Kindly may provide the name of the last Supreme Court Judgement where you have said SC laid down :- Affidavit filed under O18,R4 CPC is not evidence with in Sec 3 of IEA unless deponent is subjected to cross examination.
Br.vary nice video. 👍.Plz, tell me if the court lead cross of the plantiff, nd start DE, to plantiff keb apni evidece kerwa skta h, Ya DE start hony k baad nhi ho sekta, plz tell us.🙏🙏
You have stated that exam in chief in section 4 of order 18 is not evidence if not cross examined per section 3 of ind evidence act. Section 3 of evidence act doesn't say so. Clarify.
Sir namaste Maine apne divorce ke 18(4) me document wale evidence de diye hai. Lekin padosiyon ke naam nahi diya hai. Kya unka naam add karwa sakta hu ?
धन्यवाद श्रीमान
अद्भुत हैं आप
ऐसे और वीडियो बनाइए
Kindly may provide the name of the last Supreme Court Judgement where you have said SC laid down :- Affidavit filed under O18,R4 CPC is not evidence with in Sec 3 of IEA unless deponent is subjected to cross examination.
Excellent teacher
Good Sir
God bless you 🙏
❤❤❤❤🙏🙏🙏🙏
Sir, pls make a video related Adverse Possession(Co-owner,Joint property) Cross examination in civil case.
Good lecture Sir.
Super, keep it up.
Br.vary nice video. 👍.Plz, tell me if the court lead cross of the plantiff, nd start DE, to plantiff keb apni evidece kerwa skta h, Ya DE start hony k baad nhi ho sekta, plz tell us.🙏🙏
You have stated that exam in chief in section 4 of order 18 is not evidence if not cross examined per section 3 of ind evidence act. Section 3 of evidence act doesn't say so. Clarify.
Good morning Sir 🙏
Sir namaste
Maine apne divorce ke 18(4) me document wale evidence de diye hai. Lekin padosiyon ke naam nahi diya hai. Kya unka naam add karwa sakta hu ?
O16 R14 n O18 R17