Andrew now gets to live in taxpayer funded luxury without needing to lift a finger nor worrying about the dilemma of eating or heating that so many of us have to face.
Abolish the monarchy, enough is enough. It's time a family that enjoys limitless privilege and the misery of the poor comes to an end. I want to see them decide whether they eat or heat.
@@LambsyLamb and also subjecting someone to be in constant cameras is tax payer funded abuse. They should live normally when they're born, cause they can't express political opinions, and are constantly scrutinised by press. Which sucks, plus it's a massive waste of money
He's not very bright but saying that given all their inbreeding I would expect them to be more Epstein than Einstein. If he wanted to molest children, being a naval man he should've done it out at sea where no country has jurisdiction. I thought he knew that?
The grand old Duke of York’s accuser Had 10,000 allegations She took them all to the top of the hill … and she took them down again. Pretty hypocritical she didn’t have the trial. I thought he couldn’t buy his way out of this?!?
@@pippipster6767 Did she ever say that? I think you are making it up. I did t quick google and couldn't see her saying anything like that, although I may be wrong, and you can easily prove me so. To most people he just admitted his guilt to the entire world, maybe admitted it as many 12 million times.
Might have if he has left a tiny bit of decency in him...if the tax payers are happy to give away for hypocrites like him, then no worries... yea, we have the heritage of Victorian hypocrisy too...😂namely, proud progressive people still admiring the the age old, literally bloody empire in this 21st century democratic world!! what a proud moment to cherish🤣
I'm Irish. That's how long you leave it, I've seen fellas wait half an hour. You have let it settle, though that's a poor looking pint with a thin head on it.
It's not just Andrew, all the royals are dodgy. Keep questionable company and abuse their expenses. Anne has used helicopters to attend horse events, hardly appropriate. Charles has been implicated in giving honours to people through one of his charities. It's all at murky, deliberately so. Do we really want these people as head of state? Do we need a head of state, especially this family, any of them?
@@SuperNeilAdams Not that old chestnut! Plenty of tourist at Versailles, France, long after their monarchy was over. Without the royals in residence tourists would be able to visit throughout the palaces and castles they now occupy.
@@SuperNeilAdams The Netherlands have Royal families but hardly anyone touts tourism as a reason to keep them. Many tourists prefer to go to already established hot spots to enjoy the Netherlands such as rotterdam, Amsterdam, Copenhagen and so on
@Graham Hugh Wilson I'm not sure that everyone understands how corrupt everything is, I'm not sure a lot of UK citizens are bright enough to understand. They read the Daily Mail and Express and believe all the racist, nationalist bullshit they print every day, without a thought to who owns the newspaper and what their agenda is, the print and broadcast media have enabled these treacherous bastards to rob the public blind, we need true revolt in the UK and we need it whilst there is still something worth fighting for...
Did what? He knows that everyone knows he shagged her so what are you talking about? He paid her off because he didn't want to be forced to discuss it in court. Isn't that completely obvious?
Can you imagine how he would have performed under cross examination? The Maitlis interview gave us just a taste of his arrogance, self entitlement and total lack of empathy.Virginia Guiffre had lined up one of the best lawyers in the US so if it had gone to court it would have been a total shitshow for Andrew.Personally,I would have loved to see him squirm.
Well, apart from Prince Charles' dodgy mates: Laurens van der Post, who allegedly encouraged Charles to talk to plants and got a 14 year old girl pregnant. Bishop Ball, who persuaded young men to engage in naked praying. Sir Jimmy Savile who was allegedly a marriage counsellor to Charles and Di... Then there was Prince Philip's brother in laws in the SS... And the Duke of Windsor and his weakness for the Third Reich... And Prince Andrew's true father, most likely Lord Porchester.... But apart from that, the Royals are totally above reproach!
We Scots have long enough suffered ,Anglo Saxon Hunnish depredations; not to mention induced famines and massacres seemingly in perpetuity! BUT WHAT THE FUCK!!!!! WHA' S FUCKED MA TEDDY Bears!
Paying someone off is a classic admittance of weakness and guilt. If you are innocent and believe it 100% you would not open your (wait public wallet) to pay someone off…corruption again.
Of course you would not. Innocent people do not settle, they demand their day in court because they are innocent and when you are innocent there is no evidence against you.
In a healthy society news of 2 Princes being investigated for breaking child exploitation and charity corruption laws would result in a rejection of the whole institution
A disgrace combine this with the billions the government are emptying out in front of our very eyes…the whole lot royals and politicians need removing from power/control - people have had enough
@@DarrenJCalvert well, for the government, we have elections, so I have no problem with them. But the royal family... As long as they procreate, they stay...
@@DarrenJCalvert I'm serious about a revolution, the establishment is taking us all for fools, they are a tiny minority whilst we are tens of millions. We could have them all locked up by lunchtime and use their assets to build a beautiful poverty-free, homeless-free, debt-free country for all future generations to enjoy...
@@mayrav1155 Agreed, you forgot lacking empathy and inbred too! 😉 Charles also wanted to be Camilla's tampon according to one of his private conversations! Ewwwww
@@audreybarnes6527 Yes, okay. But why should we be surprised? After all they are merely human beings who have been bizarrely elevated by other human beings for no reason.
Perfectly crafted, embarrassed to admit I didn't know about the dubious guest to his daughter's wedding. Thanks for the education. Please keep them coming.
Seeing the damage that has been inflicted by Andrew on himself and his family, and the fact he’s pretty much lost everything. You’d kind of expect him to be going in to court, head held high screaming from the roof tops that he is innocent and will prove it. I never expected an innocent man to be paying for his accusers silence.
@@jasonbyrne8487 dont forget this is the american legal system. Tried and true method of getting a result is involve expensive lawyers. Either the defendant or the accuser cant afford it OR its just cheaper to settle than go through years of lawyers pay checks. No body gets charged with anything....including the accuser even if the allegations are false.
@@heneo I don’t think money is the issue somehow and I suspect Andrew has far more reserves than that of his accuser. The threshold for any civil action is far lesser than that of a criminal offence. Irrespective, if I hadn’t done anything wrong then I’d personally rather die living on my feet defending my name than live on my knees known globally as the Prince who gagged his accuser and was best mates with a convicted sex offender.
He's not lost anything of particular value. He's still rich. Mummy (ie us the tax payer) still pay for everything. He still has access to corrupt politicians and I strongly suspect there will be a long campaign to 'rehabilitate' his image. I have spoken to sailors who served with him, let's just say his preference for 'young meat' was known about back in the 80's.
This prince Andrew situation is just diabolical, I totally agree with you mate, the right place for him is prison, you're absolutely right, but instead now we tax payers have to finance his useless lifestyle, it's just not on, is it ? £12M to settle a situation which should've been settled ages ago, but instead mummy have to sort for him, and paid by us normal stupid citizens, how fair is that ehi, I wonder !? Not at all it's the answer, not in the slightest !! Just makes me so angry, it's unbelievable 😤
Out of curiosity : where is the money coming from ? I understand the Queen will help him pay the bill, but where does she get that money ? Also, the US justice system is pretty shocking. Being rich allows you to buy your way out of prison.
The queen gets the money from human trafficing, sex trafficing, illegal arms sales, drug running, and rigging everything stocks insider trading off shore accounts paridice pappers BCCI, BIG BANKS are involved
@@MHMHMH97 I always thought taxpayers money didn't go to the royal family, except for their official duties. Well, I guess some of the 1,5% increase on NI might be reallocated to this family in need ..
@@Chris-sx6kc I thought the same, but it does, remember not so long ago they're using 350 million taxpayers money to renovate Buckingham palace, in the name of boosting tourism.
@@MHMHMH97 Ouch, I remember reading something about that, didnt remember the amount !! I hope the ticket cost (30£/55£) goes back to the taxpayers and not them !!
How can someone born into wealth and privilege from a family so many want to model themselves on, be so unquestionably corrupt and amoral. Why the British public continue to tolerate paying for this disfunctional family to live this scandiously wealthy lifestyle, (whilst so many contributing to their vulgar spending) cannot even feed their own family adequately!
Ms. Lum Wai. Please don’t generalise. It’s totally unfair. What would happen if I generalised that all people of African or Asian origin were ALL like you describe the Royal Family ? It wouldn’t surprise me if I was called a racist and justifiably so.
It says all you need to know about the disgusting self important self serving mind set of the royal family (not the Queen). Prince Charles is not far being his sleazy brother in this and it will be a disgrace and embarrassment to the U.K. if Charlie boy and Camilla end up as our king and queen - get rid of all of them .
I wish you'd open your eyes. The Queen is just as bad as her rotten family if not worse. She ordered a new state coach on the same day the bedroom tax was introduced thereby making the sickest, most vulnerable people in this country pay for a mode of transport only used on state occasions, Maybe once a year. At the start of the pandemic when Boris was throwing money around furloughing people, the Queen sacked people working at the various palaces "because nobody was visiting". The richest woman in the country could easily afford to furlough a few workers who were probably being paid minimum wage anyway decided she'd rather just dump them because it was inconvenient to show some humanity to fellow humans. The same Queen who for decades has told people they should be concerned about others. Disgusting creatures
Did no one ever question the staff at Pizza Express? It's not everyday a member of the royal family brings his kids in, is it. I think you'd remember, I think I would. I remember the one occasion I got close to the Queen, whilst flattening out the turf (a half time tradition) at a polo event in Windsor Great Park (I was there working, for a living, unlike any of them). You remember stiff like that.
Why hasn’t his slyness bodyguards logbooks been looked at + plus if he was in the pizza place the workers surely would of asked for a photo or made the locals news🙈
And these are just the things we know about. The corruption in this world is insane yet most of it goes on without notice since the rich just pay to keep it quiet
It's a disgrace ! You're quite right,so, he's denied everything is complete blameless,guilty of no 'wrongdoing' ( I hate that word),so why is he shellin out supposedly £12 mill to a woman he's never met ? Very strange,oh,and the dosh ? The British taxpayer will take care of that.A real shame that girl didn't take him to court.Hes pretty much got away with it then.Hes lost a few titles an bling,so what,he'll want for nothing in the future,a comfy life assured.Im not happy.
After his interview that showed he was as guilty as could be there isn't a defence lawyer who would put Andrew on the stand anywhere in the world, Andrew would crap himself
Bernadette Crawford Yes they really need to be consigned to history. It's time for England to grow up and break up the firm, as the monarchy is an outdated concept
There was a vicious rumour going around just Christmas past that there was a special Prince Andrew advent calendar made. But they were all said to be faulty, as only the flaps from 12 to 17 were able to be opened.
As soon as I saw his face in that interview , I thought he looks so guilty , everyone knew he would get away with this , if a poor person did this it would he would be put in prison because he can't pay off the accuser , one rule for the rich and another for the peasants .
He is not guilty. If you would do a bit of research you would find everything Guiffre accused Prince Andrew of is a lie. Prince Andrew is not Epstein. Even if her accusation that he had sex with her at the 3 locations were true, she was of legal age at all 3 and not a " baby " or a " child " as she so piteously declared. Then the fact that she claims Epstein offered her $15,000 to have sex with Prince Andrew, if it were true, then she knew beforehand what she was going to do, so it could not have been sexual assault. Guiffre first got involved with Epstein when she was asked to give a total stranger, a rich man a massage. At 16, after having lived with a 69 yr old who was convicted of sex trafficking before she even met Epstein, Guiffre was not an innocent " baby " and knew quite well what a massage meant. Then, when she was repeatedly asked why she went back after she her first encounter with Epstein when she claims she was pressured into having sex with Epstein, she just says " it was easy money. "
@@katherinedohnalek7982 Oh right , would you pay someone who you have never met $12million for something you didn't do? My guess is that you wouldn't. I think you'd better tell Prince Andrew to stop playing the part of a guilty man, by avoiding the limelight which you used to crave.
@@StickyBud9395 First of all, I never said he did not have sex with her, although I have my doubts. I said that her claims of Prince Andrew having raped her are false if what she says is true. How can she accept $15,000 from Epstein to have sex with Prince Andrew, do it, then call it rape? How can she say she was underage when she was of legal age in every location? Why don't you do a bit of research and find the the facts of this case instead of jumping on the bandwagon of believing the bias headline news you were fed. Guiffre has carefully crafted her stories to the media to leave out any incriminating facts that would show her to be less than truthful. She was so innocent that she lived with a 65 year old man that was convicted of sex trafficking prior to moving back home to live with her dad. It was while she lived with her dad that she got a job at Trump's Mar-a-Lago where she got a job as a locker room attendant. Guiffre claims she was all alone, a child, no one to support her. While living with her father. Manipulating the media.
@@katherinedohnalek7982 So why did he pay out $12million, out of the goodness of his heart? You're either in love with Andrew or you're Her Majesty . Oh by the way , I never said she was innocent of anything.
@@StickyBud9395 The obvious answer, as it said all over believable media is because he was pressured to do so by his family. Particularly Prince Charles and William. Legal bills were mounting at $2000 an hour. Maybe they figured it would be cheaper to pay her off and be done with it. And I am not in love with Prince Andrew. I am after the truth and if this was you that had been wrongly accused, I would do the same.
Time for a prisoner swap. Take all those people who have been banged up because they have drug addiction problems, help them recover, and fill their vacant cells with the likes of Randy O'Windsor, Ms. Maxwell, Boofhead Boris and various judges, coppers and bankers.
When you use childish names like that it doesn't really help your cause. I get you probably think it's fun and clever, but really, it just makes you seem about 14 years old trying not to use naughty words in front of adults. Grow the fuck up
@@MrMichaeljhinde Like it or not the Royals do generate a lot of dollars in respect to tourism , even though I agree with their irrelevance in modern society.
Because of course the sons, daughters, hangers-on of parliamentarians and presidents are obviously above reproach and would never...... nah. It's irrelevant to republicanism.
@@shiraz1736 No they don't, the buildings and pageantry do, (how many visitors actually see the royal family?) which would still happen if we stopped paying the dysfunctional parasites and reclaimed all the land and property the state has given them.
If his His mum settles it.. The monarchy will lose all credibility, this monster is still romping around the palace, being protected.. He Should Be where we would be IN JAIL awaiting a real trial
What could possibly upset the monarchy so much about the content of Prince Phillips will that it had to be sealed for 90yrs. Phillip couldn’t get rid of Anthony Blunt from his art historian palace gig because Blunt knew too much about Phillips private life.
Wouldn't the staff and fellow customers at the Pizza Express in Woking remember a visit by Andrew and his daughters, or did they sit in the Range Rover while one of the security officers fetched them a take away?
I once saw a photo of Andrew's bed with all the cuddly toys. I remembered thinking at the time what's a grown man doing with cuddly toys on his bed and so many? I could understand a man keeping maybe a teddy bear from his childhood hidden under the pillow, but these were numerous and new looking. They looked like those cheap stuffed toys you could win at a carnival shooting gallery of my youth; all gaudy colours, full of little polystyrene balls, badly stitched and ready to fall apart. Ghastly things yet clearly treasured, in an otherwise bland but well appointed room fit for, well, fit for a prince. Gave me an eerie feeling about him, this was years ago. I felt the photo, featured in a newspaper, was an intrusion on his privacy, the story having nothing to do with his room or the toys and i felt bad for judging him and even looking at the picture. Forget what the article was about, but the image stayed with me. Now all this.
When Andrews dodgy friends told him that they had a nice little 14 year old that goes down smoothly he was disappointed to find they were talking about whiskey.
A man who served as a soldier on The Falklands for the whole of the combat told me that "war hero" Andrew was kept safely on Ascension Island until all of the fighting was over and was then flown in for a few hours for photo shoots posing in front of helicopters, the Governor's house etc. then whisked rapidly home again.
You know, whilst I do believe the majority of what has been said here, and I find people who knowingly have sex with under aged "partners" truly criminal, I cannot help but feel that the camera of investigation might just be turned on the victim for a second. Especially in cases like these. Why? Because around the world there are sex victims who are literally chained to the bed, tortured, and in some cases, killed. All this with absolutely no chance of a decision taken on the victims part. Yet, this young lady of 17 years of age, an age when I decided, as an "adult", to join the military and serve my country as soon as I was allowed to, decides on multiple occasions not to use the unlocked doors to make her "escape" but instead service the sexual requests of a bunch of losers who like f*****g kids! Where are the million dollar compensations for the true, living and dead, victims of torturous rape and other disgusting sexual crimes? So, yes, whilst we kick the sh** out of Andrew and the monarchy, can we just take one second to share a thought for the REAL victims of sexual crime here?!
I can't say for this case specifically, since it never went through as a criminal case, the investigation and all that it entails. But speaking generally, do you really think victims of sex crimes are only those that are chained? You are forgetting: there is a flight, fight and freeze response (the latter often gets missed). Victims for example of DV may feel like they need to stay in abusive relationships out of fear - so no physical chain but an emotional one.. Also about their age, it is known that the brain isn't fully formed until 23ish. Everyone is different, some may have more insecurities (maybe because of the life they lived and people around them), a predator knows to look for vulnerable people and knows how to exploit that vulnerability. So no, it aint that black and white
The alien shapeshifting lizard race have framed Prince Andrew when posing as him so the notorious picture of Andrew with his hand around that blond girl and Ghislaine to the right isn"n Andrew at all but an alien shapeshifting lizard man
*MY BEST FRIEND* turned out to be a sex trafficker - I did not need to wait for him to be arrested and tried and sentenced before I cut him out of my life completely... As soon as the penny dropped that he MIGHT be involved in something he was history; and I deeply regret being friends with such a terrible human being, its not hard, its the natural human reaction to hideous abusers that they make your stomach churn and your skin want to crawl off - I'm deeply embarrassed just writing this.
This payment should not stop any further proceedings against the Prince or Lies. He has utterly let the whole country down as someone who was seen as a respected ambassador and if he can find the money to “pay off” then I’m reasonably sure he can pay for further legal bills. A terrible disgrace.
We the UK are saying it's ok to be pedophile if your part of the royal family and can pay your way out of it 🤔💬🤔💬🤔💬 I don't see people making a stand about this
I hope you do realise that Michael Jackson's trial continued even after it was settled out of court. That was just the civil trial. Then again, reading the Daily Star, it makes sense that you'd arrive at the incorrect conclusion.
Yep, it wasn't MJ's choice that the criminal trial never happened. It was the Chandlers that caused the case to collapse. And as for the Arviso trial............ "Oh, he was going to kidnap me and take me to Brazil in an invisible hot air balloon!"
@@slopernafti902 The Arviso one did, but I think the comparison here was that there was a settlement made, which happened in the Chandler case. A suggestion that MJ paid out to avoid the trial, when it was actually the Chandlers that weren't interested in criminal prosecution.
Andrew now gets to live in taxpayer funded luxury without needing to lift a finger nor worrying about the dilemma of eating or heating that so many of us have to face.
Abolish the monarchy, enough is enough. It's time a family that enjoys limitless privilege and the misery of the poor comes to an end. I want to see them decide whether they eat or heat.
@@LambsyLamb All the MPs are just as bad!
@@LambsyLamb and also subjecting someone to be in constant cameras is tax payer funded abuse. They should live normally when they're born, cause they can't express political opinions, and are constantly scrutinised by press. Which sucks, plus it's a massive waste of money
@@CNoone-mc8dn _All the MPs are just as bad!_
At least they are elected. I know that most are bloody awful but they were selected.....
🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬
Oh the grand old duke of York
He had 12 million quid
He gave it all to an American girl
For something he never did!
Hear hear
And when he was up, he was up
And when he went down, he went down
But when he came to write his history
He was neither up nor down
He's not very bright but saying that given all their inbreeding I would expect them to be more Epstein than Einstein.
If he wanted to molest children, being a naval man he should've done it out at sea where no country has jurisdiction. I thought he knew that?
The grand old Duke of York’s accuser
Had 10,000 allegations
She took them all to the top of the hill … and she took them down again.
Pretty hypocritical she didn’t have the trial. I thought he couldn’t buy his way out of this?!?
@@pippipster6767 Did she ever say that? I think you are making it up. I did t quick google and couldn't see her saying anything like that, although I may be wrong, and you can easily prove me so.
To most people he just admitted his guilt to the entire world, maybe admitted it as many 12 million times.
The guardian says he lost everything, arguably he's lost nothing.
I think they are saying he has become persona non grata
At least he can't play dress up soldier anymore. Maybe he could wear a shell suit instead.
Might have if he has left a tiny bit of decency in him...if the tax payers are happy to give away for hypocrites like him, then no worries... yea, we have the heritage of Victorian hypocrisy too...😂namely, proud progressive people still admiring the the age old, literally bloody empire in this 21st century democratic world!! what a proud moment to cherish🤣
He have everything
His Mummy is footing the bill, like the spoilt little brat that he is.
Nobody leaves a pint of Guinness untouched, on the bar, for near 5 mins. I’ll do my own research from now on. That’s straight up disrespectful
Don't you have to let it settle? 5 minutes seems about right to me. . .
You want an instant hit, try lowenbrau ( laughing- brew) 😋
I hope Guinness has sponsored the video! I would switch back from Murphy's if that was true.
I'm Irish. That's how long you leave it, I've seen fellas wait half an hour. You have let it settle, though that's a poor looking pint with a thin head on it.
It's not just Andrew, all the royals are dodgy. Keep questionable company and abuse their expenses. Anne has used helicopters to attend horse events, hardly appropriate. Charles has been implicated in giving honours to people through one of his charities. It's all at murky, deliberately so. Do we really want these people as head of state? Do we need a head of state, especially this family, any of them?
Sir jimmy savil nuff said!
bUt WhAt AbOuT tHe ToUrIsM?
@@SuperNeilAdams Not that old chestnut! Plenty of tourist at Versailles, France, long after their monarchy was over. Without the royals in residence tourists would be able to visit throughout the palaces and castles they now occupy.
@@SuperNeilAdams
The Netherlands have Royal families but hardly anyone touts tourism as a reason to keep them. Many tourists prefer to go to already established hot spots to enjoy the Netherlands such as rotterdam, Amsterdam, Copenhagen and so on
I can tell you guys have a keen sense for sarcasm.
The British royal family have never been above us in their behaviour - just got away with it
"it's the rich what gets the pleasure,
and the poor what gets the pain,
it's the same the whole world over,
isn't it a fking shame."
Who's up for a revolution?✊✊✊
@Graham Hugh Wilson I'm not sure that everyone understands how corrupt everything is, I'm not sure a lot of UK citizens are bright enough to understand.
They read the Daily Mail and Express and believe all the racist, nationalist bullshit they print every day, without a thought to who owns the newspaper and what their agenda is, the print and broadcast media have enabled these treacherous bastards to rob the public blind, we need true revolt in the UK and we need it whilst there is still something worth fighting for...
Britain is like a melting pot. The scum always rises to the top.
If he denies he did anything wrong then why did he settle out of court and pay £12m? Sounds like he actually did it.
Of course he did it! He said he didn't know Virginia Roberts Guiffre so why give a stranger 12 million?
Did what? He knows that everyone knows he shagged her so what are you talking about?
He paid her off because he didn't want to be forced to discuss it in court. Isn't that completely obvious?
Aassddff, absolutely correct.
aassddff And didn’t want to be charged with and found guilty of sexual abuse.
Can you imagine how he would have performed under cross examination? The Maitlis interview gave us just a taste of his arrogance, self entitlement and total lack of empathy.Virginia Guiffre had lined up one of the best lawyers in the US so if it had gone to court it would have been a total shitshow for Andrew.Personally,I would have loved to see him squirm.
NEVER forget Johnson's enthusiastic endorsement of the Royals : 'Beyond reproach'. Yeah?
We all know Boris would not tell a lie. ?
Aitken says Andrew need not worry the British public are very forgiving
@@peterdockrill9653 Yes look how soon they forgave Dianna's murderers
Well, apart from Prince Charles' dodgy mates:
Laurens van der Post, who allegedly encouraged Charles to talk to plants and got a 14 year old girl pregnant.
Bishop Ball, who persuaded young men to engage in naked praying.
Sir Jimmy Savile who was allegedly a marriage counsellor to Charles and Di...
Then there was Prince Philip's brother in laws in the SS...
And the Duke of Windsor and his weakness for the Third Reich...
And Prince Andrew's true father, most likely Lord Porchester....
But apart from that, the Royals are totally above reproach!
Been saying it for years…..REPUBLIC. Get rid of the monarchy. I knew Andrew would get away with it, the rich always do.
We Scots have long enough suffered ,Anglo Saxon Hunnish depredations; not to mention induced famines and massacres seemingly in perpetuity! BUT WHAT THE FUCK!!!!! WHA' S FUCKED MA TEDDY Bears!
Hereditary monarchy has no place in a modern democratic society Tom paine said it ,common sense The rights off man around 1750s
Paying someone off is a classic admittance of weakness and guilt. If you are innocent and believe it 100% you would not open your (wait public wallet) to pay someone off…corruption again.
Or maybe mummy told him to bloody sort it, I’ve got an important birthday to be at and your fu@@ing it up.
Also he's still claiming he's never even met her but decides to give her 12 million?
Of course you would not. Innocent people do not settle, they demand their day in court because they are innocent and when you are innocent there is no evidence against you.
@@David-xp7sr especially for crimes like noncing.
@@stktriz That's the crux of the matter!! Giving millions to a stranger. Guilty as charged
In a healthy society news of 2 Princes being investigated for breaking child exploitation and charity corruption laws would result in a rejection of the whole institution
He has lost the thing he loves most,being important,no one looks at him now with anything other than disgust.
Only in decent circles. But the people who really count, politicians and the rich, will still be fine with him.
there is no place for monarchy in modern society .
Your wrong and ignorant.
How?
£12,000,000 of British taxpayers money. 😡🤬
nah, will be paid by the cash-for-honors from Charles
Like I mentioned earlier, who's up for a revolution?
A disgrace combine this with the billions the government are emptying out in front of our very eyes…the whole lot royals and politicians need removing from power/control - people have had enough
@@DarrenJCalvert well, for the government, we have elections, so I have no problem with them. But the royal family... As long as they procreate, they stay...
@@DarrenJCalvert I'm serious about a revolution, the establishment is taking us all for fools, they are a tiny minority whilst we are tens of millions.
We could have them all locked up by lunchtime and use their assets to build a beautiful poverty-free, homeless-free, debt-free country for all future generations to enjoy...
He can now relax and go back to positioning his Teddy bears in height order.
And abusing young girls in peace.
The whole damn family is a mess. Just found out today the police are investigating Prince Charles, too.
Watch the video about Charles and the duchy of Cornwall on the Republic campaign RUclips channel then you'll see how criminal he is.
@@LambsyLamb They are of class. Low Class i mean. Mistress, Adulterer, Crooks, Promiscuous, concubines pedophiles etc.
Not only cash for honors but he was BBF with Savile, peter ball and Mountbatten. All known pedophiles.
@@mayrav1155 Agreed, you forgot lacking empathy and inbred too! 😉
Charles also wanted to be Camilla's tampon according to one of his private conversations! Ewwwww
Wasn't said by a member of the Royal family that said 'you can do anything you want in this country, just as long as you don't get caught'.
As a matter of logic, that applies to every country.
@@pippipster6767 ...and you don't even have to be a royal, either. 😏
The issue isn't on of logic, it's a direct quote.
@@audreybarnes6527
Yes, okay. But why should we be surprised? After all they are merely human beings who have been bizarrely elevated by other human beings for no reason.
@@pippipster6767 It's a mistake to oversimplify ❤️
Perfectly crafted, embarrassed to admit I didn't know about the dubious guest to his daughter's wedding. Thanks for the education. Please keep them coming.
Seeing the damage that has been inflicted by Andrew on himself and his family, and the fact he’s pretty much lost everything. You’d kind of expect him to be going in to court, head held high screaming from the roof tops that he is innocent and will prove it. I never expected an innocent man to be paying for his accusers silence.
He's a deplorable, morally bankrupt nonce...
@@jasonbyrne8487 dont forget this is the american legal system. Tried and true method of getting a result is involve expensive lawyers. Either the defendant or the accuser cant afford it OR its just cheaper to settle than go through years of lawyers pay checks. No body gets charged with anything....including the accuser even if the allegations are false.
@@heneo I don’t think money is the issue somehow and I suspect Andrew has far more reserves than that of his accuser. The threshold for any civil action is far lesser than that of a criminal offence. Irrespective, if I hadn’t done anything wrong then I’d personally rather die living on my feet defending my name than live on my knees known globally as the Prince who gagged his accuser and was best mates with a convicted sex offender.
@@heneo Nobody pays someone they have never met £12 million and covers the court costs and legal fees, Nonce Andrew is as guilty as sin...
He's not lost anything of particular value. He's still rich. Mummy (ie us the tax payer) still pay for everything. He still has access to corrupt politicians and I strongly suspect there will be a long campaign to 'rehabilitate' his image.
I have spoken to sailors who served with him, let's just say his preference for 'young meat' was known about back in the 80's.
He says also he has never met Sarah Fergerson and his children ...
Thanks 🙏 world 🌎 class reporting
This prince Andrew situation is just diabolical, I totally agree with you mate, the right place for him is prison, you're absolutely right, but instead now we tax payers have to finance his useless lifestyle, it's just not on, is it ? £12M to settle a situation which should've been settled ages ago, but instead mummy have to sort for him, and paid by us normal stupid citizens, how fair is that ehi, I wonder !? Not at all it's the answer, not in the slightest !! Just makes me so angry, it's unbelievable 😤
20p from everyone? 12/60.
It’s a load of nonce sense
@@bid84 😂 👍
@@bid84 Or should that be: nonce cents?
@@morningstar9233 well played 😅
Royals have been screwing around since time began.....it's NEVER been "an esteemed institution" 😂😂😂
Out of curiosity : where is the money coming from ? I understand the Queen will help him pay the bill, but where does she get that money ?
Also, the US justice system is pretty shocking. Being rich allows you to buy your way out of prison.
Taxpayers money
The queen gets the money from human trafficing, sex trafficing, illegal arms sales, drug running, and rigging everything stocks insider trading off shore accounts paridice pappers BCCI, BIG BANKS are involved
@@MHMHMH97 I always thought taxpayers money didn't go to the royal family, except for their official duties. Well, I guess some of the 1,5% increase on NI might be reallocated to this family in need ..
@@Chris-sx6kc I thought the same, but it does, remember not so long ago they're using 350 million taxpayers money to renovate Buckingham palace, in the name of boosting tourism.
@@MHMHMH97 Ouch, I remember reading something about that, didnt remember the amount !! I hope the ticket cost (30£/55£) goes back to the taxpayers and not them !!
Totally agreed - he's a total embarrassment to our country. What a plonker.
Remember, they were ALL friendly with Jimmy Seville.
Typical how these Toffs always get away from trouble THEY cause. Joe public would be jailed
How can he look his own daughters in the eyes without feeling shame. He must recall they were 17yrs old once.
It's simple, his selfish arrogance 🤮.
He is guilty, I'm happy for Virginia to exposed his crimes.
How can someone born into wealth and privilege from a family so many want to model themselves on, be so unquestionably corrupt and amoral.
Why the British public continue to tolerate paying for this disfunctional family to live this scandiously wealthy lifestyle, (whilst so many contributing to their vulgar spending) cannot even feed their own family adequately!
The British puppets , aka the british voter . Expect no changes .
Ms. Lum Wai. Please don’t generalise. It’s totally unfair. What would happen if I generalised that all people of African or Asian origin were ALL like you describe the Royal Family ? It wouldn’t surprise me if I was called a racist and justifiably so.
It says all you need to know about the disgusting self important self serving mind set of the royal family (not the Queen). Prince Charles is not far being his sleazy brother in this and it will be a disgrace and embarrassment to the U.K. if Charlie boy and Camilla end up as our king and queen - get rid of all of them .
What about the cash for honours and citizenship?
I wish you'd open your eyes. The Queen is just as bad as her rotten family if not worse. She ordered a new state coach on the same day the bedroom tax was introduced thereby making the sickest, most vulnerable people in this country pay for a mode of transport only used on state occasions, Maybe once a year. At the start of the pandemic when Boris was throwing money around furloughing people, the Queen sacked people working at the various palaces "because nobody was visiting". The richest woman in the country could easily afford to furlough a few workers who were probably being paid minimum wage anyway decided she'd rather just dump them because it was inconvenient to show some humanity to fellow humans. The same Queen who for decades has told people they should be concerned about others. Disgusting creatures
@@davidh4514 that was the government.
You say not the queen yet she’s paying to keep a woman silent. She is just as bad.
@@zhain0 prince's foundation police investigation into citizenship and honours scandal for a Saudi guy, govt have always done it.
Did no one ever question the staff at Pizza Express? It's not everyday a member of the royal family brings his kids in, is it. I think you'd remember, I think I would. I remember the one occasion I got close to the Queen, whilst flattening out the turf (a half time tradition) at a polo event in Windsor Great Park (I was there working, for a living, unlike any of them). You remember stiff like that.
Why hasn’t his slyness bodyguards logbooks been looked at + plus if he was in the pizza place the workers surely would of asked for a photo or made the locals news🙈
And these are just the things we know about. The corruption in this world is insane yet most of it goes on without notice since the rich just pay to keep it quiet
Prince Andrew's basically a Royal Jimmy Savile.
Don’t forget Charles was BBF with Savile, Peter ball, and Mountbatten.
That's an insult to Sir Jimmy!
It's a disgrace ! You're quite right,so, he's denied everything is complete blameless,guilty of no 'wrongdoing' ( I hate that word),so why is he shellin out supposedly £12 mill to a woman he's never met ? Very strange,oh,and the dosh ? The British taxpayer will take care of that.A real shame that girl didn't take him to court.Hes pretty much got away with it then.Hes lost a few titles an bling,so what,he'll want for nothing in the future,a comfy life assured.Im not happy.
If he's so guilty - why is she just taking the cash? Nothing says false accusation like a financial settlement.
After his interview that showed he was as guilty as could be there isn't a defence lawyer who would put Andrew on the stand anywhere in the world, Andrew would crap himself
@@mypointofview1111 if that's true why would she settle without an admission?
Well said you speak the truth we the vast majority of the public have had enough after the queen it should all end ...
Bernadette Crawford
Yes they really need to be consigned to history.
It's time for England to grow up and break up the firm, as the monarchy is an outdated concept
@@siversurfer3541 lucky its mainly just symbolic then.
@@zhain0
Or shambolic.
@@siversurfer3541 you can do better than that
He's guilty as sin & paid his way out of prison with 'taxpayer' money. That money should be helping the cold & hungry Brits. So wrong in so many ways🤬
There was a vicious rumour going around just Christmas past that there was a special Prince Andrew advent calendar made. But they were all said to be faulty, as only the flaps from 12 to 17 were able to be opened.
😭😭😭😭
his nam,e still appears in maxwells book, was still named as a passenger on the lolita express!
As soon as I saw his face in that interview , I thought he looks so guilty , everyone knew he would get away with this , if a poor person did this it would he would be put in prison because he can't pay off the accuser , one rule for the rich and another for the peasants .
He is not guilty. If you would do a bit of research you would find everything Guiffre accused Prince Andrew of is a lie. Prince Andrew is not Epstein. Even if her accusation that he had sex with her at the 3 locations were true, she was of legal age at all 3 and not a " baby " or a " child " as she so piteously declared. Then the fact that she claims Epstein offered her $15,000 to have sex with Prince Andrew, if it were true, then she knew beforehand what she was going to do, so it could not have been sexual assault. Guiffre first got involved with Epstein when she was asked to give a total stranger, a rich man a massage. At 16, after having lived with a 69 yr old who was convicted of sex trafficking before she even met Epstein, Guiffre was not an innocent " baby " and knew quite well what a massage meant. Then, when she was repeatedly asked why she went back after she her first encounter with Epstein when she claims she was pressured into having sex with Epstein, she just says " it was easy money. "
@@katherinedohnalek7982 Oh right , would you pay someone who you have never met $12million for something you didn't do? My guess is that you wouldn't. I think you'd better tell Prince Andrew to stop playing the part of a guilty man, by avoiding the limelight which you used to crave.
@@StickyBud9395 First of all, I never said he did not have sex with her, although I have my doubts. I said that her claims of Prince Andrew having raped her are false if what she says is true. How can she accept $15,000 from Epstein to have sex with Prince Andrew, do it, then call it rape? How can she say she was underage when she was of legal age in every location? Why don't you do a bit of research and find the the facts of this case instead of jumping on the bandwagon of believing the bias headline news you were fed. Guiffre has carefully crafted her stories to the media to leave out any incriminating facts that would show her to be less than truthful. She was so innocent that she lived with a 65 year old man that was convicted of sex trafficking prior to moving back home to live with her dad. It was while she lived with her dad that she got a job at Trump's Mar-a-Lago where she got a job as a locker room attendant. Guiffre claims she was all alone, a child, no one to support her. While living with her father. Manipulating the media.
@@katherinedohnalek7982 So why did he pay out $12million, out of the goodness of his heart? You're either in love with Andrew or you're Her Majesty . Oh by the way , I never said she was innocent of anything.
@@StickyBud9395 The obvious answer, as it said all over believable media is because he was pressured to do so by his family. Particularly Prince Charles and William. Legal bills were mounting at $2000 an hour. Maybe they figured it would be cheaper to pay her off and be done with it. And I am not in love with Prince Andrew. I am after the truth and if this was you that had been wrongly accused, I would do the same.
You now know why Harry ran off
Yes
Harry's a simp. She wears the trousers in that relationship. The lot of them can rot for all I care
Great work Joe thanks for posting
Time for a prisoner swap. Take all those people who have been banged up because they have drug addiction problems, help them recover, and fill their vacant cells with the likes of Randy O'Windsor, Ms. Maxwell, Boofhead Boris and various judges, coppers and bankers.
When you use childish names like that it doesn't really help your cause. I get you probably think it's fun and clever, but really, it just makes you seem about 14 years old trying not to use naughty words in front of adults. Grow the fuck up
This gives us a bloody good reason to abolish our monarchy and move to a parliamentary republic
We could all bow to Boris.
Haha I think there is merit in abolition, but getting Boris or similar as head of state doesn't really feel like it'd be any better 😅
@@MrMichaeljhinde Like it or not the Royals do generate a lot of dollars in respect to tourism , even though I agree with their irrelevance in modern society.
Because of course the sons, daughters, hangers-on of parliamentarians and presidents are obviously above reproach and would never...... nah. It's irrelevant to republicanism.
@@shiraz1736 No they don't, the buildings and pageantry do, (how many visitors actually see the royal family?) which would still happen if we stopped paying the dysfunctional parasites and reclaimed all the land and property the state has given them.
If his His mum settles it.. The monarchy will lose all credibility, this monster is still romping around the palace, being protected.. He Should Be where we would be IN JAIL awaiting a real trial
We know pigs dont sweat but put him on the stand with video evidence marked :young(name) and adult(name) ready to roll, bet he sweats then! 😀😃😅😂🤣😆😁
What could possibly upset the monarchy so much about the content of Prince Phillips will that it had to be sealed for 90yrs.
Phillip couldn’t get rid of Anthony Blunt from his art historian palace gig because Blunt knew too much about Phillips private life.
Exactly, Prince Philip was a renowned womaniser , racist , xenophobic, snob . The abuse I got because I was indifferent 😕 to his passing ..
Spot on , got the story very well covered
Wouldn't the staff and fellow customers at the Pizza Express in Woking remember a visit by Andrew and his daughters, or did they sit in the Range Rover while one of the security officers fetched them a take away?
Was a birthday party at Pizza Express, they couldn't be part of that if they sat in a car!
Andrew is an embarrassment to the Royal Family and Queen!!!
Nicely done Joe.
I’m not so sure that the “trade” part of Trade Envoy meant what the man on the street assumed it meant.
"Man will never be free until the last king is strangled with the entrails of the last priest." Denis Diderot
Thanks, just educated myself about Diderot!
Fatastic, I'll remember that as my go-to quote in future when things really begin to hot up.
Nice one joe 👍
Maybe he can get sponsored by Richmond Sausages...The Duke of Pork Royal Bangers
So pleased you made this video
You write with so much wit best laugh thank you x
I once saw a photo of Andrew's bed with all the cuddly toys. I remembered thinking at the time what's a grown man doing with cuddly toys on his bed and so many? I could understand a man keeping maybe a teddy bear from his childhood hidden under the pillow, but these were numerous and new looking. They looked like those cheap stuffed toys you could win at a carnival shooting gallery of my youth; all gaudy colours, full of little polystyrene balls, badly stitched and ready to fall apart. Ghastly things yet clearly treasured, in an otherwise bland but well appointed room fit for, well, fit for a prince. Gave me an eerie feeling about him, this was years ago. I felt the photo, featured in a newspaper, was an intrusion on his privacy, the story having nothing to do with his room or the toys and i felt bad for judging him and even looking at the picture. Forget what the article was about, but the image stayed with me. Now all this.
Charlie with Jimmy Saville, Andy with Jeffrey, pure slime.
Sounds about right
Taxpayer here . . . .
The monarchy should be abolished!! Then GB could put that money to much more deserving causes.
I almost feel sorry for those two daughters … having the most embarrassing parents in the WORLD.
Yep, and every time they look in the mirror they see his likeness. Their husbands will see it too, ffs!
"Trade envoy" in this case means "little bitch of some really psychopathic arms dealers"
Andrew Windsor as plenty of money off shore helped by his piedo mates maxwell and co
When Andrews dodgy friends told him that they had a nice little 14 year old that goes down smoothly he was disappointed to find they were talking about whiskey.
that is an expensive pizza hut visit.
A man who served as a soldier on The Falklands for the whole of the combat told me that "war hero" Andrew was kept safely on Ascension Island until all of the fighting was over and was then flown in for a few hours for photo shoots posing in front of helicopters, the Governor's house etc. then whisked rapidly home again.
even that made him shit himself
Then why do many other men that served with him say he was there regularly flying in front of those ships?
@@katherinedohnalek7982 flying unzipped ?
Thanks for this update!!
And there's more...
Gaddafi was everyone’s best mate until everyone found a way to get the oil without him.
Blair was his BFF
Exactly… until Blair decided he wasnt and Bush was.
Blair took tips from Gaddafi on how to maintain a divided population. And here we are...
Referendum to end the monarchy right now!
How he got away with this I'll never know,he as an income from he's mum of 240k a year where does his money come from, oh yet it's us the tax payers
Let's not forget the royal families connection to saville as well.
You know, whilst I do believe the majority of what has been said here, and I find people who knowingly have sex with under aged "partners" truly criminal, I cannot help but feel that the camera of investigation might just be turned on the victim for a second. Especially in cases like these. Why? Because around the world there are sex victims who are literally chained to the bed, tortured, and in some cases, killed. All this with absolutely no chance of a decision taken on the victims part. Yet, this young lady of 17 years of age, an age when I decided, as an "adult", to join the military and serve my country as soon as I was allowed to, decides on multiple occasions not to use the unlocked doors to make her "escape" but instead service the sexual requests of a bunch of losers who like f*****g kids! Where are the million dollar compensations for the true, living and dead, victims of torturous rape and other disgusting sexual crimes? So, yes, whilst we kick the sh** out of Andrew and the monarchy, can we just take one second to share a thought for the REAL victims of sexual crime here?!
Correct indeed my friend !
I can't say for this case specifically, since it never went through as a criminal case, the investigation and all that it entails.
But speaking generally, do you really think victims of sex crimes are only those that are chained? You are forgetting: there is a flight, fight and freeze response (the latter often gets missed).
Victims for example of DV may feel like they need to stay in abusive relationships out of fear - so no physical chain but an emotional one.. Also about their age, it is known that the brain isn't fully formed until 23ish. Everyone is different, some may have more insecurities (maybe because of the life they lived and people around them), a predator knows to look for vulnerable people and knows how to exploit that vulnerability. So no, it aint that black and white
I am 75, and still feel the pain of being raped repeatedly by a priest ages 4-8.
Rape tears the body and mind.
In the American press they always say Clinton, Trump, and the frequent flyer Prince Andrew. LOL
settled out of court = a very guilty and grubby bastard indeed, god save the queen lmfao.
You should do another one on Prince William and his affair
It’s no sweat for Andrew, is it. Mumzy will take care of everything, after all.
If you were in deep s - - t wouldn’t you want your mother to help you out ? Who knows what will happen ? Don’t take things for granted.
Mumzy will take care of NOTHING! Not financially, at least! THAT will be the questionable 'privilege' of the British taxpayer!
This should never have been about the money. It should have been prison or freedom...
His philosophy is......if you can't find a 20 year old ? Settle for two ten year olds ....Only the super rich can get away with such crimes ..
Shocking !!! Why oh why do they try to hide !!!
You going to drink that pint or what?
Close the treacherous gaggle down once and for all. Many 'commonwealth' counties will become republics once the queen passes, no doubt.
The alien shapeshifting lizard race have framed Prince Andrew when posing as him so the notorious picture of Andrew with his hand around that blond girl and Ghislaine to the right isn"n Andrew at all but an alien shapeshifting lizard man
*MY BEST FRIEND* turned out to be a sex trafficker - I did not need to wait for him to be arrested and tried and sentenced before I cut him out of my life completely...
As soon as the penny dropped that he MIGHT be involved in something he was history; and I deeply regret being friends with such a terrible human being, its not hard, its the natural human reaction to hideous abusers that they make your stomach churn and your skin want to crawl off - I'm deeply embarrassed just writing this.
The very good news is it's going to be very windy in the English channel for the next few days !!!
I don't get why they just don't call it blowy Andrew 😂🤣 it's around 50mph outside right now
This payment should not stop any further proceedings against the Prince or Lies. He has utterly let the whole country down as someone who was seen as a respected ambassador and if he can find the money to “pay off” then I’m reasonably sure he can pay for further legal bills. A terrible disgrace.
We the UK are saying it's ok to be pedophile if your part of the royal family and can pay your way out of it 🤔💬🤔💬🤔💬 I don't see people making a stand about this
Love your style
if he didnt do it why did epstein become friends with him then?
Leaving a pint of Guinness unattended while the head goes dead is right up there......
I bet she was threatened by the powers that be, this whole thing stinks
So true 👍
Sarah Fergason being one of the disgusting things he's done... 🤣
@Andy Rumming Maybe she became aware of the kind of person he was, and got the hell out?
@@gwarlow - It doesn't strop her looking disgusting though does it... 🤣
I am innocent - here take £12M - aye right!
Im annoyed. He didn't molest me either but i have not received money from him!
There's a video on bit chute saying the Queen is paying her $16 million that means us the tax payers.
Ur awesome Joe....
I hope you do realise that Michael Jackson's trial continued even after it was settled out of court. That was just the civil trial. Then again, reading the Daily Star, it makes sense that you'd arrive at the incorrect conclusion.
Yep, it wasn't MJ's choice that the criminal trial never happened. It was the Chandlers that caused the case to collapse.
And as for the Arviso trial............ "Oh, he was going to kidnap me and take me to Brazil in an invisible hot air balloon!"
@@surfdigby The criminal trial did happen, though.
@@slopernafti902 The Arviso one did, but I think the comparison here was that there was a settlement made, which happened in the Chandler case. A suggestion that MJ paid out to avoid the trial, when it was actually the Chandlers that weren't interested in criminal prosecution.
@@surfdigby Ah, yes, thanks for the correction.
The Star was chosen purely for the headline. Hence holding it to camera. This seems very obvious to me.
He “indirectly” admitted what he is accused of by paying her!! 👍 Please leave the poor man alone now!! Nobody is infallible!!! 😡😡😡