Computational Thinking is thinking in a way that solving a problem can be simplify just to inputs and outputs. You decide how to represent them, preferably in the more simple way (Like using binary code in the case of unicode or RGB). Between inputs and outputs are algorithms. They works best as higher level of abstraction you are working. Those are going to reach to the output. That's my main note of the class. If I made some kind of mistake, correct me. If you have something to contribute, do it. Saludos desde Perú
People who say tearing a book is bad because it has information. C'mon, it's a effin phonebook! The information it contains is possibly extremely reduntant for modern standards and it's already a waste of paper. The paper would be put much better use if it were to be recycled.
He's David Malan, a force of nature in computer science teaching; and here's a July 21, 2020 New Yorker article about his work making Harvard's CS50 course available to and replicable by all: www.newyorker.com/news/our-local-correspondents/how-harvards-star-computer-science-professor-built-a-distance-learning-empire
@@Itsme-pp9bd as someone mentioned above, the content and the way they're speaking is targeted towards a bit mature audience. Regular CS50 is like targeted towards teens who just entered college more or less. Overall yes it's the same but how u cater different audiences matters
the best lecturer in the internet.
Hey, are you a lawyer?
Computational Thinking is thinking in a way that solving a problem can be simplify just to inputs and outputs. You decide how to represent them, preferably in the more simple way (Like using binary code in the case of unicode or RGB). Between inputs and outputs are algorithms. They works best as higher level of abstraction you are working. Those are going to reach to the output.
That's my main note of the class. If I made some kind of mistake, correct me. If you have something to contribute, do it.
Saludos desde Perú
I understand him better than my high school teacher.
21:55 here I realized he is taking break also . I was thinking that how could he speak for a hour. But that's pro level editing
Litterally nobody:
David Malan: WELL IT TURNS OUT
Ok, new profession - legal engineer.
Thank you very much for your wonderful lecture sir!
I'm a Law student and learning Python + Digital Marketing.
Motivational
People who say tearing a book is bad because it has information. C'mon, it's a effin phonebook! The information it contains is possibly extremely reduntant for modern standards and it's already a waste of paper. The paper would be put much better use if it were to be recycled.
Nice...
Who is that guy? He's great.
Who is THAT guy? Who are YOU?
David Malan
He's David Malan, a force of nature in computer science teaching; and here's a July 21, 2020 New Yorker article about his work making Harvard's CS50 course available to and replicable by all: www.newyorker.com/news/our-local-correspondents/how-harvards-star-computer-science-professor-built-a-distance-learning-empire
No curso, eu entendi que haveria uma atividade para cada vídeo. Alguém pode me indicar onde encontro? Obrigada! 🤔
See cs50.harvard.edu/law/2019/!
Esta na plataforma harvardX
04:49 lmao
Is this the entire project?
Is this the entire course?
I have a question about the "big-oh" notation.
What if the lecturer IS Mike Smith!
brazilian here
Isn’t this the normal CS50 🤔🤔😂😂😂
lamia bagouri but more fancy 😂
The tie changed everything for me📈
insomnia can you please clarify ? Till now i see it's not relevant to legal area
@@Itsme-pp9bd yes it's the same but the target audience is difference so that's why the setup is a bit difference nothing else
@@Itsme-pp9bd as someone mentioned above, the content and the way they're speaking is targeted towards a bit mature audience. Regular CS50 is like targeted towards teens who just entered college more or less. Overall yes it's the same but how u cater different audiences matters
16:10 ASCII a stupid question, get a stupid ANSI . . .
please don't waste paper.
good lecture but i apologise to say...bad behavior don,t tear the book that because we are digitalized people
Its just an old phonebook.