I made the same MISTAKE as you, not that I thought he was brilliant but after watching several hours of his interviews and lectures i was starting to believe in his integrity. Not any more !! Scratch beneath the surface of this man and HE KNOWS the gas chambers were real. He knows the atrocities the Nazis carried out . The reason he defends them is because he is a Neo Nazi himself . He agrees with what Hitler did to everyone of a different race than him. This fella is EVIL pure and simple. Don't be taken in
they don't fear the investigation, just the truth being spread... that is why the control the media.... To quote a famous man: "Think of the press as the great keyboard on which the government can play"...
"The Truth does not fear Investigation." LOL! Don't you just love this one? The (totally incorrect) assertion that the Holocaust is the one and only aspect of history whose memory is protected by denial laws is one of the oldest denier chestnuts. In fact, thousands are. Germany's 'Disparagement Laws', for example, ban denial of _all_ nazi crimes:- Criminal Code, Section 130, Sedition: *"(3) Whoever publicly or in a meeting approves of, denies or downplays **_an act committed under the rule of National Socialism_** [...] incurs a penalty of imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years or a fine."* www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_stgb/englisch_stgb.html#p1241 In the Czech Republic, the Law Against Support and Dissemination of Movements Oppressing Human Rights and Freedoms of 2001 prohibits denial of _all_ nazi and _all_ communist crimes: *"The person who publicly denies, puts in doubt, approves or tries to justify **_Nazi or communist genocide or other crimes of Nazis or communists_** will be punished by prison of 6 months to 3 years."* www.ihgjlm.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Laws-Banning-Holocaust_Denial.pdf If the "Truth Does Not Fear Investigation" brigade possessed one shred of credibility, then they would know this; and if they had one crumb of integrity, then we would see them complaining about all the other events we're banned from denying, belittling or trivialising in equal measure, wouldn't we? Do you see them doing that? Neither do I. Now show us one denier who does not trumpet his or her affirmation of the Holodomor, _which is covered by exactly the same laws in at least three countries,_ the primary sources for which consist of _eyewitness accounts and documents_ (which they do not accept for the Holocaust) from exactly the same 'Judeo-Bolsheviks' they flatly reject as liars on the Holocaust! Does that sound like the behaviour of normal, rational human beings to you? Come off it. The existence of a set of laws is not the reason why people deny the Holocaust - and ONLY the Holocaust; it is just a convenient excuse for them to play the victim card, and one which only holds water as long as they misrepresent the facts. And since they readily accept other events subject to the same censure, deniers look ridiculous when they say only lies need laws to protect them. _The_ truth might not fear investigation, but _theirs_ demonstrably does.
What he explained about travelling and what they done to him in Canada and America is shocking, if he's just a conspiracy nut what the hell are they worried about
Yes, we even used to be taught in and out of school that it was one of the largest wrongs to shut down someone's ability to earn or express themselves due to different beliefs, ideals or faiths. They never added caveats about coming to mainstream bucking conclusions due to exhaustive research to that core Western value, so 👉👌 all the people who have, and continue to, demonize this dude. Yall would've been deported from the western world if held to the same standards you now apply to others
It's been happening since 2007 when G00gle took over YT, you could watch all his & many other people back then before all the *CENS0RSHIP*, and people think we have freedom 😆 we're no different to China
@@christopherp.hitchens3902 Suggesting it's disinformation is just your personal opinion, not proof. Even if it is disinformation, it still falls under the sphere of free speech. Once you start censoring what you think is untrue, we no longer have free speech. You can't cherry pick what you agree with and ban the rest.
What is it that 'those people' - you know who I mean - are so frightened of? If this old Englishman is misguided and talking gibberish what possible threat can he be? Surely if he is wrong about this stuff he is just another nut case - and nobody would waste time on a crazy person - would they? The simple fact that he is being persecuted by the 'authorities' proves that he is telling the truth and - more to the point - is gaining the support of thinking people around the world.
I've read all his books and hesvca good writer an very intelligent. Found some new sources and some of his writings are right on. Unfortunately his worship of Hitler had had him admit parts of quotesctske things out of context to make afolph appear ignorant of events relstingvto genocide. He can do far better his first two books a+ but has become a believer twisting truth so books now sold invfiction. Its a shame could have been on of top 🔝 historians but. Fudge fcts
A fantastic "tell it like it is", he treats the British and other people just the same. I hope everything he ever says is documented, it is important for us and our children
@@NoelRandom you mean the judge that was more interested in what biased “witnesses” thought about the supposed holes in the ceiling of Auschwitz than about the actual ceiling itself?
I am having difficulty In understanding why David Irving was ever called a ‘Holocaust Denier’ He seems to have researched the subject in greater detail than anyone else. His biggest crime was challenging the more excessive claims made by the establishment. Irving’s accounts are even more chilling in my opinion
It sure tells you the sheer magnitude of their fear of being exposed and of people finding out about their long held hidden secrets!! The kind of stuff they never want you finding out!!
Holocaust industry is short of money as the germans stopped reparations payments some years ago. Now, the focus of the jews is on german occupied countries and alleged complicity in extermination . Suprisingly, they make no claim to ukraine. I think the deal has already been done by Zelenski, the askhenazi.
prevent the truth being spread... that is why they control the media.... To quote a famous man: "Think of the press as the great keyboard on which the government can play"...
@@tatyanamelnikoff9578 They do when it comes to those who do not question the news... there are always three sides to a story, yours, mine and were the stories intersect you find what is most likely the truth and all this is based on perception.. EG The news about Hamas.. they claim that Israel attacked them, and the mainstream media pushed the claim... The reality is the opposite, but has the mainstream media done an about face...NO as it doesn't suit the narrative
@Vincent Verona the only real embarrassing flub on David Irving's part was the bit where he didn't know that Xyclon-B was less toxic to lice than to humans, and using it to delouse would likely involve exposing prisoners to far beyond the lethal dose.
you can see why he is so ostracised:- • he is highly intelligent • multi-lingual • a conscientious researcher • merely articulates on the facts & finally... extremely brave... i can see why the majority of people are scared / intimidated by such a man.
@@MrM970 mr irving appears only to be quoting enigma code de-crypts & other direct source intelligence... i don't see how anyone can get so upset with that? apart from maybe the fact that many of the messages fly in the face of the official narrative? mr irving appears to be applying math to coded messages received at bletchley park... is that a problem for you?
@@MrM970 he also stated that the ceo of lehman brothers, richard (dick) fuld... paid himself over HALF A BILLION USD IN BONUSES before single handedly crashing the world economy... his genius was such that he had leveraged lehmans at nearly 40 times... then was left dumbfounded with the news that hank poulson would not bail out the instutution with tax payers money... richard fuld transferred all assets & wealth accumulated to his wife before bankruptcy... one man is rich beyond his wildest dreams...thousands others left destitute... lovely guy.
@@joenbjerregaard7816 he went against a group of people got their own country and 80 years of continued funding. This will be the greatest fraud in history.
Nah. Irving was a great archivist but an appalling historian and extremely racist. Anyone who reads his work objectively knows he deliberately and systematically tortured the records to lie and dissemble. That is why he lost convincingly in court and you should know this.
@@fabioq6916 Trite use of emotive language there. Instead provide an example. There were initially a mere 19 mistakes found in that libel that became whittled down to 7 throughout his entire body of work. I think any historian/archivist under such scrutiny would be overjoyed with that meagre amount.
@Vincent Verona I read the book by Deborah Lipstsdt about the case where Irving sued her for libel and lost spectacularly, a very interesting read, particularly where Irving addressed the judge as 'mein fuhrer'! Of course it wasn't Irving's first experience of losing a libel case. Many years ago Irving was sued by Captain Jack Broome RN about Irving's statements about Broome in his book about Convoy PQ17. Irving lost that one and that edition of the book was withdrawn.
David Irving books are reassuringly high priced, even unsigned paperbacks, which can fetch hundreds, and rarely go for less than £50. When your books are so highly regarded you know you're doing something right.
@Vincent Verona I did the same, I own about 500 physical copies of books on WW2, but probably about the same amount in eBooks, if not more, with 90% of them “acquired” from places online.
He’s very old now. There are speeches he gave from a few years ago and it involves a lot of pauses and stuttering. Comes to us all but in his prime, one of the very best. Just be blessed we managed to record some of his talks and not have to take it in good faith that he was a great speaker/historian.
As a person I see him as an arrogant bigot. And yet he wrote what he found to be the truth. Fought for it. Served time in prison for it and at huge cost to himself financially. Certain political entities had to crush him and he stood firm. I may not like him personally but talk about standing for your principles with conviction.
Its just that those principles and that "truth" is denying the deaths of millions and millions of people. He has been proven to misrepresent/mistranslate documents several times. The example that comes to mind is Hitlers reaction and statements leading up to Kristalnacht, but there are a lot of other examples.
I agree. His lack of charisma doesn't help him but he's a serious historian not worth ignoring. His book Hitler's War is actually pretty good and is incredibly well documented. I think he knew the original sources better than anyone, although I dislike some of his interpretations.
Many authoritive people can sound or even be arrogant. The job makes them that way if it was not an inbred trait. He is also old school. Now we are surrounded by internet motivational speakers and lecturers who want to be liked to get more hits and views.
His meticulous "recital" of his knowledge simply indicates the depth of his study. I am sure everything he speaks is based on the document he read first hand, as you simply cannot make up a story in such a consistent way..
He's full of shit and the way he speaks he gives off certain tells. His eyes and body language betray him every single time. He is mendacious and disingenuous.
@@robertlodde8862 we should wait for your empirically researched evidence to back your claim? Charlatans usually just say stuff that they can’t back with evidence. Maybe you’re the charlatan?
@@robertlodde8862 and YOU know this how? it couldn't possibly be your ideological perspective, right? i mean, obviously you are somehow able to be completely free of preconceived ideas on the subject at hand because you're so moral 🙄
@@MyUserTubeAccount can you give us one credible historian that actually believes David Irving’s “historical perspective” is accurate? Edit: btw I have no doubt David Irving is a knowledgeable historian but his views on Hitler, the Holocaust and other Nazi war crimes is it actually credible?
In my opinion after seeing what they did to the Germans before ww1 and during left the Germans no choice in ww2 Europa the last battle documentary is the real truth of ww2
Let's Pray!... that they do Not Keep him (David) out of America!! They'll LET the Bastard!: George Soros! ... here... in America !!.... and HE... IS .... a dissident!.... who Trys!.... to RUIN !!... OUR Way of American .... Life !!!!!!!!!!!
My mother was an Austrian orphan raised in Germany during WW2 in the town of Floss. He whole life she had awful guilt about being Austrian-German and what happened during the war. She was born in February 1927. She would have loved RUclips. she could have watched videos of Franzl Lang, her favorite yodeler. Franzl died in December 2015, my mom passed in June 2006. I miss my mom, she was a great women!
@@marcusaurelius394 yes but Smigley was responsible for negotiations with Hitler over the future of Danzig and East Prussia. He was being told not to do any business with Germany. He should've told all these people to go to hell but he didn't...
David has always said he writes what he finds in the archives so no matter if it's good or bad for him he still does it & that's why he's a *real historian* he could of easily taken the easy road & made millions regurgitating *"Their"* narrative
I lived in Panama City Beach over 20 years ago and tourists were always complaining about getting ripped off in the Israeli/Jewish owned shops. At the time the local police were trying to crackdown on these practices and there was even an article in the local paper. I wonder if anything has changed.
This isn't speculation. I worked at a shop on the strip and talked to many, many tourists who were ripped off. There was an article in the Panama City News Herald about it... A Pulitzer Prize winning Newspaper btw. It was not an occasional occurrence, it was a regular pattern or practice. Not every Jewish person is responsible for the actions of a few but there was a systematic practice among Israeli owned shops. So stop your whining.
+Terry Allan boy I can knock out your teeth with one left hook so watch your words. just another lady boy prentebding to. be tough is killed in ear and grew up in black neighborhood gold gloves srmy pro then club boxer. you near Florida back up your words mr milqetoast
so if they get ripped off and they keep getting ripped off question ❔.their sanity. obama's ripping me off with the taxes I lost but didn't or would never vote for him or hitlery
+Michael Williams we'll. Am. 60 still box and neck k 435 I'm 510 210 and gave never been called fat before. A's a former. Army then pro for a while and at 60 -could still kick your ass. Have 4 pack my old 6 pack refrifgd.. Think more husky.. Let me know what kind of shape your in at 60, If I'm.still. around did give me a food laugh. Have good DR slim didn't know guys looking me over kick your
Thank you for posting, I’ve always been a huge fan of different views, I’d rather live in a world with different ideas and views, than in a world where we are forced to believe one narrative. I’m a huge fan of Mr.Irving.
He is the best and worth every penny to listen ..for German guys he is a gift as he is able to research German archives and speak to germans while translating all of this into his mother tongue English
@Scimmia No, but Irving's own writings proof beyond a doubt he's a lying POS. Maybe you could explain why it is, every time he comes to a false conclusion, it's always favouring Hitler? A real historian makes mistakes, but in that case they don't favour one side exclusively. Now, you can play your silly word games from here to this day month, but unless you can proof the original verdict wrong, your words mean diddly.
@@Warriorking.1963 He came to have National Socialist sympathies in his early years after working and living in post war Germany. He clearly has far right pro-fascist sympathies. He can twist facts, sometimes by taking things out of context.... and in that respect he has many similarities to pro-Allied historians, who do the same. Nevertheless, not all Irving argues and claims can be dismissed, not least his criticisms of Winston Churchill and allied war crimes. The Second World War is currently the most abused aspect of history.... by many sides... and most accounts are neither neutral nor well balanced, including that of David Irving. It is a pity David Irving did not have the discipline to stick to facts without taking things out of context, in order to put Hitler into a more positive light than he deserves. Nevertheless, he does have some quite solid critique of the Allies, which are hard to fairly disprove....
What are they hiding? Your not allowed to challenge the official narrative? I think that says it all seems like 1984 to me. We are lucky to have this man and I admire his courage they have tried to destroy his life but he hasn’t backed down!
@@anthonygibbons8572 - Yes, only YOU have the truth because you’re special. No one else is as clever as you are! You follow men who have simple solutions for complex problems!
Do you know how many learned men, and I mean 99.999999999% of historians who’ve written as many books as Irving, think Irving is deplorable? Have you ever heard of “confirmation bias”? Irving sees what he wants to - even if it means ignoring the stories of thousands of survivors from Auschwitz, some of whom had the unenviable task of collecting bodies after they were gassed, shaving their hair, removing their fillings, then wheeling their bodies to be incinerated. Get a grip.
This from the London judgment: "Irving has for his own ideological reasons persistently and deliberately misrepresented and manipulated historical evidence; that for the same reasons he has portrayed Hitler in an unwarrantedly favourable light, principally in relation to his attitude towards and responsibility for the treatment of the Jews; that he is an active Holocaust denier; that he is anti-Semitic and racist, and that he associates with right-wing extremists who promote neo-Nazism...]therefore the defence of justification succeeds... It follows that there must be judgment for the Defendants."
What is the latest information on David Irving?? Is he still speaking??
9 лет назад+37
This poor historian has been gang stalked by the criminal Khazar cult. David had a fair trial like Corrie, a 98 lb little girl with a loud speaker, in front of a baby killer Khazar invader, driving a bulldozer. " "Ruby is alive, Oy vaaboy if we get caught!" Golda Meir Anyone for whiff of white phosphorus? Oh yeah, you can trust the Khazars to play fair especially when it comes to law. Just ask the plagiarist Alan Dershowitz.
+Larry Jackson Sad how you poor propagandists obsess over sex and depravity. It's a condition you people should really work to resolve. Perhaps you should go have some kids and then bugger off?
I have several oh David’s books and he is wonderful. WWII is a very important part of world history and David Irving is the best historian on the subject. I hate being lied to and I trust Irving and his information.
He has written about WW2 according to him, mostly lies and made up crap to make Hitler look better than he was. A lyiong anti Semite and Holocaust denier.
From the London libel judgment: "Irving has for his own ideological reasons persistently and deliberately misrepresented and manipulated historical evidence; that for the same reasons he has portrayed Hitler in an unwarrantedly favourable light, principally in relation to his attitude towards and responsibility for the treatment of the Jews; that he is an active Holocaust denier; that he is anti-Semitic and racist, and that he associates with right-wing extremists who promote neo-Nazism... therefore the defence of justification succeeds...It follows that there must be judgment for the Defendants."
From the London judgment: "Irving has for his own ideological reasons persistently and deliberately misrepresented and manipulated historical evidence; that for the same reasons he has portrayed Hitler in an unwarrantedly favourable light, principally in relation to his attitude towards and responsibility for the treatment of the Jews; that he is an active Holocaust denier; that he is anti-Semitic and racist, and that he associates with right-wing extremists who promote neo-Nazism...therefore the defence of justification succeeds... It follows that there must be judgment for the Defendants."
9 лет назад+10
Very interesting indeed......apart from that maddening fucking idiot wandering around behind David Irving. Couldn't he just sit down?
This event needs to be applaud for those that have letting him speak and those that listend, the few in my mind last believers in that is know as freedom of speech!
I have read all of Mr. Irving's books. I have met and talked to Mr. Irving personally with fellow historians over coffee in Krakow. A fascinating historian. A incredibly brittle and unpleasant person.
@@allisnotwhatitseems. I respect his scholarly achievements , especially the research of Hitler's personal physician . I do not respect his dismissive and bloviating pomposity. From my observations, David Irving's affections for Herr Himmler border on the obcene.
More pompous than any other historian like the clowns in Egypt that control the narrative? Or the swine who controlled information during covid, who were impossible to question
While I don’t agree with many things he says I do believe in his right to speak. At least he tries to back up his theories with actual research. Most people just talk what comes to mind with no analysis.
The more I hear of David Irving's life experiences, the more I am convinced he is telling the truth in his books and speeches. Only the Truth gets this much resistance.
Priceless. This is the most real, honest, legitimate historical research that can possibly be done. It should be embraced, as it is appropriate for all educated people, academics, and students to question what was written and concluded before. I could listen to this man for hours and hours with never being bored.
Thank you for your assessment but unfortunately you saying it is the “most real, honest, legitimate historical research” doesn’t mean his research and conclusions are any of the sort. He is a politically motivated liar
As history shows when tyrants come to power the first order of. Business is to take away firearms the second is to silence churches ,historians and intellectuals.
David Irving in my opinion is one of the greatest historians of all time. The powers at be will do everything to stop mr Irving from tell the truth about the Holocaust!! The man is 85 years old thank god we have the many books he has written.
The British invented everything in WW2, we are very clever people the British. Whether you agree with this man, he is highly intelligent. That is abosulute fact
It’s because he denies the 6 million figure, if you still think bad things happened but question the official number, you’re still classified as a “holocaust denier”
Mr. David Irving is not infatuated with Hitler to the extent that he loves the man. He simply understands that every leader, whether it's Churchill, Hitler or Roosevelt, is/was at heart a ruthless person in their pursuits. The difference between the leaders is minor at best. He also understands that with every type government, enforcement is ultimately the end of a gun barrel.
The difference between Roosevelt and Hitler is minor? Very nice equivocation. Irving tried his hardest to portray Hitler as positive as possible as many historians have criticized him for ,among the many criticisms.
@@vhufeosqap Yes, minor when you consider his domestic policies and his perfidy in getting the Japanese to attack Pearl while playing ignorant of the plans.
Apart from all the brilliant historical stuff I love his personal bits. 6 months visa analysis. I guess in the small print it is clearly set out but come on. On 40 minutes the two people 'dining'....'have they ordered yet ?' Brilliant.
David Irving is a very real and powerful historian who doesn't just go with the popular narrative to play it safe. He gets to the deep levels of what really went down in a key time that reverberates through our lives now.
This gentleman is a wealth of knowledge. I wish he was my history teacher in school. People are stupid to think he’s anti Semitic, not true at all. First of all, history is written by the winners. Mr. Irving is a great researcher of the facts, he’d make a great detective. He just writes the facts. Had Germany won WW2, Mr. Irving would be banned in Germany because he would write all the facts on how the war was won, and some of those facts would be embarrassing for Germany. He does not deviate from the facts. He doesn’t play favorites. His book on Hitler’s war should be required reading for any historian. He is a proud Englishman who thinks Churchill bankrupted England during WW2. As an American, I respect Mr. Irving. I know he doesn’t think too highly of Americans mainly because of the way he was harassed while lecturing in the states. Most Americans respect and admire this gentleman. I feel bad that he has to go through all this crap with immigration just to give his in-person lectures in the states. For God sakes, this gentleman is harmless and is just a great historian and he’s no harm to anyone. Christ, most Americans aren’t even interested in history and couldn’t care less about it. He lectures for the students of history and political junkies. The only thing about him that’s alarming to a few people is Mr. Irving simply tells the facts to history. And to some people, they find the facts a little embarrassing. Let him alone, there’s only 20 or so people that are interested in his talks when he lectures in a city. It shows you how illiterate and dumbed-down we’ve become when it takes more energy to stop him from coming than it does to the actual people interested in listening to his talks.
@@nightowl5475 The entire book is full of deliberately mistranslated sources to portray the Nazi regime in a more favourite light and to support Irving's arguments and points. Irving deliberately lied about what sources said. He puts out wild claims unsupported by evidence and draws massive conclusions from one piece of evidence such as claiming that because one sentence in Himmler's diary said one specific group of Jews that were transported from Latvia should not be executed that Hitler in fact ordered the no Jews ever were to be exterminated. He later accepted he was completely wrong on this. He done that while simultaneously claiming that because he couldn't find one document from Hitler explicitly stating that we should kill the Jews that we can ignore all the other people around Hitler saying that there was. He has one standard for Nazi's and another standard for everyone else.
@@jplb96 Well everyone knows Hitler didn't like the jews. I don't see how anyone could question that. I mean, come on, look what the nazi's did. You mean to tell me they didn't get approval to do that? Of course Hitler approved the killing of the Jews. That's crazy to even try to sell.
@@jplb96 What I found interesting was about what this gentleman wrote about Himler. Check out the story he said on You Tube. He said, Himler didn't commit suicide. The Brits beat the crap outta him. On Himler's death mask, his face was all bruised up and beaten. Which he deserved of course. But what Irving was saying was, Himler was beaten to death by the Brits. What do you think of that story? Those Brits had a hard-on to get to that little bastard. Maybe they went over-board and beat the tar outta him. No one would complain but is Irving on to something? I mean, as bad as the nazi were, we all want the truth. Was Himler beaten to death by British intelligence??
That part where he said that only a tin can and a piece of barbed wire was ever found at Sobibor really staggered me. I mean we're talking about a quarter of million people that would have been killed there, and none of them dropped a piece of jewelry, a coin or lost a button while waking that final stretch to the undressing rooms? And none from the mounts of clothing and personal items that the victims left ever dropped to the ground while being moved. Not to speak of the SS guards and executioners, the Ukrainians and the "Sonderkommando" that lived there permanently, must have been several hundred or thousands of people. They all must have eaten, the SS men at least drank frequently, and supposedly had orgies, and they never left any rubbish, the way all human habitation does? Or is the suggestion that the Germans bulldozed the entire top-layer of earth away too? I also think the suggestion that the methods of execution, ways of disposing of the bodies, and site of the graves etc. are trivial questions, is absurd. One of the largest massacres in word history, and a unique one in the way it was carried out, and the methods are an irrelevancy? If anything, whether or not Hitler knew, or how much he knew is the trivial question, although I understand that he's coming from a very particular point of view.
please and you actually believevthst read some books by more crediblevhidtoriansvIe kersshawv fest bullock none are jewv2 englishvine gernnman you might learn dimthing
Grow up at least what little brain power 💪 you have go to Germany you'll see all original records you deniers are either stupid by more likely jew hstrers, spreading propaganda to the ones even dumber than you
Such a shame the camera work and production were so poor in this video. And the bastard wandering around in the background is just distracting. Didn't the camera man or director notice. Otherwise the content is very interesting.
+Andrew Erntell "And the bastard wandering around in the background is just distracting." Actually, Andrew, I think you'll find - if you check the other RUclips version of this - that the guy was keeping an eye out (through the door pane behind David) for the usual Rent-a-Mob troublemakers: they ALWAYS seem to turn up at these events - just to spoil things for everyone...................... Yep - it IS a little annoying - but necessary, I fear.
+Andrew Erntell that's ungrateful of you. Why should you have any opportunity to hear him speak, since the recorders are the ones who paid for the event.
The word on the street is that guarding the pits was a tough job. The pits would move. Up and down.. sometimes a zombie would crawl out of the pits and you had to deal with it quickly before it escaped
A lot of the questions that were posted to David were a bit sophomoric and demonstrated that they were not listening to him during his presentation and the Q&A, or didn't understand him.
May I ask what conclusion are you drawing from that? In the last months of WW2 he did actually serve as commander of the "replacement army" on the Vistula (and made a total cock-up of it!)
Yes a most entertaining and instructive hour. The notion of the Holocaust as an iron curtain coming down at half time in a theatre - to quell discussion - is memorable.
I remember being drawn into youtube by this man. I became, not a Holocaust denier, but a Holocaust doubter, as in doubting the way id been taught what had happened. No shame in questioning authority given how we've been lied to about so much. If it makes sense...then perhaps we should listen. Please that we're allowed to decide for ourselves. Please that we're allowed more then one sourse of info, of news. I say please as if im speaking to a benevolent universe, not an authoritative master. Masters don't generally listen to pleas.
This guy is brilliant. He's been paying a heavy price for arranging letters in a row on paper.
You think that's brilliant?
I made the same MISTAKE as you, not that I thought he was brilliant but after watching several hours of his interviews and lectures i was starting to believe in his integrity. Not any more !! Scratch beneath the surface of this man and HE KNOWS the gas chambers were real. He knows the atrocities the Nazis carried out . The reason he defends them is because he is a Neo Nazi himself . He agrees with what Hitler did to everyone of a different race than him. This fella is EVIL pure and simple. Don't be taken in
\He is a champion but don't tell anyone
Need I repeat ?. The truth does not fear investigation.
they don't fear the investigation, just the truth being spread... that is why the control the media.... To quote a famous man: "Think of the press as the great keyboard on which the government can play"...
on another level: "The further a society moves from truth, the more it will hate those who speak it" Orwell.
"The Truth does not fear Investigation." LOL! Don't you just love this one? The (totally incorrect) assertion that the Holocaust is the one and only aspect of history whose memory is protected by denial laws is one of the oldest denier chestnuts. In fact, thousands are. Germany's 'Disparagement Laws', for example, ban denial of _all_ nazi crimes:-
Criminal Code, Section 130, Sedition: *"(3) Whoever publicly or in a meeting approves of, denies or downplays **_an act committed under the rule of National Socialism_** [...] incurs a penalty of imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years or a fine."*
www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_stgb/englisch_stgb.html#p1241
In the Czech Republic, the Law Against Support and Dissemination of Movements Oppressing Human Rights and Freedoms of 2001 prohibits denial of _all_ nazi and _all_ communist crimes: *"The person who publicly denies, puts in doubt, approves or tries to justify **_Nazi or communist genocide or other crimes of Nazis or communists_** will be punished by prison of 6 months to 3 years."*
www.ihgjlm.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Laws-Banning-Holocaust_Denial.pdf
If the "Truth Does Not Fear Investigation" brigade possessed one shred of credibility, then they would know this; and if they had one crumb of integrity, then we would see them complaining about all the other events we're banned from denying, belittling or trivialising in equal measure, wouldn't we? Do you see them doing that? Neither do I. Now show us one denier who does not trumpet his or her affirmation of the Holodomor, _which is covered by exactly the same laws in at least three countries,_ the primary sources for which consist of _eyewitness accounts and documents_ (which they do not accept for the Holocaust) from exactly the same 'Judeo-Bolsheviks' they flatly reject as liars on the Holocaust! Does that sound like the behaviour of normal, rational human beings to you?
Come off it. The existence of a set of laws is not the reason why people deny the Holocaust - and ONLY the Holocaust; it is just a convenient excuse for them to play the victim card, and one which only holds water as long as they misrepresent the facts. And since they readily accept other events subject to the same censure, deniers look ridiculous when they say only lies need laws to protect them. _The_ truth might not fear investigation, but _theirs_ demonstrably does.
What he explained about travelling and what they done to him in Canada and America is shocking, if he's just a conspiracy nut what the hell are they worried about
Humanforfreedom 95 I agree
Exactly. They fear his knowledge getting out to the masses.
Liars are petrified of any truth tellers!
Who wants this type of c**t in their country besides other hate scum?
Yes, we even used to be taught in and out of school that it was one of the largest wrongs to shut down someone's ability to earn or express themselves due to different beliefs, ideals or faiths. They never added caveats about coming to mainstream bucking conclusions due to exhaustive research to that core Western value, so 👉👌 all the people who have, and continue to, demonize this dude. Yall would've been deported from the western world if held to the same standards you now apply to others
Brilliant mind, extremely well spoken, accesible, brutally honest. Enemy of the international clique.
It seems many David Irving videos are being removed from RUclips.
It's been happening since 2007 when G00gle took over YT, you could watch all his & many other people back then before all the *CENS0RSHIP*, and people think we have freedom 😆 we're no different to China
Political Leftie Correctness as usual.
Much like Trump, Irving is in the business of disinformation. Not the same thing as free speech.
@@christopherp.hitchens3902 Suggesting it's disinformation is just your personal opinion, not proof. Even if it is disinformation, it still falls under the sphere of free speech. Once you start censoring what you think is untrue, we no longer have free speech. You can't cherry pick what you agree with and ban the rest.
@@asensibleyoungman2978 Dont bother hes clearly a CCP bot spamming anti Trump bs in every comment.
The truth is always to be paid higher prices, most of the people are not willing to pay that price.
He does it the right way with evidence
How does this man remember so many details? What a gifted mind, and a brave soul. God bless him.
What is it that 'those people' - you know who I mean - are so frightened of? If this old Englishman is misguided and talking gibberish what possible threat can he be? Surely if he is wrong about this stuff he is just another nut case - and nobody would waste time on a crazy person - would they?
The simple fact that he is being persecuted by the 'authorities' proves that he is telling the truth and - more to the point - is gaining the support of thinking people around the world.
he made hi 👋 own bed
he can talk but books are now in fiction
+Larry Jackson Do you also believe in Book Burning?
I've read all his books and hesvca good writer an very intelligent. Found some new sources and some of his writings are right on. Unfortunately his worship of Hitler had had him admit parts of quotesctske things out of context to make afolph appear ignorant of events relstingvto genocide. He can do far better his first two books a+ but has become a believer twisting truth so books now sold invfiction. Its a shame could have been on of top 🔝 historians but. Fudge fcts
No where would you get a stupid idea 💡 like that. Free to read anything you wantvsvdn if vile. Is actions that count not thoughts
A fantastic "tell it like it is", he treats the British and other people just the same. I hope everything he ever says is documented, it is important for us and our children
One of the best WW2 historians of the world
Hilarious.
the judge disagrees
@@NoelRandomthe Judiciary are so independent
Not one of the best but the best
@@NoelRandom you mean the judge that was more interested in what biased “witnesses” thought about the supposed holes in the ceiling of Auschwitz than about the actual ceiling itself?
I am having difficulty In understanding why David Irving was ever called a ‘Holocaust Denier’ He seems to have researched the subject in greater detail than anyone else.
His biggest crime was challenging the more excessive claims made by the establishment.
Irving’s accounts are even more chilling in my opinion
It sure tells you the sheer magnitude of their fear of being exposed and of people finding out about their long held hidden secrets!! The kind of stuff they never want you finding out!!
@@koko2bware their, they, blah blah blah
Speak clearly, don’t be a coward
@@vhufeosqap Since you can't accept other people suffered genocide too, people can see you are the coward here!!
Holocaust industry is short of money as the germans stopped reparations payments some years ago. Now, the focus of the jews is on german occupied countries and alleged complicity in extermination . Suprisingly, they make no claim to ukraine. I think the deal has already been done by Zelenski, the askhenazi.
It is a label they put on anyone they fear and dislike. Then they can begin to destroy them.
-Voltaire :"... It's easy to tell who is REALLY in charge,...it's the one your not allowed to talk about".
who's stopping you nd your cohorts from speaking answer nobody's stop bullshit
prevent the truth being spread... that is why they control the media.... To quote a famous man: "Think of the press as the great keyboard on which the government can play"...
@@larryjackson8406 really? why is there so much rampant censorship?
@@johnstewart3846 they don't control anyone's mind.
@@tatyanamelnikoff9578 They do when it comes to those who do not question the news... there are always three sides to a story, yours, mine and were the stories intersect you find what is most likely the truth and all this is based on perception.. EG The news about Hamas.. they claim that Israel attacked them, and the mainstream media pushed the claim... The reality is the opposite, but has the mainstream media done an about face...NO as it doesn't suit the narrative
Great speaker, brilliant man.
His talks are slowly disappearing from YT.
Probably because they're becoming less relevant on YT.
Have you tried bitshute. Lots there, give me a shout if you want a link
Joo tube
@Eyad Mas www.bitchute.com/video/2GNf2jV8Jkgv/
M.Herbert
don't worry, just go to
www.altcensored.com/search/page/2?q=david%20irving
nearly all of RUclips's deleted videos are there.
:)
This great historian is in a class of his own,... no comparisons!
I can see a lot of people to compare him to, all of whom write fiction.
@@oldesertguy9616 I bet you haven't read any of his books or had an original thought in your life. mr compliant
@@lucasomar5184 Mr. Irving's thoughts are certainly original. I mean, since he makes them up as he goes along.
@Vincent Verona the only real embarrassing flub on David Irving's part was the bit where he didn't know that Xyclon-B was less toxic to lice than to humans, and using it to delouse would likely involve exposing prisoners to far beyond the lethal dose.
@vincentverona7773 You're are gravely mistaken!!
you can see why he is so ostracised:-
• he is highly intelligent
• multi-lingual
• a conscientious researcher
• merely articulates on the facts
& finally... extremely brave...
i can see why the majority of people are scared / intimidated by such a man.
@joebidenistrash i hear you... everyone is entitled to an opinion... without being locked up in solitary confinement for 18months?
You missed one... simply wrong
@@MrM970 we are all entitled to our opinion sir... that is ok isn't it? i mean... should i lock you up for 18months because our views differ?
@@MrM970 mr irving appears only to be quoting enigma code de-crypts & other direct source intelligence...
i don't see how anyone can get so upset with that? apart from maybe the fact that many of the messages fly in the face of the official narrative?
mr irving appears to be applying math to coded messages received at bletchley park...
is that a problem for you?
@@MrM970 he also stated that the ceo of lehman brothers, richard (dick) fuld... paid himself over HALF A BILLION USD IN BONUSES before single handedly crashing the world economy...
his genius was such that he had leveraged lehmans at nearly 40 times... then was left dumbfounded with the news that hank poulson would not bail out the instutution with tax payers money...
richard fuld transferred all assets & wealth accumulated to his wife before bankruptcy...
one man is rich beyond his wildest dreams...thousands others left destitute...
lovely guy.
I can listen to him again and again. So interesting and gripping
Manjot Kalh
Based Indian beauty!
@Pep Me? Hell nah, I would never betray Huwite Women. It was merely a compliment.
Just don’t get to carried away ..
"We take cash, checks, cards and promises to pay".
XD
Much respect, Mr.Irving. A great man, I always hoped to meet him some day...
You can see via his face he has been through so much pain. Poor guy. Im sure there is a good place waiting for him in heaven.
The Oak and the Reed. He went up against certain aspects of foundational myths of the modern world and paid dearly.
@Kels S. shut up you dumbfuck. We are small pathetic people compared to men like Irving.
@@joenbjerregaard7816 he went against a group of people got their own country and 80 years of continued funding. This will be the greatest fraud in history.
@@mightyea true
He also used to be a much more lively and jovial public speaker. It takes true evil to ruin a man for simply pursuing truth
Irving and Assange, both purveyors of truth and both paying the price.
Nah. Irving was a great archivist but an appalling historian and extremely racist. Anyone who reads his work objectively knows he deliberately and systematically tortured the records to lie and dissemble. That is why he lost convincingly in court and you should know this.
@@fabioq6916 Trite use of emotive language there. Instead provide an example. There were initially a mere 19 mistakes found in that libel that became whittled down to 7 throughout his entire body of work. I think any historian/archivist under such scrutiny would be overjoyed with that meagre amount.
@@fabioq6916 wrong about irving. give one example of irving deliberately lying or being racist
@@fabioq6916
“Appalling” “extremely” “racist”
Name something.
Assange does not compare to Irving. Irving was not a rebel, he was just a normal man finding the truth for us all to read.
David Irving, a brave man just giving the truth.
@J C In his own estimation.
@Vincent Verona I read the book by Deborah Lipstsdt about the case where Irving sued her for libel and lost spectacularly, a very interesting read, particularly where Irving addressed the judge as 'mein fuhrer'! Of course it wasn't Irving's first experience of losing a libel case. Many years ago Irving was sued by Captain Jack Broome RN about Irving's statements about Broome in his book about Convoy PQ17. Irving lost that one and that edition of the book was withdrawn.
That truth being what exactly?
David Irving books are reassuringly high priced, even unsigned paperbacks, which can fetch hundreds, and rarely go for less than £50. When your books are so highly regarded you know you're doing something right.
@Vincent Verona That sounds good Vincent. Is it relatively straight forward?
@Vincent Verona I did the same, I own about 500 physical copies of books on WW2, but probably about the same amount in eBooks, if not more, with 90% of them “acquired” from places online.
@@RifleEyez are they authentic? Isn't there a risk of edits?
That’s not the reason his books are so expensive
@@djharto4917 I suggest only buying from his publisher. It's $50 vs $150++ on Ebay.
This man would be unstoppable if someone like JRE had the courage to let him speak
He’s very old now. There are speeches he gave from a few years ago and it involves a lot of pauses and stuttering. Comes to us all but in his prime, one of the very best. Just be blessed we managed to record some of his talks and not have to take it in good faith that he was a great speaker/historian.
As a person I see him as an arrogant bigot. And yet he wrote what he found to be the truth. Fought for it. Served time in prison for it and at huge cost to himself financially. Certain political entities had to crush him and he stood firm. I may not like him personally but talk about standing for your principles with conviction.
Its just that those principles and that "truth" is denying the deaths of millions and millions of people. He has been proven to misrepresent/mistranslate documents several times. The example that comes to mind is Hitlers reaction and statements leading up to Kristalnacht, but there are a lot of other examples.
I agree. His lack of charisma doesn't help him but he's a serious historian not worth ignoring. His book Hitler's War is actually pretty good and is incredibly well documented. I think he knew the original sources better than anyone, although I dislike some of his interpretations.
And you’re a simp.
Many authoritive people can sound or even be arrogant. The job makes them that way if it was not an inbred trait. He is also old school. Now we are surrounded by internet motivational speakers and lecturers who want to be liked to get more hits and views.
What is arrogant about him? Any well educated person with a load of facts seems arrogant to the unlearned.
His meticulous "recital" of his knowledge simply indicates the depth of his study. I am sure everything he speaks is based on the document he read first hand, as you simply cannot make up a story in such a consistent way..
He's full of shit and the way he speaks he gives off certain tells. His eyes and body language betray him every single time. He is mendacious and disingenuous.
Nonsense. His recital is from an ideological perspective, and memorizing some facts. He is not a historian, but a charlatan.
@@robertlodde8862 we should wait for your empirically researched evidence to back your claim? Charlatans usually just say stuff that they can’t back with evidence. Maybe you’re the charlatan?
@@robertlodde8862 and YOU know this how? it couldn't possibly be your ideological perspective, right? i mean, obviously you are somehow able to be completely free of preconceived ideas on the subject at hand because you're so moral 🙄
@@MyUserTubeAccount can you give us one credible historian that actually believes David Irving’s “historical perspective” is accurate?
Edit: btw I have no doubt David Irving is a knowledgeable historian but his views on Hitler, the Holocaust and other Nazi war crimes is it actually credible?
In my opinion after seeing what they did to the Germans before ww1 and during left the Germans no choice in ww2 Europa the last battle documentary is the real truth of ww2
Thank you for the truth sir
What a brilliant man and wanting to see truth prevail.
It's magical to listen to this unique, priceless man. I'd love to go and hear him speak one day.
Let's Pray!... that they do Not Keep him (David) out of America!! They'll LET the Bastard!: George Soros! ... here... in America !!.... and HE... IS .... a dissident!.... who Trys!.... to RUIN !!... OUR Way of American .... Life !!!!!!!!!!!
+captmitty To whom is your comment addressed?
captmitty yo! horses ass !!!!! doofus !!
He would make a very interesting Dinner Guest, Will they ever say "This is Your Life" to Him? lol.
book your seat in hell
My mother was an Austrian orphan raised in Germany during WW2 in the town of Floss. He whole life she had awful guilt about being Austrian-German and what happened during the war. She was born in February 1927. She would have loved RUclips. she could have watched videos of Franzl Lang, her favorite yodeler. Franzl died in December 2015, my mom passed in June 2006. I miss my mom, she was a great women!
May she rest in peace.
Sadly how best of people were made to feel guilty of who they are.
@@marcusaurelius394 I blame Polish Marshall Edward Rydz-Smigley for provoking Germany from July 1939 to Sept.
@@Smudgeroon74 I blame same guys Kanye blames and if you look deeper into incidents you mention you will find them there too.
@@marcusaurelius394 yes but Smigley was responsible for negotiations with Hitler over the future of Danzig and East Prussia. He was being told not to do any business with Germany. He should've told all these people to go to hell but he didn't...
this guy knows the truth.
if he does sure don't tell it he knows better that's the pity tread first edition of hitless war vs current one see historian vs fan club member
get a life you pathetic berk
+Larry Jackson you are a wordsmith
@@airborne2767 the modern day Shakespeare
Wise words Larry
David has always said he writes what he finds in the archives so no matter if it's good or bad for him he still does it & that's why he's a *real historian* he could of easily taken the easy road & made millions regurgitating *"Their"* narrative
Yes. Same observations
A fascist thug and a fake historian
Agreed! David is the best historian.
He did make millions, denying the Holocaust and idolizing Hitler. He found his audience among white supremacist skinheads and dupes.
Who's " their"
Great work by David Irving
i wish I could have fucked adolph by David Irving jewish name
probably 70 % accurate rest slvantes so hitler was. clueless to atrocities in poland.
+Terry Allan you would know but in this case never could stomach yhe idea 💡 of it
What are you obseesesdvwith me found a hobby and get lost
Stewart Granger,id gladly pay ,the guy is the best on the third reich and the ww2,there isnt a historian with the contact and first hand contact
I lived in Panama City Beach over 20 years ago and tourists were always complaining about getting ripped off in the Israeli/Jewish owned shops. At the time the local police were trying to crackdown on these practices and there was even an article in the local paper. I wonder if anything has changed.
I'm sure and all the christian ones were honest. you ask a price nobody forces you to buy oroduct
This isn't speculation. I worked at a shop on the strip and talked to many, many tourists who were ripped off.
There was an article in the Panama City News Herald about it... A Pulitzer Prize winning Newspaper btw. It was not an occasional occurrence, it was a regular pattern or practice. Not every Jewish person is responsible for the actions of a few but there was a systematic practice among Israeli owned shops. So stop your whining.
+Terry Allan boy I can knock out your teeth with one left hook so watch your words. just another lady boy prentebding to. be tough is killed in ear and grew up in black neighborhood gold gloves srmy pro then club boxer. you near Florida back up your words mr milqetoast
so if they get ripped off and they keep getting ripped off question ❔.their sanity. obama's ripping me off with the taxes I lost but didn't or would never vote for him or hitlery
+Terry Allan poodle boy
It scares me that he's getting older. When he passes away eventually, I'll cry so much, it'll be like I'll be alone in the search for truth then.
+Breathingspace pussy
poor nazi boy
+Michael Williams we'll. Am. 60 still box and neck k 435 I'm 510 210 and gave never been called fat before. A's a former. Army then pro for a while and at 60 -could still kick your ass. Have 4 pack my old 6 pack refrifgd.. Think more husky.. Let me know what kind of shape your in at 60, If I'm.still. around did give me a food laugh.
Have good DR slim didn't know guys looking me over
kick your
Poor baby
Michael Williams and if I ever meet you ill gut you like a fish noodle brain
I’d love to attend one of David’s tours. Fascinating.
You will find yourself in the sinister company of holocaust deniers and such - but if that is your crowd, hey?
Thank you for posting, I’ve always been a huge fan of different views, I’d rather live in a world with different ideas and views, than in a world where we are forced to believe one narrative. I’m a huge fan of Mr.Irving.
He is the best and worth every penny to listen ..for German guys he is a gift as he is able to research German archives and speak to germans while translating all of this into his mother tongue English
Is mother tongue is Shit!
Yeah... pity he has a nasty tendency to... "make mistakes" when translating.
A discredited liar, not worth the paper wasted to print his books.
@Scimmia Oh no... he was actually declared a liar in a court case that he himself initiated.
@Scimmia No, but Irving's own writings proof beyond a doubt he's a lying POS. Maybe you could explain why it is, every time he comes to a false conclusion, it's always favouring Hitler? A real historian makes mistakes, but in that case they don't favour one side exclusively.
Now, you can play your silly word games from here to this day month, but unless you can proof the original verdict wrong, your words mean diddly.
@@Warriorking.1963 He came to have National Socialist sympathies in his early years after working and living in post war Germany. He clearly has far right pro-fascist sympathies. He can twist facts, sometimes by taking things out of context.... and in that respect he has many similarities to pro-Allied historians, who do the same. Nevertheless, not all Irving argues and claims can be dismissed, not least his criticisms of Winston Churchill and allied war crimes. The Second World War is currently the most abused aspect of history.... by many sides... and most accounts are neither neutral nor well balanced, including that of David Irving. It is a pity David Irving did not have the discipline to stick to facts without taking things out of context, in order to put Hitler into a more positive light than he deserves. Nevertheless, he does have some quite solid critique of the Allies, which are hard to fairly disprove....
What are they hiding? Your not allowed to challenge the official narrative? I think that says it all seems like 1984 to me. We are lucky to have this man and I admire his courage they have tried to destroy his life but he hasn’t backed down!
Randy Scott reparations. Zionist collected a lot of money by Germany for the holocaust.
"The further a society moves from truth, the more it will hate those who speak it" Orwell.
David Irving is one of the definitions of cojones
Here's a guy who takes the time to analyze true history and the world demonizes him for it
Yeah "youtube historians" would rather take the word of the NKVD files in Moscow...lmao
@@gutzzgutzz6795 - Much like Trump, Irving is in the business of disinformation. Not the same thing as free speech.
@@christopherp.hitchens3902 Like Bidens i will cure cancer if elected and send out 2k checks my first day in office? Get outta here clown.
@@christopherp.hitchens3902 just keep reading the mainstream papers, you'll stay nice and dumbed-down.
@@anthonygibbons8572 - Yes, only YOU have the truth because you’re special. No one else is as clever as you are! You follow men who have simple solutions for complex problems!
David Irving the epitome of the Ultimate Truth...
Can never fool a learned Man
Absolute Legend
Do you know how many learned men, and I mean 99.999999999% of historians who’ve written as many books as Irving, think Irving is deplorable?
Have you ever heard of “confirmation bias”? Irving sees what he wants to - even if it means ignoring the stories of thousands of survivors from Auschwitz, some of whom had the unenviable task of collecting bodies after they were gassed, shaving their hair, removing their fillings, then wheeling their bodies to be incinerated.
Get a grip.
Him and Noam Chomsky.
This from the London judgment: "Irving has for his own ideological reasons persistently and deliberately misrepresented and manipulated historical evidence; that for the same reasons he has portrayed Hitler in an unwarrantedly favourable light, principally in relation to his attitude towards and responsibility for the treatment of the Jews; that he is an active Holocaust denier; that he is anti-Semitic and racist, and that he associates with right-wing extremists who promote neo-Nazism...]therefore the defence of justification succeeds... It follows that there must be judgment for the Defendants."
@@robertmatch6550 both genocide deniers
@NoelRandom can you point to where Chonsky denied any genocide? Be specific please
By this time in 2014 Irvine is a beaten old man . I salute you David you led a good fight.
What is the latest information on David Irving?? Is he still speaking??
This poor historian has been gang stalked by the criminal Khazar cult.
David had a fair trial like Corrie, a 98 lb little girl with a loud speaker, in front of a baby killer Khazar invader, driving a bulldozer.
"
"Ruby is alive, Oy vaaboy if we get caught!" Golda Meir
Anyone for whiff of white phosphorus?
Oh yeah, you can trust the Khazars to play fair especially when it comes to law. Just ask the plagiarist Alan Dershowitz.
his books now sell in non fiction. read 4 of them but twists and distorted and leaves out whatever doesn't fit his homosexual fixation with adolph
+Larry Jackson Sad how you poor propagandists obsess over sex and depravity. It's a condition you people should really work to resolve. Perhaps you should go have some kids and then bugger off?
Hav twins too bsdyou can't try Viagra a pump and have to use woman not you little boyfrind
Yeah Larry...if you write like the way you fiddle with a car, you're road kill. I like the Jets shirt though.
I don't even know what he was trying to say there...
I have several oh David’s books and he is wonderful. WWII is a very important part of world history and David Irving is the best historian on the subject. I hate being lied to and I trust Irving and his information.
He has written about WW2 according to him, mostly lies and made up crap to make Hitler look better than he was. A lyiong anti Semite and Holocaust denier.
From the London libel judgment: "Irving has for his own ideological reasons persistently and deliberately misrepresented and manipulated historical evidence; that for the same reasons he has portrayed Hitler in an unwarrantedly favourable light, principally in relation to his attitude towards and responsibility for the treatment of the Jews; that he is an active Holocaust denier; that he is anti-Semitic and racist, and that he associates with right-wing extremists who promote neo-Nazism... therefore the defence of justification succeeds...It follows that there must be judgment for the Defendants."
Thanks for the upload. I fucking love this man.
you mean love fucking that man
You looking in mirrorvpoodle boy
Oh you're really scary get lost opunk
I fifnt send OU any uplosfs not sure whsu t referring to
Omg should be shot for that
We the people need to stand against the same people who tried everything to destroy this great man
It is shocking how much control they have
Whatever people think of Mr Irving one thing that can't be denied is his Knowledge both factual and anecdotal of that period of History
@doug barker so what !
@@danielgreen3715 “who cares if he is a liar”
The court was corrupt, anyone who has done even a small amount of research on David Irving knows he only tells the truth
From the London judgment: "Irving has for his own ideological reasons persistently and deliberately misrepresented and manipulated historical evidence; that for the same reasons he has portrayed Hitler in an unwarrantedly favourable light, principally in relation to his attitude towards and responsibility for the treatment of the Jews; that he is an active Holocaust denier; that he is anti-Semitic and racist, and that he associates with right-wing extremists who promote neo-Nazism...therefore the defence of justification succeeds... It follows that there must be judgment for the Defendants."
Very interesting indeed......apart from that maddening fucking idiot wandering around behind David Irving. Couldn't he just sit down?
This event needs to be applaud for those that have letting him speak and those that listend, the few in my mind last believers in that is know as freedom of speech!
Cutting out a man's tongue doesn't prove him a liar.
It just proves you are scared of what he has to say.
If the holocaust didn’t happen, then where is my whole mothers side of my family? Did they just disappear?
You've obviously only read the smears of the man without seeing if they were justified or not
How dramatic
You're hard-pressed to find his lectures on RUclips. They started taking them down a while back. Hmmm
Clearly not hard pressed to watch and comment on a video featuring Irving as we are watching and commenting. But go on
I have read all of Mr. Irving's books.
I have met and talked to Mr. Irving personally with fellow historians over coffee in Krakow.
A fascinating historian.
A incredibly brittle and unpleasant person.
So do you respect him or not
@@allisnotwhatitseems.
I respect his scholarly achievements , especially the research of Hitler's personal physician .
I do not respect his dismissive and bloviating pomposity.
From my observations, David Irving's affections for Herr Himmler border on the obcene.
@@indiosveritas a seemingly sane person in this comment section? It’s a miracle
More pompous than any other historian like the clowns in Egypt that control the narrative? Or the swine who controlled information during covid, who were impossible to question
@@amanartistpainter
Stop playing the stupid boy , amap.
Those who tell the truth are the ones most persecuted and the most in danger...
While I don’t agree with many things he says I do believe in his right to speak. At least he tries to back up his theories with actual research. Most people just talk what comes to mind with no analysis.
What don't you agree with ?
The more I hear of David Irving's life experiences, the more I am convinced he is telling the truth in his books and speeches. Only the Truth gets this much resistance.
"The further a society moves from truth, the more it will hate those who speak it" Orwell.
And it will hate Irving, the biggest liar of them all. He is a libelous cretin.
Priceless. This is the most real, honest, legitimate historical research that can possibly be done. It should be embraced, as it is appropriate for all educated people, academics, and students to question what was written and concluded before. I could listen to this man for hours and hours with never being bored.
Listen to this man. As befits a Nazi asshole.
Thank you for your assessment but unfortunately you saying it is the “most real, honest, legitimate historical research” doesn’t mean his research and conclusions are any of the sort.
He is a politically motivated liar
As history shows when tyrants come to power the first order of. Business is to take away firearms the second is to silence churches ,historians and intellectuals.
I agree. People who are upset by him are upset by the truth
@@shkodranalbi Or, worse, actively want to suppress it.
David Irving in my opinion is one of the greatest historians of all time. The powers at be will do everything to stop mr Irving from tell the truth about the Holocaust!! The man is 85 years old thank god we have the many books he has written.
The British invented everything in WW2, we are very clever people the British. Whether you agree with this man, he is highly intelligent. That is abosulute fact
Who is the man in the suit in the background?? Notice how he has a hidden side arm under his right hand suit pocket.....WTF.
How can anyone respect a scholar who carries his documents in a donut box?
This is a great talk.
If he's talking nonsense, why is he censored so heavily, including his movements being restricted?
Because gullible smoothbrains who blame their personal shortcomings on minorities will believe him and shoot up some place full of innocent people
Helen Smith (of blessed memory):- "In the US, there is no freedom of speech when it comes to questioning Israeli atrocities."
More then in Germany.
Why is he accused of being a Holocaust denier? He doesn´t seem to say anything that supports that.
Because he denies many historical facts and makes Hitler out to be some innocent leader. Forget about Mein Kamph and the Nuremberg laws. .
It’s because he denies the 6 million figure, if you still think bad things happened but question the official number, you’re still classified as a “holocaust denier”
Europa the last battle documentary is the real truth of ww2
Irving is like a ventriloquist. Can clearly hear his words but his mouth does not seem to move.
Thank you for your bravery David.
David you are appreciated greatly- Thank you always
Mr. David Irving is not infatuated with Hitler to the extent that he loves the man. He simply understands that every leader, whether it's Churchill, Hitler or Roosevelt, is/was at heart a ruthless person in their pursuits. The difference between the leaders is minor at best. He also understands that with every type government, enforcement is ultimately the end of a gun barrel.
The Nuremberg laws alone put Hitler in a league of his own compared to other leaders mentioned
The difference between Roosevelt and Hitler is minor?
Very nice equivocation.
Irving tried his hardest to portray Hitler as positive as possible as many historians have criticized him for ,among the many criticisms.
@@vhufeosqap Yes, minor when you consider his domestic policies and his perfidy in getting the Japanese to attack Pearl while playing ignorant of the plans.
They price you pay for telling the truth in this God forsaken world
poor guy... he's a guy i'd definitely buy a pint. glad to hear he recieves support from around the world...
Apart from all the brilliant historical stuff I love his personal bits. 6 months visa analysis. I guess in the small print it is clearly set out but come on. On 40 minutes the two people 'dining'....'have they ordered yet ?' Brilliant.
David Irving is a very real and powerful historian who doesn't just go with the popular narrative to play it safe. He gets to the deep levels of what really went down in a key time that reverberates through our lives now.
Revisionist par excellamce
This gentleman is a wealth of knowledge. I wish he was my history teacher in school. People are stupid to think he’s anti Semitic, not true at all. First of all, history is written by the winners. Mr. Irving is a great researcher of the facts, he’d make a great detective. He just writes the facts. Had Germany won WW2, Mr. Irving would be banned in Germany because he would write all the facts on how the war was won, and some of those facts would be embarrassing for Germany. He does not deviate from the facts. He doesn’t play favorites. His book on Hitler’s war should be required reading for any historian. He is a proud Englishman who thinks Churchill bankrupted England during WW2. As an American, I respect Mr. Irving. I know he doesn’t think too highly of Americans mainly because of the way he was harassed while lecturing in the states. Most Americans respect and admire this gentleman. I feel bad that he has to go through all this crap with immigration just to give his in-person lectures in the states. For God sakes, this gentleman is harmless and is just a great historian and he’s no harm to anyone. Christ, most Americans aren’t even interested in history and couldn’t care less about it. He lectures for the students of history and political junkies. The only thing about him that’s alarming to a few people is Mr. Irving simply tells the facts to history. And to some people, they find the facts a little embarrassing. Let him alone, there’s only 20 or so people that are interested in his talks when he lectures in a city. It shows you how illiterate and dumbed-down we’ve become when it takes more energy to stop him from coming than it does to the actual people interested in listening to his talks.
Not only should historians read Hitler's War they did in fact read it and found it full of shit.
@@jplb96 which part?
@@nightowl5475 The entire book is full of deliberately mistranslated sources to portray the Nazi regime in a more favourite light and to support Irving's arguments and points. Irving deliberately lied about what sources said.
He puts out wild claims unsupported by evidence and draws massive conclusions from one piece of evidence such as claiming that because one sentence in Himmler's diary said one specific group of Jews that were transported from Latvia should not be executed that Hitler in fact ordered the no Jews ever were to be exterminated. He later accepted he was completely wrong on this. He done that while simultaneously claiming that because he couldn't find one document from Hitler explicitly stating that we should kill the Jews that we can ignore all the other people around Hitler saying that there was. He has one standard for Nazi's and another standard for everyone else.
@@jplb96 Well everyone knows Hitler didn't like the jews. I don't see how anyone could question that. I mean, come on, look what the nazi's did. You mean to tell me they didn't get approval to do that? Of course Hitler approved the killing of the Jews. That's crazy to even try to sell.
@@jplb96 What I found interesting was about what this gentleman wrote about Himler. Check out the story he said on You Tube. He said, Himler didn't commit suicide. The Brits beat the crap outta him. On Himler's death mask, his face was all bruised up and beaten. Which he deserved of course. But what Irving was saying was, Himler was beaten to death by the Brits. What do you think of that story? Those Brits had a hard-on to get to that little bastard. Maybe they went over-board and beat the tar outta him. No one would complain but is Irving on to something? I mean, as bad as the nazi were, we all want the truth. Was Himler beaten to death by British intelligence??
Millions of Polish and Russian civilians died in the war.
How many Jews died in the war outside of the holocaust?
Millions of German civilians also.
A great historian
what a amazing man, blackpeople need to listen to this man
Lol
You mean everyone and I agree
Maybe Kanye did
The Last Historian… if someday we make a movie on him… that should be it’s title.
Great idea!
"The Revisionist" for Zundel.
Worship him more
That part where he said that only a tin can and a piece of barbed wire was ever found at Sobibor really staggered me. I mean we're talking about a quarter of million people that would have been killed there, and none of them dropped a piece of jewelry, a coin or lost a button while waking that final stretch to the undressing rooms? And none from the mounts of clothing and personal items that the victims left ever dropped to the ground while being moved. Not to speak of the SS guards and executioners, the Ukrainians and the "Sonderkommando" that lived there permanently, must have been several hundred or thousands of people. They all must have eaten, the SS men at least drank frequently, and supposedly had orgies, and they never left any rubbish, the way all human habitation does? Or is the suggestion that the Germans bulldozed the entire top-layer of earth away too?
I also think the suggestion that the methods of execution, ways of disposing of the bodies, and site of the graves etc. are trivial questions, is absurd. One of the largest massacres in word history, and a unique one in the way it was carried out, and the methods are an irrelevancy? If anything, whether or not Hitler knew, or how much he knew is the trivial question, although I understand that he's coming from a very particular point of view.
when hitoriand like Kershaw tolandand Countess others cobtradict him I'll believe them if you watched trial had to backtrack on almost everything
please and you actually believevthst read some books by more crediblevhidtoriansvIe kersshawv fest bullock none are jewv2 englishvine gernnman you might learn dimthing
+Larry Jackson Why the HELL don't you learn how to Spell ? You're a fucking MORON.
And you're stupid enough to believe that poodle boy
Grow up at least what little brain power 💪 you have go to Germany you'll see all original records you deniers are either stupid by more likely jew hstrers, spreading propaganda to the ones even dumber than you
Such a shame the camera work and production were so poor in this video. And the bastard wandering around in the background is just distracting. Didn't the camera man or director notice. Otherwise the content is very interesting.
+Andrew Erntell
"And the bastard wandering around in the background is just distracting."
Actually, Andrew, I think you'll find - if you check the other RUclips version of this - that the guy was keeping an eye out (through the door pane behind David) for the usual Rent-a-Mob troublemakers: they ALWAYS seem to turn up at these events - just to spoil things for everyone......................
Yep - it IS a little annoying - but necessary, I fear.
+Andrew Erntell that's ungrateful of you. Why should you have any opportunity to hear him speak, since the recorders are the ones who paid for the event.
The person in the background is his security, he has to be checking and alert.
The word on the street is that guarding the pits was a tough job. The pits would move. Up and down.. sometimes a zombie would crawl out of the pits and you had to deal with it quickly before it escaped
Where's the himmler book?
It’s out, I ordered it but it’s still not out from the publishers yet. My copy will be mailed when they are up to speed
Das ist Wunderbar, Vielen Dank.
unterstütz diesen drecksack doch nicht
A lot of the questions that were posted to David were a bit sophomoric and demonstrated that they were not listening to him during his presentation and the Q&A, or didn't understand him.
"It ain't over till the fat lady sings,"
~TUPAC
. Such a great speaker
Heinrich Himmler despite his rank in the SS was never actually a serving soldier.
May I ask what conclusion are you drawing from that? In the last months of WW2 he did actually serve as commander of the "replacement army" on the Vistula (and made a total cock-up of it!)
Hard to find him on YT.......
A lot of his work is destroyed yes. Also hidden. That’s how they do it.
,, I watched a history channel which showed Hitler giving a speech introduced by Goebbels, that's when I became fascinated by all this.
it's amazing how well he knows his shit (subjects he's talking).
I am asking myself how in the hell i ever het this smart to even remember all those Dates and Numbers he is litterally a Memory machine
that visa trick is so fucked up! Why they think this helps their case is beyond me!
Kinda like listening to him for some reason
Yes a most entertaining and instructive hour. The notion of the Holocaust as an iron curtain coming down at half time in a theatre - to quell discussion - is memorable.
I remember being drawn into youtube by this man. I became, not a Holocaust denier, but a Holocaust doubter, as in doubting the way id been taught what had happened. No shame in questioning authority given how we've been lied to about so much. If it makes sense...then perhaps we should listen. Please that we're allowed to decide for ourselves. Please that we're allowed more then one sourse of info, of news. I say please as if im speaking to a benevolent universe, not an authoritative master. Masters don't generally listen to pleas.
Can it be that Rotchild rules?No,THAT would be a Conspiracy.ShalÖm