Cantilever Retaining Wall Design Example | Part 4 | Reinforcement Design

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 2 фев 2025

Комментарии • 26

  • @Lutfimized
    @Lutfimized 2 года назад +6

    Great presentation. However, young engineers need to know about the development of the vertical stem bar into the footing! As the bar size gets bigger, the development must be ensured. This may have implications on the footing thickness.

    • @Kestava_Engineering
      @Kestava_Engineering  2 года назад +3

      you are pinned to the top of the comments my friend! great point, i mention this at the end of this design example as something we do not cover. #8's will be difficult to fully develop and once I get to that step I would probably reduce my bar size and decrease spacing to help out. very very good point.

    • @TonyA-ex1sj
      @TonyA-ex1sj 2 года назад +4

      @@Kestava_Engineering by using a smaller diameter or Bar, you can also control cracking in case you're designing walls of a water treatment plant to avoid leaking or infiltration.

  • @Bradkrahn
    @Bradkrahn Год назад +1

    Kestava, Great video series which has helped me improve my engineering skills. You’ve covered the design of the stem wall but I’m curious to see your approach to designing the reinforcement for the footing!! That would definitely complete the design series

  • @PhillyBoy
    @PhillyBoy Год назад

    Thanks!

    • @Kestava_Engineering
      @Kestava_Engineering  Год назад

      @PhillyBoy thank you! that's amazingly generous and really really appreciate the donation. installing that gold plaque in the auditorium as we speak!

  • @BobbyPH
    @BobbyPH 11 месяцев назад

    Thank you Kestava for a very helpful video! 😃

  • @MuhammadWaseem-kp4yh
    @MuhammadWaseem-kp4yh 5 месяцев назад

    Thank you… great work.. very helpful ❤

  • @spyrospycrab1815
    @spyrospycrab1815 9 месяцев назад

    Thank you, helped me a bunch on my foundation problem.

  • @Krazyboy
    @Krazyboy 2 месяца назад

    what would be the factor for lfrd if there were a lateral seismic force,

  • @jackyeh7512
    @jackyeh7512 2 года назад +1

    Excellent!

  • @juanjimenezpina4453
    @juanjimenezpina4453 2 года назад +1

    Hi Kestava thanks for the awesome content! When you were calculating different iterations was that process a numerical method technique?

  • @nadifaaulia9676
    @nadifaaulia9676 5 месяцев назад

    hello, may I ask about the bw you refer to at 07:39. it's 12", isn't it? Thankyou

    • @nadifaaulia9676
      @nadifaaulia9676 5 месяцев назад

      i think i understand, its 1 feet = 12" right? i usually using metric and its little bit confusing me 😅

    • @Kestava_Engineering
      @Kestava_Engineering  5 месяцев назад +1

      @@nadifaaulia9676 you are correct!

  • @christianparente4276
    @christianparente4276 7 месяцев назад

    Thanks for the video? What does jd mean and where did you come up with 0.875d?

  • @Anghel57190
    @Anghel57190 2 года назад +1

    Excellent presentation! Try this formula in determining area of steel.
    As= Mu/4d (Mu in k-ft, d in inches).

  • @kevin-4649
    @kevin-4649 Год назад

    if in the passive segmen we have some pressure, from river water for example, are this include in our Mu calculation for stem calculation? Great presentation btw

    • @Kestava_Engineering
      @Kestava_Engineering  Год назад

      absolutely! if you have hydrostatic pressure to account for then it needs to be included in your demand when calculating Mu and Vu

  • @desireatieku9042
    @desireatieku9042 2 года назад

    Kestava, thanks a lot for the explanation...Can you kindly distinguise for me which of the steels is for Near face and Far face?
    Also, kindly represent the steels calculated on the retaining wall diagram for me including which direction is for shrinkage reduction

  • @JakeLemasterGuitar
    @JakeLemasterGuitar Год назад

    Can you point to where “j” comes from in the ACI 318-14? I’m not too familiar with the code yet

    • @Kestava_Engineering
      @Kestava_Engineering  Год назад

      its funny - i dont think "j" is really outlined in the ACI - it is a variable that stems from the compression block and coincides with "a" and "c" and is a great tool to estimate beam and rebar sizes without multiple iterations. usually more seasoned engineers use this method as it takes a bit of well rounded understanding on concrete design. but anyone can use it!