Emergency exit slide FALLS off Delta Airlines Boeing 767 in NYC

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 26 апр 2024
  • 26-APR-2024
    Delta Airlines Boeing 767-332ER, performing flight DL-520 from New York JFK, NY to Los Angeles, CA (USA) returned to John F. Kennedy International Airport (JFK/KJFK) after the in-flight loss of a right-hand side emergency slide.
    The FAA reported:
    "Delta Air Lines Flight 520 returned safely to John F. Kennedy International Airport in New York around 8:35 a.m. local time on Friday, April 26, after the crew reported a vibration. The Boeing 767 was headed to Los Angeles International Airport.
    The FAA will investigate."
    📌 Details: aviation-safety.net/wikibase/...
    (Sorry for the caption mistakes. I would be happy if you ignore them 🙏)
    Join this channel to get access to the perks:
    / @the_flight_records
    #aviation #realatc #avgeek
    ____________________________
    IMPORTANT:
    This video is all about education. It's designed to give aspiring pilots and air traffic controllers a taste of real-world situations through example scenarios and helpful info. But that's not all! Current pilots and controllers can also benefit by listening to real radio communications from around the globe. This helps them stay sharp and think about how they might handle similar situations.
    To create these videos, I keep my ear to the ground on major aviation news and events. I check the dates and time zones to see if I can find recordings of the radio conversations. Then, I become a bit of a broken record myself, listening to them repeatedly to create subtitles and identify key moments. Finally, I whip up some animations (or grab them from ADS-B websites) and combine them into a neat package.
    ____________________________
    ► e-mail: theflightrecords@gmail.com
    Radio conversations: www.liveatc.net/
    Map: www.google.com/maps/

Комментарии • 191

  • @erauprcwa
    @erauprcwa 13 дней назад +15

    Again Boeing? It's a 30 year old airplane. This has nothing to do with Boeing.

  • @wmmccoy01
    @wmmccoy01 13 дней назад +60

    Lotta people confusing airframe issues with what is obviously maintenance related.

    • @thefreedomguyuk
      @thefreedomguyuk 13 дней назад

      All these malfunctions are intentional!

    • @TobinTwinsHockey
      @TobinTwinsHockey 13 дней назад +1

      Exactly

    • @mikecournoyer
      @mikecournoyer 13 дней назад +2

      The title is more click bait. It should say “AGAIN MAINTENANCE”?

    • @wmmccoy01
      @wmmccoy01 12 дней назад

      @@thefreedomguyuk 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

  • @stevefunnell5573
    @stevefunnell5573 13 дней назад +11

    I Agree! Stop the speculation! That's a maintenance issue NOT a Boeing issue!!

  • @BlueSkyUp_EU
    @BlueSkyUp_EU 14 дней назад +56

    The aircraft is 34 years old. Beside this and a birdstrike back in 2016, no other incidents recorded.

    • @hefoxed
      @hefoxed 14 дней назад +11

      Creator is probably trying to feed into the algorithm with the again Boeing title, RUclips is a tough mistress
      However, a delta plane also had a slide deploy a couple weeks ago while in ground and hit a catering truck iirc. Also older plane. So probably should be again delta 😅

    • @MrCubflyer
      @MrCubflyer 13 дней назад +1

      Well they did run one out of fuel and land on an abandoned runway in Canada, not the fault of the aircraft though that was pilot error and ground crew .

    • @richardjohnson455
      @richardjohnson455 13 дней назад

      @@hefoxedI saw a video here about that slide deploying and hitting the truck but I can’t find it now. Do you know how to find it? Thanks.

    • @richardjohnson455
      @richardjohnson455 12 дней назад

      @@MrCubflyerI believe that was later given the name “The Gimli Glider,” from landing the Air Canada 767 safely on the abandoned RCAF military airfield runway at Gimli, Manitoba. It was a metric vs. Imperial units conversion miscalculation during refueling. The pilots eventually were given an award for airmanship for both a very long glide and safe landing. The Captain had previously been a very experienced pilot flying real gliders. One article is here: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gimli_Glider

    • @richardjohnson455
      @richardjohnson455 12 дней назад +2

      @@hefoxed I wrote you a long Reply about the other Delta 767 Exit Slide hitting the truck, but it was deleted inadvertently during an Edit. It was April 15, 2024 at Gatwick. Several news reports on it via standard Google search. My fault - 72 y/o with bad vision, fingers and probably cognition. Thanks for mentioning it here.

  • @rockkitty100
    @rockkitty100 13 дней назад +40

    Again Boeing? What a dumb header as Delta has been flying 767's for 41 years and it has an amazing safety and reliability rating. STUPID headline

    • @charlesmoore1762
      @charlesmoore1762 13 дней назад +3

      Thank you! Seems piling on to Boeing is “all the rage “ now. Not meaning to slap Delta, but this was a maintenance issue!

    • @eddieflxible379
      @eddieflxible379 13 дней назад +4

      agreed. These folks are outta control ripping on Boeing without knowing the facts of this particular flight.

    • @davidrichards1302
      @davidrichards1302 13 дней назад +1

      RIght... and it's not surprising that parts are starting to fall off 41-year--old Delta aircraft. ;-)

    • @andrewforsythe7240
      @andrewforsythe7240 13 дней назад +1

      Extremely stupid headline. I have flown the Delta 767 transatlantic 10 times, excellent aircraft and crew ! But clearly a maintenance issue here.

    • @typhoon2827
      @typhoon2827 13 дней назад

      😂 tell me you're a shareholder without telling me you're a shareholder

  • @skiph3
    @skiph3 14 дней назад +56

    Delta maintenance not Boeing!

    • @classicalroach
      @classicalroach 13 дней назад

      Thanks Boeing simp!

    • @BeerMetal58
      @BeerMetal58 13 дней назад

      Relax, man. Boeing only kills whistleblowers, not internet commenters. At least, so far.

  • @claycassin8437
    @claycassin8437 13 дней назад +25

    The 767 has an excellent record. This is a random, albeit bizarre, maintenance event. Boeing is an easy target, I know, but at least know your problematic aircraft, guys. The 757/767 line is proven and becoming missed as they age. This is pure clickbait.

  • @21AirDrop
    @21AirDrop 13 дней назад +24

    This is a maintenance problem not Boeing.

    • @AEMoreira81
      @AEMoreira81 11 дней назад

      Or an age problem. The plane is almost 34 years old and with only around 10,000 hours of life left (the Boeing 767 has a life limit of 60,000 flight cycles or 150,000 hours, whichever comes first).

  • @chrishall9740
    @chrishall9740 13 дней назад +8

    This plane is over 20 years old. Clearly a maintenance issue.

    • @AEMoreira81
      @AEMoreira81 11 дней назад +2

      Try nearly 34 years old. It has been with Delta since it was delivered new in 1990.

  • @smal1393
    @smal1393 13 дней назад +13

    As many have said below, it is important to distinguish between engineering issues (737 Max) and airline maintenance issues. The mainstream media likes to 'pile-on'.

    • @douglasthompson2740
      @douglasthompson2740 13 дней назад

      Well they have good reason with the poor job of the regulatory agencies. Three strikes and you are out. Boeing was long given the benefit of the doubt for far too long and look where it landed the traveling public. I would argue that "piling" it on in the media has done more to put Boeing and its stockholders on notice than anything the FAA or NTSB have done. Boeing deserves all that it gets and more. Lives have been lost and the culture remains the same. Keep the light shining on Boeing until its management has been thoroughly changed.

  • @gomez2724
    @gomez2724 13 дней назад +3

    It's fairly apparent the media has it out for Boeing for some reason. If there were any real journalist/reporters left you would have been told that this (as stated in so many comments) is NOT A BOEING issue as it is a maintenance/inspection issue.

  • @JollyMe22
    @JollyMe22 13 дней назад +5

    So far no word as to where on the ground the slide landed...

  • @skydancerforever
    @skydancerforever 13 дней назад +4

    Has nothing to do with Boeing and there planes. It 30 plus years old. It all up to the airlines maintenance center or a part failure. It happens.

  • @f16cc482
    @f16cc482 13 дней назад +2

    The plane left Boeing 20+ years ago. Do better.

  • @stuartfeen9236
    @stuartfeen9236 13 дней назад +13

    Professionalism on display for both pilots and controllers.

  • @mikeybhoutex
    @mikeybhoutex 13 дней назад +5

    Edit: For those who didn't see it, the original title was "AGAIN, BOEING?" or such, then the rest of it as seen. Obviously they've changed the title. That's why you see so many of these similar comment here. Commentary otherwise left unchanged from my original an hour ago:
    Unfair to Boeing here. So many 767s flying with this system. It's had one other incident, a bird strike. C'mon do better. Not gonna watch, not gonna like, but had to comment. Worst case this is Delta, but even then I do not think they pack slides, they swap them out. Slide company may be the problem here. But not Boeing, not until there's a rampant issue with these.

  • @TMccrury
    @TMccrury 13 дней назад +3

    Ignorant headline on this. "AGAIN BOEING?" Folks, this airplane is 34 years old and has been through so many maintenance checks since it was first built and has so many new parts on it its barely the same airplane it was when it left the assembly line. No one in their right mind can pass the blame for this incident off to Boeing. This is purely a Delta Maintenance issue.

    • @douglasthompson2740
      @douglasthompson2740 13 дней назад

      And where do you think those "new parts" came from? And who would install the more important systems? When you buy aircraft you buy their parts and their service manuals among many other things. When major overhauls come around a lot of work is contracted with the experts from the manufacturer. So much has been hidden, covered up, and glossed over by Boeing and its 'close' relationship with the FAA, Congress, etc. that we will never know what glitches caused what problems in the past and importantly in the future as long as the culture remains unchanged. The heading is quite appropriate and well deserved. In three or four years the FAA may deem to let us know what caused the problem or they may not so in the meantime I will go Airbus.

    • @88SC
      @88SC 13 дней назад +1

      @@douglasthompson2740 it’s on the airline. Period.

    • @TMccrury
      @TMccrury 13 дней назад +1

      @@douglasthompson2740 Delta has their own repair facilities and most of their own maintenance including heavy maintenance. This issue has zero to do with Boeing other than it’s a Boring jet. It has everything to do with Delta Tech Ops not doing something correctly.

  • @jimw1615
    @jimw1615 6 дней назад

    The reporting of this incident has been downright poor. Most people associate an emergency exit slide with those mounted on the inside of an entry/exit door of an airliner. This Emergency Exit slide is one which deploys from the fuselage near the trailing edge (the rear end) of the wing to allow passengers using the "over-wing emergency exits" to safely get off the wing and onto the ground.

  • @RHINOTEJAS
    @RHINOTEJAS 13 дней назад +8

    The FAA cannot let these mechanical issues slide.

    • @bbayerit
      @bbayerit 13 дней назад +3

      Pun intended? I liked it whether or not you planned it!

    • @thefreedomguyuk
      @thefreedomguyuk 13 дней назад

      They will !

    • @FloorItDuh
      @FloorItDuh 13 дней назад +1

      ​@@thefreedomguyukthey won't. It will be investigated and changes made where needed as has been for the past several decades. Stop your slander.

    • @RHINOTEJAS
      @RHINOTEJAS 13 дней назад +1

      @@bbayerit Yes! 😀

    • @bbayerit
      @bbayerit 13 дней назад +1

      @@RHINOTEJAS Fantastic! Still grinning over it!

  • @NYCLight
    @NYCLight 13 дней назад +1

    I was questioning what part of NY or Long Island Sound did the emergency slide detach and drop off this flight? It's a big and bright integral component to go unnoticed. There was no mention as to where this may have happened

    • @richardjohnson455
      @richardjohnson455 13 дней назад +1

      I just asked the channel owner of FR the same thing. The Delta lawyers must be on overtime.

  • @edwardmyers8782
    @edwardmyers8782 13 дней назад +1

    Coming straight in has a totally different meaning to me

  • @idunnoanymore2870
    @idunnoanymore2870 13 дней назад +1

    Someone got a free slide for the summer!

  • @nullc0ntext
    @nullc0ntext 14 дней назад +5

    Well at least no one lost their phone to decompression this time... probably.

    • @wmmccoy01
      @wmmccoy01 12 дней назад +1

      Stupid and uninformed statement.

    • @richardjohnson455
      @richardjohnson455 11 дней назад +2

      @@wmmccoy01 It’s just vindictive useless sarcasm to diss Boeing with no constructive purpose or reference to evidence.

    • @richardjohnson455
      @richardjohnson455 11 дней назад +1

      @@wmmccoy01 A much more immediate and serious issue is where the slide fell off and whether it caused ground casualties.

    • @wmmccoy01
      @wmmccoy01 11 дней назад

      @@richardjohnson455 since there's been no reports of that ( and that would have been all over the news) I guess there was none.

  • @TheBeagle58
    @TheBeagle58 14 дней назад +11

    time out! that title is a bit unfair. old ass plane and how about the maintenance team, failed to reinstall it properly. I expect that caption from news media.

    • @hefoxed
      @hefoxed 13 дней назад +4

      It can also be part failure/fatique
      Not sure from Delta, but have heard that some airliners are reducing maintenance checks/testing. So could also be management.

  • @taylorham4life
    @taylorham4life 12 дней назад

    Damn Boeing, You cant get anything right, Your brand new Boeing Airbus B767-3neo's are all falling apart.

  • @handymatt1970
    @handymatt1970 13 дней назад +1

    Ouch.

  • @wannabetrucker7475
    @wannabetrucker7475 13 дней назад

    it used to be enough not to fly, now you can't live near an airport for 💩 falling off planes. Disgusting

  • @RickTheClipper
    @RickTheClipper 13 дней назад +1

    Fly Airbus, see the World,
    Fly Boeing, see the next one!
    Even if it was a maintenance problem, why do they happen more and more often?
    Good maintenance requires well-trained technicians, given enough time to do their job correctly.
    All costs money, but what pricetag has a human life?
    German maintenance guys get educated over a period of 3 years

    • @wmmccoy01
      @wmmccoy01 12 дней назад

      I'm sure you don't know this but Boeing airframes are 44% of those in the sky, where Airbus, 22%. Does that help any?

  • @exBengineer
    @exBengineer 14 дней назад +2

    KC-46 which is a Boeing 767 derivative was known to have these issues, sounds like it's an engineering problem

  • @ronwatkins5775
    @ronwatkins5775 13 дней назад +1

    Was the slide recovered?

    • @Raiders33
      @Raiders33 13 дней назад +1

      It's gonna be a ride at Coney Island when it opens in May. 😉

  • @topofthegreen
    @topofthegreen 13 дней назад +1

    If it’s Boeing, I’m not going!

    • @wmmccoy01
      @wmmccoy01 12 дней назад

      Good, more room for me when I'm flying 757 to ATL. Dumba$$.

  • @jamesbennett5421
    @jamesbennett5421 13 дней назад

    at about the 2:00 mark, is he reporting the # of passengers (pax) onboard vs the # of souls?

  • @madmaxsaturn
    @madmaxsaturn 13 дней назад +3

    33 year old plane

    • @douglasthompson2740
      @douglasthompson2740 13 дней назад

      If it is a danger because of its age, then it shouldn't be flying! When they design it they give the number of flight cycles it is rated for. If it hasn't reached that number with proper maintenance, then it is a design problem and still resides with Boeing. Sorry, no get home free cards for Boeing. They have used them all up!

    • @claycassin8437
      @claycassin8437 13 дней назад

      @@douglasthompson2740 It is not a danger because of it's age. The 767 is an excellently designed and built aircraft. Boeing used to build them well. It is still within it's design age. I'm sure Delta keeps up with it and it's cycles. This was a friggin' SLIDE, man. It happens. I lost one once(on the ground). I also lost the tailcone from an MD-82 on climb out departing from PHL. That was not a Boeing...but it was a black eye on our maintenance department. Amazingly, neither event made even the local news, because nobody had an agenda to try and make money. This video is embarrassing clickbait.

  • @TobinTwinsHockey
    @TobinTwinsHockey 13 дней назад

    Not everything that happens on a Boeing is a manufacturing defect. Many items can be traced to airline maintenance failure. I see a trend in your content that wants to blame Boeing for everything

  • @Captmcsweep
    @Captmcsweep 13 дней назад

    Obviously facts don’t convince thickets. Boeing builds great airplanes. Customers maintain them.

  • @NYCLight
    @NYCLight 13 дней назад +4

    Where over the sky did the emergency slide detach from this flight? No mention of it in the radio transmissions between flight crew and ATC…

    • @pyme495
      @pyme495 13 дней назад

      Over the sky?
      How high do you have to fly to get over the sky? 😉

    • @richardjohnson455
      @richardjohnson455 11 дней назад

      Does anyone yet know when and where it fell? Any casualties?

  • @richardjohnson455
    @richardjohnson455 13 дней назад

    @Flight_Records: it’s only been a short time since this incident, but you’ve already been asked >2 times about the fate of the missing slide. Would you please at least answer about where it fell and what happened to it, or at least if you know any more about it? I imagine Delta and its lawyers and investigators started scrambling to locate it starting the moment they learned of this. Thank you, Dr. J

    • @the_flight_records
      @the_flight_records  13 дней назад +1

      Apologies for missing some comments. I saw the incident on Avherald website and immediately checked for if the atc audio on LiveATC. I couldn't get to some parts initially, but I managed to obtain them after uploading the video. However, the video was already up.
      The pilot reports an issue with the emergency exit slide at 17,000 feet. I believe that's when the incident occurred.

    • @richardjohnson455
      @richardjohnson455 12 дней назад

      ⁠​⁠@@the_flight_recordsMany thanks, TFR! I found nothing more from any news or social media networks about the slide outcome as of a few minutes ago from several news videos found via Google. Did you get any idea of where the plane might have been at that 17,000 feet report? Dr. J.

    • @the_flight_records
      @the_flight_records  12 дней назад

      I guess over Westchester County Airport.

  • @douglasthompson2740
    @douglasthompson2740 13 дней назад

    Hey, something fell out of the sky! Oh, a Boeing must have overflown. They have a super effective weight shaving program. Didn't know that maintenance designed the aircraft!! But it makes me all warm and fuzzy that the FAA is on the case! Maybe they will reattach the parts for Boeing? Seems Boeing is hiring people to root for them in the comments. So far we do not know what the cause is but we do know that Boeing has an overwhelming number of causes. I will just go with the odds and not fly with them. Most likely we will find it was a design flaw enhanced by poor quality replacement parts with poor maintenance guidelines and manuals that have "disappeared". Just one more "quality escape" in Killer Calhoun's view, nothing to worry about.

  • @jumpingjeffflash9946
    @jumpingjeffflash9946 13 дней назад

    The female controller sounds like the same one from the BA 747 stabilized approach/speed video.

  • @Richappen
    @Richappen 13 дней назад

    ATC wants to know the hours of fuel on board not the quantity. 72K lbs on one aircraft could be 5 hours; on another it could be 2 hours, not that it really matters. If it is only 30 minutes of fuel then yes it matters.

    • @dragon_ride_r7528
      @dragon_ride_r7528 12 дней назад +1

      Fire fighters need to know the quantity of fuel on board. ATC pass on this information.

  • @t288msd
    @t288msd 13 дней назад

    Surprised that the controllers flight strip didn't show that the acft departed JFK meaning he had to ask

  • @michaelmcmanus5196
    @michaelmcmanus5196 13 дней назад

    Interestingly enough we have the ability to pick a doctor, dentist, lawyer, auto mechanic, plumber, heck even a dog walker but can’t pick our pilots or type of aircraft when we go traveling thru the atmosphere at 70-80% of the speed of sound.
    We can’t even see the age of the plane or see the background of the pilots who are in the business end of the plane.

    • @richardjohnson455
      @richardjohnson455 12 дней назад

      You CAN apparently pick your aircraft type on some, possibly many, reservations services. I’ve read several reports of people choosing their flight aircraft to avoid 737 MAX airframes.

    • @wmmccoy01
      @wmmccoy01 12 дней назад

      @@richardjohnson455 I flew the 757Max all over Mexico. Smooth and comfortable flights.

    • @richardjohnson455
      @richardjohnson455 12 дней назад

      @@wmmccoy01 I’ve never flown on a 737 MAX to my knowledge, but I reported my comment above after reading that some airline passengers have begun to select their reservations very carefully to avoid certain airframes they don’t trust, specifically various 737 MAX variants and perhaps other Boeing models. I believe it was reported starting some time after the original 2 737 MAX crashes in Indonesia and Ethiopia attributed to MCAS. Did you mean 737 or 757 in your comment about flying in Mexico? Were you a pilot or passenger? Thanks.

    • @wmmccoy01
      @wmmccoy01 12 дней назад

      @@richardjohnson455 yea, fear porn will do that to ignorant people. BTW, I don't mean ignorant as a insult, most are just ignorant of flying and what it entails.

    • @wmmccoy01
      @wmmccoy01 12 дней назад +1

      You most certainly get detailed information on the aircraft you're flying, down to its ICANN code.

  • @tonytheantony
    @tonytheantony 14 дней назад +8

    If it's a Boeing, parts will be going...

    • @BlueSkyUp_EU
      @BlueSkyUp_EU 14 дней назад +5

      Listening to European ATC, I lately run into quite a few Airbuses diverting due to smoke & fumes in the cockpit or cabin. Should I go to Airbus incident videos and say "If it's Airbus, it will fry us"? 😅

    • @wmmccoy01
      @wmmccoy01 13 дней назад +3

      You probably don't realize that 43% of the planes in the sky in the US are Boeing whereas 21% are Airbus. Overall, Boeing has a good record except with the fear porn crowd.🙄

    • @beyondEV
      @beyondEV 13 дней назад +1

      @@BlueSkyUp_EU 1 Airbus but well over 15 Boeing / Donald Mc Douglas Planes have been lost due to in flight fire. Bad example.

    • @TeemarkConvair
      @TeemarkConvair 13 дней назад +1

      thats not necessary

    • @silmarian
      @silmarian 13 дней назад +1

      @@beyondEVAnd when was the last one for any of those?

  • @georgebelansek4831
    @georgebelansek4831 13 дней назад +1

    Is it a Boeing issue or is it a maintenance issue with airlines. How are planes regularly inspected

  • @user-cs8ec6zy5m
    @user-cs8ec6zy5m 13 дней назад +5

    This has nothing to do with Boeing. I use to respect this channel but your decision to title this video that, has seriously decreased that respect

  • @mikedee8876
    @mikedee8876 13 дней назад

    should be ok...things falling off aircraft is normal...

  • @samueldavila2156
    @samueldavila2156 13 дней назад

    😮Did the slide land on a random professor's lawn too? Avoiding flying Boeing like the plague

    • @thefreedomguyuk
      @thefreedomguyuk 13 дней назад

      They want to stop all flights !

    • @wmmccoy01
      @wmmccoy01 12 дней назад

      Good, more room for me.

  • @timkis64
    @timkis64 13 дней назад

    boeing doing their ford impression.deliver the junk & get your money FIRST. then do all the repairs thru recalls.

    • @nickv4073
      @nickv4073 13 дней назад

      This plane is 34 years old, dummy.

  • @fafnorcal
    @fafnorcal 13 дней назад +4

    The title is unfair. This aircraft first flew in November 1990. We should be asking why is a major flag carrier still operating a 33+ year old aircraft? Boeing certainly bears responsibility for many issues but this is not one of them.

    • @idunnoanymore2870
      @idunnoanymore2870 13 дней назад +1

      Lack of new a/c coming online so using old a/c in the interim?!

  • @BlackJeepsMatter
    @BlackJeepsMatter 13 дней назад

    Way to go Brandon… oops! I meant Boeing!🤦🏼🤦🏽🤦🏿

  • @joergr82
    @joergr82 14 дней назад +2

    Who still flies 767???

    • @SpottinPlanesForLife
      @SpottinPlanesForLife 14 дней назад +2

      Best plane ever

    • @wmmccoy01
      @wmmccoy01 13 дней назад +2

      Really!? One of the most successful airframes to come from Boeing.

    • @alphamaccao5224
      @alphamaccao5224 13 дней назад

      Man you gotta love with the ignorant and stupid decide to announce to the world exactly how dumb they are.

    • @claycassin8437
      @claycassin8437 13 дней назад +2

      Delta and United, with 66 and 53 in their fleets respectively. That is because it is a fantastic airplane, even if it is near retirement. Enjoy them while you still can!

  • @user-dd9tc4zz8j
    @user-dd9tc4zz8j 13 дней назад +1

    Nothing out of the ordinary there for Boeing.

  • @sharonshoop495
    @sharonshoop495 13 дней назад +3

    So sick of these old airplanes being Boeing's fault. Is it Toyota's problem if a door falls off of your 3 year old car. Get over it. And don't call me stupid!!!!!

    • @bobw53jrma
      @bobw53jrma 13 дней назад +1

      3 years old? Probably their fault.. 30 years old.. no, not their fault.

    • @kentuckybowl-o-sticks
      @kentuckybowl-o-sticks 13 дней назад +1

      Shirley you're joking...

    • @sharonshoop495
      @sharonshoop495 13 дней назад

      @@kentuckybowl-o-sticks No I am not joking. Same old thing the American way now, Blame it on someone else!!!!

    • @kentuckybowl-o-sticks
      @kentuckybowl-o-sticks 13 дней назад +1

      @@sharonshoop495 That was an "Airplane" joke... SHARON. Remember:
      " ...AND STOP CALLING ME 'SHIRLEY'!"
      SEE? I called you "SHIRLEY", not "STUPID"... oh, NEVER MIND 😂

    • @douglasthompson2740
      @douglasthompson2740 13 дней назад

      Yeah, it is Toyota's problem if the steering fails, the engine explodes, or the doors fall off. Where have you been living? If a door falls off a three year old car the manufacturer is going to have a very major problem. It is called product liability. A product must perform as it was intended and that would include getting from one airport to another with all the parts on board. Planes are sold with a lifetime measured in landing takeoff cycles. They had better be able to accomplish them with appropriate maintenance or the company is liable.

  • @dogmandan79
    @dogmandan79 13 дней назад +1

    When you’re in the most abundant aircraft flying, you can’t blame Boeing. Try labeling the airline instead.

  • @PCBill0622
    @PCBill0622 13 дней назад +5

    Too bad you think you have to title the video implying another Boeing issue. You deserve thumbs down .

  • @SpaceGeek321
    @SpaceGeek321 13 дней назад

    Awesome job on this video! Another month, another Boeing part falls off

    • @davesilver5493
      @davesilver5493 13 дней назад +1

      Nothing to do with Boeing.

    • @claycassin8437
      @claycassin8437 13 дней назад

      This video is terrible. Pure clickbait.

    • @richardjohnson455
      @richardjohnson455 13 дней назад

      @@claycassin8437No, the video is very interesting and worth watching. The title is not the best.

  • @jimjoe9945
    @jimjoe9945 13 дней назад +1

    If its Boeing the door is going.

  • @russcudney1469
    @russcudney1469 13 дней назад

    Amazing the preflight walk-around didn't catch the loose panel

  • @Tom-zi9xw
    @Tom-zi9xw 13 дней назад +2

    All the simping for Boeing in the comments is....funny. Cheer on girls, cheer on.

    • @JAMESWUERTELE
      @JAMESWUERTELE 13 дней назад +4

      You wouldn’t know the difference if they took out the cards on the seat back.

    • @alphamaccao5224
      @alphamaccao5224 13 дней назад

      what you call simping is pointing out reality. Pathetic and stupid when people like you think that ONLY negativity should be pointed at a company. Not even sure why we allow animals with your mindset to continue living tbh.

    • @Tom-zi9xw
      @Tom-zi9xw 13 дней назад +1

      @@JAMESWUERTELE Sick burn. Sick. 🤣

    • @Raiders33
      @Raiders33 13 дней назад +1

      @@JAMESWUERTELE Could literally use a Lockheed Constellation Safety Card from a Connie.

    • @michaelhorne8366
      @michaelhorne8366 13 дней назад +3

      Imagine being the sort of bell end who parrots hot takes on a topic they have no idea about. Boeing did not perform the three yearly remove, inspect and replace of this slide. Delta did. Boeing did not mess up that process, leading to this incident. Delta did. You need to go back.

  • @6StringPassion.
    @6StringPassion. 14 дней назад +1

    Because...accountants.

    • @POVwithRC
      @POVwithRC 14 дней назад +3

      I'm not convinced of that. Look deeper.

    • @6StringPassion.
      @6StringPassion. 14 дней назад

      @@POVwithRC Fair enough.

    • @williamedwards1528
      @williamedwards1528 14 дней назад

      @@POVwithRC The bean counters have been in charge there for the last several years.

    • @DeweyCheatumNHoweLLC
      @DeweyCheatumNHoweLLC 14 дней назад +3

      @@williamedwards1528 Delta's accountants, maybe.

    • @thefreedomguyuk
      @thefreedomguyuk 13 дней назад

      Because.....Stop climate change, and instate our NWO ! 😮

  • @oceso
    @oceso 13 дней назад +2

    everyone talking about how boeing is not to blame; DEI hiring is to blame. the fact that boeing embraces DEI hiring practices indicates that boeing only cares about 1 thing. money. and we all know that money's value follows a simple formula known as TVM, and boeing are the only ones who seem to really care about the current value over future value, except for the city of chicago.
    Let us not forget that Boeing writes the manuals and recommends the training of the maintenance crews. these things are expensive to do perfectly. so their money grubbing racist brains half ass the recommendations instead of just not doing it, because if an airplane company decided to not send over a manual for the planes, it would be bad for the stock.

  • @Perich29
    @Perich29 13 дней назад

    Delta is getting as worse as United Airline.

  • @weepair2
    @weepair2 13 дней назад

    I wouldn't trust Boeing to give my lawnmower a service.

  • @chafouaube985
    @chafouaube985 13 дней назад +2

    Of corse boeing

    • @nickv4073
      @nickv4073 13 дней назад +3

      Relax. The plane is 34 years old. Its a Delta maintanance issue.

  • @daviddenham1511
    @daviddenham1511 13 дней назад +2

    This is the result of accountants not engineers running Boeing……sad

    • @silmarian
      @silmarian 13 дней назад +5

      This is a Delta maintenance issue, not a Boeing one. The plane was built over 30 years ago.

    • @nickv4073
      @nickv4073 13 дней назад

      Hey, Dummy. This plane is 34 years old.

    • @claycassin8437
      @claycassin8437 13 дней назад +1

      A slide failure on an otherwise excellent 33 year old 767 is an accountant's mistake? Huh? Do you know anything about aircraft maintenance and WHO is responsible for it?

    • @daviddenham1511
      @daviddenham1511 11 дней назад

      @@claycassin8437 no, I know nothing, only 17 years as a navigation officer, safety officer, ops controller and instructor……go away you ignorant prat

  • @muddyfeet69
    @muddyfeet69 13 дней назад

    In that case it was not the fault of Boeing. Either it was an installation or maintenance error or simply a failure of the material.

  • @markhancock6694
    @markhancock6694 13 дней назад +7

    This is a maintenance issue with Delta. It has nothing to do with Boeing. Too bad you dont report ALL the issues with Airbus. You would have a video every single day, maybe more often than that. Talk to the real experts. We pilots know the difference between quality and crap.

    • @wmmccoy01
      @wmmccoy01 13 дней назад +1

      Yup.

    • @wmmccoy01
      @wmmccoy01 13 дней назад

      ...and Boeing has twice the number of airframes flying in the US over Airbus.

    • @markhancock6694
      @markhancock6694 13 дней назад

      @@wmmccoy01 Yes, and Airbus planes are in the shop for unscheduled maintenance 6 times more than Boeing. Pilots have nicknamed them "Airbust" which says it all.

    • @Raiders33
      @Raiders33 13 дней назад

      Delta's maintenance contractor's contractor. 😛

  • @CherokeeFlyr
    @CherokeeFlyr 13 дней назад +2

    I don’t think Boeing is at fault for a door falling off of a 34 year old 767. Do better.

    • @Perich29
      @Perich29 13 дней назад

      767 uses powered operated door just like on the DC-10, and Lockheed Tristar.

  • @Peteliao
    @Peteliao 13 дней назад +2

    why do people still fly boeing??? its not safe!

    • @Raiders33
      @Raiders33 13 дней назад +2

      I wonder how many fatalities there have been in Mercedes automobiles...

    • @nickv4073
      @nickv4073 13 дней назад

      This plane is 34 years old, dummy..

    • @Perich29
      @Perich29 13 дней назад

      I'm never flying on Boeing.

    • @bbat2159
      @bbat2159 13 дней назад +2

      Please don’t comment on some thing you’re not educated on. It is a maintenance issue with Delta. Not a Boeing product issue. Big difference.

    • @claycassin8437
      @claycassin8437 13 дней назад

      The 767 is perfectly safe. So is the 757. Boeing's problems are type and age specific, as in their newer ones suck. These older planes were built when Boeing still knew how to build them. I will get on one any day. I will NOT get on a 737 Max, 777, or 787.