming contribution and we produce 98 percent of it, so we cant scapegoat 2 percent contributor (2 percents wont save us), no matter how you want to sugarcoat that nonsense, if you thought about it at least for a second.
@@ionphaser7092 I’m not scapegoating them, I don’t know why you’re suggesting that. It’s pertinent to climate change that as these countries develop, they will likely seek out energy sources that are cheaper (fossil fuels). That’s the point, not that African countries are at fault for climate change. If any country is to be blamed, it would be China given that they are the biggest emitter and are making a slower transition in comparison to western countries
Lol how is he criticising? He is stating facts. Typical BBC.
Facts doesn't exists, just interpretations and views.
Sicko Beats While True to a point. There are things such as Solid Facts. A Biological Male for example is a man and nothing else. A Tomato is a fruit, There are 24 hours in a Day.
Criticism doesn't necessarily mean something bad. Criticism can be healthy and constructive. There is nothing wrong with the title because Putin DID critice the fact that why Greta is doing what she is doing. Stating facts is part of criticism.
He is quite clearly criticising but in a constructive way which is much better than just being plain stupid
His facts are bullshit. These developing countries are not the current issue, but he chose to focus on them, why? Because he wanted to make a straw man. China can still change. The US can still change. Wealth of a country is not determined by carbon emissions, as they are simply a byproduct. A system that is punitive towards high emissions can also be supportive of green solutions. Did Putin mention anything like balance? Or focus on those that can make a change? No. No he just spouted a few pathetic examples, and people lap it up. We have the technology to make the difference needed, and it doesn't all hang on africa using solar!
Greta: I should be in school
Putin: You're damn right
She did so much effort to travel around the Earth and make speeches, just to have an excuse to not going school
@@user-and-id i agree with u
@the7thsea jesus christ probably has a better education then you
😠😠 The world leaders is gonna pay very bad for stand against Greta. AND IS GONNA HURT VERY BAD FOR YOU. I DARE YOU!! WE MUST DO GOOD DEEDS FOR THE CLIMATE CHANGE!!!
@@zvukovinb5581 As much as I hate it. It is true.
BBC can't even make putin look bad even if they try lol.
BBC is a fake news channel
XMG3 Do you know anything about how russia under Putin works?
Mate they can trust me anyone can
criticism is not bad, i can critizise anybody, critizism is a way to point mistakes .
@@tiyabharati540 In Russia people beyond the capital and St Petersbourg live and die in poverty, taxes increase, and salaries decrease. for example, teachers earn an average of $ 300. budget places at universities are shrinking. what can this person be respected for? for competent foreign policy? perhaps. but not to the inhabitants of Russia.
Greta: You have ruined my childhood.
3rd world bois: Stop Talking ! I need to study for the entrance exam, it's the only chance I have to escape poverty.
What did she even mean by "ruined my childhood"?
@@sr3821 She is a puppet.
Putin: "The Earth is round";
BBC: "Putin said the earth is flat"
Biased
Bull
Crap
BBC:"Putin criticized the Earth"
What if everything he said was translated false deliberately so that the British who are working will American allies are putting Putin under a bad name, therefore making Putin the one in the wrong.
Janet not at all, translation is correct, and no criticises on it neither
Ok now hear me out for a sec. Just because a person is not sharing generell opinion with someone else, it dont makes all arguments of his opponent false by definition. I dont like Russias Geopolitics, Economics and Putins foreign policy, but I can agree to this: 0:38. Cause his argumentation includs high truth value that I have to accept, untill anyone who has a real solution to this REAL LIFE problem falsifies it. Now sad enough western leftists and far right thugs and trolls cant think that way, and don't present us real solution, but straight up fantasy ideology.
Honestly, Putin is really spitting facts. Couldn’t agree more
Is this Sarcasm?
@@prequall no bruh, what putin said is real
7Evan - Rainbow Six Siege and More. Not at all. Climate change is gonna cause shit but it’s not easy to change with economic circumstances in places
*song of denise starts*
Anoushka S yes Putin himself decided to tip all that oil in himself didnt he.Yk for the vine.
like it or not, he's spitting straight facts
It's not like we're going to hear a response from a panelist that disagrees with Putin.
Climate change is a problem but if you want to help the world going on some rant explaining how it is morally wrong to continue being ignored is not enough. (well maybe in a society that is under extreme conflict under an issue that is ignoring you deliberately without any good reason however here it is lack of resources and funding) You better act within the law to get things sorted.
@@engineergaming5989 well the issue Putin raises is that climate will be extremely difficult to solve in a way that's perceived as "fair" because it's politically impossible for developing countries to switch to clean energy as it would effectively guarantee them 20-30 years of extreme poverty due to it not being affordable for them while switching to "dirty" energy would allow them to develop much faster. Unless we're willing to provide the absolutely massive amount of funding to allow developing countries to industrialize on *clean* energy, they're going to continue burning coal.
harld kardika he usually does
oh he's clean gangsta
I just Love him..He is so intelligent, starightforward, and clear in his thoughts. He is realistic and talk facts instead of hipocrisy as shown by westerners
Wtf
this aged like milk inside of a black car on a hot summer day in death valley.
@@calebwinterbottom8787 No it didn't. Not everyone braindeadly and blindly follows Western propaganda into supporting Ukraine. We have our reasons.
@@moss1w are you a cheerleader of death then?
How come children had to die? Do you like innocent people being killed?
You must like children and mothers being killed. How long have you been a supporter of murdering people?
Dang, Putin not only roasts people for using a teenage girl, he also explains that it's not realistic for countries especially poor ones to just go eco friendly.
Going "eco friendly" is not only expensive, it's super inefficient as well, engineers have already explained that solar panels only perform at 30% and most countries clear out fields just to install them, which makes it not green at all, and then there's wind power, it's so obvious that not all parts of the world has a constant gush of wind strong enough to spin the blades of the windmill everyday, and to top all that they're expensive to create and maintain. So here you go, why aren't you forcing the rich countries instead of the poor ones
@@santiagocortez9554humanity has always managed to do the impossible it just takes us time....we already have a lithium-silicon battery than lasts about 25 times more than its lithium ion counterpart....its expected to be in consumer electronics and cars very soon
@@santiagocortez9554 Yeah, honestly we should just go for nuclear energy.
@@santiagocortez9554 You mean solar panels convert 30% of solar energy that would go unused otherwise to electricity. That does not make them more expensive than fossil fuels, in fact it's cheaper (link in comment above).
@@unevilGenius well you're talking about it in a first world kinda sense, it's so expensive here in 3rd world countries where one panel's worth of money can already feed a family for a month, they're most usually not produced in our countries which means they are imported adding more to their already expensive price, you don't understand how much of a load that would be to us poor people
He isn't criticizing .....just giving another side of view...which is right as well to certain extent
Ram Chandra Patel this is the most accurate comment i have seen so far
Themcplayer 01
Yeah, sure, a side heard a hundred times: we know we should do something, well, yes, but it costs money, we have more urgent priorities, the situation is not as bad as those scientists say, we have still time, they exaggerate to scare us and manipulate this poor kid. And we cannot deny emergent countries’ desire to have a similar level of comfort as us and to make sacrifices ... and I could go on and on forever. This other viewpoint and accurate comment is just the pretext to inaction that Greta Thunberg has been denouncing since months. So much for nuance !
they just want their side of the climate debate. These fools dont realize that there is a whole world's worth of problems out there and there is no ONE magic hammer to fix them all.
the parents of thunberg dont think they are doing it for their own interest,they might indeed be fanatical ecologists.
Exactly, but this is BBC.
"Go and explain to them that they must live in poverty" Putin has no chill, but he is right. Dudes woke.
Exactly. Wise choice of words he has.
@@pineapplecastella2584 yup
“Chill” is something people assume we need only since millennials have insisted upon it. This is real life...
@@loudane9962 you right
@@loudane9962 Ok boomer
Greta Thumberg is the example of how we live in a foolish time frame where a problematic little girl speak to the UN and high podium speaking like a scientist. Shame on her parent that have been using her for years.
He didn’t even criticize her wtf is bbc doing
Bbc is doing what bbc has always done. Propaganda
its called yellow journalism
Just repeating the narrative
Umm... the title doesn't say he criticizes her.... it says he criticizes her speech.
Sorry you can't comprehend english.
Acting like CNN.
I'm not a fan of putin, but he's speaking straight facts.
@jordan belfort His decision killed Litvinenko and the Novichok stuff in England is fishy
Actually I do know a lot about politics, just like you do. Did I ever say that the European leaders and US leaders were angels? no I didn't. In fact, the EU and US leaders are greedy and are causing lots of devastation in The Middle East and Russia is fighting against Daesh and saving Syria from Daesh. But it doesn't change the fact that almost all political leaders have skeletons in their cupboards.
Ethecatlady, also I'll have you know that I would rather live in Russia than live in Europe, I may be moving there soon. I also am Socialist/Communist
@@aspiknf What an argument over a shitty comment.
Arran Vid what a shitty argument
"You adults have ruined my life"
*lives in a first world country with cleaner air than 90% of the world*
First world problems
@Super Aggressive RUclips Commentary wanted?
@@mavericksingh835 not her, but the tool kit which she shared on her Twitter is wanted cuz it was clearly misleading and Anti-Indian. So basically, the creator of that tool kit is in the list.
@@devanshsingh3369 ohh ok I think she is just a child and like every teenager she likes attention. She needs a break 😂
It wouldn't surprise me if one of Soros left Thinktanks are pushing her through her parents activities.
when a real life bond villain is the only one in the room making sense!
He's got a hit list! Watch out Greta! 🙈
BUT he is wrong. Australia,China, US, Russia, western Europe, and all these petrol states in the middle east POLLUTE the most and are middle income or rich countries not poor
@@edwardr8826 BUT you are wrong...are have at least misunderstood what he said. I suggest you listen to what he said again. He said Africa is the poorest, not the one with the most pollution....Also western europe is quite clean...and so is Australia I believe. I don´t know too much of russia...but I never heard of them when it comes to massive pollution....that would be mainly China, second india...and to a degree, the USA (though that would be mainly Co2).
@Jim Spencer That is entirely.....
Accurate sir.
@@Enrico_Palazzo_opera_singer don't say China or india because per capita pollution in these countries are lowest in the world
This isn’t criticism. He’s raising a valid point.
Thats pretty much the definiton of criticism
It's criticism, but its pointed at 'people using the youth for their own interests' not Greta or her speech.
VALIDmir Putin
Okay I’ll leave now
@Obi Dark 14 or 70 if you're going to deliver a speech at the UN, being watched by million be ready to get criticized. And she's 16
@Obi Dark I don't see your ass at the United Nations
Criticizing!!!!?????
This is nothing but STRAIGHT FACTS!!!
ruclips.net/video/eZq6F5RkSno/видео.html
He is criticizing her, I don't know why there are so many comments denying this. You can criticize someone with straight facts
@@per365 Shut Up.
@@haywoodjblome4768 He’s not criticizing Thunberg. It’s the exact opposite, he’s praising her. He is in fact criticizing the idea which is Greta Thunberg and the adults around her which benefit from it
So criticizing can’t be facts?
Like him or not, the guy knows his shit and speaks it very intelligently
Reece Longstaff are you a bot?
Facts
@@Name-jw4sj oof, so many blatant bots here.
@@Name-jw4sj Not particularly a bot. Putin is right here, and we hate him in Sweden and the Rus as a whole.
@@monkegang1023 Just because people disagree does not infact, make them a bot dipshit.
"You have stolen my childhood dreams!"
[Departs in a sailboat]
Putin: points out that it is not easy for developing countries to use renewable energy sources
BBC: Vladimir Putin criticises Greta Thunberg's UN speech
Lol This is so true. Not against her, but she grew in a highly developed country where she lived a quality life. Developing countries need to use non-renewable resources because that's how their economy works and asking them to not do so, is like asking the poor to stay poor.
@@sjegannath6295 i agree
It should be against her. Paper reading, teleprompter little kid who should enjoy being a kid. Her words mean nothing to me at all. Check out the backseat of her free tesla car. Potato chip bags, plastic soda bottles, maybe her choice in foods will let her know that she is nothing to me. Put all your money into saving the earth. Its been thru plate techtonics, bombarded by meteorites, contintental drifts, wildfires, and you think a little plastic bag from the backseat of your electric car is going to save lives? The earth is fine. The earth will just shag us off like a bunch of fleas. Start all over again. Its happened before. The earth is fine, Were the ones who are fucked. Just the earths time to rejuvinate, like flowers in the spring. Or just tell dumbasses to not use pyrotechnics for a baby reveal in a high fire warning area. (I dont care if you have kids or their gender, just dont burn the land.)
@@sjegannath6295 yh but climate change is definitely real
lol😂😂
Why can’t the rest of the world think realistically like this man?
Broken Down GTI because most politicians use Greta’s-like speeches for their own interest.
Because what we have is superficial pretentious human beings thinking they are small little islands floating about the sea
Broken Down GTI because putin don't need votes，so he can say any truths
Because reality is often disappointing.
People feed on unrealistic and unfeasible goals to push a movement. Somehow, those are the ones that get popularized without question.
"She seems to be a very happy girl and is going to have a nice future"
-Donald trump
I protecc
I attacc
But most importantly
I speak straight facc
Stop with this useless meme! It died ages ago
DNA oh no! Anyway
I was surprised
_By this one_
Yeaaa boiiii
Why? She is like 12 but just a bit older... have mercy on her
Short,simple,realistic and 100% right! World leaders should admire the man for having the guts to say what he means.(as opposed to just thinking it)
is this clickbait or does bbc actually put the wrong title
BBC is insanely bias for the far left
They have to report this one, but they are not capable to twist it
it's intentional. Putin = Russia = big bad boss must be taken down.
Zi Wang He is an authoritarian leader, he may be level-headed but his opinion is redundant by default.
He is easily handed a platform, where he gets to express himself to an audience that practically worships him. Whilst a few other people who may be even more concise and rational are stamped out, wasting enormous potential.
You are all idiots.. Look up the definition of the word criticism, its an accurate title.
I never criticized her,!!
I am just telling facts..
@Courage dog Разве Россия устроила Майдан в Украине?
@Courage dog Майдан устроил дядя Сэм
American politics don't believe facts because they believe that they are always right
He’s not criticizing Thunberg. It’s the exact opposite, he’s praising her. He is in fact criticizing the idea which is Greta Thunberg and the adults around her which benefit from it
ruclips.net/video/eZq6F5RkSno/видео.html
@Nicolas d'Avout stfu
🙌
He is not praising her
Exactly! Instead of blaming everyone for ' Ruining' her childhood, she should visit some parts of Asia and Africa and see what childhood looks like in there. They are literally trying just to survive. And here our the great Greta says, everyone ruined her childhood?! How selfish and ignorant!😑
i like how he treated her with seriousness. It is not because she is only a teenager you will say "aw, isn't she cute?". Putin stated a problem to be solved, he treated her with the same respect he has for someone who is in charge of something important.
he also kills all dissenters and has his country in a faux democracy where he is a dictator. but sure the speech sounded good I agree
huh The value of his speech is not tangible to what he does, we’re not supporting Putin. Moreover, we’re just agreeing with his speech. Lumping those two makes no sense on that basis. Anyways if you believe America has a true democracy you’d be disappointed to find out how flawed it is.
Yes, but his speech is very specifically and carefully putting blame elsewhere. He says Africa can't invest in renewable energy because they need to pollute to reach our standard of living, which is fine.
The amount of pollution from Africa is negligible.
Renewable energy is (was) expensive, but if you stimulate supply for it, you can easily artificially lower the price substantially. By the the Africa gets close to the standard of living of Eastern European countries, we'll have invested enough in renewable energy to make the transition very easy for them.
Putin is just trying to find an excuse to not have to invest, because that costs money and doesn't directly benefit him.
deckie how miserable must you be to repeat in other people‘s comments?
@@Apollo5752353 ctrl C ctrl V are very efficient tools 😎
When Putin makes a grammatical error, the dictionary is updated
Then in fact, it's impossible for him to make a grammatical error.
I'm Russian and i can say that his speach is grammatically perfect. I wish to have the same level :)
@@Blamzy there is a delay between the grammatical error and the dictionary updating. so live it would be a grammatical error but it no longer becomes a grammatical error once its updated
@@torb1trick415 true true
Lame
If she wants to be treated like an adult, let her be criticized like one
Well, both raise good points.
Greta has hit the nail in the head about several topics.
Our world is a closed system, which means that while power can be obtained in a renewable manner, it is expensive, and it is impossible to do so with matter [Eventually the materials are too far gone for recicling] and anyone who says otherwise needs to think again.
And global warming IS a critical issue that demands immediate attention.
BUT Putin is also right in other things.
Green energy, while renewable, is also expensive, and not all polymers derived from oil can be easily replaced.
And developing nations have limited resources, and will not hesitate to use polluting tech to increase standarts of living faster.
That said, resources need to be managed in a more inteligent manner, and remaining resources should be used to aid the transition, not to mantain an unsustainable status quo.
Greta might not have all the answers, but she made the right questions. Which is already better than most.
@@YourLocalMairaaboo Greta is not speaking anything . Those arent her words. Do you think somebody her age has enough life experience and a clue about how this world really works ? She is just a puppet and enjoying the attention , beeing treated like the hero that she isnt.
@@its4481 not gonna comment on the puppet thing [I don't want a flame war, as the constant notifications are annoying.] Still, it is true that the debate isn't black and white, and an actual issue is present.
ruclips.net/video/eZq6F5RkSno/видео.html
@@its4481 ruclips.net/video/eZq6F5RkSno/видео.html
Exactly my thoughts when I heard about Greta. Transitioning to renewable energy overnight is impossible, and berating nations for not being able to do so is both unfair and unrealistic. It's far more complicated than it seems, and to do it in such a rapid pace would mean you have to ask the populace to endure hardship for several years, because you would have to phase out and replace a lot of the existing infrastructure to accommodate the rapid change, hence why the solution to climate change is slow, otherwise it would be too unbearable.
Greta is actually quite the hypocrite. The only reason she can say those things is because she lives a comfortable life. Stole her childhood? Face people who are actually from Africa and Asia, see if you can keep a straight face saying that to them face to face without facing immedaite backlash from the crowd of Africans and Asians fighting everyday just ro survive and demand that they do something about climate change whem they can barely feed themselves.
This is gold. Thanks for your thoughts
She's not talking about poor Asian and African countries tho.
She's talking about rich industrialized countries that are still mining coal and using oil for profit.
shame to you, bbc. he said "developes fast", not "changes fast". you don t care?
Developing» usually means something gets better. «Change» can be either. That kinda makes a difference ;)
@silverbud obviously, the logics is not your best trait so shouldn't you keep this fact in secret rather than show it to people?
oh they care. they care enough to spin it.
@@simenkunicekream Yeah. "Development" is a progress not just simply an altering process where "change" can be both and interpreted in distinct ways. Putin refers to economic reality and what people in third world actually want.
Im impressed as he is a president speaking without the need of a script unlike many others and actually make sense!
Well he does makes sense but Not THINKING of solution is not a valid argument or decision either....the thing remains that if we think about these complex issues we can get a middle ground somewhere but if we throw them for no reason other than we don't think it's possible then I don't know why people are called intellectual.
@@shyamsingla716 he didn't say to throw these ideas out for no reason. He basically said it's more complicated than it seems, expensive, and unrealistic. And you're an intellectual?
He is has stolen billions in corruption as his populace cant afford shoes. Let him speak well, and hide the fact he is one of the most evil people on the planet. He alone has in his pockets more money than the u.s.a solar energy investment(which is greater than any other energy) in the year 2019. Just him. He talks like poor people pay for energy...poor people cant afford light bulbs. Like much of his country cant.
@@danesesse Brainwashed Trump supporter alert. You can tell by the hilarious use of parenthesis xd. YOU WISH American politicans could be so eloquent and straight-forward. Eat up the lies and keep paying them to show your 'support' lol
@@vick7848 i am not american or a trump supporter. Is putin the opposite of trump? You assumption confuse me. I was critizing putin... how does that make me a trump supporter.
Even if you though I was defending the american president, that is Biden not trump.
Are you lost?
"You have ruined my dreams, and my childhood with your empty words"
*lives in one of the most highly-ranked countries in terms of quality of life*
i guess this is where the importance of travel comes in
I don't like Greta either and I share Putin's words in this video, but she doesn't mean only herself with these words.
Uhh, I think it's more like don't ruin my generation's future, but yea sure keep telling yourself that
@@derhoffnungsvolle5122 what did she not get in her life?
@@m4tta i choked out when reading this comment
This guy speaks less but when he speaks , he speaks to the point .
really? I saw him recently holding a monologue for more than two hours, ranting on and on and on and on about how the West was ruining it all for his ambitions...
This sounds more like a father pointing out the mistakes of a daughter and teaching her more than anything else
Which undoubtedly Greta'a father failed to do.
@@jayeshjadhav5575 And yours because Greta is right. Sorry if your father taught you feelings trump facts but they don't. Sorry he told you blind worship of a criminal dictator and BS is a good thing.
He seems like he has no ill will, and just wants to give her pointers, I agree
@@jamespyke6764 oof political expert in the building
@@zaidlacksalastname4905 Oof shill and ignorance in the building.
So he's simply being reasonable which is a trait lost to American media.
he is being manipulative like he always has been
@@Mrdegaulle1 actually he was ask a question about her ideas and what he said was true, especially about Africa. Oh, and the world is complicated.
You see that as manipulative I see it as reasonable honesty.
@dswarriors People in the developing world are not stupid.
They see Ms. Thunberg on a yacht sailing across the Atlantic. Their children don't have shoes to wear.
They see her giving speeches at the UN. They would do anything to have their kids go to school.
They see her acting like a petulant child, glowering and grimacing. They teach their children how to behave with respect in public.
They see her acting like an entitled brat. They teach their children to give in order to get.
Jamal Labarge first of all, greta doesnt travel on a yacht, so im not even gonna bother readin the rest of ur ignorant comment.
@@baekin-8258
The New Yorker magazine dated August 30 2019, describes Ms. Thuneberg's transatlantic trip. The boat, the Malizia 2, left Portsmouth on August 14 2019. She arrived in New York City before Aug 23 2019. On the boat.
You can find this article online, ready for your viewing pleasure, and hopefully education. Since you like to impugn people for reporting facts I hope that you take a moment from your outbursts to actually learn something.
PUTIN: She is a girl
MEDIA: Putin slams Greta.
Why aren't the privileged climate activists living and protesting in China and India? which create most of the world's pollution.
@@PeopleHealthTru hello there i think u forgot to include america .
@@atlasknox7514 sorry but USA has strict pollution controls and is cleaner than Europe. Paris Accord just wants USA to pay for everyone else's pollution control.
@@atlasknox7514
ruclips.net/video/wRk1p8Lzwvo/видео.html
Shapiro mentioned that the leading reductor in emissions is the united states.
People Health Truth before I’ve been in US I thought it was polluted af. I’m from Eastern Europe. Except some bigger cities i was way wrong.
Japan is the cleanest country I ever been though.
"My brother always told me that nothing said before the word 'but' really counts." 😀
Wait this is from got right
Ahh i think you took that from GOT .lol
Well I mean he put in quotation marks so he didn’t technically pass it off as his own?
I didn’t expect to find Tyrion here but I’m glad I did.
"Our abusive mom is dead, but she left us a lot of money." Proved your pseudo wise quote wrong, didn't I?
It's unethical and unprofessional to cut or censor the speech, put the whole damn speech......!!
@Stonehaven I love how everyone criticises the BBC for being "too left" or "too right". I can sit here and be smug about how stupid all these arguments are because everyone just sees them as the enemy through their jaded eyes.
Stonehaven accept the BBC is run by the conservative government. Of course they’re leftist when portraying Corbyn in pictures it photoshopped itself that he was Russian. The BBC is the running governments propaganda machine.
Arash surosh The complete answer:
ruclips.net/video/i2U4e9Yjgbo/видео.html
I was just settling into what Putin had to say, which I am sure is more worthwhile hearing than any of the b.s dripping from the mouths of leftard activists.
Anyway he was just making a bull-shit argument. It's like someone trying to get off the hook by talking about homeless people, when apprehended for massive tax-fraud: "Why don't you go to the homeless and explain why they need to pay taxes?"
So just to be clear: Putin isn’t criticizing Greta or her cause, but rather the mechanism behind the cause? Title should’ve been “Putin questions how realistic the plan is”
RUclips vids often exaggerate what's really happening for the mad views, that's media for ya
"Putin questions his profits under the plan"
White vs white!🙈🔥
Samantha Ecotothermia SAY THAT...!!! EXACTLY.. COULDNT AGREE MORE
Greta: You stole my childhood!
African young soldier entered the chat searching for water...
Ffs
yes
wtfffff 😂😂😂😂😀😭😭😭😭😭 wait why am laughing 😂😂😀😀😀😭😭😭😭😭😭😭
African soldier : What am i doing in this chat ? There's no water here ?
Lobomyr put me here !... something confusing about Greta...? Please let me go !
Greta enters the chat:
- You're all idiots !
He is not criticizing, he is spitting out facts that people doesn't not want to realize.
A problem they've turn their head from.
I never realised Putin is such a wise man
pretty much common sense, you have to be mentality deficient not to understand this. and the sad thing, most people who agree with greta are, a child ruling in the world of adults, that's how low the western society has stooped, it's pathetic and laughable.
He just has the balls to say it.
He is politically incorrect and has balls of steel
@@squirrel4752 whats climate change😂 i thought the climate always changed look at the ice age.
He runs a Nation State, a not unimportant one too to put it lightly
I love his intelligence...he argues with facts and common sense not emotions .
Well, he’s ex-KGB
KGB agents are trained not to rely on emotions. Emotions stand in the way of killing people
He's distracting by talking about developing countries though the main contributors to emissions are wealthy countries.
@@tvens8567 the uk bombed one million people in Iraq and the USA supply weapons to Israel which are used to as a genocide so really every country is just as curupt as the next
@@anastasiapopov7250 LOL. Like you need to kill someone with your own hands to be responsible for it? Putins responsible for death of thousands of people
@@tvens8567 How many people did USA kill since George Bush became president to now? There is no such different. You just hate him because media paints that way. They don't give a fuck about us. That's a fact.
FUN FACT : When putin installs windows, microsoft accepts his terms and conditions
When putin goes on a website.
Google accepts his cookies
You made my day... 😊
LMFAO! Underrated!
It's not fun fact, it OUR FUN FACT
@Papa Stalin CRAVING ATTENTION i GUESS
at least there's 1 world leader who lives in reality
Like him or not, he doesn't sound as moronic as our current political leaders.
@@nothingtowatch3708 to clarify, American political leaders.
@@Cw81Deut6n4 Trump is smarter than him, which is why the USA economy is booming and everyone elses is slagging.
right mr. Putin speak truth, we develop country want become like eropa
@@bud389 I supported Trump with my vote. I'm not hating on him. The left though.. goodness. But even Trump says too much. Putin just sounds like a real leader when he speaks. I'm sure we don't hear everything about him that he does or that has happened.
Putin and moronic shouldn't even be used in the same sentence lol
BBC: "Putin is evil and here's why!"
Audience that read what he said: "... nothing wrong with what he said. He was right and gave a sober, balanced take."
BBC: Pikachu
But they didn’t say he was evil ?
@@Ali_Nar They didn't use the word evil. It doesn't mean the title does not heavily imply that he's mean.
And BBC regularly insists that he's the most evil man on the planet.
@@NikolaAvramov If you view this title as negative then you are being rather too sensitive. No? Since when was "X criticizes Y" a negative thing? It's a statement.
Just because other videos might (even though I have no idea which videos you are referring to here..) call him bad, doesn't mean that this video is as well.
And to the other guy: It's typical on both sides of the media spectrum to give off bias. Since when was Russian news not biased towards the president in an abnormal way compared to other more democratic countries?
@@user-pi8pd9wc5y Yeah. Saying that slander is slander is being too sensitive.
Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight.
Let's play dumb.
I can't believe I'm saying this but, I'm with Putin.
I know.... feels like someone walked over my grave. 😜
Me too! Putin vs Greta!
me too
@@sheeesh844 and be with orwellian regime too.
I'm on your side because reality isn't like expectation.
Only leader in the entire world
Who talks common sense
And is realistic and tells it as it really is
Well said Vladimir
He criticised people who used this kid not her. You guys are taking a 15 year old kid too serious.
That's the point. Then instead of debating ideas they can claim people are attacking a minor .
You say "you guys", most of them aren't genuine people. They're shills, trolls and activists. The whole reason they've turned Greta into the face of climate change activism is because you can't criticize their words when they say it through the mouth of a child - or else they'll call you "hateful", "bully", etc. It's faux outrage.
And people are taking 15 years old too seriously
Well older people should listen more to her, because she can be a teenager and everything, but it's doing what everyone refuse to do,
That is doing a lot of mess to make the younger generation angry, make the governments notice something, then it's governments responsibilities to help the developing countries with clean energy and use clean energy themselves, and remember most of the co2 emissions comes form the us China and Russia, all developed and industrial countries.
Oxaan Roudbaraki actually no one is manipulating Greta.
"Anyone who uses children and teenagers in their own interest,it deserves only to be condemned." Wise words that fell on deaf ears at the BBS
He didn’t even say “condemned”. He said “criticized”
To be fair, having world that is hasn't been wrecked by global warming seems to be the interest of the majority of today's younger generation. I don't want to have in a world with oceans covered in plastic and all the rain forests cut down. What about you Mike? Do you have any kids that you are close to?
@Paradoxical Nightmare Then what is your republican Trump doing
@@NomadicWanderer11 thing is, everyone wants a clean environment and no climate change. What Putin says is that none of this youth would want to live in poverty in order to achieve this.
Just being emotional and crying on the camera doesn't solve all the problems... Madam you have zero percent idea about the reality in third world countries... You live in Sweden !!
The huge problems aren’t the poor third world countries, it’s China a second world country and China can change if politicians push them into changing their industry, but they’re to greedy to do that. That’s basically what Thunbergs most famous speech was about.
We can scoff all we want but it wasn't a year since her first UN address that the whole world went into lockdown. When little people cry it brings about change.
@@TosoToco So true. The entire west now afraid to stand up to China.
Remember that hole in the ozone that was such a big deal in the 80s and 90s? Well China has picked up the slack where we left off. It's back only in a different place and nobody is talking about it even though the British Antarctic survey is well aware.
@@chrisdeep8417 imagine outsourcing almost all production on the planet to one country and then blaming it for producing (more production = more waste) too much. China is not guilty. Try to produce youf shit by yourself instead of concentrating it in industrial center of the planet
Really go live thier b4 u spew that crap out her mouth HOW DARE HER!!!
Putin "schools" Greta, not criticizes! He is absolutely right!
I'm still confused if I should leave a like for the speech or a dislike for the title
In a same dilemma 🤔🤔🤔
They are making him seem like a negative guy when in fact he makes perfect sense
Dislike
If there are many likes, the people will know that putin is right i suppose so i suggest liking. Plus, the title didnt said something wrong about putin's speech, is is 50-50. It just said "criticising" and it's not a bad thing.
Yeah I am confused too, as one of those gen-z's, Greta's view is inspiring but looking at the bigger picture its impractical unless some revolutionary technology comes up, but if we don't even try the technology we are talking about won't come.
He didn’t really criticise Greta tbf he just was being realistic
Hi frank
@@theresarayner5726 Hi Theresa.
@@tanishkatiyar3448 Hi Tanish
@@theresarayner5726 How are you doing?
@@tanishkatiyar3448 I'm doing alright, how are you?
His response was so respectful and logical though 🤭
his responve was manipulative and pretty stupid at the same time. thtas the response anyone not willing to give up his seat would say. its like saying greta you understand that this old lady want your seat when she is actually saying that would should all get off the bus
:: I don't think that 😅 It would've been manipulative if he said everything that other "politicians" said and took Gretas side🤷🏽♀️ He's the only one who explained why it was not right to use 16 year old as a weapon to your personal political success. I personally don't really like some interviews that's he's given but this is definitely not one of them. 🤭
Apollox44 Pollo Here we go again degrading ones with different opinions 😕 Calling someone foolish just because you don't agree with them is "childish" (as you say 😏). Please if you have real argument we can have mature conversation but if you don't, kindly scroll down and stop spreading negativity 😊I never disrespected you 'cause of your opinion and I expect the same 🙏🏼
Apollox44 Pollo We're on the same page on that 👌 I definitely think this whole "Green campaign" is nothing but making someone's pocket full 😬 I said I agree with him ONLY about" Greta issue" 🤷🏽♀️
Apollox44 Pollo 🙈 Thank you 🙏🏼
"Vladimir Putin saying straight facts" that should be the title!
People are often addicted to DRAMA and being REALISTIC is often forgotten.
Putin is drama correctly said bro....this girl is realistic!!!
What is and isn't realistic is often subjective. There is no physical law that prevents humans from acting in a way that reduces the damaging effects of human activity on the Earth's environment and, therefore, reduces human suffering in the future. But many deniers act as if there is.
Science is reality. Politics is drama. wake up!
and what has greta done to benefit climate change? i don’t see anything...
I totally agree. Someone shamed me for the fact that I "still use airplanes" to go home once a year to visit my family who lives on the other side of the ocean. They said that I should "put the interests of the planet" over my family and just don't go to visit them anymore - period. I'm sorry but I can't put "the interests of the planet" over my family. I should take a ship - okay, well I would do that if that is the only alternative (I don't want to be considered a "bad person"), but i wish that ships would be a) cheaper and b) go on a regular basis.
Putin: we should encourage teens and try to support renewable energys even if everythings a bit more complicated
bbc: russian man bad, triggerwarning!
Looks like BBC are feeling salty
ruclips.net/video/SlgIa7PLmHg/видео.html
I dont get why you guys think BBC is partisan here? He did critique her, that's not a lie. His critique is dumb as hell as well so i don't get your hard on for the guy.
@@toddharig8142 luckily you are just kidding
@@eldakka2163 Nope. Please explain to me how i am wrong.
I am from India, and after some issues. I understood why Putin said such things in the first place. He saw right thru her.
@@ElenaKomleva First get your facts straight, if we r soo much backward then why to invest in our countries, take advantages of our resources.
And if we r soo backward donot use our vaccines.
Soo Ungrateful you people are
Bite the very hand that feeds you
@@ElenaKomleva clap can be done by 2 hands only. Your country give us scholarships, your companies work in India, your country's leader Reagan incorporated ISIS, Al-Qaeda. What do you think what lead to such dictator. Your country's failures and world domination plans. If we r not ruled by Britishers and they wouldn't have taken 45$ trillion from us. Who would be working for whom. You depend on us for vaccines.
You people destroyed whole middle East and North Africa for your benefit. And today u people claim to be humanitarian one.
Get your eyes open.
We r runned by these dictators is because of western world only. Because without them we will be same as middle East countries.
@@ElenaKomleva You have no clue do ya?
Someone actually wrote a whole paragraph. Show some courtesy.
@@ElenaKomleva well damn some ignorant fool here
My respect for him has grown several folds
"someone needs to tell Greta that the modern world is complicated"
finally someone said it
The guy has corruptly stole 200 bullion from russian mostly with oil sales. He alone has stolen more than the u.s.a invested in solar in 2019(thats more than fossil fuels by the way).
The world isnt that complicated. He who profits from oil, makes the arguement people who cant afford light bulbs should want something that harms their lives.
He is one of the most corrupt evil people on the planet. Dont be naive and listen to him. 35% of his country cant afford a second pair of shoes as he is one of the richest people ever.
@@danesesse stop living in jealousy of someone that has it way better than you will ever have. Focus on what you can control. Quit worrying about other people.
@@danesesse go and watch fake news
@@tbarr_8 bro Putin is quite literally one of the worst people on earth lmfao
@@yungpunk3522 even if Putin did it, what can you do? None. So it is better to focus on things that you can actually do, let the big shots fight themselves, we don't have the power to solve things that are beyond us, we basically live in a different world than them.
The last part where he says “We need to be realistic”
Says enough
It was a wrong translation
@@hardwares Yes and there is a difference. "We need to be realistic" sounds like he's opposed to enviromental idealism. But he literally said we can't but support those ideas and we need to align our expectations within the area of possibilities
@@jamesfranco5939 Oh ok, that sentence made him look like a villain who betrays the MC with a single sentence. "We need to be realistic" and then proceeds to do villainous thing. Your explanation makes more sense.
Me: reading eng subtitles, while I'm native in russian. (-_-)
Евала
Mee too . As a black person fluent in russian.
@Sophie 3,000 for the most part correct. They should have used develops instead of changes
Me: reading Eng subtitles because what did he say!?!
Same
Every time I watch Putin speak I realise he is the only true leader of the world. His answers are so concise and thought out that you cannot help but agree with him!
What you wanted to say is correct, what you said is not.
Putin: *looks at map in his office*
BBC: “Russia hits the button! Putin prepares for missile attack! Europe on the brink of disaster!”
BBC = British Bullshit corporation
@@aureliaandris8240 BBC= Big b
Never mind
@@comradecat1922 I don't like where you are going
@@xeraphyx7903 i like where this is going🙂
@@comradecat1922 BBC = Big butthurt channel
Strange times when Putin is a rare voice of maturity and reason.
@gillysuit2 www.novayagazeta.ru/news/2019/09/04/154966-pripodnyavshemu-zabralo-na-shleme-rosgvardeytsa-kirillu-zhukovu-dali-let-kolonii
Proofs about story with rosgvardian guy, u can auto translate it if u want
Hardly strange. Putin has been reasonable since he became president.
@@dicecorporation what do you mean?
@Mainak Basu Nazis have always hated russians. It's in their blood
@Mainak Basu that only exists in the mind of a pure Nazi like the average ukrop ;D
He's not criticising her, just giving straight up good advice.
There is nothing wrong with constructive criticism. You just have to have into account that you must discuss it in a manner as objective as possible, and not focus on who is exposing the viewpoint, but on the arguments themselves.
@@YourLocalMairaaboo Yes, I completely agree.
Centuries ago western countries started their industrialization without ecology concerns. Today, based on that, and colonialism (read: plundering Africa&Asia), they are rich and would like to stay such by, among other things, preventing poor nations to develop. Those poor nations must try to industrialize, but can not affort to mind Greta's eco histery. When as rich as SWE and USA, talk to them again. They shall have an open heart, I have no doubts.
His point on developing countries is absolutely spot on. Glaring hypocrisy and people don't mention it enough.
Nope. Climate action actually explicitly states this idea of carbon-offset to allow poorer countries to evolve. We, as far richer countries, have a duty to reduce our carbon enough (aka carbon negative) that developing countries can invest and develop without fear of adding to climate change. This is, of course, with the caviat of getting those countries to switch as quickly as possible to sustainable and green economics, but it's well understood by everyone that we, who have the technology, need to support those who don't. Pretending like the world's top scientists haven't already thought of this is pure propaganda at this point
He's worth 100 billion. Maybe he can lessen the poverty by helping them out. Didn't hear that in his chat.
Funmi Sotuminu Lol he also isn’t mentioning that he sells oil & natural gas for a living **rolls eyes**
@@AndrewHaym anything to back that up. A link to a guardian article won't do...
Completly wrong. Solar is affordable and working well in poor villages. Watch a documentary called 2040.
I wish BBC leaves an unbiased, unjudgmental titles to their published videos.
I NEVER trust edited videos. Never BBC.
Piddle Hide what’s so bias about the title. Do you even know the definition of criticise. It’s “indicating faults in a disproving way”. The fault he indicated was that it’s not a problem and she should be thankful and he disproved her by saying people in Asia and Africa wish to live her privilege life. Yes we know the BBC is bias but if you want to prove it, your statement doesn’t prove it in the slightest and even makes you look bias.
It could be worse, never watch Fox/fucks/Faux🦊 news. Literally a trumptard propaganda “news” channel.
@@anderswl916x2 ikr? I also cannot think for myself and like to fit into the mold. Trumptards, amirite? xddddddd
I speak russian. Nothing in translation was changed. And putin did infact ctiticise her
I think they do but it's like them picking fun of trump for bloody drawing a path for a hurricane with a sharpie can u rlly blame them it's totally reasonable 🤣😂 he just whipped out a pen and... Oh god I can't.. 😂😂😂
The BBC criticising Putin because he asked everyone to keep an open mind.
Right 👍
It's not really criticising Putin. With the exception perhaps of putting the word criticising in the title with its connotations. But people forget that criticising is as mild as pointing out an error (and is therefore good and necessary)
Thats the leftist mindset for you.
his heart is COLD
his moves are BOLD
and he never gets OLD