"It all started out as a mild curiosity in a junkyard..." My Hartnell-era marathon begins! Make sure to leave and comment and "like" the video to appease the almighty algorithm! Patrons will get access to ALL reviews for Season 1 early so be sure to check out my page! www.patreon.com/trilbee
You mentioned early in the video about production problems but then said something like "that's a story for another video." Why yes, I would like to see that video!
the sticks aren't meant to be touching when Ian makes fire, he isn't rubbing them together. There's some sort of twine connecting them, by moving the one stick forward and back he rotates the other stick which creates friction and heat at its base from which you make the fire.
Imagine being 7 years old, and watching the first episode. I don't have to imagine. We, the viewers, were thd first to gasp "it's bigger on the inside!". I can't tell you what a shock that was or how brilliantly it was executed. I still remember that moment like it was last Saturday...
I am too young to have experienced that, but I try to imagine what it was like to see live back then. (I'm American, my first exposure to Dr Who was with the Forth Doctor, in the 80s.)
@Neil070. I am with you on this one. I remember it vividly. I also remember my mum not being too sure whether it was something suitable for me to watch. She didn't want me to have nightmares!
William Hartnell was a fascinating actor. For years and years he was typecast as "The Heavy", playing "Tough Guys" - IIRC, he was even called "The British James Cagney" - He finally broke out of that stereotype with his final role as The Doctor.
Susan's hair is interesting, because it hadn't quite become a fashion trend at the time. The BBC hired legendary hairstylist Vidal Sassoon to style her hair, just before he started styling celebrity hair in similar ways, which then made hair like Susan's popular. It's an extremely rare case of sci-fi correctly predicting future fashion, and it only happened because they were perceptive and/or lucky enough to hire a trendsetter *just before* he got famous enough to be far out of their price range.
I came to appreciate the post-episode one Caveman stuff because it immediately equalises the group. The Doctor holds all the cards after Ian and Barbara leave Earth, but it soon becomes a story about a group of people learning how to work together. The Dr goes from a smirking demigod to scared old man. The first life he ever saves in the show is Ian's from the cavemen "if he dies there will be no fire!" And Ian and Barbara see what dealing with them (20th-century human 'primitives') must be like for him through the cavemen. And the Dr appreciates Ian's aptitude for adventures- he's young and brave- things that the Dr will one day become.
While I agree with the fact that Ian and Barbara follow Susan home is a bit dodgy to modern sensibilities, it was common as recently as the 1980s for school staff to have an authority over their pupil's safety, and would have been perfectly common for concerned teachers to distantly observed seemingly troubled students while on their way home. It certainly wasn't considered sinister by the majority of the general public at the time. Your point about Ian's firemaking misses one crucial detail: it's not easy to make out, but there is a piece of twine or, possibly, one of Ian's shoelaces, looped around both sticks, in a figure of eight formation. By moving both sticks simultaneously, with one of them touching the base wood, it allows for ease of control of the fire. Frankly, just rubbing two sticks together would do bugger all. You'd need the friction caused by the tightly-wound twine/shoelace to better help create the flame; which is exactly what happens. Most children watching would be aware of this technique, as they'd either be in the Boy Scouts or the Girl Guides or whatever, where fire-making badges would be routinely presented to the many recipients. Finally, this is a very fine video essay, and I absolutely agree with you on the political subtext of the caveman episodes; very well observed, that.
Yknow, I'd never thought of that word before now but "Imp" is a surprisingly accurate description for this Doctor, even later on when he softens and the whole granddad feel comes through, Imp still feels like a good word for him
Thank you so much. Have always wanted to see An Unearthly Child. My Dad was Assistant Film editor on this first Dr Who episode and I was born the night it was first aired, so it has a special significance for me. ☺❤
Mate, this isn't a mere "review", it's a whole freaking essay! Like in the best way possible, though. This was so well thought-out, with a great balance of historical/behind the scenes facts and personal opinions.. And as always, very eloquently put and amazingly edited. This video got me so hyped for the rest of your Hartnell reviews :)
Watching this on You Tube on November 23, 2023 at exactly the same time as i watched the original broadcast 60 years ago as an 8 year old, how this brought back memories.
I love the "What on Earth's it doing here? these things are usually on the street" line. It's like retroactive exposition for something that would've just been commonplace at the time. Kinda eerie in a way, like they knew people would still be watching it 60 years later.
We never had police boxes round here, though there is now one in a local museum that had been in a pub! They were not commonplace outside London by any means. At 7 years old, I needed that exposition it added to to the mystery and the "creepy" atmosphere. To think, I was a little scared of the Doctor in that first episode.....
Imagine if someone who was on or worked on the show 60 years ago was brought forward in time to see the 60th anniversary special next year. They'd be shocked yet happy to know this series would still be running and so popular all these years later.
The actor who played ian was in jodies final episode and won a guinness world record for longest gap between tv appearances as the same role (57 years) he was also the doorman in An Adventure in Space and Time which came out as part of the 50th anniversary celebrations
Sometimes I think about the original titles being considered "terrifying" and wonder what it'd be like to show 1963 audiences one of the modern intros LOL.
Some people keep bleating on about how Chibnall/Whittaker/Timeless Child ect. would have Hartnell turning in his grave but honestly I think he'd be elated that this silly little sci-fi show is still going after all this time.
Waris Hussein is still around at 84. His story should be told too. A very young director, mid 20's, working with the only female producer in the BBC, he was also Indian by birth, and gay, though that last fact would have been kept quiet....homosexuality was still illegal in 1963, though racial prejudice was not. Doctor Who had everything against it... Incidentally wasn't Ridley Scott also involved in the pilot?
Really enjoyed your review and very much in agreement with your views. I invited Eileen Way to make a convention appearance many years ago. She was quite elderly then, but got the train from Canterbury to Coventry in order to join us for the weekend. She was lovely. Eileen related how Peter Cushing ate at the same restaurant as her, but she was too shy to approach him. My time with her was magical.
I remember it well, i was in the cubs, we played football in the park, lost as usual, then the whole team went back to Arkela's house for game break down, analysis and cups of tea and cake. But somebody knew about this New, Exciting series so we all crammed into his lounge and watched eagerly. I have watched every episode ever since. Wonderful stuff. Some of the sets were a bit naff and were a bit wobbly, but that didn't matter, some of those earlier tales were better than later ones when we went into colour. Things like the early adventures against the Master and the explanation that the Master stole the chameleon circuit, so it stuck as the police box.
The theme is awesome, so subtle and haunting "bring it back now, we won't take less". I think the opening transition from the titles to the policeman almost works - from the electronic fog of the titles to rolling fog around the junkyard. This is one of my most watched episodes.
I was 9 years old when I saw the first episode. I still remember it well today. Watching it in the evening with my parents. It was new and I was captivated and scared at the same time. You reminded me about the first episode being repeated the following week. Yes, I saw it again. By that time, as kids we had talked about it at school and couldn’t wait to see episode 2. Thanks for the nostalgia.
It's a shame that this story didn't leave a first strong impression when it first came out in late 1963, However thanks to Terry Nation with the Daleks the show has reached it's Sci-fi peak.
This is probably one of my favourite Doctor Who stories. There’s this charming quaintness to it that I can’t help but love. That first episode is a masterwork. Most shows like this have kind of a rocky start, like Star Trek did, but they had Doctor Who right there, they got it first go. The rest is fine, nothing that special, but still enjoyable nonetheless.
Fantastic news to have my thoughts on the caveman politics backed up for a change. Adore the (new!) points about the good/bad morality split not existing in this story, because the nature of mankind is so beyond reason. I love Hartnell as the opposite end of the spectrum, a future human man that is nothing BUT cold logic and condescending reason. I think Ian elects Hartnell as the leader because he's equally scared, but quiet about it. It makes sense since he (and we as an audience) are seeing ourselves as superior to the cavemen. Through the parallel we can begin to understand the Doctor's superior perspective, but resonate to Ian and Barbara as the true rational middle man. The Doctor hints in part 1 as to what the rest of the story will be about too, which I never noticed til this video. Its all atmospheric but parts 2-4 are absolutely crucial. I think 1 is unquestionably a human in this, and its a story about progress as an introduction to time trave by showing us all the extremes at once. I think its absolutely genius. So pumped for this series Will, thanks for helping make December the most exciting month of the year as ever. You're the definitive person on this website for me, man. Time to rewatch your Dead Planet video.
Susan's mistake over decimal currency is, with hindsight, wholly understandable. In 1963, the public never imagined that just 8 years later, we would have a decimal system of currency (Feb '71) Susan got her dates wrong by less than a decade.
Although no firm decision had been made by 1963, discussion of decimalisation had been underway for decades. I don't know when the change was finally announced but it was certainly at least a couple of years before the launch date. The 10 shilling note was replaced by the 50p coin in 69 if I recall correctly. The half crown was withdrawn shortly before the 50p appeared reportedly (at least amongst we school boys) because, being larger than the 50p it could have been filed down to fool slot machines. Quite which slot machines would have required such a high value payment is something I didn't consider at the time; cigarettes (for which there machines outside virtually every newsagents) were only a shilling or two per pack and a platform ticket at the station was only 2d.
I just had a fun/crazy thought. Perhaps if they ever do an official colourization of 60s Doctor Who, the 'powers that be' could maybe not colourize most of this episode, leaving it black and white up until Barbara and Ian enter the Tardis and this scene and the rest of the episode transitions into colour, invoking 'The Wizard of Oz' film, I wonder if that were to happen would it work, how might people feel about it and imagine if it was originally possible to do this in the 60s...?
Possible? Probably. Affordable? Probably not. I mean, Wizard of Oz was made in the 30s. I think color TV tech was around at this time, but producing color TV programs might have been more expensive. Not to mention that the upgrade to color was incomplete.
@@badbeardbill9956 you're talking about when the episode was originally made back in the 1963, I'm sorry I wasn't clear on what I meant here. Recently there was talk about some 0f the 60s Doctor Who will be officially being colourized soon (if it hasn't been done or already by now) unless they've abandoned that idea, that was what I was refering to on this.
I really enjoyed this review. William Hartnell was at his best in this story and it really has some great moments. The main cast were truly excellent in this story too. It set the tone for what would follow.
Slight nitpick, but there's actually a string faintly visible and Ian is actually using a bow drill which is a real primitive fire making method. You can find countless videos on RUclips of it.
That's the episode that made a Whovian of me; I had seen random episodes on PBS, mainly the third and fourth Doctors, but around 1990 WANE TV, Fort Wayne's PBS station, announced that they had got the Hartnell episodes, so I tuned in, and was fortunate enough to see "Unearthly Child", which made a Whovian of me!
My favourite Dr. Who, William Hartnell, he played it straight with a knowledgable air and didn’t try to play the fool. Subsequent Doctors were shadows of this original!
I love the Drs comparison of the dimensional space of the TARDIS to a television. That's stayed with me since I first saw this a decade ago. I wish they'd have a modern doctor call back to that.
I remember discovering this on our one channel TV set in the spring of 1964. I was 13 then and had heard nothing about it until one Saturday at 4:30 PM it was on. We thought that was the coolest show ever, exciting and a little scary with that fantastic weird theme song. It just dropped out of the blue and we couldn’t wait to sit breathlessly watching the next episode. Those were the days. Black and white TV . We never anticipated colour TV until it suddenly burst upon us in 1966 and Batman with all its colour was just perfect for that. Dr. Who got lost in the shuffle but he was still big in England when I went there in 1974. That unknown to me was the beginning of my overseas travels for the next 50 years and still not over. But you had to be there in 1964 to experience the zeitgeist of the times. The future full of technological marvels and space travel were all the rage then and James Bond and the early Beatles. It seemed that all the coolest stuff was coming out of England as the Americans were racing to get to the moon. There just is no feeling now of the excitement anticipating what was going to come next that was in the air then. Dr. Who was part of that excitement.
Glad to see a fairly positive review of eps 2-4. I watched them just a couple weeks ago and thought they were much better than the online opinion would have one believe, and I can definitely say I enjoyed it.
I learned a lot more from this than I thought I would. The background on all the people that worked on putting the show together and making it work was splendid, thank you. I do agree with you: the first story gets a bad rap, but it's actually really well done.
32:02 Tbh very likely. You've probably heard this by now, the studios were so cramped and awkward and the sprinklers would go off all the time. The Reign of Terror was apparently a nightmare cause they had to get a horse in.
"55 year old actor (William Hartnell)" It 's still crazy thinking about how Paul McGaan in Night of the Doctor was one year younger than that and David Tenant is 51 currently
I'm looking forward to this marathon. I don't think it gets much credit beyond the highlights. While he has his charm, minus the early episodes, I never saw anyone say Hartnell was their favourite Doctor. But I know he was popular and beloved in the role, in Hartnell's time.
An excellent review, you really bring out the key features of interest/meaning in the scenes. I'd fogotten barbara screaming at a chicken-duck-woman-thing waiting in the bushes of love
Thanks for this. I have always had a memory of the 1st Doctor Who. I was 4yrs 7 months old. From behind the settee. But I had wondered whether it was the first or just my first. It was both. The shadow of the caveman looking at the Tardis is and has been indelibly impressed on my mind for 60yrs 2mths.
Ian's stick wasn't in contact with the other stick to make fire because he was using a 'bow' style tool, we just couldn't see the 'string' in the lighting setup.
Superbly excellent. I agree with every word. Like you, I enjoy the whole story. The sense of eerie contrast, danger and out of time displacement is palpably thrilling.
I haven't seen the full episode but this was great to watch! The Doctor Who Magazine story "Hunters of the Burning Stone" is actually closely linked to this story and the graphic novel includes the writer's thoughts on this story, which I'd always found interesting.
2:32 I had no idea Bill and Ben was originally a black and white show. I remember the 2000s one I watched when I was a kid (how the years have gone by) but this was a surprise for me.
I really hope that Kal and the tribe of Gum appear in Archive Footage or even a mention someday as they are the very first enemies featured in the show
Fantastic review as always. I definitely recommend becoming a patreon, well worth it. MrTardis, could you possibly look at including the interview with William Hartnell recorded during pantomime shortly after he left doctor who? Its really fascinating. I'd love to hear your analysis of it. Thanks
The first episode is genuinely one of the best individual episodes of all of Doctor Who it does such a wonderful job introducing the premise and characters that almost anything that came immediately afterwards was going to feel like a let down.
I recommend: An Adventure In Space & Time (2013). A dramatisation of the early years of Doctor Who (1963), with the story revolving around BBC executive Sydney Newman, novice producer Verity Lambert and actor William Hartnell.
I'm still mad that An Unearthly Child has only appeared in a Flashback/ Archive Footage once throughout it's 60 years. The Cave of Skulls Footage was reused for a millisecond in "The Timeless Children". Although An Unearthly Child sound clips can be heard in "Journey to the Centre of the Tardis" and "The Name of the Doctor" and photos of BTS photos of the story as a whole can be seen in "Day of the Daleks", "The Day of the Doctor", "The Zygon Inversion", "The Pilot", "Thin Ice", and "Oxygen".
An unearthly child was one of the first classic doctor who storys I even saw and an unearthly child is my favourite William hartnell story doctor who and I love this story alot and It Is a good introduction to the tardis and the first doctor and ian and Susan and Barbara and tv show i first watch this story in 2020 with my dad and I was the first William Hartnell doctor who story i even saw and I love it alot
What I find funny about the first episode is the one thing that most people overlook,this confirms that the TARDIS used to be able to change physical form and gets stuck as the Police Box,most people overlook or miss that
I was thrilled back when these were released for home video. Living in the US PBS was my first source for DW. (#4!) Loved this essay, but one bone to pick. Ian's sticks weren't touching because he was using the Bow - Drill base method for starting a fire. The bow spins the upright stick creating the friction to cause combustion.
I remember the showing, and re-showing, of that first episode. I was 15 years old, had just left school, as you could back then, and I had just started my first job. Seems like only yesterday.
I remember seeing this at my friend Charlie's house. when it was first broadcast. I wish I had a time machine to go back, watch it again and tell my past self all about the 60 year history of Dr. Who..
I can vividly remember seeing Doctor Who for the very first time, my initial impression was that it was something different, something special. But I must admit it took me a considerable time watching the programme to come around to William Hartnell's portrayal of the Doctor. For some time I watched Doctor Who in spite of William Hartnell rather than because of him. However, I eventually did warm to him somewhat, rather like I would accept him as a rather irascible Grandfather figure than a loveable one. It is for that reason that I consider Patrick Troughton to be my first relateable Doctor rather than Hartnell.
I had recently turned 12 in November, 1963 and remember seeing these early episodes fresh out of the box as it were. For some reason, New Zealand was the first country outside of the UK to screen Dr Who on its then fledgling one-only television channel. We kids weren't aware of that, of course. The theme music was like nothing we had ever heard - because there was literally nothing like it on TV, or radio. Hartnell's Doctor was a scary old man in many ways, not at all the wholesome hero type. I remember the series being very intense and dark. I was used to the serial format because we'd watch serials at the cinema every Saturday morning; they were also black and white. It was the Daleks that scared the hell out of me back then, with their implacable and relentless urge to kill anything that moved. I was a dedicated Whovian I suppose by the time Hartnell was replaced by another very grumpy version in the form of Patrick Troughton. Watching Hartnell now, in these excerpts, I cannot help comparing some of his expressions to, of all people, Tilda Swinton! She's 63, and an almost perfect match in age to the Doctor. Comparing photos of her to Hartnell, I find a compelling similarity. She's no stranger to impersonating males, eg Dr. Josef Klemperer in "Suspiria", and I find myself thinking what a fascinating twist she would be as the Doctor. Given a decent script.
November 23 1963. There was a lot of time travel activity surrounding that date. It is no surprise to me that Dr. Who would premier one day later. The thoughts and awareness of our subconscious minds often bubbles up in our media which can cause the synchronicity of the universe to seem almost spooky at times.
I love the 1st episode but I feel the remaining three fall flat although the radiation danger cliffhanger is probably one of the most ominous in the show's history.
I just rewatched this series with a new to classic who friend yesterday. She adored the first episode and we had fun with 2-4. They are very entertaining if you are watching with a friend. The companion stuff is great! The other all plot is… not good. Quite funny, but hard to take seriously. And as I have a degree in history with a minor in anthropology if I tried to take it seriously I would pull out my own hair. So if you go in knowing there is a really shift in the story you can have fun.
I'm surprised nobody ever makes the Prometheus comparison to The Doctor here. The Doctor being Prometheus makes _so much sense_ for everything that came after this. The Doctor brings fire to humanity, and thus brings civilization. The Doctor created that which would one day usurp the Time Lords themselves, since Nu Who introduced in the background a human-run time travel agency who are doing what the Time Lords once did for the universe. 28:47 I agree it works but I don't even see it as The Doctor and Ian keeping themselves together. The Doctor is barely keeping himself from falling into what we'd later know as Time Lord Victorious behavior and that's only because Ian is keeping him under control as a morality chain, since there's no way The Doctor will let Ian be out and out overtly the better man. Ian meanwhile is barely keeping it together by actively taking responsibility only via foisting the burden of results on The Doctor. Ian telling them The Doctor is their leader is Ian rejecting culpability for his actions. All four of them are breaking under pressure, they just break differently. The Doctor's first appearance sets up the evil nature inside him that he will wrestle with for the rest of the show, and immediately establishes that he is _not_ a good man. He doesn't yet have his rules to guide him, all he has is shame. Ian is reluctant to take control, but also _must_ take control and he keeps this going via a mountain of denialism. Barbara has the most rational perspective of the team and that breaks her because she's the only one able to really comprehend just how screwed their situation is. She is doing the sane and rational thing to do in the situation. Susan is a child who has gone from Time Lord to pretending to be a human to being a castaway in the dung and dirt of time, having fallen further from grace than any being in the universe.
I much preferred the first pilot. There was a strangeness and menace. I think the first part really holds up. The caveman part is good for character development, but is very much of its time, while the earlier part is timeless, and holds up as something that could air today.
I remember rushing home with my friend to watch the first episode (we were both 11yrs old). There must have been a lot of publicity over it because we definitely were eager to watch it.
I seem to recall that, not only was the opening episode affected by news of the JFK assassination, but a fair chunk of the audience was also cut off due to TV transmitter failures.
The first episode was repeated the following Saturday, because a lot of people missed it. The JFK assassination was a midweek thing, when, in the middle of a show, the screen cut to a still of the White House and a voice said “according to the voice of America, President Kennedy is dead”. It was approximately 8:15 in the evening and I seem to remember, it was a Wednesday.
I have a vague memory that thia episode was to be known as "A child of the stars". I remember watching this, aged 8, and again the following Saturday night, then every episode since, so I was "in" from the beginning !
If this episode hadn't been so good, I probably wouldn't have watched as much Classic Who as I did. I watched most of the First Doctor's run, some of the Second, and was just barely starting the Third. I really need to get back into it!
So I'm sure someone's already said this, but at 31:55, Ian is making fire the correct survival way using the two sticks and shoelace (which you can just about see if you look closely). Basically instead of rubbing two sticks together, you make a bow out of one stick with the shoelace on either end, then twist the other stick in the tightened shoelace and hold it in place with a flat stone, if done correctly when you move the bow stick back and forth and it spins the stick twisted in the shoelace as it's being held in place, and the friction that it caused is basically bettter than any other hand-spun method of making fire. If that was a joke, I'm sorry for explaining why it's not funny, but I just wanted to point that out and explain the basics of it because its an incredibly handy survival tool.
its lovely getting the marathon a lovely start! its nce to have you touch on he fact that the caveman scenes are really gripping and still compaling! what i think really puts doctor who as a good show, is the fact that they give so much story and compeling ellements to the time period! this coud have easaly been the case of amaing main characters and skipping through scenes that they are not in, but the show immidiatly sets a higher bar then you thought through making the dialog as smart and complelling, filled with a lot more respect then expected to the cave man! its such a good way to sement doctor who! the quality of the main characters is almos t as good as the supporting cast
Here's an incredible fact that we cannot begin to appreciate today: the UK had food rationing until 1954. 1954! Just 2-3 years after food rationing ended, the British (and French) empires came to an end when US President Eisenhower ordered British, French, and Israeli forces to cease their attacks in the Suez incident. I also contend to understand what the UK was about at that time, watch movies such as Alfie or Georgy Girl. We have a combination of a fallen empire where the people are contemplating if they will have part of the technologically advanced and prosperous future that may be just out of reach for them. I also contend that is why going to meeting cavemen is exactly the right place to go given the times. The entire UK people are being told they are now going to go out into the world no longer with the protection of empire, that empire will not be around to get them out of trouble with the natives. That is how First, the Doctor is -- a being no longer protected by empire, lost in the former colonies among the natives.
How I wish in billions of ways, I had been born in the year 1963 or even born years earlier than 1963 so I could have been alive to see the early black and white Dr Who stories. I first started to watch Dr Who, in the early 1970s aged 3 when Jon Pertwee was the Dr.
For a scholarly essay about the political thrust of Classic Doctor Who, listen to the video (audio) essay: ruclips.net/video/go7jMkKIajY/видео.html Here, Jon Bigger sets out the case for an anarchist "exploration" of the show (not necessarily communist, as alluded in this video, but revolutionary nonetheless). Later in the video, Bigger explores how these anarchistic aspects were dropped in the current 2015 reboot of the show, leading many lovers of Classic Who to form negative views about New Who over recent years.
I saw both versions of the pilot when they were first transmitted way back in November 1963 I saw second version in a darkened room in front of a blazing coal fire a week after the 1st.
28:40 I would say timeless and relatable and something humankind can’t shake off, not necessarily dated. Susan could have had a little more fortitude but Barbara indeed was out of her depth, though she is more level headed than Susan. Also, in my mind though correct me if I’m wrong, I assume Susan is a Time Lady, shouldn’t she be far more mature than a human assuming she is a few hundred years old? I know the regeneration thing was a later idea as with the Time Lord concept but if she has been travelling with the Doctor, wouldn’t she be a bit more… used to danger? Not careless but wary?
I will die on this hill, An Unearthly Child, the episode, is one of the best in B&W era, it's truely an ICONIC episode, the rest of the serial? ehhhh, I thought for, MANY, years after I first saw it, that it was a 6 Part adventure, and, i feel like thats an achievement
Brilliant , I was 7 years Old I Remember The Opening Music and Visuals , and just being Draw In . William Hartnell , and Tom Baker where the Best `Doctors ` in my Humble Opinion .
When I saw this in the 80's on the local PBS station, they didn't show the cavemen episodes at all, but instead went directly into The Daleks. And I seem to remember a Doctor Who book at the time listed all of the serials in order, and had the first one as An Earthly Child/The Dead Planet, the latter, I believe, being the name of the first episode of The Daleks. So I'm wondering if at the time, the BBC felt that those episodes weren't good enough, and retconned them away.
At the first Dr. Who Convention in California, my SFX company sent our robot to greet Tom Baker at the airport. Tom walked up to it, shook its claw and said "I believe I have met you before"....I also met Johnathan there and briefly broached the idea of an American Dr, with not much positive response.....
"It all started out as a mild curiosity in a junkyard..."
My Hartnell-era marathon begins! Make sure to leave and comment and "like" the video to appease the almighty algorithm!
Patrons will get access to ALL reviews for Season 1 early so be sure to check out my page! www.patreon.com/trilbee
“But now it’s turned out to be quite a… quite a great spirit of adventure, don’t you think?”
Subscribed! Great video! (I'd suggest you pin YOUR comment to the top!)
You mentioned early in the video about production problems but then said something like "that's a story for another video." Why yes, I would like to see that video!
@@marienbad2 I followed up with that video! It's about the unaired pilot :) You can find it on my channel from a few weeks ago!
@@MrTARDIS cool - I have just loaded it up and am gonna watch it now! Thanks for the update!
the sticks aren't meant to be touching when Ian makes fire, he isn't rubbing them together. There's some sort of twine connecting them, by moving the one stick forward and back he rotates the other stick which creates friction and heat at its base from which you make the fire.
What a shame he forgot to bring along the Bic.
Exactly, it's a bow drill for starting a fire.
Good thing Doc carries some robust twine in his pocket next to the sonic screwdriver! Brilliant review - thanks!
String, string is a marvellous thing, rope is thicker, but string is quicker. @@TomPauls007
@@TomPauls007the doc has deus ex scified way crazier bullshit honestly
Imagine being 7 years old, and watching the first episode. I don't have to imagine. We, the viewers, were thd first to gasp "it's bigger on the inside!".
I can't tell you what a shock that was or how brilliantly it was executed. I still remember that moment like it was last Saturday...
I am too young to have experienced that, but I try to imagine what it was like to see live back then. (I'm American, my first exposure to Dr Who was with the Forth Doctor, in the 80s.)
Glad you sat back in awe. Insert joke about the Sabbath and… bing! 😅
I bet you hid behind the sofa (most of us did ) when the `DARLEKS` appeared
@@1tonyboat Ha. I didn’t. They’re just human.
@Neil070. I am with you on this one. I remember it vividly. I also remember my mum not being too sure whether it was something suitable for me to watch. She didn't want me to have nightmares!
William Hartnell was a fascinating actor. For years and years he was typecast as "The Heavy", playing "Tough Guys" - IIRC, he was even called "The British James Cagney" - He finally broke out of that stereotype with his final role as The Doctor.
Susan's hair is interesting, because it hadn't quite become a fashion trend at the time. The BBC hired legendary hairstylist Vidal Sassoon to style her hair, just before he started styling celebrity hair in similar ways, which then made hair like Susan's popular. It's an extremely rare case of sci-fi correctly predicting future fashion, and it only happened because they were perceptive and/or lucky enough to hire a trendsetter *just before* he got famous enough to be far out of their price range.
Jacqueline Hill's hair is very Jackie Kennedy-ish.
@@UnchainedAmericaher hair is very early 1960s but Susan's is more of the later decade
I came to appreciate the post-episode one Caveman stuff because it immediately equalises the group. The Doctor holds all the cards after Ian and Barbara leave Earth, but it soon becomes a story about a group of people learning how to work together. The Dr goes from a smirking demigod to scared old man. The first life he ever saves in the show is Ian's from the cavemen "if he dies there will be no fire!" And Ian and Barbara see what dealing with them (20th-century human 'primitives') must be like for him through the cavemen. And the Dr appreciates Ian's aptitude for adventures- he's young and brave- things that the Dr will one day become.
Fancy seeing you here!
@@StayOnTarget. I get around
Wow. William Hartnell was younger in An Unearthly Child than Sophie Aldred was in Power of the Doctor!
Same age Peter Capaldi was when he took the role. They poke fun at in Twice Upon A Time
@@roguebritgravy1 weird because David Bradley was 75 at the time
William Hartnell had pretty bad health which makes himn apear older then he really was.
Holy crap
@@robotx9285 He was also wearing a wig as the First Doctor. If I recall correctly, he had short hair normally.
While I agree with the fact that Ian and Barbara follow Susan home is a bit dodgy to modern sensibilities, it was common as recently as the 1980s for school staff to have an authority over their pupil's safety, and would have been perfectly common for concerned teachers to distantly observed seemingly troubled students while on their way home. It certainly wasn't considered sinister by the majority of the general public at the time.
Your point about Ian's firemaking misses one crucial detail: it's not easy to make out, but there is a piece of twine or, possibly, one of Ian's shoelaces, looped around both sticks, in a figure of eight formation. By moving both sticks simultaneously, with one of them touching the base wood, it allows for ease of control of the fire. Frankly, just rubbing two sticks together would do bugger all. You'd need the friction caused by the tightly-wound twine/shoelace to better help create the flame; which is exactly what happens. Most children watching would be aware of this technique, as they'd either be in the Boy Scouts or the Girl Guides or whatever, where fire-making badges would be routinely presented to the many recipients.
Finally, this is a very fine video essay, and I absolutely agree with you on the political subtext of the caveman episodes; very well observed, that.
Yknow, I'd never thought of that word before now but "Imp" is a surprisingly accurate description for this Doctor, even later on when he softens and the whole granddad feel comes through, Imp still feels like a good word for him
He keeps his trickster attitude when interacting with everyone other than his close friends, and I love it.
Thank you so much. Have always wanted to see An Unearthly Child. My Dad was Assistant Film editor on this first Dr Who episode and I was born the night it was first aired, so it has a special significance for me. ☺❤
Mate, this isn't a mere "review", it's a whole freaking essay! Like in the best way possible, though.
This was so well thought-out, with a great balance of historical/behind the scenes facts and personal opinions.. And as always, very eloquently put and amazingly edited.
This video got me so hyped for the rest of your Hartnell reviews :)
Watching this on You Tube on November 23, 2023 at exactly the same time as i watched the original broadcast 60 years ago as an 8 year old, how this brought back memories.
I love the "What on Earth's it doing here? these things are usually on the street" line. It's like retroactive exposition for something that would've just been commonplace at the time.
Kinda eerie in a way, like they knew people would still be watching it 60 years later.
We never had police boxes round here, though there is now one in a local museum that had been in a pub! They were not commonplace outside London by any means.
At 7 years old, I needed that exposition it added to to the mystery and the "creepy" atmosphere. To think, I was a little scared of the Doctor in that first episode.....
@@Neil070 Thank you for that added context, that makes sense :)
Imagine if someone who was on or worked on the show 60 years ago was brought forward in time to see the 60th anniversary special next year. They'd be shocked yet happy to know this series would still be running and so popular all these years later.
The actor who played ian was in jodies final episode and won a guinness world record for longest gap between tv appearances as the same role (57 years) he was also the doorman in An Adventure in Space and Time which came out as part of the 50th anniversary celebrations
Sometimes I think about the original titles being considered "terrifying" and wonder what it'd be like to show 1963 audiences one of the modern intros LOL.
I’m assuming ur on about Ian
Some people keep bleating on about how Chibnall/Whittaker/Timeless Child ect. would have Hartnell turning in his grave but honestly I think he'd be elated that this silly little sci-fi show is still going after all this time.
Waris Hussein is still around at 84. His story should be told too. A very young director, mid 20's, working with the only female producer in the BBC, he was also Indian by birth, and gay, though that last fact would have been kept quiet....homosexuality was still illegal in 1963, though racial prejudice was not.
Doctor Who had everything against it...
Incidentally wasn't Ridley Scott also involved in the pilot?
Really enjoyed your review and very much in agreement with your views. I invited Eileen Way to make a convention appearance many years ago. She was quite elderly then, but got the train from Canterbury to Coventry in order to join us for the weekend. She was lovely. Eileen related how Peter Cushing ate at the same restaurant as her, but she was too shy to approach him. My time with her was magical.
I remember it well, i was in the cubs, we played football in the park, lost as usual, then the whole team went back to Arkela's house for game break down, analysis and cups of tea and cake. But somebody knew about this New, Exciting series so we all crammed into his lounge and watched eagerly. I have watched every episode ever since. Wonderful stuff. Some of the sets were a bit naff and were a bit wobbly, but that didn't matter, some of those earlier tales were better than later ones when we went into colour. Things like the early adventures against the Master and the explanation that the Master stole the chameleon circuit, so it stuck as the police box.
The theme is awesome, so subtle and haunting "bring it back now, we won't take less". I think the opening transition from the titles to the policeman almost works - from the electronic fog of the titles to rolling fog around the junkyard. This is one of my most watched episodes.
I was 9 years old when I saw the first episode. I still remember it well today. Watching it in the evening with my parents. It was new and I was captivated and scared at the same time. You reminded me about the first episode being repeated the following week. Yes, I saw it again. By that time, as kids we had talked about it at school and couldn’t wait to see episode 2.
Thanks for the nostalgia.
It's a shame that this story didn't leave a first strong impression when it first came out in late 1963, However thanks to Terry Nation with the Daleks the show has reached it's Sci-fi peak.
This is probably one of my favourite Doctor Who stories. There’s this charming quaintness to it that I can’t help but love. That first episode is a masterwork. Most shows like this have kind of a rocky start, like Star Trek did, but they had Doctor Who right there, they got it first go. The rest is fine, nothing that special, but still enjoyable nonetheless.
Fantastic news to have my thoughts on the caveman politics backed up for a change. Adore the (new!) points about the good/bad morality split not existing in this story, because the nature of mankind is so beyond reason.
I love Hartnell as the opposite end of the spectrum, a future human man that is nothing BUT cold logic and condescending reason. I think Ian elects Hartnell as the leader because he's equally scared, but quiet about it. It makes sense since he (and we as an audience) are seeing ourselves as superior to the cavemen. Through the parallel we can begin to understand the Doctor's superior perspective, but resonate to Ian and Barbara as the true rational middle man. The Doctor hints in part 1 as to what the rest of the story will be about too, which I never noticed til this video.
Its all atmospheric but parts 2-4 are absolutely crucial. I think 1 is unquestionably a human in this, and its a story about progress as an introduction to time trave by showing us all the extremes at once. I think its absolutely genius.
So pumped for this series Will, thanks for helping make December the most exciting month of the year as ever. You're the definitive person on this website for me, man. Time to rewatch your Dead Planet video.
Susan's mistake over decimal currency is, with hindsight, wholly understandable. In 1963, the public never imagined that just 8 years later, we would have a decimal system of currency (Feb '71)
Susan got her dates wrong by less than a decade.
Although no firm decision had been made by 1963, discussion of decimalisation had been underway for decades. I don't know when the change was finally announced but it was certainly at least a couple of years before the launch date. The 10 shilling note was replaced by the 50p coin in 69 if I recall correctly. The half crown was withdrawn shortly before the 50p appeared reportedly (at least amongst we school boys) because, being larger than the 50p it could have been filed down to fool slot machines. Quite which slot machines would have required such a high value payment is something I didn't consider at the time; cigarettes (for which there machines outside virtually every newsagents) were only a shilling or two per pack and a platform ticket at the station was only 2d.
I just had a fun/crazy thought. Perhaps if they ever do an official colourization of 60s Doctor Who, the 'powers that be' could maybe not colourize most of this episode, leaving it black and white up until Barbara and Ian enter the Tardis and this scene and the rest of the episode transitions into colour, invoking 'The Wizard of Oz' film, I wonder if that were to happen would it work, how might people feel about it and imagine if it was originally possible to do this in the 60s...?
Possible? Probably. Affordable? Probably not. I mean, Wizard of Oz was made in the 30s. I think color TV tech was around at this time, but producing color TV programs might have been more expensive. Not to mention that the upgrade to color was incomplete.
@@badbeardbill9956 you're talking about when the episode was originally made back in the 1963, I'm sorry I wasn't clear on what I meant here. Recently there was talk about some 0f the 60s Doctor Who will be officially being colourized soon (if it hasn't been done or already by now) unless they've abandoned that idea, that was what I was refering to on this.
@@owenwildish331 You asked if it was originally possible in the 60s
@@badbeardbill9956 read my first comment again I didn't say in I said of
@@owenwildish331 Quoting you: “…imagine if it was originally possible to do this in the 60s…?”
I really enjoyed this review. William Hartnell was at his best in this story and it really has some great moments. The main cast were truly excellent in this story too. It set the tone for what would follow.
Slight nitpick, but there's actually a string faintly visible and Ian is actually using a bow drill which is a real primitive fire making method. You can find countless videos on RUclips of it.
That's the episode that made a Whovian of me; I had seen random episodes on PBS, mainly the third and fourth Doctors, but around 1990 WANE TV, Fort Wayne's PBS station, announced that they had got the Hartnell episodes, so I tuned in, and was fortunate enough to see "Unearthly Child", which made a Whovian of me!
I am really looking forward to this series. Great to look back at the Hartnell era since so many episodes are lost to posterity.
My favourite Dr. Who, William Hartnell, he played it straight with a knowledgable air and didn’t try to play the fool. Subsequent Doctors were shadows of this original!
I love the Drs comparison of the dimensional space of the TARDIS to a television. That's stayed with me since I first saw this a decade ago. I wish they'd have a modern doctor call back to that.
I remember discovering this on our one channel TV set in the spring of 1964. I was 13 then and had heard nothing about it until one Saturday at 4:30 PM it was on. We thought that was the coolest show ever, exciting and a little scary with that fantastic weird theme song. It just dropped out of the blue and we couldn’t wait to sit breathlessly watching the next episode. Those were the days. Black and white TV . We never anticipated colour TV until it suddenly burst upon us in 1966 and Batman with all its colour was just perfect for that. Dr. Who got lost in the shuffle but he was still big in England when I went there in 1974. That unknown to me was the beginning of my overseas travels for the next 50 years and still not over. But you had to be there in 1964 to experience the zeitgeist of the times. The future full of technological marvels and space travel were all the rage then and James Bond and the early Beatles. It seemed that all the coolest stuff was coming out of England as the Americans were racing to get to the moon. There just is no feeling now of the excitement anticipating what was going to come next that was in the air then. Dr. Who was part of that excitement.
Glad to see a fairly positive review of eps 2-4. I watched them just a couple weeks ago and thought they were much better than the online opinion would have one believe, and I can definitely say I enjoyed it.
I agree, overall good review but a bit odd. Criticizing the 'objectification of women'? Crickey, they're just trying to tell a caveman story.
I learned a lot more from this than I thought I would. The background on all the people that worked on putting the show together and making it work was splendid, thank you.
I do agree with you: the first story gets a bad rap, but it's actually really well done.
All four episodes are great. Very atmospheric.
32:02 Tbh very likely. You've probably heard this by now, the studios were so cramped and awkward and the sprinklers would go off all the time. The Reign of Terror was apparently a nightmare cause they had to get a horse in.
No, it's actually a bow drill. It's a real primitive fire making method
Ian is using his shoelaces tied to the sticks to make the fire, the friction point is at the bottom of the vertical stick. Great essay. Thank you.
"55 year old actor (William Hartnell)" It 's still crazy thinking about how Paul McGaan in Night of the Doctor was one year younger than that and David Tenant is 51 currently
I'm looking forward to this marathon. I don't think it gets much credit beyond the highlights.
While he has his charm, minus the early episodes, I never saw anyone say Hartnell was their favourite Doctor. But I know he was popular and beloved in the role, in Hartnell's time.
This is such a great video. Really well put together
An excellent review, you really bring out the key features of interest/meaning in the scenes. I'd fogotten barbara screaming at a chicken-duck-woman-thing waiting in the bushes of love
Thanks for this. I have always had a memory of the 1st Doctor Who. I was 4yrs 7 months old. From behind the settee. But I had wondered whether it was the first or just my first. It was both. The shadow of the caveman looking at the Tardis is and has been indelibly impressed on my mind for 60yrs 2mths.
Ian's stick wasn't in contact with the other stick to make fire because he was using a 'bow' style tool, we just couldn't see the 'string' in the lighting setup.
Superbly excellent. I agree with every word. Like you, I enjoy the whole story. The sense of eerie contrast, danger and out of time displacement is palpably thrilling.
I haven't seen the full episode but this was great to watch! The Doctor Who Magazine story "Hunters of the Burning Stone" is actually closely linked to this story and the graphic novel includes the writer's thoughts on this story, which I'd always found interesting.
Well it has began.. Hartnell-cember, I'm calling that name now.
2:32 I had no idea Bill and Ben was originally a black and white show. I remember the 2000s one I watched when I was a kid (how the years have gone by) but this was a surprise for me.
I do know they remade it in colour 😅
I really hope that Kal and the tribe of Gum appear in Archive Footage or even a mention someday as they are the very first enemies featured in the show
I like the way your reviews really bring the stories to life- now-where did i put that Early Years DVD box set...
Fantastic review as always. I definitely recommend becoming a patreon, well worth it. MrTardis, could you possibly look at including the interview with William Hartnell recorded during pantomime shortly after he left doctor who? Its really fascinating. I'd love to hear your analysis of it. Thanks
I always wondered about the start of Dr Who. Well done.Thanks.
Bow drills don’t touch. There is more than just 2 sticks.
The first episode is genuinely one of the best individual episodes of all of Doctor Who it does such a wonderful job introducing the premise and characters that almost anything that came immediately afterwards was going to feel like a let down.
I recommend: An Adventure In Space & Time (2013).
A dramatisation of the early years of Doctor Who (1963), with the story revolving around BBC executive Sydney Newman, novice producer Verity Lambert and actor William Hartnell.
That Was a Superb Production .
I'm still mad that An Unearthly Child has only appeared in a Flashback/ Archive Footage once throughout it's 60 years.
The Cave of Skulls Footage was reused for a millisecond in "The Timeless Children". Although An Unearthly Child sound clips can be heard in "Journey to the Centre of the Tardis" and "The Name of the Doctor" and photos of BTS photos of the story as a whole can be seen in "Day of the Daleks", "The Day of the Doctor", "The Zygon Inversion", "The Pilot", "Thin Ice", and "Oxygen".
An unearthly child was one of the first classic doctor who storys I even saw and an unearthly child is my favourite William hartnell story doctor who and I love this story alot and It Is a good introduction to the tardis and the first doctor and ian and Susan and Barbara and tv show i first watch this story in 2020 with my dad and I was the first William Hartnell doctor who story i even saw and I love it alot
Off to a great start. Really looking forward to the rest.
What I find funny about the first episode is the one thing that most people overlook,this confirms that the TARDIS used to be able to change physical form and gets stuck as the Police Box,most people overlook or miss that
It’s obviously a Tavistock thing, I just haven’t worked out what the intended message was.
I was thrilled back when these were released for home video. Living in the US PBS was my first source for DW. (#4!) Loved this essay, but one bone to pick. Ian's sticks weren't touching because he was using the Bow - Drill base method for starting a fire. The bow spins the upright stick creating the friction to cause combustion.
First year I'll be following one of these marathons as it airs. Really excited 😊
I remember the showing, and re-showing, of that first episode. I was 15 years old, had just left school, as you could back then, and I had just started my first job. Seems like only yesterday.
I remember seeing this at my friend Charlie's house. when it was first broadcast.
I wish I had a time machine to go back, watch it again and tell my past self all about the 60 year history of Dr. Who..
As of 2024, William Russell (99) and Carole Ann Ford (85) are the remaining surviving main cast members.
Umm William russell I don't know what to tell you mate
I can vividly remember seeing Doctor Who for the very first time, my initial impression was that it was something different, something special. But I must admit it took me a considerable time watching the programme to come around to William Hartnell's portrayal of the Doctor. For some time I watched Doctor Who in spite of William Hartnell rather than because of him. However, I eventually did warm to him somewhat, rather like I would accept him as a rather irascible Grandfather figure than a loveable one. It is for that reason that I consider Patrick Troughton to be my first relateable Doctor rather than Hartnell.
I had recently turned 12 in November, 1963 and remember seeing these early episodes fresh out of the box as it were. For some reason, New Zealand was the first country outside of the UK to screen Dr Who on its then fledgling one-only television channel. We kids weren't aware of that, of course. The theme music was like nothing we had ever heard - because there was literally nothing like it on TV, or radio. Hartnell's Doctor was a scary old man in many ways, not at all the wholesome hero type. I remember the series being very intense and dark. I was used to the serial format because we'd watch serials at the cinema every Saturday morning; they were also black and white. It was the Daleks that scared the hell out of me back then, with their implacable and relentless urge to kill anything that moved. I was a dedicated Whovian I suppose by the time Hartnell was replaced by another very grumpy version in the form of Patrick Troughton.
Watching Hartnell now, in these excerpts, I cannot help comparing some of his expressions to, of all people, Tilda Swinton! She's 63, and an almost perfect match in age to the Doctor. Comparing photos of her to Hartnell, I find a compelling similarity. She's no stranger to impersonating males, eg Dr. Josef Klemperer in "Suspiria", and I find myself thinking what a fascinating twist she would be as the Doctor. Given a decent script.
November 23 1963.
There was a lot of time travel activity surrounding that date. It is no surprise to me that Dr. Who would premier one day later. The thoughts and awareness of our subconscious minds often bubbles up in our media which can cause the synchronicity of the universe to seem almost spooky at times.
I love the 1st episode but I feel the remaining three fall flat although the radiation danger cliffhanger is probably one of the most ominous in the show's history.
I just ordered this on dvd. Since the digital will be removed, and I’ve only seen it once.
I just rewatched this series with a new to classic who friend yesterday. She adored the first episode and we had fun with 2-4. They are very entertaining if you are watching with a friend. The companion stuff is great! The other all plot is… not good. Quite funny, but hard to take seriously. And as I have a degree in history with a minor in anthropology if I tried to take it seriously I would pull out my own hair.
So if you go in knowing there is a really shift in the story you can have fun.
The two sticks are not touching each other because there is a string connecting the two sticks causing the vertical stick to spin.
I'm surprised nobody ever makes the Prometheus comparison to The Doctor here. The Doctor being Prometheus makes _so much sense_ for everything that came after this. The Doctor brings fire to humanity, and thus brings civilization. The Doctor created that which would one day usurp the Time Lords themselves, since Nu Who introduced in the background a human-run time travel agency who are doing what the Time Lords once did for the universe.
28:47 I agree it works but I don't even see it as The Doctor and Ian keeping themselves together. The Doctor is barely keeping himself from falling into what we'd later know as Time Lord Victorious behavior and that's only because Ian is keeping him under control as a morality chain, since there's no way The Doctor will let Ian be out and out overtly the better man. Ian meanwhile is barely keeping it together by actively taking responsibility only via foisting the burden of results on The Doctor. Ian telling them The Doctor is their leader is Ian rejecting culpability for his actions. All four of them are breaking under pressure, they just break differently.
The Doctor's first appearance sets up the evil nature inside him that he will wrestle with for the rest of the show, and immediately establishes that he is _not_ a good man. He doesn't yet have his rules to guide him, all he has is shame. Ian is reluctant to take control, but also _must_ take control and he keeps this going via a mountain of denialism. Barbara has the most rational perspective of the team and that breaks her because she's the only one able to really comprehend just how screwed their situation is. She is doing the sane and rational thing to do in the situation. Susan is a child who has gone from Time Lord to pretending to be a human to being a castaway in the dung and dirt of time, having fallen further from grace than any being in the universe.
I much preferred the first pilot. There was a strangeness and menace. I think the first part really holds up. The caveman part is good for character development, but is very much of its time, while the earlier part is timeless, and holds up as something that could air today.
I remember rushing home with my friend to watch the first episode (we were both 11yrs old). There must have been a lot of publicity over it because we definitely were eager to watch it.
I seem to recall that, not only was the opening episode affected by news of the JFK assassination, but a fair chunk of the audience was also cut off due to TV transmitter failures.
The first episode was repeated the following Saturday, because a lot of people missed it.
The JFK assassination was a midweek thing, when, in the middle of a show, the screen cut to a still of the White House and a voice said “according to the voice of America, President Kennedy is dead”.
It was approximately 8:15 in the evening and I seem to remember, it was a Wednesday.
@@toku_floyd Friday, Nov 22, 1963
“The Long Way Round”
Great review. Selfishly I'd like you to just keep going right up to present day hahaha but a herculean effort indeed!
I have a vague memory that thia episode was to be known as "A child of the stars". I remember watching this, aged 8, and again the following Saturday night, then every episode since, so I was "in" from the beginning !
Is the first 4 episodes complete? Thought some of these were lost
If this episode hadn't been so good, I probably wouldn't have watched as much Classic Who as I did. I watched most of the First Doctor's run, some of the Second, and was just barely starting the Third. I really need to get back into it!
Police box? I always thought that was a British phone booth!
They were exclusively for police.
You can also see how this Doctor is still very young, almost adolescent, even though that wasn't the intention at the time of course
Future Doctors: I must protect innocent lives at all costs.
1st Doctor: (Literally kidnaps school teachers, and attempts to kill a cavemen)
There are two rules still in place today:
-No aliens
-No bug eye monsters.
Both rules were broken in the second serial.
So I'm sure someone's already said this, but at 31:55, Ian is making fire the correct survival way using the two sticks and shoelace (which you can just about see if you look closely).
Basically instead of rubbing two sticks together, you make a bow out of one stick with the shoelace on either end, then twist the other stick in the tightened shoelace and hold it in place with a flat stone, if done correctly when you move the bow stick back and forth and it spins the stick twisted in the shoelace as it's being held in place, and the friction that it caused is basically bettter than any other hand-spun method of making fire.
If that was a joke, I'm sorry for explaining why it's not funny, but I just wanted to point that out and explain the basics of it because its an incredibly handy survival tool.
They did
Watching the starting episodes of this frightened me and I would watch them staring from behind a cushion. The daleks were terrifying.
its lovely getting the marathon a lovely start! its nce to have you touch on he fact that the caveman scenes are really gripping and still compaling! what i think really puts doctor who as a good show, is the fact that they give so much story and compeling ellements to the time period! this coud have easaly been the case of amaing main characters and skipping through scenes that they are not in, but the show immidiatly sets a higher bar then you thought through making the dialog as smart and complelling, filled with a lot more respect then expected to the cave man! its such a good way to sement doctor who! the quality of the main characters is almos t as good as the supporting cast
I remember watching this as it aired in 1963. Hard think that I am now so old.
Here's an incredible fact that we cannot begin to appreciate today: the UK had food rationing until 1954. 1954! Just 2-3 years after food rationing ended, the British (and French) empires came to an end when US President Eisenhower ordered British, French, and Israeli forces to cease their attacks in the Suez incident. I also contend to understand what the UK was about at that time, watch movies such as Alfie or Georgy Girl. We have a combination of a fallen empire where the people are contemplating if they will have part of the technologically advanced and prosperous future that may be just out of reach for them. I also contend that is why going to meeting cavemen is exactly the right place to go given the times. The entire UK people are being told they are now going to go out into the world no longer with the protection of empire, that empire will not be around to get them out of trouble with the natives. That is how First, the Doctor is -- a being no longer protected by empire, lost in the former colonies among the natives.
Thanks for giving the Fatman and Brian a shout out
How I wish in billions of ways, I had been born in the year 1963 or even born years earlier than 1963 so I could have been alive to see the early black and white Dr Who stories. I first started to watch Dr Who, in the early 1970s aged 3 when Jon Pertwee was the Dr.
For a scholarly essay about the political thrust of Classic Doctor Who, listen to the video (audio) essay:
ruclips.net/video/go7jMkKIajY/видео.html
Here, Jon Bigger sets out the case for an anarchist "exploration" of the show (not necessarily communist, as alluded in this video, but revolutionary nonetheless).
Later in the video, Bigger explores how these anarchistic aspects were dropped in the current 2015 reboot of the show, leading many lovers of Classic Who to form negative views about New Who over recent years.
18:50 never noticed how it prefigures Rutger Hauer. He extemporized and wouldn't have heard this. Great minds arrive at resonating ideas...
I saw both versions of the pilot when they were first transmitted way back in November 1963 I saw second version in a darkened room in front of a blazing coal fire a week after the 1st.
28:40 I would say timeless and relatable and something humankind can’t shake off, not necessarily dated.
Susan could have had a little more fortitude but Barbara indeed was out of her depth, though she is more level headed than Susan.
Also, in my mind though correct me if I’m wrong, I assume Susan is a Time Lady, shouldn’t she be far more mature than a human assuming she is a few hundred years old? I know the regeneration thing was a later idea as with the Time Lord concept but if she has been travelling with the Doctor, wouldn’t she be a bit more… used to danger? Not careless but wary?
31:58 the sticks arent touching because there is a rope around the vertical stick thats connected at both ends of the horizontal stick
I will die on this hill, An Unearthly Child, the episode, is one of the best in B&W era, it's truely an ICONIC episode, the rest of the serial? ehhhh, I thought for, MANY, years after I first saw it, that it was a 6 Part adventure, and, i feel like thats an achievement
Love it how you add "these cheeky s****"
Brilliant , I was 7 years Old I Remember The Opening Music and Visuals , and just being Draw In . William Hartnell , and Tom Baker where the Best `Doctors ` in my Humble Opinion .
Simply amazing ... in so many ways. CBC being involved, makes my B-day !!
Which was.a week ago. No fam, didn't celebrate .
When I saw this in the 80's on the local PBS station, they didn't show the cavemen episodes at all, but instead went directly into The Daleks. And I seem to remember a Doctor Who book at the time listed all of the serials in order, and had the first one as An Earthly Child/The Dead Planet, the latter, I believe, being the name of the first episode of The Daleks. So I'm wondering if at the time, the BBC felt that those episodes weren't good enough, and retconned them away.
At the first Dr. Who Convention in California, my SFX company sent our robot to greet Tom Baker at the airport. Tom walked up to it, shook its claw and said "I believe I have met you before"....I also met Johnathan there and briefly broached the idea of an American Dr, with not much positive response.....