4:4:4 vs. 4:2:2 vs. 4:2:0
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 27 авг 2024
- What's the difference between 420, 422, and 444? What does 4:2:0, 4:2:2, and 4:4:4 mean? Do I need 420, 422, or 444 on my camera? Find all your answers here!
Get featured in videos, vote on what videos I should make next, or be the first to know about what will drop next at Patreon for $1/day or less! www.patreon.co...
Affiliate Links:
If you want to try a free trial of the animation software I use, check it out here: vyond.grsm.io/...
When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, Vyond.
Feel free to check out my business website: www.magnumvp.com
or contact me at caleb@magnumvp.com
The unique luminance factor was really insightful. Also appreciated the realistic example of the green screen rather than having eight wildly different pixels in the pallet.
That was insanely well explained. Thanks so much for sharing this knowledge
My pleasure. Really glad this was helpful. Thanks so much for saying so.
I never understood this before. I just assumed the higher the #s the better. But bigger isn't always better. The visual animations were soooooo helpful. Great job barking up another helpful video.
Thank you. Yes, same here. It definitely is better when it comes to bit rate, but not as important with chromatic subsampling.
Great Video!!! WoW you are nice, direct and straight in to the point without and flubber and you got the educational part DIALED IN FAST = THANK YOU
Thank you so much! That's exactly what I'm trying to do. Glad it was such a help. Really appreciate your encouragement.
@@ginger_dog it's good stuff. No fluff. No endless BS. Very informative.
This video is by far the best explanation on the color encoding that I've seen. Thank you!!
Thank you so much for the feedback! I'm so glad this was really helpful to you.
Finally someone who explains things clearly in a way even I can understand. Cheers
Aww, so glad this was helpful. Thanks for saying so.
Nicely summarized. Thanks for this.
You're welcome. Glad it was helpful.
Best video I've seen on the topic so far, well done.
Shucks, thank you so much.
I’ve always been so confused by this concept but you made that so plain and simple! Thank you!!
Good to know it’s useful for green screen!
My pleasure! Glad it was helpful. I was confused for a while myself.
Dude thank you. This was driving me insane. 4:2:2 for green screen work. 4:2:0 for everything else.
Video in 4:2:2 won't play on my phone. But video in 4:2:0 will. Strange but at least I know the difference!
Awesome! So glad it was helpful.
I did not expect such a great explanation on this topic from a man talking to me in ungraded log profile! Very helpful.
Bwahaha! Touche! What can I say: the best barber has the worst haircut, the best mechanic the worst sounding car.... Glad you found it helpful. Thanks for saying so.
Jeez, never saw 6 mins fly by this fast - great explanation !
Ha ha! That's honestly a huge compliment. Thank you so much. Glad it was helpful.
Well done sir, this is easily the best explanation I have ever seen on this topic. Brilliant video, thank you.
Ao glad this was helpful. Thank you for saying so.
Great explanation, thank you!
Glad it was helpful to you. Thanks for saying so.
This is as clear as any example I've seen, and far better samples of each displayed, too.
Thank you Bill for that encouragement. So glad this was helpful.
Fascinating! Very helpful. Thanks for this video!
This was very helpful!
So glad. Thanks for saying so.
This video is great and, as other people commented, goes straight to the point. Good job!
Thank you so much. I really appreciate the feedback and I'm glad this was helpful.
Great explination, I have been trying to wrap my mind around this and now I have a much better mental model.
Excellent! I'm so glad I was able to help. Thank you for saying so. It was pretty confusing for me too when I first heard about it.
Your video was very helpful, thanks!
So glad. Thanks for saying so.
tip put your voice audio on mono... your voice is mainly on the left channel. over all thx for the info :)
Thank you. Yes, I've changed audio methods a lot since that recording. I appreciate it though.
That was a great video, thanks! Edit: and love you handle, that's hilarious😀
Ha ha. Thank you so much. I appreciate it. Glad the video was helpful.
This was really helpful, thanks!
I'm so glad. Thanks for saying so.
Excellent !
Thank you so much. Glad it was helpful for you.
Nice video mate!
Thanks for explaining
Hey, my pleasure. Glad it was helpful.
Thank you so much!
Absolutely! Glad it was helpful to you.
Great explaining!!! 👍 keep on!!!
Thanks!
Thank you so much. I'm glad this was helpful.
Very well presented !
Now what I'm wondering, is on my Lumix S5 IIX, after deeper comparison of REC formats/codecs, I noticed the 4:2:2 formats used the H.264 codec, while the 4:2:0 used H.265 . At same bitrate of c.
Thus, would there be yet another benefit in such case, to prefer 4:2:0 over 4:2:2 , regarding the overall quality of the footage, considering the better codec efficiency ? As long as the 4:2:2 added chroma info isn't needed for specific use cases (but even regarding that, if the quality is higher at same bitrate, it could also help with auto detouring etc?)
Thanks
You ask a very intelligent and nuanced question. As you hinted at the end of your question, I think it really depends on use case. If you are keying anything out or doing any kind of more intense color grading beyond a simple LUT, I would go with the 4:2:2. If the 4:2:0 yields smaller file sizes and is easier to edit and you don't need to do too much with the colors in post, then totally go that route. I know certain computers and editing platforms handle H.265 and H.264 differently. If you haven't noticed a problem with the H.265 and it is smaller and easier to work with, go for it. There's no point in recording more if you aren't going to use it. To me, it all comes down to use case and post production workflow. Hope that helps. Thanks again for asking.
good stufffffffffff thank you!
So glad this was helpful for you. Thanks for saying so.
I'm trying to figure out why Moonlight streaming looks so much better than Parsec, and I think this may be it. Its a night and day difference even on SDR content, (HDR doesn't even work in Parsec) Parsec looks dull with greyish blacks, running parsec seems to reduce the quality of my entire display client and host, while moonlight seems to enhance it. It also appears 4:4:4 will greatly increase the bandwidth requirements.
Hmm... very interesting. I don't have experience in those, so I can't say for certain, but you may be onto something.
@@ginger_dog I have noticed something else, certain types of games look amazing in parsec, and most other games look washed out, blacks are not really black... I just find it odd that the display is radically different when streaming depending on what you are streaming. It seems games that have less colors look really good, and games with complicated color palettes look like crap
@@ginger_dog what I'm getting at, is I believe the color palette makes a huge difference. In Resident Evil 3, when I switched to the rec 709 color palette, it looks considerably better. Perhaps there is some windows level setting I can alter the display output with. I have attempted to upgrade my parsec account to 444. I'm having technical issues on that front if I do get that working, I will let you know if that was in fact the issue
@@kyledupont7711 Sweet! Best of luck.
well done
Thank you so much. Glad it was helpful.
What's the difference, in video, between chroma and luma?
Luma has to do with the luminance or the lightness/darkness (the gray scale, if you will) of the color. Chroma is the color information itself.
@@ginger_dog Thanks!
Let me ask you, when I'm rendering animations to put back into Premiere Pro. Should I do ProRess 422 or ProRes 422 LT?
Well, obviously the LT version is going to be slightly lower quality but save you a lot on file size. If your end video is going on social media or RUclips, the LT version probably makes the most sense. If you are scaling way into the animation, keying out the background of tiny shapes, or distributing on Netflix or theaters, then go with the 422. 89 cases out of 100, the LT is probably going to be more than enough.
@@ginger_dog Ok, thank you for this. I will stick to 422 then, as I am rotoscoping and doing intense animation zooms. The end result is for social media but my animations are no longer than 10 seconds at most.
@@johnalmighty You could always experiment on the most extreme example and see if you notice a difference. Identify the file size difference and pixel peep as much as you possibly can and see what is more worthwhile to do.
Movie RGB or YCBCR?
Most digital is YCBCR.
Is this effect fps?
No, this shouldn't affect FPS at all.
@@ginger_dog thanks
Gaming 444 or 422 ?
Gaming, I don't know. My only area of experience is videography.
@@ginger_dog when I activate 444 the colors look Sharp but the content loses sharpness. at 422 the content looks sharp but the color not so much and it looks dim at 444.
@@mauromanueljb9044 Interesting. I hope gamers see this and comment with more experience.
@@ginger_dog 👍
Personally im on a 240hz panel and i felt like the response time was faster on 422 so thats what i use
Engineers*
Thank you! I did not know this (you learn something new everyday huh)!
Absolutely! Glad it was helpful.
Dude, you've just won the prize for the most fried vocal!
Ha ha! Totally.