C roc. Even when I'm heading to a fire emergency or a medical emergency. I hav this thing Blasting in my ears. I listen to Pastor Soooo often. I've watched all his videos over and over and over. I Never get tired of it.
*ONEMESS APOSTOLIC CATHOLIC GREEK ORTHODOX TAMMUZIAN PENTECOSTAL HOKINESS Huntington Park ghetto-hood religion is another gospel. There is NO SUCH THING as a message of holiness or a crown of holiness for that matter.*
*Did Tony Harvin give you the debate proposition for you to come in the public and defend the THREE CROSSES OF THE ONEMESS APOSTOLIC CATHOLIC GREEK ORTHODOX TAMMUZIAN PENTECOSTAL HOKINESS Huntington Park ghetto-hood religion and the N.5th Street DUNGHILL CAMPUS...*
Don't stop praying people!! We must PRAY while you're laughing remind yourself that we must PRAY and FASSST please. We love you APOSTLE Jennings. Keep on keeping on.!! Entire Jennings family is covered and ALL that stand with us!!
THE WORD ONE Both Trinitarians and Oneness believe there is one God. But it is how we define it that makes the difference. The Oneness teaching takes all the Scriptures that say God is one and purposely ignore the statements of Jesus and the gospel writers that speak of two or three persons of the Godhead. In the Old Testament teachings were focused on God being one in contrast to the polytheism of the nations that surrounded Israel. There are statements that speak of the plurality of this ONE God in the Old Testament record. However, it is only when we come to the New Testament that this one in unity is explained. Bernard writes that the word apparently can mean both one in unity and one numerically for Strong's defines it as "united, one, first." He then gives just a few examples to prove that we should choose its meaning to be an absolute one.(Oneness of God, pp.152-153) Bernard finds a few examples contrary to the plural meaning which in no way is exhaustive. However the context determines the meaning. In the Old Testament God is described as one. Duet.6:4 says, "Hear, O Israel: LORD our God is one: what Oneness does is camp on this passage, milking it till the cows come home. The phrase "one Lord" is preceded in the Hebrew by elohenu; it is our God is one. The word for one is not a numerical one but is actually a united one. The Hebrew word for one is echad, which comes from the root word achad, which means to unify or collect together (the intensive reflexive form signifying to unite). If this was meant to be a strict numerical statement the Holy Spirit would have had Moses use the word yachid, which means a absolute one, single, only one. Yachid is used twelve times in the Scriptures NOT ONCE is it used for Jehovah God. Despite all the explanations we can see they fail in light of the consistent usage of the word one throughout. The Bible defines how the word one is used. Gen.1:5 evening and morning are called one day ( a combination of two parts to make one) they are both considered a day yet we can distinguish them as different phases. Gen. 2:24 Adam and Eve become one flesh (Here two personalities who come together in marriage and are one, not one person but in unity. God sees them as one even though they are not physically fused together like Siamese twins. If we take the Oneness view this would be the only consideration for our understanding. Gen.11:6 the people are one Ezra 2:64 the whole assembly of Israel is like one. Num. 13:23 according to their view When the spies went over into the land of Canaan they brought back one grape (Heb. eschal echad.) Thats one big grap ! Can anyone actually think it was a numerical statement. It means a cluster of grapes. Ps.133:1 the brethren is to dwell as one ( in unity) 1 Sam.3:17 they are called one company 2 Sam. 2:25 one troop 1 kings 7:42 one tribe 1 Kings 11:13 Israel is called one nation. Ez. 37:17 Ezekial is told to put two sticks together and combined they become one stick. Showing the nation would be unified. In all these examples can anyone find them to be a strict singular meaning ? This same word is applied to the one God and is clearly used as a compound unity. You can twist and turn at the truth of the matter , you can be uncomfortable in its teaching but you can’t remove its consistent usage in the scripture. The word for a strict single is yachid it is used in Gen.22:2 "Take thy one and only son." This can also be used for Gods only son being unique and one of a kind. PLURAL STATEMENTS OF GOD IN THE N.T Vs.20 "I am in my Father and you are in me and I in you in vs.23 he speaks in a plural ... and we will come to him and make our home with him. Is the humanity of Christ going to make its home in us! This is one of the few times Jesus speaks in a plural context to explain his unity with both the Father and the Holy Spirit. Essentially the word one is describing the being of God while we have other statements that describe the persons of God (not human persons but distinct identities). There is not conflict unless someone disregards one or the other. Jn.17:21 Jesus prays that they all may be one, as you Father are in me , and I in you , that they also may be one in us." In the New Testament there is a Greek equivalent to the Hebrew word for one. In Mt.19:5 Jesus quotes Gen.2:24 about a husband and wife becoming one flesh; the word used is hen. Jesus prays that as believers we will be one even as ( Gr. kathos; according as, just as, even as) he and the Father are one. He did not mean our persons would be fused together, it means spiritually united. The God of the Old Testament is a united one. The God of the New Testament is a united one. This is what is meant by God being one. Jn.10:30 "I and my Father are one," this is not numerical; Jesus is not saying he is the Father. They are not one person, but in nature they are unified. It actually reads "we are one" in Greek the first person plural esmen means‘ we are.’ Again this is a unity in nature not a numerical statement The word one in Greek is Hen and it is a neuter nominative so it refers to one in essence and nature, and kind. That he is deity just as the Father is. He went on to explain he is the Son of God and the Pharisees understood his claim of making himself out to be equal with the Father. Eph. 2:18 " Through Christ we both have access to the Father, by one Spirit." Here we have three distinct persons involved in our relationship to God. Christ the person (God/man) has made it possible, the Spirit who is the means of access and the Father who is the object. The scripture uses "we" both in relation to the Jews and gentiles, two people groups. These same words are used also of the Son and the Father showing they are two different persons. 2 Cor. 13:14 "May the grace of the Lord Jesus Christ, and the love of God, and the fellowship of the Holy Spirit be with you all". Here again are all three mentioned why make distinctions if they are all the same person. There are numerous illustrations in the O.T. of the three being one. For example there is a tradition even today as the Jew’s say the S’hma Deut.6:4 it is broken up into three segments each repeated three times while the last word one is said only once, indicating unity. Isaiah when he saw the Lord in his temple Isa.6 said, "holy, holy, holy,". Also in Rev. 4:8 it describes the angels saying it thrice day and night, showing it is a set pattern in heaven where God dwells. Yet more times than not God is represented as the Holy one of Israel. In Numbers 6:24 we find a thrice fold blessing with the title Lord. Num 6:24-27 "The LORD bless you and keep you; the LORD make His face shine upon you, and be gracious to you; the LORD lift up His countenance upon you, and give you peace." "So they shall put My name on the children of Israel, and I will bless them." In like manner 2 Cor.13:14 states" The grace of the Lord Jesus, and the love of God and the communion of the Holy Spirit be with you all." Here we see all three mentioned as a unit. While this cannot emphatically prove tri-unity it does show there was this concept that is not foreign to the scriptures.
Thank God for Pastor Jennings! I had been waiting a while for the chance to get baptized. Finally got baptized yesterday in Montgomery, Alabama. Hallelujah 🎉
1. Where in the Scripture does it say that God is unitarian? (or that God exist as one Person?) If God is unitarian, how do you explain passages such as Genesis 19:24 where Yahweh (“LORD”), rained brimstone and fire from the Yahweh out of heaven? If God is unitarian, why are there so many plural descriptions in the OT (viz. plural nouns, adjectives, and verbs) to describe God? If God is unitarian, why is it that there are so many places in the Bible where the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are clearly distinguished from each other in the same verse? If Jesus is the Father, why is it that Jesus is explicitly referred to as “the Son” over two hundred times in the New Testament, and never once is he called “Father? If the “Son” has not eternally existed with (personally distinct from) the Father why then is the Son presented as the Agent of creation, that is, the Creator? (for in Oneness theology only Jesus as the “Father” mode existed prior to Bethlehem). If the Son did not eternally exist with the Father as a distinct Person why is it that the “Son” can say, “Now, Father, glorify Me together with Yourself, with the glory which I had [eichon, or “shared”] with You before the world was” (emphasis added)? Thus, how did the Son have (literally, actively “possessed”) glory with (para) the Father before time if the Son did not exist before Bethlehem? If the Son did not eternally exist with the Father as a distinct Person why is it that the “Son” is said to be “sent” from the Father “out of heaven”? If Oneness doctrine is biblically true, why then do the biblical authors use grammatical features that personally distinguish between the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit? If Oneness doctrine (or Modalism) is the so-called doctrine of the apostles, then, why was it universally condemned as *heretical* by the early church Fathers (some of who were disciples of the original apostles) and condemned by all the important church councils and creeds?
I am now Tarrying for the Holy Ghost it's tough but I'm selfish for my Lord and I want him for myself so I stand longer shout louder and more over more and more each day I keep going back everyday until he moves on me, he quicken my spirit and changed it for that time but I haven't received it yet so please pray that I recieve the Holy Ghost. And I will pray for you bretheren that it falls upon you as you pray and tarry for it
I come into agreement with you. For the vision is yet for an appointed time, but at the end it shall speak, and not lie: though it tarry, wait for it; because it will surely come, it will not tarry. Habakkuk 2:3. God is not a man to lie, and His word does not return vioded. Be kind, loving, obedient and patient as you wait. Do not allow yourself to grow weary while awaiting your blessing. May this season be one you gain more insight and knowledge of love your heavenly Father has for you. In Jesus Christ name I ask and pray, Amen
baptism dont save you friend, and if you follow gino youre following oneness/modalism, a cult condemned heretical by the early church. pm me- you recieve the HG when you accept Jesus' Blood sacrifice sister.
I truly like this Pastor and the teaching of scriptures there is a man of truthfulness as I see him only As a man of integrity continue this hard hitting journey.
Glory to the Father! Wonderful message as always! Love and greetings from New Zealand pastor Jennings and all brethrens of the TOG all over the world ❤🙏
Food for the soul, we can only say thank you God. Zambia is watching and have continued gathering since we received the baptism in the name of Jesus Christ last year August. We will hold fast to the truth of God, pray for our growth brothers and sisters.
Greetings everyone, I don’t usually comment on videos but I truly thank God for showing me the Truth and what God has done and continue to do in my life! I’ve been following the Truth of God for 10 months now. I remember when I was struggling with smoking weed but one day I started rolling up my weed to smoke and as I started smoking while listening to Pastor Jennings and I felt very convicted that day and started crying midway through my smoke session and threw away the weed and never touched it again. I got baptized 07/01/22 and my life has completely changed ever since I’ve been being obedient to the Word of God. Please keep me in pray as I do for y’all!!
Thanks be to God for shining His light on us through the way you break down scripture, every time I listen to any of your teaching I just marvel, I have never seen or heard this before and I thank God for this revelation, may the Lord help me to obey Him
TONGUES AND BAPTISM FOR SALVATION If we are saved before baptism by faith then baptism cannot convey to us the Spirit no matter what name is said over a person. If you are saved by baptism, (by calling on Jesus name) then it was not faith that saved but an ordinance you had faith in. If it was at your baptism you had called on him for the first time to save you this would not make sense, since it is our response to the gospel message by faith that saves. Oneness Pentecostals (a separate group of Pentecostals) teach that "speaking in tongues" must accompany the conversion of all Christians to prove they have the Spirit. The process to salvation is repentance, faith, baptism in Jesus name, then comes the waiting for the Acts 2 experience. Either before or after is obedience to commands and works. The Oneness Pentecostals make tongues as the proof that one possesses salvation. Many wait for this evidence to occur and when it does not they look desperately to find whatever flaw or sin is holding back His Spirit from coming. I can’t think of something more disheartening than to think your not saved because you haven’t had this experience of tongues. John the Baptist never spoke another tongue yet he was filled with the spirit from his mothers womb. The book of Acts gives us the normal pattern for receiving the Holy Spirit. One thing becomes clear as the texts are looked at carefully, there is no consistent pattern of reception. In order for something to be normative it needs to be consistent and a common thing to all, clearly it is not as proposed by the Oneness view. If we look carefully through the book of Acts There are only three references to believers speaking in tongues when salvation was given. Acts 2 those in the upper room who did not know what they were waiting for, Acts 10 the spirit falls on them while the message is given and they speak to give evidence to Peter that the gentiles are allowed to enter the Church. And Acts 19 The order for the Jews in Acts 2 was vs.38 repent,vs.41 they gladly received the word then they were baptized publicly in a Christian baptism and received the spirit of promise. Which was the same promise given to the apostles by Jesus in Acts 1:5. The unbelieving Jews were witnesses to God beginning a new entity the Church. Acts 8 for the Samaritans the order was they believed and were baptized vs.12-17 then they had the apostles lay hands on them and received the Holy Spirit Acts 10 the gentiles order was as he was speaking the Holy Spirit was given because of their faith that God saw in their hearts vs.44-48 then they were baptized. so we can see each time a different way in which the spirit was given. Acts 10 opposes the view of having to be baptized first to receive the Spirit as Oneness claims. Are we to believe God poured out his Spirit in the same way as Pentecost on people whose sins were not yet forgiven? Clearly the Spirit is given by grace. However we find their was a common denominator, they were all saved the same way. By faith Lets take a journey through the book of Acts and see what transpired in each instance of salvation. Did all speak in tongues were all baptized (in Jesus name) to receive the spirit. What we find will be very productive in understanding the truth. Acts 2 Death and resurrection are proclaimed 3,000 are saved. as Jews they publicly declare their allegiance to Christ by being baptized and receive the spirit. No tongues for the 3,000.This is important in that so many make tongues the required manifestation to show they were saved. Nowhere does anyone refer to Acts 2 as the model for each time a group or people were saved. Only in Acts 11 does Peter recall what happened to them in the upper room. Acts 3:18-19 Christ’s death and repentance is the focus for the forgiveness of their sins. In Acts 4:2-4 Jesus & the resurrection is preached, not baptism & again they believed the word & 5,000 were saved. There was no tongues , and no baptism mentioned. Acts 4:31 tells us they spoke the word boldly when they were filled with the spirit. no tongues, and no baptism mentioned Acts 8:17 Peter and John come to the Samaritans who had already received the word of God & were baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus and still did not have the spirit. ( Peter needed to be there, he was present for all three groups : Jews, Samaritans and Gentiles) there were no tongues. Acts 8:37-38 After hearing Isa.53 which is about the death of Jesus he asks to be baptized, Philip reply’s if you believe with all your heart. He confesses Jesus is the son of God. no tongues (maybe he did maybe he didn't.) Acts 9:17-18 when Paul received salvation he did not speak in tongues until later, yet no one would contest he was saved. When he gives his testimony he refers back to the Damascus road encounter as the time of his Spiritual birth. In vs. 17 it tells us when Ananias laid hands on him he was filled with the Spirit then he was baptized. (1Cor.15:18, Gal.1:12) He later does speak in tongues as probably all the apostles did. Acts 10:43 Peter says "To him give all the prophets witness, that through his name whosoever believeth in him shall receive remission of sins. We have the exact reversal of Acts 2 ,they then received the Spirit from hearing the word & believing, before any baptism. The gentiles speak in tongues as proof of their salvation to some of the unbelieving Jews present who refused to believe they could be partakers of salvation. If no Jews were there would not have been necessary for this sign gift to be manifested. vs.48 they were commanded to be baptized in the name of the Lord. Acts 11:16-18 Peter recounts the Lord saying about the difference between water baptism and spirit baptism. Vs 17" if therefore God gave them the same gift as he did unto us, when we believed on the Lord Jesus Christ;" Acts 15 the Jerusalem council was called because some men said that certain parts of the law needed to be obeyed. Vs 8 Peter recounts how the gentiles heard the word of the gospel and believed, God seeing their hearts acknowledged them by giving them the H. Spirit just as he did us. And making no distinction between us & them, purifying their hearts by faith vs.11" We believe that through the grace of the Lord Jesus we shall be saved in the same manner". Notice that Peter makes it clear its by grace and that the gentiles were actually saved being baptized in the Spirit before any confession or baptism. (1 Cor.12:13) Everyone enters into Christ the same way then and today.Eph.1:13 tells us when they believed in the gospel (1 Cor.15:1-4) they were sealed by the Holy Spirit. Acts 16:31 the Philipian jailer asks what must I do to be saved ? answer believe on the Lord Jesus Christ and you will be saved, you & your household. then they spoke the word of the Lord to both him & his household. No tongues, no baptism until later What we find in the book of Acts is no set formulae for the giving of the Spirit. What was required in all the accounts was faith. Tongues were not present except in a few instances. Acts 19 vs.5 they were baptized in the name of the Lord. Jews who only received Johns baptism had not heard of Christ’s death and resurrection nor Pentecost. It is Paul who initiates the conversation on the Holy Spirit. He finds that they are not disciples of Christ but of John, years after they had not heard that the one John was pointing to had already come. After receiving the Gospel they are baptized Paul lays hands on them the Holy Spirit comes upon them and they speak in tongues and prophecy. They did not seek after the Spirit as the Oneness Pentecostals are told, it was a natural occurrence. Not one instance do we see anyone laboring for the Spirit. Why was the Spirit given after Paul laid hands on them. It was to illustrate that they were no longer to follow John the Baptizer but the apostles who now had the leadership role for Israel. The Church with the apostles as their leaders replaced the Sanhedrin and Pharisees and even John. In each case when tongues are manifested there are Jews present (sometimes in unbelief). The conclusion can only be that that tongues were given primarily as a sign to unbelieving Jews or to those new people groups entering the body. As with Acts 10 they were in unbelief that the gentiles could be saved and so God gave them the Holy Spirit and as proof gave them languages unlearned for evidence to those present. Their conclusion was that they received what they had at Pentecost. In Acts 19 The unbelieving Jews that were only water baptized spoke in tongues was proof to them that Jesus died and resurrected and the Holy Spirit had come. Tongues is neither the initial evidence of their salvation anymore than prophecy would be. If we take the Oneness Pentecostal attitude to its conclusion …then one must have hands laid on them to receive the spirit and that they must be in groups of twelve to thousands like the other occurrences with tongues instead of single persons. One might even add that fire should appear over their heads as it did at Pentecost. People try to insert other incidents but they are all arguments from silence and are not Scripturally consistent or verifiable . Acts 26:18 "that they may receive forgiveness of sins, and inheritance among them which are sanctified by faith that is in me. that is in Jesus Christ. The majority of teaching of how to be spiritually born is by faith. The order today is faith, the receiving of the Holy Spirit and our response in baptism. So with a handful of scripture on baptism with over 240 on faith and believe, not including those about Christ’s death we can see how important it is to rightly divide the word. Is tongues necessary for salvation? No! otherwise we will have to eliminate most of the salvation’s in the book of Acts. It is an evidence but not THE evidence for all.
THE WORD ONE Both Trinitarians and Oneness believe there is one God. But it is how we define it that makes the difference. The Oneness teaching takes all the Scriptures that say God is one and purposely ignore the statements of Jesus and the gospel writers that speak of two or three persons of the Godhead. In the Old Testament teachings were focused on God being one in contrast to the polytheism of the nations that surrounded Israel. There are statements that speak of the plurality of this ONE God in the Old Testament record. However, it is only when we come to the New Testament that this one in unity is explained. Bernard writes that the word apparently can mean both one in unity and one numerically for Strong's defines it as "united, one, first." He then gives just a few examples to prove that we should choose its meaning to be an absolute one.(Oneness of God, pp.152-153) Bernard finds a few examples contrary to the plural meaning which in no way is exhaustive. However the context determines the meaning. In the Old Testament God is described as one. Duet.6:4 says, "Hear, O Israel: LORD our God is one: what Oneness does is camp on this passage, milking it till the cows come home. The phrase "one Lord" is preceded in the Hebrew by elohenu; it is our God is one. The word for one is not a numerical one but is actually a united one. The Hebrew word for one is echad, which comes from the root word achad, which means to unify or collect together (the intensive reflexive form signifying to unite). If this was meant to be a strict numerical statement the Holy Spirit would have had Moses use the word yachid, which means a absolute one, single, only one. Yachid is used twelve times in the Scriptures NOT ONCE is it used for Jehovah God. Despite all the explanations we can see they fail in light of the consistent usage of the word one throughout. The Bible defines how the word one is used. Gen.1:5 evening and morning are called one day ( a combination of two parts to make one) they are both considered a day yet we can distinguish them as different phases. Gen. 2:24 Adam and Eve become one flesh (Here two personalities who come together in marriage and are one, not one person but in unity. God sees them as one even though they are not physically fused together like Siamese twins. If we take the Oneness view this would be the only consideration for our understanding. Gen.11:6 the people are one Ezra 2:64 the whole assembly of Israel is like one. Num. 13:23 according to their view When the spies went over into the land of Canaan they brought back one grape (Heb. eschal echad.) Thats one big grap ! Can anyone actually think it was a numerical statement. It means a cluster of grapes. Ps.133:1 the brethren is to dwell as one ( in unity) 1 Sam.3:17 they are called one company 2 Sam. 2:25 one troop 1 kings 7:42 one tribe 1 Kings 11:13 Israel is called one nation. Ez. 37:17 Ezekial is told to put two sticks together and combined they become one stick. Showing the nation would be unified. In all these examples can anyone find them to be a strict singular meaning ? This same word is applied to the one God and is clearly used as a compound unity. You can twist and turn at the truth of the matter , you can be uncomfortable in its teaching but you can’t remove its consistent usage in the scripture. The word for a strict single is yachid it is used in Gen.22:2 "Take thy one and only son." This can also be used for Gods only son being unique and one of a kind. PLURAL STATEMENTS OF GOD IN THE N.T Vs.20 "I am in my Father and you are in me and I in you in vs.23 he speaks in a plural ... and we will come to him and make our home with him. Is the humanity of Christ going to make its home in us! This is one of the few times Jesus speaks in a plural context to explain his unity with both the Father and the Holy Spirit. Essentially the word one is describing the being of God while we have other statements that describe the persons of God (not human persons but distinct identities). There is not conflict unless someone disregards one or the other. Jn.17:21 Jesus prays that they all may be one, as you Father are in me , and I in you , that they also may be one in us." In the New Testament there is a Greek equivalent to the Hebrew word for one. In Mt.19:5 Jesus quotes Gen.2:24 about a husband and wife becoming one flesh; the word used is hen. Jesus prays that as believers we will be one even as ( Gr. kathos; according as, just as, even as) he and the Father are one. He did not mean our persons would be fused together, it means spiritually united. The God of the Old Testament is a united one. The God of the New Testament is a united one. This is what is meant by God being one. Jn.10:30 "I and my Father are one," this is not numerical; Jesus is not saying he is the Father. They are not one person, but in nature they are unified. It actually reads "we are one" in Greek the first person plural esmen means‘ we are.’ Again this is a unity in nature not a numerical statement The word one in Greek is Hen and it is a neuter nominative so it refers to one in essence and nature, and kind. That he is deity just as the Father is. He went on to explain he is the Son of God and the Pharisees understood his claim of making himself out to be equal with the Father. Eph. 2:18 " Through Christ we both have access to the Father, by one Spirit." Here we have three distinct persons involved in our relationship to God. Christ the person (God/man) has made it possible, the Spirit who is the means of access and the Father who is the object. The scripture uses "we" both in relation to the Jews and gentiles, two people groups. These same words are used also of the Son and the Father showing they are two different persons. 2 Cor. 13:14 "May the grace of the Lord Jesus Christ, and the love of God, and the fellowship of the Holy Spirit be with you all". Here again are all three mentioned why make distinctions if they are all the same person. There are numerous illustrations in the O.T. of the three being one. For example there is a tradition even today as the Jew’s say the S’hma Deut.6:4 it is broken up into three segments each repeated three times while the last word one is said only once, indicating unity. Isaiah when he saw the Lord in his temple Isa.6 said, "holy, holy, holy,". Also in Rev. 4:8 it describes the angels saying it thrice day and night, showing it is a set pattern in heaven where God dwells. Yet more times than not God is represented as the Holy one of Israel. In Numbers 6:24 we find a thrice fold blessing with the title Lord. Num 6:24-27 "The LORD bless you and keep you; the LORD make His face shine upon you, and be gracious to you; the LORD lift up His countenance upon you, and give you peace." "So they shall put My name on the children of Israel, and I will bless them." In like manner 2 Cor.13:14 states" The grace of the Lord Jesus, and the love of God and the communion of the Holy Spirit be with you all." Here we see all three mentioned as a unit. While this cannot emphatically prove tri-unity it does show there was this concept that is not foreign to the scriptures.
Yes, no religion is spared by the 🌈 community & the devil is behind it all! All praises to the almighty GOD who is able! Thank you LORZ for everything 🥺 😌🙏🏽
I just love listening to the Apostle Jennings .I stumbled across this channel in 2020 during the covid lockdown and don't want to miss any of his preaching which is the truth and just plain so everyone can get the message.May God Almighty bless his labour and sacrifices. Im from CapeTown South Africa God bless you all
He’s an apostle not a prophet those are 2 different offices. Ephesians 4:11 read it and God set some in the body , He gave Apostles, prophets, Evangelist, pastors and teachers all different offices Apostles and prophets must work hand and hand because the church was built upon the apostles and prophets through Jesus Christ
What a wonderful and powerful holy message that the holy spirit manifested thur the Apostle Gino Jennings may the Lord keep blessing the TOG congregation and all who believe in the living word of GOD 🙏🙏 please come to Denver Colorado
This man is really getting his messages from the third heavens with my God what a message? he that has an ear to hear let him hear, God's riches blessings upon you and your family Apostle Jennings.🇯🇲🇯🇲🇯🇲👋
You mean he’s getting his message from Jesus Christ himself, through the WORD. I wasn’t aware that the third heaven gives out message. If you can send a scripture, then I’d be happy to gladly read it to be edified.
TONGUES AND BAPTISM FOR SALVATION If we are saved before baptism by faith then baptism cannot convey to us the Spirit no matter what name is said over a person. If you are saved by baptism, (by calling on Jesus name) then it was not faith that saved but an ordinance you had faith in. If it was at your baptism you had called on him for the first time to save you this would not make sense, since it is our response to the gospel message by faith that saves. Oneness Pentecostals (a separate group of Pentecostals) teach that "speaking in tongues" must accompany the conversion of all Christians to prove they have the Spirit. The process to salvation is repentance, faith, baptism in Jesus name, then comes the waiting for the Acts 2 experience. Either before or after is obedience to commands and works. The Oneness Pentecostals make tongues as the proof that one possesses salvation. Many wait for this evidence to occur and when it does not they look desperately to find whatever flaw or sin is holding back His Spirit from coming. I can’t think of something more disheartening than to think your not saved because you haven’t had this experience of tongues. John the Baptist never spoke another tongue yet he was filled with the spirit from his mothers womb. The book of Acts gives us the normal pattern for receiving the Holy Spirit. One thing becomes clear as the texts are looked at carefully, there is no consistent pattern of reception. In order for something to be normative it needs to be consistent and a common thing to all, clearly it is not as proposed by the Oneness view. If we look carefully through the book of Acts There are only three references to believers speaking in tongues when salvation was given. Acts 2 those in the upper room who did not know what they were waiting for, Acts 10 the spirit falls on them while the message is given and they speak to give evidence to Peter that the gentiles are allowed to enter the Church. And Acts 19 The order for the Jews in Acts 2 was vs.38 repent,vs.41 they gladly received the word then they were baptized publicly in a Christian baptism and received the spirit of promise. Which was the same promise given to the apostles by Jesus in Acts 1:5. The unbelieving Jews were witnesses to God beginning a new entity the Church. Acts 8 for the Samaritans the order was they believed and were baptized vs.12-17 then they had the apostles lay hands on them and received the Holy Spirit Acts 10 the gentiles order was as he was speaking the Holy Spirit was given because of their faith that God saw in their hearts vs.44-48 then they were baptized. so we can see each time a different way in which the spirit was given. Acts 10 opposes the view of having to be baptized first to receive the Spirit as Oneness claims. Are we to believe God poured out his Spirit in the same way as Pentecost on people whose sins were not yet forgiven? Clearly the Spirit is given by grace. However we find their was a common denominator, they were all saved the same way. By faith Lets take a journey through the book of Acts and see what transpired in each instance of salvation. Did all speak in tongues were all baptized (in Jesus name) to receive the spirit. What we find will be very productive in understanding the truth. Acts 2 Death and resurrection are proclaimed 3,000 are saved. as Jews they publicly declare their allegiance to Christ by being baptized and receive the spirit. No tongues for the 3,000.This is important in that so many make tongues the required manifestation to show they were saved. Nowhere does anyone refer to Acts 2 as the model for each time a group or people were saved. Only in Acts 11 does Peter recall what happened to them in the upper room. Acts 3:18-19 Christ’s death and repentance is the focus for the forgiveness of their sins. In Acts 4:2-4 Jesus & the resurrection is preached, not baptism & again they believed the word & 5,000 were saved. There was no tongues , and no baptism mentioned. Acts 4:31 tells us they spoke the word boldly when they were filled with the spirit. no tongues, and no baptism mentioned Acts 8:17 Peter and John come to the Samaritans who had already received the word of God & were baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus and still did not have the spirit. ( Peter needed to be there, he was present for all three groups : Jews, Samaritans and Gentiles) there were no tongues. Acts 8:37-38 After hearing Isa.53 which is about the death of Jesus he asks to be baptized, Philip reply’s if you believe with all your heart. He confesses Jesus is the son of God. no tongues (maybe he did maybe he didn't.) Acts 9:17-18 when Paul received salvation he did not speak in tongues until later, yet no one would contest he was saved. When he gives his testimony he refers back to the Damascus road encounter as the time of his Spiritual birth. In vs. 17 it tells us when Ananias laid hands on him he was filled with the Spirit then he was baptized. (1Cor.15:18, Gal.1:12) He later does speak in tongues as probably all the apostles did. Acts 10:43 Peter says "To him give all the prophets witness, that through his name whosoever believeth in him shall receive remission of sins. We have the exact reversal of Acts 2 ,they then received the Spirit from hearing the word & believing, before any baptism. The gentiles speak in tongues as proof of their salvation to some of the unbelieving Jews present who refused to believe they could be partakers of salvation. If no Jews were there would not have been necessary for this sign gift to be manifested. vs.48 they were commanded to be baptized in the name of the Lord. Acts 11:16-18 Peter recounts the Lord saying about the difference between water baptism and spirit baptism. Vs 17" if therefore God gave them the same gift as he did unto us, when we believed on the Lord Jesus Christ;" Acts 15 the Jerusalem council was called because some men said that certain parts of the law needed to be obeyed. Vs 8 Peter recounts how the gentiles heard the word of the gospel and believed, God seeing their hearts acknowledged them by giving them the H. Spirit just as he did us. And making no distinction between us & them, purifying their hearts by faith vs.11" We believe that through the grace of the Lord Jesus we shall be saved in the same manner". Notice that Peter makes it clear its by grace and that the gentiles were actually saved being baptized in the Spirit before any confession or baptism. (1 Cor.12:13) Everyone enters into Christ the same way then and today.Eph.1:13 tells us when they believed in the gospel (1 Cor.15:1-4) they were sealed by the Holy Spirit. Acts 16:31 the Philipian jailer asks what must I do to be saved ? answer believe on the Lord Jesus Christ and you will be saved, you & your household. then they spoke the word of the Lord to both him & his household. No tongues, no baptism until later What we find in the book of Acts is no set formulae for the giving of the Spirit. What was required in all the accounts was faith. Tongues were not present except in a few instances. Acts 19 vs.5 they were baptized in the name of the Lord. Jews who only received Johns baptism had not heard of Christ’s death and resurrection nor Pentecost. It is Paul who initiates the conversation on the Holy Spirit. He finds that they are not disciples of Christ but of John, years after they had not heard that the one John was pointing to had already come. After receiving the Gospel they are baptized Paul lays hands on them the Holy Spirit comes upon them and they speak in tongues and prophecy. They did not seek after the Spirit as the Oneness Pentecostals are told, it was a natural occurrence. Not one instance do we see anyone laboring for the Spirit. Why was the Spirit given after Paul laid hands on them. It was to illustrate that they were no longer to follow John the Baptizer but the apostles who now had the leadership role for Israel. The Church with the apostles as their leaders replaced the Sanhedrin and Pharisees and even John. In each case when tongues are manifested there are Jews present (sometimes in unbelief). The conclusion can only be that that tongues were given primarily as a sign to unbelieving Jews or to those new people groups entering the body. As with Acts 10 they were in unbelief that the gentiles could be saved and so God gave them the Holy Spirit and as proof gave them languages unlearned for evidence to those present. Their conclusion was that they received what they had at Pentecost. In Acts 19 The unbelieving Jews that were only water baptized spoke in tongues was proof to them that Jesus died and resurrected and the Holy Spirit had come. Tongues is neither the initial evidence of their salvation anymore than prophecy would be. If we take the Oneness Pentecostal attitude to its conclusion …then one must have hands laid on them to receive the spirit and that they must be in groups of twelve to thousands like the other occurrences with tongues instead of single persons. One might even add that fire should appear over their heads as it did at Pentecost. People try to insert other incidents but they are all arguments from silence and are not Scripturally consistent or verifiable . Acts 26:18 "that they may receive forgiveness of sins, and inheritance among them which are sanctified by faith that is in me. that is in Jesus Christ. The majority of teaching of how to be spiritually born is by faith. The order today is faith, the receiving of the Holy Spirit and our response in baptism. So with a handful of scripture on baptism with over 240 on faith and believe, not including those about Christ’s death we can see how important it is to rightly divide the word. Is tongues necessary for salvation? No! otherwise we will have to eliminate most of the salvation’s in the book of Acts. It is an evidence but not THE evidence for all.
Appreciative for one more day of hearing the Lord’s Word. Saints, please keep Apostle Pastor Jennings, Minister Williams and all of the TOG Ministry in your prayers. May the Lord bless and keep all who have died in this life for the Lord. Peace unto all.
I love seeing all the Men and boys attending learning how to really Act like A Man especially in knowing how to treat his wife and That's with Love and Affection.
TONGUES AND BAPTISM FOR SALVATION If we are saved before baptism by faith then baptism cannot convey to us the Spirit no matter what name is said over a person. If you are saved by baptism, (by calling on Jesus name) then it was not faith that saved but an ordinance you had faith in. If it was at your baptism you had called on him for the first time to save you this would not make sense, since it is our response to the gospel message by faith that saves. Oneness Pentecostals (a separate group of Pentecostals) teach that "speaking in tongues" must accompany the conversion of all Christians to prove they have the Spirit. The process to salvation is repentance, faith, baptism in Jesus name, then comes the waiting for the Acts 2 experience. Either before or after is obedience to commands and works. The Oneness Pentecostals make tongues as the proof that one possesses salvation. Many wait for this evidence to occur and when it does not they look desperately to find whatever flaw or sin is holding back His Spirit from coming. I can’t think of something more disheartening than to think your not saved because you haven’t had this experience of tongues. John the Baptist never spoke another tongue yet he was filled with the spirit from his mothers womb. The book of Acts gives us the normal pattern for receiving the Holy Spirit. One thing becomes clear as the texts are looked at carefully, there is no consistent pattern of reception. In order for something to be normative it needs to be consistent and a common thing to all, clearly it is not as proposed by the Oneness view. If we look carefully through the book of Acts There are only three references to believers speaking in tongues when salvation was given. Acts 2 those in the upper room who did not know what they were waiting for, Acts 10 the spirit falls on them while the message is given and they speak to give evidence to Peter that the gentiles are allowed to enter the Church. And Acts 19 The order for the Jews in Acts 2 was vs.38 repent,vs.41 they gladly received the word then they were baptized publicly in a Christian baptism and received the spirit of promise. Which was the same promise given to the apostles by Jesus in Acts 1:5. The unbelieving Jews were witnesses to God beginning a new entity the Church. Acts 8 for the Samaritans the order was they believed and were baptized vs.12-17 then they had the apostles lay hands on them and received the Holy Spirit Acts 10 the gentiles order was as he was speaking the Holy Spirit was given because of their faith that God saw in their hearts vs.44-48 then they were baptized. so we can see each time a different way in which the spirit was given. Acts 10 opposes the view of having to be baptized first to receive the Spirit as Oneness claims. Are we to believe God poured out his Spirit in the same way as Pentecost on people whose sins were not yet forgiven? Clearly the Spirit is given by grace. However we find their was a common denominator, they were all saved the same way. By faith Lets take a journey through the book of Acts and see what transpired in each instance of salvation. Did all speak in tongues were all baptized (in Jesus name) to receive the spirit. What we find will be very productive in understanding the truth. Acts 2 Death and resurrection are proclaimed 3,000 are saved. as Jews they publicly declare their allegiance to Christ by being baptized and receive the spirit. No tongues for the 3,000.This is important in that so many make tongues the required manifestation to show they were saved. Nowhere does anyone refer to Acts 2 as the model for each time a group or people were saved. Only in Acts 11 does Peter recall what happened to them in the upper room. Acts 3:18-19 Christ’s death and repentance is the focus for the forgiveness of their sins. In Acts 4:2-4 Jesus & the resurrection is preached, not baptism & again they believed the word & 5,000 were saved. There was no tongues , and no baptism mentioned. Acts 4:31 tells us they spoke the word boldly when they were filled with the spirit. no tongues, and no baptism mentioned Acts 8:17 Peter and John come to the Samaritans who had already received the word of God & were baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus and still did not have the spirit. ( Peter needed to be there, he was present for all three groups : Jews, Samaritans and Gentiles) there were no tongues. Acts 8:37-38 After hearing Isa.53 which is about the death of Jesus he asks to be baptized, Philip reply’s if you believe with all your heart. He confesses Jesus is the son of God. no tongues (maybe he did maybe he didn't.) Acts 9:17-18 when Paul received salvation he did not speak in tongues until later, yet no one would contest he was saved. When he gives his testimony he refers back to the Damascus road encounter as the time of his Spiritual birth. In vs. 17 it tells us when Ananias laid hands on him he was filled with the Spirit then he was baptized. (1Cor.15:18, Gal.1:12) He later does speak in tongues as probably all the apostles did. Acts 10:43 Peter says "To him give all the prophets witness, that through his name whosoever believeth in him shall receive remission of sins. We have the exact reversal of Acts 2 ,they then received the Spirit from hearing the word & believing, before any baptism. The gentiles speak in tongues as proof of their salvation to some of the unbelieving Jews present who refused to believe they could be partakers of salvation. If no Jews were there would not have been necessary for this sign gift to be manifested. vs.48 they were commanded to be baptized in the name of the Lord. Acts 11:16-18 Peter recounts the Lord saying about the difference between water baptism and spirit baptism. Vs 17" if therefore God gave them the same gift as he did unto us, when we believed on the Lord Jesus Christ;" Acts 15 the Jerusalem council was called because some men said that certain parts of the law needed to be obeyed. Vs 8 Peter recounts how the gentiles heard the word of the gospel and believed, God seeing their hearts acknowledged them by giving them the H. Spirit just as he did us. And making no distinction between us & them, purifying their hearts by faith vs.11" We believe that through the grace of the Lord Jesus we shall be saved in the same manner". Notice that Peter makes it clear its by grace and that the gentiles were actually saved being baptized in the Spirit before any confession or baptism. (1 Cor.12:13) Everyone enters into Christ the same way then and today.Eph.1:13 tells us when they believed in the gospel (1 Cor.15:1-4) they were sealed by the Holy Spirit. Acts 16:31 the Philipian jailer asks what must I do to be saved ? answer believe on the Lord Jesus Christ and you will be saved, you & your household. then they spoke the word of the Lord to both him & his household. No tongues, no baptism until later What we find in the book of Acts is no set formulae for the giving of the Spirit. What was required in all the accounts was faith. Tongues were not present except in a few instances. Acts 19 vs.5 they were baptized in the name of the Lord. Jews who only received Johns baptism had not heard of Christ’s death and resurrection nor Pentecost. It is Paul who initiates the conversation on the Holy Spirit. He finds that they are not disciples of Christ but of John, years after they had not heard that the one John was pointing to had already come. After receiving the Gospel they are baptized Paul lays hands on them the Holy Spirit comes upon them and they speak in tongues and prophecy. They did not seek after the Spirit as the Oneness Pentecostals are told, it was a natural occurrence. Not one instance do we see anyone laboring for the Spirit. Why was the Spirit given after Paul laid hands on them. It was to illustrate that they were no longer to follow John the Baptizer but the apostles who now had the leadership role for Israel. The Church with the apostles as their leaders replaced the Sanhedrin and Pharisees and even John. In each case when tongues are manifested there are Jews present (sometimes in unbelief). The conclusion can only be that that tongues were given primarily as a sign to unbelieving Jews or to those new people groups entering the body. As with Acts 10 they were in unbelief that the gentiles could be saved and so God gave them the Holy Spirit and as proof gave them languages unlearned for evidence to those present. Their conclusion was that they received what they had at Pentecost. In Acts 19 The unbelieving Jews that were only water baptized spoke in tongues was proof to them that Jesus died and resurrected and the Holy Spirit had come. Tongues is neither the initial evidence of their salvation anymore than prophecy would be. If we take the Oneness Pentecostal attitude to its conclusion …then one must have hands laid on them to receive the spirit and that they must be in groups of twelve to thousands like the other occurrences with tongues instead of single persons. One might even add that fire should appear over their heads as it did at Pentecost. People try to insert other incidents but they are all arguments from silence and are not Scripturally consistent or verifiable . Acts 26:18 "that they may receive forgiveness of sins, and inheritance among them which are sanctified by faith that is in me. that is in Jesus Christ. The majority of teaching of how to be spiritually born is by faith. The order today is faith, the receiving of the Holy Spirit and our response in baptism. So with a handful of scripture on baptism with over 240 on faith and believe, not including those about Christ’s death we can see how important it is to rightly divide the word. Is tongues necessary for salvation? No! otherwise we will have to eliminate most of the salvation’s in the book of Acts. It is an evidence but not THE evidence for all.
This is a great message the congregation need to be all on their feet , what are they afraid of , when you know this message is true. That’s why the church is falling for everything. Don’t let fear grip you people
Thank Holy Ghost for you brother Gino, brother Williams, and all the ministers ordained by God!!! This channel has changed my life with God!!! All I can say is thank you Lord Jesus for your Existence!!!
I love the way GOD'S WORD causes that GOOD trouble. Amen Apostle Jennings listen to the ol trouble maker. This message exposes that I'm a big fool acting out through my sick sinful emotions.
TONGUES AND BAPTISM FOR SALVATION If we are saved before baptism by faith then baptism cannot convey to us the Spirit no matter what name is said over a person. If you are saved by baptism, (by calling on Jesus name) then it was not faith that saved but an ordinance you had faith in. If it was at your baptism you had called on him for the first time to save you this would not make sense, since it is our response to the gospel message by faith that saves. Oneness Pentecostals (a separate group of Pentecostals) teach that "speaking in tongues" must accompany the conversion of all Christians to prove they have the Spirit. The process to salvation is repentance, faith, baptism in Jesus name, then comes the waiting for the Acts 2 experience. Either before or after is obedience to commands and works. The Oneness Pentecostals make tongues as the proof that one possesses salvation. Many wait for this evidence to occur and when it does not they look desperately to find whatever flaw or sin is holding back His Spirit from coming. I can’t think of something more disheartening than to think your not saved because you haven’t had this experience of tongues. John the Baptist never spoke another tongue yet he was filled with the spirit from his mothers womb. The book of Acts gives us the normal pattern for receiving the Holy Spirit. One thing becomes clear as the texts are looked at carefully, there is no consistent pattern of reception. In order for something to be normative it needs to be consistent and a common thing to all, clearly it is not as proposed by the Oneness view. If we look carefully through the book of Acts There are only three references to believers speaking in tongues when salvation was given. Acts 2 those in the upper room who did not know what they were waiting for, Acts 10 the spirit falls on them while the message is given and they speak to give evidence to Peter that the gentiles are allowed to enter the Church. And Acts 19 The order for the Jews in Acts 2 was vs.38 repent,vs.41 they gladly received the word then they were baptized publicly in a Christian baptism and received the spirit of promise. Which was the same promise given to the apostles by Jesus in Acts 1:5. The unbelieving Jews were witnesses to God beginning a new entity the Church. Acts 8 for the Samaritans the order was they believed and were baptized vs.12-17 then they had the apostles lay hands on them and received the Holy Spirit Acts 10 the gentiles order was as he was speaking the Holy Spirit was given because of their faith that God saw in their hearts vs.44-48 then they were baptized. so we can see each time a different way in which the spirit was given. Acts 10 opposes the view of having to be baptized first to receive the Spirit as Oneness claims. Are we to believe God poured out his Spirit in the same way as Pentecost on people whose sins were not yet forgiven? Clearly the Spirit is given by grace. However we find their was a common denominator, they were all saved the same way. By faith Lets take a journey through the book of Acts and see what transpired in each instance of salvation. Did all speak in tongues were all baptized (in Jesus name) to receive the spirit. What we find will be very productive in understanding the truth. Acts 2 Death and resurrection are proclaimed 3,000 are saved. as Jews they publicly declare their allegiance to Christ by being baptized and receive the spirit. No tongues for the 3,000.This is important in that so many make tongues the required manifestation to show they were saved. Nowhere does anyone refer to Acts 2 as the model for each time a group or people were saved. Only in Acts 11 does Peter recall what happened to them in the upper room. Acts 3:18-19 Christ’s death and repentance is the focus for the forgiveness of their sins. In Acts 4:2-4 Jesus & the resurrection is preached, not baptism & again they believed the word & 5,000 were saved. There was no tongues , and no baptism mentioned. Acts 4:31 tells us they spoke the word boldly when they were filled with the spirit. no tongues, and no baptism mentioned Acts 8:17 Peter and John come to the Samaritans who had already received the word of God & were baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus and still did not have the spirit. ( Peter needed to be there, he was present for all three groups : Jews, Samaritans and Gentiles) there were no tongues. Acts 8:37-38 After hearing Isa.53 which is about the death of Jesus he asks to be baptized, Philip reply’s if you believe with all your heart. He confesses Jesus is the son of God. no tongues (maybe he did maybe he didn't.) Acts 9:17-18 when Paul received salvation he did not speak in tongues until later, yet no one would contest he was saved. When he gives his testimony he refers back to the Damascus road encounter as the time of his Spiritual birth. In vs. 17 it tells us when Ananias laid hands on him he was filled with the Spirit then he was baptized. (1Cor.15:18, Gal.1:12) He later does speak in tongues as probably all the apostles did. Acts 10:43 Peter says "To him give all the prophets witness, that through his name whosoever believeth in him shall receive remission of sins. We have the exact reversal of Acts 2 ,they then received the Spirit from hearing the word & believing, before any baptism. The gentiles speak in tongues as proof of their salvation to some of the unbelieving Jews present who refused to believe they could be partakers of salvation. If no Jews were there would not have been necessary for this sign gift to be manifested. vs.48 they were commanded to be baptized in the name of the Lord. Acts 11:16-18 Peter recounts the Lord saying about the difference between water baptism and spirit baptism. Vs 17" if therefore God gave them the same gift as he did unto us, when we believed on the Lord Jesus Christ;" Acts 15 the Jerusalem council was called because some men said that certain parts of the law needed to be obeyed. Vs 8 Peter recounts how the gentiles heard the word of the gospel and believed, God seeing their hearts acknowledged them by giving them the H. Spirit just as he did us. And making no distinction between us & them, purifying their hearts by faith vs.11" We believe that through the grace of the Lord Jesus we shall be saved in the same manner". Notice that Peter makes it clear its by grace and that the gentiles were actually saved being baptized in the Spirit before any confession or baptism. (1 Cor.12:13) Everyone enters into Christ the same way then and today.Eph.1:13 tells us when they believed in the gospel (1 Cor.15:1-4) they were sealed by the Holy Spirit. Acts 16:31 the Philipian jailer asks what must I do to be saved ? answer believe on the Lord Jesus Christ and you will be saved, you & your household. then they spoke the word of the Lord to both him & his household. No tongues, no baptism until later What we find in the book of Acts is no set formulae for the giving of the Spirit. What was required in all the accounts was faith. Tongues were not present except in a few instances. Acts 19 vs.5 they were baptized in the name of the Lord. Jews who only received Johns baptism had not heard of Christ’s death and resurrection nor Pentecost. It is Paul who initiates the conversation on the Holy Spirit. He finds that they are not disciples of Christ but of John, years after they had not heard that the one John was pointing to had already come. After receiving the Gospel they are baptized Paul lays hands on them the Holy Spirit comes upon them and they speak in tongues and prophecy. They did not seek after the Spirit as the Oneness Pentecostals are told, it was a natural occurrence. Not one instance do we see anyone laboring for the Spirit. Why was the Spirit given after Paul laid hands on them. It was to illustrate that they were no longer to follow John the Baptizer but the apostles who now had the leadership role for Israel. The Church with the apostles as their leaders replaced the Sanhedrin and Pharisees and even John. In each case when tongues are manifested there are Jews present (sometimes in unbelief). The conclusion can only be that that tongues were given primarily as a sign to unbelieving Jews or to those new people groups entering the body. As with Acts 10 they were in unbelief that the gentiles could be saved and so God gave them the Holy Spirit and as proof gave them languages unlearned for evidence to those present. Their conclusion was that they received what they had at Pentecost. In Acts 19 The unbelieving Jews that were only water baptized spoke in tongues was proof to them that Jesus died and resurrected and the Holy Spirit had come. Tongues is neither the initial evidence of their salvation anymore than prophecy would be. If we take the Oneness Pentecostal attitude to its conclusion …then one must have hands laid on them to receive the spirit and that they must be in groups of twelve to thousands like the other occurrences with tongues instead of single persons. One might even add that fire should appear over their heads as it did at Pentecost. People try to insert other incidents but they are all arguments from silence and are not Scripturally consistent or verifiable . Acts 26:18 "that they may receive forgiveness of sins, and inheritance among them which are sanctified by faith that is in me. that is in Jesus Christ. The majority of teaching of how to be spiritually born is by faith. The order today is faith, the receiving of the Holy Spirit and our response in baptism. So with a handful of scripture on baptism with over 240 on faith and believe, not including those about Christ’s death we can see how important it is to rightly divide the word. Is tongues necessary for salvation? No! otherwise we will have to eliminate most of the salvation’s in the book of Acts. It is an evidence but not THE evidence for all.
Holy God thank you for your mercy grace and unfailingly love ❤️
Amen 🙏🏼 ❤️🔥and thank you Truth of God Church with Pastor Gino Jennings 🙏❤️🔥
This message never gets old brothers and sisters. This message is eternally good. G1
C roc. Even when I'm heading to a fire emergency or a medical emergency. I hav this thing Blasting in my ears. I listen to Pastor Soooo often. I've watched all his videos over and over and over. I Never get tired of it.
Yes brother haha ❤🙏🏽
*ONEMESS APOSTOLIC CATHOLIC GREEK ORTHODOX TAMMUZIAN PENTECOSTAL HOKINESS Huntington Park ghetto-hood religion is another gospel. There is NO SUCH THING as a message of holiness or a crown of holiness for that matter.*
*Did Tony Harvin give you the debate proposition for you to come in the public and defend the THREE CROSSES OF THE ONEMESS APOSTOLIC CATHOLIC GREEK ORTHODOX TAMMUZIAN PENTECOSTAL HOKINESS Huntington Park ghetto-hood religion and the N.5th Street DUNGHILL CAMPUS...*
*By the way CROC, will you be giving an interview to Elder Blake in the UK that recently excommunicated Apostle Gino Jennings?*
I luv ❤️ this church. Pastor Jennings is the real deal....
Amen!!!
x xxxgvggcçgC cxgxxvvxvvvvvvvvvvvxxxxvxxxvxxvvxvcxvxvxvxxcvvnvvññnvññvņtcxt ct5wt6tttt5ttttttttttttwtwtttttttttttttqttttttt3wtttttttttt tt 32:00 twtttt 3 32:00 32:00 twt 32:00 32:00 32:00 32:00 2:00 tt 3 32:00 32:00 32:00 32:00 32:00 tw 32:00 w 32:00 wə 32:00 2:00 4w 32:00 32:00 32:00 w 32:wr 32:00 32:00 32:00 32:00 w00 32:00 4 3 32:00 32:00 32:00 32:00 32:00 t 32:00 32:00 32:00 32:00 2 32:00 32:00 32: 32: 32:00 32:00 32:00 00 32:00 00 :00
Me too❤🙏
Paster Jennings please come to Albany new your
Will you ever come to St.Louis Missouri ?❤ God BLESS YOU 🙌 🙏 ❤️ ✨️
Don't stop praying people!! We must PRAY while you're laughing remind yourself that we must PRAY and FASSST please. We love you APOSTLE Jennings. Keep on keeping on.!! Entire Jennings family is covered and ALL that stand with us!!
John 9:31
?
THE WORD ONE
Both Trinitarians and Oneness believe there is one God. But it is how we define it that makes the difference.
The Oneness teaching takes all the Scriptures that say God is one and purposely ignore the statements of Jesus and the gospel writers that speak of two or three persons of the Godhead. In the Old Testament teachings were focused on God being one in contrast to the polytheism of the nations that surrounded Israel. There are statements that speak of the plurality of this ONE God in the Old Testament record. However, it is only when we come to the New Testament that this one in unity is explained.
Bernard writes that the word apparently can mean both one in unity and one numerically for Strong's defines it as "united, one, first." He then gives just a few examples to prove that we should choose its meaning to be an absolute one.(Oneness of God, pp.152-153) Bernard finds a few examples contrary to the plural meaning which in no way is exhaustive. However the context determines the meaning.
In the Old Testament God is described as one. Duet.6:4 says, "Hear, O Israel: LORD our God is one: what Oneness does is camp on this passage, milking it till the cows come home. The phrase "one Lord" is preceded in the Hebrew by elohenu; it is our God is one. The word for one is not a numerical one but is actually a united one. The Hebrew word for one is echad, which comes from the root word achad, which means to unify or collect together (the intensive reflexive form signifying to unite). If this was meant to be a strict numerical statement the Holy Spirit would have had Moses use the word yachid, which means a absolute one, single, only one. Yachid is used twelve times in the Scriptures NOT ONCE is it used for Jehovah God. Despite all the explanations we can see they fail in light of the consistent usage of the word one throughout.
The Bible defines how the word one is used.
Gen.1:5 evening and morning are called one day ( a combination of two parts to make one) they are both considered a day yet we can distinguish them as different phases.
Gen. 2:24 Adam and Eve become one flesh (Here two personalities who come together in marriage and are one, not one person but in unity. God sees them as one even though they are not physically fused together like Siamese twins. If we take the Oneness view this would be the only consideration for our understanding.
Gen.11:6 the people are one Ezra 2:64 the whole assembly of Israel is like one.
Num. 13:23 according to their view When the spies went over into the land of Canaan they brought back one grape (Heb. eschal echad.) Thats one big grap ! Can anyone actually think it was a numerical statement. It means a cluster of grapes.
Ps.133:1 the brethren is to dwell as one ( in unity) 1 Sam.3:17 they are called one company 2 Sam. 2:25 one troop 1 kings 7:42 one tribe 1 Kings 11:13 Israel is called one nation.
Ez. 37:17 Ezekial is told to put two sticks together and combined they become one stick. Showing the nation would be unified. In all these examples can anyone find them to be a strict singular meaning ? This same word is applied to the one God and is clearly used as a compound unity. You can twist and turn at the truth of the matter , you can be uncomfortable in its teaching but you can’t remove its consistent usage in the scripture.
The word for a strict single is yachid it is used in Gen.22:2 "Take thy one and only son." This can also be used for Gods only son being unique and one of a kind.
PLURAL STATEMENTS OF GOD IN THE N.T
Vs.20 "I am in my Father and you are in me and I in you in vs.23 he speaks in a plural ... and we will come to him and make our home with him. Is the humanity of Christ going to make its home in us! This is one of the few times Jesus speaks in a plural context to explain his unity with both the Father and the Holy Spirit.
Essentially the word one is describing the being of God while we have other statements that describe the persons of God (not human persons but distinct identities). There is not conflict unless someone disregards one or the other.
Jn.17:21 Jesus prays that they all may be one, as you Father are in me , and I in you , that they also may be one in us."
In the New Testament there is a Greek equivalent to the Hebrew word for one. In Mt.19:5 Jesus quotes Gen.2:24 about a husband and wife becoming one flesh; the word used is hen. Jesus prays that as believers we will be one even as ( Gr. kathos; according as, just as, even as) he and the Father are one. He did not mean our persons would be fused together, it means spiritually united. The God of the Old Testament is a united one. The God of the New Testament is a united one. This is what is meant by God being one.
Jn.10:30 "I and my Father are one," this is not numerical; Jesus is not saying he is the Father. They are not one person, but in nature they are unified. It actually reads "we are one" in Greek the first person plural esmen means‘ we are.’ Again this is a unity in nature not a numerical statement
The word one in Greek is Hen and it is a neuter nominative so it refers to one in essence and nature, and kind. That he is deity just as the Father is. He went on to explain he is the Son of God and the Pharisees understood his claim of making himself out to be equal with the Father.
Eph. 2:18 " Through Christ we both have access to the Father, by one Spirit."
Here we have three distinct persons involved in our relationship to God. Christ the person (God/man) has made it possible, the Spirit who is the means of access and the Father who is the object. The scripture uses "we" both in relation to the Jews and gentiles, two people groups. These same words are used also of the Son and the Father showing they are two different persons.
2 Cor. 13:14 "May the grace of the Lord Jesus Christ, and the love of God, and the fellowship of the Holy Spirit be with you all". Here again are all three mentioned why make distinctions if they are all the same person.
There are numerous illustrations in the O.T. of the three being one. For example there is a tradition even today as the Jew’s say the S’hma Deut.6:4 it is broken up into three segments each repeated three times while the last word one is said only once, indicating unity. Isaiah when he saw the Lord in his temple Isa.6 said, "holy, holy, holy,". Also in Rev. 4:8 it describes the angels saying it thrice day and night, showing it is a set pattern in heaven where God dwells. Yet more times than not God is represented as the Holy one of Israel. In Numbers 6:24 we find a thrice fold blessing with the title Lord. Num 6:24-27 "The LORD bless you and keep you; the LORD make His face shine upon you, and be gracious to you; the LORD lift up His countenance upon you, and give you peace." "So they shall put My name on the children of Israel, and I will bless them." In like manner 2 Cor.13:14 states" The grace of the Lord Jesus, and the love of God and the communion of the Holy Spirit be with you all." Here we see all three mentioned as a unit. While this cannot emphatically prove tri-unity it does show there was this concept that is not foreign to the scriptures.
baptism dont save you friend, and if you follow gino youre following oneness/modalism, a cult condemned heretical by the early church.
@@robrobert3438 WAIT! WAIT! WAIT! Out of all the articles, scriptures, and your opinion. How did u come up with CULT? I’m confused! Explain?
Thank God for Pastor Jennings! I had been waiting a while for the chance to get baptized. Finally got baptized yesterday in Montgomery, Alabama. Hallelujah 🎉
Amen.
Amen
Amen
❤🙏 TOG
Thank you pastor Gino Jennings for always bringing the undiluted word of God am forever grateful🙌🏽👏🏽🙏✝️🔥
Isaiah 8:20
baptism dont save you friend, and if you follow gino youre following oneness/modalism, a cult condemned heretical by the early church.
hes a liar and deceiver.
Yes indeed, Always and forever
1. Where in the Scripture does it say that God is unitarian? (or that God exist as one Person?)
If God is unitarian, how do you explain passages such as Genesis 19:24 where Yahweh (“LORD”), rained brimstone and fire from the Yahweh out of heaven?
If God is unitarian, why are there so many plural descriptions in the OT (viz. plural nouns, adjectives, and verbs) to describe God?
If God is unitarian, why is it that there are so many places in the Bible where the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are clearly distinguished from each other in the same verse?
If Jesus is the Father, why is it that Jesus is explicitly referred to as “the Son” over two hundred times in the New Testament, and never once is he called “Father?
If the “Son” has not eternally existed with (personally distinct from) the Father why then is the Son presented as the Agent of creation, that is, the Creator? (for in Oneness theology only Jesus as the “Father” mode existed prior to Bethlehem).
If the Son did not eternally exist with the Father as a distinct Person why is it that the “Son” can say, “Now, Father, glorify Me together with Yourself, with the glory which I had [eichon, or “shared”] with You before the world was” (emphasis added)?
Thus, how did the Son have (literally, actively “possessed”) glory with (para) the Father before time if the Son did not exist before Bethlehem?
If the Son did not eternally exist with the Father as a distinct Person why is it that the “Son” is said to be “sent” from the Father “out of heaven”?
If Oneness doctrine is biblically true, why then do the biblical authors use grammatical features that personally distinguish between the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit?
If Oneness doctrine (or Modalism) is the so-called doctrine of the apostles, then, why was it universally condemned as *heretical* by the early church Fathers (some of who were disciples of the original apostles) and condemned by all the important church councils and creeds?
Truth of God Church is here to correct what has been deviated in false churches. What a precious gift from God.
heretical as stated by the early church- gino is a false preacher.
Another powerful message for the salvation of our souls!
Greetings from the UK yet another excellent sermon all Glory to Jehovah God Almighty hallelujah amen.
I am now Tarrying for the Holy Ghost it's tough but I'm selfish for my Lord and I want him for myself so I stand longer shout louder and more over more and more each day I keep going back everyday until he moves on me, he quicken my spirit and changed it for that time but I haven't received it yet so please pray that I recieve the Holy Ghost. And I will pray for you bretheren that it falls upon you as you pray and tarry for it
Oh yes?
Keep tarrying when your feeling the quickening that's Good! Keep seeking him hallelujah!
I come into agreement with you. For the vision is yet for an appointed time, but at the end it shall speak, and not lie: though it tarry, wait for it; because it will surely come, it will not tarry. Habakkuk 2:3.
God is not a man to lie, and His word does not return vioded. Be kind, loving, obedient and patient as you wait. Do not allow yourself to grow weary while awaiting your blessing.
May this season be one you gain more insight and knowledge of love your heavenly Father has for you.
In Jesus Christ name I ask and pray, Amen
Please keep praying and fasting, God will fill you up in due season if he see an obedient heart.
baptism dont save you friend, and if you follow gino youre following oneness/modalism, a cult condemned heretical by the early church. pm me- you recieve the HG when you accept Jesus' Blood sacrifice sister.
I truly like this Pastor and the teaching of scriptures there is a man of truthfulness as I see him only As a man of integrity continue this hard hitting journey.
Glory to the Father!
Wonderful message as always!
Love and greetings from New Zealand pastor Jennings and all brethrens of the TOG all over the world ❤🙏
Fight on my soul fight on🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻
THANK YOU FATHER FOR PASTOR GINO 🙌🏾
Another Sunday and I am here by the Mercy of our Great God Jesus Christ!! Bless the Lord for Apostle Gino!!
Praise God for his Holy Word. God's Word is Truth. Amen.
Preach preacheeeer
I'm with you and your church ,asking God to protect you.
Get rid of the devil and all sin goes away.
The specific preaching style today answered a question I had been asking God lately. Thanks!
Bless The Lord Jesus
Food for the soul, we can only say thank you God.
Zambia is watching and have continued gathering since we received the baptism in the name of Jesus Christ last year August. We will hold fast to the truth of God, pray for our growth brothers and sisters.
Amen, keep holding on to Jesus Christ!
We give glory to God the almighty
Please continue to keep our leaders in Prayer and Fasting Daily Amen.
LOVING THE TRUTH OF GOD AND APOSTLE JENNINGS, HERE IN ANNAPOLIS MD!!!
I love this Holiness teaching God help us all to connect 🙏
Hello believers, and I'm finally ready to listen and learn what God has for us by his servant today......off from work!
Amen 🙏🏿🙏🏿🙏🏿
Greetings everyone, I don’t usually comment on videos but I truly thank God for showing me the Truth and what God has done and continue to do in my life! I’ve been following the Truth of God for 10 months now. I remember when I was struggling with smoking weed but one day I started rolling up my weed to smoke and as I started smoking while listening to Pastor Jennings and I felt very convicted that day and started crying midway through my smoke session and threw away the weed and never touched it again. I got baptized 07/01/22 and my life has completely changed ever since I’ve been being obedient to the Word of God. Please keep me in pray as I do for y’all!!
I Will keep you in Prayer 🙏. Peace Be.
Thanks be to God for shining His light on us through the way you break down scripture, every time I listen to any of your teaching I just marvel, I have never seen or heard this before and I thank God for this revelation, may the Lord help me to obey Him
TONGUES AND BAPTISM FOR SALVATION
If we are saved before baptism by faith then baptism cannot convey to us the Spirit no matter what name is said over a person. If you are saved by baptism, (by calling on Jesus name) then it was not faith that saved but an ordinance you had faith in. If it was at your baptism you had called on him for the first time to save you this would not make sense, since it is our response to the gospel message by faith that saves.
Oneness Pentecostals (a separate group of Pentecostals) teach that "speaking in tongues" must accompany the conversion of all Christians to prove they have the Spirit. The process to salvation is repentance, faith, baptism in Jesus name, then comes the waiting for the Acts 2 experience. Either before or after is obedience to commands and works. The Oneness Pentecostals make tongues as the proof that one possesses salvation. Many wait for this evidence to occur and when it does not they look desperately to find whatever flaw or sin is holding back His Spirit from coming. I can’t think of something more disheartening than to think your not saved because you haven’t had this experience of tongues.
John the Baptist never spoke another tongue yet he was filled with the spirit from his mothers womb. The book of Acts gives us the normal pattern for receiving the Holy Spirit. One thing becomes clear as the texts are looked at carefully, there is no consistent pattern of reception. In order for something to be normative it needs to be consistent and a common thing to all, clearly it is not as proposed by the Oneness view.
If we look carefully through the book of Acts There are only three references to believers speaking in tongues when salvation was given. Acts 2 those in the upper room who did not know what they were waiting for, Acts 10 the spirit falls on them while the message is given and they speak to give evidence to Peter that the gentiles are allowed to enter the Church. And Acts 19
The order for the Jews in Acts 2 was vs.38 repent,vs.41 they gladly received the word then they were baptized publicly in a Christian baptism and received the spirit of promise. Which was the same promise given to the apostles by Jesus in Acts 1:5. The unbelieving Jews were witnesses to God beginning a new entity the Church.
Acts 8 for the Samaritans the order was they believed and were baptized vs.12-17 then they had the apostles lay hands on them and received the Holy Spirit
Acts 10 the gentiles order was as he was speaking the Holy Spirit was given because of their faith that God saw in their hearts vs.44-48 then they were baptized. so we can see each time a different way in which the spirit was given.
Acts 10 opposes the view of having to be baptized first to receive the Spirit as Oneness claims. Are we to believe God poured out his Spirit in the same way as Pentecost on people whose sins were not yet forgiven? Clearly the Spirit is given by grace.
However we find their was a common denominator, they were all saved the same way. By faith
Lets take a journey through the book of Acts and see what transpired in each instance of salvation. Did all speak in tongues were all baptized (in Jesus name) to receive the spirit. What we find will be very productive in understanding the truth.
Acts 2 Death and resurrection are proclaimed 3,000 are saved. as Jews they publicly declare their allegiance to Christ by being baptized and receive the spirit. No tongues for the 3,000.This is important in that so many make tongues the required manifestation to show they were saved. Nowhere does anyone refer to Acts 2 as the model for each time a group or people were saved. Only in Acts 11 does Peter recall what happened to them in the upper room.
Acts 3:18-19 Christ’s death and repentance is the focus for the forgiveness of their sins. In Acts 4:2-4 Jesus & the resurrection is preached, not baptism & again they believed the word & 5,000 were saved. There was no tongues , and no baptism mentioned.
Acts 4:31 tells us they spoke the word boldly when they were filled with the spirit. no tongues, and no baptism mentioned
Acts 8:17 Peter and John come to the Samaritans who had already received the word of God & were baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus and still did not have the spirit. ( Peter needed to be there, he was present for all three groups : Jews, Samaritans and Gentiles) there were no tongues.
Acts 8:37-38 After hearing Isa.53 which is about the death of Jesus he asks to be baptized, Philip reply’s if you believe with all your heart. He confesses Jesus is the son of God. no tongues (maybe he did maybe he didn't.)
Acts 9:17-18 when Paul received salvation he did not speak in tongues until later, yet no one would contest he was saved. When he gives his testimony he refers back to the Damascus road encounter as the time of his Spiritual birth. In vs. 17 it tells us when Ananias laid hands on him he was filled with the Spirit then he was baptized.
(1Cor.15:18, Gal.1:12) He later does speak in tongues as probably all the apostles did.
Acts 10:43 Peter says "To him give all the prophets witness, that through his name whosoever believeth in him shall receive remission of sins.
We have the exact reversal of Acts 2 ,they then received the Spirit from hearing the word & believing, before any baptism. The gentiles speak in tongues as proof of their salvation to some of the unbelieving Jews present who refused to believe they could be partakers of salvation. If no Jews were there would not have been necessary for this sign gift to be manifested. vs.48 they were commanded to be baptized in the name of the Lord.
Acts 11:16-18 Peter recounts the Lord saying about the difference between water baptism and spirit baptism. Vs 17" if therefore God gave them the same gift as he did unto us, when we believed on the Lord Jesus Christ;"
Acts 15 the Jerusalem council was called because some men said that certain parts of the law needed to be obeyed. Vs 8 Peter recounts how the gentiles heard the word of the gospel and believed, God seeing their hearts acknowledged them by giving them the H. Spirit just as he did us. And making no distinction between us & them, purifying their hearts by faith vs.11" We believe that through the grace of the Lord Jesus we shall be saved in the same manner". Notice that Peter makes it clear its by grace and that the gentiles were actually saved being baptized in the Spirit before any confession or baptism. (1 Cor.12:13) Everyone enters into Christ the same way then and today.Eph.1:13 tells us when they believed in the gospel (1 Cor.15:1-4) they were sealed by the Holy Spirit.
Acts 16:31 the Philipian jailer asks what must I do to be saved ? answer believe on the Lord Jesus Christ and you will be saved, you & your household. then they spoke the word of the Lord to both him & his household. No tongues, no baptism until later
What we find in the book of Acts is no set formulae for the giving of the Spirit. What was required in all the accounts was faith. Tongues were not present except in a few instances.
Acts 19 vs.5 they were baptized in the name of the Lord. Jews who only received Johns baptism had not heard of Christ’s death and resurrection nor Pentecost. It is Paul who initiates the conversation on the Holy Spirit. He finds that they are not disciples of Christ but of John, years after they had not heard that the one John was pointing to had already come. After receiving the Gospel they are baptized Paul lays hands on them the Holy Spirit comes upon them and they speak in tongues and prophecy. They did not seek after the Spirit as the Oneness Pentecostals are told, it was a natural occurrence. Not one instance do we see anyone laboring for the Spirit. Why was the Spirit given after Paul laid hands on them. It was to illustrate that they were no longer to follow John the Baptizer but the apostles who now had the leadership role for Israel. The Church with the apostles as their leaders replaced the Sanhedrin and Pharisees and even John.
In each case when tongues are manifested there are Jews present (sometimes in unbelief). The conclusion can only be that that tongues were given primarily as a sign to unbelieving Jews or to those new people groups entering the body. As with Acts 10 they were in unbelief that the gentiles could be saved and so God gave them the Holy Spirit and as proof gave them languages unlearned for evidence to those present. Their conclusion was that they received what they had at Pentecost. In Acts 19 The unbelieving Jews that were only water baptized spoke in tongues was proof to them that Jesus died and resurrected and the Holy Spirit had come.
Tongues is neither the initial evidence of their salvation anymore than prophecy would be. If we take the Oneness Pentecostal attitude to its conclusion …then one must have hands laid on them to receive the spirit and that they must be in groups of twelve to thousands like the other occurrences with tongues instead of single persons. One might even add that fire should appear over their heads as it did at Pentecost. People try to insert other incidents but they are all arguments from silence and are not Scripturally consistent or verifiable .
Acts 26:18 "that they may receive forgiveness of sins, and inheritance among them which are sanctified by faith that is in me. that is in Jesus Christ. The majority of teaching of how to be spiritually born is by faith. The order today is faith, the receiving of the Holy Spirit and our response in baptism. So with a handful of scripture on baptism with over 240 on faith and believe, not including those about Christ’s death we can see how important it is to rightly divide the word.
Is tongues necessary for salvation? No! otherwise we will have to eliminate most of the salvation’s in the book of Acts. It is an evidence but not THE evidence for all.
TRUTH TRUTH 💯 For the lasts day
Amen
The man that 🗣SHOUTS out encouraging words as you preach is very uplifting and encouraging!!😊
That’s Logan… god bless..
Great Word‼️
They can't fight and win so all they have to do is just agree. 654 SOULS in 3 weeks what a blessing. 🙏🙏
AMEN!
THE WORD ONE
Both Trinitarians and Oneness believe there is one God. But it is how we define it that makes the difference.
The Oneness teaching takes all the Scriptures that say God is one and purposely ignore the statements of Jesus and the gospel writers that speak of two or three persons of the Godhead. In the Old Testament teachings were focused on God being one in contrast to the polytheism of the nations that surrounded Israel. There are statements that speak of the plurality of this ONE God in the Old Testament record. However, it is only when we come to the New Testament that this one in unity is explained.
Bernard writes that the word apparently can mean both one in unity and one numerically for Strong's defines it as "united, one, first." He then gives just a few examples to prove that we should choose its meaning to be an absolute one.(Oneness of God, pp.152-153) Bernard finds a few examples contrary to the plural meaning which in no way is exhaustive. However the context determines the meaning.
In the Old Testament God is described as one. Duet.6:4 says, "Hear, O Israel: LORD our God is one: what Oneness does is camp on this passage, milking it till the cows come home. The phrase "one Lord" is preceded in the Hebrew by elohenu; it is our God is one. The word for one is not a numerical one but is actually a united one. The Hebrew word for one is echad, which comes from the root word achad, which means to unify or collect together (the intensive reflexive form signifying to unite). If this was meant to be a strict numerical statement the Holy Spirit would have had Moses use the word yachid, which means a absolute one, single, only one. Yachid is used twelve times in the Scriptures NOT ONCE is it used for Jehovah God. Despite all the explanations we can see they fail in light of the consistent usage of the word one throughout.
The Bible defines how the word one is used.
Gen.1:5 evening and morning are called one day ( a combination of two parts to make one) they are both considered a day yet we can distinguish them as different phases.
Gen. 2:24 Adam and Eve become one flesh (Here two personalities who come together in marriage and are one, not one person but in unity. God sees them as one even though they are not physically fused together like Siamese twins. If we take the Oneness view this would be the only consideration for our understanding.
Gen.11:6 the people are one Ezra 2:64 the whole assembly of Israel is like one.
Num. 13:23 according to their view When the spies went over into the land of Canaan they brought back one grape (Heb. eschal echad.) Thats one big grap ! Can anyone actually think it was a numerical statement. It means a cluster of grapes.
Ps.133:1 the brethren is to dwell as one ( in unity) 1 Sam.3:17 they are called one company 2 Sam. 2:25 one troop 1 kings 7:42 one tribe 1 Kings 11:13 Israel is called one nation.
Ez. 37:17 Ezekial is told to put two sticks together and combined they become one stick. Showing the nation would be unified. In all these examples can anyone find them to be a strict singular meaning ? This same word is applied to the one God and is clearly used as a compound unity. You can twist and turn at the truth of the matter , you can be uncomfortable in its teaching but you can’t remove its consistent usage in the scripture.
The word for a strict single is yachid it is used in Gen.22:2 "Take thy one and only son." This can also be used for Gods only son being unique and one of a kind.
PLURAL STATEMENTS OF GOD IN THE N.T
Vs.20 "I am in my Father and you are in me and I in you in vs.23 he speaks in a plural ... and we will come to him and make our home with him. Is the humanity of Christ going to make its home in us! This is one of the few times Jesus speaks in a plural context to explain his unity with both the Father and the Holy Spirit.
Essentially the word one is describing the being of God while we have other statements that describe the persons of God (not human persons but distinct identities). There is not conflict unless someone disregards one or the other.
Jn.17:21 Jesus prays that they all may be one, as you Father are in me , and I in you , that they also may be one in us."
In the New Testament there is a Greek equivalent to the Hebrew word for one. In Mt.19:5 Jesus quotes Gen.2:24 about a husband and wife becoming one flesh; the word used is hen. Jesus prays that as believers we will be one even as ( Gr. kathos; according as, just as, even as) he and the Father are one. He did not mean our persons would be fused together, it means spiritually united. The God of the Old Testament is a united one. The God of the New Testament is a united one. This is what is meant by God being one.
Jn.10:30 "I and my Father are one," this is not numerical; Jesus is not saying he is the Father. They are not one person, but in nature they are unified. It actually reads "we are one" in Greek the first person plural esmen means‘ we are.’ Again this is a unity in nature not a numerical statement
The word one in Greek is Hen and it is a neuter nominative so it refers to one in essence and nature, and kind. That he is deity just as the Father is. He went on to explain he is the Son of God and the Pharisees understood his claim of making himself out to be equal with the Father.
Eph. 2:18 " Through Christ we both have access to the Father, by one Spirit."
Here we have three distinct persons involved in our relationship to God. Christ the person (God/man) has made it possible, the Spirit who is the means of access and the Father who is the object. The scripture uses "we" both in relation to the Jews and gentiles, two people groups. These same words are used also of the Son and the Father showing they are two different persons.
2 Cor. 13:14 "May the grace of the Lord Jesus Christ, and the love of God, and the fellowship of the Holy Spirit be with you all". Here again are all three mentioned why make distinctions if they are all the same person.
There are numerous illustrations in the O.T. of the three being one. For example there is a tradition even today as the Jew’s say the S’hma Deut.6:4 it is broken up into three segments each repeated three times while the last word one is said only once, indicating unity. Isaiah when he saw the Lord in his temple Isa.6 said, "holy, holy, holy,". Also in Rev. 4:8 it describes the angels saying it thrice day and night, showing it is a set pattern in heaven where God dwells. Yet more times than not God is represented as the Holy one of Israel. In Numbers 6:24 we find a thrice fold blessing with the title Lord. Num 6:24-27 "The LORD bless you and keep you; the LORD make His face shine upon you, and be gracious to you; the LORD lift up His countenance upon you, and give you peace." "So they shall put My name on the children of Israel, and I will bless them." In like manner 2 Cor.13:14 states" The grace of the Lord Jesus, and the love of God and the communion of the Holy Spirit be with you all." Here we see all three mentioned as a unit. While this cannot emphatically prove tri-unity it does show there was this concept that is not foreign to the scriptures.
Wonderful service as always♥️🙏🏽
I love you off Pastor Jennings, the Lord God bless your going out & your coming in & from this day forth...❤
Yes, no religion is spared by the 🌈 community & the devil is behind it all! All praises to the almighty GOD who is able! Thank you LORZ for everything 🥺 😌🙏🏽
Great message! So good to see a pastor not afraid to speak the truth. Great sermon Pastor Jennings.
Greetings everyone. Strive to enter in at the straight gate. Peace be.
I just love listening to the Apostle Jennings .I stumbled across this channel in 2020 during the covid lockdown and don't want to miss any of his preaching which is the truth and just plain so everyone can get the message.May God Almighty bless his labour and sacrifices.
Im from CapeTown South Africa
God bless you all
Preach pastor. Preach. God is with you.! It can't get no more raw than this. A true prophet indeed. I think God for you.
He’s an apostle not a prophet those are 2 different offices. Ephesians 4:11 read it and God set some in the body , He gave Apostles, prophets, Evangelist, pastors and teachers all different offices Apostles and prophets must work hand and hand because the church was built upon the apostles and prophets through Jesus Christ
Amen 🙏❤😊 Wonderful teaching 👏👏👏
What a wonderful and powerful holy message that the holy spirit manifested thur the Apostle Gino Jennings may the Lord keep blessing the TOG congregation and all who believe in the living word of GOD 🙏🙏 please come to Denver Colorado
"God is bigger than all the revelation he ever gave to men". 😮
What a great teaching this Sunday,as always glory to God
Thank you Lord Jesus for your faithful servant pastor Jennings who brings us the True Word,YOU AMEN 🙏🏼
Glorious Sermon!!
This man is really getting his messages from the third heavens with my God what a message? he that has an ear to hear let him hear, God's riches blessings upon you and your family Apostle Jennings.🇯🇲🇯🇲🇯🇲👋
You mean he’s getting his message from Jesus Christ himself, through the WORD. I wasn’t aware that the third heaven gives out message. If you can send a scripture, then I’d be happy to gladly read it to be edified.
So so true what PJ is preaching and the haters continue to discredit. But this is God’s doing. 🙏🏾
TONGUES AND BAPTISM FOR SALVATION
If we are saved before baptism by faith then baptism cannot convey to us the Spirit no matter what name is said over a person. If you are saved by baptism, (by calling on Jesus name) then it was not faith that saved but an ordinance you had faith in. If it was at your baptism you had called on him for the first time to save you this would not make sense, since it is our response to the gospel message by faith that saves.
Oneness Pentecostals (a separate group of Pentecostals) teach that "speaking in tongues" must accompany the conversion of all Christians to prove they have the Spirit. The process to salvation is repentance, faith, baptism in Jesus name, then comes the waiting for the Acts 2 experience. Either before or after is obedience to commands and works. The Oneness Pentecostals make tongues as the proof that one possesses salvation. Many wait for this evidence to occur and when it does not they look desperately to find whatever flaw or sin is holding back His Spirit from coming. I can’t think of something more disheartening than to think your not saved because you haven’t had this experience of tongues.
John the Baptist never spoke another tongue yet he was filled with the spirit from his mothers womb. The book of Acts gives us the normal pattern for receiving the Holy Spirit. One thing becomes clear as the texts are looked at carefully, there is no consistent pattern of reception. In order for something to be normative it needs to be consistent and a common thing to all, clearly it is not as proposed by the Oneness view.
If we look carefully through the book of Acts There are only three references to believers speaking in tongues when salvation was given. Acts 2 those in the upper room who did not know what they were waiting for, Acts 10 the spirit falls on them while the message is given and they speak to give evidence to Peter that the gentiles are allowed to enter the Church. And Acts 19
The order for the Jews in Acts 2 was vs.38 repent,vs.41 they gladly received the word then they were baptized publicly in a Christian baptism and received the spirit of promise. Which was the same promise given to the apostles by Jesus in Acts 1:5. The unbelieving Jews were witnesses to God beginning a new entity the Church.
Acts 8 for the Samaritans the order was they believed and were baptized vs.12-17 then they had the apostles lay hands on them and received the Holy Spirit
Acts 10 the gentiles order was as he was speaking the Holy Spirit was given because of their faith that God saw in their hearts vs.44-48 then they were baptized. so we can see each time a different way in which the spirit was given.
Acts 10 opposes the view of having to be baptized first to receive the Spirit as Oneness claims. Are we to believe God poured out his Spirit in the same way as Pentecost on people whose sins were not yet forgiven? Clearly the Spirit is given by grace.
However we find their was a common denominator, they were all saved the same way. By faith
Lets take a journey through the book of Acts and see what transpired in each instance of salvation. Did all speak in tongues were all baptized (in Jesus name) to receive the spirit. What we find will be very productive in understanding the truth.
Acts 2 Death and resurrection are proclaimed 3,000 are saved. as Jews they publicly declare their allegiance to Christ by being baptized and receive the spirit. No tongues for the 3,000.This is important in that so many make tongues the required manifestation to show they were saved. Nowhere does anyone refer to Acts 2 as the model for each time a group or people were saved. Only in Acts 11 does Peter recall what happened to them in the upper room.
Acts 3:18-19 Christ’s death and repentance is the focus for the forgiveness of their sins. In Acts 4:2-4 Jesus & the resurrection is preached, not baptism & again they believed the word & 5,000 were saved. There was no tongues , and no baptism mentioned.
Acts 4:31 tells us they spoke the word boldly when they were filled with the spirit. no tongues, and no baptism mentioned
Acts 8:17 Peter and John come to the Samaritans who had already received the word of God & were baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus and still did not have the spirit. ( Peter needed to be there, he was present for all three groups : Jews, Samaritans and Gentiles) there were no tongues.
Acts 8:37-38 After hearing Isa.53 which is about the death of Jesus he asks to be baptized, Philip reply’s if you believe with all your heart. He confesses Jesus is the son of God. no tongues (maybe he did maybe he didn't.)
Acts 9:17-18 when Paul received salvation he did not speak in tongues until later, yet no one would contest he was saved. When he gives his testimony he refers back to the Damascus road encounter as the time of his Spiritual birth. In vs. 17 it tells us when Ananias laid hands on him he was filled with the Spirit then he was baptized.
(1Cor.15:18, Gal.1:12) He later does speak in tongues as probably all the apostles did.
Acts 10:43 Peter says "To him give all the prophets witness, that through his name whosoever believeth in him shall receive remission of sins.
We have the exact reversal of Acts 2 ,they then received the Spirit from hearing the word & believing, before any baptism. The gentiles speak in tongues as proof of their salvation to some of the unbelieving Jews present who refused to believe they could be partakers of salvation. If no Jews were there would not have been necessary for this sign gift to be manifested. vs.48 they were commanded to be baptized in the name of the Lord.
Acts 11:16-18 Peter recounts the Lord saying about the difference between water baptism and spirit baptism. Vs 17" if therefore God gave them the same gift as he did unto us, when we believed on the Lord Jesus Christ;"
Acts 15 the Jerusalem council was called because some men said that certain parts of the law needed to be obeyed. Vs 8 Peter recounts how the gentiles heard the word of the gospel and believed, God seeing their hearts acknowledged them by giving them the H. Spirit just as he did us. And making no distinction between us & them, purifying their hearts by faith vs.11" We believe that through the grace of the Lord Jesus we shall be saved in the same manner". Notice that Peter makes it clear its by grace and that the gentiles were actually saved being baptized in the Spirit before any confession or baptism. (1 Cor.12:13) Everyone enters into Christ the same way then and today.Eph.1:13 tells us when they believed in the gospel (1 Cor.15:1-4) they were sealed by the Holy Spirit.
Acts 16:31 the Philipian jailer asks what must I do to be saved ? answer believe on the Lord Jesus Christ and you will be saved, you & your household. then they spoke the word of the Lord to both him & his household. No tongues, no baptism until later
What we find in the book of Acts is no set formulae for the giving of the Spirit. What was required in all the accounts was faith. Tongues were not present except in a few instances.
Acts 19 vs.5 they were baptized in the name of the Lord. Jews who only received Johns baptism had not heard of Christ’s death and resurrection nor Pentecost. It is Paul who initiates the conversation on the Holy Spirit. He finds that they are not disciples of Christ but of John, years after they had not heard that the one John was pointing to had already come. After receiving the Gospel they are baptized Paul lays hands on them the Holy Spirit comes upon them and they speak in tongues and prophecy. They did not seek after the Spirit as the Oneness Pentecostals are told, it was a natural occurrence. Not one instance do we see anyone laboring for the Spirit. Why was the Spirit given after Paul laid hands on them. It was to illustrate that they were no longer to follow John the Baptizer but the apostles who now had the leadership role for Israel. The Church with the apostles as their leaders replaced the Sanhedrin and Pharisees and even John.
In each case when tongues are manifested there are Jews present (sometimes in unbelief). The conclusion can only be that that tongues were given primarily as a sign to unbelieving Jews or to those new people groups entering the body. As with Acts 10 they were in unbelief that the gentiles could be saved and so God gave them the Holy Spirit and as proof gave them languages unlearned for evidence to those present. Their conclusion was that they received what they had at Pentecost. In Acts 19 The unbelieving Jews that were only water baptized spoke in tongues was proof to them that Jesus died and resurrected and the Holy Spirit had come.
Tongues is neither the initial evidence of their salvation anymore than prophecy would be. If we take the Oneness Pentecostal attitude to its conclusion …then one must have hands laid on them to receive the spirit and that they must be in groups of twelve to thousands like the other occurrences with tongues instead of single persons. One might even add that fire should appear over their heads as it did at Pentecost. People try to insert other incidents but they are all arguments from silence and are not Scripturally consistent or verifiable .
Acts 26:18 "that they may receive forgiveness of sins, and inheritance among them which are sanctified by faith that is in me. that is in Jesus Christ. The majority of teaching of how to be spiritually born is by faith. The order today is faith, the receiving of the Holy Spirit and our response in baptism. So with a handful of scripture on baptism with over 240 on faith and believe, not including those about Christ’s death we can see how important it is to rightly divide the word.
Is tongues necessary for salvation? No! otherwise we will have to eliminate most of the salvation’s in the book of Acts. It is an evidence but not THE evidence for all.
Greetings from from Antigua
Pastor looks well rested and healthy❗️May GOD continue to keep him through his travels❗️♥️🙏🏾♥️
Gino i am well beresed on the word
The Truth.
My fellow Aussies are gonna love you Hoss. God bless you, Preacher
We get Growth, Sound Doctrine Amen.We highly recommend this real teaching and preaching Amen ! Truth Amen.
Uncle Samael and Aunty Lilith
Praise God for this message 😊
Glory to god. I thank god for you pastor Jennings
capital G for God
Thank God.
God is Holy.
The Truth of God is unstoppable, God bless you always pastor Jennings 🙏
AMEN AMEN AMEN PASTOR!!! GLORY TO THE ALMIGHTY!!!!
Amen.
I never heard it like this and I calling on you pastor to put one in Birmingham Alabama please
Appreciative for one more day of hearing the Lord’s Word. Saints, please keep Apostle Pastor Jennings, Minister Williams and all of the TOG Ministry in your prayers. May the Lord bless and keep all who have died in this life for the Lord. Peace unto all.
false preacher, false gospel friend.
LET THE TRUTH OF GOD BE TOLD...AMEN!
Glory be to the one true God of alllllllll creation. I thank God Almighty for this truth teachings.
I love seeing all the Men and boys attending learning how to really Act like A Man especially in knowing how to treat his wife and That's with Love and Affection.
TONGUES AND BAPTISM FOR SALVATION
If we are saved before baptism by faith then baptism cannot convey to us the Spirit no matter what name is said over a person. If you are saved by baptism, (by calling on Jesus name) then it was not faith that saved but an ordinance you had faith in. If it was at your baptism you had called on him for the first time to save you this would not make sense, since it is our response to the gospel message by faith that saves.
Oneness Pentecostals (a separate group of Pentecostals) teach that "speaking in tongues" must accompany the conversion of all Christians to prove they have the Spirit. The process to salvation is repentance, faith, baptism in Jesus name, then comes the waiting for the Acts 2 experience. Either before or after is obedience to commands and works. The Oneness Pentecostals make tongues as the proof that one possesses salvation. Many wait for this evidence to occur and when it does not they look desperately to find whatever flaw or sin is holding back His Spirit from coming. I can’t think of something more disheartening than to think your not saved because you haven’t had this experience of tongues.
John the Baptist never spoke another tongue yet he was filled with the spirit from his mothers womb. The book of Acts gives us the normal pattern for receiving the Holy Spirit. One thing becomes clear as the texts are looked at carefully, there is no consistent pattern of reception. In order for something to be normative it needs to be consistent and a common thing to all, clearly it is not as proposed by the Oneness view.
If we look carefully through the book of Acts There are only three references to believers speaking in tongues when salvation was given. Acts 2 those in the upper room who did not know what they were waiting for, Acts 10 the spirit falls on them while the message is given and they speak to give evidence to Peter that the gentiles are allowed to enter the Church. And Acts 19
The order for the Jews in Acts 2 was vs.38 repent,vs.41 they gladly received the word then they were baptized publicly in a Christian baptism and received the spirit of promise. Which was the same promise given to the apostles by Jesus in Acts 1:5. The unbelieving Jews were witnesses to God beginning a new entity the Church.
Acts 8 for the Samaritans the order was they believed and were baptized vs.12-17 then they had the apostles lay hands on them and received the Holy Spirit
Acts 10 the gentiles order was as he was speaking the Holy Spirit was given because of their faith that God saw in their hearts vs.44-48 then they were baptized. so we can see each time a different way in which the spirit was given.
Acts 10 opposes the view of having to be baptized first to receive the Spirit as Oneness claims. Are we to believe God poured out his Spirit in the same way as Pentecost on people whose sins were not yet forgiven? Clearly the Spirit is given by grace.
However we find their was a common denominator, they were all saved the same way. By faith
Lets take a journey through the book of Acts and see what transpired in each instance of salvation. Did all speak in tongues were all baptized (in Jesus name) to receive the spirit. What we find will be very productive in understanding the truth.
Acts 2 Death and resurrection are proclaimed 3,000 are saved. as Jews they publicly declare their allegiance to Christ by being baptized and receive the spirit. No tongues for the 3,000.This is important in that so many make tongues the required manifestation to show they were saved. Nowhere does anyone refer to Acts 2 as the model for each time a group or people were saved. Only in Acts 11 does Peter recall what happened to them in the upper room.
Acts 3:18-19 Christ’s death and repentance is the focus for the forgiveness of their sins. In Acts 4:2-4 Jesus & the resurrection is preached, not baptism & again they believed the word & 5,000 were saved. There was no tongues , and no baptism mentioned.
Acts 4:31 tells us they spoke the word boldly when they were filled with the spirit. no tongues, and no baptism mentioned
Acts 8:17 Peter and John come to the Samaritans who had already received the word of God & were baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus and still did not have the spirit. ( Peter needed to be there, he was present for all three groups : Jews, Samaritans and Gentiles) there were no tongues.
Acts 8:37-38 After hearing Isa.53 which is about the death of Jesus he asks to be baptized, Philip reply’s if you believe with all your heart. He confesses Jesus is the son of God. no tongues (maybe he did maybe he didn't.)
Acts 9:17-18 when Paul received salvation he did not speak in tongues until later, yet no one would contest he was saved. When he gives his testimony he refers back to the Damascus road encounter as the time of his Spiritual birth. In vs. 17 it tells us when Ananias laid hands on him he was filled with the Spirit then he was baptized.
(1Cor.15:18, Gal.1:12) He later does speak in tongues as probably all the apostles did.
Acts 10:43 Peter says "To him give all the prophets witness, that through his name whosoever believeth in him shall receive remission of sins.
We have the exact reversal of Acts 2 ,they then received the Spirit from hearing the word & believing, before any baptism. The gentiles speak in tongues as proof of their salvation to some of the unbelieving Jews present who refused to believe they could be partakers of salvation. If no Jews were there would not have been necessary for this sign gift to be manifested. vs.48 they were commanded to be baptized in the name of the Lord.
Acts 11:16-18 Peter recounts the Lord saying about the difference between water baptism and spirit baptism. Vs 17" if therefore God gave them the same gift as he did unto us, when we believed on the Lord Jesus Christ;"
Acts 15 the Jerusalem council was called because some men said that certain parts of the law needed to be obeyed. Vs 8 Peter recounts how the gentiles heard the word of the gospel and believed, God seeing their hearts acknowledged them by giving them the H. Spirit just as he did us. And making no distinction between us & them, purifying their hearts by faith vs.11" We believe that through the grace of the Lord Jesus we shall be saved in the same manner". Notice that Peter makes it clear its by grace and that the gentiles were actually saved being baptized in the Spirit before any confession or baptism. (1 Cor.12:13) Everyone enters into Christ the same way then and today.Eph.1:13 tells us when they believed in the gospel (1 Cor.15:1-4) they were sealed by the Holy Spirit.
Acts 16:31 the Philipian jailer asks what must I do to be saved ? answer believe on the Lord Jesus Christ and you will be saved, you & your household. then they spoke the word of the Lord to both him & his household. No tongues, no baptism until later
What we find in the book of Acts is no set formulae for the giving of the Spirit. What was required in all the accounts was faith. Tongues were not present except in a few instances.
Acts 19 vs.5 they were baptized in the name of the Lord. Jews who only received Johns baptism had not heard of Christ’s death and resurrection nor Pentecost. It is Paul who initiates the conversation on the Holy Spirit. He finds that they are not disciples of Christ but of John, years after they had not heard that the one John was pointing to had already come. After receiving the Gospel they are baptized Paul lays hands on them the Holy Spirit comes upon them and they speak in tongues and prophecy. They did not seek after the Spirit as the Oneness Pentecostals are told, it was a natural occurrence. Not one instance do we see anyone laboring for the Spirit. Why was the Spirit given after Paul laid hands on them. It was to illustrate that they were no longer to follow John the Baptizer but the apostles who now had the leadership role for Israel. The Church with the apostles as their leaders replaced the Sanhedrin and Pharisees and even John.
In each case when tongues are manifested there are Jews present (sometimes in unbelief). The conclusion can only be that that tongues were given primarily as a sign to unbelieving Jews or to those new people groups entering the body. As with Acts 10 they were in unbelief that the gentiles could be saved and so God gave them the Holy Spirit and as proof gave them languages unlearned for evidence to those present. Their conclusion was that they received what they had at Pentecost. In Acts 19 The unbelieving Jews that were only water baptized spoke in tongues was proof to them that Jesus died and resurrected and the Holy Spirit had come.
Tongues is neither the initial evidence of their salvation anymore than prophecy would be. If we take the Oneness Pentecostal attitude to its conclusion …then one must have hands laid on them to receive the spirit and that they must be in groups of twelve to thousands like the other occurrences with tongues instead of single persons. One might even add that fire should appear over their heads as it did at Pentecost. People try to insert other incidents but they are all arguments from silence and are not Scripturally consistent or verifiable .
Acts 26:18 "that they may receive forgiveness of sins, and inheritance among them which are sanctified by faith that is in me. that is in Jesus Christ. The majority of teaching of how to be spiritually born is by faith. The order today is faith, the receiving of the Holy Spirit and our response in baptism. So with a handful of scripture on baptism with over 240 on faith and believe, not including those about Christ’s death we can see how important it is to rightly divide the word.
Is tongues necessary for salvation? No! otherwise we will have to eliminate most of the salvation’s in the book of Acts. It is an evidence but not THE evidence for all.
Good Teachings.
I will only bow and worship God and that's fact Amen and Amen
I HEAR YA LOGAN....AGREE WITH TRUTH!
Thank you PastorJenni for the word of God.God bless you.
Thank God we still have men of old in this new Era of ungodlines
A powerful God creates a powerful man of God!
Amen
I was blessed so much by this message.
Thank God for you Pastor Gino 🙏 🙌 ❤ you're definitely sent fr Heaven 🙏
This man is much needed like the food we eat because he stay coming with that holy bread 🍞💯
This is truly the well of Grace
May God almighty continue to bless and protect pastor Jennings
He is a real man of God
Thank God for his mercy 🙏
Truly only with love for Our Lord Jesus Christ will a man preach the truth like this, I thank God for you Pastor Jennings(the light is on you).
Please support God's Doing Amen ! Good Ground to sow indeed.
🙏🏿We Are Blessed Yet Another Night,Day Week Month & Year!
Thank God for this message coming from the pastor, bring the true word of God!
Finally, I can stop searching for the truth. I thank God for sending this man of God who speaks the truth by God's permission! Amen.
This is a great message the congregation need to be all on their feet , what are they afraid of , when you know this message is true. That’s why the church is falling for everything. Don’t let fear grip you people
LEVITICUS CHAPTER 10 VERSE 10 (KJV) AMEN AMEN AMEN 🙏🙏♥️♥️💯💯
Shalom✌️and Agape 💕
Continue praying for church bldg in Baton Rouge, New Orleans, Lafayette La
There's a temple in Monroe and Lafayette
@@JustStrivingInHoliness 🙋 there, yes there is one in Lafayette, I was referring to one that's paid out, not lease/rent. Blessings!
@@juanitamczeal2809 🙏🏽🔥👍🏼👍🏼
@@JustStrivingInHoliness Thanks so much, keep praying please, the answer is in view!
Hi great program more people need to here this in US and in the world.
HALLELUJAH☝️AMEN
Pray for us in East Saint Louis to get a church home here we need it
Amen!!!🙏🏿🙏🏿🙏🏿🙏🏿
Thank Holy Ghost for you brother Gino, brother Williams, and all the ministers ordained by God!!! This channel has changed my life with God!!! All I can say is thank you Lord Jesus for your Existence!!!
Thank God for Souls.
I love the way GOD'S WORD causes that GOOD trouble.
Amen Apostle Jennings listen to the ol trouble maker. This message exposes that I'm a big fool acting out through my sick sinful emotions.
God is ONE amen 🙌
The truest mann of God I've ever listened to.
Praising God for his Word! Thank you FC🙏🏿✝️
Pastor has been send everywhere so we are still waiting on him to come to Greenville nc in Christ Jesus name. .
Amen he is needed here to preach the uncompromised gospel
THE TRUTH WILL SET YOU FREE AND WHO THE SON SETS FREE IS FREE INDEED....1,000]
AMEN,
TONGUES AND BAPTISM FOR SALVATION
If we are saved before baptism by faith then baptism cannot convey to us the Spirit no matter what name is said over a person. If you are saved by baptism, (by calling on Jesus name) then it was not faith that saved but an ordinance you had faith in. If it was at your baptism you had called on him for the first time to save you this would not make sense, since it is our response to the gospel message by faith that saves.
Oneness Pentecostals (a separate group of Pentecostals) teach that "speaking in tongues" must accompany the conversion of all Christians to prove they have the Spirit. The process to salvation is repentance, faith, baptism in Jesus name, then comes the waiting for the Acts 2 experience. Either before or after is obedience to commands and works. The Oneness Pentecostals make tongues as the proof that one possesses salvation. Many wait for this evidence to occur and when it does not they look desperately to find whatever flaw or sin is holding back His Spirit from coming. I can’t think of something more disheartening than to think your not saved because you haven’t had this experience of tongues.
John the Baptist never spoke another tongue yet he was filled with the spirit from his mothers womb. The book of Acts gives us the normal pattern for receiving the Holy Spirit. One thing becomes clear as the texts are looked at carefully, there is no consistent pattern of reception. In order for something to be normative it needs to be consistent and a common thing to all, clearly it is not as proposed by the Oneness view.
If we look carefully through the book of Acts There are only three references to believers speaking in tongues when salvation was given. Acts 2 those in the upper room who did not know what they were waiting for, Acts 10 the spirit falls on them while the message is given and they speak to give evidence to Peter that the gentiles are allowed to enter the Church. And Acts 19
The order for the Jews in Acts 2 was vs.38 repent,vs.41 they gladly received the word then they were baptized publicly in a Christian baptism and received the spirit of promise. Which was the same promise given to the apostles by Jesus in Acts 1:5. The unbelieving Jews were witnesses to God beginning a new entity the Church.
Acts 8 for the Samaritans the order was they believed and were baptized vs.12-17 then they had the apostles lay hands on them and received the Holy Spirit
Acts 10 the gentiles order was as he was speaking the Holy Spirit was given because of their faith that God saw in their hearts vs.44-48 then they were baptized. so we can see each time a different way in which the spirit was given.
Acts 10 opposes the view of having to be baptized first to receive the Spirit as Oneness claims. Are we to believe God poured out his Spirit in the same way as Pentecost on people whose sins were not yet forgiven? Clearly the Spirit is given by grace.
However we find their was a common denominator, they were all saved the same way. By faith
Lets take a journey through the book of Acts and see what transpired in each instance of salvation. Did all speak in tongues were all baptized (in Jesus name) to receive the spirit. What we find will be very productive in understanding the truth.
Acts 2 Death and resurrection are proclaimed 3,000 are saved. as Jews they publicly declare their allegiance to Christ by being baptized and receive the spirit. No tongues for the 3,000.This is important in that so many make tongues the required manifestation to show they were saved. Nowhere does anyone refer to Acts 2 as the model for each time a group or people were saved. Only in Acts 11 does Peter recall what happened to them in the upper room.
Acts 3:18-19 Christ’s death and repentance is the focus for the forgiveness of their sins. In Acts 4:2-4 Jesus & the resurrection is preached, not baptism & again they believed the word & 5,000 were saved. There was no tongues , and no baptism mentioned.
Acts 4:31 tells us they spoke the word boldly when they were filled with the spirit. no tongues, and no baptism mentioned
Acts 8:17 Peter and John come to the Samaritans who had already received the word of God & were baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus and still did not have the spirit. ( Peter needed to be there, he was present for all three groups : Jews, Samaritans and Gentiles) there were no tongues.
Acts 8:37-38 After hearing Isa.53 which is about the death of Jesus he asks to be baptized, Philip reply’s if you believe with all your heart. He confesses Jesus is the son of God. no tongues (maybe he did maybe he didn't.)
Acts 9:17-18 when Paul received salvation he did not speak in tongues until later, yet no one would contest he was saved. When he gives his testimony he refers back to the Damascus road encounter as the time of his Spiritual birth. In vs. 17 it tells us when Ananias laid hands on him he was filled with the Spirit then he was baptized.
(1Cor.15:18, Gal.1:12) He later does speak in tongues as probably all the apostles did.
Acts 10:43 Peter says "To him give all the prophets witness, that through his name whosoever believeth in him shall receive remission of sins.
We have the exact reversal of Acts 2 ,they then received the Spirit from hearing the word & believing, before any baptism. The gentiles speak in tongues as proof of their salvation to some of the unbelieving Jews present who refused to believe they could be partakers of salvation. If no Jews were there would not have been necessary for this sign gift to be manifested. vs.48 they were commanded to be baptized in the name of the Lord.
Acts 11:16-18 Peter recounts the Lord saying about the difference between water baptism and spirit baptism. Vs 17" if therefore God gave them the same gift as he did unto us, when we believed on the Lord Jesus Christ;"
Acts 15 the Jerusalem council was called because some men said that certain parts of the law needed to be obeyed. Vs 8 Peter recounts how the gentiles heard the word of the gospel and believed, God seeing their hearts acknowledged them by giving them the H. Spirit just as he did us. And making no distinction between us & them, purifying their hearts by faith vs.11" We believe that through the grace of the Lord Jesus we shall be saved in the same manner". Notice that Peter makes it clear its by grace and that the gentiles were actually saved being baptized in the Spirit before any confession or baptism. (1 Cor.12:13) Everyone enters into Christ the same way then and today.Eph.1:13 tells us when they believed in the gospel (1 Cor.15:1-4) they were sealed by the Holy Spirit.
Acts 16:31 the Philipian jailer asks what must I do to be saved ? answer believe on the Lord Jesus Christ and you will be saved, you & your household. then they spoke the word of the Lord to both him & his household. No tongues, no baptism until later
What we find in the book of Acts is no set formulae for the giving of the Spirit. What was required in all the accounts was faith. Tongues were not present except in a few instances.
Acts 19 vs.5 they were baptized in the name of the Lord. Jews who only received Johns baptism had not heard of Christ’s death and resurrection nor Pentecost. It is Paul who initiates the conversation on the Holy Spirit. He finds that they are not disciples of Christ but of John, years after they had not heard that the one John was pointing to had already come. After receiving the Gospel they are baptized Paul lays hands on them the Holy Spirit comes upon them and they speak in tongues and prophecy. They did not seek after the Spirit as the Oneness Pentecostals are told, it was a natural occurrence. Not one instance do we see anyone laboring for the Spirit. Why was the Spirit given after Paul laid hands on them. It was to illustrate that they were no longer to follow John the Baptizer but the apostles who now had the leadership role for Israel. The Church with the apostles as their leaders replaced the Sanhedrin and Pharisees and even John.
In each case when tongues are manifested there are Jews present (sometimes in unbelief). The conclusion can only be that that tongues were given primarily as a sign to unbelieving Jews or to those new people groups entering the body. As with Acts 10 they were in unbelief that the gentiles could be saved and so God gave them the Holy Spirit and as proof gave them languages unlearned for evidence to those present. Their conclusion was that they received what they had at Pentecost. In Acts 19 The unbelieving Jews that were only water baptized spoke in tongues was proof to them that Jesus died and resurrected and the Holy Spirit had come.
Tongues is neither the initial evidence of their salvation anymore than prophecy would be. If we take the Oneness Pentecostal attitude to its conclusion …then one must have hands laid on them to receive the spirit and that they must be in groups of twelve to thousands like the other occurrences with tongues instead of single persons. One might even add that fire should appear over their heads as it did at Pentecost. People try to insert other incidents but they are all arguments from silence and are not Scripturally consistent or verifiable .
Acts 26:18 "that they may receive forgiveness of sins, and inheritance among them which are sanctified by faith that is in me. that is in Jesus Christ. The majority of teaching of how to be spiritually born is by faith. The order today is faith, the receiving of the Holy Spirit and our response in baptism. So with a handful of scripture on baptism with over 240 on faith and believe, not including those about Christ’s death we can see how important it is to rightly divide the word.
Is tongues necessary for salvation? No! otherwise we will have to eliminate most of the salvation’s in the book of Acts. It is an evidence but not THE evidence for all.
ROMAN CHAPTER 6 VERSE 23 (KJV) AMEN AMEN AMEN 🙏🙏♥️♥️💯💯
Yes Amen Spirit And Truth Thank You Truth Of God Broadcast Program Pastor Gino Jennings An Elder William Preaching An Teaching Us The Truth 🙏
I was one of the 4 in MN ❤
Praise the living Jesus amen
Wonderful
Amen !!!!
Amen.