@@its_kay_08 occasionally the iss will go at really low altitudes every few years for realignment. It keeps its speed as it descends and uses its momentum to go back up. Hes not being sarcastic
My dad is an RAF veteran so I’ve always been interested in aircraft. I’ve watched Concorde fly over our house every Tuesday, seen F35s take off and land, I’ve witnessed The Red Arrows displays many times and I see/hear/smell Spitfires every day as I still live near Daedalus airport. I still get excited every time a Spitfire takes off and run outside to admire it. Yes - I’m a geek! 😂
@@karlpedersen7 I’m so lucky! I also get to see all the cruise liners coming and going, and all the Royal Navy ships. HMS Queen Elizabeth took my breath away the first time I saw her come into Portsmouth. My brother in law served on her. I’ll shut up now as I know I can be way too enthusiastic (and boring) about it! 😂😂
Wickedly cool video Ben! I’m a crusty old aviation veteran but this brought a genuine smile to my face. Especially showing the ISS at orbital speed but at tree top level 🫡
Went through this entire video assuming the guy who made this had at least 100K subs, and I’m SHOCKED to see HOW underrated you are my friend! seriously enjoyed watching this great quality video, keep up the great work and one day it will spring into reality, best of wishes💙💙💙
This is such a visually impressive speed comparison, and the audio really adds to the sensation of speed with each vehicle. Big well done to the creator/creators of this fine video. Respect.
@gammr3227 Then it should use distance over time like MPH, km/h, knots, etc…. not Mach which doesn’t apply to anything in a vacuum. Mach is also a poor measure of speed in aircraft. We use Mach at high speed like we use indicated airspeed at low speeds because the aircraft will behave the same aerodynamically at the same IAS or Mach which is important for performance and safety. But true airspeed can be very different. Like when the SR-71 flies in cold air and can get a faster Mach.. the speed of sound is slower in cold air so the true airspeed is the same. It’s not going any “faster”.
@@calvinnickel9995 You're the guy who always finds something to argue about or crows away picking apart every tiny detail of things nobody even said. Can't have anything fun or interesting without you here doing this.
I thought of it while Concorde was still flying (80s/90s). In fact, it was faster, just as manouvrable and didn't need compression suits to travel in it. The fighters don't have the range of Concorde either.
The jet engine was invented just up the road from me at RAF Wittering, Cambridgeshire, UK. There'd have been a fair few jet fighters dreamt up before Concorde came along;
3 месяца назад
I wasn’t expecting that. And the multiple sonic booms that would make if it could sustain an atmospheric flight was an awesome touch.
There aren’t multiple sonic booms, actually. It’s one continuous sonic boom, but you only hear it once from your reference point once the sound wave reaches you. But yeah it’s actually a continuous thing.
I love the fact that you included sound delay and human camera movement, it helps a lot to appreciate the velocity of these objects, congratulations ! A few suggestions/comments : * The whole scientific community as well as a majority of countries around the globe use metric system. It's a pity they cannot appreciate your job as you stick to imperial units. * I doubt the fighters you show would achieve top speed with fuel supply under the wings. Of course they would also need to fly at high altitude but for the sake of entertainment it is reasonable to show them close to the ground.
Note: At only several hundred feet, The Max Speed of a Passenger Jet is far less due to Air Resistance. So, what were the objects flown into the World Trade Centres on September 11th 2001 ?
SR-72 mach 10? Seriously? Seems impossible to me, but who am I to say ... SR71 made mach 3.3 - although there are rumours of it making 3.5 - 3.6 ... fun video! Thx!
Yet even as blisteringly fast as the ISS is, it would still take almost 20 years to reach Neptune, the outer-most planet in the Solar System. And it would take a 747 about 850 years to get there (if it could fly in space, which of course it can't.) The distances between things in space are mind-boggling.
Really nice video, thanks. I think it's time to honor the historic significance of the original Wright Flyer with a supersonic upgrade.* Let's retrofit the old beloved bird with a single Pratt & Whitney F100-PW-220. With the afterburning turbofan lit up, providing a total 14,590lb of thrust, the ol' gal might do Mach 1.5**, while retaining its beloved nostalgic look of the turn of the 19th to the 20th century. Better late than never-let's properly welcome the Wright Flyer to the 21st century! _*There may be some strengthening of the airframe and other slight modifications needed._ _**The pilot should probably wear a helmet. Maybe some gloves._
Great video! I'd love to know how you done the flyby views as the new MSFS does not have a dedicated flyby view option (or does it? Maybe I've not discovered it). It's one of the things I've always liked about flight sims in general. With the amazing realism of MSFS they really should have made this a priority.
Guy flying the ISS has king size cajones flying that low. BTW, everyone exceeding 250 KIAS below 10,000’ MSL and flying below 500’ AGL over the Ranger Station, possible pilot deviations. I have a number for you, please advise when ready to copy.
@@JohnHazenhousen correct my bad I was half asleep and knew that. My main question was the docking. You have two things going 22000 mph. It just seems it would be impossible and or very violent
@@JohnHazenhousen let's take a 556 round from a gun going approximately 3000 fps( 2045 mph) and take another round and have them meet perfectly. Alright now multiply that 8 times roughly to equal close to that 17000 mph the iss and shuttle are going. Oh and also I'm coming from a bias perspective knowing that we probably didn't go to the moon.
@@PoppaTrump Why would a bullet fired from a gun be the analogy you go for? Why not an aeroplane landing on a runway? Or even a car parking in a parking spot? The parking spot is moving at about 67,000 miles an hour, and the car is probably moving at about 67,002 miles an hour. Why does that seem impossible to you? And yes, we landed on the Moon. Just because you don't understand something, doesn't mean it's fake.
![I.N "HALLUCINATION" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/n5B5q1Hwt_U/mqdefault.jpg)
You should see my dog when it's bath time.
haha
💀
@@initialdae8642Imagine being dirty minded
@@Test.Unknown Wdym?
@@Test.Unknown Huh?
This is genuinely impressive, really really well made considering it's msfs. It flows very well
Looks like nobody can beat The International Space Station in a race.
Parker solar probe:🗿🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@Georgeoglanderthose laughing emojis ruined it I don’t need you to show me what emotion this is meant to convey ☹️☹️☹️☹️☹️☹️☹️☹️☹️☹️☹️☹️☹️☹️
@@gammr3227 ok jeez keep ur hair on
@@GeorgeoglanderSays the bald one
@@Adrian-fj3pt I’m not bald
I was hiking last week while the ISS did a Mach-22 flyover at 75 feet AGL. It was great.
Are you being sarcastic 😂
@@its_kay_08 no this actually happened bro
@@its_kay_08 occasionally the iss will go at really low altitudes every few years for realignment. It keeps its speed as it descends and uses its momentum to go back up. Hes not being sarcastic
75 feet???
I feel for the ranger in his tower, getting repeatedly buzzed like that.
Probably spilled lots of coffee on his shirt!
... and other brown stuff into his pants...
prob dead by now
Probably took up drinking whiskey 😅
It has done wonders for his constipation!
My dad is an RAF veteran so I’ve always been interested in aircraft. I’ve watched Concorde fly over our house every Tuesday, seen F35s take off and land, I’ve witnessed The Red Arrows displays many times and I see/hear/smell Spitfires every day as I still live near Daedalus airport. I still get excited every time a Spitfire takes off and run outside to admire it. Yes - I’m a geek! 😂
hav u heard of boom overture?
its a future supersonic airliner with first flight hoping to be by 2030
I'd be a Geek of Military Aircraft if I lived near a Base. Im so envious 👍😁
@@karlpedersen7 I’m so lucky! I also get to see all the cruise liners coming and going, and all the Royal Navy ships. HMS Queen Elizabeth took my breath away the first time I saw her come into Portsmouth. My brother in law served on her. I’ll shut up now as I know I can be way too enthusiastic (and boring) about it! 😂😂
Fast jet fighters with pilots in G-Suits at Mach 2- and Concorde flying past at the same speed with passengers having their dinner..........
because fighter jets do highly accrobatic maneuvers, and concordes just fly like a regular airliner
@@Napoleon_e2Its still interesting that an airliner could out speed these jets, thats a characteristic you would want in a high altitude bomber
@@gamertardguardian1299 yeah
Most jets aren’t doing high G maneuvers at Mach 2. They are subsonic when maneuvering.
@gamertardguardian1299 It would be cool if the concord could also be used as a bomber, but thats up to the government.
Love the A-10 “brrrrrttt”!😅
Wickedly cool video Ben!
I’m a crusty old aviation veteran but this brought a genuine smile to my face.
Especially showing the ISS at orbital speed but at tree top level
🫡
Brrrrt! :0) The ISS to round it off was a lovely touch! Thanks for the fun!
Went through this entire video assuming the guy who made this had at least 100K subs, and I’m SHOCKED to see HOW underrated you are my friend! seriously enjoyed watching this great quality video, keep up the great work and one day it will spring into reality, best of wishes💙💙💙
Wtf why are you here billy, and why am I here too?
No way I spotted a wild billy
Woah
Pero si solo se grabó en el MFS2020
A small channel making amazing videos! I love to see it! Keep up the work 👍
This is such a visually impressive speed comparison, and the audio really adds to the sensation of speed with each vehicle. Big well done to the creator/creators of this fine video. Respect.
this video is exactly what i’ve been needing my entire life
If ISS was going at mach 22 on the atmosphere, it would completely desintegrate
no dur Sherlock, it’s aerodynamic is quite literally a brick.
also I’m pretty sure the game doesn’t account for the iss lol
It’s a speed visualisation not a simulation of how they would act in the atmosphere
@gammr3227
Then it should use distance over time like MPH, km/h, knots, etc…. not Mach which doesn’t apply to anything in a vacuum.
Mach is also a poor measure of speed in aircraft. We use Mach at high speed like we use indicated airspeed at low speeds because the aircraft will behave the same aerodynamically at the same IAS or Mach which is important for performance and safety.
But true airspeed can be very different. Like when the SR-71 flies in cold air and can get a faster Mach.. the speed of sound is slower in cold air so the true airspeed is the same. It’s not going any “faster”.
@@calvinnickel9995 You're the guy who always finds something to argue about or crows away picking apart every tiny detail of things nobody even said. Can't have anything fun or interesting without you here doing this.
@@calvinnickel9995 6:21 Speed - 17,500mph
Did you watch the video?
Awesome job! :)
By the way, Concorde is the most beautiful from all of them!
Fantastically brilliantly put together. truly amazing.
Very nice to see them compared. Thank you!!
Love this! great vid!
I like this video. Very cool - thx!
Excellent, very entertaining. I look forward to your next vid.
Awesome video Ben!! Keep up the great work buddy!!
Great vid man
1:22 top cinco scariest jumpscares
Numero uno: dhc2 biver
Humskare
Fantastic choice of music as well.
Love that. All different scenarios for different planes and not just the same static shot for everything
probably the best speed comparison video I've seen
Great video👍
I still say Concorde is THE greatest plane EVER built. The End.🇬🇧🇫🇷
Sorry buddy, but that honor goes to the SR-71.
yo what's the name of that beat that started at 1:25?
I too wanna know that
Great job and thanks for sharing and subd !
That was cool!
Concorde is still one of the most beautiful man made creations.
Incredible video!
Cool video gives people chance to see how machines in the air are way quicker then anything on the ground👍👍👍
The fact a Concorde fly as quick as a jetfighter is something you never tought of until viewing this. Thats just crazy.
I thought of it while Concorde was still flying (80s/90s). In fact, it was faster, just as manouvrable and didn't need compression suits to travel in it. The fighters don't have the range of Concorde either.
The jet engine was invented just up the road from me at RAF Wittering, Cambridgeshire, UK. There'd have been a fair few jet fighters dreamt up before Concorde came along;
I wasn’t expecting that. And the multiple sonic booms that would make if it could sustain an atmospheric flight was an awesome touch.
There aren’t multiple sonic booms, actually. It’s one continuous sonic boom, but you only hear it once from your reference point once the sound wave reaches you. But yeah it’s actually a continuous thing.
So interesting how the bigger a craft is, the slower it looks. The Concorde looked slow, even though it was going at the same speed as the Tomcat.
I always feel like the ISS is just floating along like a hot air balloon.
Very great video!
I love the little astronaut casually hovering around the ISS
Was this set in So Cal, the below cloud fly bys?
wow this is so cool !
I love these videos, 👏👏👏
awesome video thanks!
Concorde.. wow.. new perspective.. mind blowing.
Where on the map is that scenery from 1:40? Looks like mountain biker's paradise. I must know where this is.
I love the fact that you included sound delay and human camera movement, it helps a lot to appreciate the velocity of these objects, congratulations !
A few suggestions/comments :
* The whole scientific community as well as a majority of countries around the globe use metric system. It's a pity they cannot appreciate your job as you stick to imperial units.
* I doubt the fighters you show would achieve top speed with fuel supply under the wings. Of course they would also need to fly at high altitude but for the sake of entertainment it is reasonable to show them close to the ground.
i wasnt sure where it was going after the darkstar and then the iss goes flying by haha that was great.
I didnt realise the iss could fly so low. Interesting stuff.
Very cool 😁👍
ISS is more aerodynamic than I thought.
what’s the location at 3:31?
Hayforks bally lookout.
Watching the astronauts hanging for dear life as the ISS does a fly-by at Mach 22, sensational!
Nicely done.
Love this vid
And just like this, the mighty Mach 3.32 SR-71 Blackbird was forgotten away.
good job, well done!
Cool video!
Concorde wouldn’t have had afterburners lit at Mach 2, they were turned off at 1.7 and then the aircraft was able to ‘supercruise’ without them.
1:38 couldnt help but notice the cub that has nose dived lol
YOOO I LOVE THIS
Note: At only several hundred feet, The Max Speed of a Passenger Jet is far less due to Air Resistance.
So, what were the objects flown into the World Trade Centres on September 11th 2001 ?
the antonove made a very unique sound, like a low bass rumble..it flew over my house a few times.
This is ISS declaring an emergency landing. How long is your runway?
I love the way it flowed with the music and the attention to detail….the sounds…..10s across the board
Faaaack the f35 sounds unreal on flyby
1:38 - what is that yellow object? A plane wreck?
Yes
Yes
Yes
F
Yes
SR-72 mach 10? Seriously? Seems impossible to me, but who am I to say ... SR71 made mach 3.3 - although there are rumours of it making 3.5 - 3.6 ... fun video! Thx!
No SR71 Blackbird?
what is that place called that the a 10 flies over?
Cool 😊 !
Technically, the ISS is not flying but rather constantly falling😂😂😂❤❤❤
I like how you showed my 747. I have almost 11,000 hours in that beauty.
left out a few stalworth crafts like the P 51...DC 3...Lockeed Constellation....F 86 saber Jet....727 whisperjet
Cool!
Fantastic
A shame the Blackbird wasn't included or that Mach 6 rocket plane from the 1950s.
Yet even as blisteringly fast as the ISS is, it would still take almost 20 years to reach Neptune, the outer-most planet in the Solar System. And it would take a 747 about 850 years to get there (if it could fly in space, which of course it can't.) The distances between things in space are mind-boggling.
Wow, that's nutso
so is this the next video thats gonna be linked to "Me at the zoo"?
Doubt it 😂
@@benhalvorson3581It is
Really nice video, thanks.
I think it's time to honor the historic significance of the original Wright Flyer with a supersonic upgrade.* Let's retrofit the old beloved bird with a single Pratt & Whitney F100-PW-220. With the afterburning turbofan lit up, providing a total 14,590lb of thrust, the ol' gal might do Mach 1.5**, while retaining its beloved nostalgic look of the turn of the 19th to the 20th century. Better late than never-let's properly welcome the Wright Flyer to the 21st century!
_*There may be some strengthening of the airframe and other slight modifications needed._
_**The pilot should probably wear a helmet. Maybe some gloves._
If I lived in the watchtower, it would be fun to watch the sonic booms will get old😂
Great video! I'd love to know how you done the flyby views as the new MSFS does not have a dedicated flyby view option (or does it? Maybe I've not discovered it). It's one of the things I've always liked about flight sims in general. With the amazing realism of MSFS they really should have made this a priority.
Use the active pause, go to camera settings and select drone view. Then you can unpause and watch your plane fly by
@@Kendop16 I use a third party add on called Flight Recorder, then go into drone mode. And finally I use an Xbox controller so I can pan smoothly.
I don't understand. What is the next station to take the ISS?
Man, you should see when I’m late for work
what music used in the beginning of this video? so calm
What is the music at 1:40 and on? Thank you
Anyone?
How come the trees don't sway when jets pass?
W animating skills
erm its a game not animations🙏
6:20 weekends:
Which fs is this? Pretty realistic.
3:40 A -10 brrrrrrtt sound 😍
what is the airport where you used the f22, concorde?
I moved to this weather station up here in the mountains to finish my novel, but it sure is noisy around here.
Did I miss the SR 71. No. Why was it not there
what video game is this ??
100% accurate or not, pretty darn cool video.
You should see my wife jumping to conclusions. Probably faster than the speed of light
dang. iunno, what's quicker? your wit or your wife jumping to conclusions!?
Can i know where did you film the replays in 3:33?
Please i'd like to know the location and weather preset thank you.
I guess you’re deriving your Mach values from the speed of sound at sea level instead of at altitude?
Guy flying the ISS has king size cajones flying that low.
BTW, everyone exceeding 250 KIAS below 10,000’ MSL and flying below 500’ AGL over the Ranger Station, possible pilot deviations. I have a number for you, please advise when ready to copy.
How do you not experience gforce on ISS and I'd like to know exactly how they catch up to it and dock onto it.
Why would they experience G-force? It's travelling at a constant velocity.
@@JohnHazenhousen correct my bad I was half asleep and knew that. My main question was the docking. You have two things going 22000 mph. It just seems it would be impossible and or very violent
@@PoppaTrump Why would it be impossible or violent?
@@JohnHazenhousen let's take a 556 round from a gun going approximately 3000 fps( 2045 mph) and take another round and have them meet perfectly. Alright now multiply that 8 times roughly to equal close to that 17000 mph the iss and shuttle are going. Oh and also I'm coming from a bias perspective knowing that we probably didn't go to the moon.
@@PoppaTrump Why would a bullet fired from a gun be the analogy you go for? Why not an aeroplane landing on a runway? Or even a car parking in a parking spot? The parking spot is moving at about 67,000 miles an hour, and the car is probably moving at about 67,002 miles an hour. Why does that seem impossible to you?
And yes, we landed on the Moon. Just because you don't understand something, doesn't mean it's fake.
Not gonna lie, didn't expect to see the ISS! :D