How Copyright Works: Fair Use, Parody, and Copyright Infringement | Berklee Online
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 8 авг 2018
- Download Your Free Music Business Handbook Now: berkonl.in/3XRrl9n
Earn Your Music Business Degree Online with Berklee: berkonl.in/2XjPKt0
In this video, Berklee Online course author Dr. E. Michael Harrington describes how to distinguish between fair use and copyright infringement through examples such as “Something in the Way She Moves,” by James Taylor, which George Harrison borrowed for a popular Beatles song. Dr. Harrington also explores cases involving the Dixie Chicks with their song, “Sin Wagon.” Another song called “I’ll Fly Away,” written by Albert Bromley, is the complete opposite of “Sin Wagon”; they have completely different ideas behind them. The Dixie Chicks wanted to use “I’ll Fly Away” to create a parody. They were sued for those three words, “I’ll fly away,” even though parody is fair use, which is legal. Dr. Harrington cites a peculiar example of Miles Davis and Jimi Hendrix as well. He explains how even though a title is not copyrightable, if the title is also a lyric, then it is copyrightable. Parody, according to the Supreme Court, means you have to take from the heart of the song because the listener has to be reminded of what the song is about. If you state a melody the same way another artist did (such as the Beatles), the same number of times, this is direct copying. It is debatable whether or not this is fair use.
About E. Michael Harrington:
Dr. E. Michael Harrington is a professor in music copyright and intellectual property matters. He has lectured at many law schools, organizations, and music conferences throughout North America, including Harvard Law, George Washington University Law, Hollywood Bar Association, Texas Bar, Minnesota Bar, Houston Law Center, Brooklyn Law, BC Law, Loyola Law, NYU, McGill, Eastman, Emory, the Experience Music Project, Future of Music Coalition, Pop Montreal, and others. He has worked as a consultant and expert witness in hundreds of music copyright matters including efforts to return "We Shall Overcome" and "This Land Is Your Land" to the public domain, and has worked with director Steven Spielberg, producer Mark Burnett, the Dixie Chicks, Steve Perry, Busta Rhymes, Samsung, Keith Urban, HBO, T-Pain, T. I., Snoop Dogg, Collin Raye, Tupac Shakur, Lady Gaga, George Clinton, Mariah Carey, and others. He sits on the editorial board of the Journal of Popular Culture, advisory board of the Future of Music Coalition and the Creators Freedom Project, and is a member of Leadership Music. Michael has been interviewed by the New York Times, CNN, Bloomberg Law, Wall Street Journal, Time, Huffington Post, Billboard, USA Today, Rolling Stone, Money Magazine, Investor's Business Daily, People Magazine, Life Magazine, and Washington Post, in addition to BRAVO, PBS, ABC News, NBC's "Today Show," the Biography Channel, NPR, CBC and others. He teaches Music Business Capstone and Music Licensing courses at Berklee Online, and is the course author and instructor for Music Business Law, part of the curriculum for Berklee Online’s Master of Art in Music Business degree.
About Berklee Online:
Berklee Online is the continuing education division of Berklee College of Music, delivering online access to Berklee's acclaimed curriculum from anywhere in the world, offering online courses, certificate programs, and degree programs. Contact an Academic Advisor today:
1-866-BERKLEE (US)
1-617-747-2146 (international callers)
advisors@online.berklee.edu
/ berkleeonline
/ berkleeonline
/ berkleeonline
Copyright Law | E. Michael Harrington | Fair Use | Copyright Infringement | James Taylor | The Beatles | Dixie Chicks | Parody | Miles Davis | Jimi Hendrix | Albert Bromley | Music Business | Berklee Online | Berklee College of Music | Music Business Law 
Видеоклипы
It is my frustration to upload cover songs in you tube because most of the time I got the cpr claim...Thanks a lot sir for sharing your thoughts on the issue of how copyright works. I've learned a lot.
Both of these videos are great! I learn so much from watching, even listening, I always look foward to your copywrite talks🔥💯💯✌💪💪👍
He was my professor at WPU when I went. Dr. E Michael Harrington!!
Dr E. Man I love this guy. I had the honor to work with this man. One of the best. Just hope he’s still riding his bicycle. Cheers mate.
Q: What if you A: change *some* words (eg "she hates you"), B: change *some *notes (eg from minor to major), and C: change the style (eg pop to metal) .. BUT the orignal song still clearly recognisable?
I can garge you with theft on my shina twain maybe not infrigment but theft it is a against the law as copyright will check out this youtube australia
If the song is still "clearly recognizable" then it is "substantially" or "strikingly" similar to the one that inspired it. This makes it probable that a court will find copyright infringement has occurred (unless your song is a parody of the other, in which case a greater level of copying is usually permitted). The general rule of thumb is that a court is likely to rule that infringement occurred if the two songs are played before a judge or jury and they find it more probable than not that the similarities couldn't be coincidental, so copying must have taken place. So any song that is "clearly recognizable" as being derived from another involves a ton of legal risk because it's very hard to explain that away as independent creation and pure coincidence.
As someone who was raised in the church this tells me a lot about the type of people who own the rights to I’ll fly away vs the rights of the Beatles song.
That accent takes me right back to my Boston days
great info. did not know this legality.
The problem with parody is there is a fine line between comedy and just plain out cruelty. That's why the Greeks called it Tragedy.
instaBlaster.
Can you say "hello Clarice"
Eyesic Gutierrez 🙌😆🤣
Underrated Comment
Him plus John Lithgow
Not today. 🙄
Brilliance.
Thanks for this‼️
It's useful for us thank you sir
So does this mean that if you don't commercialize the work and purely release it as a free speech argument to comment on the original work, then there is no copyright infringement?
Also I'm particularly interested in how parody works in visual media, i.e. a comic book. Would anyone have any recommendations, as most of the parody and other copyright material that I've found typically concentrates on the music industry, which, while lovely, isn't really the field within which I'm interested in practicing.
Parody has been protected via the SCOTUS in multiple cases. South Park makes a living off parade.
Does anyone know how sampling of an interview works. For example sampling lets say 40 seconds of an interview. Would it be illegal to use it without permission?
That depends upon the specific circumstances involved. As stated in the video, what you need to do is analyze your proposed use of this sample in light of the four factors of fair use, namely (1) "the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes;
(2) the nature of the copyrighted work; (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work." (Also, if your intended use is that of parody, then greater leeway is given under the law compared to non-parody uses).
To give a few examples, showing a 40 second clip of an interview in a classroom lecture because it is of great historical or cultural significance and therefore has important educational value is almost certainly fair use. It's also very likely to be fair use if you're making a documentary video and including that clip of an interview is necessary to illustrate an important point you're trying to convey to your audience. But it would NOT be fair use if you were to simply post that 40 second clip on RUclips without any context or commentary because now you're not adding any value to it, but are just ripping off copyrighted footage owned by someone else. Unfortunately some situations involving fair use and parody are not so clear cut, so if you (or anyone reading this) needs proper legal advice to know whether their proposed use is legal or not, I would recommend consulting an attorney who specializes in intellectual property law.
I’m writing a novel and on numerous occasions, I quote lines from popular songs’ lyrics (most often a line or two at most). In every case I give proper credit to the author(s). My son says I need to get permission in every case. Is that true?
Need to clarify points and put on the screen. If someone uses a 4 chord melody they find online, puts their own lyrics and vocals to it,is this a copyright? Does changing the key or adding another instrument, then make it okay to sell it commerically? I saw another video and the guy implied just changing the speed and key of the song , takes away copyright infringement, is this right?
Hi in June 2020! So many people are doing parodies. They are using karaoke tracks (isn't that copyright infringement?), or altered tracks (using Audibly lowering the voice but you can still slightly hear it). I guess they're giving up their monetizing or something, but some are big channels with nothing BUT parodies. I'm terrified to get shut down if i dare to do one! Is there a better way to do it?
Hello - my husband and his had recorded a cover a popular song. It sounds like the original but with a darker twist. Can they copyright their work? If so, how?? We got to limitation requirements page and wanted to get advice before continuing. Thanks!!
This is great
Thank you very much for this informative video 🙏☺️⭐️
Incredible lecture, masterful Boston accent
Copyright is freaking terrible. On the one hand, you want to protect your work, but on the other hand, people sometimes use it in a selfish and greedy manner. Most of these people are rich Hollywood idiots who have already made millions, but they want more, more, more!
Can you upload a parody song without copyright claim? I haven't tried it yet but interested to know how it works
What a fascinating video! Thanks for sharing it.
Glad you enjoyed it!
Can a person use a imitation or similar voice to yodas voice to sell a product? voice only!????Curious
I understand its 3 words but so are I will survive and Don't stop believing 🤷♀️
Can I read a book and make notes from it?
We used to have that right.
Soooo to clarify, (I'm a youtuber) if I just change the words to make it funny and entertaining, I guess that's not "comment, criticize or ridicule" and it would get a strike? Isn't it technically still copyright infringement because i would be using someone's music to sing along to? (p.s. I contacted a particular artist's label asking if i could change the words, they asked to see the words, and said no. If I haven't have asked, i wonder if they would have let it go (if they ever found it). Comments?) Much thanks!
dixie chicks use the words ill fly away and they get taken to court then settles out of court. like wtf. even if it wasn't parody, I don't see how any form of infringement would have been done. many others have used those words too.
Billy Bragg just did this to Oliver Anthony
This was much more helpful than so may other videos!!! Thank you!!!
Will I get sued if I make a paradoy of a song without permission?
People can file a lawsuit for any reason, even if they have a flimsy case that will get dismissed the first time it comes before a judge! So I can't say with 100% certainly you won't ever get sued for making a parody. But I can tell you that the law (at least in the context of the U.S.) provides strong free speech and fair use protections for actual parodies that both comment upon and "transformatively" make use of the original source material. Parodies have been upheld as legal in a number of precedent setting court cases.
However, just because you call something a "parody" doesn't necessarily mean a judge or jury will agree! To quote Wikipedia's article about Parody, "In 2007, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals denied a fair use defense in the _Dr. Seuss Enterprises v. Penguin Books_ case. Citing the _Campbell v. Acuff-Rose_ decision, they found that a satire of the O.J. Simpson murder trial and parody of The Cat in the Hat had infringed upon the children's book because it did not provide a commentary function upon that work." In other words, the court didn't agree with the defendant that the allegedly infringing work met the criteria to be considered a "parody" because it didn't actually comment upon the source material itself.
Nobody cares until a song makes a ton of money and is popular.
NiN "Starfuckers" parodies Carly Simon. I wonder if there were some stern phone calls from a Simon label retained attorney.
Does parody qualify in art form?
now this is epic
So did the beatles win?
He said at the end that there was no litigation meaning Beatles did not even try to sue him or do anything. Joe Diffie was not even on their radar probably.
amazing... this is just ridiculous ... suing over this is paper thin.. ridiculous
Nice vid
The way this guy morphs and edits other photos (ruclips.net/video/S6kB9ZHkWf4/видео.html) would this be considered a copyright infringement?
If so, how much more removed from the original would he have to make the pieces to avoid infringement?
You need to be extra careful when you write a movie, or an episode of a TV show that parodies another well-known movie. Have you heard of Lord of the Beans? Phil Vischer wrote a kid-friendly parody of the Lord of the Rings, book and film trilogy, to teach kids to use their gifts wisely. New Line Cinema sent Phil Vischer a cease-and-desist letter for "illegally" parodying Lord of the Rings. Parodies are not inherently illegal, but my mom and I quickly realized what made Lord of the Beans borderline illegal. Lord of the Beans wasn't a parody like Phil intended it to be because it doesn't do anything to comment, criticize or ridicule Lord of the Rings. I haven't yet seen any Lord of the Rings movies myself, but I can bet that VeggieTales copied their story too straight without actually making fun of it. April 13, 2021, 5:01pm
Wouldn’t an Homage to another creative work be considered CRITICISM? 🎭🎨🎬
Now you have done the wrong thing by me I can go for copyright infrigment in shina twin because you taken that with my consent
By singing these songs didn't you infringe the copyrights? Asking for a friend.
Lol
✍✍✍👨🎤👨🎤
🃏🃏🃏🃏🃏
wicked pissah!