Reminds me of that British officer in the Second Boer War who I believe said something along the line that the Boer soldiers were rude for attacking at breakfast time
- Sees the guy next to him pink mist and fall - Can’t see who’s shooting - Stands there and stares while sitting still and trying to find something to shoot Crazy and sad how often this stuff happened because it was just kids fighting.
@@JacobC479lots of kids who hoped they missed every shot in every major war, although I’ve not seen it talked about in anything recent. Especially after 9-11 we became very ready to go for the heart, or so it seems to me
You'd be surprised my friend. More modern muzzleloaders are about the same as those old Springfield were. I know there were others but the Springfield rifle musket was the most common. I shot an original from the range owners son among other awesome relics but once I got over the fear of the damn thing blowing up in my face I could get a chest shot within 2" of the center and one shot nipping the center out of 6 shots. Like I said the first 2 or 3 shots I wasn't worth a damn out of fear.
Did my research and found i had family in the North that fought for the South, and Family in the South that fought for the North. Crazy times that world must have been.
I had family that fought under Lee cause they served with him in the Mexican American war. Also we lived right on the Union’s war path and didn’t trust the Irish recruits not to raid their home town, which they were right. Union marauders were a big issue targeting civilians. But we fought, we lost, and moved on with our lives later serving in future wars for God and Country.
This occurred by the Tennessee River at Lansing Landing. Grant made camp there to drill new recruits while waiting for Buell's Ohio troops before marching south to seize the CSA major railroad junction at Cornith, Mississippi. Confederate Albert Johnston was aware of that after reaching Nashville so began marshalling his troops in Cornith to attack Grant before the Ohio reinforcements arrived. Johnston had planned on marching the 22 miles in one day until unusually heavy rainfall turned it into a 3 day march. The rebels arrived with empty bread sacks due to eating all their rations during the march. They also couldn't be resupplied due to their supply train being 3 days behind due to the deep mud. Johnston's forces made camp 4 miles south of Grant's forward camps were both sides' pickets fired at each other during the evening. This clip shows one of 3 Rebel corps launching s surprise attack at sunrise on green Union recruits. The Union troops abandoned their camps while withdrawing to the rear to set up defensive lines with the reinforcements being rushed in. The 3 corps provided them with the time to do that by stopping to eat what the new recruits had cooking for breakfast and by ransacking their tents and supply wagons of anything that was edible. They stopped after more troops arrived to attack the Union positions. Johnston is shot in a leg leading one assault to die 3 hours later from blood loss. General PT Beauregard assumes command and withdraws the troops from the fighting to make camp for the night after assuming that the Union forces had been beaten. The Ohio troops arrived that night with Grant announcing they'll launch a couter attack in the morning. Grant is aware of the CSA forces lack of provisions and ammunition from inspecting the dead Rebels bread bags and ammunition pouches. Grant's attacks in the morning forced the Rebels to give ground until Beauregard orders a general withdrawal back to Cornith. Grant's forces stay in persuit until being surprised by Bedford Forrest's Rebel calvary. The Union troops fought off the calvary then retreated back to Lansing Landing. The CSA made camp at Cornith where they lost a large number of troops to cholera and dysentery.
Interesting thanks for sharing. Imagine how bad of a beating the union would have taken if the southern troops had been as well equipped and fed as their northern counterparts.... Logistics won the war, just as it did ww2 80yrs later.
Confederates had one of the best sharpshooters back then. And the very thing of sharpshooting was invented by them - they used their best shooters to take down Union officers from afar to wreak havoc and chaos among Union troops
To be fair a lot of the early successes were a result of total incompetent Union leadership. Which I suppose is underestimating them in a way, but nobody really knew how incompetent these generals were until the war started
@Mr_Shtoporenko British used similar tactics 50 years earlier against France in Peninsular War, specifically 95th Rifles regiment. Most of their troops still used smoothbore ofc so only certain units. Other armies of the period had similar Jaeger battalions.
That's why no one invades us. The rest of the world was watching us and to some extent helping one side or the other because they wanted to get territories here in America that they had lost. Looking at you England and France. Anywhatsit, we were so good at killing each other that the rest of the world was like: "yo that shit is wild." When you start hearing the trees whistling "Dixie" .... You best run son. Rebel yellin is soon to follow.
That's the rebel yell It has been recorded on phonograph to still be able to be heard to this day This is when you hollar back louder No sense in dying tired and nit taking some down with you in their mowing of your position when you hear that It's no mercy, no quarter from a southerner
It was scary as shit too, this clip actually underplayed it, IRL it'd be thousands making the scream, basically the Stuka scream of the ACW. Imagine minding your own business way and completely behind where the action is supposed to be. Then one morning a whole Confederate corps comes right at you out of the woods from the opposite direction of where they're even feasibly supposed to show up, after a night's forced march. Not fun!
I always forget that the US civil war ended 1 year prior to the austro prussian war. So seeing poweder pan muskets/rifels (please someone tell me the correct term) confused me at first but then I remembered that prussia was among the first to use breech loading rifles using precursors to modern shells in a large military operation.
Primary rifles of both sides used percussion caps, but many units used more advanced weapons like the Sharps rifle, Winchester repeaters, etc. some men on both sides had high quality weaponry but neither side had the funding to equip whole armies with the cutting edge stuff.
@@StayRadDontDie11B I want to say Shiloh because it took place in a heavily wooded area the confederate’s took the Union by surprise. And the general they showed I think may have been Sherman who was grazed by a bullet in the first couple of minutes.
The Union Infantry rallied against a complete surprise attack with Grant off the field and won the battle. Also, most of the Confederate infantry stopped their advance to loot and pillage the camps, had poor discipline and failed to maintain the pressure. The Union Army didn’t bludgeon the Confederates with industry and manpower; man for man they won the war. Maybe one exception would be Cavalry.
@@23rdMS_Inf brother, your name is a Confederate infantry regiment. I think you may be a little biased. One thing I’ll give the rebs is their cavalry. Only thing of significance Union cavalry did that I can think of is Grierson’s Raid; that’s it. The boys in gray and butternut definitely understood how to use cavalry in modern war better than the Union, and their accomplishments are endless. Forrest won battle after battle in raids in which he was outnumbered. JEB Stuart neutralized Union cavalry superiority in weapons and numbers and even went beyond that with his scouting ability.
@lukesmith1003 more union soldiers died and lost most of the war with like 4 general changes. The battle of Gettysburg was a battle of luck and experienced. One commander needed to follow an order correctly and the south would've been at white house door steps. Don't be ignorant just cause you don't wanna admit the south was way better than the union, who pillaged and raped especially with sherman was attacking.
Okay, no Gettysburg surpassed Shiloh considerably. Antietam was the bloodiest day in American history but not the battle with the highest casualty rate. The Civil War remains the bloodiest war in American history. The Battle at Shiloh was a considerable strategic loss for the Confederacy and the bloodiest battle up to that point. But literally nothing you said was true. Shiloh had a grand total of 23,000 casualties if we include both sides. The Mexican American War roughly 15,000 Americans died in total. (That's still a mind boggling statistic.) But that would mean over the course of several other conflicts, the Revolution, the Barbary States, the War of 1812, and several wars with the native American Tribes we only lost 7,999 troops? Incorrect and unlikely.
My father's side fought for the Tennessee regiment's and orphan brigades (Paducah Kentucky regiment CSA) my mother's side fought for the Alabama and Mississippi regiments.
This is the First day of the Battle of Shiloh in 1862,the Confederates Ambushed a regiment Union troops,and massacred them,those who survived fought in the rest of the Battle,many of those who died had actually only just gotten their field gear less than 24 hours prior,despite this,the Union did win a victory. This is the Battle that first put Ulysses Grant and William Sherman on the American radar as competent generals,and it was the first of the Battles(and campaigns)that now cause many to call Grant a butcher,which to be fair it was a grindhouse,but not because of just Grant,the reason many of the significant battles of the Civil War were considered brutal was because the Civil war was a time where war was changing,repeating rifles were replacing Muskets,artillery began to get an upgrade,and tactics were slowly shifting from Napoleonic style lines of men facing each other-type battles,to proto-WW1,deeply entrenched,war of attrition,where one side slowly outfoxes the other,the Civil war was the last of the Old wars,General Lee was the last of the old generals,but at the same time it was the first of the new wars,and General Grant was the first of the new Generals
Shiloh, Grant's biggest defeat, covered up by the timely arrival of Don Carlos Buell's Army of the Ohio at the end of the day on April 6, 62. Most of the Union troops fighting the next day were Buell's and so the defeat of the Confederates on April 7 was due to his army. Grant took credit for the victory by Buell's men, but everyone knew the truth! Grant's troops also blamed him for their defeat on April 6. Grant's failure to prepare any adequate defences or to do proper recon of his forward lines was criminal negligence.
The "show" is a docuseries entitled "Grant". It is based on Ron Chernow's biography of Ulysses S. Grant. What you are watching is the beginning of Albert Sidney Johnston's surprise attack at Shiloh.
The représentation here is a bit extreme. In fact, the idea of Shiloh being an absolute surprise for soldiers and high command is, or at leat, could be, an exageration. If you take testimonies from some soldiers and officers before the battle, they knew the confederates were gathering nerby and even informed their superiors, specialy Sherman about a potential attack. But Sherman ignored it, so did Grant. The reason is that they thought Johnston was still more to the south, and they did not imagine that he would take the fight to them. But from the soldiers point o view, many of them knew. Because the scouts had regular skirmishes with southern units, frequently reported to headquarters without answer. Some soldiers, pursuing a patrol in tbe area even found a part of the confederate camp, again, without any reaction of headquarters. This leading to one thing. When the confederates prepared their attack, it seems that at least a portion of the army of Tennessee knew it, and prepared for it. And in the first morning of the battle, it was not the attack itsef that surprised the Union, but its violence. The fact is that no such fights had been seen in the war so far, so even if the soldiers were technicaly prepared, they were not "ready", psychologicaly speaking. But they still were waiting for the rebs to come. I get those informations from the book "Nothing but Victory, The army of the Tennessee, 1861-1865" where testimonies are quoted, for those who would like to see ;) The idea that it was such a surprise that soldiers were killed with bayonets in their sleep is a myth. Mostly carried by journalists, and it's important to say that no journalist witnessed the battle of Shiloh. At the end, the idea of the surprise attack was a better option for Grant and Sherman, rather than admitting that they had the possibility to prevent the panic of the first day, but didn't, out of miscalculation of the situation. Anyway, Grant will later state, and he is right about that, that intrenchments and defensive works were not a thing at this state of the war, and such practices would not appear until a few months after Shiloh. So there is not much that could have been done to prevent the attack, if not maybe a better organisation of the camp and troups and a better system of alarm.
Grant was caught completely by surprise here without buell arriving when he did Grant would be remembered forca collasal failure. Funny how things work out
My Hubby Shamus Grandfather was here! Boston..Irish Briage. . The 69th of the 69th fighting to save this country! Barb ..Krakow..Polski!....love you Jesus! ! I MARRIED a Ultra Irish Hubby Sha'mus O'Donnell From DONEGAL Ireland...we are so tired of people walking over us!
I have ancestors from Donegal. Their last name is Gallaher. Shortened from O'Golliher or something like that. Came to America around 1760, then some moved to Mississippi around 1840. One died at the Battle of the Wilderness fighting under A.P. Hill.
Mi tatarabuelo lucho para la unión al final de la guerra se estableció en California donde contó a mi abuelo como fue esa guerra al final mi abuelo regresó a México pero antes de morir me habló de esto y todo lo que vivió mi tatarabuelo 😢
Did some research.. a relative emigrated to the US. His son fought in Normandy against a relative on the German side.. same beach .. sometimes fate is toxic Both survived ! Now I have relatives in France .. as the American was wounded and met a French nurse
Where's the Yankee Officer of the Watch? The Sergeant of the Sentries? Corporal of the Watch? Sentry posts? And this is why you never underestimate your foes. Especially in his backyard!
Fun Fact: The Confederate Army was made up of slightly better shooters than their Union counterparts. However, the Union had numbers and mass production.
I have not seen this movie before, but because the union guys are being attacked and their tents I know it is Jackson's last battle. He's the one who set up being able to hit them so by surprise in the flank that he caught them in their tents. Unfortunately about a half hour later he was accidentally killed play a Confederate who mystic him and the party of officers accompanying him for Union cavalry. And by the way, Jackson was not only opposed to slavery, he had illegally started a school for slaves in Virginia.
James Robertson wrote about Jackson's view on slavery: "Jackson neither apologized for nor spoke in favor of the practice of slavery. He probably opposed the institution. Yet in his mind the Creator had sanctioned slavery, and man had no moral right to challenge its existence. The good Christian slaveholder was one who treated his servants fairly and humanely at all times."
@@ronbanks1541 No, you are correct - and do you know why he did it? (Sunday school) "should be given to the colored children, believing that it was more important and useful to put the strong hand of the Gospel under the ignorant African race, to lift them up"
I have several relatives who fought for the Union States to free the slaves… 4 men died and others got wounded. One person was an 11 year old boy who was a drummer boy for a New York infantry regiment. He died in 1942; my dad knew him when he was a kid. Today when I think of the civil war, I think to myself- what did those guys fight and die for. They would had been better off staying put on their farms
Are we just gonna forget that the Emancipation Proclomation came as a result of the Civil War? One of the most powerful documents in our country? We freed slaves in this country people, why are we coming to the conclusion that the Civil was was pointless?
Wouldnt have chamged the outcome. Simply couldnt compete from a logistical sense. Confederacy knew they were on a timer. How long before they finally ran out of men and arms? All the tactical genius in the world cant save you from a a lack of supply and manpower. Logistics is everything.
How did Stonewall Jackson perform at the Seven Days battles? Or at Fredericksburg? And also, the reason he was killed was not just a coincidence; he wanted to destroy the Union at Chancellorsville and pushed, and pushed despite his divisional commanders clearly knowing his men had done all he could. He goes out to scout Union positions for an ill-advised attack in the evening, and got shot by his own men because he was between lines. The same “push and push” stuff is exactly why the Confederates, despite winning that battle, lost like 10,000 men that they could not replace. It was a great victory considering the numbers and he probably had to do it, but actions have consequences. I get the sense that if Jackson was at Gettysburg, he would’ve endorsed Pickett’s Charge.
The south was an economic textile powerhouse and didnt want to pay the federal taxes they felt werent deserved. But the massive economic prosperity was built on the backs of thousands of enslaved africans.
Keeping the union together was more important. If we were just a union of states, we would've easily been divided by foreign powers in later wars. Imagine if China wooed Texas to fight the East Coast
Read the Cornerstone Speech, slavery was absolutely the main reason for breaking away from the Union. And sure, regular dudes didn't own slaves, but many supported slavery because they thought black people were less than human and should be subjugated instead of an equal part of society.
The history of our country is wild to me… yeah other great nations around the world have history that dates back 10x farther than the U.S. but our up bringing to where we are today was like no other…
Yep, the U.S was brought up by constant war but that doesn’t make us any different to who we were 150 years ago And they only way Americans will lose a war is either by politics or by civil war, and manly because our military behavior is nothing the likes any other seen over their country’s military history
It actually is like many others in some regards and in some regards it's very special but for all the wrong reasons like the genocide of the natives in the 19th century or the civil war fought purely over slavery is fucking insane.
Yeah, they are exaggerating a bit. Sherman was under fire for most of the day without getting wounded, Grant somewhat less so as he moved around the battlefield.
They’re exaggerating the accuracy because the amount of fire would’ve been a lot higher in reality. They shorted on actors and you can tell, the number of attackers would’ve been much higher than what was displayed. There were brigades leading the attacks into the camps, not companies like this makes it look
Delaware made slavery illegal in 1901. Almost 30yrs after the civil war ended. How was the war about ending slavery again? Whyd delaware keep them for so long?
Like it or not, the abolition of slavery is the primary reason listed in the articles of secession for why the confederacy wanted to separate themselves from the US. You can cope and cry all you want, but facts don’t care about your feelings. Now I would for sure agree with you that the abolishment of slavery isn’t the ONLY reason the southern states succeeded, but it is objectively the primary reason. The South said so themselves.
Hey, the Southern states themselves said it was about slavery, and I will take their word for it. Its all over their constitutions and declarations of secession.
@@johncorrall1739 And the fact that they were slaver assholes at a time when slavery had been banned in most of the Western world by about 1805. Fighting to assert our right to govern ourselves vs fighting to keep a corrupt, morally repugnant practice alive in order to make profit is very different.
People who fought for the South were not fighting for slavery but fighting against a centralised authority in Washington DC. Those who wanted slavery were the agrarian aristocracy, not the average working man.
@@alexcordero6672neither did the North. It was about money for them. That’s why they offered the Corwin Amendment which would have made slavery essentially inviolate. Not a single Southern politician voted for it.
@@davidpadilla9613 They were fighting for freedom from the north for state self-determination. Slavery still existed in a few Union states like Kentucky and Missouri. Only 25% of Confederates owned slaves
@@JimJam8008 How is that hate speech? The guy is just paraphrasing the age old "History is written by the victors" statement. That's why Iran, Iraq, Libya etc. are all horrific countries that violated every human right and want the rest of the world dead - because America won.
@@MrAdamchristopher2sorry your teachers were not lost cause myth believers. Too bad that they told you the truth and not daughters of the confederacy myths
There is so much wrong from this scene I find it offensive. First, when you're hit with a musket you aren't "pulled backward" using invisible thread. Nor do they go straight through 75-year-old pines. Second, they're not all fucking marksmen. The grays are firing like they've got WWII sniper scopes. And why did they only fire one shot at one sentry to start the battle if they were going to fire into the camp anyway? You just rake the whole place with an opening volley. Third, he's screaming "left" and pointing to his right. Finally, and I cannot stress this enough, why is the general and his cadre assembled while everyone is asleep? And since they are asleep, why aren't their muskets loaded? At least three guys take a knee to load their weapon as the sentry ran through the tents. This thing is a mess.
![BLACK BAG - Official Trailer [HD] - Only in Theaters March 14](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Du0Xp8WX_7I/mqdefault.jpg)
Grant Miniseries by History on Amazon Prime Video.
I have no idea what the guy running is saying please correct me thank you
They are coming from the left..
I believe he's saying *Rebs! We got it from the left! Rebs!"
What is the Name from this movie?
@@guggym3021 read op's comment, you incompetent retardius!
REBSSSSS!!!!!!!!
Finally, a civil war film with true realistic carnage.
Me encanta cuando se matan entre ellos
Ever seen the Petersburg crater?
I wouldn't say realistic when people are being blown off their feet
@@RubenVelarde-y1fawful thing to love.
What do you think about Glory?
I hate getting a full frontal assault before I’ve had my coffee….
It's just inconsiderate really, messes with your whole day....
Buddy, if I had a dollar for every time I’ve said the same damn thing…
Reminds me of that British officer in the Second Boer War who I believe said something along the line that the Boer soldiers were rude for attacking at breakfast time
And still in underwear
I always preferred that to coffee. Wakes me right up. Eh, different strokes.
- Sees the guy next to him pink mist and fall
- Can’t see who’s shooting
- Stands there and stares while sitting still and trying to find something to shoot
Crazy and sad how often this stuff happened because it was just kids fighting.
It was a genocide disguised as a war
You've never been in combat have you
@@grahamblaine3242 neither were a majority of the people sent into the Civil War, that was kind of my point.
@@JacobC479lots of kids who hoped they missed every shot in every major war, although I’ve not seen it talked about in anything recent. Especially after 9-11 we became very ready to go for the heart, or so it seems to me
@TheRealRusDaddy sadly, it was not. The North's great blunder was being overly merciful to the Southern slaver traitors
"They couldn't hit an elephant at this dist-"
Dead federal corps commander at SHARPSBURG, I BELIEVE.. MANSFIELD, wasn't it?
No, Edwin Sumner, old BULL OF THE WOODS HIMSELF..
@@PhillipBrown-q9talso wrong. It was John Sedgwick at the battle of Spotsylvania Courthouse
It was a Whitworth rifle. Very expensive, a bugger to load but accurate as f*ck
You'd be surprised my friend. More modern muzzleloaders are about the same as those old Springfield were. I know there were others but the Springfield rifle musket was the most common. I shot an original from the range owners son among other awesome relics but once I got over the fear of the damn thing blowing up in my face I could get a chest shot within 2" of the center and one shot nipping the center out of 6 shots. Like I said the first 2 or 3 shots I wasn't worth a damn out of fear.
Did my research and found i had family in the North that fought for the South, and Family in the South that fought for the North. Crazy times that world must have been.
I had family that fought under Lee cause they served with him in the Mexican American war. Also we lived right on the Union’s war path and didn’t trust the Irish recruits not to raid their home town, which they were right. Union marauders were a big issue targeting civilians.
But we fought, we lost, and moved on with our lives later serving in future wars for God and Country.
@@Southern_Crusaderdamn Irish
So what are hillbillies if not irish@@kevinoleary7970
I had Great great uncles that fought, one for the North and one for the South but at the end they were both buried in the same cemetery
Imagine how crazy this next Civil War is going to be. Get ready cause it's right around the corner, free people Vs. marxist oppressors. Can't wait.
This occurred by the Tennessee River at Lansing Landing. Grant made camp there to drill new recruits while waiting for Buell's Ohio troops before marching south to seize the CSA major railroad junction at Cornith, Mississippi. Confederate Albert Johnston was aware of that after reaching Nashville so began marshalling his troops in Cornith to attack Grant before the Ohio reinforcements arrived. Johnston had planned on marching the 22 miles in one day until unusually heavy rainfall turned it into a 3 day march. The rebels arrived with empty bread sacks due to eating all their rations during the march. They also couldn't be resupplied due to their supply train being 3 days behind due to the deep mud. Johnston's forces made camp 4 miles south of Grant's forward camps were both sides' pickets fired at each other during the evening. This clip shows one of 3 Rebel corps launching s surprise attack at sunrise on green Union recruits. The Union troops abandoned their camps while withdrawing to the rear to set up defensive lines with the reinforcements being rushed in. The 3 corps provided them with the time to do that by stopping to eat what the new recruits had cooking for breakfast and by ransacking their tents and supply wagons of anything that was edible. They stopped after more troops arrived to attack the Union positions. Johnston is shot in a leg leading one assault to die 3 hours later from blood loss. General PT Beauregard assumes command and withdraws the troops from the fighting to make camp for the night after assuming that the Union forces had been beaten. The Ohio troops arrived that night with Grant announcing they'll launch a couter attack in the morning. Grant is aware of the CSA forces lack of provisions and ammunition from inspecting the dead Rebels bread bags and ammunition pouches. Grant's attacks in the morning forced the Rebels to give ground until Beauregard orders a general withdrawal back to Cornith. Grant's forces stay in persuit until being surprised by Bedford Forrest's Rebel calvary. The Union troops fought off the calvary then retreated back to Lansing Landing. The CSA made camp at Cornith where they lost a large number of troops to cholera and dysentery.
Interesting thanks for sharing.
Imagine how bad of a beating the union would have taken if the southern troops had been as well equipped and fed as their northern counterparts.... Logistics won the war, just as it did ww2 80yrs later.
Not to mention Union Navy gun boats fired on the Confederate troops all night.
Is this supposed to be Shiloh? Wasn’t it Pittsburgh Landing they camped at prior to driving toward Corinth?
Great explanation thank you very much
Que aula em?! 👏👏👏👏
That dude literally woke up dead
How the hell do you wake up dead?!
@@thegiesenguide4802 Cause' you're alive when you go to sleep
@@mryrius so you telling me you can go to bed dead, and wake up alive?!
@@thegiesenguide4802of course you can, you just saw it i suppose
@@sigiLiBamba ruclips.net/video/Jr_nhywjNHM/видео.htmlsi=2YKV_N_13WRzhzn1
Its actually insane how good the confederates were doing at the start of the war. The north completely underestimated them
Confederates had one of the best sharpshooters back then. And the very thing of sharpshooting was invented by them - they used their best shooters to take down Union officers from afar to wreak havoc and chaos among Union troops
To be fair a lot of the early successes were a result of total incompetent Union leadership. Which I suppose is underestimating them in a way, but nobody really knew how incompetent these generals were until the war started
@Mr_Shtoporenko British used similar tactics 50 years earlier against France in Peninsular War, specifically 95th Rifles regiment. Most of their troops still used smoothbore ofc so only certain units. Other armies of the period had similar Jaeger battalions.
The confederates also had a good portion of the top American generals on their side
And then they lost
Them yee yee sounds coming out the forest sounds scary as shit
That's why no one invades us.
The rest of the world was watching us and to some extent helping one side or the other because they wanted to get territories here in America that they had lost. Looking at you England and France.
Anywhatsit, we were so good at killing each other that the rest of the world was like: "yo that shit is wild."
When you start hearing the trees whistling "Dixie" ....
You best run son. Rebel yellin is soon to follow.
That's the rebel yell
It has been recorded on phonograph to still be able to be heard to this day
This is when you hollar back louder
No sense in dying tired and nit taking some down with you in their mowing of your position when you hear that
It's no mercy, no quarter from a southerner
@@Язепс 😭 that’s some damn good logic back then or in any frontal assault tbh
@@Язепсdamn straight
It was scary as shit too, this clip actually underplayed it, IRL it'd be thousands making the scream, basically the Stuka scream of the ACW.
Imagine minding your own business way and completely behind where the action is supposed to be.
Then one morning a whole Confederate corps comes right at you out of the woods from the opposite direction of where they're even feasibly supposed to show up, after a night's forced march.
Not fun!
The minié ball was no joke
That's because it was no ball...
They were 52 and 58 calibers
The Sharps cartridges were dead serious
@@hoppinggnomethe4154 I have 2 left one a union and one a confederate.. my great great uncles were confederate soldier's
@@9and7 why do you say stuff knowing you’re wrong
I always forget that the US civil war ended 1 year prior to the austro prussian war. So seeing poweder pan muskets/rifels (please someone tell me the correct term) confused me at first but then I remembered that prussia was among the first to use breech loading rifles using precursors to modern shells in a large military operation.
By the end of the war americans where using Remington rifles. They just where not Mas produced yet
Primary rifles of both sides used percussion caps, but many units used more advanced weapons like the Sharps rifle, Winchester repeaters, etc. some men on both sides had high quality weaponry but neither side had the funding to equip whole armies with the cutting edge stuff.
They were either muskets or they had switched to rifled muzzle loaders. Idk what battle this is
Primarily both sides used Caplocks, but for obvious reasons some confederate regiments still used flintlocks.
@@StayRadDontDie11B I want to say Shiloh because it took place in a heavily wooded area the confederate’s took the Union by surprise. And the general they showed I think may have been Sherman who was grazed by a bullet in the first couple of minutes.
I forget where the quote came from but it is true to an extent
'If i had the confederate infantry and the union artillery i could win every war"
The Union Infantry rallied against a complete surprise attack with Grant off the field and won the battle.
Also, most of the Confederate infantry stopped their advance to loot and pillage the camps, had poor discipline and failed to maintain the pressure.
The Union Army didn’t bludgeon the Confederates with industry and manpower; man for man they won the war. Maybe one exception would be Cavalry.
@@lukesmith1003 put the crack pipe down.
@@23rdMS_Inf brother, your name is a Confederate infantry regiment. I think you may be a little biased.
One thing I’ll give the rebs is their cavalry. Only thing of significance Union cavalry did that I can think of is Grierson’s Raid; that’s it.
The boys in gray and butternut definitely understood how to use cavalry in modern war better than the Union, and their accomplishments are endless.
Forrest won battle after battle in raids in which he was outnumbered. JEB Stuart neutralized Union cavalry superiority in weapons and numbers and even went beyond that with his scouting ability.
That doesn't make any sense at all. Who would be fighting. You rounded up both sides and put them together.
@lukesmith1003 more union soldiers died and lost most of the war with like 4 general changes. The battle of Gettysburg was a battle of luck and experienced. One commander needed to follow an order correctly and the south would've been at white house door steps. Don't be ignorant just cause you don't wanna admit the south was way better than the union, who pillaged and raped especially with sherman was attacking.
Sherman and Grant got surprised.
The rebs knew buells army was advancing from Nashville, so they had to strike before he could join with Grant
And still managed to hold out and win
Sure.
With the help of BUELLS ARMY OF35,000 FRESH SOLDIERS
@@PhillipBrown-q9t South started a war, they wouldn’t win.
@@markhankins3023 Buell advanced on Pittsburgh landing is FACT..what are you referring to?
Name of series is "Grant"
More American casualties at Shiloh than in all other previous wars combined.
Okay, no Gettysburg surpassed Shiloh considerably. Antietam was the bloodiest day in American history but not the battle with the highest casualty rate. The Civil War remains the bloodiest war in American history. The Battle at Shiloh was a considerable strategic loss for the Confederacy and the bloodiest battle up to that point. But literally nothing you said was true. Shiloh had a grand total of 23,000 casualties if we include both sides. The Mexican American War roughly 15,000 Americans died in total. (That's still a mind boggling statistic.) But that would mean over the course of several other conflicts, the Revolution, the Barbary States, the War of 1812, and several wars with the native American Tribes we only lost 7,999 troops? Incorrect and unlikely.
@MoldyOog the bloodiest war in American history was the King Philips war. 30% of Americans were killed in the war.
@@MoldyOogmy great grandfather ×3 was wounded at Antietam with the 27th North Carolina survived the war and passed in 1896 at age 57.
You need to study history better. All the casualties in the civil war combined were greater than all the other wars .
Up until that time, YES..
Sherman at SHILOH..."MY GOD, WE ARE ATTACKED!" HARDEES CORPS, 9,000 STRONG, THE FIRST OFF 3 WAVES OF CONFEDERATES. HARDEE, BRAGG, BISHOP POLK..
In the words of the confederate armies second in command, PIERRE GUSTAV TOUTANT BEAUREGARD, the REBEL advance reminded him of "AN ALPINE AVALANCHE"
Fort Polk Where soldiers go to play at tiger land
Breckenridge with two divisions in reserve..
@@GABSTER13BI think that the Army recently changed Fort Polk along with Benning, Stuart and a few others that had CSA names.
I recommend WILEY SWORDS "SHILOH, BLOODY APRIL"
My father's side fought for the Tennessee regiment's and orphan brigades (Paducah Kentucky regiment CSA) my mother's side fought for the Alabama and Mississippi regiments.
Well that’s a shame
bummer, dood
Finally, an answer to Scary Movie 3's biggest question: How do you wake up dead?
that's what i was thinking lol
Shiloh? Dang, I was gonna guess Chancelorville
So many to choose from y’all😉
1. Grant wasn’t at Chancellorsville
2. Shiloh was probably one of the more famous battles where the men were caught off guard in their tents
@kingmuddy5898 It was the rebel-yell-from-the-woods thing that confused me.
Grant was not present at CHANCELLORSVILLE...HOOKER WAS IN COMMAND..
If you bear in mind it’s about Grant the name Chancellorsville would never have come up.
Only problem is they tried to use as little actors as possible to save money and it shows
Can only do so much with limited budget i suposse
This is why reenactors are the best why to portray large scale armies
It doesnt really show tbh
Wouldn't that be a good thing anyway? Most of the soldiers were really young and inexperienced, so having non actors would show that.
As few*
I'm hearing those Rebel Yells at the end.
This is the First day of the Battle of Shiloh in 1862,the Confederates Ambushed a regiment Union troops,and massacred them,those who survived fought in the rest of the Battle,many of those who died had actually only just gotten their field gear less than 24 hours prior,despite this,the Union did win a victory.
This is the Battle that first put Ulysses Grant and William Sherman on the American radar as competent generals,and it was the first of the Battles(and campaigns)that now cause many to call Grant a butcher,which to be fair it was a grindhouse,but not because of just Grant,the reason many of the significant battles of the Civil War were considered brutal was because the Civil war was a time where war was changing,repeating rifles were replacing Muskets,artillery began to get an upgrade,and tactics were slowly shifting from Napoleonic style lines of men facing each other-type battles,to proto-WW1,deeply entrenched,war of attrition,where one side slowly outfoxes the other,the Civil war was the last of the Old wars,General Lee was the last of the old generals,but at the same time it was the first of the new wars,and General Grant was the first of the new Generals
Nice review, Martin. I enjoyed the explanations using your miniatures 👍
Helps bring home the horror of the Civil War.
Now the extremist right wing MAGA crazies are calling for yet another Civil War
How much bullet do you want in your musket?
A:yes
Shiloh, Grant's biggest defeat, covered up by the timely arrival of Don Carlos Buell's Army of the Ohio at the end of the day on April 6, 62.
Most of the Union troops fighting the next day were Buell's and so the defeat of the Confederates on April 7 was due to his army. Grant took credit for the victory by Buell's men, but everyone knew the truth!
Grant's troops also blamed him for their defeat on April 6. Grant's failure to prepare any adequate defences or to do proper recon of his forward lines was criminal negligence.
Ordinary southern boys grew up hunting with guns. Most northerners never held a gun in their life before the war.
And the ones who did were mostly in the Western states rather than the main Union recruiting hubs of Boston, New York, etc.
The "show" is a docuseries entitled "Grant". It is based on Ron Chernow's biography of Ulysses S. Grant. What you are watching is the beginning of Albert Sidney Johnston's surprise attack at Shiloh.
I love how musket fire magically makes people fly 10 feet when getting shot, rather than just going limp and falling down.
They were large caliber rifles. Slightly larger than .50 caliber.
@@rockstar1967 they didn't have the muzzle velocity of a Barrett or mounted .50
@@zoanth4 Of course not. You wouldn't fly 10 feet, but it would definitely be a very hard impact.
@@rockstar1967 quite a thud indeed
Does anyone know were i can watch this in Canada
Can you not on Amazon Prime Video? It's called Grant miniseries maybe history vault?
Can watch it for free on sflix
Your living room?
You'll first have to get permission from Trudeau and then pay the "International Televised Tax."
@@MrHanvin375ja volt! Nusing is free in Canada……except American protectionism…….
Name the Show please
The représentation here is a bit extreme. In fact, the idea of Shiloh being an absolute surprise for soldiers and high command is, or at leat, could be, an exageration.
If you take testimonies from some soldiers and officers before the battle, they knew the confederates were gathering nerby and even informed their superiors, specialy Sherman about a potential attack. But Sherman ignored it, so did Grant. The reason is that they thought Johnston was still more to the south, and they did not imagine that he would take the fight to them. But from the soldiers point o view, many of them knew. Because the scouts had regular skirmishes with southern units, frequently reported to headquarters without answer. Some soldiers, pursuing a patrol in tbe area even found a part of the confederate camp, again, without any reaction of headquarters. This leading to one thing. When the confederates prepared their attack, it seems that at least a portion of the army of Tennessee knew it, and prepared for it. And in the first morning of the battle, it was not the attack itsef that surprised the Union, but its violence. The fact is that no such fights had been seen in the war so far, so even if the soldiers were technicaly prepared, they were not "ready", psychologicaly speaking. But they still were waiting for the rebs to come.
I get those informations from the book "Nothing but Victory, The army of the Tennessee, 1861-1865" where testimonies are quoted, for those who would like to see ;)
The idea that it was such a surprise that soldiers were killed with bayonets in their sleep is a myth. Mostly carried by journalists, and it's important to say that no journalist witnessed the battle of Shiloh. At the end, the idea of the surprise attack was a better option for Grant and Sherman, rather than admitting that they had the possibility to prevent the panic of the first day, but didn't, out of miscalculation of the situation. Anyway, Grant will later state, and he is right about that, that intrenchments and defensive works were not a thing at this state of the war, and such practices would not appear until a few months after Shiloh. So there is not much that could have been done to prevent the attack, if not maybe a better organisation of the camp and troups and a better system of alarm.
Name of movie pls . 🙏🏻
Grant miniseries
@@RealDannyHelmerthanks a lot ...from occupied Palestinian 🇵🇸🇵🇸🇵🇸🇵🇸🇵🇸
Grant was caught completely by surprise here without buell arriving when he did Grant would be remembered forca collasal failure. Funny how things work out
Name movie, please?
Grant miniseries
Looks like no sentry’s were posted how they get that close
My Hubby Shamus Grandfather was here! Boston..Irish Briage. . The 69th of the 69th fighting to save this country! Barb
..Krakow..Polski!....love you Jesus! ! I MARRIED a Ultra Irish Hubby Sha'mus O'Donnell From DONEGAL Ireland...we are so tired of people walking over us!
FYI- There are towns & counties throughout the US, mostly the South, named after Casimir Pulaski
I have ancestors from Donegal. Their last name is Gallaher. Shortened from O'Golliher or something like that. Came to America around 1760, then some moved to Mississippi around 1840. One died at the Battle of the Wilderness fighting under A.P. Hill.
Name of the movie please
What is the name of the film?
Avengers Civil War.
Grant miniseries
1862 Battle For Glory
Mi tatarabuelo lucho para la unión al final de la guerra se estableció en California donde contó a mi abuelo como fue esa guerra al final mi abuelo regresó a México pero antes de morir me habló de esto y todo lo que vivió mi tatarabuelo 😢
“After Shiloh, the South never smiled again.”
Did some research.. a relative emigrated to the US. His son fought in Normandy against a relative on the German side.. same beach .. sometimes fate is toxic
Both survived ! Now I have relatives in France .. as the American was wounded and met a French nurse
Well now I need to go watch this.
What movie?
Grant miniseries
What film is this please
Shiloh?
Yes because Sherman did get injured in here and a surprise attack
@@RealDannyHelmerthis isn’t Sherman though. He was wounded in the hand. I’m thinking this is Everett Peabody
Awesome series
What movie or series please 🙏🏼
Grant miniseries
This looks like an awesome miniseries. I'll have to catch it on prime
What is it called? Im so sick of people gate keeping shows when the post clips
@@raymanvermillionare2962 what do you mean? It's the pinned comment...
@@lucky7even622 I’m laughing my ass off 😂 that’s literally the first place I checked…
Where's the Yankee Officer of the Watch? The Sergeant of the Sentries? Corporal of the Watch? Sentry posts?
And this is why you never underestimate your foes. Especially in his backyard!
Fun Fact: The Confederate Army was made up of slightly better shooters than their Union counterparts. However, the Union had numbers and mass production.
What's the name of the movie on Amazon? Please!
Grant miniseries
Which southerner decided their charge would sound like a bunch of hooligans 😂
Because zgdy werd windowse bunch hooligans
It worked pretty well scared the shit out of the other side.
Spirit of history seems to be somewhat with the North.
The truth always lies with the winner
@@wsean87 not when it comes to Civil War, ww1
Well yeah, the South was a bunch of slave driving traitors. I would HOPE the spirit of history is against them
@@wsean87 fact
@@wsean87what the South espouses as the truth couldn't be further from it.
Nombre de la película por favor , gracias , 🎉🎉
Love the rebel yell at the end
9:33, Baseado em como era o Pai do Xerxes, eu não duvido que ele faria isso em tal situação😬.
I have not seen this movie before, but because the union guys are being attacked and their tents I know it is Jackson's last battle. He's the one who set up being able to hit them so by surprise in the flank that he caught them in their tents. Unfortunately about a half hour later he was accidentally killed play a Confederate who mystic him and the party of officers accompanying him for Union cavalry. And by the way, Jackson was not only opposed to slavery, he had illegally started a school for slaves in Virginia.
I think this is set in Tennessee. Someone said before, Shiloh. I believe that to be correct
James Robertson wrote about Jackson's view on slavery:
"Jackson neither apologized for nor spoke in favor of the practice of slavery. He probably opposed the institution. Yet in his mind the Creator had sanctioned slavery, and man had no moral right to challenge its existence. The good Christian slaveholder was one who treated his servants fairly and humanely at all times."
@@TheCrusher72 somewhere I read he was a Sunday school teacher and taught slave children in his class. might be wrong.
@@ronbanks1541 No, you are correct - and do you know why he did it? (Sunday school) "should be given to the colored children, believing that it was more important and useful to put the strong hand of the Gospel under the ignorant African race, to lift them up"
@@TheCrusher72I want a few slaves
Where can i watch this?
Grant miniseries on Amazon Prime Video
* Dixie's land sounds aggressively *
Then switch's to a kazoo rendition before the song ends
* then gets drowned out by Battle Cry of Freedom, as Grant kicks Lee in the dick and Sherman burns his house down *
The name of this miniserie tv?
Grant miniseries by History, It's on Amazon Prime Video or History Channel
I have several relatives who fought for the Union States to free the slaves… 4 men died and others got wounded. One person was an 11 year old boy who was a drummer boy for a New York infantry regiment. He died in 1942; my dad knew him when he was a kid. Today when I think of the civil war, I think to myself- what did those guys fight and die for. They would had been better off staying put on their farms
Really? As wars go, the civil war was a pretty easy one to justify. There are much worse wars, like ww1
to maintain Federal power over the people of the south
State rights
@@mikeladouceur2230 state rights to do what
Are we just gonna forget that the Emancipation Proclomation came as a result of the Civil War? One of the most powerful documents in our country? We freed slaves in this country people, why are we coming to the conclusion that the Civil was was pointless?
What movie is this?
Skirmishers are terrifying during civil war..
What movie is it?
Grant miniseries
1862 Battle For Glory
What is the movie name ?
If Stonewall Jackson wouldn’t have been shot by frindly fire, history would have been changed. Stonewall was a master of tactical war.
Wouldnt have chamged the outcome. Simply couldnt compete from a logistical sense. Confederacy knew they were on a timer. How long before they finally ran out of men and arms? All the tactical genius in the world cant save you from a a lack of supply and manpower. Logistics is everything.
@@28Hazefur unfortunately
@@28Hazefur5 years at least. Plenty of time for Lincoln to get voted out for being a fuckup and someone less interested in bloodshed to get voted in.
Possibly, if he'd made it to Gettysburg. But yes, the logistical advantage would have meant defeat, in time.
How did Stonewall Jackson perform at the Seven Days battles? Or at Fredericksburg?
And also, the reason he was killed was not just a coincidence; he wanted to destroy the Union at Chancellorsville and pushed, and pushed despite his divisional commanders clearly knowing his men had done all he could.
He goes out to scout Union positions for an ill-advised attack in the evening, and got shot by his own men because he was between lines.
The same “push and push” stuff is exactly why the Confederates, despite winning that battle, lost like 10,000 men that they could not replace. It was a great victory considering the numbers and he probably had to do it, but actions have consequences.
I get the sense that if Jackson was at Gettysburg, he would’ve endorsed Pickett’s Charge.
Look great..which movies is it??
Grant miniseries
Grand miniseries
Nonslaveowners fighting nonslaveowners. Politics is the art of subconsciously convincing someone to act outside their own self interests.
well maybe the good ole boys should have fought against slaveowners instead of non-slave owners and the war would have been over before it began
@@failtolawlsecession was more about unfair federal taxes than anything
The south was an economic textile powerhouse and didnt want to pay the federal taxes they felt werent deserved. But the massive economic prosperity was built on the backs of thousands of enslaved africans.
Keeping the union together was more important. If we were just a union of states, we would've easily been divided by foreign powers in later wars. Imagine if China wooed Texas to fight the East Coast
Read the Cornerstone Speech, slavery was absolutely the main reason for breaking away from the Union. And sure, regular dudes didn't own slaves, but many supported slavery because they thought black people were less than human and should be subjugated instead of an equal part of society.
What movie title?
La moindre blessure c était une septicémie, balle Minie en plomb ,et souvent des amputations, .
Name film
Let's Dixie, keep it up!
Series or movie please anyone? 🙏🏼 😊
Grant miniseries
@Aziair thank you so much! I'm a huge history nerd. 🥰
The Civil War is my least favorite part of US history it saddens me very much to learn about
Get ready for round 2. Some people are doing everything they can to start it so that they can rule over our ashes
Deo Vindice
If God was in your side, he would've spared Stonewall Jackson from being gunned down by his own men 😂
What film is?
Grant miniseries
Whats the name of the movie?
Grant miniseries
That’s why you should never camp out in the open, it’s a dead zone.
name of the movie or series
The history of our country is wild to me… yeah other great nations around the world have history that dates back 10x farther than the U.S. but our up bringing to where we are today was like no other…
What up bringing? You know nothing of history your country is not even your own
Yep, the U.S was brought up by constant war but that doesn’t make us any different to who we were 150 years ago
And they only way Americans will lose a war is either by politics or by civil war, and manly because our military behavior is nothing the likes any other seen over their country’s military history
How is it different?@@Archangels_righthandboi
@@Raphix Here’s the thing, there is none
It actually is like many others in some regards and in some regards it's very special but for all the wrong reasons like the genocide of the natives in the 19th century or the civil war fought purely over slavery is fucking insane.
Name film?
Grant (History Channel Documentary)
I don’t think the rifles were that crazy accurate. Landing all these perfect headshots.
Yeah, they are exaggerating a bit. Sherman was under fire for most of the day without getting wounded, Grant somewhat less so as he moved around the battlefield.
They’re exaggerating the accuracy because the amount of fire would’ve been a lot higher in reality. They shorted on actors and you can tell, the number of attackers would’ve been much higher than what was displayed. There were brigades leading the attacks into the camps, not companies like this makes it look
Those head shots are more along the lines of,:"To whom it may concern.". They were just shooting in the general direction of the Union camp.
Name of the movie
Delaware made slavery illegal in 1901. Almost 30yrs after the civil war ended.
How was the war about ending slavery again? Whyd delaware keep them for so long?
Cause it was never about slavery. It was about heavy taxation from the North towards the South. All this happened after the war of 1812.
Like it or not, the abolition of slavery is the primary reason listed in the articles of secession for why the confederacy wanted to separate themselves from the US. You can cope and cry all you want, but facts don’t care about your feelings.
Now I would for sure agree with you that the abolishment of slavery isn’t the ONLY reason the southern states succeeded, but it is objectively the primary reason. The South said so themselves.
Maybe Biden knows. He supports the KKK.
Hey, the Southern states themselves said it was about slavery, and I will take their word for it. Its all over their constitutions and declarations of secession.
Shiloh right? Caught em with their pants down that day. Amazing the Confederates managed to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.
Up with the Stars, down with the traitors!
Confederate stars?
@@johncorrall1739 Fuck no.
@maxwellhohensee9787
Confederates were no different than those who fought in the war of independence. Aside from the fact they were beaten.
@@johncorrall1739 And the fact that they were slaver assholes at a time when slavery had been banned in most of the Western world by about 1805. Fighting to assert our right to govern ourselves vs fighting to keep a corrupt, morally repugnant practice alive in order to make profit is very different.
@@maxwellhohensee9787You a yankee?
What movie?
People who fought for the South were not fighting for slavery but fighting against a centralised authority in Washington DC.
Those who wanted slavery were the agrarian aristocracy, not the average working man.
Apologist. Right, but they also didn't think that slavery was a show stopper so... there's that.
@@alexcordero6672neither did the North. It was about money for them. That’s why they offered the Corwin Amendment which would have made slavery essentially inviolate. Not a single Southern politician voted for it.
You should go read the founding documents from each confederate state, what they said.
White supremacy and slavery were the main reasons for secession
They were fighting on the issue of slavery do not ignorant on this
@@davidpadilla9613 They were fighting for freedom from the north for state self-determination. Slavery still existed in a few Union states like Kentucky and Missouri.
Only 25% of Confederates owned slaves
What battle was this?
🤔here in missouri some of us are proud of our confederate ancesors period!!👍🏻🖖🏻😉
Proud of traitors who were manipulated by rich plantation owners, what a legacy.
And us real Missourians are not 😊
thats ok i was born in carthage mo so if thats not a fucking MISSOURIAN i dont know what is 🤔👍🏻🖖🏻😉🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@georgescott7556 a real Missourian wouldn’t what his country separated you traitor
I'm sure there are kids in Germany that are proud of what their great grandparents did too
We should insist this history be taught😊😊😊
History would be a wonderful thing if it was true.
@@phatzwave4424why the hate speech?
@@JimJam8008 How is that hate speech? The guy is just paraphrasing the age old "History is written by the victors" statement. That's why Iran, Iraq, Libya etc. are all horrific countries that violated every human right and want the rest of the world dead - because America won.
What's the series called?
Grant miniseries
The Grant Miniseries
State rule versus federalism.
And Federalism won.
Was this the wilderness? I suspect that I'm wrong, but don't know.
This war could have been prevented if the federal gov. would have rewarded southern farmers to release slaves.
Or they could have not implemented the tariffs from 1828 forward. But that would require more than but my teachers told me.
No it wouldn't have, it would have invigorated the slave trade
@@stephenmartinez9911 Good point
@@MrAdamchristopher2sorry your teachers were not lost cause myth believers. Too bad that they told you the truth and not daughters of the confederacy myths
Not really, could have been prevented if there wasn’t secession
What's the name of this movie
Grant miniseries
There is so much wrong from this scene I find it offensive. First, when you're hit with a musket you aren't "pulled backward" using invisible thread. Nor do they go straight through 75-year-old pines. Second, they're not all fucking marksmen. The grays are firing like they've got WWII sniper scopes. And why did they only fire one shot at one sentry to start the battle if they were going to fire into the camp anyway? You just rake the whole place with an opening volley.
Third, he's screaming "left" and pointing to his right. Finally, and I cannot stress this enough, why is the general and his cadre assembled while everyone is asleep? And since they are asleep, why aren't their muskets loaded? At least three guys take a knee to load their weapon as the sentry ran through the tents.
This thing is a mess.
Calm down Patton. It’s OK.
I assumed he meant the Camp’s left, if facing the enemy. That’s how I would prepare the men.
You are aware the south had more marksmanship? Look at the numbers.
Hey, this may suprise you but this specific event here is Rebs attacking a camp of green recruits. So yeah, a lot of shit aint up to regulation.
This must be depicting Chancellorsville. What is this from?
Grant miniseries
The bad guys won that war
Name movie ?
Grant miniseries on Amazon Prime Video