28:00. There is 1 equation which makes the connection between the noumenal and the phenomenal. J=H+(-V)+H. This equation connects Will with Representation, Be-ing and the content of Being. J,Jod is pure Be-ing; noumenal side, conscious without reflection and equals H+(-V)+H. H,He is the reflective agent (eg a person, a dissociated point of view) - V, Vau, negating to balance the equation; feminine, imaginative principle, here lies our only freedom, the freedom to change by accepting what you feel, whatever the condition) and H,He, the world, the personal mirror of the agent, which we experience as shared but is actually a reflective unique context of the interaction between agent(H), its intent (V) and awareness (J). This trinitarian logic is idealistic in nature and can serve as a metaphysics to re-connects science to consciousness, behavior to Be-ing.
Very interesting discussion, thanks for uploading. Liked that Francis mentioned physicist Bernard D"Espagnat who has said: ""What quantum mechanics tells us, I believe, is surprising to say the least. It tells us that the basic components of objects - the particles, electrons, quarks etc. - cannot be thought of as "self-existent". The reality that they, and hence all objects, are components of, is merely "empirical reality"." "This reality is something that, while not a purely mind-made construct as radical idealism would have it, can be but the picture our mind forces us to form of ... OF WHAT ? The only answer I am able to provide is that underlying this empirical reality is a mysterious, non-conceptualisable "ultimate reality", not embedded in space and (presumably) not in time either." 1.04.36 Francis knows ancient Greek? Wow!
Very beautiful! Clarification of the transcendent and imminent being one reality…not merely transcendent reality as is the case with Vedanta… also that there is no teacher.. “the teacher disappears when the question is answered”… So much wisdom and truth in this discussion! With heartfelt thanks! 🙏
A very interesting video, as usual! With regard to "the hard problem of consciousness", I would love to hear you interview Donald D. Hoffman (author of "The Case Against Reality")
One can visit Versailles, the garden designed by Le Nôtre with its symmetrical balance and this refreshes and equalises the emotions and calms the mind ⭐️
![Seungmin "그렇게, 천천히, 우리(As we are)" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/kAzmhLHePqU/mqdefault.jpg)
28:00. There is 1 equation which makes the connection between the noumenal and the phenomenal. J=H+(-V)+H. This equation connects Will with Representation, Be-ing and the content of Being.
J,Jod is pure Be-ing; noumenal side, conscious without reflection and equals H+(-V)+H. H,He is the reflective agent (eg a person, a dissociated point of view) - V, Vau, negating to balance the equation; feminine, imaginative principle, here lies our only freedom, the freedom to change by accepting what you feel, whatever the condition) and H,He, the world, the personal mirror of the agent, which we experience as shared but is actually a reflective unique context of the interaction between agent(H), its intent (V) and awareness (J).
This trinitarian logic is idealistic in nature and can serve as a metaphysics to re-connects science to consciousness, behavior to Be-ing.
You don’t see too many Francis interviews. Many thanks Mark
Very interesting discussion, thanks for uploading.
Liked that Francis mentioned physicist Bernard D"Espagnat who has said:
""What quantum mechanics tells us, I believe, is surprising to say the least. It tells us that the basic components of objects - the particles, electrons, quarks etc. - cannot be thought of as "self-existent". The reality that they, and hence all objects, are components of, is merely "empirical reality"."
"This reality is something that, while not a purely mind-made construct as radical idealism would have it, can be but the picture our mind forces us to form of ... OF WHAT ? The only answer I am able to provide is that underlying this empirical reality is a mysterious, non-conceptualisable "ultimate reality", not embedded in space and (presumably) not in time either."
1.04.36 Francis knows ancient Greek? Wow!
Brilliant. Thankyou both of you ✌️
No way! Very pleased you found Francis :)
Very beautiful! Clarification of the transcendent and imminent being one reality…not merely transcendent reality as is the case with Vedanta… also that there is no teacher.. “the teacher disappears when the question is answered”… So much wisdom and truth in this discussion!
With heartfelt thanks! 🙏
Thank you for this rare interview. ❤
Beautiful reply to first question ! Let me listen to the rest 🙏🏼🌼🌸🌻🌹🪷🌷
A very interesting video, as usual! With regard to "the hard problem of consciousness", I would love to hear you interview Donald D. Hoffman (author of "The Case Against Reality")
he already has one with him
Fantastic, thank you v. m.❤❤
One can visit Versailles, the garden designed by Le Nôtre with its symmetrical balance and this refreshes and equalises the emotions and calms the mind ⭐️
I love his first statement
"Where is the wisdom we have lost in knowledge? Where is the knowledge we have lost in information?" T.S. Eliot
Would be curious how a trialog with Josha Bach joining Francis and Mark would go.
The question "how does it work" can only emerge within a very specific mindset. Only a mechanistic mind can come up with that question, interestingly
❤❤
Saint William Blake 😁🙏🙏🙏🙏
🙏🏼🌸🌼🌻🌷🌹
If you can't understand theology or philosophy then try another art or try archeology and see if that helps. They all teach the same thing. ❤
Not particularly convincing