Atleast the playerbase is happy about it. Battlefield 2042 is just an embarrassing dead end...nobody cares about these details. The shooting animation feels childish. Even the aim accuracy is fucked up. And talking about the active player base....well, we all know how bf2042 holds up. Just a dead game... pretending to be alive. Lol.
Been playing 2042 since launch. It was rough when it came out but I could see that eventually it would be fantastic and I'm glad I was right. It's very underrated now and definitely worth picking up. Super fun, lots to unlock and piss about with. Back to how it should be. My favourite battlefield since bf4 for sure.
@@panzershrek7942 True but how long are people gonna keep saying that? Games much much better now so enjoy it in the state it’s in, launch was a whole 2 years ago now 🤦♂️
Always trust DICE. I told everyone from the start 2042 would be another BF4 situation and here we are and 2042 is more than doubling CoD's player count
Even I think this was a bit skewed towards BF here. Frostbite is just too good at explosions, deformation and all other interactions between player and the world. It was built for stuff like these
Bro the video title is « Ultimate attention to detail » Ofc BF is gonna win cuz its environment is better but dont complain « its sweked » the details are just better with the environment.
This has to be one of the best detail comparison videos I've seen so far between these two games. You don't factor out anything, you don't show no BS, just the best of both games. And I got to say, battlefield wins by a landslide easily. The only things MW3 are better at are swimming and reload animations. I think both games are fun (imo battlefield is a lot more fun), but battlefield definitely wins in detail. Thanks for doing such a great job on this video!
I find it weird that the trees, vegetation and smaller objects in MW3’s Ground War do not render shadows at all. It looks kinda washed out. The very static nature of CoD maps is expected but couldn’t they include something like Gta V. Like driving over street lamps and smaller trees?
For the vegetation, Im pretty sure it's because it's the beta build. There are some trees that do react to grenades, and such. There's just missing details that the final game might have. The MW2 beta also was missing details.
Bro I didn't even know like 85% of these details on BF😂 I just hop in and play that's it, but now that I've seen this video I will never complain about details knowing what I have and what other games bring to the table 👍
@@PhysicalEngineering your telling me you can say truthfully that CoD Cold War and vanguard are better games than 2042? 2042 has better gunplay/jet, tank gameplay than most other battlefield games, but bf1 abd 5 have better atmosphere.
Huge Battlefield fan and love and play all of them. The attention to detail is leagues above cod but one thing cod does right is having a variety of game modes. Multi, campaign, warzone, dmz, zombies, etc. One thing I always found Battleifield lacking in is more game mode varity. Conquest and Breakthrough get old after away. Also Cod gun mechanics and weapon customization out paces Battlefield. If the next battlefield and fix those two things it be leagues above the rest imo. Oh and delete Operators, if they wanna keep the gadgets sure but make it and equipment you can chose not an operator and just sell skins that fit different faction models like how BF5 did it.
I had the best moment in BF2042, so I have no hud on, and I get shot, but then get revived and after that I kinda stumble around seeking cover, when as soon as I’m running to my team, an enemy throws a flashbang to them, so my character gets slightly effected so his hand goes up, and as the flash is clearing, I can see my team getting picked off so I turn around and run off.
If you're on console, I'd go with 2042. The movement and gunplay in this game is pretty on par with CoD and the aim assist is not that OP. Also I personally got tired of the 6v6 style of gamemodes and their groundwars were never that hectic. The main game modes are 32v32, but if thats too much they have TDM and rush which is 16v16. Has plenty of weapons and vehicles, although it is lacking in maps ngl. Its on sale now and probably will be for the rest of its lifespan seeing as the launch was so poorly received, but the devs have made countless QoL updates that make it worth playing over CoD imo.
@@slumville1655 even MW2019 Sure they have some similarities in movement but the feels of it is not as good as MW2019 Gunplay in 2042 is different than Cod since it has bullet spread
@@slumville1655 there is spread but only at longer ranges and yes The recoil and spread are less compared to previous BF game But I still disagree The feel of the movement and gun in BF doesn't feel as good as MW2019
Battlefield graphics been looking next level since Bad Company 2. Battlefield, Crysis, & Killzone are the best looking shooting games I've ever seen, even on old consoles. COD is just now catching up
@@PrasathMGMbf2042 sucks because there was labor turnover in Dice so noobies taking over from the oldies but they don’t know what are they doing back then. I hope they will more experienced after working on the new BF project.
Not much, their goal still is to be easy to run. For bf it means higher density of assets on maps as devs have been complaining about the asset limit in 42
I give one year for people recognize BF2042 as better game, only beacouse it has bad start, but overall BF is superior game over CoD no questions about it. 😊 See you on the Battlefield !
Honestly? Yeah in 2042’s current state it wins over MW3 by a landslide. But as far as actually playing the games? Both are fun as hell. Both games have things I like more than the other. I need to redownload 2042 and give it another whirl.
Holy crap bro, what clipping/recording software do you use? The quality and frames look so smooth. Also when I export stuff from the editing software It gets compressed and the frames look horrible.
este mes compre el B 2042 y el Mw III, 100% sincero, me gusto mas el Battlefield 2042. y el nivel grafico se ve claramente superior el Battlefield 2042
I kinda have always hated Activion/Treyarch 's overuse of decals/stickers for vfx. For example, water splashes and smoke effects look better in Frostbyte because they are actual 3D models and not just an HD sticker. Notice how bullet impacts in Battlefield display smoke and the smoke has a freaking shadow. While CoD just places 2d stickers for the vfx
dunno why this is a comparison, when its common knownledge on the depths COD goes for, when it comes to details. BattleField always win this kind of thing, because its built for it, COD is just an Arena Shooter. not a massive map that can have its terrain changed by tanks and choppers.
As someone who doesn't have any AAA titles... Both games look gorgeous to me... Ofcourse battlefield has lot more details. But considering there are 2 cod games per year and 1 battlefield game per 2 years makes the difference.. one focuses more on campaign + events + BR, other focuses on Multiplayer + good destruction physics.
The thing is battlefield benefits from world destruction since it’s a massive online war simulation game and the changes players inflict on the map changes the game dynamic in many ways. However, COD is a fast paced arcade shooter with way smaller maps and having this level of destruction might actually ruin the game. Although, maybe ground war mode can benefit from some destruction. Battlefield does look great though not gonna lie.
The Sound effects are actually by sledgehammer Games since they Developed mw3, also Most of the Animations are also by sledgehammer Games except for a Few that where Copy and pasted over from mw2
Absolutely! The BF animators are more than capable of creating outstanding first-person animations, provided they are given the chance to do so without EA asking for a 3rd person Battle Royal as they did with 2042 mid-development.
@@NALOW84 they weren’t for a while after the Easter egg either but someone activated it in a game I was in very recently. Not since season 6 but it was during reduxx. Ima have to keep an eye out from now on. They should have just left it in honestly
Seriously, I don't get why COD is so afraid to implement dynamic destruction on some props like trees, fences, decors, tables, etc? I mean yes, you can't still destroy buildings, but at least make players destroy some smaller objects, to make it more... dynamic.
Also, can we talk about the sounds? In Battlefield the audio always seems grounded and has accurate reverb and atmospherics. CoD feels kinda flat in comparison. Also, why has the player character in CoD no foot step sounds?
COD has better weapon models and weapon animations. Better gun shots and better water physics. Everything literally EVERYTHING else is better in battlefield
Call duty with corny graphics 2042 is now the goat .MW3 will die soon because of the pay to win, matchmaking and allot of issues and always played COD but now the game is trash.
Well, call of duty has zombies and a few good campaigns, i like what black ops 3 did with future stuff but i feel like titanfall shouldn't have come out so call of duty could have had all that content.. but it looks like battlefield 2042 is actually good. I definitely liked battlefield 3 a lot, it would be nice to just get a remake of battlefield 3 tbh.
As owner of both games I can admit that mw 3 is much more crispier than battlefield 2042 on ps 5. Although if you have Xbox series x it might be other way around
Dude the death animations for mw3 are horrendously bad, the one thing I really really love about 2042 is the maxed out particle effects. It makes the game really beautiful. I love cod a lot but I just can’t play it anymore, it feels like something is missing every time
Is it just me or MW3 is too early for us? I mean look at the downgrades compared to the 2 previous episodes. I owned every COD games since MW2019 but this'll have to wait.
The people saying 2042 is better just from this video alone is laughable, you shouldn’t base the entire state and quality of a game based off of how many things can be destroyed. They are very different games that really only have similarities in movement and gunplay. Battlefield has always been about destruction of the environment and mass scale battles, you can argue the same for COD with ground war but it’s main focus isn’t making completely destructible environments. These types of comparisons are fun to watch, but when the person making the video explicitly compares the games based off of unfair factors, of course people will suck up to the one that has more of one specific thing. I’m not saying COD is the best thing ever or even better than 2042, but what I am saying is attention to detail isn’t the biggest factor of making a game good.
I wish battlefield would have SUPPRESSION FIRE AGAIN and no operators I love both games. *so I love battlefield but 2042 is aaaaaaaaaaah not that battlefield what I expected..
nope The style of the two games is different. You cannot compare them its normal that battlefield have almost everything in it destructible... and better environment? lets say? Call All Duty is a game focused on 5 v 5 for example? since release you barly can destroy a door lol anyway i love both games
Battlefield has always been superior in details and graphic quality, we can say the only and biggest problem for battlefield has always been executives and how poorly the franchise has been directed. Tbf, in terms of "realism" and accuracy, CoD has been way better later, specially whe it is about the campaign and weapons. Not saying that CoD campaigns are amazing, but are good and theh definetly do their research to try to be as accurate and realistic as possible (aside from post-launch content). I really do rather battlefield games, but the poor managemebt fron EA makes it really difficult to be worth its price Dont forget all the mistakes that Battlefield and EA have done even since Battlefield 4 back in 2014. It is a shame watching so much wasted potential with Frostbyte and the top quality of EA devs and engineers. They really do wonders in terms of their Engine.
Sets on himself on fire
MW3 2023: *backflips and dies*
Bf2042: *swears and feels he’s been set on fire, struggles before being cooked to death*
Battlefield deffinetly wins and is severely underrated. Nice that the devs fixed te game and added this much attention to detail.
Still bots
@@LetsFollowBuddhismdon’t matter bf is still better hands down m every way
My ass
@@LetsFollowBuddhismit's actually not and on steam had a higher 24 hour peak of players than wazone 2/mw2, but keep hating for no reason😂
@@DoggyPaws4 gta 5 still has 500 k players including all platforms
It seems like Call of Duty spent their entire budget on reload animations alone.
lol
And they're still ass
Lool
Call of Duty has budget?
Atleast the playerbase is happy about it. Battlefield 2042 is just an embarrassing dead end...nobody cares about these details.
The shooting animation feels childish. Even the aim accuracy is fucked up. And talking about the active player base....well, we all know how bf2042 holds up. Just a dead game... pretending to be alive. Lol.
We're back to Battlefield being better than Call of Duty. Nature is healing.
If I'm being honest cod has been focusing more in gun detail but I'm quite disappointed that things have downgraded from the last 2 mws
@@epix143 MW3 is ass in gun details and 2042 improved
@@melcorchancla9431 That's because sledgehammer is working on the guns for mw3 and not Infinity Ward.
Battlefield is my favorite and I love to see it being better. It's like 2011 all over again.
@@epix143it was a infinity ward developer doing
Both games are a lot of fun. However, I prefer battlefield.
It's like Comparing Counter Strike and R6 both different games differ different audience
@@ChandranPrema123again crying for mw 😂😂
@@doomguy51read his comment again you *retard* he never said which one was better🤣
I prefer Battlefield too cuz it has exactly what I was looking for; all-out warfare.
same. i just refunded mw3 and got 2042 for 12bucks. its quite fun
Been playing 2042 since launch. It was rough when it came out but I could see that eventually it would be fantastic and I'm glad I was right. It's very underrated now and definitely worth picking up. Super fun, lots to unlock and piss about with. Back to how it should be. My favourite battlefield since bf4 for sure.
Same. Up there with bf1 and bf4
Dont let them fixing the game distract you from the fact that the game at launch was the worst piece of vomit you could concieve.
Not as Bad as vanguard at launch
Not at bad as the BF4 launch@@panzershrek7942
BF4 launch is not only regaurded as the worst BF launch, but one of the worst in FPS history.
@@panzershrek7942 True but how long are people gonna keep saying that? Games much much better now so enjoy it in the state it’s in, launch was a whole 2 years ago now 🤦♂️
Bro I didn’t even realize how nice 2042 was, and I loved it regardless-underrated game now tbh
Always trust DICE. I told everyone from the start 2042 would be another BF4 situation and here we are and 2042 is more than doubling CoD's player count
Bro mw3is beta
@@hybridkamthe beta is less than a month before release its gonna look the exact same, plus 2042 looks better than the other 2 mw games also anyway
It’s making a comeback. And it’s fun now. Battlefield 4 and V were actually hated at launch too but became amazing a year later
@Idkwhatmynameshouldbe662 its dead
Even I think this was a bit skewed towards BF here. Frostbite is just too good at explosions, deformation and all other interactions between player and the world. It was built for stuff like these
Bro the video title is « Ultimate attention to detail » Ofc BF is gonna win cuz its environment is better but dont complain « its sweked » the details are just better with the environment.
thats what the vid is for
This has to be one of the best detail comparison videos I've seen so far between these two games. You don't factor out anything, you don't show no BS, just the best of both games.
And I got to say, battlefield wins by a landslide easily. The only things MW3 are better at are swimming and reload animations.
I think both games are fun (imo battlefield is a lot more fun), but battlefield definitely wins in detail. Thanks for doing such a great job on this video!
2042 is such a goated game now
fr
It's so fun
I find it weird that the trees, vegetation and smaller objects in MW3’s Ground War do not render shadows at all. It looks kinda washed out. The very static nature of CoD maps is expected but couldn’t they include something like Gta V. Like driving over street lamps and smaller trees?
For the vegetation, Im pretty sure it's because it's the beta build. There are some trees that do react to grenades, and such. There's just missing details that the final game might have. The MW2 beta also was missing details.
@@kevinsteelflex7371 Iw4 engine has a,ways had shitty vegetation shading
Bro I didn't even know like 85% of these details on BF😂 I just hop in and play that's it, but now that I've seen this video I will never complain about details knowing what I have and what other games bring to the table 👍
2042 is insanely underrated now. It’s way better compared to the past 5 of games and honestly has some of the best gunplay in any battlefield game.
nahh
@@PhysicalEngineering your telling me you can say truthfully that CoD Cold War and vanguard are better games than 2042? 2042 has better gunplay/jet, tank gameplay than most other battlefield games, but bf1 abd 5 have better atmosphere.
@@PhysicalEngineering go on explain
@@ChloricOdin5in gunplay and it’s animations, cod has perfected it with 2019 MW. But in all others, Battlefield excels.
@@thatplasticbag6953 I am a battlefield fan bruh but the gunplay in this game isn't better than bf4 bf3 cmon now
BATTLEFIELD 2042 IS VERY FUN AND ADDICTIVE ....I LOVE THIS GAME 🐐
Huge Battlefield fan and love and play all of them. The attention to detail is leagues above cod but one thing cod does right is having a variety of game modes. Multi, campaign, warzone, dmz, zombies, etc. One thing I always found Battleifield lacking in is more game mode varity. Conquest and Breakthrough get old after away. Also Cod gun mechanics and weapon customization out paces Battlefield. If the next battlefield and fix those two things it be leagues above the rest imo. Oh and delete Operators, if they wanna keep the gadgets sure but make it and equipment you can chose not an operator and just sell skins that fit different faction models like how BF5 did it.
yes but all the new cods weapon griding in a pain in the ass which makes it a big no when you dont have fk 100 hours for the game
My favorite part is how you didn’t label which one is which, really keeps you guessing and engaged
Easiest way to differentiate is: CoD has yellow hue to it while BF has blue
cod isnt the battlefield killer, Ea is. Worst marketing + stepping away from their own formula + no community interactions anymore.
It's like they intentionally want to kill their own game.
EA forced dice to chase COD’s way. That’s why 2042 suffered a lot. It’s not a typical BF experience.
I had the best moment in BF2042, so I have no hud on, and I get shot, but then get revived and after that I kinda stumble around seeking cover, when as soon as I’m running to my team, an enemy throws a flashbang to them, so my character gets slightly effected so his hand goes up, and as the flash is clearing, I can see my team getting picked off so I turn around and run off.
7:01 a glorious explosion
Battlefield graphics with cod movement and gun animations would be the perfect game
Battlefield for the win man, we cannot compare COD(game for kids) vs BF (game for OGs)...
If you're on console, I'd go with 2042. The movement and gunplay in this game is pretty on par with CoD and the aim assist is not that OP. Also I personally got tired of the 6v6 style of gamemodes and their groundwars were never that hectic. The main game modes are 32v32, but if thats too much they have TDM and rush which is 16v16. Has plenty of weapons and vehicles, although it is lacking in maps ngl. Its on sale now and probably will be for the rest of its lifespan seeing as the launch was so poorly received, but the devs have made countless QoL updates that make it worth playing over CoD imo.
Movement? Absolutely not
2042 movement is clunky compared to MWIII
@@astalkerfreedom567 not referring to mw3 specifically but 2042 falls in line with mw 2019 movement but with better gun play
@@slumville1655 even MW2019
Sure they have some similarities in movement but the feels of it is not as good as MW2019
Gunplay in 2042 is different than Cod since it has bullet spread
@@astalkerfreedom567 spread? Bro almost every gun in the game is a laser beam lol. The recoil is also nonexistent too
@@slumville1655 there is spread but only at longer ranges and yes
The recoil and spread are less compared to previous BF game
But I still disagree
The feel of the movement and gun in BF doesn't feel as good as MW2019
I didn’t expect the difference to be so stark. Battlefield looks 10 years newer.
Por fin alguien hace una comparación real.
Battlefield graphics been looking next level since Bad Company 2. Battlefield, Crysis, & Killzone are the best looking shooting games I've ever seen, even on old consoles. COD is just now catching up
COD being tactical be like "I'm hiding behind a sheet of paper"
Next BF 6 - will be epic masterpiece.
I also hope so. But keep the expectations low, so that there wont be any disappointments.
@@PrasathMGMbf2042 sucks because there was labor turnover in Dice so noobies taking over from the oldies but they don’t know what are they doing back then. I hope they will more experienced after working on the new BF project.
2042 is god game now!!
Wonder how big of a jump we will see for BF/COD once they leave last gen behind
Not much, their goal still is to be easy to run. For bf it means higher density of assets on maps as devs have been complaining about the asset limit in 42
I give one year for people recognize BF2042 as better game, only beacouse it has bad start, but overall BF is superior game over CoD no questions about it.
😊
See you on the Battlefield !
A bullet hitting the human body or just passing close the character would be a amazing comparison for the video as well. Fantastic video 💪🏻
Honestly? Yeah in 2042’s current state it wins over MW3 by a landslide. But as far as actually playing the games? Both are fun as hell. Both games have things I like more than the other. I need to redownload 2042 and give it another whirl.
you should brother with trial and error I think the game is finally fixed, but it needs more attention than its got. its so fun
Hey, can you make simillar video with comparation time to kill ( BF2042 vs COD MWIII ) same caliber from difernet distances???
People acting like bf 2042 never looked like this or had this level of effects and destruction at launch lmaoooo
bruh this was an absolute violation to the new cod jesus christ
Holy crap bro, what clipping/recording software do you use? The quality and frames look so smooth. Also when I export stuff from the editing software It gets compressed and the frames look horrible.
Just use GeForce experience if you have it
Battlefield is something else. Much better.
As a Cod fan, I would say Battlefield is better in terms of graphics, sounds, and attention to detail
este mes compre el B 2042 y el Mw III, 100% sincero, me gusto mas el Battlefield 2042. y el nivel grafico se ve claramente superior el Battlefield 2042
I kinda have always hated Activion/Treyarch 's overuse of decals/stickers for vfx. For example, water splashes and smoke effects look better in Frostbyte because they are actual 3D models and not just an HD sticker.
Notice how bullet impacts in Battlefield display smoke and the smoke has a freaking shadow. While CoD just places 2d stickers for the vfx
dunno why this is a comparison, when its common knownledge on the depths COD goes for, when it comes to details. BattleField always win this kind of thing, because its built for it, COD is just an Arena Shooter. not a massive map that can have its terrain changed by tanks and choppers.
That’s what I be trying to tell COD. Players lol 🫡
As someone who doesn't have any AAA titles... Both games look gorgeous to me... Ofcourse battlefield has lot more details. But considering there are 2 cod games per year and 1 battlefield game per 2 years makes the difference..
one focuses more on campaign + events + BR, other focuses on Multiplayer + good destruction physics.
I loved BF4
I still play BFV
and I’m getting busy on BF2042
The thing is battlefield benefits from world destruction since it’s a massive online war simulation game and the changes players inflict on the map changes the game dynamic in many ways. However, COD is a fast paced arcade shooter with way smaller maps and having this level of destruction might actually ruin the game. Although, maybe ground war mode can benefit from some destruction. Battlefield does look great though not gonna lie.
BAD COMPANY WANT TO HAVE A SERIOUS CONVO WITH YA
Animations and sound effects are must hand to the Infinity ward...
The Sound effects are actually by sledgehammer Games since they Developed mw3, also Most of the Animations are also by sledgehammer Games except for a Few that where Copy and pasted over from mw2
Forget it Jake, Its battlefield.
I have never realized how bf2042 great is!
Wow are we finally back to Battlfield being better than CoD???
if bf2042 have weapon models and animations from COd it would be great
Yes, It would be the perfect game for me.
true. i think the next BF title will be like that
That sure goat
Absolutely! The BF animators are more than capable of creating outstanding first-person animations, provided they are given the chance to do so without EA asking for a 3rd person Battle Royal as they did with 2042 mid-development.
BF4 bro
Is BATTLEFIELD 2042 perfect?
No
Is it fun? Yes imo it is
But i can't say the same about
COD MW2-DLC
Battlefield is great and fun. Cod is cool but boring and hard to win, just respond and already dead.
Also cod dlc from the past is different even the name is cod
Wow I'm impressed. Since when BF 2042 is this good?
Last 2 seasons have been MINT
Season 3 is what started a new path of greatness, then season 4 topped it off nicely, been good since
The backflip 30 seconds in lol
Bruh how did u get a missile to strike in 2042
it was an easter egg that Dice sadly disabled, but I guarantee it will return in an future update. You must activate 3 satellites on the map
Pretty sure it’s still active. Had someone trigger it during Reduxx
@@GlockTuah1017 it recently got removed, satellites are no longer on the map.
@@NALOW84 they weren’t for a while after the Easter egg either but someone activated it in a game I was in very recently. Not since season 6 but it was during reduxx. Ima have to keep an eye out from now on. They should have just left it in honestly
I think you can still activate the airstrike itself, but rewards for it are removed
@6:55 okay that was BAD ASS
As much as I like Call of Duty more, I have to admit bf the details are better
Seriously, I don't get why COD is so afraid to implement dynamic destruction on some props like trees, fences, decors, tables, etc? I mean yes, you can't still destroy buildings, but at least make players destroy some smaller objects, to make it more... dynamic.
Acho que os fãs de CoD ficaram meio com pé atrás, não vejo comentários deles kkkk.
Also, can we talk about the sounds? In Battlefield the audio always seems grounded and has accurate reverb and atmospherics. CoD feels kinda flat in comparison. Also, why has the player character in CoD no foot step sounds?
COD has better weapon models and weapon animations. Better gun shots and better water physics. Everything literally EVERYTHING else is better in battlefield
Frostbite engine is superior in physics, lighting, shadow, sounds, weather simulation and destruction.
Battlefield wins🏆💪🏆💪
one thing you need to understand COD was never for map destruction, and that is also the point that cod is a E Sport Title
Can't believe people still compare a game that was released in this month to a game was released a year ago
Call duty with corny graphics 2042 is now the goat .MW3 will die soon because of the pay to win, matchmaking and allot of issues and always played COD but now the game is trash.
Battlefield needs to do a version of dmz
They need zombies mode.
That fucking UAV is making me mad.
Battlefield 2042 impresionante WIN 🎉
Well, call of duty has zombies and a few good campaigns, i like what black ops 3 did with future stuff but i feel like titanfall shouldn't have come out so call of duty could have had all that content.. but it looks like battlefield 2042 is actually good. I definitely liked battlefield 3 a lot, it would be nice to just get a remake of battlefield 3 tbh.
As owner of both games I can admit that mw 3 is much more crispier than battlefield 2042 on ps 5. Although if you have Xbox series x it might be other way around
Still dont know why people are still hating on BF2042
2042 always had better visuals than COD. People are only realizing this now
Lighting, colors and the general atmosphere of the environment is better in bf 2042 than cod but still both don’t hit that sweet spot
Reloading animation is better for CoD but everything else I still prefer BF more.
Why is your brightness setting so low
For me the difference between Battlefield and Call Of Duty is destruction because other than that the two are identical
Love Battlefield 2042
Dude the death animations for mw3 are horrendously bad, the one thing I really really love about 2042 is the maxed out particle effects. It makes the game really beautiful. I love cod a lot but I just can’t play it anymore, it feels like something is missing every time
BF 2042 is way much better. Is more fun.
Is it just me or MW3 is too early for us? I mean look at the downgrades compared to the 2 previous episodes. I owned every COD games since MW2019 but this'll have to wait.
The people saying 2042 is better just from this video alone is laughable, you shouldn’t base the entire state and quality of a game based off of how many things can be destroyed. They are very different games that really only have similarities in movement and gunplay. Battlefield has always been about destruction of the environment and mass scale battles, you can argue the same for COD with ground war but it’s main focus isn’t making completely destructible environments. These types of comparisons are fun to watch, but when the person making the video explicitly compares the games based off of unfair factors, of course people will suck up to the one that has more of one specific thing. I’m not saying COD is the best thing ever or even better than 2042, but what I am saying is attention to detail isn’t the biggest factor of making a game good.
Zampella makes things happen
I wish battlefield would have SUPPRESSION FIRE AGAIN and no operators
I love both games.
*so I love battlefield but 2042 is aaaaaaaaaaah not that battlefield what I expected..
Back to MW3 (2011) vs Battlefield 3 comparison. Shame on you, Activision.
You know you just dropped the ball when people start saying that BF2042 is better lmfao
Where is the shadows on vegetation in cod ??
nenhum fps compara com o bf em questão d realismo e imersão
Comparing a bf that already has been in development for a few years to a cod game that was made in 1.5 year, ok..
Gun play actually feels better in battlefield imo but mw3 animations are better
nope
The style of the two games is different. You cannot compare them
its normal that battlefield have almost everything in it destructible...
and better environment? lets say?
Call All Duty is a game focused on
5 v 5 for example?
since release you barly can destroy a door lol
anyway i love both games
Battlefield is under rated
Battlefield has always been superior in details and graphic quality, we can say the only and biggest problem for battlefield has always been executives and how poorly the franchise has been directed.
Tbf, in terms of "realism" and accuracy, CoD has been way better later, specially whe it is about the campaign and weapons. Not saying that CoD campaigns are amazing, but are good and theh definetly do their research to try to be as accurate and realistic as possible (aside from post-launch content).
I really do rather battlefield games, but the poor managemebt fron EA makes it really difficult to be worth its price
Dont forget all the mistakes that Battlefield and EA have done even since Battlefield 4 back in 2014.
It is a shame watching so much wasted potential with Frostbyte and the top quality of EA devs and engineers. They really do wonders in terms of their Engine.
Battlefield always better.Cod games are outdated.
Battlefield should have zombies mode. Then it will become a true call of duty killer.
One game, launched complete...while the other launched contentless and was barely a working product
Jesus the lighting in MWIII is SO SO bad. lol
In the video of gambest it showing how mw3 its better but now idk, it suppose bf 2042 its pretty better
Current Battlefield 2042>>last 3 call of duty games
its unfair when you compare a dlc vs a whole game
To be fair, Warzone and Ground War have less detail than the base game
Battlefield anyday 👍