The Airbus H155 is the newest EC365 Dolphin. It’s still being produced just under a different name. At 13:29 the helicopter you’re showing most of the time is the EC/Airbus H145.
@@ChrisN85420 By definition, from the Merriam-Webster dictionary, a helicopter is "an aircraft whose lift is derived from the aerodynamic forces acting on one or more powered rotors turning about substantially vertical axes." While the Osprey's rotors can and often do operate horizontally, they still operate about a "substantially vertical axes" for all landing and take off scenarios. By the strictest sense, I would say that the Osprey is in fact a helicopter, but a specialized type of one. Thoughts?
@@paulswarthout9967 If it was a helicopter you would think it would be classified as one and it definitely isn’t. A VTOAL has it’s own separate category and that’s what gets me to be honest with you. But I agree it’s definitely got helicopter capabilities.
First speed is not a paramount criterium to assess the efficiency of a helicopter and second this type of classification is very subjective. Good video for teenagers, so to speak. 1:53: Regarding the NH90: I've been working on this program for about 10 years and indeed there has been some technical issues but absolutely not related to FBW controls. We even didn't expected them to work so well: no problem at all. The main difficulties were related to the specifications of this H/C taking into account contradictory requirements from the 4 Nations involved in it's development. 4 Nations but ... 8 services (4 Navies, 3 Army Aviations, 1 Air Force)! The main constraints were related to Navy requirements as height and weight in relation with the specifics of the various fregates since basicallyt it was designed as a Navy helicopter to replace the Lynx ans Sea Kings. To make it short this led to an "imperfect" shape inducing some vibratrion issues not easy to fix but nothing to do with FBW. At last, although Norwegians and Australians have been "annoying customers", to say the least, their termination of the contract has very little to do with the H/C itself: - Norway got the NH90 in the frame of a "Scandinavian contract" involving Norway, Sweden, Finland and Danemark. Denmark withdrew quite soon from this contract to buy the EH101, if I remember correctly, and among the 3 others, only Norway (the only NATO member by chance...) had "technical problems" ... - Australia is even worse: they terminated, at the same time, a major submarine contract with France, the NH90 AND the Tiger helicopter under the pressure of their American master for auguing that these helicopters didn't "meet their operational requirements" ... it was time to notice that! Why then did they purchase them following months of negociations and tests? In the case of Australia it's purely and clearly political. "The NH90 will be a short-lived helicopter": I don't know, it's not obvious and you don't know either. Be careful with statements about topics you don't master. 13:13: these are Mi24, not Mi28 13:45: this is not an EC155 at all (which is an evolution of the SA365 Dauphin, so to speak). It's an EC135, not the same category 23:41: the V22 is not a helicopter, it's an unclassified thing, something in between with its own advantages and disadvantages, very expensive but neither a helicopter nor an airplane, not as efficient as a helicopter in the H/C flight enveloppe and not as efficient as an airplane when compared to fixed wing aircrafts. It won't probably have any successor. My opinion
I think what I found most amazing by this video was that the word "fast" is not really a feature of traditional helicopter design. The difference between the slowest helicopter on this list and the fastest, traditional, helicopter is just a few miles per hour. Could it be that pushing a rotating blade horizontally through the air, is a limiting factor for helicopter performance? I was also amazed by the shortness of the helicopters' range. With a range between 300 miles and 700 miles and 200mph-ish, that's just over an hour of flight time before needing to refuel.
LE AIRBUS X3 A BATTU LE RECORD DU MONDE, DE VITESSE, EN FAISANT LA COURSE AVEC LE TGV !!! IL A GAGNÉ !!! JC ANONYMOUS PATRIOTE FRANCE. DE GAULLE ET FIER DE L'ÊTRE.
*These majestic scenes make me very impressed and excited, the images and video comments are very good. LIKE a lot, guys*
Helicopter Helicopter. 🚁
Russian Ka!!! helicopter, helicopter!!
@@kxmalahovRussia is our neighbour country but what is a Russian Ka? 😮
Helicopter ( x2 )
@@Leopez02 Ka-50 "Black Shark" Ka-52 "Alligator".
They're all very interesting and impressive helicopters! 😊😊😊😊😊
Realy I like this powerful helicopteres I will like to have this helicopters for protection
The Airbus H155 is the newest EC365 Dolphin. It’s still being produced just under a different name. At 13:29 the helicopter you’re showing most of the time is the EC/Airbus H145.
look like sparrows
They forgot about airwolf😂
Airwolf had several fictional features, such as its supersonic speeds. I guess when you work in Hollywood, anything is possible.
The osprey isn’t a helicopter. Just saying a tilt rotor sure but a helicopter No.
What is the definition of a helicopter that prevents Osprey from being a helicopter?
@@williamromine5715 Helicopters have fixed rotors. A VTOAL dose not. That’s why it has it’s own classification.
@@ChrisN85420 By definition, from the Merriam-Webster dictionary, a helicopter is "an aircraft whose lift is derived from the aerodynamic forces acting on one or more powered rotors turning about substantially vertical axes." While the Osprey's rotors can and often do operate horizontally, they still operate about a "substantially vertical axes" for all landing and take off scenarios. By the strictest sense, I would say that the Osprey is in fact a helicopter, but a specialized type of one. Thoughts?
@@paulswarthout9967 If it was a helicopter you would think it would be classified as one and it definitely isn’t. A VTOAL has it’s own separate category and that’s what gets me to be honest with you. But I agree it’s definitely got helicopter capabilities.
First speed is not a paramount criterium to assess the efficiency of a helicopter and second this type of classification is very subjective. Good video for teenagers, so to speak.
1:53: Regarding the NH90: I've been working on this program for about 10 years and indeed there has been some technical issues but absolutely not related to FBW controls. We even didn't expected them to work so well: no problem at all. The main difficulties were related to the specifications of this H/C taking into account contradictory requirements from the 4 Nations involved in it's development. 4 Nations but ... 8 services (4 Navies, 3 Army Aviations, 1 Air Force)! The main constraints were related to Navy requirements as height and weight in relation with the specifics of the various fregates since basicallyt it was designed as a Navy helicopter to replace the Lynx ans Sea Kings. To make it short this led to an "imperfect" shape inducing some vibratrion issues not easy to fix but nothing to do with FBW.
At last, although Norwegians and Australians have been "annoying customers", to say the least, their termination of the contract has very little to do with the H/C itself:
- Norway got the NH90 in the frame of a "Scandinavian contract" involving Norway, Sweden, Finland and Danemark. Denmark withdrew quite soon from this contract to buy the EH101, if I remember correctly, and among the 3 others, only Norway (the only NATO member by chance...) had "technical problems" ...
- Australia is even worse: they terminated, at the same time, a major submarine contract with France, the NH90 AND the Tiger helicopter under the pressure of their American master for auguing that these helicopters didn't "meet their operational requirements" ... it was time to notice that! Why then did they purchase them following months of negociations and tests? In the case of Australia it's purely and clearly political.
"The NH90 will be a short-lived helicopter": I don't know, it's not obvious and you don't know either.
Be careful with statements about topics you don't master.
13:13: these are Mi24, not Mi28
13:45: this is not an EC155 at all (which is an evolution of the SA365 Dauphin, so to speak). It's an EC135, not the same category
23:41: the V22 is not a helicopter, it's an unclassified thing, something in between with its own advantages and disadvantages, very expensive but neither a helicopter nor an airplane, not as efficient as a helicopter in the H/C flight enveloppe and not as efficient as an airplane when compared to fixed wing aircrafts. It won't probably have any successor. My opinion
The black hawk is called crash hawk by some in the military who are very aware of how many crashes have occurred, killing service personnel.
Never would ride in one again unless my life depended on it
Great video. Still waiting for them to start using metric specs instead of imperial.
The hind does not have a tandem rotor.
😮 The Osprey is very fast but very dangerous.
Rock screwed Cody
The EC-155 shows the 145, too. Dude, you need to do more careful research...
I know right. When in the beginning of the video he said the EC365 dolphin is no longer made. When the EC/H155 is the newest version of the dolphin😆
And what is a "fully glass cockpit"?
A full glass cockpit means it has a full set of screens instead of analog gages.
I think what I found most amazing by this video was that the word "fast" is not really a feature of traditional helicopter design. The difference between the slowest helicopter on this list and the fastest, traditional, helicopter is just a few miles per hour. Could it be that pushing a rotating blade horizontally through the air, is a limiting factor for helicopter performance? I was also amazed by the shortness of the helicopters' range. With a range between 300 miles and 700 miles and 200mph-ish, that's just over an hour of flight time before needing to refuel.
Hind isn't tandem rotor.
It is a brick shit house but.
Great vid guy.
👍
LE AIRBUS X3 A BATTU LE RECORD DU MONDE, DE VITESSE, EN FAISANT LA COURSE AVEC LE TGV !!!
IL A GAGNÉ !!!
JC ANONYMOUS PATRIOTE FRANCE.
DE GAULLE ET FIER DE L'ÊTRE.
Half of those "Havoc" helicopter clips where Hinds. Even a MI 8.
as usual - your list is not true.
on not a single video of yours.
american?
A bit of clickbait I feel..
Russia has been losing a lot of Alligators in Ukraine
why 15? There can be only ONE fastest.
Mil 28 shows 24. Why so avoidable mistakes? That's a thumbs down for you.
STOP using MPH as yhe US mile is noy a standard! Use Knots or KPH