We are trying our best to connect with the students - this is one of our basic principles that we want to be available and relatable on a personal basis! How can we improve in your opinion? I don´t understand what you mean with "virgo"...
Physiotutors in a way to communicate a student like me a teacher just put a smile on his face n a virgo so it means the thing I mentioned is just a little picky no one even noticed that things
@@lemonke5978 Cluster of Laslett et al. removed Gaenslen's from van der Wurff et al., sensitivity went from 0.91 to 0.88; specificity stayed the same at 0.78; +LR went from 4.16 to 4.00; -LR went from 0.16 to 0.12. Not a huge amount of clinical value for Gaenslen's. I prefer Laslett in my physiotherapy practice.
No no no no. When I do that Faber test is clicks. I thought it was my hip joint this whole time. It could be my SI. Is there a video on how to differentiate hip joint vs SI?
this was very well explained.
+M Akhtar thanks a lot! Make sure to check the cluster of laslett as well
You 2 rock!!
Thanks André! Spread the word!;)
andreas is a good tutor😊 and kai u r are good model
"And I thought I had the looks and the skills 😞😞😞" - Kai
Physiotutors put your more efforts to connect with the students😂 but you are doing well n dont. be said I m virgo so I m just very picky
We are trying our best to connect with the students - this is one of our basic principles that we want to be available and relatable on a personal basis! How can we improve in your opinion?
I don´t understand what you mean with "virgo"...
Physiotutors in a way to communicate a student like me a teacher just put a smile on his face
n a virgo so it means the thing I mentioned is just a little picky no one even noticed that things
Kai is hot 😀
This is very similar to cluster of laslet!
Indeed
@@Physiotutors Is there actualy any difference between the two testclusters, also in relation to clinical value? Is there one you'd rather use?
@@lemonke5978 THE QUESTION THAT NEEDS AN ANSWER hahahahha
@@lemonke5978 Cluster of Laslett et al. removed Gaenslen's from van der Wurff et al., sensitivity went from 0.91 to 0.88; specificity stayed the same at 0.78; +LR went from 4.16 to 4.00; -LR went from 0.16 to 0.12. Not a huge amount of clinical value for Gaenslen's. I prefer Laslett in my physiotherapy practice.
No no no no. When I do that Faber test is clicks. I thought it was my hip joint this whole time. It could be my SI. Is there a video on how to differentiate hip joint vs SI?
We don't have a video on this yet. But we cover it in our online course. Bit.ly/PTMSK
Cute guy is lying like a baby