Well, I am not professional photographer, I am all over the place. I recently bought a ring flash which I use with my Nikon d810 and 105 mm macro lens. I will share some of my pictures with you
I use various external lights for mushroom photography. After watching your video, I ordered two Pod Minis and 2 Lighting Arms (Versatile and Cool white) with Diffusers Level 1 from Adaptalux. They arrived in Germany a week later and I tested them straight away last weekend. I am always looking for progress and this light is very flexible and interesting.
I have old knee issues so, wherever possible, I try to move things higher off the ground and create little “scenes”. Love the lights but wow they are not cheap!
I have been using the Adaptalux lights for a couple weeks now and I really like them! Lot’s of “flexibility” (pun intended!) The lights have various ways to diffuse the light and the amount of light generated is adjustable with the app or on the controller. Works a LOT better than flash!!
Your backpack is like Batmans utility belt. Filled with awesome tools, useful for any macro shoot! Your compositions are always great and well lit. Thanks for sharing.👍
Very good video and I'm impressed with the "go out and practice" directive! I can watch tutorial videos all day long but I need to put down the computer and pick up the camera! Thanks..
Je suis toujours impressioné de voir que tu utilise de l'eclairage meme le jour et de voir le magnifique resultat. Bravo, beau talent et belle imagination.
Merci Alexandre pour ton feed-back. Comme tu as pu sûrement le constater, j’essaye de travailler à l’ombre ou pendant des journées nuageuse justement pour que la lumière du soleil a un impact minime sur mon sujet. 😉✌️
I think your ability to compose the scene prior to taking the shot are artistic decisions as you create a photograph.. IMO that is part of the process.
@3:00 - For this particular subject and photo, the f:11 shot arguably has a better textural background effect, whilst still serving as a good background _almost_ sufficiently out of focus, although at f:11 it's almost a bit overpowering. But the background was well suited for that, which makes sense, since it is part of the same plant, and it gives the main subject in the foreground a context that doesn't clash. An *f:8 or even f:5.6* aperture instead of f:11m may have worked better. What works best in any given photo is different, the trick is not to get stuck in a rut and rely too much on a single method or approach (like *_always_* minimum aperture or *_always_* focus stacking everything, which just results in a creatively rigid and too predictable 'routine'). Mais à part cela, c'est quand même beau. Bonne chance, Daniel.
Photography is art. I have no problem building the scene that I have in my head. If that means adding or subtracting something from the scene so be it.
Lovely images, already looking at a macro lens and lighting set up. I wonder if macro offers me a way of shooting nature when the weather is poor for my normal landscapes. The additional lighting and colours you use I like very much, adding items I have no issue with.
Thanks for the feedback, my friend. I have to say that macro photography is indeed very fun when the weather is not optimal for landscape photography. Please don’t hesitate. If you have any questions about the lighting I’m using and also if you plan on making a purchase, please use this link to do so and it’s gonna help a lot😉🙏✌️ bit.ly/FlexibleLEDs
Bonjour Daniel passionné de la macrophotographie depuis plus de 25 ans. Découvrant ta chaine aujourd'hui je suis certains que ma technique , vas évoluer a pas de géant Tu viens d allumer une lanterne en moi qui seras a l avenir fort utile dans ma démarche ...Enfin un gars de l EST, créatif et inspirant ,de toute beauté ton travail .Suis abandonné et sonné toutes les cloches pour ne rien manqué ,et j ai envoyé tes liens a mon ami un passionné de macrophotographie de 88 ans avec une collection impressionnante qui seras aussi apprécier ta façon de faire ....
Merci pour ton message encourageant. Je suis content de savoir que mon travail t'inspire dans ta passion pour la macrophotographie. N'hésite pas à me tenir informé de l'évolution de ta technique, je serais content de suivre ton parcours. Merci également d'avoir partagé mes liens avec ton ami passionné de 88 ans. Je te souhaite une excellente journée et plein de réussite dans tes projets photographiques. ✌️😉
Bonjour Daniel. J'espère que tu lis le français car je suis très mauvais en anglais/américain. Tout d'abord, merci et bravo pour ton travail. Tu es très inspirant pour moi ! Concernant l'un des sujets que tu soulèves, selon moi, tu es l'architecte de ton image. Tu la construits au gré de ta sensibilité, du message que tu souhaites faire passer et tu écris ce message avec la lumière, le cadrage, la mise en scène. Donc, personnellement je ne suis pas du tout gêné de te voir construire ta photo. En effet, tel un photographe de studio, tu gères tes éclairages, en ajoute ici, en enlève là, ... rien que de très banal en fait pour un photographe pro. Parce que tu fais de la photo nature, il faudrait que tu ne touches à rien et que tu shoot en lumière naturelle uniquement ? Si certains photographes ont cette philosophie, grand bien leur fasse, je les respecte pour leurs opinions. Mais pour ma part, je ne souhaite pas enfermer mon pouvoir créatif par ce type de contraintes qui n'ont que peu d'influence sur l'environnement. Bien entendu (et je pense qu'il en est de même pour toi), ma limite d'intervention arrive lorsque je dois détériorer l'environnement (arracher, casser, déterrer un végétal, ...) pour favoriser un cadrage, Sinon, en 3:00, je préfère la photo à f/11. Encore une fois, un grand merci pour ton travail ! J'attends tes posts avec impatience tellement la qualité de tes interventions me font voyager et alimentent ma pratique :)
Bonjour Daniel, tout d’abord, merci pour tes vidéos très pro et instructives. Du coup , je souhaite acheter le pack de pod avec les éclairages.mais j’aimerais que tu me conseilles. Si je prends 5 bras. Quelles couleurs me conseilles tu? Merci d’avance poir ton aide.
Si j'avais cinq bras à acheter, je choisirais quatre blancs et un bleu. N'oublie pas d'utiliser le lien pour bénéficier d'une réduction supplémentaire de 10 % ! tr.ee/FlexibleLEDs
świetne zdjęcia. Skąd wiesz ile zrobić zdjęć, żeby je potem połączyć, jak to obliczasz? czasem robisz ich 20, a czasami 50 :) W jakim programie łączysz zdjęcia?
I find The Flexible Macro Lighting system is very interesting. About colors there is a white and a warm white arm/tube. Can you put a few words or a recommandation about white/warm white in a start packet? /Niels
Thanks for your message, my friend! I’m currently using the white arm and I recommend choosing either white or warm white, rather than mixing the two. Personally, I prefer the white, and if I want to change the color, I simply use a color diffuser. I hope that makes sense! If you have any other questions, feel free to ask. Also, here’s a link for you to save an extra 10% off your order: 😉✌️ tr.ee/FlexibleLEDs (tr.ee/FlexibleLEDs)
Really like your method more than macro specific shooters that use an Olympus OM having it set up with macro lens, flash, and big hood diffuser. Your way I can be shooting whatever I want with any camera that I want that has focus bracketing that doesn't also have to have the function of firing a flash very fast like the Olympus. When I see something interesting for macro, just swap lenses and set up tripod, lighting, and scene. And I like how it looks better than flash. Now, for things that can move that I want to shoot like dragonflies, bees, ladybugs, and lizards. I can't use focus bracketing or set up lights. So do I just do a single shot or burst shot with a flash or no flash? Thanks.
Hi, again congratulations on your photographic philisophy, I really like it and you are strongly influencing my choices. I wanted to ask you the exact model of the Benro head that you see in the video for Macrophotography. Thank you very much
Another great video! Would it be possible for you to make a more in depth video showing how you focus stack your images? When I do it i always get artifacts and ghosting around my subject! Thanks!
My own rule is that I can clear the area around my subject, but I can not add anything that was not there to begin with, not even in the background. I can use light to highlight my subject or background. I do not do photo stacking. But I really like your work ✌️
Merci et bravo pour votre travail vraiment très enrichissant. Regarder la vidéo et lire les sous titres en français est très difficile. Parlez vous français ?
I'm shooting with Canon also. When I set up my camera sideways or upside down on the tripod, is there any way to rotate the orientation of the on-screen controls?
Quality vid and tutorial, Daniel. Side by side frames work well. Pic in pic would work better, IMO, if you were not facing outside of the frame - upper right corner would have been fine. Thought you were going to elaborate on the flexible lighting you mentioned at the start of the vid. Thought the flex light system was your “innovative lighting” - capable and versatile fiber optic light system, but pricey and perhaps cost might be a deal-breaker for viewers who are not as invested in macro. Second image w/blurred background works best, IMO. No problem using or own elements to build an image, as long as we don’t imply otherwise. BTW, there’s a YT host/channel that has a name remarkably similar to yours - “Daniel Ockeloen” who covers photo tech. Any relation?😊
Thank you, Paul, for your feedback and kind words. I appreciate your thoughts on the video and will consider your suggestions for future content. Regarding the flexible lighting system, I will make sure to include more information in upcoming videos. As for using my own elements to create images, I agree with your perspective. And to address your mention of another RUclips host, "Daniel Ockeloen," there is no relation between us. Once again, thank you for taking the time to share your thoughts. ✌️😉
I'm trying to find some cheaper alternative to Adaptalux's lights, but there is virtually nothing like that :( Also working with D810 and Tokina 100mm macro lens.
I know! That’s why I’m currently using it and testing it out. If budget is a concern, I would definitely start out by buying one pod mini to play with it. I think you can do a lot with one light only but that’s only my suggestion. 😉✌️ Affiliate link 🔗😉: bit.ly/4cz7i6j
@@DanielAucoinFineArt Thanks. Since I'm thinking of shooting mostly indoors (lightbox etc) I'm trying to do some DIY setup with cheap USB flexible lights, USB hub and some matte color films, for light coloring and diffusion :)
Fwiw, the first image of the goblet shaped “mushroom” looked like it might be what is called a “golf tee lichen” so not maybe not actually a mushroom. The Lilliputian world of the forest floor is fun to photograph. Bring a knee pad!
Here’s the link to the flexible LED lights. That is an affiliate link so if you decide to make a purchase, I’ll make a small percentage and it’s going to help the channel and obviously it’s not gonna cost you more🙏 bit.ly/4cz7i6j Please don’t hesitate if you have other questions 😉✌️
Do you think bunch of Lume Cubes are better than those cables with LED lights? You haven't used it to that time (I mean.. you could live without that), so it's more like a gimmick (?), but not in the wrong way? I don't think it will be yours first way to color the background / lighten your object.
I love working with different lighting equipment since they all have their own advantages. What’s fun about the flexible ones is that you can get a little more precise when working with tiny subjects. It’s only a matter of personal choices. From my perspective, any would work if you’re able to shape them in various ways. I hope it answers your question. Thanks for your comment.✌️😉
There you go, my friend. You can either buy the pod 3.0 with arms or if you want more flexibility in the field, you can buy several pod mini. That’s my preference since I’m always out in the field and need to put the light further away. Hope it helps. (You using this link help me and does not cost more to you)✌️😉 tr.ee/KwAo14QU-R
Photography is a technical process. However, Image taking can be “documentary” where nothing is manipulated, or “art” where the picture imparts emotion but does not pretend to be factual. Like a still life subject in an art class. Each has its purpose. Documentary purists should note, however, that even a “factual” image can lie, based on what is left out of a photo, like the two faces of Mumbai, with a city scape in one direction and sprawling slums if you turn around. Just as long as you’re up-front with what the image represents, both forms of image taking are legitimate.
Just a small piece of criticism and some feedback for you. You stated “Let me demonstrate how I go about blending the image together” and then state that you aren’t familiar with the software. That means, you aren’t demonstrating how you typically blend the images together, you are only doing it this way because of the sponsor read. This tells me the viewer that you use something else typically to blend the images together, which means you dont deem Luminar good enough to use unless it is a sponsor. Still a good video, just one thing that kind of stuck out to me.
Thank you for your feedback. Typically, I use Photoshop to blend images by opening them as layers and using the align feature, followed by the auto blend for a seamless result. However, I find the focus stacking feature in Luminar to be more seamless, which is why I highlighted it in the video. Despite the sponsorship, I believe Luminar provides quick and exceptional results, especially for photographers seeking efficient editing solutions. I will stick to using Lightroom for other features since I am more familiar with it. I hope this explanation clears things up for you, and I appreciate your comment.😉✌️
If fashion model and celebrity photos can be retouched, fans added to flair their hair, and undergo an hour of makeup and hair dressing to present the right image, there is no reason all photos cannot be enhanced similarly for a creative effect. The key is to be honest about your creativity. I have no issue with your approach to creativity at all. The image is our canvas, light our brushes, and post-production our artistic creativity.
I have to admit that my initial response to seeing you take objects and repositioning them and placing them, essentially manually placing the elements in your scene instead of just photographing what you come across, was negative. My gut feel is that it creates a fake scene, it is not nature that you are photographing but some artificial set that just happens to be constructed from natural objects. Yes definitely my initial reaction was that that is not really what photography is about. Almost the same distinction as a documentary vs a Hollywood movie. Both involve cameras but the one is a pure representation of nature, the other is just fake. But I also think that I might be wrong. Maybe I am missing the point. I.e. what exactly is wrong with creating a scene for a photograph if it results in a pleasing photograph? And your photographs are exceptionally pleasing. And it is not like you take a seed and use scissors to change its shape or anything that extreme at all. You simply position the subject in a pleasing setting. So I am actually not sure how I feel about that. I guess how I feel is; I am fine with someone else doing it, and some of your photos that you create in this way are really striking and beautiful. But I don't think I want to personally walk around in nature with tin foil and 5 lights and build little scenes and photograph them. I think, for me, photography is more about capturing the beauty that is there on its own, or with macro with a simple light source or maybe two to light the subject nicely. In summary, it does feel a little fake, because it is a little fake. But, you are also not physically modifying the objects themselves, you are just positioning them in an appealing way. Back to my movie analogy - there are some profoundly beautiful and inspiring and powerful movies. So I don't have a problem with you doing this, in fact some of your images are spectacular. It is just not something that I feel I want to capture, I'd rather capture natural beauty. I'd rather photograph a beautiful girl in a street photography setting, than capture a beautiful but highly make-up laden supermodel on a catwalk stage. Nothing wrong with the catwalk variety though. To me the pretty girl in the street is just so much more real, and more beautiful, even with the small blemish, that the supermodel has hidden under make-up and so has been 'edited out'. I can appreciate the striking images though, no matter how they were made.
Thank you for sharing your thoughts on my macro photography video. I appreciate your perspective on the process of creating images. When I engage in macro photography, my focus is on the serenity of capturing these moments rather than solely on the end result. Each photographer has their unique approach, and I respect your analogy regarding movies and actresses. As you may know, the word "photography" comes from the Greek words for "drawing with light," and I see light as a crucial tool in our photographic endeavors. My style involves highlighting subjects with different lighting techniques to make them stand out and shine. While there is value in capturing the natural beauty that surrounds us without additional equipment, for me, using lighting and reflectors enhances my connection with the subject and the emotions I aim to convey in my images. I appreciate your feedback, and your observations will be addressed in my upcoming video this weekend on the macro photography lighting dilemma, discussing artificial versus natural lighting. I hope you'll tune in and continue to share your insightful comments. Thank you for your engagement and thoughtful commentary. ✌️😉
The f11 was actually better since one could still understand a little of the surrounding. Keep it a little bit realistic, understandable, recognizable. The focus stack one is too surreal and it might as well be ai
![BLACK BAG - Official Trailer [HD] - Only in Theaters March 14](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Du0Xp8WX_7I/mqdefault.jpg)
Do you use lighting in your macro or do you use natural light only?
Well, I am not professional photographer, I am all over the place. I recently bought a ring flash which I use with my Nikon d810 and 105 mm macro lens. I will share some of my pictures with you
I use various external lights for mushroom photography. After watching your video, I ordered two Pod Minis and 2 Lighting Arms (Versatile and Cool white) with Diffusers Level 1 from Adaptalux. They arrived in Germany a week later and I tested them straight away last weekend. I am always looking for progress and this light is very flexible and interesting.
'Rules are human constructs that should at least be questioned if not broken" - a wonderful thought that cannot be overstated.
🙏😉
Thanks for the feedback!✌️
This 👆 absolutely 👌🏻
Amazing video and mini tutorial! IMO there's photography and artography. Both have their place.
🙏 Thanks for sharing your thoughts!
I have old knee issues so, wherever possible, I try to move things higher off the ground and create little “scenes”. Love the lights but wow they are not cheap!
Thanks for sharing your thoughts😉✌️
I have been using the Adaptalux lights for a couple weeks now and I really like them! Lot’s of “flexibility” (pun intended!) The lights have various ways to diffuse the light and the amount of light generated is adjustable with the app or on the controller. Works a LOT better than flash!!
Thanks for your feedback. I quite like these too and I only had them for a few weeks also!✌️😉
Thanks for putting the name of these lights.
Your backpack is like Batmans utility belt.
Filled with awesome tools, useful for any macro shoot!
Your compositions are always great and well lit.
Thanks for sharing.👍
Thanks for the comment, you’re welcome😉✌️
Photography is art. Art often requires manipulation of the scene.
Larry from Texas
Thanks for the comment 😉✌️
Very good video and I'm impressed with the "go out and practice" directive! I can watch tutorial videos all day long but I need to put down the computer and pick up the camera! Thanks..
😉✌️👍
Je suis toujours impressioné de voir que tu utilise de l'eclairage meme le jour et de voir le magnifique resultat.
Bravo, beau talent et belle imagination.
Merci Alexandre pour ton feed-back. Comme tu as pu sûrement le constater, j’essaye de travailler à l’ombre ou pendant des journées nuageuse justement pour que la lumière du soleil a un impact minime sur mon sujet.
😉✌️
thank you for sharing. i like the context from the f11
You're welcome! 🙏
Thanks
I think your ability to compose the scene prior to taking the shot are artistic decisions as you create a photograph.. IMO that is part of the process.
✌️😉👍
Nice vid
love this ❤waiting for the macro lens that I ordered.😊
✌️😉
@3:00 - For this particular subject and photo, the f:11 shot arguably has a better textural background effect, whilst still serving as a good background _almost_ sufficiently out of focus, although at f:11 it's almost a bit overpowering. But the background was well suited for that, which makes sense, since it is part of the same plant, and it gives the main subject in the foreground a context that doesn't clash. An *f:8 or even f:5.6* aperture instead of f:11m may have worked better. What works best in any given photo is different, the trick is not to get stuck in a rut and rely too much on a single method or approach (like *_always_* minimum aperture or *_always_* focus stacking everything, which just results in a creatively rigid and too predictable 'routine').
Mais à part cela, c'est quand même beau. Bonne chance, Daniel.
Merci pour le feed-back!✌️😉
Photography is art. I have no problem building the scene that I have in my head. If that means adding or subtracting something from the scene so be it.
Thanks for your input,😉✌️
Lovely images, already looking at a macro lens and lighting set up. I wonder if macro offers me a way of shooting nature when the weather is poor for my normal landscapes. The additional lighting and colours you use I like very much, adding items I have no issue with.
Thanks for the feedback, my friend. I have to say that macro photography is indeed very fun when the weather is not optimal for landscape photography. Please don’t hesitate. If you have any questions about the lighting I’m using and also if you plan on making a purchase, please use this link to do so and it’s gonna help a lot😉🙏✌️
bit.ly/FlexibleLEDs
I just discovered you, you have a very cool work :) It's crazy, I liked it a lot. I wish you success in everything.
Thanks for that word of encouragement. It is much appreciated.!😉✌️
Bonjour Daniel passionné de la macrophotographie depuis plus de 25 ans. Découvrant ta chaine aujourd'hui je suis certains que ma technique , vas évoluer a pas de géant Tu viens d allumer une lanterne en moi qui seras a l avenir fort utile dans ma démarche ...Enfin un gars de l EST, créatif et inspirant ,de toute beauté ton travail .Suis abandonné et sonné toutes les cloches pour ne rien manqué ,et j ai envoyé tes liens a mon ami un passionné de macrophotographie de 88 ans avec une collection impressionnante qui seras aussi apprécier ta façon de faire ....
Merci pour ton message encourageant. Je suis content de savoir que mon travail t'inspire dans ta passion pour la macrophotographie. N'hésite pas à me tenir informé de l'évolution de ta technique, je serais content de suivre ton parcours. Merci également d'avoir partagé mes liens avec ton ami passionné de 88 ans.
Je te souhaite une excellente journée et plein de réussite dans tes projets photographiques. ✌️😉
Bonjour Daniel.
J'espère que tu lis le français car je suis très mauvais en anglais/américain.
Tout d'abord, merci et bravo pour ton travail.
Tu es très inspirant pour moi !
Concernant l'un des sujets que tu soulèves, selon moi, tu es l'architecte de ton image.
Tu la construits au gré de ta sensibilité, du message que tu souhaites faire passer et tu écris ce message avec la lumière, le cadrage, la mise en scène. Donc, personnellement je ne suis pas du tout gêné de te voir construire ta photo.
En effet, tel un photographe de studio, tu gères tes éclairages, en ajoute ici, en enlève là, ... rien que de très banal en fait pour un photographe pro.
Parce que tu fais de la photo nature, il faudrait que tu ne touches à rien et que tu shoot en lumière naturelle uniquement ?
Si certains photographes ont cette philosophie, grand bien leur fasse, je les respecte pour leurs opinions. Mais pour ma part, je ne souhaite pas enfermer mon pouvoir créatif par ce type de contraintes qui n'ont que peu d'influence sur l'environnement.
Bien entendu (et je pense qu'il en est de même pour toi), ma limite d'intervention arrive lorsque je dois détériorer l'environnement (arracher, casser, déterrer un végétal, ...) pour favoriser un cadrage,
Sinon, en 3:00, je préfère la photo à f/11.
Encore une fois, un grand merci pour ton travail !
J'attends tes posts avec impatience tellement la qualité de tes interventions me font voyager et alimentent ma pratique :)
Wow, quel beau commentaire mon ami. Merci d’avoir le prix de temps de donner ton opinion. Je suis heureux que mon travail t’inspire. Merci😉✌️
Hallo... I m from bandung city indonesia.. Thanks to your ideas about technic photography
😉✌️ thanks for your support
Fantastic presentation of this 8-minute documentary, I enjoyed the exploration in nature, new friend & Like 670 👍, keep it up 🎬 good luck ✅♻️🌳
thanks, my friend🙏
واقعا کارهات عالیه 😊😊
✌️😉
@@DanielAucoinFineArt 😬
Bonjour Daniel, tout d’abord, merci pour tes vidéos très pro et instructives.
Du coup , je souhaite acheter le pack de pod avec les éclairages.mais j’aimerais que tu me conseilles. Si je prends 5 bras. Quelles couleurs me conseilles tu? Merci d’avance poir ton aide.
Si j'avais cinq bras à acheter, je choisirais quatre blancs et un bleu. N'oublie pas d'utiliser le lien pour bénéficier d'une réduction supplémentaire de 10 % !
tr.ee/FlexibleLEDs
@@DanielAucoinFineArt dac merci. Et encore merci pour ton travail inspirant. ✨from Le Mans🏁
Intéressant comme système de lumière pour de la macro photo. J'ai sauvegardé le site web dans mes favoris.
Merci pour la commentaire.😉✌️
@@DanielAucoinFineArt Une petite question. Quelle lentille utilises-tu pour les photos macro?
świetne zdjęcia. Skąd wiesz ile zrobić zdjęć, żeby je potem połączyć, jak to obliczasz? czasem robisz ich 20, a czasami 50 :) W jakim programie łączysz zdjęcia?
Upcoming video on that soon ✌️😉
You’re dressed as Steve from Minecraft! Love your channel man keep it up 👍
😅😉✌️🙏
Thanks for your tutorials. what kind of lights are you using? I would like to buy one
Here’s the link. You can buy multiple lights or single pods and add up if you need more down the line. tr.ee/KwAo14QU-R
✌️😉
@@DanielAucoinFineArt Thank you for the quick response and amazing videos:)
hey, may I ask you how you calculate how many shots you need to have only the subject in focus?
I find The Flexible Macro Lighting system is very interesting. About colors there is a white and a warm white arm/tube. Can you put a few words or a recommandation about white/warm white in a start packet?
/Niels
Thanks for your message, my friend! I’m currently using the white arm and I recommend choosing either white or warm white, rather than mixing the two. Personally, I prefer the white, and if I want to change the color, I simply use a color diffuser.
I hope that makes sense! If you have any other questions, feel free to ask. Also, here’s a link for you to save an extra 10% off your order: 😉✌️ tr.ee/FlexibleLEDs (tr.ee/FlexibleLEDs)
@@DanielAucoinFineArt Thanks for your respond. It is very usefull to me 🙂
Really like your method more than macro specific shooters that use an Olympus OM having it set up with macro lens, flash, and big hood diffuser. Your way I can be shooting whatever I want with any camera that I want that has focus bracketing that doesn't also have to have the function of firing a flash very fast like the Olympus. When I see something interesting for macro, just swap lenses and set up tripod, lighting, and scene. And I like how it looks better than flash. Now, for things that can move that I want to shoot like dragonflies, bees, ladybugs, and lizards. I can't use focus bracketing or set up lights. So do I just do a single shot or burst shot with a flash or no flash? Thanks.
Hi, again congratulations on your photographic philisophy, I really like it and you are strongly influencing my choices.
I wanted to ask you the exact model of the Benro head that you see in the video for Macrophotography.
Thank you very much
This is the tripod I use. tr.ee/Wh_diPfRsC
Thank you very much for taking time to comment, 😉✌️🙏
What kinds of light you used thank you I looking to buy some of them
Please use this link 🔗 to make your purchase and it will help this channel a lot 🙂🙏
Flexible LED Lights: bit.ly/4cz7i6j
when you take photo stacking mode Conon R5 can aliment picture Or use Program?
I use this
l.skylum.com/DanielAucoin
Здравствуйте! Как называются ваши фонарики?) на гибких ножках:)
tr.ee/FlexibleLEDs
Another great video! Would it be possible for you to make a more in depth video showing how you focus stack your images? When I do it i always get artifacts and ghosting around my subject! Thanks!
This is an helpful comment, my friend. I really appreciate it and will make sure to cover it more deeply in the next video. Thanks again,✌️😉
1:29 The small funnel-shaped mushrooms are lichens.
🙏😉✌️
Thanks for your feedback
Which lens do you use for macro photography? Loved your video 👌🏻
tr.ee/hZnzeBUpxe
✌️😉
Thanks Daniel for the tips. I really loved your videos. How to be you? 😅😅😅
Just be yourself! Being authentic is key, right? 😉👍
Yes sir… long time wait😂😂😂😂
Nice one sir🫵🫡👍❤🙏😇
Thanks man!🤘😉
ahhhhhhhhhhhhh ndumiwe
✌️
Hi Daniel, which L-Mount do you use on your R5?
Promediagear 😉✌️
Thx 🙏
My own rule is that I can clear the area around my subject, but I can not add anything that was not there to begin with, not even in the background. I can use light to highlight my subject or background. I do not do photo stacking.
But I really like your work ✌️
Thanks for your feedback!🙏😉✌️
Hi bro....what setting in camera for this subject..
Please more specific details 😅🙏
Merci et bravo pour votre travail vraiment très enrichissant. Regarder la vidéo et lire les sous titres en français est très difficile. Parlez vous français ?
Merci pour la rétroaction !
😉✌️
I'm shooting with Canon also. When I set up my camera sideways or upside down on the tripod, is there any way to rotate the orientation of the on-screen controls?
Yes, I think so. Here’s a link that explains how to do it.
cam.start.canon/hy/C003/manual/html/UG-03_Shooting-1_0370.html
Quality vid and tutorial, Daniel. Side by side frames work well. Pic in pic would work better, IMO, if you were not facing outside of the frame - upper right corner would have been fine. Thought you were going to elaborate on the flexible lighting you mentioned at the start of the vid. Thought the flex light system was your “innovative lighting” - capable and versatile fiber optic light system, but pricey and perhaps cost might be a deal-breaker for viewers who are not as invested in macro.
Second image w/blurred background works best, IMO. No problem using or own elements to build an image, as long as we don’t imply otherwise.
BTW, there’s a YT host/channel that has a name remarkably similar to yours - “Daniel Ockeloen” who covers photo tech. Any relation?😊
Thank you, Paul, for your feedback and kind words. I appreciate your thoughts on the video and will consider your suggestions for future content. Regarding the flexible lighting system, I will make sure to include more information in upcoming videos. As for using my own elements to create images, I agree with your perspective. And to address your mention of another RUclips host, "Daniel Ockeloen," there is no relation between us. Once again, thank you for taking the time to share your thoughts. ✌️😉
Hi can you tell me where i can buy this lights? Thx a lot
Please use this link if you plan on making a purchase my friend.🙏😉✌️
bit.ly/FlexibleLEDs
You can recommend types of lamps for macro photography in your next video?
Yes, that’s a great idea. Thanks for your comment.😉✌️
I'm trying to find some cheaper alternative to Adaptalux's lights, but there is virtually nothing like that :( Also working with D810 and Tokina 100mm macro lens.
I know! That’s why I’m currently using it and testing it out.
If budget is a concern, I would definitely start out by buying one pod mini to play with it. I think you can do a lot with one light only but that’s only my suggestion.
😉✌️
Affiliate link 🔗😉: bit.ly/4cz7i6j
@@DanielAucoinFineArt Thanks. Since I'm thinking of shooting mostly indoors (lightbox etc) I'm trying to do some DIY setup with cheap USB flexible lights, USB hub and some matte color films, for light coloring and diffusion :)
Fwiw, the first image of the goblet shaped “mushroom” looked like it might be what is called a “golf tee lichen” so not maybe not actually a mushroom. The Lilliputian world of the forest floor is fun to photograph. Bring a knee pad!
Thanks for your comment my friend and dad information. And yes, any pad would be a great addition to my kit😉✌️🙏
What brand the lighting set up ?
There you go, my friend tr.ee/KwAo14QU-R
You can build your own kit✌️😉
The control he did with lights to take the picture with the mobile can anyone tell me about the light device and how he controlled it
Here’s the link to the flexible LED lights.
That is an affiliate link so if you decide to make a purchase, I’ll make a small percentage and it’s going to help the channel and obviously it’s not gonna cost you more🙏
bit.ly/4cz7i6j
Please don’t hesitate if you have other questions 😉✌️
❤❤❤❤❤
✌️🫶
Do you think bunch of Lume Cubes are better than those cables with LED lights? You haven't used it to that time (I mean.. you could live without that), so it's more like a gimmick (?), but not in the wrong way? I don't think it will be yours first way to color the background / lighten your object.
I love working with different lighting equipment since they all have their own advantages. What’s fun about the flexible ones is that you can get a little more precise when working with tiny subjects. It’s only a matter of personal choices. From my perspective, any would work if you’re able to shape them in various ways. I hope it answers your question. Thanks for your comment.✌️😉
多謝分享
🙏🫶
Das Licht ist leider schon lange nicht lieferbar. Kommt das nochmal wieder? Schöne Grüße
Please use this link and accept the cookies to support my channel🙏😉
I’ve been informed that it will be in stock tomorrow!
bit.ly/FlexibleLEDs
Hello sir, I am from India
I'm whtch all videos.😊
Thanks for your comment. You do photography?✌️🙂
어디서 구매 할 수 있습니까? 그리고 어느 브랜드이고 모델명을 알고 싶습니다
There you go, my friend. You can either buy the pod 3.0 with arms or if you want more flexibility in the field, you can buy several pod mini. That’s my preference since I’m always out in the field and need to put the light further away.
Hope it helps.
(You using this link help me and does not cost more to you)✌️😉
tr.ee/KwAo14QU-R
Waiting for your new video bro
In the process!✌️😉
❤
✌️❤️
Photography is a technical process. However, Image taking can be “documentary” where nothing is manipulated, or “art” where the picture imparts emotion but does not pretend to be factual. Like a still life subject in an art class. Each has its purpose.
Documentary purists should note, however, that even a “factual” image can lie, based on what is left out of a photo, like the two faces of Mumbai, with a city scape in one direction and sprawling slums if you turn around.
Just as long as you’re up-front with what the image represents, both forms of image taking are legitimate.
What a beautiful way to put it. Thanks for your thought.✌️🫶😉
Just a small piece of criticism and some feedback for you. You stated “Let me demonstrate how I go about blending the image together” and then state that you aren’t familiar with the software. That means, you aren’t demonstrating how you typically blend the images together, you are only doing it this way because of the sponsor read. This tells me the viewer that you use something else typically to blend the images together, which means you dont deem Luminar good enough to use unless it is a sponsor.
Still a good video, just one thing that kind of stuck out to me.
Thank you for your feedback. Typically, I use Photoshop to blend images by opening them as layers and using the align feature, followed by the auto blend for a seamless result. However, I find the focus stacking feature in Luminar to be more seamless, which is why I highlighted it in the video. Despite the sponsorship, I believe Luminar provides quick and exceptional results, especially for photographers seeking efficient editing solutions. I will stick to using Lightroom for other features since I am more familiar with it. I hope this explanation clears things up for you, and I appreciate your comment.😉✌️
If fashion model and celebrity photos can be retouched, fans added to flair their hair, and undergo an hour of makeup and hair dressing to present the right image, there is no reason all photos cannot be enhanced similarly for a creative effect. The key is to be honest about your creativity. I have no issue with your approach to creativity at all. The image is our canvas, light our brushes, and post-production our artistic creativity.
Thanks for that thoughtful comment my friend. I agree with you.✌️😉
Keep "manipulating" your images Daniel, they're perfect ... I took a look at your lighting gear, WOW! expensive you say 😟
Thanks for your comment. Yes the equipment is on the expensive side but you can do a lot with your cell phone, light and aluminum foil.✌️😉
I have to admit that my initial response to seeing you take objects and repositioning them and placing them, essentially manually placing the elements in your scene instead of just photographing what you come across, was negative. My gut feel is that it creates a fake scene, it is not nature that you are photographing but some artificial set that just happens to be constructed from natural objects. Yes definitely my initial reaction was that that is not really what photography is about. Almost the same distinction as a documentary vs a Hollywood movie. Both involve cameras but the one is a pure representation of nature, the other is just fake.
But I also think that I might be wrong. Maybe I am missing the point. I.e. what exactly is wrong with creating a scene for a photograph if it results in a pleasing photograph? And your photographs are exceptionally pleasing. And it is not like you take a seed and use scissors to change its shape or anything that extreme at all. You simply position the subject in a pleasing setting.
So I am actually not sure how I feel about that. I guess how I feel is; I am fine with someone else doing it, and some of your photos that you create in this way are really striking and beautiful. But I don't think I want to personally walk around in nature with tin foil and 5 lights and build little scenes and photograph them. I think, for me, photography is more about capturing the beauty that is there on its own, or with macro with a simple light source or maybe two to light the subject nicely.
In summary, it does feel a little fake, because it is a little fake. But, you are also not physically modifying the objects themselves, you are just positioning them in an appealing way. Back to my movie analogy - there are some profoundly beautiful and inspiring and powerful movies. So I don't have a problem with you doing this, in fact some of your images are spectacular. It is just not something that I feel I want to capture, I'd rather capture natural beauty. I'd rather photograph a beautiful girl in a street photography setting, than capture a beautiful but highly make-up laden supermodel on a catwalk stage. Nothing wrong with the catwalk variety though. To me the pretty girl in the street is just so much more real, and more beautiful, even with the small blemish, that the supermodel has hidden under make-up and so has been 'edited out'. I can appreciate the striking images though, no matter how they were made.
Thank you for sharing your thoughts on my macro photography video. I appreciate your perspective on the process of creating images.
When I engage in macro photography, my focus is on the serenity of capturing these moments rather than solely on the end result. Each photographer has their unique approach, and I respect your analogy regarding movies and actresses.
As you may know, the word "photography" comes from the Greek words for "drawing with light," and I see light as a crucial tool in our photographic endeavors. My style involves highlighting subjects with different lighting techniques to make them stand out and shine.
While there is value in capturing the natural beauty that surrounds us without additional equipment, for me, using lighting and reflectors enhances my connection with the subject and the emotions I aim to convey in my images.
I appreciate your feedback, and your observations will be addressed in my upcoming video this weekend on the macro photography lighting dilemma, discussing artificial versus natural lighting. I hope you'll tune in and continue to share your insightful comments.
Thank you for your engagement and thoughtful commentary.
✌️😉
In my opinion f11 looked much better and more realistic
Thanks for sharing your thoughts. I probably should have used F5.6 to have something right in the middle. I appreciate your comment.!✌️😉
Call yourself an "image creator" than just photographer, then manipulation is ok
✌️😉
The f11 was actually better since one could still understand a little of the surrounding. Keep it a little bit realistic, understandable, recognizable. The focus stack one is too surreal and it might as well be ai
Thanks for sharing your thoughts 😉✌️
❤❤❤❤
❤️✌️