3:01 "The Moors who ruled Iberia for 800 years" is a hyperbolic statement. The battle of Las Navas de Tolosa in 1212 sealed the Christian reconquista of the Iberian peninsula. Only the kingdom a Granada survived until 1492 as a vassal state of the kingdom of Castilla.
Al Andalous a duré 711 à 1236 , puis il ne reste que Grenade j'usqu'a 1492 Donc les Musulmans n'ont pas gouverné L'Hispania 800 annes comme vous dites mais 525 annes , Grenade ne représente pas la péninsule IBÉRIQUE 😊
@@jojolafrite9265ni tan siquiera eso, desde el primer siglo empezaron a perder territorio desde Asturias en el 722 y después siglo a siglo, rechazados tras las fronteras del Río Duero, y así poco a poco. No fueron unas fechas fijas. La reconquista por los cristianos comenzó en Asturias creándose el primer reino cristiano asturleonés. En el siglo 8.
@@egutiguti3337 Tambien se dice que fué en 718 la derrota de los moros frente a Pelayo nuestro Heroe El camino fué muy largo , nuestros Ancestros lo consigieron en 1492 ....y las Americas por si fuera Poco💪🇪🇦✝️
@@NazarioOrbe En 1235 la péninsule IBÉRIQUE n'étais plus musulmane. Il y avait les Royaumes chrétiens comme le Portugal , Castille , Aragon . Les taifas a cette époque ils avaient rejoint les CHRÉTIENS. Et Grenade si elle a tenue deux siècles de plus , cet parceque elle payé des très forts impôts au Espagnols qui en 1492 prendra fin
@@jojolafrite9265 that isn't accurate, by the 9th century a chunk of Spain was already Christian (the north) and by 1031 a chunk of the country was christian already.
@@YmustTh3w0rldG0r0und It’s because our people are connected. There was a genetic study that revealed that Irish peoples DNA is closest to the northern Spanish. The Celts of Iberia fled to Ireland after Rome invaded the peninsula
That is interesting because the majority of the French who fled the Haitian Revolution (1790-1804) went to Cuba, the Orienté region, and Louisiana. You must be descended from French colonists.
@TheBigdaddy64 Do you have grandparents or great-grandparents who were big landowners, Sugar can land owners? Because the french got themselves busy in Cuba, developing the land by themselves. Many got succesful and assimilated in the local Cuba créole bourgeoisie.
Millones de españoles emigraron a Cuba y Argentina en el siglo XIX, siendo cubano me extraña que no lo sepa, es más, a día de hoy todavía hay familias cubanas con familiares en España. El mismo Fidel Castro era medio español y tenía y sigue teniendo familia en Galicia. Lo que me extraña es que Vd. desconozca esto que es historia de antes de ayer.
it's difficult to tell, we need more deep ancestry and regional analysis. the J2 is very present in Coastal Portugal and close (like in Coimbra) and former Phoenician colonies in Spain. "Y-chromosome diversity in central Portugal reveals genetic signatures regarding Phoenician colonization" - Martiniano & alt.
The two main conquerors of Iberia have been the Roman and Muslim Empires. The Romans spoke Latin and Muslims spoke Arabic. Both the Romans and Arabs brought in settlers to assimilate the Iberians. However, in the genetic profile of the of today's Iberians, on the average, Italian and Arab/Berber DNA is on the average less than 5%, and Jewish is even less. Other trace DNA is British, Scandinavian, French/German which sometimes is higher. Why? Romans and Muslim came to assimilate as they did in France with the Gaul/Frankish population. This explains how Portugal with a small population of 17,000,000 can produce a country like Brazil with over 200,000,000 people speaking Portuguese. Or Spain with 40,000,000 produce 600,000,000 Spanish speakers in Hispanic America.
@@Fati.Ferreiro -Ah que bueno! ¡Mucho gusto en conocerte! Entonces eres de España y de Galicia. Y sabes, yo nunca pensé que los gallegos y portugueses tuvieran los mismos apellidos, me equivoqué, mil disculpas....De hecho, yo también tengo um poco de sangre portuguesa ,ya que mi abuela materna tenía el apellido Maciel. Saludos 😉✌️
No. Los Hispanos hemos superado al Nazismo con nuestra genética. No volvera a pasar.Y si nos pinchan fundaremos una nueva Unión Transoceánica Hispana con sedes en Lima, Veracruz y Madrid uniendo politicamente a 300 millones de hispanohablantes con un pasado común.
Do you know the wars of El Cid and Luís de Camões?, El Cid is Giorgi Saakadze from Spain and Luís de Camões he is the same Rustaveli, this country is similar to us, we are one people
The moors ruled Iberia for 800 years?!? LOL... They were isolated in Granada, a small region of Andalucía, 800 years. What's next, "ENGLAND HAS RULED SPAIN DURING 200 YEARS BECAUSE THEY HAVE GIBRALTAR"???
The people in modern day New Mexico are descendants a lot of them came from Galicia and ASTURA. they actually have more Spanish DNA than most Spanish do. Because they closed the gap. There are some that have some Jewish dna and some that might have some Arab dna and there is some that's got far E DNA. But most of them are between 60 to 75% Spanish this may be some add mixture of Arab Jewish Native American is the second one.
@@FREEd5407 some Jordanians have an Arab component but they aren't original from Arabia they are did ethnicity similar but different with similar cultures
@YadinZedek777, Not sure about the Spanish but the Portuguese share more with the Egyptian Copts and Egyptians in general according to the 23 & Me estimates I've seen. But when it's present it's less than 1%. I do come across a few Y-DNA samples with origins in the Arabian peninsula but much less than North African. North West African is much more common than anything from the Middle East but still a small percentage.
Great video, Iberian history and civilizations are very underrated, and appreciated. Spaniards and Portuguese were some of the first to extensively explore the world. By the way, are you interested in the evolution and spread of light skin alleles, as I'm curious as to how dark the Western Hunter Gatherers actually were?
@@aag3752Basically people were darker before but you’re right. That’s why dravidians and turkics proto-mongols are your farthest cousins. As they’re indo-europeans too. Neolithic Farmers and Mesolithic Shepherds are brought from AfroAsiatics people group ( indigenous northern africans and mideasterns, first occupier of Southern Europe, Anatolia, Persians historical lands, and Horn of Africa )
Iberia is the first civilization. Europe was already inhabited by Georgians, Pelasgians, Etruscans, Picts, Basques, Celt-Iberians are Iberian people, today's Europe arose as a result of Indo-Europeans and Iberian people, Iberians lived there before Indo-European people
You and I should clarify one issue. Are you sicilian? In Georgian it means laught, and I didn't know if it was related to Iberia, but I knew that its name is a Georgian word.
i understand that,the first inhabitants of spain,as well as ötzi,and the first ones crossing anatolia 8000 years ago to europe,were the sardinian dna closely related people from ancient anatolia,which must have also contributed to the ancient dna of greece as well as all the mediterranean...about the basques and their language...some researchers say,their difference lies in scythian ancestry,which is not indo european...
basques are the closest modern people to the sardinians because of ANF dna plus WHG dna,. the Scythians were Indo-Iranic and most likely where red hair originated from. They contributed to more Northern and Eastern euro dna.
I am going to give a very simple explanation: in Spain there are no remains of Roman genetics, even less than in England (the Romans spent almost a thousand years in Spain); nor Visigothic, although they ruled for centuries and they say they remained in the nobility (for more than a thousand years); but the best thing, the greatest proportion of Celtic genetics is in the east and southeast (where the Islamist-Aryan Visigoths of Tingitana stayed the longest) and the greatest proportion of blood (let's say North African), in the north, more specifically in the northwest , which is where the alleged Islamists did not remain (we will call them non-Muslim Arian Christians, which explains everything better). As you can see, genetics denies the historical statement and with even greater reason they deny that there was never any reconquest, nor was there anything to conquer, if they were always the same, at least during the last 5000 years. A comment, the Anglo-Saxon world in the interest of its church and its nationalism has supported the extermination of the British population by the Anglo-Saxons (for centuries); but genetics says that it is false, because the British are still there and they are also the vast majority. It seems that Europe has remained practically pre-Roman and Spain is no exception. Furthermore, it seems important to me, Iberian genetics does not end in the Pyrenees, but remains a majority throughout the south of France, alien to all the nationalist stories told. History and genetics don't mix well, it seems. In other words, history is the greatest lie ever told, like the conquest of America, which was conquered by the Indians, in reality, an army of 300,000 warriors behind the back of Cortes, the liberator. And through this story the English-speaking world expels Spain from the world (because it is genocidal, they deny the diseases) and from Europe (as non-whites, genetics had not yet been invented) as P. Powell the Hispanist stated, in his book “Tree of Hate”, which should be required reading around the world. The English have tried it and best of all, for convenience, they have all accepted it. The conclusion is that North African genetics were maintained in the north, which has nothing to do with the genetics of North Africa today (they arrived thousands of years before, just like in France or Germany, as farmers) and on the that those Muslims (Arian Christians) had no influence, because they did not occupy the territory except occasionally. In the south and east of the peninsula (Mediterranean area) is the most genetically Celtic area and if the Muslims (Arian Christians) remained there, there they left their genetics, which is r1b1, that is, Celtic, that is, they are the same Celts that were there before. of the religious civil war that lasted 8 centuries. History developed based on nationalism everywhere, Rome that survived as the Vatican power considered that this was the history that suited itself for Spain, which did not escape its dominance in the Middle Ages, except for the Western Schism. , and which the rest of Europe decided to get rid of by creating the Protestant world, for a reason.
@@alvaroobregon4596 ¡No te creo! Ya que tienes.el retraro de un presidente mexicano en tu perfil, y dejame decirte que los cubanos no se interesan mucho en la historia mexicana, mas que para pasar por el territorio, ya sea por tierra ó mar cuando se escapan en balsas.. P..D Oye chico, no te pongas a inventar marañas.😁✌️
@@AntonioGonzalezJr-un1gb me mommy my love to the death by the way he was Spanish gave his life for your people and that's the thanks he gits f you he gave you the pride you carry fool
My ancestry is 49.2% European, with {46.8% Southern European)-(39.2% Spanish & Portuguese)-(3.2% Italian)-(4.4% Broadly Southern European)-(1.5% Ashkenazi)-(0.9% Broadley European}, wish I knew what exactly this meant, however my other half is (42.1 Indigenous American).
I am from Spain. I have 14,7% of Sardinian DNA (now I get is Western hunter gatherers), which is close to the 13% average. Then I have 74% Iberian, 5,5% Ashkenazi, 2,2% Finnish, 2% Scandinavian and 1,6% Baltic.
In general the video is good, however, most studies show Galicia to have more North African ancestry than Extremadura, and in any case, both, Galicia and Extremadura show more North African lineage than Castile and Leon.
We have very little records about pre Roman Iberia. We at best can say Ancient Iberians had Greek, Phoenician and Celtic heritage. Overall I believe Iberia to have predominantly Latin ancestry. Even today the Spanish look like ancient Romans and they look similar to Italians almost indistinguishable. Iberia was by far the most Romanized province thats why its past is a mystery the natives accepted Roman culture so easily very few traces of pre Roman Iberian culture remains.
Ancient iron age iberians and the original/iron age monarchy/republican era romans / italics looked similar because they were both predominately ANF (anatolian Neolithic farmer)
this is incorrect. Spain is mostly celtic and western european. Italy is more Mediterranean with some dna from the levant. Spain is mostly R1b and Italy is usually J
Iberia is Georgia, country. Europe was already inhabited by Pelasgians, Etruscans, Picts, Basques, Celt-Iberians are Iberian people, today's Europe arose as a result of Indo-Europeans and Iberian people, Iberians lived there before Indo-European people.
@@michaelcandido2824 "mostly celtic " the celts arrived too late. we can assume they mixed cultural and genetically with Native Iberians of varied cultures. (if Iron Age Central and North Europe influx is interpreted correctly as celtic). "R1b and Italy is usually J" tells nothing. Armenia is R1b.
Hello! Thanks for all your videos! I love all this and as a Spanish person I will tell you my DNA results: according to Genomelink I have 40% First Farmers, 34% Steppe Pastor, 12% Hunter Gatherers and the rest from South Asia basically 9%, West Africa 3 %, Native American 1% and East Asian 1%. I don't know how reliable these tests are, because I get very different ancestry results in My Heritage, Genomelink, MyTrueAncestry... but it's all curious.
Genomelink and all those sites are garbage and misleading. Illustrativedna is more accurate and its one of the only places you should upload your raw data to, along with gedmatch if you want and maybe codegen (for free detailed uncensored health report)
Spanish... or Hispanic? The percentage of Native American, West African and Asian (as a whole) is very strange in Spain... but very normal in Latin Americans.
@@arkaitzetxeandia7542Hello Akaitz! I am Spanish, my entire family is from the Iberian Peninsula until a long time ago. This report refers to something very ancient, it would be from thousands of years ago. The thing about Asia on other pages does appear to me as Western Asia as more recent and the same to my mother. In My Heritage:86.9 Iberian (two groups);10 Italian not specified (Italy:Northern Italy,Switzerland,Austria,Monaco,a part of Northwest Albania);3.1 Western Asia not specified (Iran, Lebanon,Georgia, Armenia, Azerbaijan...).My Heritage (my mother) identical general percentage to mine. As a difference, she has 4 different Iberian genetic groups, 2 from France and 2 from Basque. We were surprised that it puts DNA in all of France already in the 20th century (it brings a timeline). It puts me, but further back. In Genomelink I get without specifying: 46% Northwest Europe (British, French, German, Irish or Scandinavian)39% Other European (Italy, Spain, Hungary, Albania, etc.)10% Eastern Europe (Estonian, Finnish, Russian, Polish or Ukrainian), 1% Asian, 1% African, 4% Arctic or Middle East. My mother gets more in Eastern Europe. In Tell me Gen it gives me 99.4% European, of which Iberian was 98.8%. I laughed a lot when I saw it. The rest put European Jew 0.6% and Egyptian 0.5%. I was amazed by this last one, but the percentages are so low that, well, I don't know.In My True Ancestry they seem to be more refined. In ancient towns, I especially have from the current area of the Balkans, Italy, France, Germany and the Iberian Peninsula. I obtained: Illyrios (39.7%). I believe this people is the basis of Spanish genetics, my mother and my husband (Galician) also have them in large quantities. I understand that they were in what is now Albania, Serbia... Etruscans, I believe, were an indigenous Italian people ( 20%), Romans of Hispania 8.3%, Aquitanians (French Basque Country area) 5.68, Rhaeti 5.32%, Gauls (French Celts 3.91%), Al Andalus does not specify 3.76%; Visigoths 3 .63%, Iberians 3.08%, Pannonian Illyrians 2.9; Daunii 0.86;Samnites 0.73; Scordisci 0.59; Corinthian Greeks 0.39; Macedonians 0.32; Vascons 0.2; Franks 0.17; Phoenicians 0.1 and Dacians 0.13. My mother is similar, except that she has increased the percentage of Visigoths to 8.3, Aquitanians 7.19 Gauls 5.47, also more Rhaeti, Franks and Iberians than me. Something appears to my mother that can explain Asia. Western Scythians and the Parthian Empire appear, so something very distant comes from there, but I suppose the most recent thing is that we share heritage with Eastern Europe and I think that is normal for a Spaniard, Spain was populated like that, although I have also I thought about whether there could be any gypsy ancestors that we had some genetic fingerprint on, but I have no idea. According to Genomelink, both my mother and I would also have Viking ancestors, according to what Iron Age England tells me, but I don't know how reliable this is. It gives me a Viking index of 65% and that I have Scandinavian Vikings especially and British ones. I see My True Ancestry as more real, but I suppose that everything is complementary and that we are a cocktail of ethnicities that makes us a good genetic historical puzzle.
@@arkaitzetxeandia7542 Hello Arkaitz! I'm Spanish, my entire family is from the Iberian Peninsula until a long time ago. This report refers to something very ancient, it would be from thousands of years ago. The thing about Asia on other pages does appear to me as Western Asia as more recent and the same to my mother. In My Heritage:86.9 Iberian (two groups);10 Italian not specified (Italy:Northern Italy,Switzerland,Austria,Monaco,a part of Northwest Albania);3.1 Western Asia not specified (Iran, Lebanon,Georgia, Armenia, Azerbaijan...).My Heritage (my mother) identical general percentage to mine. As a difference, she has 4 different Iberian genetic groups, 2 from France and 2 from Basque. We were surprised that it puts DNA in all of France already in the 20th century (it brings a timeline). It puts me, but further back. In Genomelink I get without specifying: 46% Northwest Europe (British, French, German, Irish or Scandinavian)39% Other European (Italy, Spain, Hungary, Albania, etc.)10% Eastern Europe (Estonian, Finnish, Russian, Polish or Ukrainian), 1% Asian, 1% African, 4% Arctic or Middle East. My mother gets more in Eastern Europe. In Tell me Gen it gives me 99.4% European, of which Iberian was 98.8%. I laughed a lot when I saw it. The rest put European Jew 0.6% and Egyptian 0.5%. I was amazed by this last one, but the percentages are so low that, well, I don't know.In My True Ancestry they seem to be more refined. In ancient towns, I especially have from the current area of the Balkans, Italy, France, Germany and the Iberian Peninsula. I obtained: Illyrios (39.7%). I believe this people is the basis of Spanish genetics, my mother and my husband (Galician) also have them in large quantities. I understand that they were in what is now Albania, Serbia... Etruscans, I believe, were an indigenous Italian people ( 20%), Romans of Hispania 8.3%, Aquitanians (French Basque Country area) 5.68, Rhaeti 5.32%, Gauls (French Celts 3.91%), Al Andalus does not specify 3.76%; Visigoths 3 .63%, Iberians 3.08%, Pannonian Illyrians 2.9; Daunii 0.86;Samnites 0.73; Scordisci 0.59; Corinthian Greeks 0.39; Macedonians 0.32; Vascons 0.2; Franks 0.17; Phoenicians 0.1 and Dacians 0.13. My mother is similar, except that she has increased the percentage of Visigoths to 8.3, Aquitanians 7.19 Gauls 5.47, also more Rhaeti, Franks and Iberians than me. Something appears to my mother that can explain Asia. Western Scythians and the Parthian Empire appear, so something very distant comes from there, but I suppose the most recent thing is that we share heritage with Eastern Europe and I think that is normal for a Spaniard, Spain was populated like that. According to Genomelink, both my mother and I would also have Viking ancestors, according to what Iron Age England tells me, but I don't know how reliable this is. It gives me a Viking index of 65% and that I have Scandinavian Vikings especially and British ones. I suppose that everything is complementary and that we are a cocktail of ethnicities that makes us a good genetic historical puzzle.
@@4bidden1 It was the most logical choice after Brazil. I’ve got a visa now so I can’t leave until I get my residency card, so I’m locked in for the next couple months.
@@AncestralBrew nice. Consider doing a video on Neanderthal genetics..if they were still alive today, would people still consider them a separate species?
The Vandals were a Germanic group from Northern Europe that in the time of Rome's fall, migrated to Iberian Peninsula and later to North Africa. Actually the name Al-Andalus means "Land of the Vandals".
If you believe in god , can you tell us where did prophet adam came from ... i think he came from middle-east to be more specific al sham (Levant) like Palestine or syria because the oldest cities are there ... what do you think
I left your channel because you had announced that you would no longer make "videos about genetics "however you seem to not have been serious that statement .
It seems that he has forgotten the 300 years of Scandinavian government known as Visigoths, but of course since the Scandinavians are actually genetically Slavs, I accept it as valid.
@@juanv5375 Okay, you caught me, maybe that's why 40% of Spanish names are of Germanic origin, possibly they were more Germanic than Scandinavian if in the 5th century there were half a million out of 6 million Spaniards, well we have something from both peoples.
Amazing video. I like that it was more detailed. I see that you still take it to heart when some of the people who watch your videos end up having nationalist perspectives. I hope that you don't take this personally but that is a bit narcissistic. I'll assure you that a 5 or 10 molinute video made by you didnt contribute a lot to that. I think that you're overthinking that.
@@arkaitzetxeandia7542 thats not true. There have been over 600 years of shared history. Plus there are tons of groups of Mestizo people that in Spain mean mixed Spaniard and Roma. It may not be talked about in the history books because of racism but Roma influence is strong and current. Flamenco is a Roma art form.
@@clinkedylinkedy1, Gypsies have been around for just over 500 years ALL OVER EUROPE, in fact Spain is one of the last countries on the continent to which they arrived. No "Strong influence". Where I live, in the Basque Country, there are hardly any gypsies, I have never met any in my personal circle... and I am already 56 years old.
@@salvadormartin4203 DNA results largely depend on the reference populations that the DNA testing company uses. If they have a smaller reference population it won't be as accurate at identifying a region. The test might confuse some parts of your DNA because they look similar. Also when you see regions in your results, it can include admixtures. So another company might have Sephardic but the one you used didn't say it because that makeup was not uncommon for their gene pool of another region if that makes sense. Or maybe you do have an ancestor with it, you'll just have to do more research.
Learning a lot from your videos in how to understand better my ancient DNA. On my dad's side there is Iberian. I was looking for more Moorish ancestry around Andalusia, like the energy of Southern Spain, but it turns out in all of Spain the DNA from dad's side is closer to Celtic Iberian and Basque. Interesting.
@@TheAll5555 The only way they would have mixed their DNA would have been through r🦍, but the Iberians did not want to mix with enemy invaders that stole their land
Fantastic video thank you. Also could I talk you into doing a video. About Hannibal Barca and the origins of the carthaginians. Please it'll be much appreciated thank you. Also you have a new subscriber👍💯
Oooops 77% from different locations in southern Europe mostly Spain and 23% from different locations in Mexico. Details too many to list. @@arkaitzetxeandia7542
It would be very interesting to compare Basque and Georgian DNA, because the Basque language and Georgian language have many ancient words in common. There has to be some connection
A lot of people believe that, but it isn't proven. There are theories saying that the Vascons and Aquitanians (ancestors of the Basques, Gascons and Aragonese people of the Pyrenees) are connected to the Georgians, and/or possibly the Chechens, the Ingush or the Circassians. I remember reading a compared vocabulary list of Chechen and Basque a while ago, but I lost it sadly. I think that there might be some truth to it. Southern Europeans are descended mainly from the Early Neolithic Farmers from Anatolia (only the Basque still speak their language though). I know that some linguistic and genetic studies linked the Anatolian people and also the Minoan people with the Caucasus Hunter-Gatherers. Likewise... many people mocked the Romans for the theories regarding descending from Trojans and same for the Etruscan being descended from people from Anatolia, but modern genetic data tend to confirm fringe theories like this more and more. So... nothing is impossible.
Could it be that the Western Hunter & Gatherers, who mainly derived their ancestry from the Epigravettians of South-Eastern Europe, were initially the same group like Anatolian- and Caucasus Hunter & Gatherers (Dzudzuana?), with the only difference that the Western Hunter & Gatherers had less of this Middle Eastern, basal Eurasian ancestry than Anatolian and Caucasus Hg's?
This is likely but Lazaridis reckons Dzudzuana is somewhat distinct to CHG. His 2018 paper states a distinct cluster in the Caucasus. CHG effectively forms with migrating ANE groups . Dzudzuana though in his paper is stipulated to be very anciently related to the villabruna cluster which encompasses WHG. AHG would follow suite, intuitively having more basal Eurasian ancestry. This is info off the top of my head and may need revision so let’s keep the discussion open.
@@AncestralBrew Isn't CHG just ANE + Dzudzuana + basal Eurasian, maybe with a lot of drift due to long isolation in the Caucasus mountains? And WHG are some sort of heavily drifted Dzudzuana?
@@AncestralBrew Interestingly, there is also archeological evidence that the Aurignacian culture was spread from Europe to the Middle East. I think all those hunter & gatherer groups we label AHG, WHG and so on were initially Aurignacians.
@@AncestralBrew Btw it would be cool if you mentioned some of these populations as being part of the Levantine genepool as well, because they are. For example, all Lebanese have Eurasian Steppe ancestry and Anatolian farmer. Many of us (if not all) have a small amount of WHG, though this would probably be because of European admixture. But those three are there, and my point in mentioning this is to show that we're all more connected than we think. Esp. when it comes to Europe, the Caucuses and the Levant (at least as far as Lebanon).
all the people from that area form the caucasoid ethnic group. Europeans,Middle easterners, Jews and west asians are basically related because thats where those people intially came from before they went their ways. Even northern Euros share some commonality with North Eurasians which means they are cousins of siberians and native americans because they share a common ancestor indirectly.@@freepagan
I'm not sure why you have the Lusitanians labeled as Celtic. I can see Celtic influenced but "Celtic" I don't think so. They were always strong and independent and the Romans took hundreds of years to subdue them.
Its because most “celts” aren’t really celtic in terms of autosomal dna but bell beakers who got celticized culturally and spoke celtic language because the real actual celts who came from the same source as the earliest italics conquered them (La Tene/continental celts from Austria/Alps). So yeah most “celts” in popular culture such as the hispanic/iberian celts (such as the cantabrians as well as the celtiberians ofcourse) and the insular celts (british isles ones, britons&gaels) are really just genetically bell beaker populations, the northern ones being more steppe admixed (WSH) while the southern ones being more neolithic farmer (EEF). Bell beakers were IE speakers themselves but not of the celtic branch, just a whole dif branch. I believe lusitanian language was one of those original bell beaker IE languages.
The Romans conquored the lusitanians fairly easily, so much so that they assimilated their language completely. The Vasconians, the ancestors of the Basques, on the other hand they took the longest to conqueor. The Basques are the only people of Iberia to not be assimilated completely as they still have their language.
You're doing a good work.Can you make one on romanians? I know we are mostly neolitic farmers(45-50 procent) western hunter-gatherers(30 procent) and indo-europeans, yamnaya ( 20-25 procent).Thanks
Nothing wrong with nationalism. Diversity, OTOH, results in higher crime rates, lower civic engagement, less social trust, and politicians who exploit racial differences to divide and conquer. Good fences, as they say, create good neighbors.
@@julybeeb4614 Modern day Turks largely descend from people who were already living in Anatolia (such as Greeks, Armenians and other Indo-European people) BEFORE the arrival of Seljuk Turks, there was never a population replacement. Seljuk Turks (who were a powerful minority) mixed with local Anatolians. The local population of Anatalia was simply Turkified and that is precisely why modern day Turks look nothing like Kazakhs, for example.
Modern anatolians are heavily armenoid admixed so not really. If anything, iberians (as well as all west meds, especially the sardinians) most closely resemble the ancient neolithic anatolians (ANF).
Según 23andme yo soy 100% ibérico Y mucha gente segun los resultados que yo he visto en el país no tiene nada de norteafricano. Sin embargo veo decenas de norteafricanos que llegan a tener 25% de iberico...😮
Están mal y no son precisos los test de adn que se toman la mayoria de norteafricanos (los resultados comerciales de myheritage son basura, ni caso). Si se tomasen 23andme como tú anotarían 100% norteafricano. Y si su te tomases el test de myheritage que es muy impreciso anotarías algo de norteafricano probablemente, lo mismo que ellos anotan algo de ibérico. No sé si me entiendes. Está fatal y cuentan ancestria muy antigua como si fuese moderna.
Cuando los Moros fueron espulsados del Norte de España llevaron consigo adn Iberico, además de que los Bereberes de Marruecos parecen tener mezcla Iberica
@@user-yt3xd2jl6dsi, y en el resultado comercial de 23andme está incluido en los porcentajes de o bien “spanish&portuguese” o de “north african”, ya que te muestra la ancestria reciente y no la antigua
I have Celtic & Germanic (maternal side), Middle Eastern & South Asian (paternal side) ancestries. What DNA test/s (company/ies) would you recommend for me?
Informative video. I was told that the term 'Iberia' is derived or associated w/ 'Hebrew', and that there is a Hebrew mixture of genetics among Spaniards as well. Do you have information on this? Thank you.
The name Iberia comes from a river, and that is how it was called by the Greeks. There also lived on the peninsula a people called Iberians... something that everyone who has read a little knows perfectly well.
They left little legacy, the punics (carthaginians/phoenician). I don’t deny it, im myself from the region they left the most legacy both archeological and genetical but i think the latter is 98% due to the romans and the later imperial migrations, rather than because of the Punics themselves.
I live in Spain and know many Lebanese people in Australia. They are rather distinct phenotypically to eastern meds. A misconception is that Spaniards resemble other Mediterraneans like Italians and Greeks who for the most part share some similarities with Eastern Mediterraneans. The Spaniards however, with their additional WHG ancestry are more like the southern French and northern Italians, with a distinct Celtic admixture profile.
In reality, Spaniards and Portuguese have very little Middle Eastern DNA. Italy and Greece have way more, for example. Just because they tend to have dark hair and brown eyes, doesn't mean they look Middle Eastern.
there is some overlap due to high Anatolian farmer in both population but still for the most part even the Dark Spaniards/Iberian still look more " western " than eastern due to higher WHG and higher steppe ancestry for example typical dark Spaniards live.staticflickr.com/8424/7757560928_ae94f6ec88.jpg typical Eastern med Levantine sernooa.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/0FACC5E4-E63B-4466-948B-5FBF92CDD971.jpeg
They did certainly look better than your average modern human because they were less or not degenerated at all due to bad nutrition. But that goes for all ancient human groups really, not just the Indoeuropeans/aryans. I bet even the farmers looked more like “models” than modern people on average.
Interesting. I recently found out that i am part iberian/basque (and slightly African). We always thought we were "native american" on that side. some of our relatives had darker skin and we were told we were native american.
My family is of Andalusian origin, from Granada and Malaga, but before that from the Arabian Peninsula, and because 300 years ago in Libya, we have relatives with the same surnames in Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia, the Levant, and the Arabian Peninsula, and through genetic testing in Spain. Im on A-l419
3:01 "The Moors who ruled Iberia for 800 years" is a hyperbolic statement. The battle of Las Navas de Tolosa in 1212 sealed the Christian reconquista of the Iberian peninsula. Only the kingdom a Granada survived until 1492 as a vassal state of the kingdom of Castilla.
Al Andalous a duré 711 à 1236 , puis il ne reste que Grenade j'usqu'a 1492 Donc les Musulmans n'ont pas gouverné L'Hispania 800 annes comme vous dites mais 525 annes , Grenade ne représente pas la péninsule IBÉRIQUE 😊
@@jojolafrite9265ni tan siquiera eso, desde el primer siglo empezaron a perder territorio desde Asturias en el 722 y después siglo a siglo, rechazados tras las fronteras del Río Duero, y así poco a poco. No fueron unas fechas fijas. La reconquista por los cristianos comenzó en Asturias creándose el primer reino cristiano asturleonés. En el siglo 8.
@@egutiguti3337 Tambien se dice que fué en 718 la derrota de los moros frente a Pelayo nuestro Heroe
El camino fué muy largo , nuestros Ancestros lo consigieron en 1492 ....y las Americas por si fuera Poco💪🇪🇦✝️
@@NazarioOrbe En 1235 la péninsule IBÉRIQUE n'étais plus musulmane. Il y avait les Royaumes chrétiens comme le Portugal , Castille , Aragon .
Les taifas a cette époque ils avaient rejoint les CHRÉTIENS. Et Grenade si elle a tenue deux siècles de plus , cet parceque elle payé des très forts impôts au Espagnols qui en 1492 prendra fin
@@jojolafrite9265 that isn't accurate, by the 9th century a chunk of Spain was already Christian (the north) and by 1031 a chunk of the country was christian already.
My ancestry is mostly from northern Iberia, and I’m proud of our Celtic heritage.
My family originates from a northern Spain too. No wonder I love Irish culture and music so much.
@@YmustTh3w0rldG0r0und It’s because our people are connected. There was a genetic study that revealed that Irish peoples DNA is closest to the northern Spanish. The Celts of Iberia fled to Ireland after Rome invaded the peninsula
@@uptown_rider8078 so then that means the Irish are Spanish not that the Spanish are Celtic.
@@clinkedylinkedy1 The Irish are genetically closest to northern Spaniards, which is from the Celtic tribes that lived in that region
Basque ,Native Californian and Irish
💜
Im Cuban but im overwhelming Iberian, 85% with French , Welsh, Scottish and North African.
That is interesting because the majority of the French who fled the Haitian Revolution (1790-1804) went to Cuba, the Orienté region, and Louisiana.
You must be descended from French colonists.
Wouldn’t be surprised if the Welsh and Scottish ancestry actually counts as the Celts that inhabited the Iberian peninsula.
@TheBigdaddy64
Do you have grandparents or great-grandparents who were big landowners, Sugar can land owners? Because the french got themselves busy in Cuba, developing the land by themselves.
Many got succesful and assimilated in the local Cuba créole bourgeoisie.
Millones de españoles emigraron a Cuba y Argentina en el siglo XIX, siendo cubano me extraña que no lo sepa, es más, a día de hoy todavía hay familias cubanas con familiares en España. El mismo Fidel Castro era medio español y tenía y sigue teniendo familia en Galicia. Lo que me extraña es que Vd. desconozca esto que es historia de antes de ayer.
By "getting themselves busy" I imagine you mean going right back to trafficking in and enslaving black people.
Oi a un esperto que dijo que todo lo mas que puede llegar el ADN son 200 años atras, yo lo unico que se es que soy del planeta tierra
4:39 - 4:44 - Portugal!
Very interesting
Super cool video...what about the Phoenician influence?
Just cultural, like the Arabs
@@gundissalinus 🥂
Pues que fue cultural más que genética.
These Phoenicians had no genetic influence, they were just traders. Even in their wars, they relied on the Iberians, Berbers, and Gauls.
it's difficult to tell, we need more deep ancestry and regional analysis. the J2 is very present in Coastal Portugal and close (like in Coimbra) and former Phoenician colonies in Spain.
"Y-chromosome diversity in central Portugal reveals genetic signatures regarding
Phoenician colonization" - Martiniano & alt.
Well, the close origins can be known, but the distant origins, Anatolia and others, I think, are just hypotheses.
The two main conquerors of Iberia have been the Roman and Muslim Empires. The Romans spoke Latin and Muslims spoke Arabic. Both the Romans and Arabs brought in settlers to assimilate the Iberians. However, in the genetic profile of the of today's Iberians, on the average, Italian and Arab/Berber DNA is on the average less than 5%, and Jewish is even less. Other trace DNA is British, Scandinavian, French/German which sometimes is higher. Why?
Romans and Muslim came to assimilate as they did in France with the Gaul/Frankish population. This explains how Portugal with a small population of 17,000,000 can produce a country like Brazil with over 200,000,000 people speaking Portuguese. Or Spain with 40,000,000 produce 600,000,000 Spanish speakers in Hispanic America.
Yup!
Very interesting. Thank you
Im from Spain and i have 60% iberian, 15% german, 15% (irish, Scottish and wales), 8% Balkan and 2% north African.
¿Y de portugues que tál?
@@AntonioGonzalezJr-un1gb ?
@@Fati.Ferreiro-Es que tu apellido es portugues, lo quieras o no. Digo, si es que así te llamas en verdad. Saludos ✌️
@@AntonioGonzalezJr-un1gb soy gallega, asique estoy segura que mi apellido es gallego 🙃. Por último, si, me llamo así.
@@Fati.Ferreiro -Ah que bueno! ¡Mucho gusto en conocerte! Entonces eres de España y de Galicia. Y sabes, yo nunca pensé que los gallegos y portugueses tuvieran los mismos apellidos, me equivoqué, mil disculpas....De hecho, yo también tengo um poco de sangre portuguesa ,ya que mi abuela materna tenía el apellido Maciel. Saludos 😉✌️
Genetics are not politics, but they can be
No. Los Hispanos hemos superado al Nazismo con nuestra genética. No volvera a pasar.Y si nos pinchan fundaremos una nueva Unión Transoceánica Hispana con sedes en Lima, Veracruz y Madrid uniendo politicamente a 300 millones de hispanohablantes con un pasado común.
If any, they should be the only politics.
Please do a video on Nepali people, I beg you!
Do you know the wars of El Cid and Luís de Camões?, El Cid is Giorgi Saakadze from Spain and Luís de Camões he is the same Rustaveli, this country is similar to us, we are one people
do a video for qatar and uae please
Do Yemen please
yesss
The moors ruled Iberia for 800 years?!?
LOL... They were isolated in Granada, a small region of Andalucía, 800 years.
What's next, "ENGLAND HAS RULED SPAIN DURING 200 YEARS BECAUSE THEY HAVE GIBRALTAR"???
The Muslims made a great contribution to the Golden Age.
we need Armenia
The people in modern day New Mexico are descendants a lot of them came from Galicia and ASTURA. they actually have more Spanish DNA than most Spanish do. Because they closed the gap. There are some that have some Jewish dna and some that might have some Arab dna and there is some that's got far E DNA. But most of them are between 60 to 75% Spanish this may be some add mixture of Arab Jewish Native American is the second one.
Can you make a video about the DNA of Bangali ( Bangladeshi)
What about videos on Arabs and Jordanians
It was just a cultural influence
@@FREEd5407 some Jordanians have an Arab component but they aren't original from Arabia they are did ethnicity similar but different with similar cultures
@YadinZedek777, Not sure about the Spanish but the Portuguese share more with the Egyptian Copts and Egyptians in general according to the 23 & Me estimates I've seen. But when it's present it's less than 1%. I do come across a few Y-DNA samples with origins in the Arabian peninsula but much less than North African. North West African is much more common than anything from the Middle East but still a small percentage.
@@afaria6173 I appreciate your response, it's very informative for the video, but my question is more so where is the video for Arabs and Jordanians
You did forget jewish, who are a significant 20% sefardí.
Lies,lies and more lies...
Great video, Iberian history and civilizations are very underrated, and appreciated. Spaniards and Portuguese were some of the first to extensively explore the world. By the way, are you interested in the evolution and spread of light skin alleles, as I'm curious as to how dark the Western Hunter Gatherers actually were?
Not very dark. They're a European group and had blue eyes.
Españoles y portugueses somos hermanos 😊
I think between a Persian and a Dravidian.
@@aag3752Basically people were darker before but you’re right. That’s why dravidians and turkics proto-mongols are your farthest cousins. As they’re indo-europeans too.
Neolithic Farmers and Mesolithic Shepherds are brought from AfroAsiatics people group ( indigenous northern africans and mideasterns, first occupier of Southern Europe, Anatolia, Persians historical lands, and Horn of Africa )
Not that dark, olive skin maybe
Iberia is the first civilization. Europe was already inhabited by Georgians, Pelasgians, Etruscans, Picts, Basques, Celt-Iberians are Iberian people, today's Europe arose as a result of Indo-Europeans and Iberian people, Iberians lived there before Indo-European people
Sicily have a lot iberian admix specially west sicily aragonese-castillian kingdom of sicily 1282/1714 ,400 years of brother mediterranean alliance
You and I should clarify one issue. Are you sicilian? In Georgian it means laught, and I didn't know if it was related to Iberia, but I knew that its name is a Georgian word.
a lot, i don't know..
i understand that,the first inhabitants of spain,as well as ötzi,and the first ones crossing anatolia 8000 years ago to europe,were the sardinian dna closely related people from ancient anatolia,which must have also contributed to the ancient dna of greece as well as all the mediterranean...about the basques and their language...some researchers say,their difference lies in scythian ancestry,which is not indo european...
basques are the closest modern people to the sardinians because of ANF dna plus WHG dna,. the Scythians were Indo-Iranic and most likely where red hair originated from. They contributed to more Northern and Eastern euro dna.
I am going to give a very simple explanation: in Spain there are no remains of Roman genetics, even less than in England (the Romans spent almost a thousand years in Spain); nor Visigothic, although they ruled for centuries and they say they remained in the nobility (for more than a thousand years); but the best thing, the greatest proportion of Celtic genetics is in the east and southeast (where the Islamist-Aryan Visigoths of Tingitana stayed the longest) and the greatest proportion of blood (let's say North African), in the north, more specifically in the northwest , which is where the alleged Islamists did not remain (we will call them non-Muslim Arian Christians, which explains everything better).
As you can see, genetics denies the historical statement and with even greater reason they deny that there was never any reconquest, nor was there anything to conquer, if they were always the same, at least during the last 5000 years.
A comment, the Anglo-Saxon world in the interest of its church and its nationalism has supported the extermination of the British population by the Anglo-Saxons (for centuries); but genetics says that it is false, because the British are still there and they are also the vast majority. It seems that Europe has remained practically pre-Roman and Spain is no exception.
Furthermore, it seems important to me, Iberian genetics does not end in the Pyrenees, but remains a majority throughout the south of France, alien to all the nationalist stories told. History and genetics don't mix well, it seems. In other words, history is the greatest lie ever told, like the conquest of America, which was conquered by the Indians, in reality, an army of 300,000 warriors behind the back of Cortes, the liberator.
And through this story the English-speaking world expels Spain from the world (because it is genocidal, they deny the diseases) and from Europe (as non-whites, genetics had not yet been invented) as P. Powell the Hispanist stated, in his book “Tree of Hate”, which should be required reading around the world. The English have tried it and best of all, for convenience, they have all accepted it.
The conclusion is that North African genetics were maintained in the north, which has nothing to do with the genetics of North Africa today (they arrived thousands of years before, just like in France or Germany, as farmers) and on the that those Muslims (Arian Christians) had no influence, because they did not occupy the territory except occasionally. In the south and east of the peninsula (Mediterranean area) is the most genetically Celtic area and if the Muslims (Arian Christians) remained there, there they left their genetics, which is r1b1, that is, Celtic, that is, they are the same Celts that were there before. of the religious civil war that lasted 8 centuries.
History developed based on nationalism everywhere, Rome that survived as the Vatican power considered that this was the history that suited itself for Spain, which did not escape its dominance in the Middle Ages, except for the Western Schism. , and which the rest of Europe decided to get rid of by creating the Protestant world, for a reason.
"no remains of Roman genetics, " utterly false, i suggest you see the most complet study so far ab Iberian DNA.
My grandfather was born in Spain my father was born in Cuba I was born in California we just can’t stay in one place I wonder about my son ??
@@alvaroobregon4596 ¡No te creo! Ya que tienes.el retraro de un presidente mexicano en tu perfil, y dejame decirte que los cubanos no se interesan mucho en la historia mexicana, mas que para pasar por el territorio, ya sea por tierra ó mar cuando se escapan en balsas.. P..D Oye chico, no te pongas a inventar marañas.😁✌️
@@AntonioGonzalezJr-un1gb me mommy my love to the death by the way he was Spanish gave his life for your people and that's the thanks he gits f you he gave you the pride you carry fool
My ancestry is 49.2% European, with {46.8% Southern European)-(39.2% Spanish & Portuguese)-(3.2% Italian)-(4.4% Broadly Southern European)-(1.5% Ashkenazi)-(0.9% Broadley European}, wish I knew what exactly this meant, however my other half is (42.1 Indigenous American).
I am from Spain. I have 14,7% of Sardinian DNA (now I get is Western hunter gatherers), which is close to the 13% average. Then I have 74% Iberian, 5,5% Ashkenazi, 2,2% Finnish, 2% Scandinavian and 1,6% Baltic.
I’m from El Salvador, Central America and I have 21% Spanish, 3% Sardinia, 5% Scotland, 4% Basque.
My Cuban father had small percentage of dna from the Caucasus/Black sea
Now must be 20% latinoAmerica, 15% Africa.
In general the video is good, however, most studies show Galicia to have more North African ancestry than Extremadura, and in any case, both, Galicia and Extremadura show more North African lineage than Castile and Leon.
Saudi arábia dna and jordanian Dna
Never tested, anyone recommend a particular test better than other?
Well I didnt expect this
A moor can’t make a video about Spain without making it about the moors…
We have very little records about pre Roman Iberia. We at best can say Ancient Iberians had Greek, Phoenician and Celtic heritage. Overall I believe Iberia to have predominantly Latin ancestry. Even today the Spanish look like ancient Romans and they look similar to Italians almost indistinguishable. Iberia was by far the most Romanized province thats why its past is a mystery the natives accepted Roman culture so easily very few traces of pre Roman Iberian culture remains.
Ancient iron age iberians and the original/iron age monarchy/republican era romans / italics looked similar because they were both predominately ANF (anatolian Neolithic farmer)
this is incorrect. Spain is mostly celtic and western european. Italy is more Mediterranean with some dna from the levant. Spain is mostly R1b and Italy is usually J
Iberia is Georgia, country. Europe was already inhabited by Pelasgians, Etruscans, Picts, Basques, Celt-Iberians are Iberian people, today's Europe arose as a result of Indo-Europeans and Iberian people, Iberians lived there before Indo-European people.
The Roman invasion didn't mean Romans migration. Iberians just accepted Roman citizenship.
@@michaelcandido2824 "mostly celtic " the celts arrived too late. we can assume they mixed cultural and genetically with Native Iberians of varied cultures. (if Iron Age Central and North Europe influx is interpreted correctly as celtic). "R1b and Italy is usually J" tells nothing. Armenia is R1b.
🇪🇸 Soy sur atlántico fenotipo nórdico. Mi ADN. 78% R1b, 20% R13b ibérico, R1a, 2%.
😆 stop with those outdated racial classification
Would love to know more about Spanish DNA. Why did so many migrate to Spain?
Por el clima, iban huyendo de la glaciación.
I have 40% Spanish 🇪🇸 blood🩸so this was refreshing to see. Thanks for this Ancestralbrew!
Glad you enjoyed it!
@@AncestralBrewI would be interested for your services.
იცი სიდის ომები და კამოინში, სიდი ესპანეთის გიორგი სააკაძეა და კამოინში იგივე რუსთაველია, გვგავს ეს ქვეყანა აბა რა, ერთი ხალხი ვართ
Hello! Thanks for all your videos! I love all this and as a Spanish person I will tell you my DNA results: according to Genomelink I have 40% First Farmers, 34% Steppe Pastor, 12% Hunter Gatherers and the rest from South Asia basically 9%, West Africa 3 %, Native American 1% and East Asian 1%. I don't know how reliable these tests are, because I get very different ancestry results in My Heritage, Genomelink, MyTrueAncestry... but it's all curious.
Genomelink and all those sites are garbage and misleading. Illustrativedna is more accurate and its one of the only places you should upload your raw data to, along with gedmatch if you want and maybe codegen (for free detailed uncensored health report)
Spanish... or Hispanic? The percentage of Native American, West African and Asian (as a whole) is very strange in Spain... but very normal in Latin Americans.
@@arkaitzetxeandia7542Hello Akaitz! I am Spanish, my entire family is from the Iberian Peninsula until a long time ago. This report refers to something very ancient, it would be from thousands of years ago. The thing about Asia on other pages does appear to me as Western Asia as more recent and the same to my mother. In My Heritage:86.9 Iberian (two groups);10 Italian not specified (Italy:Northern Italy,Switzerland,Austria,Monaco,a part of Northwest Albania);3.1 Western Asia not specified (Iran, Lebanon,Georgia, Armenia, Azerbaijan...).My Heritage (my mother) identical general percentage to mine. As a difference, she has 4 different Iberian genetic groups, 2 from France and 2 from Basque. We were surprised that it puts DNA in all of France already in the 20th century (it brings a timeline). It puts me, but further back. In Genomelink I get without specifying: 46% Northwest Europe (British, French, German, Irish or Scandinavian)39% Other European (Italy, Spain, Hungary, Albania, etc.)10% Eastern Europe (Estonian, Finnish, Russian, Polish or Ukrainian), 1% Asian, 1% African, 4% Arctic or Middle East. My mother gets more in Eastern Europe. In Tell me Gen it gives me 99.4% European, of which Iberian was 98.8%. I laughed a lot when I saw it. The rest put European Jew 0.6% and Egyptian 0.5%. I was amazed by this last one, but the percentages are so low that, well, I don't know.In My True Ancestry they seem to be more refined. In ancient towns, I especially have from the current area of the Balkans, Italy, France, Germany and the Iberian Peninsula. I obtained: Illyrios (39.7%). I believe this people is the basis of Spanish genetics, my mother and my husband (Galician) also have them in large quantities. I understand that they were in what is now Albania, Serbia... Etruscans, I believe, were an indigenous Italian people ( 20%), Romans of Hispania 8.3%, Aquitanians (French Basque Country area) 5.68, Rhaeti 5.32%, Gauls (French Celts 3.91%), Al Andalus does not specify 3.76%; Visigoths 3 .63%, Iberians 3.08%, Pannonian Illyrians 2.9; Daunii 0.86;Samnites 0.73; Scordisci 0.59; Corinthian Greeks 0.39; Macedonians 0.32; Vascons 0.2; Franks 0.17; Phoenicians 0.1 and Dacians 0.13. My mother is similar, except that she has increased the percentage of Visigoths to 8.3, Aquitanians 7.19 Gauls 5.47, also more Rhaeti, Franks and Iberians than me. Something appears to my mother that can explain Asia. Western Scythians and the Parthian Empire appear, so something very distant comes from there, but I suppose the most recent thing is that we share heritage with Eastern Europe and I think that is normal for a Spaniard, Spain was populated like that, although I have also I thought about whether there could be any gypsy ancestors that we had some genetic fingerprint on, but I have no idea. According to Genomelink, both my mother and I would also have Viking ancestors, according to what Iron Age England tells me, but I don't know how reliable this is. It gives me a Viking index of 65% and that I have Scandinavian Vikings especially and British ones. I see My True Ancestry as more real, but I suppose that everything is complementary and that we are a cocktail of ethnicities that makes us a good genetic historical puzzle.
@@arkaitzetxeandia7542 Hello Arkaitz! I'm Spanish, my entire family is from the Iberian Peninsula until a long time ago. This report refers to something very ancient, it would be from thousands of years ago. The thing about Asia on other pages does appear to me as Western Asia as more recent and the same to my mother. In My Heritage:86.9 Iberian (two groups);10 Italian not specified (Italy:Northern Italy,Switzerland,Austria,Monaco,a part of Northwest Albania);3.1 Western Asia not specified (Iran, Lebanon,Georgia, Armenia, Azerbaijan...).My Heritage (my mother) identical general percentage to mine. As a difference, she has 4 different Iberian genetic groups, 2 from France and 2 from Basque. We were surprised that it puts DNA in all of France already in the 20th century (it brings a timeline). It puts me, but further back. In Genomelink I get without specifying: 46% Northwest Europe (British, French, German, Irish or Scandinavian)39% Other European (Italy, Spain, Hungary, Albania, etc.)10% Eastern Europe (Estonian, Finnish, Russian, Polish or Ukrainian), 1% Asian, 1% African, 4% Arctic or Middle East. My mother gets more in Eastern Europe. In Tell me Gen it gives me 99.4% European, of which Iberian was 98.8%. I laughed a lot when I saw it. The rest put European Jew 0.6% and Egyptian 0.5%. I was amazed by this last one, but the percentages are so low that, well, I don't know.In My True Ancestry they seem to be more refined. In ancient towns, I especially have from the current area of the Balkans, Italy, France, Germany and the Iberian Peninsula. I obtained: Illyrios (39.7%). I believe this people is the basis of Spanish genetics, my mother and my husband (Galician) also have them in large quantities. I understand that they were in what is now Albania, Serbia... Etruscans, I believe, were an indigenous Italian people ( 20%), Romans of Hispania 8.3%, Aquitanians (French Basque Country area) 5.68, Rhaeti 5.32%, Gauls (French Celts 3.91%), Al Andalus does not specify 3.76%; Visigoths 3 .63%, Iberians 3.08%, Pannonian Illyrians 2.9; Daunii 0.86;Samnites 0.73; Scordisci 0.59; Corinthian Greeks 0.39; Macedonians 0.32; Vascons 0.2; Franks 0.17; Phoenicians 0.1 and Dacians 0.13. My mother is similar, except that she has increased the percentage of Visigoths to 8.3, Aquitanians 7.19 Gauls 5.47, also more Rhaeti, Franks and Iberians than me. Something appears to my mother that can explain Asia. Western Scythians and the Parthian Empire appear, so something very distant comes from there, but I suppose the most recent thing is that we share heritage with Eastern Europe and I think that is normal for a Spaniard, Spain was populated like that. According to Genomelink, both my mother and I would also have Viking ancestors, according to what Iron Age England tells me, but I don't know how reliable this is. It gives me a Viking index of 65% and that I have Scandinavian Vikings especially and British ones. I suppose that everything is complementary and that we are a cocktail of ethnicities that makes us a good genetic historical puzzle.
@@esthermc4845-Yo creo que usted ha de ser de ascendencia cubana ó boricua. Saludos 😂✌️
Kurdish DNA please! ❤
ruclips.net/video/2pI77l8wB5c/видео.html is in German
Really a good job man, all my respects.
I was in the wrong video that was uploaded in Espanol
hahaha make sure you guys tune into the right language
@@AncestralBrew alright bro
@@AncestralBrewwhy are you in Spain?
@@4bidden1 It was the most logical choice after Brazil. I’ve got a visa now so I can’t leave until I get my residency card, so I’m locked in for the next couple months.
@@AncestralBrew nice. Consider doing a video on Neanderthal genetics..if they were still alive today, would people still consider them a separate species?
What about the vandals they seem to be a mystery are they amazighs?
The Vandals were a Germanic group from Northern Europe that in the time of Rome's fall, migrated to Iberian Peninsula and later to North Africa. Actually the name Al-Andalus means "Land of the Vandals".
Canary Islands were amazingh for this tese Spaniards have high more African genetics
Make a video About Latin American crypto jews
Please do a video for the Kurds
can you do tunisa next plz
If you believe in god , can you tell us where did prophet adam came from ... i think he came from middle-east to be more specific al sham (Levant) like Palestine or syria because the oldest cities are there ... what do you think
No mention of Sephardic who had inhabited the region for over 2,000 years ?
I left your channel because you had announced that you would no longer make "videos about genetics "however you seem to not have been serious that statement .
Love how all these vids show these ancient people as complete CHADS 😂
Please Short
Im 33 percent Irish 3 percent from Spain
You skipped the Roman Period, which also had significant north African heritage.
The Berbers did not mix with the Romans, but always lived outside their control, even if their land was invaded.
Can you do one for India with more details especially covering the eastern,Northeastern part as well?
🔥🌨🌈
Nice
It seems that he has forgotten the 300 years of Scandinavian government known as Visigoths, but of course since the Scandinavians are actually genetically Slavs, I accept it as valid.
I would say Visigoths are Germans, not Scandinavian, but you right, they surely left some DNA in Spain as 250k of them crossed the Pyrenees.
@@juanv5375 Okay, you caught me, maybe that's why 40% of Spanish names are of Germanic origin, possibly they were more Germanic than Scandinavian if in the 5th century there were half a million out of 6 million Spaniards, well we have something from both peoples.
@@pepegotera8598 yes cultural heritage is always bigger, and you right lots of names and surnames in Spain have Germanic origins.
Please do kabyle Berber people 🇩🇿
Amazing video. I like that it was more detailed. I see that you still take it to heart when some of the people who watch your videos end up having nationalist perspectives. I hope that you don't take this personally but that is a bit narcissistic. I'll assure you that a 5 or 10 molinute video made by you didnt contribute a lot to that. I think that you're overthinking that.
I’m curious about Bavarian, Austrian, and Swiss ancestry. Hope I can see you cover them one day!
Could you do a video about Finland, or generaly about a haplogroup N?
what about the Roma? Pretty sure my family were Erromintxela and or Morisco but I'm still trying to figure it out.
Gypsies are barely 1.5 - 2% of the population of Spain... and they have always lived quite segregated.
@@arkaitzetxeandia7542 thats not true. There have been over 600 years of shared history. Plus there are tons of groups of Mestizo people that in Spain mean mixed Spaniard and Roma. It may not be talked about in the history books because of racism but Roma influence is strong and current. Flamenco is a Roma art form.
@@arkaitzetxeandia7542 no community is a monolith. We are all converging worlds and stories. Traditional known info is just part of the story.
@@clinkedylinkedy1, Gypsies have been around for just over 500 years ALL OVER EUROPE, in fact Spain is one of the last countries on the continent to which they arrived. No "Strong influence". Where I live, in the Basque Country, there are hardly any gypsies, I have never met any in my personal circle... and I am already 56 years old.
Awesome video👏 How about Azorian (Açores) Portuguese people dna?🧬
Wow,great documentary pre history nd ancient, middle ages 😎🙏 history! Love 💘😘 it.
What about Sephardic Jewish? 20% of Spaniards have at least a little Sephardic ancestry due to the Crypto-Jews who assimilated.
Nope
@@deanoal933 Yes there was a study that confirmed. They actually have more Sephardic than North African admixture.
Strange enough, my DNA shows Ashkenazi with my mostly Hispanic ancestors.
@@salvadormartin4203 DNA results largely depend on the reference populations that the DNA testing company uses. If they have a smaller reference population it won't be as accurate at identifying a region. The test might confuse some parts of your DNA because they look similar. Also when you see regions in your results, it can include admixtures. So another company might have Sephardic but the one you used didn't say it because that makeup was not uncommon for their gene pool of another region if that makes sense.
Or maybe you do have an ancestor with it, you'll just have to do more research.
Spain don't accept nor africa, arab, or sephardic jew because ashamed
Plz do Jordanian DNA
could you do a video on west african peoples like hausa fulani, yoruba and ebira ?
Do a video for the arabian peninsula
Learning a lot from your videos in how to understand better my ancient DNA. On my dad's side there is Iberian. I was looking for more Moorish ancestry around Andalusia, like the energy of Southern Spain, but it turns out in all of Spain the DNA from dad's side is closer to Celtic Iberian and Basque. Interesting.
That’s because Spaniards don’t have moorish ancestry, they were all kicked out of the peninsula when we took back our land
Another Troll 🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@uptown_rider8078Viva Espana
The moors were in Spain for 800 years, you mean not one mixed their dna with a Spaniard in all that time?
@@TheAll5555 The only way they would have mixed their DNA would have been through r🦍, but the Iberians did not want to mix with enemy invaders that stole their land
Fantastic video thank you. Also could I talk you into doing a video. About Hannibal Barca and the origins of the carthaginians. Please it'll be much appreciated thank you. Also you have a new subscriber👍💯
Great video Thanks. I'm Mexican with 87% southern European (64% from Iberia) and 23% from the Americas
87% + 23%, the sum is 110%. Some information is not correct.
Oooops 77% from different locations in southern Europe mostly Spain and 23% from different locations in Mexico. Details too many to list. @@arkaitzetxeandia7542
It would be very interesting to compare Basque and Georgian DNA, because the Basque language and Georgian language have many ancient words in common. There has to be some connection
basques are bascially sardinians with western hunter gather admixture. Mostly ANF
@@michaelcandido2824No, they're also heavily Indo-European, compared to the Sardinians, around 25%
A lot of people believe that, but it isn't proven. There are theories saying that the Vascons and Aquitanians (ancestors of the Basques, Gascons and Aragonese people of the Pyrenees) are connected to the Georgians, and/or possibly the Chechens, the Ingush or the Circassians. I remember reading a compared vocabulary list of Chechen and Basque a while ago, but I lost it sadly.
I think that there might be some truth to it. Southern Europeans are descended mainly from the Early Neolithic Farmers from Anatolia (only the Basque still speak their language though). I know that some linguistic and genetic studies linked the Anatolian people and also the Minoan people with the Caucasus Hunter-Gatherers.
Likewise... many people mocked the Romans for the theories regarding descending from Trojans and same for the Etruscan being descended from people from Anatolia, but modern genetic data tend to confirm fringe theories like this more and more.
So... nothing is impossible.
@@michaelcandido2824 They're closer to the British Islanders than they're to Sardinians.
Please do Latin America as a whole if you can
Could it be that the Western Hunter & Gatherers, who mainly derived their ancestry from the Epigravettians of South-Eastern Europe, were initially the same group like Anatolian- and Caucasus Hunter & Gatherers (Dzudzuana?), with the only difference that the Western Hunter & Gatherers had less of this Middle Eastern, basal Eurasian ancestry than Anatolian and Caucasus Hg's?
This is likely but Lazaridis reckons Dzudzuana is somewhat distinct to CHG. His 2018 paper states a distinct cluster in the Caucasus. CHG effectively forms with migrating ANE groups . Dzudzuana though in his paper is stipulated to be very anciently related to the villabruna cluster which encompasses WHG. AHG would follow suite, intuitively having more basal Eurasian ancestry. This is info off the top of my head and may need revision so let’s keep the discussion open.
@@AncestralBrew Isn't CHG just ANE + Dzudzuana + basal Eurasian, maybe with a lot of drift due to long isolation in the Caucasus mountains? And WHG are some sort of heavily drifted Dzudzuana?
@@AncestralBrew Interestingly, there is also archeological evidence that the Aurignacian culture was spread from Europe to the Middle East. I think all those hunter & gatherer groups we label AHG, WHG and so on were initially Aurignacians.
@@AncestralBrew Btw it would be cool if you mentioned some of these populations as being part of the Levantine genepool as well, because they are. For example, all Lebanese have Eurasian Steppe ancestry and Anatolian farmer. Many of us (if not all) have a small amount of WHG, though this would probably be because of European admixture. But those three are there, and my point in mentioning this is to show that we're all more connected than we think. Esp. when it comes to Europe, the Caucuses and the Levant (at least as far as Lebanon).
all the people from that area form the caucasoid ethnic group. Europeans,Middle easterners, Jews and west asians are basically related because thats where those people intially came from before they went their ways. Even northern Euros share some commonality with North Eurasians which means they are cousins of siberians and native americans because they share a common ancestor indirectly.@@freepagan
I'm not sure why you have the Lusitanians labeled as Celtic. I can see Celtic influenced but "Celtic" I don't think so. They were always strong and independent and the Romans took hundreds of years to subdue them.
Its because most “celts” aren’t really celtic in terms of autosomal dna but bell beakers who got celticized culturally and spoke celtic language because the real actual celts who came from the same source as the earliest italics conquered them (La Tene/continental celts from Austria/Alps).
So yeah most “celts” in popular culture such as the hispanic/iberian celts (such as the cantabrians as well as the celtiberians ofcourse) and the insular celts (british isles ones, britons&gaels) are really just genetically bell beaker populations, the northern ones being more steppe admixed (WSH) while the southern ones being more neolithic farmer (EEF). Bell beakers were IE speakers themselves but not of the celtic branch, just a whole dif branch. I believe lusitanian language was one of those original bell beaker IE languages.
The Romans conquored the lusitanians fairly easily, so much so that they assimilated their language completely. The Vasconians, the ancestors of the Basques, on the other hand they took the longest to conqueor. The Basques are the only people of Iberia to not be assimilated completely as they still have their language.
Native american DNA?
You're doing a good work.Can you make one on romanians? I know we are mostly neolitic farmers(45-50 procent) western hunter-gatherers(30 procent) and indo-europeans, yamnaya ( 20-25 procent).Thanks
Nothing wrong with nationalism. Diversity, OTOH, results in higher crime rates, lower civic engagement, less social trust, and politicians who exploit racial differences to divide and conquer. Good fences, as they say, create good neighbors.
Multiracial societies are artificial and have to be artificially maintained through a police state.
Amazing, my friend; commendable done. We greatly appreciate the valuable information that you always offer us with.
Greetings
I’ve seen videos of what do Spanish people look like. Most of them have Anatolian features similar to Turkish people.
Turks are not from Turkey they are way from East Asia
@@julybeeb4614 Modern day Turks largely descend from people who were already living in Anatolia (such as Greeks, Armenians and other Indo-European people) BEFORE the arrival of Seljuk Turks, there was never a population replacement. Seljuk Turks (who were a powerful minority) mixed with local Anatolians. The local population of Anatalia was simply Turkified and that is precisely why modern day Turks look nothing like Kazakhs, for example.
@@Ogeroigres seljuk are half east Iranian
Modern anatolians are heavily armenoid admixed so not really. If anything, iberians (as well as all west meds, especially the sardinians) most closely resemble the ancient neolithic anatolians (ANF).
@@cmt160
Sardinia..
Only.
Iberia especially Portuguese have 15%
Nord African DNA
Italy have 28% Caucasus dna
Según 23andme yo soy 100% ibérico
Y mucha gente segun los resultados que yo he visto en el país no tiene nada de norteafricano.
Sin embargo veo decenas de norteafricanos que llegan a tener 25% de iberico...😮
Están mal y no son precisos los test de adn que se toman la mayoria de norteafricanos (los resultados comerciales de myheritage son basura, ni caso). Si se tomasen 23andme como tú anotarían 100% norteafricano. Y si su te tomases el test de myheritage que es muy impreciso anotarías algo de norteafricano probablemente, lo mismo que ellos anotan algo de ibérico. No sé si me entiendes. Está fatal y cuentan ancestria muy antigua como si fuese moderna.
Cuando los Moros fueron espulsados del Norte de España llevaron consigo adn Iberico, además de que los Bereberes de Marruecos parecen tener mezcla Iberica
@@cmt160 hubo flujo genético en ambas direcciones
@@user-yt3xd2jl6dsi, y en el resultado comercial de 23andme está incluido en los porcentajes de o bien “spanish&portuguese” o de “north african”, ya que te muestra la ancestria reciente y no la antigua
@@cmt160 los de la expulsión de los Moros ocurrió hace solo 500 años, periodo de tiempo en el que los test se consideran válidos
I have Celtic & Germanic (maternal side), Middle Eastern & South Asian (paternal side) ancestries. What DNA test/s (company/ies) would you recommend for me?
ancestry is the best hands down
Do Tunisia next
SPANISH. SPAIN
May only land love
I belong to this country 😘😍
Spanish blood
JHOHANESS GJEWSCEFPH VARGAS 😁😊😉
Informative video. I was told that the term 'Iberia' is derived or associated w/ 'Hebrew', and that there is a Hebrew mixture of genetics among Spaniards as well. Do you have information on this?
Thank you.
You might be thinking of Sephardic Jews.
That's likely - Thanks. And is there a significant genetic mixture among the Spanish? @@ramonacosta2647
Sefarad means spain in landino. The name Iberia comes from a river
@@juliegautreaux4087 The name Iberia comes from the greeks, genius
The name Iberia comes from a river, and that is how it was called by the Greeks. There also lived on the peninsula a people called Iberians... something that everyone who has read a little knows perfectly well.
What about phénicien and carthagia befor celte and vandales.and why you ignore eastern Origines of Iberia
He talked about Anatolian farmers which are half of Spanish DNA
They left little legacy, the punics (carthaginians/phoenician). I don’t deny it, im myself from the region they left the most legacy both archeological and genetical but i think the latter is 98% due to the romans and the later imperial migrations, rather than because of the Punics themselves.
They left little to no genetical legacy.
😂😂😂
wait youre telling that Spanish people are not from Mexico?
amerimutt.jpg
Pero qué broma es esta……. Estás hablando en serio….😳 😮😢
Es broma. Aqui en EEUU, muchos Americanos blancos quizás no muy educados cren que todos los hispanohablantes son Méxicanos.
@@egutiguti3337, no, es el típico troll.
Spanish look like lebanon and sirians
Anatolian neolithic farmer heritage, maybe influence of Phonecians too. But northern Spaniards look nothing like Lebanese or Syrians.
I live in Spain and know many Lebanese people in Australia. They are rather distinct phenotypically to eastern meds. A misconception is that Spaniards resemble other Mediterraneans like Italians and Greeks who for the most part share some similarities with Eastern Mediterraneans. The Spaniards however, with their additional WHG ancestry are more like the southern French and northern Italians, with a distinct Celtic admixture profile.
In reality, Spaniards and Portuguese have very little Middle Eastern DNA. Italy and Greece have way more, for example. Just because they tend to have dark hair and brown eyes, doesn't mean they look Middle Eastern.
there is some overlap due to high Anatolian farmer in both population but still for the most part even the Dark Spaniards/Iberian still look more " western " than eastern due to higher WHG and higher steppe ancestry for example
typical dark Spaniards
live.staticflickr.com/8424/7757560928_ae94f6ec88.jpg
typical Eastern med Levantine
sernooa.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/0FACC5E4-E63B-4466-948B-5FBF92CDD971.jpeg
@@Ogeroigres Portuguese are darkest.
As Indian
Spain Italy greek look white for us
Did all Indo-Europeans have modelling contracts? The illustrations remind me of Nazi ideal representations of Aryans.
They did certainly look better than your average modern human because they were less or not degenerated at all due to bad nutrition. But that goes for all ancient human groups really, not just the Indoeuropeans/aryans. I bet even the farmers looked more like “models” than modern people on average.
@@cmt160 Bollocks! They had the same share of unattractive people as anyone else and probably a lot more scarring and deformities than we have today.
@@cmt160if anything we look better than those ancient populations. Average indi-european was like 5’8 meanwhile average farmer was like 5’3
Interesting. I recently found out that i am part iberian/basque (and slightly African). We always thought we were "native american" on that side. some of our relatives had darker skin and we were told we were native american.
Yes! One can easily see the mulatto look of you, by way of your features.
My family is of Andalusian origin, from Granada and Malaga, but before that from the Arabian Peninsula, and because 300 years ago in Libya, we have relatives with the same surnames in Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia, the Levant, and the Arabian Peninsula, and through genetic testing in Spain. Im on A-l419
No Arabs 😂😂