Funny how they managed to ignore all the problems of H2, like: energy density transportation compression infrastructure. H2 is not the magic bullet for global warming, it's the magic bullet for persuading the gullible that they're doing something.
Not fantastic, instead of ending our reliance on fossil fuels and the climate change issue you helped cause, Shell, your trying to do business as usual with better PR spin. Your company is an embarrassment to mankind
"Clear" hydrogen production cost by Proton Technology, Inc in Canada is equivalent to $0.25 per KG or $0.25 per gasoline gallon sounds market driven especially recycling abandoned oil wells on land or off-shore.
Might as well invest carbon capture and save the I.C.E. there's a estimated 1.4 billion I.C.E's on the road are people really expected to buy whole new vehicles?
but it isn't! It is a waste of energy, 95% of the worlds Hydrogen is black, made through Steam Methane Reforming, producing 11 kg of CO2 for every 1 kg produced Hydrogen
Which is exactly what it's supposed to do. But check out how much Shell is devoting to H2. check out how "clean" clean H2 really is and then you can add some more checks, like: energy density transportation compression infrastructure. This is what corruption looks like, mate. Steel is one of the biggest players in the world's most corrupt industries. That's not me saying it, it's the UN's own, specially chosen raporteur into world corruption.
How much is your soul worth? How much the plane? Aren't you already a successful RUclipsr? Do you NEED to destroy the planet? Is it some sort of unexplained urge? How much did Shell pay you for this? Because, however much you were paid, it was never enough and it was never going to be enough. Isn't it funny that you start the video with a quote from the IEA saying that "low carbon hydrogen should account for more than 50% of world hydrogen production"? Yet you also completely ignore the IEA's point that hydrogen, at best, will account for 20% of world energy by 2050. And you also conveniently ignore the fact that the supposedly "low carbon" hydrogen from gas is, in fact, nothing of the sort. The only verifiable report that I have seen on this mythical "low carbon" hydrogen from natural gas is absolutely just as bad for climate change as any other form of hydrogen production. I hope that you're embarrassed.
@@mrfishsticks266 Go on then, tell me how much oil is used by an EV over the life of the vehicle. Actually, don't bother. I can tell you. About 50% of a BEV is made up of plastics from petrochemicals, which is pretty much exactly the same as for an ICE. So what? And then you've got the consumables: tyres, lubricants etc. What? ICEs don't use tyres or lubricants? ICEs don't use fuel? No matter, of course, that BEV makers are working hard at including recycled plastics at every turn, tr than the industry is working very hard at finding alternatives to fossil fuel-derived plastics. None of that matters to you, because you are quite happy for the planet to burn, so long as you can continue to drive your gas guzzler. Because, no matter what your ICE, it still guzzles gas, is made of gas and it will still contribute to the global warming that we're all suffering.
Hydrogen is the Swiss Army Knife of Fuels. It can do many tasks, but is not the tool you reach for when you have options.
Underrated comment
Shell a gas company is thinking about non gas method to power cars. Brilliant
The safety aspect has not been shown in this video, how safe is Hydrogen, one hears of Hydrogen cell accidents.
Fantastic video - making H2 and it's potential really easy to understand in an engaging format
Thank you, Iris, and you can find out more here: go.shell.com/3LCficc
Funny how they managed to ignore all the problems of H2, like:
energy density
transportation
compression
infrastructure.
H2 is not the magic bullet for global warming, it's the magic bullet for persuading the gullible that they're doing something.
Not fantastic, instead of ending our reliance on fossil fuels and the climate change issue you helped cause, Shell, your trying to do business as usual with better PR spin. Your company is an embarrassment to mankind
hellow gourgeous
Can't believe I'm liking a SHELL oil cartel video
hydrogen is a byproduct when you make plastic from petroleum
@@yen-minglutetium6163 but that byproduct isn't sustainable. Most hydrogen isn't.
@@bbennett3898 that's why ppl say hydrogen is future. Money talks
Nice … but … only 4% of commercial Hydrogen production comes from electrolysis. The rest comes from Gas, Coal and other Carbon fuels?! Explain that!
So the only people that can make new fuel is fuel companies. I know dam well if this was made by someone else they would have done something to it
"Clear" hydrogen production cost by Proton Technology, Inc in Canada is equivalent to $0.25 per KG or $0.25 per gasoline gallon sounds market driven especially recycling abandoned oil wells on land or off-shore.
Most hydrogen is produced from oil
Wow! I'm really wowed and excited by how Shell is leading on environmental sustainability fronts.
😂 ok paid commenter, very believable
Might as well invest carbon capture and save the I.C.E. there's a estimated 1.4 billion I.C.E's on the road are people really expected to buy whole new vehicles?
Why not? They already do so approx. every 2 years on average.
It certainly sounds far better than the electric option 👍
but it isn't! It is a waste of energy, 95% of the worlds Hydrogen is black, made through Steam Methane Reforming, producing 11 kg of CO2 for every 1 kg produced Hydrogen
LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL 😂😂😂😂😂
Nice joke
Which is exactly what it's supposed to do.
But
check out how much Shell is devoting to H2.
check out how "clean" clean H2 really is
and then you can add some more checks, like:
energy density
transportation
compression
infrastructure.
This is what corruption looks like, mate. Steel is one of the biggest players in the world's most corrupt industries. That's not me saying it, it's the UN's own, specially chosen raporteur into world corruption.
Here's an idea just use rechargeable batteries instead 😂
very good.
Jaquea Lamb comment allez
Rocket on 4 wheels
How much is your soul worth? How much the plane?
Aren't you already a successful RUclipsr? Do you NEED to destroy the planet? Is it some sort of unexplained urge?
How much did Shell pay you for this?
Because, however much you were paid, it was never enough and it was never going to be enough.
Isn't it funny that you start the video with a quote from the IEA saying that "low carbon hydrogen should account for more than 50% of world hydrogen production"?
Yet you also completely ignore the IEA's point that hydrogen, at best, will account for 20% of world energy by 2050.
And you also conveniently ignore the fact that the supposedly "low carbon" hydrogen from gas is, in fact, nothing of the sort. The only verifiable report that I have seen on this mythical "low carbon" hydrogen from natural gas is absolutely just as bad for climate change as any other form of hydrogen production.
I hope that you're embarrassed.
Disappointing excuse to avoid reducing reliance on oil, by making hydrogen from oil.
🤡
Tha counts to ev too
@@mrfishsticks266 Go on then, tell me how much oil is used by an EV over the life of the vehicle.
Actually, don't bother. I can tell you.
About 50% of a BEV is made up of plastics from petrochemicals, which is pretty much exactly the same as for an ICE. So what?
And then you've got the consumables: tyres, lubricants etc.
What? ICEs don't use tyres or lubricants?
ICEs don't use fuel?
No matter, of course, that BEV makers are working hard at including recycled plastics at every turn, tr than the industry is working very hard at finding alternatives to fossil fuel-derived plastics.
None of that matters to you, because you are quite happy for the planet to burn, so long as you can continue to drive your gas guzzler. Because, no matter what your ICE, it still guzzles gas, is made of gas and it will still contribute to the global warming that we're all suffering.
R1 Dris Khail HiR
Seems gucci
Short no