§8: Did Dr. John Newbrough really channel Oahspe? Apparently, the answer is a strong NO. Yet whoever channeled it, the great truth is that Oahspe is one of the most important spiritual books ever written and is of immense benefit to those ready to open their understanding about what the spirit world and spirit life entail. I am not asking and answering these questions to disparage Oahspe. It is only because Newbrough has taken actions (by altering Oahspe) to disparage Oahspe (not intentionally in his mind), that I have considered this question. Despite my doubts concerning JBN’s channeling and editing of the book, he did get Oahspe successfully published and promoted across the nation, and eventually, much of the world. On the other hand, if Newbrough had not have hacked the book with the scary, cultist, contradictory, demonically-linked Saphah, Oahspe’s positive impact throughout the world would have been far greater. My argument that John Newbrough did NOT channel Oahspe (though did write Saphah, JKOE, and other smaller text passages) is especially based on a series contradicting Oahspe channeling lies, his horrible treatment of Shalam pioneers, and comprehensive bald-faced lies about Shalam to the public, especially in his New Orlean’s based promotion periodical, The Castaway (1889). Concerning the publicly stated four different accounts of how he channeled the book , these contradictions prove Newbrough lied as there should be no reason to keep changing his story if he had really been the channeling medium. Explore the podcast
I never said I would prove JNB got the manuscript from Blavasky. How is your English these days? I said there is research on it. I mean, you were doubtful before and said I should prove Newbrough was a Mason. Obviously, I did prove that and gave the links for that to you. So, once again, you react in a disrespectful and non-academic manner and non-spiritual matter. Yet you have no response for what I have proved concerning Newbrough NOT channeling Oahspe, which is a big deal. For your information, the purpose of this video is to PROVE THAT, which I have. How about instead just saying thank you for helping the world to understand Oahspe better as it was intended by the Creator.
@joyis9638 you didn't prove it,you just made assertions and alluded to JBN being a mason 🤷🏿♂️...not that that matters in the least. But you didn't prove your point,simple
@joyis9638 you can't even prove jbn and blavasky knew each other🤣🤣 it's just sad.. SMH. You wanna be important so bad .but your salty because your not important. And nobody lends any credence to you or your claim. Envy doesn't lend towards a happy life.But hey,enjoy that lower vibration
No, this doesn't prove anything. The Torah and the New Testament are exactly the same way. Newbrough has given four different contradictory accounts of how he wrote Oahspe... It's the same thing with the Torah and the New Testament. The Torah is composed of four different documents called J, E, P, and D. While the Four Gospels are four different contradictory accounts of Jesus's stories. This is actually quite spiritual that Newbrough has given four different accounts. When we tell a story, we never it the same way....Different perspectives yield a bigger point of view instead of just one point of view.
Oh, Taylor, I would say this newspaper evidence of a single event described by Newbrough in 4 different way does prove he lied. Point-Set-Match. Your comparison of the Torah and the New Testament having new versions is really a very bad one. The reason for this is that the process of the creation of those texts took place over hundreds of years which is completely different than an individual telling of 4 different accounts where significant differences of a single event he experienced took place. Do I really have to explain this too you? You might as well be a Baptist Christian because no matter what evidence or truth is presented to you, you'll just keep burying yourself deeper in cultism. Oahspe states that is exactly what no one should do. I pray that you free yourself somehow. Turn to the Creator. I know you will succeed in this.
So, when we describe a single event we experienced, we can tell it completely differently and that is normal? Used a pen? OK. Used a typewriter? OK. No angels. OK. Lots of angels. OK. 1 named angel. OK. This is why I mentioned in the video that those who live Oahspe as a cult member, can never see the truth. Most likely, like all in religious cults, they are trapped in lies even until they pass over into the cultism dark realms when their mortal bodies die. Love to you always. Don't give up trying to understand the truth rather than protecting your indoctrination.
@@joyis9638 Genesis chapter 1 is one account of creation, but then Genesis chapter 2 is a completely different account of creation. They are two separate accounts of creation. Genesis chapter 1 says that animals were created before humans, while Genesis chapter 2 says that animals were created after humans. Another example is Genesis 24:1-27 and Genesis 24:34-48, they describe the same story, with some variations. The spiritual realm is very fluid and subject to change. This is what happens when you get involved with it. The same thing happened with the New Testament, and now it's happening with Newbrough. It's not a mistake - it's the involuntary impulse of the Elohim's CREATIVITY.
@@joyis9638 Not indoctrinated. I see Jews, Christians, Buddhists, Muslims, Atheists, Mormons and Scientologists as all apart of my spiritual family. There's plenty of others too, but these are my main homies.
@@Taylor-lm5op What reality do you live in Taylor? So once again you are comparing apples and UFOs. How do you rationalize a single event being told 4 different ways with a book written thousands of years ago? So a car salesman can lie to you 4 different times about the condition of a car, BUT THAT IS OK because the Bible told some story differently?! Did you know that the Ten Commandments actually states that LIES are NOT what the Creator of the Universe wants us to do? Turn to the Creator and think without a bunch of dark delusions. That is what Oahspe advocates: logic and truth.
![Oahspe Podcast #70 [ Should Faithists pay attention to the news? ] Mike XCandyXBob (12-3-2024) 🥰😇🙏](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/a8sa8OA84-Q/mqdefault.jpg)
![Oahspe Podcast #70 [ Should Faithists pay attention to the news? ] Mike XCandyXBob (12-3-2024) 🥰😇🙏](/img/tr.png)
Please LIKE & SHARE & SUBSCRIBE & JOIN our sessions! 🥰😇🙏
§8: Did Dr. John Newbrough really channel Oahspe?
Apparently, the answer is a strong NO. Yet whoever channeled it, the great truth is that Oahspe is one of the most important spiritual books ever written and is of immense benefit to those ready to open their understanding about what the spirit world and spirit life entail. I am not asking and answering these questions to disparage Oahspe. It is only because Newbrough has taken actions (by altering Oahspe) to disparage Oahspe (not intentionally in his mind), that I have considered this question.
Despite my doubts concerning JBN’s channeling and editing of the book, he did get Oahspe successfully published and promoted across the nation, and eventually, much of the world. On the other hand, if Newbrough had not have hacked the book with the scary, cultist, contradictory, demonically-linked Saphah, Oahspe’s positive impact throughout the world would have been far greater.
My argument that John Newbrough did NOT channel Oahspe (though did write Saphah, JKOE, and other smaller text passages) is especially based on a series contradicting Oahspe channeling lies, his horrible treatment of Shalam pioneers, and comprehensive bald-faced lies about Shalam to the public, especially in his New Orlean’s based promotion periodical, The Castaway (1889).
Concerning the publicly stated four different accounts of how he channeled the book , these contradictions prove Newbrough lied as there should be no reason to keep changing his story if he had really been the channeling medium.
Explore the podcast
JBN n blavasky🤣 just prove it!!!!
I never said I would prove JNB got the manuscript from Blavasky. How is your English these days? I said there is research on it. I mean, you were doubtful before and said I should prove Newbrough was a Mason. Obviously, I did prove that and gave the links for that to you. So, once again, you react in a disrespectful and non-academic manner and non-spiritual matter. Yet you have no response for what I have proved concerning Newbrough NOT channeling Oahspe, which is a big deal. For your information, the purpose of this video is to PROVE THAT, which I have. How about instead just saying thank you for helping the world to understand Oahspe better as it was intended by the Creator.
@joyis9638 you didn't prove it,you just made assertions and alluded to JBN being a mason 🤷🏿♂️...not that that matters in the least. But you didn't prove your point,simple
@joyis9638 who's research? Why didn't you show any? I'm willing to bet it's only your research 👀
@joyis9638 you didn't show proof for your claim.just four different versions of a story. Many told 3rd and 4th hand you need better sources.
@joyis9638 you can't even prove jbn and blavasky knew each other🤣🤣 it's just sad.. SMH. You wanna be important so bad .but your salty because your not important. And nobody lends any credence to you or your claim. Envy doesn't lend towards a happy life.But hey,enjoy that lower vibration
No, this doesn't prove anything. The Torah and the New Testament are exactly the same way. Newbrough has given four different contradictory accounts of how he wrote Oahspe... It's the same thing with the Torah and the New Testament. The Torah is composed of four different documents called J, E, P, and D. While the Four Gospels are four different contradictory accounts of Jesus's stories. This is actually quite spiritual that Newbrough has given four different accounts. When we tell a story, we never it the same way....Different perspectives yield a bigger point of view instead of just one point of view.
Oh, Taylor, I would say this newspaper evidence of a single event described by Newbrough in 4 different way does prove he lied. Point-Set-Match.
Your comparison of the Torah and the New Testament having new versions is really a very bad one. The reason for this is that the process of the creation of those texts took place over hundreds of years which is completely different than an individual telling of 4 different accounts where significant differences of a single event he experienced took place.
Do I really have to explain this too you? You might as well be a Baptist Christian because no matter what evidence or truth is presented to you, you'll just keep burying yourself deeper in cultism. Oahspe states that is exactly what no one should do. I pray that you free yourself somehow. Turn to the Creator. I know you will succeed in this.
So, when we describe a single event we experienced, we can tell it completely differently and that is normal? Used a pen? OK. Used a typewriter? OK. No angels. OK. Lots of angels. OK. 1 named angel. OK. This is why I mentioned in the video that those who live Oahspe as a cult member, can never see the truth. Most likely, like all in religious cults, they are trapped in lies even until they pass over into the cultism dark realms when their mortal bodies die. Love to you always. Don't give up trying to understand the truth rather than protecting your indoctrination.
@@joyis9638 Genesis chapter 1 is one account of creation, but then Genesis chapter 2 is a completely different account of creation. They are two separate accounts of creation. Genesis chapter 1 says that animals were created before humans, while Genesis chapter 2 says that animals were created after humans. Another example is Genesis 24:1-27 and Genesis 24:34-48, they describe the same story, with some variations. The spiritual realm is very fluid and subject to change. This is what happens when you get involved with it. The same thing happened with the New Testament, and now it's happening with Newbrough. It's not a mistake - it's the involuntary impulse of the Elohim's CREATIVITY.
@@joyis9638 Not indoctrinated. I see Jews, Christians, Buddhists, Muslims, Atheists, Mormons and Scientologists as all apart of my spiritual family. There's plenty of others too, but these are my main homies.
@@Taylor-lm5op What reality do you live in Taylor? So once again you are comparing apples and UFOs. How do you rationalize a single event being told 4 different ways with a book written thousands of years ago? So a car salesman can lie to you 4 different times about the condition of a car, BUT THAT IS OK because the Bible told some story differently?! Did you know that the Ten Commandments actually states that LIES are NOT what the Creator of the Universe wants us to do? Turn to the Creator and think without a bunch of dark delusions. That is what Oahspe advocates: logic and truth.