Judging the Justices: Epstein and Yoo on the New Originalist Supreme Court
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 25 янв 2022
- Recorded on January 20, 2022
In what has now become an annual tradition on Uncommon Knowledge with Peter Robinson, law professors John Yoo and Richard Epstein join the show to opine on a newly minted Supreme Court. For the first time in decades, today’s court is dominated by a majority of originalist justices-justices who believe the Constitution means today just what the document meant when it was ratified more than 200 years ago. The professors discuss and analyze Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (the case that may overturn Roe v. Wade), the court’s ruling on mask mandates, voting rights legislation, and other cases to watch. The professors also reminisce about the time the current president of the United States waved a book authored by a then unknown law professor on national television during Clarence Thomas’s confirmation hearing. As usual, our yearly show with professors Epstein and Yoo is the closest you can get to law school without having to take the LSATs.
For further information:
www.hoover.org/publications/u...
Interested in exclusive Uncommon Knowledge content? Check out Uncommon Knowledge on social media!
Facebook: / uncknowledge
Twitter: / uncknowledge
Instagram: / uncommon_knowledge_show
If Roe had been decided in 1972, I might not have had the courage to have our son. As a couple, my husband and I were not really ready to start a family because he was still studying and his visa was about to expire. In addition, my uncle’s wife told me that my father had suffered from epilepsy and I should not have children because they would also suffer from epilepsy. She claimed that epilepsy skips a generation. I was hysterical after hearing her on the phone as my husband arrived to calm me down and assure me that his mom in El Salvador would help us with our child if he/she had health complications. On Sunday Dean Dimmick of St. Mary’s Cathedral in Memphis, where abortion was still illegal, visited the confirmation class. I helped an elder of the cathedral with the class but it was a preteen, totally unaware of my pregnancy, who asked Dean Dimmick when life begins. Dean Dimmick chuckled and his rosey cheeks became even rosier but he said that the Episcopal Church (at that time) had declared that life begins at conception. That was my first encounter with a personal God. I took the experience with a leap of faith and everything worked together for our good and for that of our marvelous son, now 49 years old - a fabulous son, husband, father, friend, student and professional. I have boycotted, opined, signed petitions so no woman would be so tempted again to kill her own baby. Our son and his sister, born at seven months and weighing only 3 lbs 15 ounces, were both doomed to be terminated by the doctors who examined me; but our children and their children are our treasure and so much better than we.
I love listening to John Yoo. The way he sprinkles humor in with erudition is top notch.
I could watch 1000 hours of them talking about different legal issues
Herding cats here today - more material than there was time. Would have enjoyed a 2 hr show with these guys
22:27 I also disagree with John. You don't leave a person's constitutionally protected god-given (natural) rights, freedoms, and civil liberties up to a democracy where the majority can vote to severely curtail the minority, which in this case is a defenseless one, the unborn human child. Our constitutionally limited federal republic was created to defend against the tyranny of mob rule and popular opinion (democracy) as well as the tyranny of big government.
Watching Peter and John wrestle with Richard is just soooo much fun! It makes for a good show.
I always enjoy listening to Richard Epstein's short appearances on the John Batchelor show.
This is the first time I've heard him in a long form interview.
Excellent conversation. John Yoo is great as well.
I live for these 3 in a sit down
Peter, I love you. Great Series. Please stop interrupting your fine guests. OK. So you made preparations, but let those give way to these bright guys. And this comment isnt only for this particular episode.
This non Lawyer really loved this discussion. Thank you.
I really should have gone into law. I love listening to this stuff. Thank you.
Would love to hear Woo without Epstein interrupting him.
Judges should not be left or right. This is the problem.
Excellent conversation, hope you do this again.
Also would love to hear how Tom Sowell is going
After watching this, I immediately viewed an episode with Robinson interviewing Epstein from five years ago. In that episode, Epstein threw a Latin phrase at Peter, "May justice reign though the heavens may fall." I don't know if Peter was throwing it back at and Epstein forgot, or if it was just coincidence, but it was a great call back!
As a retired lawyer, I love this stuff.
He nailed it. It was overturned! This convo is relative now more than ever. So happy it’s been sent to the states where it belongs.
Great to have these two back. Always entertaining. Btw I’m first!
Always a pleasure listening to this trio.
Fascinating discussion! Thank you.
Excellent interview and discussion.
I thoroughly enjoyed the 3-way discussion of these 3 men, but throughout, I could not help but wish that Peterson would follow up this event with 2 separate discussions, one with Epstein and another with Yoo. Throw in some discussion about why they agree and disagree with each other.
Of course, very interesting and educational. But I don't think I've ever heard Peter Robinson interrupt so frequently. Of course, if he hadn't, it would have been an Epstein monologue. Always the best program that I can find!
That was an amazing episode. The buddy cop dynamic was fantastic.
It occurs to Me that the capital building really doesn’t have any no trespassing signs around it
This show is SO much better than Goodfellows
Where do John Yoo and Richard Epstein purchase their crystal balls at? This video is so much better than the hour of my life I wasted listening to NPR's analysis of a possible decision.
Fantastic! My favorite episode and I love them all!
Good timing on the Supreme Court subject matter of this video, what with Stephen Breyer announcing his retirement ...at the end of his term (which isn't limited, lol).
Epstein interrupting Yoo every single time was a bit much. "Three's a crowd"
That was very entertaining (and informative)!
Are you sure the justices don’t know what they are doing I have to give them credit for being politicians and if they’re politicians they know what they’re doing.
I want Yoo for Yoo S president
Great, informative discussion!
I love this stuff!
This was good. REALLY good.
Does anybody know the music score at the intro of video???
Anyone else cringe at the statement “compromise on constitutional principle” 😖
Mr epstein can you try to lobby Audible to get your books on there? Also peter can you get more tom sowell books on there? I flew through all of them, im on my second and third round for some
Sheesh, just read the Constitution. The best stability is that EVERYONE can read it and understand what it means. Instability is a Hammurabi Code that only the elite can decipher.
Breyer's retirement kinda takes the wind out of this one. bad luck, recording it last week.
@57:00 Congressional Committee assignments topic…3 for 3 tonight!
I love both of these guys, but you really need to interview them separately. They have a hard time not talking over each other.
fantastic
Thank you for posting these informative conversations. I do wish Epstein had been allowed to speak more but understand there were time constraints.
Thank God for an original isn't court!
I love these two guys and their barbed repartee
Who’s on first?
great discussion! especially listening now after roe has been struck down. i hope this means many American babies, and future American Feynmans and Usain bolts and hakuhos and lasha talakhsdzes and ramanujans!!
Mr. Robinson: Please stop intervening and interrupting your guests. You are not helping your listeners to benefit from the arguments advanced on this important topic.
good questions by Mr. Robinson, but sir, can you please let the guests finish their thoughts.
My body my choice, the fetus contains DNA is not the same as the mother and is not part of her body
Mr. Epstein should have been in the Supreme Court.
Epstein should be on the Supreme Court.
I guess we're bout to have a black woman on the bench.
abortion: it's not about when does *_LIFE_* begin (that is obviously before or at the point that the egg is fertalized) ... instead it's about when is the organism a *_HUMAN BEING_* ... why do people talk about when life begins?
Yoo seems political, rather than focused on the law and the Constitution. I don’t see a true fidelity to principles.