LIVE: Unsealed Docs Part 2 - Did Amber Heard try to "suppress" evidence?
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 1 авг 2022
- #amberheard #johnnydepp #lawyeryouknow
Special thanks to ANDREA BURKHART for sharing these documents!
andreaburkhart.com/
Want us to break down a specific unsealed document in the Depp V Heard case? Let us know by using the information below!
🔴 Do you or someone you know need to speak to a real lawyer about a case? Or do you find yourself needing legal advice? Please reach out to our firm and we will make sure to answer your questions or find someone who can. Our consultations are always free and confidential. You can call our firm at (727)441-9030 or email us at lawyeryouknow@gmail.com.
✅ For business inquiries contact me at lawyeryouknow@gmail.com
✅ Let's connect: www.tragoslaw.com/
Twitter - @tragoslaw
Instagram - /tragoslaw
Facebook - /tragoslaw
TikTok - /tragoslaw
✅ Join our email list here - bit.ly/33lV3Mb
✅ Get your Lawyer You Know merch here - bit.ly/LYKMerch
✅ Become a LYK Channel Member Here - bit.ly/3OecDDD
SUPERCHATS & DISCLAIMER - 1. Superchats read out are not to be taken as my opinion nor endorsed by me. 2. Questions are answers on best efforts based on my knowledge and jurisdiction.
🔴 NOT LEGAL ADVICE
Intro & Outro Music: DOLYJJVS2W8MGNFM 
Развлечения
Elaine didn’t want these documents unsealed because, as we’re finding out, there is no “mountains of evidence“.
In requards to the point where they asked to bring up the vehicular death that Elaine fought to keep out. Well AH did hire a private detective to dig up dirt on on JD. Now none was found but they specifically gave names for Mr Baressi to dig up. Most were from over 40 years ago. They looked into the Viper Room employees and tried to find anything possible to discredit the man even when he was very young. I have heard a rumor that AH lost her license because she was the driver of a vehicle that caused a death. I think something bad did happen for her to lose her license til she was 21. I know it is sealed but Depp didn't hire a detective to dig up dirt on AH. She was hell bent on destroying that man. She is a twisted individual. I'm no Depp fan either. I'm just a fan of the truth and there doesn't seem to be a shred of truth inside that woman. She has dragged that poor man through the dirt and she doesn't get to play victim now that is has backfired. It's mind blowing the lengths that woman has gone through to ruin the man she claims to love. I hope Noone ever loves me that much. It's sickening. She has proved how horrible of a person she is and I as very sad she has a child. It's even scarier that she's the only parent for that poor baby to depend on. 😔
Agreed!
Man it's the first I'm hearing about her hiring a PI but honestly it wouldn't surprise me one bit
Okay, I think prior accusations of abusing other people on the part of Heard is absolutely relevant to the Virginia case. As Dr. Curry stated, false abuse accusations are a common tactic of female abusers, so the fact that other people are said to have been victimized by Heard would actually serve to establish a pattern of behavior into which false accusations would actually fit perfectly.
Exactly ☺️
I agree 100%
Absolutely. And them having kept these witnesses out speaks for itself.
Dr Curry denied the existence of PTSD in Amber because "there were too many signs of it" and this many signs of PTSD was unusual to occur in the same person. So she assumed AH exaggerated. Imagine the emergency doctor telling you "I'm not convinced you are in pain because you show too many signs of it and I've never seen anyone with this many signs before". 🙄🙄🙄
@@Goodzillla1066 that explanation of what Dr. Curry found kind of ignores a lot of facts regarding how PTSD is disproven. Dr.Curry picked up on the fact that Amber reported symptoms which, on their face, meet criteria for symptoms of PTSD, but the way she claimed to be experiencing was actually inconsistent with the way that PTSD effects the brain, in reality.
As someone who has PTSD, I can assure you that a lot of people think that they know the symptoms, but couldn't convincingly fake it, because lists don't actually give an accurate representation of what it is like to have it. The best comparison I can come up with is the difference between telling someone what ingredients go into a chocolate souffle and telling them how to actually prepare it. Lists don't do justice to nuance.
There's another thing which I believe that neither psychologist mentioned: PTSD and Borderline present in very similar ways. Dr. Hughes went into her examination without entertaining the idea that the abuse didn't happen, so everything she found was colored by that assumption, and she didn't run any test which might disprove her assessment. Dr. Curry, on the other hand ran tests to look for PTSD, and a test to specifically look for faking. She also found that Heard did have symptoms consistent with trauma, but not recent trauma. The ways that trauma effects the brain actually change, over time. Because trauma has been extensively studied, over the past century, we have a pretty good idea of how recent trauma and distant trauma differ. Dr. Curry reported that Heard's symptoms were actually consistent with the trauma occuring in the distant (relative to Heard's lifetime) past. This would make sense, given that it's pretty widely known that she was abused as a kid. Honestly, if Dr. Hughes hadn't reported some symptoms of trauma, that would have been a red flag for me.
Additionally, one of the factors that Dr. Hughes used to support her assertion that Heard wasn't the aggressor was the lack of history of abusive behavior. We now know that Heard actually had an extensive history of abusive behaviors towards others, but that information was just withheld from Dr. Hughes. Lack of access to complete and accurate history of a subject can actually render an assessment practically worthless, because it's foundational information when making a forensic assessment. However, that wasn't the only problem with Dr. Hughes. She would not, on the stand, admit to having ever treated/assessed/testified on behalf of the male victim of a female abuser. In fact, she seemed unwilling to do anything more than acknowledge that they do actually exist. If I were Depp's lawyers, I would have asked Dr. Hughes how she would expect a female abuser to behave in examination, of she were trying to convince Dr. Hughes that her male victim abused her. Bias is one hell of a drug.
12:20 When Amber said she wasn't "nowhere near the county" where the accident happened, that makes me think she most definitely was in he county where it happened.
Literally
Too easily proven
Curious why JD's team did not object when AH testified on the stand that she paid over 6 million in attorney fees and then again when Elaine stated that amount in closing? Why not object? It seemed like there were several things Camille wanted to object to in Elaine's closing, but did not. What was the benefit to JD's case of not objecting when it appeared Elaine was "miss-stating" the facts?
They did. Camille said objection: motion in limine. And they approached
They did object, and after Camille added her objection reasons to her rebuttal closing argument. Something I didn’t know was that it looks bad to object during closing statement, only do it if someone misrepresents the law. After 2-3 objections, I think the judge told Camille to write it into her rebuttal closing argument.
I would generally agree with not allowing the info of who paid attorneys fees EXCEPT it should have been allowed in as impeachment evidence once amber tried to claim that she couldn't make good on her pledges because Johnny sued her n SHE'S had to pay 6 million dollars in attorneys fees... she outright n blatantly lied on the stand, n that should have been allowed to impeach her on that
I agree!
I agree. I think it has more to do with the political capital of the insurance companies than anything…which is scary.
who is paying is entirely relevant when AH claims she couldn't pay the charities due to being sued.
About the fees: So they agreed it couldn't be disclosed who was paying for the defense. Then Elaine mislead the jury by saying Amber spent 6 million. BUT what I find most interesting, is that Amber literally ARGUED that she couldn't fulfill her pledge DUE to the legal fees! So the web of lies she web is even worse than one would initially think!!!
Hope insurance companies use amber and elaines statements against them...
Yep! That’s why this all seems so crazy to me, that they both blatantly lied about it.
This ticked me off so bad but even more so that the lawyer misrepresented this. Surely the heck they can’t bold face lie to the jury like that lawyer or not. Regardless it’s fighting dirty and THIS is why so many lawyers get a bad rap
Would love for her insurance companies to find a clause to deny her.. she is a snake in the grass!!
@@joniwilliams5186 Agreed. I'm sure they were keeping that option on the back burner once she filed her initial claim. Typical insurance company shenanigans, I mean, um...best business practices. Lol.
so based off this, elaine DID mislead the jury stating several times that heard pays the attorney fees. She knew from the beginning the insurance covers it?? WILL SHE BE PUNISHED BY COURT for lying and misleading?? it is SO disappointing the US courts allow everybody to lie as much as they want without any consequence...lawyers, witnesses....everybody...
Whether or not there’s grounds to overturn the judgement against JD, I’m still at a loss as to how AH proved Adam Waldman made those (truthful!) statements whilst acting as an agent for JD. I was keenly looking for it (and watched the entire trial), but I couldn’t see it. If anyone can pick out a piece of evidence presented at trial that would support this assertion, please let me know.
It was confusing the way it mentioned in the trial. There were 2 calls to 911 but not the way Adam Waldman stated which was they called first, cops didn’t see anything, they left. They messed up the place and called back. According to officers there was no damage when they went at all. So I can see why she got that one. Only based on how it was approached/ timelined. It was confusing. But on appeal, I think that should be overturned for the simple fact that Waldman wasn’t acting as a spokesman for JD, it was just his belief of what they did.
Her abusing other people absolutely should've been allowed in. She opened the door to that with her allegations. And I like johnny- she had a prior history of abusing others. It goes to her character, and pattern essentially.
There is a “mug shot” of AH as teenager following her arrest
I believe Whitney’s reality show should have been allowed in because there’s a scene where Whitney shows up beat up and insinuates that Amber physically assaulted her. She physically assaulted her ex girlfriend and has a history of this.
She denied it and reality shows aren't trust worthy in general. She can simply say "we all lied for views for the reality show" and that's the end. You're allowed to say bullshit on TV you just aren't allowed to lie under oath
Issac was such an a believable witness . His recall of seeing the “punching” video between AH and WH goes to their state of mind the week of May 21.
Issac is a true friend of Johnny, I really liked him. Glad when he had to out of the apartment building and Johnny let him Live in one of the houses, Johnny owns.
Also, where were all those "rules" friends, family, colleagues, bedroom partners, have about not to do certain actions that caused a "trauma response"? Surely a fake punch to the face would have been traumatising as all get out so soon after the events.
I still hide under tables/bed if a plate accidentally smashes no where near me (they were thrown at me), and it's 20 years later..... So?
I saw the opposite. A few minutes into Baruchs testimony he started to lose eye contact, to touch his face, sweat, umm-ing and er-ing. Personally I see all of these yt comments as very subjective. But I personally would never believe anything anyone on Jonnys payroll said. There is too much conflicting interest.
I wish Jennifer Howell was called as a witness as well.
Rewatch Crew 🙈 OMG 🙄AH & her team needs to be held accountable for all their lies 🤦🏻♀️
Andrea, raised money to get these papers, lots of us watchers pitched in for the 6000 page documents, she had money left over & she donated the rest of the money raised to get all Documents left over , Andrea donated it to Children's Hospital of LA, they were NOT free thy were $3000 to get them all!! That was nice of her & other RUclipsrs & watchers to donate , for all to use the documents!!!💯
If she hadn’t continue to lie on the stand, knowing these questions were coming, she wouldn’t have looked like a liar. She tried to convince the jury that she had already donated the money. Then she said that she hadn’t fulfilled those pledges “because Johnny sued” her. That was 13 months after she received the $7 million. She sunk herself throughout the trial.
Your lies eventually catch up to you!!
She definitely was her own worst enemy on that stand. If she had kept to the basics of the defamation alone she would have won imo. The lawyers should have known not to put her on the stand. 🤷♀️ 🤦🏻♀️
Not to mention the insurance companies footed the bill that’s her whole problem someone else is always footing the bill
She knew about the lawsuit 6 months not 13
I appreciate what you are doing and enjoy this new hobby of mine learning how the justice system works and learning legalese!
I agree with one viewer, you have an easy voice to listen to.
I have a habit of listening to RUclips talks at bedtime. This video was what I was listening to and you helped me fall asleep! But I'm re-listening today and fascinated with the minutiae of law.
I also like that you are presenting facts and doing your best to be unbiased.
I accidentally fell into the Depp v Heard trial. 2 things happened.1 I became a life long Johnny Depp fan Nd 2 a new addiction to trials that you (and others) stream. Thank you for your fascinating explanations and commentaries. I've learned so much. Yes still learning at 73
Amber's sooo lucky that Camille' holds herself to such a higher bar than Elaine does, because Camille could have wiped the floor with Amber by sharing just this unsealed data alone!
Re: nude pictures of AH -- showing no bruises? She's claiming very serious injuries: nude pics may reveal there were none... Or may show scars pre-dated JD, where she claims they were caused by JD.
Re: Whitney's reality show was about WH being beaten up by her sister, and it's discussed by the contestants on the reality show that Amber did that to her.
A question. I listened to another attorney say that the stuff about Amber being an escort, nude pictures, etc were never introduced by Johnny. Elaine actually brought them up to make it look like Johnny was raising the issues
Yes, Amber brought that up in a taped phone conversation which pissed Johnny off bc he had never said anything. Also, they have to understand there were PI’s involved where the fixer, a PI guy said he couldn’t find an ounce of evidence or even anyone to say anything bad about Johnny on behalf of her team; and that it’s Amber who has the worse reputation: for sexually weird behavior, mean girl, liar, drug addict and abusive personality that her own parents feared.
Their story sounds like Pretty Woman. A wealthy man falling in love with a "working" girl.
Waldman
I saw this same thing as well. I think Elaine brought up the things to make Johhny look bad like he was trying to get these inappropriate things in when really Johhny did not try to get those things entered.
@@susancollins3971 no one is shocked that he married a private dancer? He could have had any woman in the world.
I think that JD should win his appeal solely based on the fact that Elaine said AH had to pay 6 mill in attorney fees when her insurance was really paying it. I believe the ONLY reason they awarded AH anything is the one female juror felt bad for her. Had they known she lied and someone else was paying her fees I also think they would have awarded JD more.
I thought it was extremely interesting when Peter said that if that happened in FL it would likely be a mistrial or at least curative instructions. 🤔
@@valhallaw Yeah Florida is 'special'
The problem with pledge vs donate and the reason it had to come in is that it was instrumental in the UK verdict finding for The Sun. It was obvious that Elaine was going to repeatedly beat the UK Trial drum. It is only fair to bring in the lie about donating.
Ooooh! I never made the connection- about the article, the charities and never donated money. Great point!
The Whitney reality show video was because of the fight Whitney and Amber had. Amber beat Whitney up and you can tell her friends are very concerned about the injuries. Whitney tries to blow it off and does not want to speak about it in the video. I don't think it had anything to do with fame. Johnny wanted to show how abusive Amber is.
exactly. of the whole list of things this one was most relevant. it's not a stretch to think that if she left her sister black and blue in the middle of a reality show, she might hit her husband too
Exactly. Total relevant
I could understand it not coming in. Reality TV isn’t real life. They exaggerate, script, and manufacture things all the time.
The only thing that strikes me as off is, when something was supposed to be kept out yet we still saw it brought up during the trial? Other than that everything else seems to be on the up and up. I think the Judge did a great job.
If somethings suppose to stay out, but a certain party 'opens the door' during testimony, the lawyer can ask the judge to allow questioning
The Whitney reality show video is out there. I'll look for it and send it over.
What either of them do or don't do with charity is their business to me. What matters and speaks to character is her publicly lying about making donations because she "wanted nothing". That is very relevant to this case. The fact that she never filed a tro until her extortion letter went unanswered. That's relevant and I still don't understand why that letter was not used as evidence. It goes to motive. First extortion and then vengeance.
Speaking objections can also function as a way to lead the witness to the lawyer’s preferred answer, so even if the objection is overruled, now the witness can just repeat what the attorney said.. This is clearly what happened in the AH depo in the divorce proceeding.
He wasn't with AH for the Depp trail however
She lied on the stand,and said she didn't pay the charities because she was sued!
Whoa...
Great overview. I like how you address topics and don't meander on nonsensical stuff.
I definitely agree with you that the prior arrest for the driving and references to the car accident should probably have been excluded. I would just caution you from going along with Elaine's framing on how Depp's team behaved with Whitney's depo. I can think of at least a few relevant reasons they may have been asking about the accident at the deposition (e.g. to find out if the tragic death in the car accident could contribute to Amber's purported PTSD). I also imagine both legal team's, but especially AH's are trying to paint the other team in the most negative light, and I've seen other examples of Elaine's motions skewing facts in a way that seems intended to mislead the court... so I approach both sides' motions, but especially Elaine's with a big ol ' "grain of addict salt" (as AH would say).
Oh not that they were together that night, they were having an argument in the car while amber was driving drunk, n he wasn't her friend.. he was her boyfriend.
I'd get shocked if someone would dare to lie about something like that, but after watching how she set there and lied about things so easily... traumatized me! Now not even shocked how easily they lied about this!
Yes, exactly. Peter's take was a surprisingly emotional reaction, not using critical thinking.
It should have been allowed in that she hired a P.I to dig up dirt on JD and he found nothing
I haven't heard about the fatal car accident with a friend before. And I was also very surprised to hear Peter say he finds it appalling that Depp's lawyers would bring it up even though "AH was in a different state when that happened". She wasn't involved and was in a different state according to whom? After everything we've seen transpire in that trial how can you take anything Elaine says at face value?
How many times have we (anyone watching the trial) witnessed AH's legal team try to twist the facts? How many times have we seen JD's legal team do anything unethical? I can't think of one instance for the latter. And I don't even need to comment on the former.
If anything, it makes me wonder if they had very strong reasons to believe that Amber was driving the car when that happened.
It more likely was to go to Amber's state of mind for ptsd.
He didn't say that he believes elaine, he said a car accident 20 years ago isn't evidence to prove someone created a rape hoax. It is misleading and it would have been low if ambers team tried to do that to jd too. That's why the judge didn't put it in evidence and wasnt mentioned in court, thankfully
Really? The newspaper clipping of the accident was posted on Twitter during the trial by a previous mate. Not many who knew her in HS had nice things to say about her. Heard was in HS at the time. Heard's father was arrested for animal abuse!
@@Darthnova-rd9nk How insulting to those of us who are still in therapy for PTSD! Heard does not have PTSD!
@@RainCloud848look i was only pointing out the legal reason john's lawyers would seek Amber's friends death into the court record. Both teams and they therapists agreed Amber had childhood ptsd something she was stated to have mostly recovered from.
The Paul Baresse stuff is interesting, I forget who it was but someone interviewed him on youtube. Basically Amber heard hired him as a private investigator to dig up ANYTHING he could find on Johnny Depp, and he says he did a very thorough investigation and came back to her with nothing but praise for JD from literally everyone he interviewed. Obviously with no dirt to provide, AH fired him immediately and team AH has done their best to silence and discredit him. He was slated to testify on her behalf but again, with nothing bad to say about JD he was dropped, so her lawyers wanted that to be silenced in court as well and I suppose they won because I don't remember hearing his name at trial. I kind of feel that could have been relevant to JD because it shows that she was actively trying to find things to pile on and make him look bad. She wanted him to find other women that were abused and he found none.
The show refers to a comment about Amber hurting her sister on that show
Reality show*
I obviously missed the live but saw the comment about your voice being soothing and I have to say I agree. There have been days that I am exhausted but I really want to watch a video you put out that day and I end up passing out! You do have a very soothing voice!
For those who don’t like that you agree sometimes with AH lawyers, I say who cares. I like the unbiased convos you have
Depps team apparently tried to find other reasons ( the death of her friend etc.) for her claim that she had PTSD, other than it being caused through Johnny
I would like too have more answers to that situation. Who knows more?
Yes! In one magazine interview she talks about becoming an atheist after her friend's death.
Amber did mention that she couldn’t pay The charity pledges because “Johnny sued her”. She implied that she herself had to pay the lawyers. Elaine said the same thing. Both were not telling the truth because the insurance company was paying her legal fees. I agree with you in that nothing so far has seemed like it would have changed the jury’s outcome. Thanks for your time. I really appreciated it.
Enjoy!
Waldman
The donations shouldn't be excluded because it shows her credibility while she still says she donated it. Shows she lies under oath
and they didn't want JDs charitable donations or work to come in either. Her attorneys played it like Johnny NEVER made any charitable contributions.
@@okiegranny4844 or that he never bothered with childrens hospitals until her. Like girl. Please. He’s been doing charity before she was even in Hollywood.
She was on major drugs as well. He didnt ruin her like she did. This is so important. Look back at her interviews. I think she is over used and done! I'm from VA originally but live in Florida. VA dont play as they are a Commonwealth state.
Please listen to Depp singing "Hallelujah"wonderful
Since AH claimed PTSD I do believe some of her past should be allowed with limits to determine if her diagnosis could have been from other experiences and not just the alleged abuse she was pinning on JD
The reality show with Whitney showcased her with visible bruising that she reluctantly revealed was from her sister. It was actually relevant evidence on Amber's abusive behavior and could have been used to impeach Whitney.
Based from what I have seen from transcripts the reason Carinos depositions was done on 2 separate occasions is because Elaine cut into Depps time during the deposition.
🚨 🚨 🚨I think you skipped over an important bullet point in the MIL to exclude reference to discovery-related stuff. They specifically identify not wanting counsel to be able to say that something was disclosed “for the first time in your deposition/discovery response.” I think that relates to CV’s line of questioning about AH coming up with new allegations of IPV that she hadn’t disclosed previously. Remember that AH kept saying she’d never “gotten the opportunity” to give a full list before she did her response to JD’s Xth set of interrogatories (at least I think that’s what she said). (If you get to this after 43:31, my apologies.)
I think nude photos taken after abuse claims should be allowed to show no injury but not for any other reason.
I work in Insurance Defense. Amber probably had to meet a deductible before the carrier kicked in paying the attorney’s fees. I highly doubt her deductible was $6MM.
I really appreciate your non biased approach to the how's & why's behind the decisions and filings regardless of personal feelings toward certain topics &/or ppl. I think it's great! It's fascinating & frankly, I wish these types of legal analysis videos were around 7ish yrs ago when I was deposed in a car accident case. (I was not at fault)... but talking to the insurance company lawyers was freaking terrifying at the time!
Just in watching content on the legal system, I think I could go into another similar depo without being so scared. 😂
How could anyone who listens to u say that you are a Ms. Heard supporter or even a Mr. Depp supporter.
If they actually watch your videos, then they should see that you are just breaking down the info based on the legal docs and explaining the information to us in a non biased manner.
For anyone that believes u are for one or the other, I suggest you look at Mr. Tragos complete video before throwing out comments that are unfounded.
Thanks again for all the great break down and non biased information.
Take care, keep up the great information.
Gerry Kourouklis, I would say it's because some people won't listen to anything that does not completely agree with their thoughts. I was always taught to "listen" before I talk and that I may not always like what I hear.
I think the judge was pretty fair. Sometimes she allowed things that maybe should have been kept out or limited (e.g. the cumulative news articles), but she did that for both parties. It seems to me that the most controversial things came in through impeachment (which is fair) or Eleine's misconduct (e.g. the 6 mils).
I don’t know much and I’ve never had to get a lawyer, knock on wood, but if I ever do I’d call you got in an instant. Very fair, very thoughtful, and great inside perspective. You seem fair, honest, and humble. Even for and FSU guy. Thanks for all the hard work! Here’s to continued success!
Go Gators! 😘
I’m mostly upset why they cut off Jennifer Howell’s testimony. Why??
Such a joy to walk through these with you @Peter thanks a million!!
Thank you for continuing to cover this content - appreciate your insight and love all your videos!
We want ALL news on JD n AH♥️❗️
AH tried to make herself more “wholesome”. Some of this excluded “evidence” certainly goes against her being such. It wasn’t believable then and even more so now.
Love all your programs & what you cover. Thanks!
Thanks for listening
When reviewing the Motions in Limine, please go over JD legal team responses & judges rulings.
Elon Musk and J. Depp, of course! Plenty of great contents and your point of view is right on!
Could one of the issues in rearranging things at your office be the putting green?
Thanks for analysis. I appreciate you going slowly and discussing the items. Your honesty and fairness with AH and JD is also appreciated.
Plus your channel, your rule your content. Folk can make a decision to watch or not. Who's to say you would be interested in the next case/topic anyways.
Robin
I don't understand how this trail became as though depp was on trail for abuse as though he was to be convicted or not. I thought it was whether she defamed him when she wasn't supposed to talk about him according to divorce? or am i wrong?
The case was about misheard defaming Mr depp by writing the op ed. All of the abuse claims had to come to show there was no abuse, physical, to misheard. The defamation was about him abusing her because she stated " 2 years ago", if she hadn't written that then there would be no case, probably.
I blocked Newsweek, they are so misinformed.
Terribly disappointed in msm..no honor
Whitney did not confirm Amber caused the bruises during the published scene, but it's a shame the unedited complete reality- show episode wasn't available, because Whit had clearly already (based on their instant reactions upon seeing the bruises) told the other girls on the show about being physically abused by Amber.previously
I wonder if any of them could testify under subpoena (get out o their f NDA contracts w/the show) if Amber keeps suing her victims(?).
Can JD use the fact that AH stated she had to pay for her lawyers (lie) in their appeal as this could have tainted the jury into giving her the $2m? Especially as they were not allowed to say who was in fact paying
Non of this is monotonous it’s so interesting
Thank you for explaining how the pledge/donate was relevant because AH discussed in the oped. I would have thought maybe it was just trying to show her ability to be a professional liar.
She miss lead jury on purpose with she paid fees
They beat the drugs and alcohol thing to death because it's what they were pinning their hopes on. They had nothing else. Her whole story was created to show that he became a monster when under the influence because some people automatically believe one leads to the other. The problem was he was under the influence off and on his entire life and still never was labeled abusive when he was.
“Fired the first shot”. Camille used this to show AH didn’t really want to “move on”.
Very interesting, thank you!
Wow. This is so fascinating as well as complex. So thankful you explain in a way that is understandable. Thanks Peter
You are very welcome
We still want you to break this down. Thanks 🙏 peter⛳️⛳️🔬
Thanks Peter for breaking down this content.Big shout out from Canada 🙂✌
My pleasure!
Well... Every time I thought I will stop following this case, something new just pull me back. 😆
They can't bring up past lies to show a pattern of behavior?
Could the fact that legal fees were brought up be a reason in Depp’s appeal? Because there was a motion in limine for it to not be brought in. Or would that not work?
I dont remeber the jury being instructed on not answering because it was lawyer attorney privilege is different to I cant answer based on the 5th which people watch on tv and misconstrue with lawyer attorney privilege.
Also, Whitneys reality show video could be relevant. It was her friends asking if Amber started a fight and beat her up
your voice did get smoother :) great video, thanks for covering it.
Thanks for watching!
There is a recording from AUS stating she cut his finger. She admitted it. But not admitted into evidence because his security guard had passed. RIP
They don't necessarily need JD's deceased security person as a witness. More importantly would be to have the Doctor, who treated JD at the hospital at the time of the incident, testify. Or, at the very least subpoena the hospital records. But, there's just a couple of problems I could see with doing this - firstly, if JD specifically requested that the Doctor not record on the notes who was responsible for the injury to JD and, secondly if JD's blood/alcohol/drugs reading at the time would prejudice JD!
@@happycamper4329 the doctor was at the trial. Did you not watch it?
@@doroparker1702 the Australian doctor?
Great work
Yes yes and yes. Without a doubt. no question.
I appreciate your fair coverage. I am very intrigued by the Mutdough case. It's quite fascinating.
It really is!
Thank you Peter. Great video💙💚❤
The belief is the accident that her friend was killed in was the reason she had lost her license. The dv charges were dropped during a hearing. There is audio from the hearing and were only dropped due to where she resided.
Lawyer you know said it was 'appalling' , what's appalling is Heard's lawyers make the despicable claim that erectile dysfunction made someone rape with a bottle, beyond despicable, Heard on the Australia audio, inferred she was violent towards him and I believe Depp when he said she threw a bottle at him and cut his finger off and could of killed him
,he was a fool to cover for her,
she's on tape screeching 'I'm sorry, I didn't mean to do it,does Johnny still love me'
that's a serious lie as well as the lie about Kate Moss and the stairs,
Tmz , the charity money,she makes warped Depp look like a perfect angel.
Thank you, Peter. 🌺
You are very welcome
No, no, no, they wanted to exclude Whitney's reality show appearance because on the show she says that Amber swung on her.
It's all your fault Andrea!! Thak you so much Andrea. 💕💕
Really quick... to anyone saying Peter is either a johnny Stan or amber supporter yall weird. Haha I come to him when I want a completely unbiased view of something! Love this channel and Peter!
A lot of questions are about why Whitney’s reality show part didn’t come up… I think it’s not relevant as much as Whitney’s testimony about stairs, JD’s team could question her more about that and show that she is lying! And her testimony doesn’t match up!!!! Even with Amber’s
Great content Peter. Personally I follow because of your sober and objective lense of what can be polarising cases. There’s plenty of sensationalized content out there that one can view if they want be titillated more than educated.
In regards to 'Terriergate' in Australia, Amber did plead guilty and the Magistrate punished her with a one month Good Behaviour Bond yet no conviction was recorded. Both Heard and Depp, as part of a plea, had to make what we refer to as 'The Hostage Video' to assist with our environmental protection, which clearly backfired.🇦🇺🕊
Both Elaine and AH said that she paid the 6m in legal fees …. Surely that’s an item that should have been able to have insurance companies payments brought in…. Elaine should be sanctioned fir lying to the jury in closing and AH have perjury charges brought against her!!!
Re the Kate moss i believe it was limited on rebuttal because could only be used against the stair accusation and she wasn’t allowed to say anything further
Hi! just started watching your channel and it's great so far. Although I wanted to share that Whitney's reality show clip was relevant to Mr Depp's case because in the clip Whitney and some other girls are all hanging out and one of the girls asks Whitney if Amber beat her up. Whitney seems uncomfortable and tries to avoid the question and says she doesn't want to talk about it.