Chartek 2218 vs. Cementitious Passive Fire Protection

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 15 янв 2025

Комментарии • 5

  • @bond00000071
    @bond00000071 2 года назад

    How much time does it take to apply jetfire requirement

  • @bond00000071
    @bond00000071 2 года назад

    And also what is the thickness of one coat

  • @tatlibebekler3405
    @tatlibebekler3405 2 года назад

    Hi. I am doing this job in Azerbaijan. how can i join you i would like to work with you

  • @IPProtectiveCoatings
    @IPProtectiveCoatings  7 лет назад

    Introducing the fastest and most efficient epoxy passive fire protection for onshore projects - Chartek 2218 offers simplified reinforcement installation and unique rapid cure enabling fast application, improved production rates and reduced overall costs. AkzoNobel Protective Coatings demonstrate the benefits of using Chartek 2218 vs. cementitious fire proofing. www.chartek.com info.protectivecoatingsme@akzonobel.com

    • @turguttturgutt6139
      @turguttturgutt6139 9 месяцев назад

      You have to compare it on site under construction when scaffolding erected for fireproofing, I agree if work shop application Chartek is easy but at site and for cost wise Cementitious is far cheaper than chartek.