Spectacular result! I actually shot “by accident” with a 50% moon (opposite the Milky Way) and realized what a difference it made in helping me have a good exposure for the foreground. So now I’m totally fine with shooting with a 30% moon for example (always opposite where the Milky Way is), so that it actually lights the foreground properly, and without losing too much details in the Milky Way. I like it even more than when there is no moon at all. 👍🏻
YES! How good is it, I always shoot this way when I can. Makes life SO MUCH easier for your camera gear and editing software to acheive a fantastic result. Especially for people with only kit lenses, can all of a sudden get a workable image!
Really cool photo. Would have been awesome if the milky way could have been deeper blacks, more dynamic. What a process to make this photo. I really appreciate your creativity and skill and passion. Thank you. I enjoy watching you create.
Matt, what a stunning outcome, absolutely nailed it and definitely got a keeper there and is one of those types of images we would all like to take. great work mate and looking forward to your sunrise results
I really like the foreground. The stars not as much. Not a bust, not a game changer. It looks like it needs to be darker or more contrast or more vibrancy/saturation or it needs something in post, but by the comments here everyone love is so it must be a good image.
You're making all these astrophotography with F 2.8 lenses, and yet I see so many RUclipsrs talk about F2 or F 1.4. They make it look like F 2.8 is the worst thing for photography. You really made it easy because F 2.8 lenses are easier and cheaper to buy. and more useful also because there are zoom lenses with F 2.8. Which makes them more versatile. Instead of. F 1.4 lenses, which are primes.
Love it! Great image, though I prefer star fields and foreground at the same Focal length. Closer to reality, less constructed. That Samyang though. Wow. I think I’ll pick up the recent iteration autofocus version. I wonder if it is as good as the manual focus.
Yeah I understand what you mean, sometimes I think to do a scene justice you need to play around with the lens you have. I can not wait to try that lens out - will be on my list if it stacks up for sure!!
I had some surprisingly good experiences with night sky photography using the XC 35mm F2 so can only imagine that the XF 33mm F1.4 is going to be even better. Keep up the good work :-)
Hi Mathew! Which Google Earth App do you recommend for landscape scouting? There are so many. Your help here would be greatly appreciated!! Thanks in advance!!
Dude talks way to much to keep my attention lol. Less talking about what you're going to do and more doing it. Sorry just way to much time wastes on nothing
Hey mate, that's fine I totally understand. Each to their own, plenty more videos out there for you to watch and enjoy. Sorry mine aren't ideal for you. Have a cracker of a day :)
Spectacular result! I actually shot “by accident” with a 50% moon (opposite the Milky Way) and realized what a difference it made in helping me have a good exposure for the foreground. So now I’m totally fine with shooting with a 30% moon for example (always opposite where the Milky Way is), so that it actually lights the foreground properly, and without losing too much details in the Milky Way. I like it even more than when there is no moon at all. 👍🏻
YES! How good is it, I always shoot this way when I can. Makes life SO MUCH easier for your camera gear and editing software to acheive a fantastic result. Especially for people with only kit lenses, can all of a sudden get a workable image!
Great Videos much inspiration.Thankyou Matthew fingers crossed for my night out!!!John
Oh man, it rocks!
Stunning…. simply stunning
Thanks mate!
Really cool photo. Would have been awesome if the milky way could have been deeper blacks, more dynamic. What a process to make this photo. I really appreciate your creativity and skill and passion. Thank you. I enjoy watching you create.
Thanks so much mate! I Have since gone back to re-edit this photo from your kind words. I like it so much better now also :D
@@matthewstorerphotography I’d see love to the updated photo?
It is stunning. Thank you for sharing 🙏🏻
Tôi ở Việt nam và rất thích video của bạn ! Nhất là bạn đang chụp với máy ảnh Fujifilm
Thank you! :D
Absolute result mate!
Cheers!
Matt, what a stunning outcome, absolutely nailed it and definitely got a keeper there and is one of those types of images we would all like to take. great work mate and looking forward to your sunrise results
Glad you enjoyed it
We all know it's stunning... Wow, just wow!
Thank you! :D
Now I want to buy this picture.
Stunning 😍
Thank you! 😊
Superb mate!
Thank you! :D
It's a banger! 💣💣💥
Thanks so much - really appreciate it :D
Great shot, very inspiring. A lot of work, well worth the effort!
100% have wanted to capture this image for a long time now :D
This is absolutely INSANE!!!
What a big discover, thansk Youtuve haha!!! Im in love with your work mate, so inspirational :D
Big hug from Spain mate!
Thanks a ton!
I really like the foreground. The stars not as much. Not a bust, not a game changer. It looks like it needs to be darker or more contrast or more vibrancy/saturation or it needs something in post, but by the comments here everyone love is so it must be a good image.
Thanks for your feedback mate, will have a look more in PP to what can be done
Great work ! stunning shot ,standing ovation here . My copy of the 33 1.4 is on my way cant wait to try this one.
Amazing! Me either, I am more interested in the 23mm as it would be ideal for my work. Let me know how good it is for Night Sky Stars :D
yoyo, coz of you i bought a samyang 12mm f2 to my 6400 and started to take mw photos :)
Awesome, well done mate
Thank you! :D
You're making all these astrophotography with F 2.8 lenses, and yet I see so many RUclipsrs talk about F2 or F 1.4. They make it look like F 2.8 is the worst thing for photography. You really made it easy because F 2.8 lenses are easier and cheaper to buy. and more useful also because there are zoom lenses with F 2.8. Which makes them more versatile. Instead of. F 1.4 lenses, which are primes.
Superb Photography Matthew.
Many thanks!
Came out quite nice! 👍
Thank you! Cheers!
Unbelievable image(s) !
Thanks so much - really appreciate it :D
@@matthewstorerphotography Welcome.
Would be nice to show the editing part also. The final image is impressive!
Thanks so much - I leave a lot of those tips and tricks on my membership course :D
it is great...
THANKYOU...
Love it! Great image, though I prefer star fields and foreground at the same Focal length. Closer to reality, less constructed.
That Samyang though. Wow. I think I’ll pick up the recent iteration autofocus version. I wonder if it is as good as the manual focus.
Yeah I understand what you mean, sometimes I think to do a scene justice you need to play around with the lens you have. I can not wait to try that lens out - will be on my list if it stacks up for sure!!
I had some surprisingly good experiences with night sky photography using the XC 35mm F2 so can only imagine that the XF 33mm F1.4 is going to be even better. Keep up the good work :-)
Thanks for sharing
very curious about the XC 35mm F2, I am about to got one ;D
Really good image, too bad about the clouds but that's not your fault. Keep em commin
The final shot was processed, ovbiously. Could you post the original file?
Hi Mathew!
Which Google Earth App do you recommend for landscape scouting? There are so many. Your help here would be greatly appreciated!! Thanks in advance!!
Hello, just google maps, hold down CTRL and you can turn it to 3D mode!
Mate....what a rip snorter ! 😜
Thanks so much - really appreciate it :D
Dude talks way to much to keep my attention lol. Less talking about what you're going to do and more doing it. Sorry just way to much time wastes on nothing
Hey mate, that's fine I totally understand. Each to their own, plenty more videos out there for you to watch and enjoy. Sorry mine aren't ideal for you. Have a cracker of a day :)