Why are you participating in bringing back a controversial issue into the struggle of the True Orthodox? You are discrediting our struggle. Most people see this as a dead issue that was dealt with, and condemned. Elder Kallinikos, the assembly of Mount Athos, the Patriarchates of Constantinople and Antioch condemned it. ROCOR did not consider this an “open” but dead issue. No one in ROCOR was a name-worshipper.
@@godsaveus4380 I already covered those in my video. The person that lead the synodal decision was sergius and he said the energies of God arent God which is Barlaamism. In 1914 the synodal decision was reversed and retrialed. You also wrongly condemn it bc none of us believe letters and sounds are God. But we say uncreated energies work through them. Theophan of Poltava supported Imiaslavie and said it was Orthodox. Many matthewites see it as Orthodox. Many new martyrs and catacomb saints were Imiaslavie and Tsar nicholas supported it and met with Bulatovitch. Tikhon later deemed them not heretical and Orthodox. Joachim the 3rd who condemned it was a freemason. Those that condemned it were modernists and nominalists.
Vladimir Moss is right... You preach heresy with this video clip... Repent my brother, and stay away from the spirit of quarrel and empty debate of Russian Athos mystics,you need simplicity of the spirit to analyse passionless
If you are against the belief God works through letters and sounds or the word "Jesus" and claim it is empty and meaningless, you are against imiaslavie and you are a blasphemer.
@OldCalenderZealot Repent, it's a subject above you understanding... Do not act so smart to other TO brothers of yours, you need inner insight of your sins, before dealing with apologetics
I get the impression that the whole point is the energies don't come from the name. But from God Himself. God imparts the energies, not the name. Savvy? It seems like you're making false claims about what most people are accusing you of.
Well yes. We call the uncreated energy which sanctifies the created material depicting God "The Name of God". I don't see how you can say this is a heresy. "Letters, sounds, and even concepts used in the Names of God, are created human words. But the revealed truth that they convey about God is uncreated energy. That truth, properly speaking, is the Name of God that the Church continually praises." - Metropolitan Gregory of Boston.
@@OldCalenderZealotTruth isn't an energy. It's a person. I'm also don't want to lose anymore braincells reading your defense of this to be honest, lol.
@@Death2Compromise "Truth, therefore, is not perceived by sense. One could similarly argue that everything created is changeable. But truth is not changeable. Therefore, it is not a creature but is something uncreated." The revealed truth is God because Christ is the truth. And the divine nature of Christ is uncreated.
@@NFTUOrthodoxApologetics Why are you participating in bringing back a controversial issue into the struggle of the True Orthodox? You are discrediting our struggle. Most people see this as a dead issue that was dealt with, and condemned. Elder Kallinikos, the assembly of Mount Athos, the Patriarchates of Constantinople and Antioch condemned it. ROCOR did not consider this an “open” but dead issue. No one in ROCOR was a name-worshipper.
Why are you participating in bringing back a controversial issue into the struggle of the True Orthodox? You are discrediting our struggle. Most people see this as a dead issue that was dealt with, and condemned. Elder Kallinikos, the assembly of Mount Athos, the Patriarchates of Constantinople and Antioch condemned it. ROCOR did not consider this an “open” but dead issue. No one in ROCOR was a name-worshipper.
@@godsaveus4380 I already covered those in my video. The person that lead the synodal decision was sergius and he said the energies of God arent God which is Barlaamism. In 1914 the synodal decision was reversed and retrialed. You also wrongly condemn it bc none of us believe letters and sounds are God. But we say uncreated energies work through them. Theophan of Poltava supported Imiaslavie and said it was Orthodox. Many matthewites see it as Orthodox. Many new martyrs and catacomb saints were Imiaslavie and Tsar nicholas supported it and met with Bulatovitch. Tikhon later deemed them not heretical and Orthodox. Joachim the 3rd who condemned it was a freemason. Those that condemned it were modernists and nominalists.
@@OldCalenderZealot Except none of that happened. 1914 wasn't a retrial. It's all made up.
@@godsaveus4380 This Russian Athonite heresy needs to stay there, among self claimed elders and fighters with no cause
Vladimir Moss is right... You preach heresy with this video clip... Repent my brother, and stay away from the spirit of quarrel and empty debate of Russian Athos mystics,you need simplicity of the spirit to analyse passionless
If you are against the belief God works through letters and sounds or the word "Jesus" and claim it is empty and meaningless, you are against imiaslavie and you are a blasphemer.
@OldCalenderZealot Repent, it's a subject above you understanding... Do not act so smart to other TO brothers of yours, you need inner insight of your sins, before dealing with apologetics
I get the impression that the whole point is the energies don't come from the name. But from God Himself. God imparts the energies, not the name. Savvy? It seems like you're making false claims about what most people are accusing you of.
Well yes. We call the uncreated energy which sanctifies the created material depicting God "The Name of God". I don't see how you can say this is a heresy.
"Letters, sounds, and even concepts used in the Names of God, are created human words. But the revealed truth that they convey about God is uncreated energy. That truth, properly speaking, is the Name of God that the Church continually praises." - Metropolitan Gregory of Boston.
@@OldCalenderZealotTruth isn't an energy. It's a person. I'm also don't want to lose anymore braincells reading your defense of this to be honest, lol.
@@Death2Compromise "Truth, therefore, is not perceived by sense. One could similarly argue that everything created is changeable. But truth is not changeable. Therefore, it is not a creature but is something uncreated." The revealed truth is God because Christ is the truth. And the divine nature of Christ is uncreated.
@@Death2Compromise It never ends with these types
@@NFTUOrthodoxApologetics Why are you participating in bringing back a controversial issue into the struggle of the True Orthodox? You are discrediting our struggle. Most people see this as a dead issue that was dealt with, and condemned. Elder Kallinikos, the assembly of Mount Athos, the Patriarchates of Constantinople and Antioch condemned it. ROCOR did not consider this an “open” but dead issue. No one in ROCOR was a name-worshipper.
Wait he's a writers?!!!