Watch our previous video with Wendell here - talks about PCIE as the future! ruclips.net/video/5Fz3P41emo8/видео.html Find Level1 Techs here! ruclips.net/user/level1techs
Whatever you said in this video isn't going to get me to stop using Google products regardless of the crap clickbait title. I say whatever, because I refuse to watch videos with clickbait titles. Stopped only long enough to write this comment. Enjoy!
I miss the actual numbers and data evidence to prove "Google" (the search results) got, quote: "objectively worse". Usually I think of GN as a fact based channel - this piece is... different. It's like some ate a pizza with glue in it? I still remember meta crawlers and all that junk, the search results from the past - I haven't noticed any objectively worse results. In fact I'd never ever want to return to lets say metacrawlers ever again. What I've been observing is worse content though - largely copied from one and another, not written by expert matters or just someone talking randomly without evidence etc. Of course that poisons search results. But that's not results being worse, it's just search finding content that's being worse... completely different logic.
What is INSANE to me is that you literally cannot even search RUclips anymore. You enter a search, get like 5 results, and it starts showing me "other videos I may like" and my sub feed
Sometimes I would search some very specific problem and someone on the 3rd page described the solution in some 100 view video. Now the search algorithm is absolute garbage. If you search for something controversial or political sometimes there will be only 3-4 totally unrelated videos. Even if you have the exact video title you sometimes must force to view only channels and search the exact channel manually. We just get fed the results on youtube some people that also released gemini AI want us to see.
15 years ago I could find almost anything I wanted on Google. All I get now are poorly written articles from AI that are completely irrelevant and useless.
There was one specific study/article I found years ago on some chemical reaction that was EXACTLY what I needed for an argument at the time Can I find it now? Nope, doesn't exist. Pages and pages of irrelevant garbage.
It also change your search without letting you know it. You can turn tell me to use precisely the word you searched for. It will still change that search in the background and if it is too precise simply return no results. In the trillions of websites on the internet no matter what words you type there are legitimate sites with exactly those words. Get Google does not allow you to see then
Yes. Modern Google is trash. 100% not organic. After paid ads you get some 8 results max, the rest is AMP trash and then... silence, where did them millions of results go?
Public internet is dead. In the past everything was done publicly-facing on forums boards etc. Corporations and the influencer type of content and manipulation of the medium is and has pushed communities to more private spaces like discord servers and such. Now, the publicly easy access internet is all influencer and corpo bullshit.
if you dont believe it. go on, open a private browsing window. try to surf the web like you used to, dont log into or create any accounts. its useless and irritating. it fucking sucks. internet used to be so much fun.
and Reddot is over-moderated to the point of being sterile. It's impossible to post critical comments on any major subreddit in my experience and questioning either the moderation or the mods will get you banned permanently. There's no warnings, no temp bans and they will ban all connected accounts. Appeals are ignored, there is no communication nor any accountability.
I find Reddit extremely useful. This simplistic way of thinking where you take only the bad and make out something is purely that one thing is just another example of disingenious behaviour. I get you likely get some kind of satisfaction from making this kind of negative comment, but it's just not reality based.
Google's biggest AI letdown for me has been the map directions. I travel almost constantly for work, and up until around the start of 2024, Google Maps had some of the best spoken directions available. I could easily navigate through unfamiliar cities without having to look away from the road. Right around the new year, that abruptly changed, with the directions becoming downright nonsensical, going from reading out street names to "Take the ramp", which usually means go straight, except when it doesn't. I quickly caught on to the fact that Maps was using AI to read signs from the Street View data that had been collected, and trying to directly convey that into verbal directions. Utter failure, and it's nearly gotten me into several accidents when I had to look away from the road in order to figure out what nonsense Maps was telling me to do. It's bad enough that I'm seriously shopping for a dedicated GPS navigation unit, because I can't trust Google's directions anymore.
I've seen even worse, just a few weeks ago Maps tried to steer us down some road that didn't even exist. Bad GPS or whatever. But the fact that Apple Maps got us everywhere perfectly fine, is a statement in and of itself. They started out in 2012 but now have the prettier, more reliable and more up-to-date maps.
On a trip back from the eclipse I kept taking wrong turns on interchanges, cuz I could swore she said to take the turn or exit, but then she'd reroute and I kept wondering how I was mishearing multiple times. Glad to know it wasn't just me. It worked just fine last year while traveling :/
Google maps and Apple maps have swapped places. I used to love google and hate apple maps. But lately my google directions have been letting me down on accuracy, verbiage and ease of viewing. Apple still is not great, but has over taken google with it's back slide into mediocrity.
According to Wikipedia, they did not. Between April 21st and May 4th of 2018, the motto was removed from the code of conduct's preface and retained in its last sentence.
I've put exact video titles into the RUclips search, word for word, and the search results absolutely refuse to give me what I want. It's not until you put the exact title and the channel's name in the search that they give in and give you what you want. It's absolutely ridiculous!
Literally just finished removing google home as it slowly became unusable , removed google chrome from my windows install a few weeks back ....... and now ive migrated to linux with absolutely nothing chromium based. if only we had some sort of group of people who were supposed to protect the interests of regular people to stop them being abused by massive companies .......
They abuse us because the masses allow it. Any system that is put in place to stop it will also be corrupted, again enabled the masses' indifference. Then you'll just end up with another layer of bureaucratic nonsense. The only way to solve the problem is to let the problem correct itself, which occurs in cycles. I'll let you use your imagination as to what that means.
Brave. It’s miles in front of google and bing and equally if not more private than ducksuckgo. Plus the AI feature built in is pretty helpful most of the time.
@@RUclipsTookMyNickname.WhyNot Its really nothing new, youtube has been getting worse for like 15 years at this point. But it is nice that people become much more conscious of it. Like back in the day searching on youtube had a level of utility thats just not there anymore. As long as you dont really, really like Qora...
@@pirojfmifhghek566 I've been using Bing more and more because of the more straightforward approach and them actually surfacing results Google chooses to bury for some reason or another. Plus, copilot is extremely handy, especially in helping me to do my job dealing with SharePoint, power automate, and power apps, etc. It's been pretty invaluable, actually. Google and Gemini, not so much lol.
@@itsmeagain7246 And they relied on reputation to exist, instead of marketing and manipulation and other people excusing away the gaslighting and other abuses by saying it's normal and "every company does it", which is false and a pathetic excuse if it was true, and by blaming the victims for using products.
@@stylis666 Yes and no. There are A LOT of components to this machine and not all apply to every company. One that does apply to big companies is the "too big to fail". they have all the money to do whatever they want without fear of accountability (think farma) or too many people rely on them to work for the economy to stay stable (think banks).
@@moonkey537 Yip! And thank you for emphasising that combination inherent/intrinsic to _to big to fail_ and not feeling any/much responsibility! I personally focus so much on the fact that companies are run by abstract ideals stemming from benefits/motivations of shareholders, and are an entity on their(the company's impersonal) own that I sometimes forget to look at other aspects of those entities/companies.
They used to try and impress consumers. Now they just try to impress shareholders (billionaires). Everything wrong with our economy boils down to how rampant our wealth inequality is and how much we cater everything to seeking the money of ultra wealthy people. It's the inevitable result of an economy that does nothing to try and prevent wealth inequality.
One of Google's problems is severe shortsightedness. "Oops this isn't profitable by the second quarter. Axe it!" or "I don't care if this is the future, it will take 6 years to build. No"
All Google had to do to court trust in Stadia was let customers walk with their games like Geforce Now. If Google had done that, people would've given Stadia a chance.
@@davidmalkowski7850but they couldn’t. Their tech didn’t allow it. They needed bespoke games. It was a platform. I understand that you can argue they could have used proton, because their tech was based on Linux. But it’s kind of a big pivoting move to make on an architecture that wasn’t built with that in mind. They probably didn’t want to sink more money into it. But what do I know. 😂 Cheers.
The thing I love most about Pat "Pat" Gelsinger is that he is a certified *nerd,* having literally _written the book_ on the 80386 processor. Lisa Su has similar _bona fides._ Is it any wonder that we've got the best processor competition we've had in a decade?
It was Page Rank, not MapReduce. MapReduce is just a generic algorithm used to processing big amounts of data. But other then that Wendell's description of how Page Rank worked is good enough.
A lot of people noticed this 7-8 years ago and were mocked and told "it's not happening, that's a conspiracy theory." Now we're in the "is it happening? here's why it might be happening" stage. The next stage is, "OK so it's happening, and here's why that's a GOOD thing!" The problem has nothing to do with them needing to make more money, and they know exactly what they are doing, and so does the state department, but no one is willing to talk about that either.
It's weird isn't it? People know the power of informational control, and yet they think it isn't happening. Call it a conspiracy theory. And act surprised years later...
I remember when google would reverse image search and pull up the actual source of the image even if it was hidden on a darknet page (unfindable without direct link) Then they totally gutted it along with the search engine. You cant even add " " for keywords to find anything of meaning anymore. I miss the old web and landlines
I noticed that too. A few years ago, doing a reverse image search was very reliable. But now it never produces any results when you select "Show Image Source".
Images from "unvetted" sites may contain a vague glimpse of a 17 year old's thigh. Google is protecting our children. You know, all the ones they drive into depression and self-harm with their social media and news feeds.
You're right. Back then you would get the exact picture and it was also able to find and identity parts in the image and find that. Nowadays you get random crap, or just basic images that have literally zero to do with the source image you uploaded. Like oh yeah this weird shaped steel pipe is what is in the source image, which was something that didn't even contain the shape in the first place. Back when, if you put a picture of some not quite global celebrity you forgot the name of Google would find that person more often than not, or at least it would be among the results. Nowadays you are lucky if the results are of the same gender or even skin color (which is merely to say, they are not even remotely close).
Definitely, I honestly don't mind 20-30 seconds long ads, but the minute they are over 1 minute, I'll refresh and refresh or not bother, the ads I am forced to watch I'll mute and do something else I remember the good old days of TV ads that were fun, creative, even edgy, and you'd remember every single one, now ads are just noise like you say.
I think when wendell says "map reduce", he meant PageRank - map reduce is a way of distributing computation, pagerank/backrub was what they used to evaluate page worthiness via backlinks etc
Absolutely, it's worse. I used to be able to find almost ANYTHING I wanted to by using old school search terms. Now to find good, COMPLETE information on what I need, I usually end up on Page 2 or even 3.
Noticed this as well, usually got what I wanted from the first page even though my search might have been a bit obscure but with the right terms in there it would return great results. That does not really happen anymore.
Lucky you can find anything at all. In 2018ish I had to abandon Google because 4/5 of my searches didn't get anything relevant in the first 20+ pages. Yes, I was going through 20 pages of results, then refining the search, then 20 more pages, then refining results. It couldn't even give me results for pages that I had bookmarked when I found them on Google 2 years prior. If a quoted paragraph pasted into the search bar can't be found when I add site:TheSiteI'mSearchingFor then it's clearly trying it's hardest NOT for give me a result.
Who on earth wants to deal with that, seriously? I find immediate and great information using ChatGPT. I use it whenever possible, because the response is just so much more convenient. "Googling" something is WORK. And it gets more and more tedious work.
I'm not sure if it's the case on Google since I stopped using it for search years ago, but I have noticed that some search engines just stop giving results past like page 6.
I did map software for a certain large atlas company. Not only did they inject false information into every map we had to make sure that new false information was injected into every digital map created from their data (following a format they could easily prove was theirs). That would allow them to prove that any map taken from their system and used by someone else was stolen. It was a significant part of the programming for the SW.
Are you the reason why my truck onboard nav system is unusable on certain trips and I have to drive fully manual again instead of assisted? If the you should just disobey your orders because it makes us truck drivers miserable.
@@beenbr7803 Are you setting your destination to nonexistent, unreachable locations, which is what I inserted into maps? Then no, I have nothing to do with why your GPS nav system is failing.
google isnt interested in serving data, their vested interest is keeping their users constrained within their ecosystem for as long as possible to harvest detailed user data...in order to aggregate, collate, and sell that data. the only reason their various softwares work *at all* is to bring users into that ecosystem, regardless of (or sometimes despite) functionality.
That's pretty much why (in the west) Google, and Apple are pretty much the only choices for phone OS. Throw Microsoft in and likely over 90% of all modern tech stuff is under one of 3 umbrellas.
Google used to be engineering driven. Now it's driven by marketing people. It used to be important to do cool stuff that solved people's problems. Now money is all that matters. Thanks Ruth.
This is the same story with every tech company. The creators are innovative, ambitious, and driven... but to grow they need capital, so they get investors. Investors are typically only interested in the profit and as they gain more and more control, the direction of the company is shifted. This is especially true when a company is publicly traded, they have a fiduciary responsibility to make money for their investors. I wish there was a solution to this, where a tech company could grow AND stay true to its origins.
@@flinchy-5224 it's called case law. Still don't think there is such. That's the risks of investments. You might have mistaken it with contracted terms and conditions if any or shareholder dividends. Mismanagement and clear disregard of best interests of the company is something else entirely.
I think years ago (pre llm) they switched to indexing in an embedded semantics. This is sorta the early deep learning for natural language processing era. This made power user phrasing adjustment much harder because similar searches projected back to the same embedding. As a dumb example around 2018 I was searching for repair videos for my dodge dakota truck. RUclips gave me videos for ford rangers. Its "smart" in that both are similar, small trucks but they are totally useless and search doesnt care because they are similar semantically.
Yeah, I alsp regard 2011 as the best year and declining ever since. It has some to do with the rise of social media and declining of forums and other decadent sites. In the past ~5 years it has gotten atrocious though. You search, and it searches for something completely else!
EXCELLENT conversation. Thank you for putting words to what I think we're all experiencing. Unfortunately, I don't know that I heard too many solutions. But at least you all identified the problems.
Google is just the Shopping network now. That's all it's really good for. To find real information you have to have actual knowledge and then include those details in the search prompt.
It is not even good for that. Try for example finding memory when you know the exact product number you need, you get a load of other random stuff that is of no use to you, including fake SD cards.
It's already happened. The Elmer's Glue result was still the top answer to how to thicken pizza sauce after their moratorium ended-only this time it was referencing the coverage of the initial fail.
AI companies are already inventing prion disease for nascent AI. Myself, I'm looking forward to the half-insane AIs eating each other and giving themselves Kuru.
"the precursor to Gemini was duo"LOL no , duo was a video call app like Apple's FaceTime which became an even shittier product called "meet" What he meant to say was duplex But still not the precursor to Gemini that was bard. Where did you find this 🫏🤡
Google results quality fell off a cliff when they removed the "+" operator in 2011 and the "~" operator in 2013. It's been tumbling downhill ever since. The LLM/"AI" adoption is just the next cliff.
I love you guys chatting - always so incredibly insightful. Wendell is an incredibly connected and forward looking guy, I love hearing his opinions on where things are headed.
I was noticing poor results on google today. I’ve already been ignoring the stupid AI stuff that is way too simplistic but this time I was searching for what coolant to put in my tractor and it said it couldn’t find good results. So it suggested that I instead search for things like “what does coolant do” 🤬
Two things I want to mention, is that yeah, reddit has trolls and also bots that has infiltrated it and they make new accounts and cross post the same old posts for drama or engagement. And the second thing, is that its ironic that google is using reddit's data because I find that the best way to search for something on google is to add the word "reddit" at the end of your query so you get usable results
I agree with this. I think Reddit is largely more useful than other social media. It does have a lot of downsides as all social media does but if I've had multiple tech related extremely specific issues that only had answers on Reddit. There can be good advice on there but yeah, it's normally the more niche communities that are useful. I'm not sure why it tends to get shit on more than other social media. Yeah there can be terrible advice but it's not just trolls and bots. It's much more useful than Facebook, Twitter, Discord or Tumblr.
Unironically. I pretty much append reddit to my search results every time I get some useless seo spam article "what silicone to use for bathrooms" oops "what silicone to use for bathrooms reddit"
Reddit is a pale shell of itself. The slightest disent in any subreddit results in Bans by moderators without explaining what rule you violated. For instance Energy is rather Anti Nuclear but this is not in the rules. I was muted for three days for even asking why mentioning that Diablo Canyon geneates up to 8.6% of CAs power. There's no recourse. Say anything negative about a Tesla regardless of how many you own and your banned from all of the tesla groups by a automoderator which is appropriate as Musk says they're a AI company, not a car company.
7:54 I think Wendell is describing PageRank, but calling it "MapReduce". MapReduce, when not talking about a specific software implementation, describes a much more general approach of doing "Map and reduce" at a large scale.
I think he's talking about the 2004 paper MapReduce: Simplified Data Processing on Large Clusters... I dunno if RUclips will flag me as a bot for linking to it, but: static.googleusercontent.com/media/research.google.com/en//archive/mapreduce-osdi04.pdf
A couple of things worth noting here: - Wendell says the AI companies "haven't really come up with a solution to the hallucination issue" - they won't. They can't. Hallucinations are a direct product of how LLMs and generative AI works - because they don't understand concepts like "true", "real", or "made up". Their fundamental function is to produce a statistically likely output of what a response to your query might look like, based on their dataset. They have absolutely no ability to stop hallucinating, because *every answer* is one - it's just that some data is actually present in the data, so they can come closer to a correct answer as there's more concrete data to work from. - It's not just google making the Web worse, it's also the proliferation of AI generated, AI translated garbage - which they touch on, but also pretty much entirely bypass the issues around save for Google's failure to respond to it/inadvertent enabling of it. What were seeing is the enshittification of the web, and Cory Doctorow covers this far better than Steve and Wendell, unfortunately. Also, it bears mentioning that there's a rather shocking level of naivete on display concerning corporate logic (and greed). Google isn't asleep at the helm in terms of not filtering AI trash on RUclips - they *want it there*. Because in the short term, it makes them money, as people having to go through a dozen shitty videos before finding what they want lets them serve you more ads. Yes, this will kill the platform if left alone, but they only care about the short term. That's what corporate logic is. It's the same for every single other corporate platform owner out there. Again: enshittification. Please, Steve and Wendell, go Google that word 😉
If you think corporate logic is short term gain at the expense of long term feasibility, you are ignorant enough that I can safely ignore everything else you have to say. You are just cynical and confusing it for wisdom.
@@tuhaggis Man, have you paid attention to literally anything corporations have done in, oh, say the past 30 years? The "holding companies" buying out successful businesses, running them into the ground through "cost cutting" and selling off the parts of the carcass? The whole "move fast and break things" attitude? The persistent and pervasive prioritisation of short term profits (and shareholder dividends) rather than long term stability and viability? The consistent attempts at skirting or breaking literally any regulation or law if it boosts profits short term, even if it leads to massive fines or tarnishing their brand? The tech giants desperately going after literally every possible buzzword bubble, even if it leads to oberproduction and exaggerates boom-bust cycles? If you think the average corporation has any interests beyond short term profits, you're buying into corporate propaganda, and that kind of naivete... well, I'd say the same right back at you, nothing else you're going to say is likely to be worth listening to. There's absolutely nothing cynical about my approach. Heck, I'd eager I probably have more hope and faith in humanity than you do. But corporations are literally legally obligated to produce short term profits for their shareholders. And they've been acting accordingly for decades and decades. Expecting them to continue doing so is realistic, not cynical.
I am no subject expert - but could'nt you train a highly specific model to rate things ? Like this is a preference thing, this is objectively better than something else, this is a fact, this is not and inject them into other AI Models that create content, like the most common ones that create a fluid and responsive text output for an end user ?
@@DxCBuG it would be just as prone to hallucinations, ratings for things that have good data for would be decently accurate, while ratings for everything else would be just hallucinated garbage
When he says map reduce, I think he means page rank. Google doesn't use page rank anymore, but when it did it returned hyper relevant results. You used to be able to immediately find anything even on obscure forums. These days you can't find anything anywhere, even with an exact text search.
Here's how Google let me down: They took out community subtitles. I used to watch a bunch of videos from overseas and it was GREAT when there was a dedicated community that just wanted more people to see the video.Then they removed it for AI generated subtitling and it was/is pretty bad and I lost track of a bunch of channels as a result.
What is being discussed in the video is the direct, logical outcome of the corporate model of the internet winning over the free and open source model in the 1990s. To imagine a version of the internet - without ad model, without toxic social media model, without sensationalism-driven clickbait headline model, without attention-seeking profit-driven zero-value video model, etc, etc - that could have been realised if the alternative had won, is just a recipe for depression.
And that's why I'm here saying "burn it to the ground". I'm a Luddite. But no, not the "Destroy all tech ever no matter what" luddite. That's a strawman created by those who wish to see me cease existing. For me being a luddite means "If the tech doesn't serve everyone equally, burn it/break it/tear it down" and you can guess how that works out these days what with a megacorp being the sole provider of anything you can think of without getting too specific these days. Point is, the stuff they're providing serves themselves primarily, and the user or consumer purely secondarily. The cart's before the horse. Tech should serve it's operator first, and if it's owner is different, it's owner second, and if it's creator is different, it's creator last. And right now everything's inverted. Tech serves it's operator last right now. So it needs to burn.
It is depressing to think about, although I can't imagine an alternative world where this free internet you describe prevails over the corporate internet. Money makes the world go round and pays the bills. I wish it wasn't the case, but it is.
Corporations always add layers upon layers of complexity to hide malfeasance, you see it in insurance, investment, banking, etc... anywhere to attempt to profit for providing nothing.
the "open source model" wasn't a model and wasn't competing with anything. Corpos came in and just replicated the same thing that works in the real world, because that's what makes them money. Newspapers were often "clickbait" opinionated trash even back in the day. None of those things are even remotely new
yes. google hss become shite and the AI suggestions in browsers now are dumb. normal people can't find shit and anyone who can effectively search is like a tech guru for their friends and family
Google has simultaneously secured my tech job for years to come, yet also ruined it because the 5% of people who used to solve their own issues...using _Google_ ... can no longer find solutions.
Even if you do know how to search there are still problems for example anything even remotely political/historical feels *heavily* filtered. I feel like there's some sort of 'controversialness' rating that your search gets that dictates how wide of a net your results are. Anything it deems controversial gets constrained to mainstream media sources. Slightly less controversial and you might get a wikipedia article, or reddit post. Not controversial at all and you start getting access to more independent material. Ive tried searching some stuff regarding WW2 before and it was a nightmare to find anything.
@@pagatryx5451 The two big engines, Google and Bing have been filtering, curating and outright censoring increasingly heavily year on year, and the 'independent' engines are really only meta-searches of the big two anyway. It's got to the point where I get ZERO results from searches (whichever engine I use) that once provided days worth of reading. When Steve talks about 'smaller sites that put in the leg-work' ceasing to exist, this has been happening for years and has already memory-holed unfathomable amounts of information.
I agree. I've been saying the same for a few years now. Google is gradually getting worse. One of the things that I noticed is that search results that have garbage content but show Google Ads are ranked higher than similar search results that provide better content with no ads. Enshittification.
I'm old enough and remember the problem to find searchresult that was relevant before Google came. But it's getting worse the last few years and I really do want a new search engine to pop up that are like google was 10-20 years ago.
Steve might be tech jesus, but I swear Wendell is some kind of diety. This guy seriously has a complete understanding and a well balanced take on literally everything related to computers. It should not be possible for one person to have that amount of knowledge within the confines of a human life.
I was literally complaining about how crappy google has been just today on several discord servers that I frequent. It is *really* bad. It is almost as bad as Bing at this point
Bing will often entirely misinterpret what you've said and not give you a "did you mean?" option. The amount of times I searched for one thing, only to get something else was getting to 50%. Ended up going back to google will heaps of blocking addons.
At least Bing still has a web cache. Google's been giving me a lot of rotten links to 404s, deleted posts, and feeds with what I was looking for rotated out. The tease is more frustrating than no result at all.
It's gotten so bad now. It straight up shows wrong information now, even easy things like a companies phone number or address. It's become a game of figuring out which key word will generate the search you want it to.
@@truedatrue2744no, considering enshittification can and has occurred in all government types and economic models. It's simply what happens when a society is on the way to the commode.
I definitely think that one possible direction this could lead is people migrating to closed platforms, either small communities like Discord servers or perhaps something like the paid forums Wendell envisioned. It would reduce the amount of spam and bot content for communities, but with none of that information publicly available, it is unclear how people will search for information.
The other issue is, especially with Discord, is finding the information once you find the community. Discord's own search is pretty bad, and you're at the mercy of user curation.
You know, when I first thought about Balkanization in regards to the Internet, I just thought that it would only apply to nation states (ie: Russia and China) and highly competitive fields (Streaming sometimes after Netflix stopped being the only game in town.). Now with everything more or less being restricted to modern day IRCs (Discord) and random forum posts, it's going to be a disaster for anyone who wasn't trained to lurk moar. Even someone like me grew up in the Internet Age almost entirely within Google's existence.
Everytime Wendell said "MapReduce" it makes more sense if he meant "PageRank". Map Reduce is a general purpose multithreading. PageRank was the OG backlink counting search engine ranking monster.
Thank you for highlighting this. These issues are difficult to articulate in a concise way, which suggests to me that many folks don't notice or even care.
What really sucks is that google has some decent tools like the shopping search, but none of the tools besides the venerable web page search actually use the old search modifiers. This means I can't do things like quotes for inclusion or specific phrases or a minus sign for removing garbage results. Also all of the things that don't reapect those rules are at the top of the search page and you have to scroll down to find your actual search (even if you have the sponsored results blocked), so I wouldn't begrudge anyone who thought they just didn't work anymore. I am seriously considering paying for a decent search subscription service because it's become so terrible.
It was actually comforting to hear about the Internet "starting over" with paid user-content sites, seeing the net get so consolidated over the years made me concerned that it'd become stagnant
Throw some quotes around that error you want to search for: Showing results for /not the error you're looking for/ I know Bing used to be known as being better at finding certain things like p rn but it's surprisingly good with normal searches now as well. It makes no sense how Microsoft could have a product that shows potential.
@@Robbie-mw5uu Quite spot on, at least for the things already happened. Not sure about the future where we use local compute to get better search result tho.
It is VERY common to make a product or service worse in almost EVERY field, especially from market owners/leaders. Sometimes it is to reduce costs, but other times, like with Google, its to increase profits. Look at all of the games that have microtransactions, piss off 100% of the player base to milk the 2% of people that will buy that in-game item to make it not as bad. Move in house and partner products to the top of search results even if they're completely unrelated, if nothing more than to boost engagement with those products. Remove physical buttons in cars so that manufacturing can be cheaper by adding a cheap touch bar or screen that doesnt need the wear/failure testing nor the completion of fitting dozens of buttons and wiring them.
The towns the map makers made up are called "paper towns", there is a really cool TED talk about them, where the John Green also talks about a lawsuit concerning one of these, where it turns out that the town had come into existence and had just been named what it said on the map. 🤷🏼♂️
Google's search results have become overrun with ads and sponsored results. Having to immediately scroll down is annoying, and I've been considering swapping to something else.
Tesco does this all the time, they make a product lets say bin liners. Then they "improve" the design, making it thinner which now breaks, then they release an improved version that is essentially the same as the old one but its now more expensive.
I love how comfortable and natural Wendell appeared in this video, as opposed to other channels I’ve seen his guest appearance on recently. Might have just been the other channels editing? Either way I love L1T and GN.
I'm in & out of the tech space, I used to be really into it decades ago, now it's kinda just cool to drop in and catch up every now and again This is the 2nd video today I'm watching Steve and Wendell, and I'm reminded of how much I enjoy every time Steve sits down with somebody for a discussion and I get to be a fly on the wall while the nerds nerd out. Genuinely righteous and I genuinely appreciate the content!
Imagine in a dystopian future, being new to computers and not knowing what websites to visit to find what you're looking for, so you do a google search, and you get ai results with no hyperlinks anymore. You just stay on google and never leave.
I thought it was just me getting older to explain why searching was getting worse. Seems like I’m looking for info and instead get a page of places to buy stuff
Apple does it with Macs and iOS devices, once they get so old, they arbitrarily decide to stop supporting them even though the hardware is still capable enough for a lot of users. Microsoft followed suit with the Windows 11 requirements, which will cause a lot of older PCs to end up in a landfill. OFC some of them will be repurposed as Linux boxes, but a lot of them will be thrown on the dung heap by Joe Consumer who is just tired of nag screens telling him that Windows 10 is EOL and that he should buy a new device.
Wendell create the much needed decentralized search engine we desperately need. If these two got together and had a company creating technology. The magic they would create.
Google has been falling downhill for as long as I remember, but it really fell off a cliff sometime around 2018, when I suddenly noticed I couldn't find the right technical manuals and other "hard data" with one search, the way I used to.
So strange how times change all the time and how unexpected. When google was established, we pretty much saw it as an evolutionary step, the online lexicon for all things. Then pretty suddenly it became commercial garbage. So now where do we go?
We go to what will become very expensive, gatekept, pay in services, that will likely still have ads and info scrapers, just slightly less heavy implementation, because it's the only thing that seems to be working around the quagmire now. It's that, or burn the infrastructure to the bare metal and start over, which would be tantamount to a real world revolution that would likely be crushed almost instantly, for reasons very obvious if you know how things like the petrodollar are propped up, i.e., at the end of a barrel.
I was just about to comment this. Page Rank is what Wendel should be saying. Map Reduce is a big data technique that you might use to implement a Page Rank algorithm
He definitely conflated the two. And they probably were nigh indistinguishable way back in the day. Now Page Rank is (was) more clearly an example of map reduce.
For the last decade or so, Google have been prioritising hiring the wrong people instead of simply hiring engineers. Now they have a huge problem with internal politics.
Dude google was a cia/nsa operation since google was still a white paper at Stanford. It never was a product for the people it was a product for the government. Its literally a weapon that is being used against the people.
I have noticed that when I search for various things it takes me a little longer to actually find what I was looking for, but then some of my seaches were for things that are harder to find. It took me 20 years to find a film that I saw a few minutes of as a kid, but I never knew it's name and it took many attempts of searching for it by changing keywords and sentance structure.
What a coincidence... Just the other day I was wondering about curated link trees that you pay a subscription to be a member of, and everybody thought I was crazy. Crazy together, Wendell!!
RUclips search is ghastly, basically Windows search tier garbage When I have to go to a web browser and search for the Run command to bring up the window I'm looking for, it's pretty fucking sad
@@VITAS874 I don't hope that happens anymore, we've gotten a lot of platforms for short videos and streaming but there's still no decent replacement for this platform
Google has gotten so bad across the board I've found myself migrating to Bing of all things. That one's also garbage, but at least it sometimes gives me the results I want. Same for Android, Gmail, Google's fraud prevention, RUclips. I'm switching everywhere I can because everything is just so much worse. It's a shame. Feels like a forced sudden switch to Linux (which I'm also doing, but more slowly).
I hate that looking up a place no longer has an easy button to open Maps. If I look for Amsterdam it's very very likely I want directions or at least want to check it out from above. Having to find a small 'directions' button or even having to open Maps manually to then search for Amsterdam is just asinine. It used to work perfectly! Do not change that! Adding: Google is getting so bad that I'm selling my Pixel phone in a couple months.
In this day and age, the Internet has become this living sewer that can only bring one solid guarantee. That is, no matter where you step your foot is going to get firmly planted in someone else’s shit.
Worse yet, they went out of their way to disable community driven CC additions a few years back, so we can't even manually fix the problem for each other. RUclips creators themselves have to provide all the CC stuff for their own videos for it to be accurate.
@@theseabass - And since they refuse to noise normalize their ads I can't watch some content on my smart TV. Without good CC I need very loud volume but then absurdly loud ads come on which makes it untenable for people near me. Oh, and smart TVs get twice the ads because FU. Now I just want to put a blackhole on the network so no devices see their ads. And if they continue with their current plan of baked in ads my viewership will plummet further. My minutes spent on content has already been halved. - They are screwing themselves. I was fine with reasonable ads at reasonable volumes. And love long-form content which has many ad breaks. Idiots
Yeah, meanwhile their direct Russian and Chinese competitors Yandex and Baidu; not only have a vastly superior auto captioning and translation engines to Googles crusty old efforts. They also have ai generated auto-dubbing for any video or audio you play in their browsers which works very well. Google is a card carrying asset of the USA federal government, so don't bore me with soggy reddit blurbs, just saying even among it's Intelligence asset peers from rival nations; Google is halfbaked trash.
Years ago I chatted with a product manager at an extremely well known adult entertainment company. He said they have a very unique and interesting problem where they want people to find what they want, but they don't want them to get it too quickly because as soon as they're finished they leave and your potential for revenue stops, but delaying it too much could make a customer leave to go elsewhere. They have to play a fine balance between efficiency and revenue potential, and this seems to be exactly what Google is doing these days as well.
There is a very small town in Wisconsin that was created from people looking at a map and not being able to find the town, then founding a town by that name in that location. The original map maker found out that someone else made a map with the town in it and filed a lawsuit claiming that the other person stole their map. The second person was able to provide proof that the place was real.
When you said MapReduce, were you really referring to the page rank algorithm? I thought MapReduce is more of a database and computing distribution system in Hadoop. So, did you mean page rank calculations were deployed on MapReduce, or that page rank is already obsoleted, replaced by MapReduce? I’ve heard that that page rank still the backbone behind their search engine, but with much more dials, extensions, and functionality. How does MapReduce compliment Pagerank? Sorry, I’m quite outdated.
Google makes money on Ads being CLICKED, not displayed.. They have a Pay Per Click model (PPC). Advertisers place a Bid on how high up on the SERP (Search Engine Result Page) they want to show (Position) for certain keywords/search terms. If an Ad is served and displayed, but no ad is clicked, then no revenue is made. Google will score ads based on quality/relevancy score. The higher the score, the lower the Cost Per Click (CPC) for that ad based on bids.
I am an aspiring content creator just like millions out there trying to make a future for ourselfs. Watching this unfold and seeing the slow switch of the whole Alphabet array of companies from an open, straight forward and grounded in strong values kind of company to a more closed, evasive and sometimes even straight up deceptive company is of major concern to me and I believe for many others also.
Watch our previous video with Wendell here - talks about PCIE as the future! ruclips.net/video/5Fz3P41emo8/видео.html
Find Level1 Techs here! ruclips.net/user/level1techs
Aww, I wanted to be first for once. :)
Whatever you said in this video isn't going to get me to stop using Google products regardless of the crap clickbait title. I say whatever, because I refuse to watch videos with clickbait titles. Stopped only long enough to write this comment. Enjoy!
I miss the actual numbers and data evidence to prove "Google" (the search results) got, quote: "objectively worse".
Usually I think of GN as a fact based channel - this piece is... different. It's like some ate a pizza with glue in it?
I still remember meta crawlers and all that junk, the search results from the past - I haven't noticed any objectively worse results.
In fact I'd never ever want to return to lets say metacrawlers ever again.
What I've been observing is worse content though - largely copied from one and another, not written by expert matters or just someone talking randomly without evidence etc.
Of course that poisons search results. But that's not results being worse, it's just search finding content that's being worse... completely different logic.
@@didamnesia3575 No one said to stop using them. It's not clickbait - it is the subject of the video.
@@GamersNexus This video was a very good dose of severe optimism. I loved it!
What is INSANE to me is that you literally cannot even search RUclips anymore. You enter a search, get like 5 results, and it starts showing me "other videos I may like" and my sub feed
Sometimes I would search some very specific problem and someone on the 3rd page described the solution in some 100 view video. Now the search algorithm is absolute garbage.
If you search for something controversial or political sometimes there will be only 3-4 totally unrelated videos. Even if you have the exact video title you sometimes must force to view only channels and search the exact channel manually.
We just get fed the results on youtube some people that also released gemini AI want us to see.
site:youtube producing _completely different results_ than RUclips's internal search has always baffled me.
Change the sort by to 'date added' or something to get the full search result. At least for now anyway
This.
Yeah and the average age of the 5 results is 7 years ago. So Anti-Intelligence.
lol. The expected result of having to instaban bots in a video where we talk about them. It's becoming self-aware!
They'll be back and in greater numbers
It`s beginning to believe!
@@InternetStranger476 Sandpeople, lol
Does reporting them help you clean them up? Or am I wasting my time
Status indicator: Ominously Red.
15 years ago I could find almost anything I wanted on Google. All I get now are poorly written articles from AI that are completely irrelevant and useless.
Copywriters and journalists have clogged up the Internet too. There's a lot of recycled and bloated content to trawl through
There was one specific study/article I found years ago on some chemical reaction that was EXACTLY what I needed for an argument at the time
Can I find it now? Nope, doesn't exist. Pages and pages of irrelevant garbage.
Use bing
DDG*
@@minakatahizuru Microsoft is worthless AND evil.
Google gives you “millions of results”, but you can only go back 30 pages, and each page is just a repeat of results from the first page
welcome to the future gang 🗣
It also change your search without letting you know it. You can turn tell me to use precisely the word you searched for. It will still change that search in the background and if it is too precise simply return no results. In the trillions of websites on the internet no matter what words you type there are legitimate sites with exactly those words. Get Google does not allow you to see then
Yes. Modern Google is trash. 100% not organic. After paid ads you get some 8 results max, the rest is AMP trash and then... silence, where did them millions of results go?
Exactly. And this seems to be relatively new behavior.
Google is erasing the internet to save money 😅
Public internet is dead.
In the past everything was done publicly-facing on forums boards etc. Corporations and the influencer type of content and manipulation of the medium is and has pushed communities to more private spaces like discord servers and such.
Now, the publicly easy access internet is all influencer and corpo bullshit.
I think greedy and evil people finally get that places to make as what google and company's it is. Thats why its become garbage
Now go donate some money to gimli. I'm sure that'll make things better.
if you dont believe it. go on, open a private browsing window. try to surf the web like you used to, dont log into or create any accounts. its useless and irritating. it fucking sucks. internet used to be so much fun.
Discord is shit too. Hope it gets abandoned like Skype soon.
Not only that but all the internet traffic is funneled through a few servers, like Amazon and Facebook servers.
"Reddit doesn't tolerate nonsense." Reddit is pure, distilled, unadulterated nonsense.
As with any social media, there's good and bad info and leaving it for an AI to decide is the worst possible decision.
and Reddot is over-moderated to the point of being sterile. It's impossible to post critical comments on any major subreddit in my experience and questioning either the moderation or the mods will get you banned permanently. There's no warnings, no temp bans and they will ban all connected accounts. Appeals are ignored, there is no communication nor any accountability.
I find Reddit extremely useful. This simplistic way of thinking where you take only the bad and make out something is purely that one thing is just another example of disingenious behaviour. I get you likely get some kind of satisfaction from making this kind of negative comment, but it's just not reality based.
@@TheycallmeMrWonka how old are you? The internet was actually useful before reddit and to this day i never get anything technical from reddit.
Social media seems to have a penchant for nonsense! We should train our AI assistant on it!
Google's biggest AI letdown for me has been the map directions. I travel almost constantly for work, and up until around the start of 2024, Google Maps had some of the best spoken directions available. I could easily navigate through unfamiliar cities without having to look away from the road. Right around the new year, that abruptly changed, with the directions becoming downright nonsensical, going from reading out street names to "Take the ramp", which usually means go straight, except when it doesn't. I quickly caught on to the fact that Maps was using AI to read signs from the Street View data that had been collected, and trying to directly convey that into verbal directions. Utter failure, and it's nearly gotten me into several accidents when I had to look away from the road in order to figure out what nonsense Maps was telling me to do. It's bad enough that I'm seriously shopping for a dedicated GPS navigation unit, because I can't trust Google's directions anymore.
Oh, the AI maps are nonsense. They can't do roundabouts, for example. It's broken.
I just look at the route now.
I've seen even worse, just a few weeks ago Maps tried to steer us down some road that didn't even exist. Bad GPS or whatever. But the fact that Apple Maps got us everywhere perfectly fine, is a statement in and of itself. They started out in 2012 but now have the prettier, more reliable and more up-to-date maps.
On a trip back from the eclipse I kept taking wrong turns on interchanges, cuz I could swore she said to take the turn or exit, but then she'd reroute and I kept wondering how I was mishearing multiple times. Glad to know it wasn't just me. It worked just fine last year while traveling :/
Google maps and Apple maps have swapped places. I used to love google and hate apple maps. But lately my google directions have been letting me down on accuracy, verbiage and ease of viewing. Apple still is not great, but has over taken google with it's back slide into mediocrity.
I'd recommend waze. It works great in Europe at the very least.
They abandoned the old motto “don’t be evil”… I wonder why.
Because money and control
What if they bring it back, but they just drop one of the words? Like an efficiency upgrade. "Google: Be Evil." Has a ring to it.
@@GamersNexus I also like "Don't be" - Google
According to Wikipedia, they did not. Between April 21st and May 4th of 2018, the motto was removed from the code of conduct's preface and retained in its last sentence.
The fact they needed that motto in the first place means they were never good people.
I've put exact video titles into the RUclips search, word for word, and the search results absolutely refuse to give me what I want. It's not until you put the exact title and the channel's name in the search that they give in and give you what you want. It's absolutely ridiculous!
🤔google owning youtube perhaps? Which they do.
Literally just finished removing google home as it slowly became unusable , removed google chrome from my windows install a few weeks back ....... and now ive migrated to linux with absolutely nothing chromium based.
if only we had some sort of group of people who were supposed to protect the interests of regular people to stop them being abused by massive companies .......
if only that group of people wasn't so old that their brains have evaporated
They abuse us because the masses allow it. Any system that is put in place to stop it will also be corrupted, again enabled the masses' indifference. Then you'll just end up with another layer of bureaucratic nonsense. The only way to solve the problem is to let the problem correct itself, which occurs in cycles. I'll let you use your imagination as to what that means.
I’ve found Brave to be fabulous.
@@robmcd brave is chrome based
@@robmcdBrave, although good, still uses the Chromium base internet engine.
I love when I try to look up a tutorial on youtube and half the results are random videos I watched 2 months ago 👺
If anyone else liked this comment like I did you are part of the problem, the AI must think this is good.
A good way to get someone to click a video is to change the topic entirely
Google search has been getting steadily worse for several years, but lately I've seen a larger number of people starting to notice.
Shit's genuinely useless now. What do people go to now? Bing? I wanted Duckduckgo to be good, but it just isn't most of the time.
Brave. It’s miles in front of google and bing and equally if not more private than ducksuckgo. Plus the AI feature built in is pretty helpful most of the time.
Most people just don't understand. Or maybe even care.
@@RUclipsTookMyNickname.WhyNot Its really nothing new, youtube has been getting worse for like 15 years at this point. But it is nice that people become much more conscious of it.
Like back in the day searching on youtube had a level of utility thats just not there anymore. As long as you dont really, really like Qora...
@@pirojfmifhghek566 I've been using Bing more and more because of the more straightforward approach and them actually surfacing results Google chooses to bury for some reason or another. Plus, copilot is extremely handy, especially in helping me to do my job dealing with SharePoint, power automate, and power apps, etc. It's been pretty invaluable, actually. Google and Gemini, not so much lol.
Wendell always being top tier guest in Gamer Nexus.
I would listen to this guy talk about anything, he just seems like such an authority when he speaks.
Is that the same Wendell from those tec syndikate videos back in the day?
@@tehgzizlauw1787Yep. Level 1 Techs formed when Tek Syndicate imploded.
@GamersNexus Tell Wendell I think Google is just about to drive itself off a cliff, grasping and making increasingly poor decisions along the way.
He's a great source of info regarding Linux and hardware
I remember when companies made the best products they could and were proud to stand over their products.
cause they had competition
@@itsmeagain7246 And they relied on reputation to exist, instead of marketing and manipulation and other people excusing away the gaslighting and other abuses by saying it's normal and "every company does it", which is false and a pathetic excuse if it was true, and by blaming the victims for using products.
@@stylis666 Yes and no. There are A LOT of components to this machine and not all apply to every company. One that does apply to big companies is the "too big to fail". they have all the money to do whatever they want without fear of accountability (think farma) or too many people rely on them to work for the economy to stay stable (think banks).
@@moonkey537 Yip! And thank you for emphasising that combination inherent/intrinsic to _to big to fail_ and not feeling any/much responsibility! I personally focus so much on the fact that companies are run by abstract ideals stemming from benefits/motivations of shareholders, and are an entity on their(the company's impersonal) own that I sometimes forget to look at other aspects of those entities/companies.
They used to try and impress consumers. Now they just try to impress shareholders (billionaires). Everything wrong with our economy boils down to how rampant our wealth inequality is and how much we cater everything to seeking the money of ultra wealthy people.
It's the inevitable result of an economy that does nothing to try and prevent wealth inequality.
I like how Google removed the 'don't be evil' part from their code of conduct, so they could finally position themselves more broadly.
Planned obsolescence and data obfuscation in software is one terror I did not expect to face in my lifetime.
Huh? IBM started that decades ago well before the Internet. It’s not a new business model in software.
both always existed
good people rarely imagine how evil other people can be. but once marketing gets ahold of something...
Lightbulb conspiracy….
Darwin: hold my cancer
One of Google's problems is severe shortsightedness.
"Oops this isn't profitable by the second quarter. Axe it!"
or
"I don't care if this is the future, it will take 6 years to build. No"
the result of letting shareholders completely dictate your business
All Google had to do to court trust in Stadia was let customers walk with their games like Geforce Now. If Google had done that, people would've given Stadia a chance.
The podcast Better Offline did a good series on why this happened. Hint: the management consultant mindset
@@davidmalkowski7850but they couldn’t. Their tech didn’t allow it. They needed bespoke games. It was a platform.
I understand that you can argue they could have used proton, because their tech was based on Linux. But it’s kind of a big pivoting move to make on an architecture that wasn’t built with that in mind. They probably didn’t want to sink more money into it.
But what do I know. 😂
Cheers.
Their only problem is the woke agenda... child grooming should be illegal...
"Replacing the Engineer CEO with an Accounting CEO..."
*Focus on the Intel logo*
Yeah, spit the truth!!!
Where?
@@NoobsDeSroobs 8:22
@@AscalonFI77 Nice!
The thing I love most about Pat "Pat" Gelsinger is that he is a certified *nerd,* having literally _written the book_ on the 80386 processor. Lisa Su has similar _bona fides._ Is it any wonder that we've got the best processor competition we've had in a decade?
@@GSBarlev Definitely a big improvement to Gelsinger from the run of accountants.
It was Page Rank, not MapReduce. MapReduce is just a generic algorithm used to processing big amounts of data. But other then that Wendell's description of how Page Rank worked is good enough.
Seems like he meant both at different points.
This was bugging me the whole video.
A lot of people noticed this 7-8 years ago and were mocked and told "it's not happening, that's a conspiracy theory." Now we're in the "is it happening? here's why it might be happening" stage. The next stage is, "OK so it's happening, and here's why that's a GOOD thing!" The problem has nothing to do with them needing to make more money, and they know exactly what they are doing, and so does the state department, but no one is willing to talk about that either.
It's weird isn't it?
People know the power of informational control, and yet they think it isn't happening. Call it a conspiracy theory. And act surprised years later...
smooth brain
I remember when google would reverse image search and pull up the actual source of the image even if it was hidden on a darknet page (unfindable without direct link)
Then they totally gutted it along with the search engine. You cant even add " " for keywords to find anything of meaning anymore.
I miss the old web and landlines
Or - to remove a term
I noticed that too. A few years ago, doing a reverse image search was very reliable. But now it never produces any results when you select "Show Image Source".
Images from "unvetted" sites may contain a vague glimpse of a 17 year old's thigh. Google is protecting our children. You know, all the ones they drive into depression and self-harm with their social media and news feeds.
You're right. Back then you would get the exact picture and it was also able to find and identity parts in the image and find that. Nowadays you get random crap, or just basic images that have literally zero to do with the source image you uploaded. Like oh yeah this weird shaped steel pipe is what is in the source image, which was something that didn't even contain the shape in the first place.
Back when, if you put a picture of some not quite global celebrity you forgot the name of Google would find that person more often than not, or at least it would be among the results. Nowadays you are lucky if the results are of the same gender or even skin color (which is merely to say, they are not even remotely close).
from darknetpage? wtf are you talking about?
I also think ads have lost their value at this point they have infiltrated everything and become nothing but noise.
For real. When was the last time an ad made you MORE likely to buy a product?
Remember when they laundered mobile ads in with "TrueView" ad buys? Johnson & Johnson remembers.
either that or get summarily blocked by the tech savyy
Definitely, I honestly don't mind 20-30 seconds long ads, but the minute they are over 1 minute, I'll refresh and refresh or not bother, the ads I am forced to watch I'll mute and do something else
I remember the good old days of TV ads that were fun, creative, even edgy, and you'd remember every single one, now ads are just noise like you say.
@@4.0.4eco flow ad did 😂
I did ask Copilot, "Are you evil," to which it said, "I'm a tool". Got that right.
That made me chuckle. 😂
Good answer, truthful and short.
Wait... yet another example of how AI is becoming... self-aware 😂
@@GinkoYoki234 Quite the opposite. It's the most clueless unaware statement ever.
@@DavideDavini Except it's no joke.
I think when wendell says "map reduce", he meant PageRank - map reduce is a way of distributing computation, pagerank/backrub was what they used to evaluate page worthiness via backlinks etc
Anything with Wendell is going to be solid. Love that you two have teamed up in recent years.
Absolutely, it's worse. I used to be able to find almost ANYTHING I wanted to by using old school search terms. Now to find good, COMPLETE information on what I need, I usually end up on Page 2 or even 3.
Noticed this as well, usually got what I wanted from the first page even though my search might have been a bit obscure but with the right terms in there it would return great results. That does not really happen anymore.
Lucky you can find anything at all.
In 2018ish I had to abandon Google because 4/5 of my searches didn't get anything relevant in the first 20+ pages.
Yes, I was going through 20 pages of results, then refining the search, then 20 more pages, then refining results.
It couldn't even give me results for pages that I had bookmarked when I found them on Google 2 years prior.
If a quoted paragraph pasted into the search bar can't be found when I add site:TheSiteI'mSearchingFor then it's clearly trying it's hardest NOT for give me a result.
You only have to go to page two or three? Lucky. I'm stuck just giving up or bookmarking anything I think I mind want or need again.
Who on earth wants to deal with that, seriously? I find immediate and great information using ChatGPT. I use it whenever possible, because the response is just so much more convenient. "Googling" something is WORK. And it gets more and more tedious work.
I'm not sure if it's the case on Google since I stopped using it for search years ago, but I have noticed that some search engines just stop giving results past like page 6.
I did map software for a certain large atlas company. Not only did they inject false information into every map we had to make sure that new false information was injected into every digital map created from their data (following a format they could easily prove was theirs). That would allow them to prove that any map taken from their system and used by someone else was stolen. It was a significant part of the programming for the SW.
That's been a thing for a long time: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trap_street
also like the dbrand/casetify skins case, quite blatant!
Also "paper towns"
Are you the reason why my truck onboard nav system is unusable on certain trips and I have to drive fully manual again instead of assisted? If the you should just disobey your orders because it makes us truck drivers miserable.
@@beenbr7803 Are you setting your destination to nonexistent, unreachable locations, which is what I inserted into maps? Then no, I have nothing to do with why your GPS nav system is failing.
Google: "We have all the data on Earth, to make the best AI model ever"
Also Google: "We think you'd like Elmer's glue on your pizza."
I think its trying to tell us something 🚼🍼
It does add thickness though.
But without it all my toppings would fall off.
To be fair, all current AI models still haven't reach AGI capabilities despite what their corporal representatives claim.
@@aladdin8623 AGI? We don't even have I in the AI.
“I’ll LLM it” with LLM as a verb is wild to me. Quickly going to lead to lots of LLM-ings. Lemmings, so to speak.
google isnt interested in serving data, their vested interest is keeping their users constrained within their ecosystem for as long as possible to harvest detailed user data...in order to aggregate, collate, and sell that data. the only reason their various softwares work *at all* is to bring users into that ecosystem, regardless of (or sometimes despite) functionality.
That's pretty much why (in the west) Google, and Apple are pretty much the only choices for phone OS.
Throw Microsoft in and likely over 90% of all modern tech stuff is under one of 3 umbrellas.
@@volvo09 ... but Linux. 😏
Are you saying that Google and Apple were the same company all along?
@@falsemcnuggethope No, because Apple does not sell your data. They are actually the opposite.
@@uclajd hahaha a bot with a sense of humor, now that's good AI !
Google used to be engineering driven. Now it's driven by marketing people. It used to be important to do cool stuff that solved people's problems. Now money is all that matters. Thanks Ruth.
This is the same story with every tech company. The creators are innovative, ambitious, and driven... but to grow they need capital, so they get investors. Investors are typically only interested in the profit and as they gain more and more control, the direction of the company is shifted. This is especially true when a company is publicly traded, they have a fiduciary responsibility to make money for their investors.
I wish there was a solution to this, where a tech company could grow AND stay true to its origins.
@@tames307 I should point out there's no law that says they have a fiduciary responsibility to make money for their investors.
@@xpyrrulings in court equals law. It was ruled in court.
Not marketing people. But by finance bros.
@@flinchy-5224 it's called case law. Still don't think there is such. That's the risks of investments. You might have mistaken it with contracted terms and conditions if any or shareholder dividends. Mismanagement and clear disregard of best interests of the company is something else entirely.
The Google search has been terrible for almost a decade by now. In ~2010 the search was absolutely amazing, but nowadays it's utter trash.
I think years ago (pre llm) they switched to indexing in an embedded semantics. This is sorta the early deep learning for natural language processing era. This made power user phrasing adjustment much harder because similar searches projected back to the same embedding. As a dumb example around 2018 I was searching for repair videos for my dodge dakota truck. RUclips gave me videos for ford rangers. Its "smart" in that both are similar, small trucks but they are totally useless and search doesnt care because they are similar semantically.
Yeah, I alsp regard 2011 as the best year and declining ever since. It has some to do with the rise of social media and declining of forums and other decadent sites. In the past ~5 years it has gotten atrocious though. You search, and it searches for something completely else!
Wendell looks so much healthier each year. Good for him. Also, love these colabs, should try and do them more often!
EXCELLENT conversation. Thank you for putting words to what I think we're all experiencing. Unfortunately, I don't know that I heard too many solutions. But at least you all identified the problems.
Google is just the Shopping network now. That's all it's really good for. To find real information you have to have actual knowledge and then include those details in the search prompt.
Somehow even that tab is bad. I get a lot of sketchy sellers there.
It is not even good for that. Try for example finding memory when you know the exact product number you need, you get a load of other random stuff that is of no use to you, including fake SD cards.
@@katrinabryce just like Amazon's search.
I've gone back to books.
@@katrinabryce Try finding an unknown phone number and getting links to web sites where the number you are looking for isn't on the web page.
Waiting to see the recursive nature of LLMs generating search results about Google's LLM search results lol
It's already happened. The Elmer's Glue result was still the top answer to how to thicken pizza sauce after their moratorium ended-only this time it was referencing the coverage of the initial fail.
It’s going to increase hallucinations and bias
AI companies are already inventing prion disease for nascent AI.
Myself, I'm looking forward to the half-insane AIs eating each other and giving themselves Kuru.
"the precursor to Gemini was duo"LOL no , duo was a video call app like Apple's FaceTime which became an even shittier product called "meet"
What he meant to say was duplex
But still not the precursor to Gemini that was bard.
Where did you find this 🫏🤡
Nobody will talk about the real 🐘 in the room.
The one with the oversized trunk and undersized hat.🕎 Ruined the Internet,there I said it
Google results quality fell off a cliff when they removed the "+" operator in 2011 and the "~" operator in 2013.
It's been tumbling downhill ever since. The LLM/"AI" adoption is just the next cliff.
At least you can still quote a word to require it to be in the result. It works the same as +.
Bro fell of meme 🤔
@@phizc You can, but they've removed its usefulness. It used to be case-sensitive, for example.
No wonder that crap doesn’t work anymore 🤦🏻♂️
First they came for the boolean operators, and/or I did not speak out--because I was not a boolean operator.
2024: google that sh*t!
2034: lol did you google that sh*t?!
2044: what is google?
I love you guys chatting - always so incredibly insightful. Wendell is an incredibly connected and forward looking guy, I love hearing his opinions on where things are headed.
I was noticing poor results on google today. I’ve already been ignoring the stupid AI stuff that is way too simplistic but this time I was searching for what coolant to put in my tractor and it said it couldn’t find good results. So it suggested that I instead search for things like “what does coolant do” 🤬
Same thing here. Over time I come across that page more and more. Where the simplest possible search just brings up nothing
Two things I want to mention, is that yeah, reddit has trolls and also bots that has infiltrated it and they make new accounts and cross post the same old posts for drama or engagement.
And the second thing, is that its ironic that google is using reddit's data because I find that the best way to search for something on google is to add the word "reddit" at the end of your query so you get usable results
I agree with this. I think Reddit is largely more useful than other social media. It does have a lot of downsides as all social media does but if I've had multiple tech related extremely specific issues that only had answers on Reddit. There can be good advice on there but yeah, it's normally the more niche communities that are useful. I'm not sure why it tends to get shit on more than other social media. Yeah there can be terrible advice but it's not just trolls and bots. It's much more useful than Facebook, Twitter, Discord or Tumblr.
Unironically. I pretty much append reddit to my search results every time I get some useless seo spam article "what silicone to use for bathrooms" oops "what silicone to use for bathrooms reddit"
I use the reddit suffix for the best results re: gaming searches.
Reddit is a pale shell of itself. The slightest disent in any subreddit results in Bans by moderators without explaining what rule you violated. For instance Energy is rather Anti Nuclear but this is not in the rules. I was muted for three days for even asking why mentioning that Diablo Canyon geneates up to 8.6% of CAs power. There's no recourse. Say anything negative about a Tesla regardless of how many you own and your banned from all of the tesla groups by a automoderator which is appropriate as Musk says they're a AI company, not a car company.
At least reddit does not require login
7:54 I think Wendell is describing PageRank, but calling it "MapReduce". MapReduce, when not talking about a specific software implementation, describes a much more general approach of doing "Map and reduce" at a large scale.
I think he's talking about the 2004 paper MapReduce: Simplified Data Processing on Large Clusters... I dunno if RUclips will flag me as a bot for linking to it, but: static.googleusercontent.com/media/research.google.com/en//archive/mapreduce-osdi04.pdf
Yeah I was like, "wait what???"
A couple of things worth noting here:
- Wendell says the AI companies "haven't really come up with a solution to the hallucination issue" - they won't. They can't. Hallucinations are a direct product of how LLMs and generative AI works - because they don't understand concepts like "true", "real", or "made up". Their fundamental function is to produce a statistically likely output of what a response to your query might look like, based on their dataset. They have absolutely no ability to stop hallucinating, because *every answer* is one - it's just that some data is actually present in the data, so they can come closer to a correct answer as there's more concrete data to work from.
- It's not just google making the Web worse, it's also the proliferation of AI generated, AI translated garbage - which they touch on, but also pretty much entirely bypass the issues around save for Google's failure to respond to it/inadvertent enabling of it.
What were seeing is the enshittification of the web, and Cory Doctorow covers this far better than Steve and Wendell, unfortunately.
Also, it bears mentioning that there's a rather shocking level of naivete on display concerning corporate logic (and greed). Google isn't asleep at the helm in terms of not filtering AI trash on RUclips - they *want it there*. Because in the short term, it makes them money, as people having to go through a dozen shitty videos before finding what they want lets them serve you more ads. Yes, this will kill the platform if left alone, but they only care about the short term. That's what corporate logic is. It's the same for every single other corporate platform owner out there. Again: enshittification. Please, Steve and Wendell, go Google that word 😉
If you think corporate logic is short term gain at the expense of long term feasibility, you are ignorant enough that I can safely ignore everything else you have to say. You are just cynical and confusing it for wisdom.
They wouldn't get good results from googling it; it's enshitiffied
@@tuhaggis Man, have you paid attention to literally anything corporations have done in, oh, say the past 30 years? The "holding companies" buying out successful businesses, running them into the ground through "cost cutting" and selling off the parts of the carcass? The whole "move fast and break things" attitude? The persistent and pervasive prioritisation of short term profits (and shareholder dividends) rather than long term stability and viability? The consistent attempts at skirting or breaking literally any regulation or law if it boosts profits short term, even if it leads to massive fines or tarnishing their brand? The tech giants desperately going after literally every possible buzzword bubble, even if it leads to oberproduction and exaggerates boom-bust cycles? If you think the average corporation has any interests beyond short term profits, you're buying into corporate propaganda, and that kind of naivete... well, I'd say the same right back at you, nothing else you're going to say is likely to be worth listening to. There's absolutely nothing cynical about my approach. Heck, I'd eager I probably have more hope and faith in humanity than you do. But corporations are literally legally obligated to produce short term profits for their shareholders. And they've been acting accordingly for decades and decades. Expecting them to continue doing so is realistic, not cynical.
I am no subject expert - but could'nt you train a highly specific model to rate things ? Like this is a preference thing, this is objectively better than something else, this is a fact, this is not and inject them into other AI Models that create content, like the most common ones that create a fluid and responsive text output for an end user ?
@@DxCBuG it would be just as prone to hallucinations, ratings for things that have good data for would be decently accurate, while ratings for everything else would be just hallucinated garbage
When he says map reduce, I think he means page rank. Google doesn't use page rank anymore, but when it did it returned hyper relevant results. You used to be able to immediately find anything even on obscure forums. These days you can't find anything anywhere, even with an exact text search.
Here's how Google let me down: They took out community subtitles. I used to watch a bunch of videos from overseas and it was GREAT when there was a dedicated community that just wanted more people to see the video.Then they removed it for AI generated subtitling and it was/is pretty bad and I lost track of a bunch of channels as a result.
Agreed, the move doesn't make sense. Apparently, uploaders can't upload their own translations
@@verygoodbrother Pretty sure they can. I see a lot of japanese music videos with proper english subtitles.
They also removed the ability to pull up cached versions of results, too. I used that more often than the link itself.
@@agentmith Helps to skirt work firewalls
@@verygoodbrother eh only at first, enterprise content filters have archive/cached results blocks now.
What is being discussed in the video is the direct, logical outcome of the corporate model of the internet winning over the free and open source model in the 1990s. To imagine a version of the internet - without ad model, without toxic social media model, without sensationalism-driven clickbait headline model, without attention-seeking profit-driven zero-value video model, etc, etc - that could have been realised if the alternative had won, is just a recipe for depression.
And that's why I'm here saying "burn it to the ground". I'm a Luddite. But no, not the "Destroy all tech ever no matter what" luddite. That's a strawman created by those who wish to see me cease existing.
For me being a luddite means "If the tech doesn't serve everyone equally, burn it/break it/tear it down" and you can guess how that works out these days what with a megacorp being the sole provider of anything you can think of without getting too specific these days.
Point is, the stuff they're providing serves themselves primarily, and the user or consumer purely secondarily.
The cart's before the horse. Tech should serve it's operator first, and if it's owner is different, it's owner second, and if it's creator is different, it's creator last. And right now everything's inverted. Tech serves it's operator last right now. So it needs to burn.
It is depressing to think about, although I can't imagine an alternative world where this free internet you describe prevails over the corporate internet. Money makes the world go round and pays the bills. I wish it wasn't the case, but it is.
@@44R0Ndin Yeah that's about right. Luddite's motto was "destroy tech that I disagree with", not "destroy all tech".
Corporations always add layers upon layers of complexity to hide malfeasance, you see it in insurance, investment, banking, etc... anywhere to attempt to profit for providing nothing.
the "open source model" wasn't a model and wasn't competing with anything. Corpos came in and just replicated the same thing that works in the real world, because that's what makes them money. Newspapers were often "clickbait" opinionated trash even back in the day. None of those things are even remotely new
yes. google hss become shite and the AI suggestions in browsers now are dumb.
normal people can't find shit and anyone who can effectively search is like a tech guru for their friends and family
The sponsored results already made me leave Google years ago.
Google has simultaneously secured my tech job for years to come, yet also ruined it because the 5% of people who used to solve their own issues...using _Google_ ... can no longer find solutions.
Even if you do know how to search there are still problems for example anything even remotely political/historical feels *heavily* filtered.
I feel like there's some sort of 'controversialness' rating that your search gets that dictates how wide of a net your results are. Anything it deems controversial gets constrained to mainstream media sources. Slightly less controversial and you might get a wikipedia article, or reddit post. Not controversial at all and you start getting access to more independent material.
Ive tried searching some stuff regarding WW2 before and it was a nightmare to find anything.
Ah, that sweet, sweet job security. Got to love it.
@@pagatryx5451 The two big engines, Google and Bing have been filtering, curating and outright censoring increasingly heavily year on year, and the 'independent' engines are really only meta-searches of the big two anyway. It's got to the point where I get ZERO results from searches (whichever engine I use) that once provided days worth of reading. When Steve talks about 'smaller sites that put in the leg-work' ceasing to exist, this has been happening for years and has already memory-holed unfathomable amounts of information.
I agree. I've been saying the same for a few years now. Google is gradually getting worse. One of the things that I noticed is that search results that have garbage content but show Google Ads are ranked higher than similar search results that provide better content with no ads. Enshittification.
I'm old enough and remember the problem to find searchresult that was relevant before Google came.
But it's getting worse the last few years and I really do want a new search engine to pop up that are like google was 10-20 years ago.
Steve might be tech jesus, but I swear Wendell is some kind of diety. This guy seriously has a complete understanding and a well balanced take on literally everything related to computers. It should not be possible for one person to have that amount of knowledge within the confines of a human life.
If we are sticking with religious names, I vote Wajih. It implies prominence and honor. Or Wani, meaning a gift or precious offering.
We have tech god and tech jesus.
when you've lived as long as i have....
He is legit a Usernet Sage from the prior age.
Truly, Wendell is like the Wendell of technological knowledge.
I was literally complaining about how crappy google has been just today on several discord servers that I frequent. It is *really* bad. It is almost as bad as Bing at this point
Bing will often entirely misinterpret what you've said and not give you a "did you mean?" option. The amount of times I searched for one thing, only to get something else was getting to 50%. Ended up going back to google will heaps of blocking addons.
Interesting you mention the Discord complaints. I bet the loss of forums as crawlable media has contributed!
At least Bing still has a web cache. Google's been giving me a lot of rotten links to 404s, deleted posts, and feeds with what I was looking for rotated out. The tease is more frustrating than no result at all.
@@celeriumlerium8266 Well, at this point I would be happy if the rate was 50% on Google side.
It's gotten so bad now. It straight up shows wrong information now, even easy things like a companies phone number or address. It's become a game of figuring out which key word will generate the search you want it to.
There is already a term for it: Enshittification
Nope. The correct term is Capitalism.
@@truedatrue2744no. Thats the cause
@@truedatrue2744 sure bud
@@truedatrue2744no, considering enshittification can and has occurred in all government types and economic models. It's simply what happens when a society is on the way to the commode.
@@GeeMannni swear some people are worse than even most major llms at interpreting stuff...
I can't express how much I appreciate Steve's chats with both Wendell and Gordon. They're always outstanding, informative and entertaining.
Wendell is awesome. So much experience and knowledge and really good at breaking complex concepts down and explaining them.
I definitely think that one possible direction this could lead is people migrating to closed platforms, either small communities like Discord servers or perhaps something like the paid forums Wendell envisioned. It would reduce the amount of spam and bot content for communities, but with none of that information publicly available, it is unclear how people will search for information.
The other issue is, especially with Discord, is finding the information once you find the community. Discord's own search is pretty bad, and you're at the mercy of user curation.
You know, when I first thought about Balkanization in regards to the Internet, I just thought that it would only apply to nation states (ie: Russia and China) and highly competitive fields (Streaming sometimes after Netflix stopped being the only game in town.). Now with everything more or less being restricted to modern day IRCs (Discord) and random forum posts, it's going to be a disaster for anyone who wasn't trained to lurk moar. Even someone like me grew up in the Internet Age almost entirely within Google's existence.
Everytime Wendell said "MapReduce" it makes more sense if he meant "PageRank". Map Reduce is a general purpose multithreading. PageRank was the OG backlink counting search engine ranking monster.
Send data to multiple machines or cores run a program for each piece of data, then reduce it to one result.
I've been following Wendell for a long time and am continually amazed when you get him firing on all cylinders. Just wow.
Thank you for highlighting this. These issues are difficult to articulate in a concise way, which suggests to me that many folks don't notice or even care.
What really sucks is that google has some decent tools like the shopping search, but none of the tools besides the venerable web page search actually use the old search modifiers. This means I can't do things like quotes for inclusion or specific phrases or a minus sign for removing garbage results. Also all of the things that don't reapect those rules are at the top of the search page and you have to scroll down to find your actual search (even if you have the sponsored results blocked), so I wouldn't begrudge anyone who thought they just didn't work anymore.
I am seriously considering paying for a decent search subscription service because it's become so terrible.
It was actually comforting to hear about the Internet "starting over" with paid user-content sites, seeing the net get so consolidated over the years made me concerned that it'd become stagnant
Corporate control of the internet is forcing the Dead Internet theory into reality
I worry it will be handled by NFT and digital coin people, thus causing their own problems.
wht i noticed recently is it stopped showing similar actually searched stuff, it will just invent "similar" search terms.
Throw some quotes around that error you want to search for:
Showing results for /not the error you're looking for/
I know Bing used to be known as being better at finding certain things like p rn but it's surprisingly good with normal searches now as well. It makes no sense how Microsoft could have a product that shows potential.
Similiar? Nah, it has been searching for something totally else for like 5 years...
Wendell is such a smart dude. I could listen to him ramble about anything all day.
Is he actually intelligent if all he is talking about is just hearsay since he doesn't work for Google?
@@Robbie-mw5uu Quite spot on, at least for the things already happened. Not sure about the future where we use local compute to get better search result tho.
@@Robbie-mw5uu I think you mean "speculation", not hearsay. Very little of what he is saying is speculation.
It is VERY common to make a product or service worse in almost EVERY field, especially from market owners/leaders.
Sometimes it is to reduce costs, but other times, like with Google, its to increase profits.
Look at all of the games that have microtransactions, piss off 100% of the player base to milk the 2% of people that will buy that in-game item to make it not as bad.
Move in house and partner products to the top of search results even if they're completely unrelated, if nothing more than to boost engagement with those products.
Remove physical buttons in cars so that manufacturing can be cheaper by adding a cheap touch bar or screen that doesnt need the wear/failure testing nor the completion of fitting dozens of buttons and wiring them.
That sly dig at intel at 8.30 was the chefs kiss
More discussions with the two of you going over current tech issues - we need this "real talk"!
The towns the map makers made up are called "paper towns", there is a really cool TED talk about them, where the John Green also talks about a lawsuit concerning one of these, where it turns out that the town had come into existence and had just been named what it said on the map. 🤷🏼♂️
Google's search results have become overrun with ads and sponsored results. Having to immediately scroll down is annoying, and I've been considering swapping to something else.
That won’t change how websites just spam with ai articles
I already did. Google search is totally ruined. Nobody should use it.
Most of the other "engines" actually use google search as their base... So you're not really going anywhere.
Tesco does this all the time, they make a product lets say bin liners. Then they "improve" the design, making it thinner which now breaks, then they release an improved version that is essentially the same as the old one but its now more expensive.
Using more material costs more. Coders have a very difficult time with this basic concept because they only have to type it out once...
When Google removed the ability to use proper search operators it all started going downhill.
I love how comfortable and natural Wendell appeared in this video, as opposed to other channels I’ve seen his guest appearance on recently. Might have just been the other channels editing? Either way I love L1T and GN.
8:23 Gotta love that zoom in on the intel logo
I have noticed Google search getting worse, taking longer, and results that are just plain wrong.
I'm in & out of the tech space, I used to be really into it decades ago, now it's kinda just cool to drop in and catch up every now and again
This is the 2nd video today I'm watching Steve and Wendell, and I'm reminded of how much I enjoy every time Steve sits down with somebody for a discussion and I get to be a fly on the wall while the nerds nerd out. Genuinely righteous and I genuinely appreciate the content!
Imagine in a dystopian future, being new to computers and not knowing what websites to visit to find what you're looking for, so you do a google search, and you get ai results with no hyperlinks anymore. You just stay on google and never leave.
I thought it was just me getting older to explain why searching was getting worse. Seems like I’m looking for info and instead get a page of places to buy stuff
Don't forget their abandoning perfectly functional Chromebooks and creating e-waste.
Apple is just like that. Expensive e waste
Are you talking about chromebooks that are old enough to not receive security updates or what?
@@falsemcnuggethope Obviously he is.
They extended the update period on that issue.
Apple does it with Macs and iOS devices, once they get so old, they arbitrarily decide to stop supporting them even though the hardware is still capable enough for a lot of users. Microsoft followed suit with the Windows 11 requirements, which will cause a lot of older PCs to end up in a landfill. OFC some of them will be repurposed as Linux boxes, but a lot of them will be thrown on the dung heap by Joe Consumer who is just tired of nag screens telling him that Windows 10 is EOL and that he should buy a new device.
Using non-Google search engines to find RUclips videos because they'll be more relevant is an experience.
DuckDuckGo is not any better and Bing is average at best. Using any search engine today is painful. I miss finding information with keywords.
Bing is the only non Google search.
Wendell create the much needed decentralized search engine we desperately need.
If these two got together and had a company creating technology. The magic they would create.
Google has been falling downhill for as long as I remember, but it really fell off a cliff sometime around 2018, when I suddenly noticed I couldn't find the right technical manuals and other "hard data" with one search, the way I used to.
Trump derangement syndrome carries a lot of extra baggage for any company. Google spends it days censoring anyone right of Mao nowadays.
So strange how times change all the time and how unexpected. When google was established, we pretty much saw it as an evolutionary step, the online lexicon for all things. Then pretty suddenly it became commercial garbage. So now where do we go?
Dystopia. Or worse
People don't wanna think this days.
We go to what will become very expensive, gatekept, pay in services, that will likely still have ads and info scrapers, just slightly less heavy implementation, because it's the only thing that seems to be working around the quagmire now.
It's that, or burn the infrastructure to the bare metal and start over, which would be tantamount to a real world revolution that would likely be crushed almost instantly, for reasons very obvious if you know how things like the petrodollar are propped up, i.e., at the end of a barrel.
When Wendell keeps saying MapReduce, does he actually mean PageRank?
(obviously both are pretty key to early Google, but PageRank is the one which seems to bear more relevance here imo)
I was just about to comment this. Page Rank is what Wendel should be saying. Map Reduce is a big data technique that you might use to implement a Page Rank algorithm
PageRank is one of the coolest algorithms. It's taught in Intro to Linear Algebra courses, and for good reason.
He definitely conflated the two. And they probably were nigh indistinguishable way back in the day. Now Page Rank is (was) more clearly an example of map reduce.
Whatever Google's deal has been lately is getting bad, whether it's how You Tube is functioning or the crap they're changing for worse.
For the last decade or so, Google have been prioritising hiring the wrong people instead of simply hiring engineers. Now they have a huge problem with internal politics.
Dude google was a cia/nsa operation since google was still a white paper at Stanford. It never was a product for the people it was a product for the government. Its literally a weapon that is being used against the people.
Wrong people ?
@@HellGatefr2 yes. Overpaid marketing teams, PR thugs, HR muppets, and generally employees that don't contribute to what made Google great.
@@HellGatefr2 yes, marketing teams, PR contractors, HR departments, and others that generally don't actually contribute to a better product.
I have noticed that when I search for various things it takes me a little longer to actually find what I was looking for, but then some of my seaches were for things that are harder to find. It took me 20 years to find a film that I saw a few minutes of as a kid, but I never knew it's name and it took many attempts of searching for it by changing keywords and sentance structure.
What a coincidence... Just the other day I was wondering about curated link trees that you pay a subscription to be a member of, and everybody thought I was crazy. Crazy together, Wendell!!
RUclips search is also gone to shit and Its going to be that way for as long as they have such a big following
you tube started to aggressively censor comments in the past few weeks too.
RUclips search is ghastly, basically Windows search tier garbage
When I have to go to a web browser and search for the Run command to bring up the window I'm looking for, it's pretty fucking sad
But what annoys me the most is that they took this step on purpose
If people said f youtube and boycott him or create alternative, all will be better.
@@VITAS874 I don't hope that happens anymore, we've gotten a lot of platforms for short videos and streaming but there's still no decent replacement for this platform
LMAO the zoom in on the intel logo at 8:25 🤣🤣🤣
Google has gotten so bad across the board I've found myself migrating to Bing of all things. That one's also garbage, but at least it sometimes gives me the results I want.
Same for Android, Gmail, Google's fraud prevention, RUclips. I'm switching everywhere I can because everything is just so much worse.
It's a shame. Feels like a forced sudden switch to Linux (which I'm also doing, but more slowly).
I hate that looking up a place no longer has an easy button to open Maps. If I look for Amsterdam it's very very likely I want directions or at least want to check it out from above. Having to find a small 'directions' button or even having to open Maps manually to then search for Amsterdam is just asinine.
It used to work perfectly! Do not change that!
Adding: Google is getting so bad that I'm selling my Pixel phone in a couple months.
Google "AI" stands for "Always Impeding" one's search for answers/products
In this day and age, the Internet has become this living sewer that can only bring one solid guarantee. That is, no matter where you step your foot is going to get firmly planted in someone else’s shit.
They don't even have working automatic closed captioning after 20 years.
Worse yet, they went out of their way to disable community driven CC additions a few years back, so we can't even manually fix the problem for each other. RUclips creators themselves have to provide all the CC stuff for their own videos for it to be accurate.
@@theseabass - And since they refuse to noise normalize their ads I can't watch some content on my smart TV. Without good CC I need very loud volume but then absurdly loud ads come on which makes it untenable for people near me. Oh, and smart TVs get twice the ads because FU. Now I just want to put a blackhole on the network so no devices see their ads. And if they continue with their current plan of baked in ads my viewership will plummet further. My minutes spent on content has already been halved. - They are screwing themselves. I was fine with reasonable ads at reasonable volumes. And love long-form content which has many ad breaks. Idiots
Yeah, meanwhile their direct Russian and Chinese competitors Yandex and Baidu; not only have a vastly superior auto captioning and translation engines to Googles crusty old efforts. They also have ai generated auto-dubbing for any video or audio you play in their browsers which works very well. Google is a card carrying asset of the USA federal government, so don't bore me with soggy reddit blurbs, just saying even among it's Intelligence asset peers from rival nations; Google is halfbaked trash.
Years ago I chatted with a product manager at an extremely well known adult entertainment company. He said they have a very unique and interesting problem where they want people to find what they want, but they don't want them to get it too quickly because as soon as they're finished they leave and your potential for revenue stops, but delaying it too much could make a customer leave to go elsewhere. They have to play a fine balance between efficiency and revenue potential, and this seems to be exactly what Google is doing these days as well.
There is a very small town in Wisconsin that was created from people looking at a map and not being able to find the town, then founding a town by that name in that location. The original map maker found out that someone else made a map with the town in it and filed a lawsuit claiming that the other person stole their map. The second person was able to provide proof that the place was real.
WENDELL!! This is a match made in heaven
When you said MapReduce, were you really referring to the page rank algorithm? I thought MapReduce is more of a database and computing distribution system in Hadoop. So, did you mean page rank calculations were deployed on MapReduce, or that page rank is already obsoleted, replaced by MapReduce? I’ve heard that that page rank still the backbone behind their search engine, but with much more dials, extensions, and functionality.
How does MapReduce compliment Pagerank? Sorry, I’m quite outdated.
Google makes money on Ads being CLICKED, not displayed.. They have a Pay Per Click model (PPC). Advertisers place a Bid on how high up on the SERP (Search Engine Result Page) they want to show (Position) for certain keywords/search terms. If an Ad is served and displayed, but no ad is clicked, then no revenue is made. Google will score ads based on quality/relevancy score. The higher the score, the lower the Cost Per Click (CPC) for that ad based on bids.
I am an aspiring content creator just like millions out there trying to make a future for ourselfs. Watching this unfold and seeing the slow switch of the whole Alphabet array of companies from an open, straight forward and grounded in strong values kind of company to a more closed, evasive and sometimes even straight up deceptive company is of major concern to me and I believe for many others also.
I'm all for more "Is [insert name] Screwed?" Co-op episodes on whatever you decide is relevant. Thanks Steve!