Father Francisco Radecki: Modernist Infiltration of the Church

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 23 дек 2024

Комментарии • 70

  • @DT-cz2sl
    @DT-cz2sl Год назад +32

    This is my Pope. Dear Pope Pius XII. I doubt you need it, but if you do. May God grant you eternal rest. Please pray for us. We really need it

    • @MadMax31577
      @MadMax31577 11 месяцев назад

      The angelic pastor

  • @jamesreichle7802
    @jamesreichle7802 Год назад +14

    I grew up under this Pope ,my family and I all revered and loved this Truly Great Pope Pius Xll.

  • @RapidCycling07
    @RapidCycling07 Год назад +16

    Incredible video brother in Christ! Thank you for sharing! I pray that God will provide us with a holy Pope to end this interregnum and to restore order.

  • @E.C.2
    @E.C.2 Год назад +5

    Happy Gaudete Sunday. Love y'all.

  • @MrDWCallahan
    @MrDWCallahan Год назад +3

    Thanks for this useful information. God Bless

  • @JohnSnow-jt4lm
    @JohnSnow-jt4lm Год назад +3

    The just shall live by faith

  • @aaronmeehan4324
    @aaronmeehan4324 Год назад +6

    Lord help us

  • @richardneagle1059
    @richardneagle1059 Год назад +5

    " And the church will be full of those who accept compromise "

  • @loulasher
    @loulasher Год назад +4

    Around 5:19 when he equates SSPX to protestants and modernists because they pic and choose how they worship and what "papal" direction they accept (I'm paraphrasing): is that a fair assessment of their practices and how they arrived at them? Is it more based on choices they made since Lefevre's passing than on what they set out to do? I'm really asking.
    In the long run I'm more interested in the cure (which I, & I guess we all, think will have a supernatural cause), for the disease that the Church itself knew was coming, than in nitpicking over when the disease was first diagnosable (that would be in the scriptures themselves, not the 1800s or 1950s or 1960s) and which maladies are rightfully part of the disease (they all are).

    • @anng.4542
      @anng.4542 Год назад +5

      No, I believe this speaker mischaracterizes the SSPX. The SSPX retains traditional Catholic beliefs. Archnishop Lefebre did not invent new ones. It is the modernists who "pick and choose" which elements of Catholic doctrine and dogma to retain.
      And learning history and historical trends is not "nitpicking".

    • @loulasher
      @loulasher Год назад +2

      ​@@anng.4542​@anng.4542 The nitpicking I refer to is over classifications if the problems and over when they started because I think it misses bigger points that could unify a stronger (for lack of a better term) "counter-concilar" Church (akin to counter-reformation) that can shine Christ's light into a world darkened by all the forces he talks about in the resr if the video. If I can make a bad analogy, it's like I'm more interested in the army we form after boot camp than what made us enlist. Maybe I'm naive.

    • @heleneminger
      @heleneminger Год назад +9

      Do the SSPX say Francis is the Pope? If they do they owe him obedience. The church is not supposed to be a buffet you can't just pick what you like and leave the undesirable behind.

    • @E.C.2
      @E.C.2 Год назад +6

      Pray for traditional Catholic unity,many of us are utterly sick of the divisions. What matters is the Faith,living it daily,valid Holy Mass/Sacraments,etc our opinions should be discussions but none of us have authority or jurisdiction to declare anyone wrong or outside the Church.

    • @loulasher
      @loulasher Год назад +6

      @@heleneminger obedience to a person is not a thing, because we can only obey things like instructions. Noone owes obedience to error or to instructions that are inscrutible or ambiguous. I doubt anyone in the SSPX would characterize themsleves as disobedient to the Church, nor to any truth taught by the Church, nor to right worship as developed by the Church over centuries. So, say something specific instead of empty generalities that are not even accusations.

  • @almeggs3247
    @almeggs3247 Год назад +1

    Amen amen Amen 🙏 🙏🙏

  • @MKUltraPangolin
    @MKUltraPangolin Год назад +4

    Where can we get the book? I want to share with my R&R and NO family members.

    • @calebkennon2527
      @calebkennon2527 Год назад

      Same

    • @semperteamabo99
      @semperteamabo99 Год назад

      I think this is the book he is referring to... google: Mary Immaculate Queen center Vatican II Exposed as Counterfeit Catholicism: Radecki
      (there is an abridged version for $21-395 pages, and full version $50 -809 pages)

    • @CatholicMailman
      @CatholicMailman 10 месяцев назад

      What is R&R?

  • @katemcpherson4146
    @katemcpherson4146 Год назад +4

    🙏

  • @SusanTrelease
    @SusanTrelease Год назад +22

    Communism is the same as Freemasonry/Illuminism. Both of these are the same as Talmudic Judaism, which is carried on by the Jews, who call themselves the "spiritual Heirs" of the Pharisees who crucified Christ. The writings of the Jews themselves will confirm this. Judaism is the opposite of Catholicism and does not follow the Old Testament religion. Their holy books are the 40 volume set of commentary and beliefs of the rabbis, along with the cabbala and other very non-holy books.

    • @DonnaLeeOneal
      @DonnaLeeOneal Год назад +10

      That is stuff I didn't know. Thank you

    • @stephencockett9959
      @stephencockett9959 Год назад +1

      Well said. The insidious enemy and battle that we face today - all emanate from the satanic demands of talmuudic supremacism.

    • @clarekuehn4372
      @clarekuehn4372 Год назад +9

      @@DonnaLeeOneal 3-volume book on it: The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit. The author is a conservative Novus Ordo Catholic, but an historian.

    • @E.C.2
      @E.C.2 Год назад +4

      He didn't discuss Pius XII promoting +Montini to Patriarch of Milan. Pope Pius XI was Patriarch of Milan before being being elected Pope,it was an extremely high profile Office. I will,in the foreseeable future,never agree with the restored Holy Week but that's another story.

    • @stephencockett9959
      @stephencockett9959 Год назад +1

      @@clarekuehn4372 see if you can find the copy on-line of:
      'The Plot Against the Church' 1962. By Maurice Pinay.
      For the proper version search:
      Holywar pinay plot against the church.

  • @NothosXXI
    @NothosXXI Год назад +5

    Amazing summary!!
    I'm commenting that the Society of St. Pius X does not oppose the Pope, nor is Schismtic like some mistakenly assume. Besides, per _Quo Primum_ , the Society should be protected and is protected from saying any other Mass other than the liturgy canonized in the Roman Curia after Trent...

  • @edwardbaker1331
    @edwardbaker1331 Год назад +2

    The real definition of atheism the belief that truth changes. This applies even if you delude yourself that you do believe in God. Truth, because it is entirely the reflection of the mind of God, never changes. His creation creates no truth at all. Pride is the root of sin, the belief that we can create truth. "You shall be as Gods." We can be creative in witnessing truth, and discovering truth about the physical universe, but we create no truth at all. We don't even possess truth. Truth possesses us. The primordial temptation of creating "new truth" is at the root of heresy.

  • @almeggs3247
    @almeggs3247 Год назад +5

    But I know as a fact that the Eucharist was valid for me because my intention for my deceased Lutheran father was physically answered! Of course I did NOT blaspheme by receiving our Lord in my hands but on the tongue!

    • @fr.timothygeckle1119
      @fr.timothygeckle1119 Год назад +4

      God no doubt saw your intention and answered your prayer, but that doesn't mean that it was through an invalid sacrament.

  • @lightowl4345
    @lightowl4345 Год назад +1

    What is the name of the book they are publishing?

    • @semperteamabo99
      @semperteamabo99 Год назад +1

      I think this is the book he is referring to... google: Mary Immaculate Queen center Vatican II Exposed as Counterfeit Catholicism: Radecki
      (there is an abridged version for $21-395 pages, and full version $50 -809 pages)

  • @jeannenollen4492
    @jeannenollen4492 Год назад +1

    Is this a Pious the fifth group?

  • @aseeker2109
    @aseeker2109 Год назад +2

    11:15
    church it's based on humanism the human person that if you read John Paul II's
    11:21
    writing his whole life is based on humanism it never goes beyond to a
    11:27
    higher level and naturalism then everything's on a natural level.
    Your statement above is not true...

  • @Bouboukenka
    @Bouboukenka 8 месяцев назад

    What book does he refer to?

  • @bohmao
    @bohmao Год назад

    What's the name of the book he's talking about?

    • @semperteamabo99
      @semperteamabo99 Год назад

      This might be the book he is referring to... google: Mary Immaculate Queen center Vatican II Exposed as Counterfeit Catholicism: Radecki
      (there is an abridged version for $21-395 pages, and full version $50 -809 pages)

    • @bohmao
      @bohmao Год назад

      Thank you 😀@@semperteamabo99

  • @LJB456
    @LJB456 Год назад +4

    The comment about the Society of St Pius X is wrong. They don’t “pick and choose “ . They reject Vatican 2 and the Novus Ordo and that is it.

    • @RapidCycling07-p5v
      @RapidCycling07-p5v Месяц назад

      The SSPX believe that a non Catholic man can be the Pope of the Catholic Church. They seek unity with the Novus Ordo sect since they believe that it is is the Catholic Church; can’t have a non Catholic Catholic Church. They refuse submission to the man they believe is the Pope and refuse to fully accept Vatican 2; this rebellious behavior is unofficially heretical and schismatic (it’s not officially schismatic since there currently isn’t a Pope to be separated from and Vatican 2 is not a councIl of the Catholic Church, but is part of the Novus Ordo religion that the SSPX are seeking unity with). The SSPX need to reject all of Satan’s evil works and stop living a false Catholic life by seeking unity with this false Satanic religion which was purposely created to destroy the faith of Catholics and to create the future mandated One World Religion of the AntiChrist (Catholicism will be outlawed and Catholics will be hunted down and eliminated). Viva Cristo Rey!

  • @JamesTaylor-yh9rl
    @JamesTaylor-yh9rl Год назад +1

    The usual Pius XII myrhs. Who hired Hannibal Bugnini? It wasn't John XXIII. Why did Pius XII found the Citadella in Assisi in 1939 for the coming together of the world's religions which later staged the "World Day of Peace"?
    Read Mary Ball Martinez' "The Undermining of the Catholic Church" for the answer

  • @joachim847
    @joachim847 6 месяцев назад

    * Cran - mer

  • @rickshelley1287
    @rickshelley1287 Год назад

    If the Church splits, who gets Rome---- the conservatives or the liberals? Europe is very liberal. Perhaps the liberals should keep Rome. Africa is very conservative. Perhaps a new Church should be established in Africa.

  • @JohnSnow-jt4lm
    @JohnSnow-jt4lm Год назад +1

    Get back to the Bible

    • @timfronimos459
      @timfronimos459 Год назад +6

      Yes, and always remember to thank Catholic bishops who, under the guidance of the Holy Spirit, determined the canon of Sacred Scripture.
      Christ founded a church not a Bible.

  • @EricTheReddish-Gray
    @EricTheReddish-Gray Год назад

    "Modernists" are tolerant and loving, and that's what Jesus wanted.

    • @pati8278
      @pati8278 11 месяцев назад +3

      False teachings are against Christ Himself.

    • @lorichet
      @lorichet 11 месяцев назад +2

      Modernists are tolerant all right -- tolerant of sin.
      What they're not tolerant of are Catholics who believe in being obedient to God's laws.

    • @judistench2167
      @judistench2167 6 месяцев назад +2

      Jesus Christ taught that we are to be INtolerant of both sin and any kind of evil.
      ‘Modernism’ is the synthesis of all heresies against Jesus Christ and His One True Church.

  • @atjh9641
    @atjh9641 4 месяца назад

    You talk too fast, Father, especially with the names you cite. Interesting but disappointing delivery .

  • @clarekuehn4372
    @clarekuehn4372 Год назад +5

    @catholicfamilypodcast5501 To what book of his is he referring???🤷‍♀️
    & Freemasonry did not start in 1717. They just formally reorganized and publicized a new public recognition of it in that year, as a memorial of Luther's 1517 act. They were called Freemasonry in the 1600s as well, for the same ideas: lodges in London and North America, working also with Charles II and science of Newton, etc., to "rebuild Jew temple" mixed with John Dee's magic from the 1500s.