Surly Nate vs Surly Edna │ Surly Fat Bike Tire Showdown

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 17 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 4

  • @ElevationEveryWeekend
    @ElevationEveryWeekend 4 года назад

    Nice overview, and thanks for the shout out! I think I had a much bigger gap in my change to the Edna’s because I had the OG Nate’s on my Pugs (4”, 27tpi, wire bead). Those 3.8” Nates are 60tpi and I’m sure much lighter and higher quality. I do love the Edna’s though so far, still need to snow test them, but the larger size should yield a bigger traction patch. The weight and rolling resistance is great considering they are a larger size. Keep ‘em coming!

    • @TheLankyCyclist
      @TheLankyCyclist  4 года назад +1

      Thanks for the idea! Yeah, the new Nates are good tires. I do think I like the Ednas a bit better. Feel so much faster. For sure, going to roll with them for the winter and maybe switch back for the summer.

  • @sambono8423
    @sambono8423 3 года назад +1

    Great clip thanks for sharing!I Have you tried lower PSI for trail?
    I currently own a few fat bikes 4.0 -4.8 & 10psi is a good road psi, though for trail my Ednas are 6-7psi max. For the 4.8’s 5-6psi offers the best ride....then again i’m not breaking any records, but the grip & control on the single track is amazing, & a great workout to boot. In snow with 4.8 Surly Bud/Lou, or Bud/Bud 3-4psi hits the mark.
    Keep up the great work, I really enjoyed the breakdown of all the data.👍🏻

    • @TheLankyCyclist
      @TheLankyCyclist  3 года назад +1

      The lower PSI wasn't working for me... been experimenting with more like 12-15 on 4.0s (Kenda Juggernauts) for singletrack, and I've been liking that. I was running low single digits on the Ednas in the snow, and agree that the traction was excellent. Thanks for stopping by!