My devout catholic father left Catholic boarding school in 1960 notes that he got through 6 years of Catholic education with little idea of the catechism Lack of formation is definitely not a post-V2 phenomena. There has never been a better time for formation that now. This is and will be a golden age for Catholicism. It’s genuinely exciting
why do I feel the same way! it’s so exciting to be a catholic this year. I feel like we have gone from sleeping to know starting to educate and fight back from all lies that was spread about us. ❤️❤️
@@j897xce Pints is helpful along the way, but caution is needed brother. It leads astray at critical turns. Let Pints lead you to the Apostolic Church, but jump instead to long held authors, traditions and the words of the holy Father, Pope Francis. Be alert to schism and apostasy
Here is some practical advice: if you want better music, ad orientem, altar rails: PRAY FOR IT. Yes, God answers these prayers. It happened at my parish.
Pray for it, but also pay for it. We have almost zero musicians who dedicate their careers to the Church. Even renowned Gregorian ensembles are secular or just university projects without tied to Rome. It's hard (and pricey) to even find organ masters or secular professionals and students who are truly learned in the Gregorian or polyphony/ars antiqua tradition. With the passing of the old patronage system and the whole secularization and separation of the Church and States, we kinda lost our will and cultural pungency and the rest is history. It's nice that everyone wants Gregorian or to listen to a des Pres in a high mass, but who are we kidding? Things will not fall from the sky without a huge collective endeavor. But things are moving and I am truly hopeful to see the Vii to its fullness. For an art like Gregorian Chant that was almost lost, had to be puzzled out by the Solesmes monks and now we have monthly releases of albums with incredible reconstructions and interpretations, we can only have hope again and do our parts too. Have a child or two that have that music intuition? Why not try to show him the Church's legacy? Hope it helps!
I agree! I did midnight adoration to 3am every Friday for years and prayed for an altar rail. We got it! Ended up switching to the TLM but I’m glad it’s there.
Yes, pray for it! But also you can ask your local priest for certain things, like moving the tabernacle front and center and having kneelers available for communion. I’ve seen it implemented in local parishes from suggestion.
Pray! AND WORK. Seek out priests who want ROTR masses and SUPPORT THEM. Your local parish priest probably likes the status quo so you will need to find someone open to doing things a reverent way
I reverted from orthodoxy to catholicism because I live 30 min away from a FSSP parish. And 15 minutes from an orthodox catholic parish. So I can go to two lively parish full of faith and traditional wholesome faith and practice. The FSSP parish is full at every one of four masses on sunday. I am truly blessed! Glory to God!
It is my experience in my parish that older parishioners (60 and older) are primarily the ones who keep calling for "new"/popular music (and video screens!), because they think it will attract the young people. Ironically, the young people are the ones who crave the "old time" (Gregorian/traditional organ) music and more traditional celebration and involvement in the Mass. I think the oldsters (I'm 56, so I can cast dispersion) only knew the folk-singing, tambourine-playing hippie version of Mass from the '70's, and they think the "youngsters" of today also "need" the current cultural influence, instead of relying on the timeless mystery and Grace of the Holy Spirit to make the connection.
Absolutely right. In my parish we are doing a massive capital campaign which I am not donating to number one because we have nothing left after bills right now but number two because I strongly disagree what they are doing with the money. They are buying a property so that they can house the priest off site and turn the rectory into offices. NO, if you need more offices at all (which is questionable with remote work), then buy OFFICE SPACE off site so that the priest will be housed AT THE PARISH. They are spending millions on things that are harmful like that and then complain the young people aren’t donating the pennies they have to support it. In my commentary to the online survey I responded to suggested projects not to do those and instead install altar rails
I’m 59 and have been seeking traditional Mass, Ad Orientum, Chant, Incense, Communion in tongue, for over 30 years!!! Realizing its probably not going your way happen in my lifetime. But praying and fasting for our children and grandchildren…
@@NCR-rs8ie so true! I’m 76 and can’t drive to a TLM. I’m sick of hearing “we” want the N.O. Changes! Do we not go to mass if we cannot get to a reverent TLM? Watch it on TV?
1:44:47 I agree. I am a new Catholic (2023) and I just went to my first Traditional Latin Mass. It was so beautiful and I cannot wait to go back again! The Latin Mass was packed at 7:30 am on Sunday, compared the Novous Ordo that I had been going to for years on Saturday at 4 pm and Sunday at 12 pm. I was so surprised at how many people my age and younger were there! Absolutely wonderful! 😍
I’m a staunch traditionalist, a convert from evangelical Protestantism, and I accept Vatican II in its entirety. It just saddens me that it was so sensationalized and poorly implemented. What Vatican II was and what was put in place are two different things.
Until recently, no ordinary Catholic was able to read Vatican II. It's now a thick paperback almost as long as the Catechism. So liberal Catholics beat us over the head with their interpretations/false reports of Vatican II. They just recently quit, but they've had decades to work their agenda using Vatican II as cover. This is how I remember it, and I was born in 1959.
What they said about music in the liturgy around 1:19:00 and 1:32:30 was so spot on. If you read Sacrosanctum Concilium, it very clearly states that SACRED music shall have pride of place, and Gregorian Chant, polyphony, and the ORGAN are the most appropriate methods to use for music in the liturgy. I'm a cantor at my parish and I've been trying to communicate this to the music director.
The document is riddled with exceptions. Chris Ferarra in his article "Sacrosanctum Concilium: A Lawyer examines the loopholes" demonstrates that every percieved "abuse" has a loophole in the council document allowing for it. eg. "In 1964, only a year after SC was enacted, Pope Paul VI issued his motu proprio entitled Sacram Liturgiam. Article 9 of Sacram Liturgiam authorized all national hierarchies to approve vernacular translations of the Mass, subject only to Rome's ex post facto approval, which was given in every case. So much for the "use of Latin" in the Roman liturgy. The "particular law" exception swallowed up this much-vaunted "conservative" norm within a year, as Bugnini clearly knew it would. Anyone who says that Article 36 of SC has been "violated" and the Council "disobeyed" by reason of the all-vernacular new liturgy has never read SC in its entirety, or is pretending that two Popes and nearly the entire hierarchy have not already shown us that SC authorizes (even if it does not mandate) Mass entirely in the vernacular. Arts. 114-116 - "[114] . . . The treasury of sacred music is to be preserved and cultivated with great care." [Art. 116] - ". . . other things being equal [Gregorian chant] should be given pride of place in liturgical services . . ." The phrase "other things being equal" partially undermines the phrase "pride of place," and the remaining provisions of SC (discussed below) complete the undermining by vesting "territorial ecclesiastical authority" with total control over the adaptation of church music to "local needs," along with the rest of the liturgy." salbert.tripod.com/SClel.htm
I consider myself traditional, and I am of the opinion that criticism of Vatican II is largely anti-traditionalist. The Church has the power to call these councils and we as obedient members should follow their lead. We should operate from the assumption that our interpretation is uncharitable or wrong, not that our leaders have done wrong. That is, imo, the traditional approach. And as I’ve dug into this issue, that opinion has only been affirmed
@@RosaIbanez-m3y Vatican I calls for "true hierarchical obedience" that is qualified according to St. Thomas Aquinas' teaching on 3 types of obedience, perfect, true and false obedience. Confusion actually comes from when people obey indiscriminately. And this is how we have come to where we are now with a Pope that elevates James Martin and throws Cardinal Burke out into the outer darkness.
There is nothing "traditional' about slavish and indiscriminate servile obedience. Lateran IV called for Jews to be forced to wear identifying dress and not to be seen in public during the Triduum and other holy days. The Catholics of the day simply ignored the decrees of Lateran IV. When Pope Stephen VI, had the corpse of Pope Formosus dug up, put on trial with a deacon assigned to provide answers for the corpse, the deacon was fully in his moral rights to defy the order. Pope Stephen legally declared Formosus to have been an invalid Pope and declared all of his ordinations invalid. This was overturned and then ratified, and overturned again through a few cycles by subsequent Popes. St. Thomas Aquinas teaches a 3 fold obedience, perfect, true and false obedience. You are morally obligated to oppose being falsely obedient. Pope Benedict as Joseph Ratzinger stated in Principles of Theology that some councils had been a complete waste of time. He thought time would tell, and he hoped that Vatican II wouldn't be one of those, but it's likely and not a heresy to believe it was just that.
@@gerry30 Pope Francis has done nothing to deserve disobedience. I understand discernment and he has done nothing to deserve disobedience. St Thomas distinguishes three levels of obedience: “one, sufficient for salvation, and consisting in obeying when one is bound to obey; secondly, perfect obedience, which obeys in all things lawful; thirdly, indiscreet obedience, which obeys even in matters unlawful”. The last of these is thus not an act of virtue but falls short of the good that motivates all virtuous acts. Pope Francis has done nothing unlawful and has asked nothing unlawful from us Catholics.
@@RosaIbanez-m3y Says you. Francis is overtly NOT confirming the brethren and he is deliberately giving stones instead of bread. His scandals are growing epic in scale and number. From his early "beach ball" on the altar scandals to his Pachamama offenses against the First Commandment. If St. Peter was resisted to his face as described in the infallible testimony of St. Paul for merely being intimidated by Jews, how much more of a rebuke and resistance is Francis deserving of?
I'm a Protestant from a very anti-Catholic denomination. Im investigating the Catholic church and started to attend Mass. I would never attend a Novus Odo mass again. Every chapel i went to was the same when in came ro rhe Novus Odo 1). Every was 150 year old. 2). People dressed in whatever way they want 3). Lay people giving the eucherist to the faithful. Worsw, in one Mass, there was a Native American dance. For a month now, ive been attending traditional mass at a kicall FSSP Chapel. You can see the difference not only in the Masses but also the people. They're very young, have lots of children, and respect the Mass. If i convert, it will be all Latin Mass for me until they fix the Novus Odo
@@bthemedia Yes, because I admit my areas of study. I am a dogmatic and fundamental (systematic) theologian. I was up front about that, so people know that when I talk about the history of rites, it is not my area of expertise. I can only give my opinion, or point out differendes between Sacrosanctum Concilium and the liturgy as you see it today.
@@decluesviews2740 This interview could not be a more clear sign of Vatican II. You were a Catholic priest and gave my sister her First Holy Communion in the Charlotte Diocese. What a mess! Stop defending the conciliar church and the Novus Ordo Mass. The Second Vatican Council opened the door to Satan. Paul VI even admitted that the "Smoke of Satan" has entered the Church. You are a failed fruit of the Conciliar Church. Stop turning a blind eye to the Crisis in the Church! #Vatican II #ApeChurch #SynodalChurch #NovusOrdo #NewReligion
I think Dr. DeClue is clueless. I lived through Vatican II and its aftermath. It has DESTROYED the Catholic Church. The Catholic Church has morphed into a different organization altogether: The Vatican II Sect. That's why I moved over to Eastern Orthodoxy. Thank Heaven that in Orthodoxy I don't have to worry about the next foot to drop! Each time when one of the "mainstream" bishops, cardinals or the pope speaks in their milquetoast and liberal ways, my reasons to leave are strongly re-enforced. Vatican II Sect, RIP.
Excellent interview. I really appreciate the humility of Dr. Richard - he prefers to explain why he can't give a straight answer instead of pushing something confidently. And I like his line of clearing the understanding of words and sources before making a statement, with a charitable approach towards these who have good intentions even if they mix up some terms.
I grew up in NO and as a kid liked the happy clappy sappy mass, but now most seem like all the settings, actions, music of it work against belief in the sacrifice of the mass -- Christ the King giving himself to redeem us and feeding us himself in the Eucharist. Mostly NO masses are like penance to me. I attend our diocese low mass on Sundays and we have a sense that our priests greatly care for our souls by their actions and homilies, and we have a volunteer schola that chants so beautifully it brings tears of joy!
I love that now it's going for you and your family. I was introduced to the TLM in 2016. This was a Low Mass. And I was impressed from the get go. I didn't get to experience a High Mass until 2018 when I attended the Walk for Life with a couple of friends. Over the years I went on and off to the TLM Low Mass at my local diocesan chapel (not SSPX). This changed in 2022, when I started going more regularly. Attendance at the chapel skyrocketed in the time before I started attending regularly, that they had to move the TLM to the bigger Church. All thanks to the pandemic, I guess. A lot of Church's were shutting down. And the TLM was being offered outside, so many people from other localities started attending. Many never went back to their former parishes and stayed because of the TLM. I haven't gone back to my former parish either. I've found something beautiful with this community I'm now apart of.
I absolutely loved this episode. Dr. DeClue was fantastic. I hadn’t heard of him before. There’s so much goodness in here, and many many things I needed to hear personally. Thank you for this Matt & everyone at PWA!
“If your temptation is to usurp the rights of the Church hierarchy and authority and become its judge…. Every schismatic thought that they were the faithful remnant, every single one thought they were right and Rome was wrong” -- good luck with that!!! Chose you this day whom you shall serve but as for me and my household we shall serve the Church!! Nice interview! Kudos Dr DeClue, very balanced perspective 😊
Can we not keep the "politics" out of this discussion? This guest, from past encounters, had one unpleasant opinion, it was his, it was right, and the other person was denigrated and/or ridiculed. He was a "real" doctor and categorized others as not, most subjectively.
Thank you for this wonderful interview. I can attest to the point that Novus Ordo masses are improving, and young people (and seminarians/young priests) are a large part of it. Pray for the Church.
This has been one of the best talks on Pints of Aquinas that I've seen in a long time (and there are a lot of good ones). Thank you both so very much! So much wisdom in the advice given, so much gentleness and at the same time truthfulness in the addressing of what's going on in the Church today, beautiful. I see the guidance of the Holy Spirit in this. Thank you so much, brethren!
I appreciate the V2 documents with the exception of "Nostra Aetate". It's about the caliber of a High School level book report on comparative religions. I heard that it was co-written by a priest who was undercover h*m*sexual. He later left the faith
This episode was edifying for both brain and soul. Bravo. You know, I came back to the church two years ago after drifting in sin for 25 years and it was pretty humiliating to know what a worm I was and am. But this discussion has also helped me to see how important a shield humility is in this ridiculous world. Let me never forget it.
Coming into communion with the Church in January. If I did not have the context that the Church could be more than what I saw at my geographically local parish, I am not confident I would be entering the Church, or at least not in the time or with the joyful heart that I am. The tradition and its beauty were a major evangelical tool in my story.
Glad to see this collaboration. This is exactly what the Church needs. Glad that there are prominent voices standing up for the truth, supporting each other, and subsequently supporting the confused laity like myself. Keep standing up to the doomsday cultists.
I love, LOVE this guest, Dr. Richard DeClue. His message is clear, simple and makes perfect sense. For me, the battles of Vatican 2 were a source of anxiety and confusion. Dr. DeClue flushes that confusion away. Thanks to both of you!!!
I appreciated Dr. DeClue’s precise language and efforts to stay faithful to what the Church actually teaches instead of passing off his opinions as I’ve seen too many others do. No one seems to be able to admit “I don’t know” anymore, so it was refreshing to see that in this interview. Excellent show with an excellent guest.
1:59:38 Very well said!!! Wow!!!! What DeClue says right there speaks to my heart... Sometimes, I feel like some people might see me as a "lukewarm" because I try to have hope in the actual state of THE CHURCH. I don't want to throw it to the garbage... I choose to be respectful and obedient. That does not mean to agree with everything. But sometimes I feel that the anger is over the board...
That's the bit that was complete garbage! I loved the way Fradd just sat there staring at him, clearly thinking "what the crap are you talking about bro?!"
@@davidmcpike8359 I think we agree on far more than our two comments suggest… of course I believe the hierarchy is currently off the rails, and if there’s going to be a schism of any sort happening- it will be when the current leaders sway so far liberal that they effectively become the schismatics, while many of the lay faithful stay firmly rooted in the tradition of the Holy Church of the last 2000 yrs!
@@davidmcpike8359 might sound a little weird/creepy, but I think I know far more about you than you know about me… Just outside of a big city in Alberta area by any chance?
@@davidmcpike8359 I’m friends of one of your brother in-laws who’s a fishing guide… my wife and I met through the Catholic community, and had Rosary nights at JN’s house… but please forgive me, because I’m no theologian.
@@Ahomesteadersdream Who knows? I don't foresee schism, I think that's just a cheap rhetorical attack: "Don't like my heresy? Then you're a schismatic!" Yeah, right. Nice argument. The silent apostasy in the Church is longstanding; it will be interesting to see what happens if the volume keeps getting turned up.
I struggled understanding this issue last year, and Jimmy Akin articles helped me so much find the authentic path to understanding what the Scripture, the Fathers, and the Magisterium all say.
The liturgy discussion on this is really quite basic, to be frank. There is an interim Missal of 1965 which is essentially the Traditional Mass with certain segments in the vernacular. but afterwards the Consilium is established which radically looks at the liturgy and takes into pieces then re-stitches it back together according to theories about how the early church liturgy was, which recent scholarship has refuted. Eg the reason the "send your holy spirit upon them like the dewfall" is present is because they thought the Roman Rite simply lost its epiclesis (invocation of the Holy Spirit) somewhere along the way, because Eastern liturgies have one. But there is no textual evidence of this in the history of the Rite. Similarly, new Eucharistic Prayers where added because Eastern Rites have multiple where the Roman Rite has only one, the only one it has ever had: the Roman Canon. This is the process by which the NOM is made, and it is a fundamental rupture with the liturgical tradition. The liturgical conversation more generally has to acknowledge this, or else we aren't going to get anywhere. The NOM is designed to be sequential and entirely audible because its creators thought comprehension of the liturgy by the people (in the sense of seeing and hearing everything) was fundamental to true participation. (it's also why versus populum and vernacular are universal now, as the established wisdom of the bishops who implement it). This is dubious at best. The entire liturgical project, from principles to implementation, is rife with problems, and I'm tired of all the talking heads pretending is only a matter of music being in poor taste. It goes a lot deeper than that. Versus Populum and vernacular liturgy were inaugurated by Pope Paul VI in 1965. see rorate-caeli.blogspot.com/2019/04/a-half-century-of-novelty-revisiting.html
The ordinariate mass that I attend is as close to being TLM but not. The priest is facing the tabernacle (and eastward), great traditional music, some Latin responsorials (sung/chanted), the traditional Kyrie, super solemn, and we have a communion rail! I am so glad that I found this parish close by. If I want to go to a diocesan TLM Missa Cantata I have to drive 30 minutes, versus 6 minutes. I thank the Franciscan brothers for putting great emphasis on solemnity and bringing in parts of the old style that are missing in my local parish (within walking distance). 🙏✝🙏
I'm a Millennial, I grew up with the NO, and my parents and I sang in an amazing choir at our church for many years. I love some of those songs. I love being able to sing along at Mass. I think Gregorian chant is also beautiful, but everyone's taste in music is different. Please don't assume no one likes the music being sung at NO Masses.
I don’t think that’s necessarily the argument, people just long for order because of this crazy world we live in. And if the Church teaches Gregorian chant has pride of place, we must submit with piety and respect.
This is a VERY good interview. I don’t think the power of mental prayer can be underestimated, particularly if there is change or renewal we seek to achieve.
What do you mean someday your soul is important too Jesus now not someday.i shall pray the Rosary for you please do it as soon as possibleGod Bless you.
There's a legend about the martiys under Dioclecian. One of those was Saint Expeditus. When he thought about become a Christian, the Devil took the form of a crow. When the crow cawed it sounded like the latin word "cras" (it mean tomorrow). Then, moved by the Holy Ghost Expeditus stamped on the bird and killed it, declaring, "Hodie" (today, now).
So much of the evidence for assertions made are things like “my mom told me” or “if I had to guess”. Good on Matt for pushing back on assertions backed up without much other than anecdotal evidence.
Guitars and other string instruments are really beautiful when done fingerstyle. We can see it in reconstructed Mozarabic chants/liturgy. It would do wonders to the faith if we could exchange the usual rocky/pop ballads and melodies that we do for some of the old styles of playing the guitar
Try to listen to the "Lamentación de Jeremías. Lección I De jueves Santo. Cap 1, 1-14. Antifonario Mozárabe de Silos (Burgos). Archivo de la Abadía, ms 9, Breviario de San Rosendo de Celanova" by Eduardo Paniagua, its the one 8 minutes long. A beautiful example of string instruments in service.
@jkdesesseintes I'm of this mind as well. A steel-string acoustic, chugging out chords to folk songs, trying to get everyone to sing along is appropriate for a campfire, not at the foot of the Cross; but a nylon-stringed fingerstyled accompaniment can make for some beautiful, calming, and contemplative music.
I appreciate the Humility and lack of condemnation of those "in the process", but at the same time identifying what should have been better. And now we need to do the better!
I think the beauty of the Latin Mass is the silence. IMHO it allows us to focus on God and the sacrifice of His Son. Sadly its pretty hard in some countries to find a TLM that is in communion with Rome. Hard but not impossible. As someone else said - Pray 🙏✝
Thank you for making the entire program (rather than parts) available to us learners. I am fascinated by the discussion of the pros and cons of Novus Ordo. As a child, Latin served only to lock me out of the beauty of the Mass. I was overjoyed when English could be used. Now, I am old enough (really old!) to appreciate the concept of the mass being offered to God rather than focused on a man in the person of the officiating priest. I want to learn more. I am so old, I studied Latin for three years in high school and I loved it.
26:26 I took my father (who altar served before Vatican II) to a TLM. He was so confused seeing the servers choreographed movements throughout the Mass. Because in all his years he had only ever served low Masses.
There was an older deacon I met who had served served low Mass before Vatican 2. He observed the high Mass at my parish and thought that it was all novelty.
Apparently, The Jesuits popularized the Low Mass all over the world, as the de-facto Latin Mass in the centuries preceding the Second Vatican Council. I think it was the ease with which it could be celebrated with minimal altar servers and no music that influenced this shift. The majority of Catholic parishes did not have the resources or finances for a pipe organ or for all the pomp and decor to offer a High Mass. The issue became that the Low Mass was the only type of Mass offered at parishes. The Sunday Mass was a Low Mass. A Catholic rarely, if ever, got to witness a High Mass. That's probably the reason why there was such a huge disconnect among many Catholics who attended Mass. It felt like the priest's Mass, more so than the faithful joining their sacrifices to the priest's sacrifice as he was offering it to God in Persona Christi.
The sickness in the predators in our church sent me away. One day sitting in my chair minding my own business I heard the thought, if you expect forgiveness you too must forgive. I found my way back a bit later. No decision I have ever made has felt more perfect than my decision to come back and be the Catholic I always wanted to be. To allow a little evil to drive us from our Church is a mis-direction that I am sure Satan thrives on.
Father Ripperger says that we don’t worship God the way *we* want to worship him; we worship God the way He wants to be worshiped. There’s a lot going on during the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass that could have been better expounded, explained . . . without completely dismantling the Mass, and creating something new.
There is a parish in the Archdiocese of Detroit (Old St. Mary's in Greektown) that does one novus ordo Mass per weekend in Latin, with a communion rail and choir. It's beautiful. Sadly, there hasn't been the revival that one would hope to see. The church is nearly empty every week. Once a month that Mass is tridentine instead, and there are always more people there. It's a very interesting thing!
I’m a Protestant, but I grew up Catholic going to the Novus Ordo every Sunday into my late 20s. Sometimes I wonder if I would be in a different place now had I been raised with the Latin Mass instead. I don’t think it can be overstated just how important reverence and transcendence is to faith.
You need to get back into the Church. Protestantism is absolutely bankrupt. Catholicism is at least a legitimate thing which we are facing challenges but there is something worth fighting for. There is no Christ in Protestantism it’s utterly dark and empty of God
Precious friend!! 🙏🏻 I read your comment that you were Catholic and now a Protestant. I’m 57 and just became Catholic this past Easter. ❤ Child of God, return to the Faith! The Eucharist is true!!! It’s only a symbol in the protestant faith! Saint Ignatius in 107ad stated that if you do not believe the Eucharist to be the body blood soul and divinity of Jesus Christ - you’re not in the Church! He was taught, ordained and discipled by John the apostle! 🙏🏻The mental gymnastics that one has to do to stay in the Protestant evangelical world is exhausting. All my life I had believed what people “ said about” the Catholic faith and studying for the last seven years, I found that they were all lies! Seriously , in the protestant and evangelical churches you can believe pretty much whatever you want about any of the doctrines ! Does that sound like Jesus?? Please, please return! Even with all of the problems, it still is the Church that Christ established! ❤🙏🏻 please just visit! You could go tomorrow morning! Please know that I will be praying for you! 🙏🏻Jesus told us Himself, the gates of hell would come against the Church, but would not prevail! I am putting you on my prayer list! Get ready ! I’m gonna pray Saints and Angels down to lead you home !The Lord Made sure I saw your comment! I was about to turn off my phone when I saw your comment on Pints for Aquinas. The date looks like it was about eight months ago that you made your comment. The Catholic Church is waiting for you! Please come home!❤🙏🏻Blessings!!!
For some of the liturgical questions that didn't get answered fully I highly recommend listening to Father Eric Gilbaugh. He was on Catholic Stuff You Should Know last year and talked specifically about the liturgical movement throughout the 20th century and how it came to a head in V2. He gives some more possible reasons why Versus Populum became so dominant: For one, it was thought that was direction early liturgies were done based on archeological discoveries. People thought it was a return to a more "authentic" orientation but, according to him, that has since been disproven after more study. Secondly, (and this come from Ratzinger) at St. Peter's basilica the Pope faces the congregation while doing mass with the altar separate from the wall. So people used mass at St. Peter's as a model for how to do mass with a free standing altar. The irony though is that the reason the Pope faces the people is in order to face East. St. Peter's couldn't be built with the nave behind the altar so they built it in front of it. Ratzinger says it was an architectural accident of history that mass at St. Peters is done facing the people - the true purpose was for the celebrant to face East. As for music, people may not realize how much of a tall order it was in the 70s to start doing sacred music. As they mentioned, the average parish had no music at mass. There likely weren't any existing choirs and the priests themselves probably didn't know how to chant well. So they had to learn something brand new. On top of that the musical books for the Mass (the Graduale Romanum and Simplex) were only published in Latin and largely ignored by translators. So when masses started to be done completely in the vernacular and hymns were permitted as a 4th option, people went down the path of least resistance and just chose to do hymns. To my knowledge there's no official liturgical translation in English for the Graduale Romanum or Simplex.
I read an article about anger addiction derives from the feeling of power. People feel powerless, alone and turn to these channels to feel validated, powerful, and not alone.
I live in a protestant country where Catholics are about 4% of the population or roughly 14k people. I live in a small town, and the only Catholic church we have serves the novus ordo mass, so I'm happy with what I can get! I've asked our parish priest if there is any chance to have the TLM in my country, and he said the local bishop would not allow it.
Not a shame. Most of what people love about the TLM (chant, ad oriented, altar rail etc) is what the Novus Ordo is supposed to be doing anyway. In my experience if you do these things at your Novus Ordo it's even better than TLM.
@@nealkriesterer I think I agree with you on that more than I disagree with you. What bothers me the most is the inconsistency of the mass. We have a fairly "traditional" minded priest and he incorporates latin into the mass every now and then, but it's most of the time in the vernacular. As my options are limited I'll take whatever I can get, but if I could choose I think I'd rather go to the TLM, for consistency and reverence (not that novus ordo can't be reverent).
Yeah but the inconsistency comes from people not following the rules - check out Jubilate Deo by Paul IV in 1974, he makes it very clear that Latin chant is supposed to be the music of the mass. If people didn't follow the rules for TLM it would be just as inconsistent.
@@nealkriesterer That's where we agree. But until I see that in the novus ordo my preference remains with the TLM. That's not the only reason I would choose the TLM. Like was discussed in this interview, the reason for the V2 changes may have been valid or called for, but the results have been disastrous in some areas. I think getting together and discussing the position of the church in the ever changing modern world is a conversation that needs to be had, but it does not mean changing the church according to the world. The church is not of this world, it is above it and things don't need changing. I get the sense that a lot of the attitudes of "the spirit of V2" have been "how can we appeal to the hip kids?" But in reality you see young people longing for the unmoved rock, the traditional and the sacred. If I had a time machine and would go back to any point of Catholic history and walk into any Catholic church anywhere in the world and recognise at least 90% of what goes on in there, then it is how it should be. But if it were all foreign to me, and looked nothing like the church I know now, then how can we call it Catholic?
Our bishop shut down the Latin mass a couple years ago. Our pastor does allow communion on the tongue and Agnes Dei to be sung in Sunday choir. We have 24/7 adoration. We still hear the bells at every mass, but incense is done for funerals.
Like a lot of “Vatican II questions answered” content, I found this to be underwhelming. I think Matt threw a lot of pulled a lot of punches with his questions. 1. Why was the council necessary? Yes the world changed but what exactly was the issue? If I’m not mistaken, Ecumenical councils are set to address a particular problem. 2. Dr. DeClue gave a lot of “the council wasn’t implemented correct” without an explanation of WHY it wasn’t. 3. If the council implementation was taken so far out of left field, why do we have Pope JPII kissing the Quran, widespread liturgical abuse, a second iconoclasm, and widespread teaching of false ecumenism etc. post Vatican II 4. Why does it seem the church hierarchy is so against anything traditional while giving a pass/promoting open heretics who want change the faith? I’m not saying these questions don’t have answers. But when you claim you’re going to “Answer Vatican II questions” I expected more than the cookie cutter “well technically that wasn’t supposed to happen” answers we always get. The best Dr. DeClue could do many times when given the slightest pushback was “I don’t know, I’m not an expert”, “trads have a poor prayer life”, and “the priests used to say the mass really fast so we needed a council”. Give me a break.
When I say I don’t know why, I mean that I don’t know why there wasn’t proper oversight. I give some possible reasons, but it doesn’t change the fact that the Council wasn’t implemented properly, which is my point. Asking me why other people didn’t do their job is somewhat irrelevant. The fact that they didn’t is what’s important. And I even say that we have to admit that trads have legitimate complaints that no one is addressing and that that’s bad.
@@decluesviews2740 I very much appreciate your reply and Happy Thanksgiving. I think the heart of Trads concerns is that the lack of proper oversight and implementation seems deliberate. I really think the way forward is for the Church at large to stop demonizing Trads and stop the gaslighting. (I think of Michael Lofton) and for Trads to call out the extremists in there own tribe (I think Brian Holdsworth). Again, I appreciate you being a voice in the conversation even if we might not 100% agree. Its a good reminder we're all on the same team.
@@decluesviews2740 "Why there wasn't proper oversight"? Maybe because it was deliberate. Such a sudden and universal change could not have occurred without the approval of the Pope and bishops. A universal effect requires a universal cause and Rome is the only universal cause we have in the Church.
Richard's request at the 1:45:18 mark is already done here in Nigeria. Well here in Lagos. Either First or Last Sunday of the month. Apart from the readings and sermon it is mostly Latin.
"The virtue is the mean between two vices. You can fail to have virtue by excess or privation." Well said. I tell my son that every good has a sin on either side. And C.S. Lewis said it in The Screwtape Letters before either of us.
I entered my parish back in 2021 before they changed priest, and I loved it. It was very serious, and very reverent. and I was excited to enter that church, but then everything changed and the new pastor came in and new priest, and it became almost like a joke. It was very protestant like. I’ve gone to protestant churches, and I felt like I was in a protestant church I still received my sacraments, but I remember how uncomfortable I was when I was receiving them. They have masses where they play jazz. And it feels like almost disrespectful because they’re playing this loud jazz music while the bread and wine is turning to the body and blood of Christ and you can’t even pay attention because of music so loud. I found a new church though, but it’s kind of far and it’s in the city, but I went yesterday and I absolutely loved it. It was silent and you could just tell that the people that were there really believed in the true presence of Christ in the Eucharist. I absolutely loved it and will be going back, but I understand the struggle of people who are frustrated with their parishes, it doesn’t even seem like I’m in a Catholic Church sometimes I have to sit there and make myself realize you’re in a Catholic church not a protestant church
Longtime listener, first time commenter….. THANK YOU for including this perspective. Matt, you do a great job of challenging any guest you have on their views, but I’m so glad Dr Declue stood by his beliefs and the Church. I came back to the faith a few years ago after almost a decade away and was nearly turned off the faith again by the aggressive attacks on Pope Francis by people who claim to be Catholic that seem to have overrun Catholic social media. It was only once I unplugged from Daily Wire (very sad that is the representation of Catholics that most non-Catholics will see) and certain RUclipsrs and began engaging more with regular faithful Catholics IRL that I realized how much harm some of the more “traditionalist” content can do to individuals and church unity. For me the streams of vitriol were replaced by Archbishop Fulton Sheen recordings, Mother Angelica and Bishop Barron for my drive to work and my life feels so much more peaceful.
Okay, hilarious story, I wore some old painting sweats to the dealership as part of my strategy to get honest service and low price. 1.5 HOURS…not one salesman came. Finally I approached a sales person and asked to see the sales manager who showed up expecting a ‘scene’. I walked over to the truck I wanted and opened up my fanny pack (yep, dad outfit all the way) and showed him the cash I brought to pay in full. He became sooooo helpful. I had to tell him that while I was waiting I had the time to order the truck of my choice online and was having it delivered. I suggested he talk to his sales staff about expectations. I did go back and open a commercial fleet account for our farm later on but it seemed like the right thing to do to establish dominance first before actually doing business. (In a Christian way of course…lol)
Boom 💥 Love your story!! It’s like the male and more moral version of the scene in Pretty Woman when she’s shopping on Sunset Boulevard. Nice uplifting lesson for your car dealership 😊
I’m a convert to the church, i was received into the church at the Easter vigil and what I find interesting is that I find both traditional masses and the more modern mass to be reverent. But I guess that’s just because of my non reverent Protestant background
As a resident of the Archdiocese of Detroit, living in the city of Detroit, I can say that there are multiple parishes in the city near me that are reverent Ordinary Form diocesan parishes (many of them also offer the TLM). I think what has made these parishes able to be successful in regards to liturgical reverence and accuracy according to the prescribed rubrics is that through the 70's, 80's, and 90's, these parishes lost many members to the suburbs. These churches that were built to hold 1000 people would pull 150 for Sunday Mass. What happened through this, though, is that the remaining people at the parish, clearly devoted to their church and to the faith, would be able to build almost a new parish, which was able more fully to realize the goals of Vatican II, especially as it pertains to the liturgy. Instead of having to reform a parish of 700 families, some of which wanted the clown liturgies and felt banners everywhere, pastors could reform a parish of 200 people who were, and are, devoted to their church and THE Church. As we are now seeing, nearly all of these parishes in the city have growing communities of young adults who take their faith seriously and want to be holy sons and daughters of God, above all else. Now, of course, this is a generalization, but by and large, this rule holds here in Detroit, and I suspect it is the case in many other cities.
this is a very good point! I used to live in the city and enjoyed attending mass there due to the diversity and yes, as a result of the different ethnicity and races there was definitely a sense that the parishioners took their faith more seriously., My parish now, although in the suburbs is not so monotone and we get to experience some of that urban flavor. But the most important thing is the pastor. We just got a new one who came from the city and he truly is energetic in his love and passion for the Lord. I'm certain his ministry and faith was nourished and fed by his former parishioners who were a polyglot mix and worshiped more from the heart than the intellect.
One takeaway from this is to not give up on the good buildings. Do not allow some 100+ year old beautiful cathedral go bankrupt. If churches in your diocese are getting closed, make sure it's the suburban carpeted ones with everyone in a circle.
2:08:54 Nailed it. I’ve had to unsubscribe from certain channels because of this tendency it creates in me. And I really struggle with knowing if I’m demonstrating righteous anger or pride. So difficult. Jesus didn’t hold back to offer scathing words to the Pharisees and yet we are also told to ‘learn from Me for I am meek and humble of heart’. We have brains to use to discern between good, evil, error etc and yet without love we are totally useless. Matt identifies with astute precision how our human hearts can be prone to malice even when condemning what we know is wrong in the Church or in public figures. I think Richard and Matt are spot on in that the answer is prayer. The more we are personally united to Christ the more our hearts are balanced. Pray for me!
Re Vatican II: "By their fruits ye will know them." The Church ALWAYS needs renewal, but I remember as a child my parents and their intellectual Catholic friends saying "They are asking for trouble." They sure got it.
i like how the Ecumenical Council of Vienne say muslims are Faithless and they pray to Mahomet, while V2 says they worship God, ill go to the grave denying v2
I guess by now you both know that Voris resigned and why he resigned. Dr. Richard is absolutely correct in putting forward mental prayer and a deeper prayer life in general for all of us.
Without being diesrespectful, but how can one not realise that none of these points critisised in the preconciliar council actually has gotten any better? I mean yes maybe many masses were fast and many people went there more because of cultural reasons, but is that worse than having less than 5% (in my country) of catholics even attending mass, and even if you attend there is a possibility of severe sacrilege in your mass (like women preaching or gay blessings etc...)? Sure the council is not the root of these problems, but it did not succeed in figthing any of these problems and it very much seems like, at least its implementation actually made it worse in some cases.
Hello from Finland. We actually have an early latin Novus Ordo Holy Mass in 7 in the morning, it isn't Ad Orientum though. But in our parish communion is recieved only on tounge because of two substances. Our Polish prists are great) ❤❤❤
Was happy to hear Douglas Bushman STL mentioned at 2:29. He was my professor at the University of Dallas in the 90’s and besides being a Thomist extraordinaire he also cleared up for us all the nonsense circulating at the time about Vatican II. At the time “the spirit of Vatican II” line was bandied about to justify doing the exact opposite of what the Council actually taught.
At the religious community where I go to Mass, today we were in a different chapel, where the altar was against the wall, we had a Novus Ordo mass with the priest facing away. Perfectly fine
1:17:52 Regarding the (unaudible) readings in latin: I heard one explanation, that nowadays we tend to look at the readings from our present perspective and treat them like a lesson, educational aspect, that we need to hear and understand them and make some conclusions, but in the old mass they were more like a hymn of praise to God. The first readings often repeated, they were usually from the Book of Wisdom and depicted some aspects of Wisdom (and thus of God). Because of that, like the prayers, they didn't need to be heard by the people. I don't fully agree with this explanation, I feel like it's more of a try to explain an error (neglecting the proclamation of the Word of God loud and clear enough) afterwards, but I also think that there is some truth in the idea that the readings are not only 'educational', but also have a value of prayer, God's Word becoming alive when it's proclaimed aloud in this exact moment and place.
I've been looking for the words to describe what Dr DeClue said in this interview. It seems to me (and I'm by no means the interpreter of all things) that what we see today in terms of liturgical "chaos" is really a laying open of what was interiorly the case before VII. I would love to see a return to the TLM in the Roman Church (lex orandi, lex credendi after all) but I also am willing to believe that the Novus Ordo is meant to teach us a lesson, to help us to become a truly Catholic people who could be entrusted with the TLM. I suppose only time will tell.
I’m far for an expert on why the priest started facing the people, I’ve heard the argument that it was because there was a lot lack of instruction, and so people took notes from how it was done in Saint Peter’s where the priest did face the people, however I do know that the reason for moving the altar from the wall, is so that it can be incensed from all sides as opposed to one, this probably is compounding on the distinction of the place of repose and the place of sacrifice. However, this is the argument I’ve heard of specifically., as it is an inspiration taken from the east, which was the inspiration behind much of the reforms in Sacrosanctum Concillium
If you have a link to it, that'd be interesting. I think that if one looks at a country like Mexico (though my experience has been pretty limited), he could get an idea of what Ratzinger was talking about. There is lots of fuss about baptisms, first communions, and confirmations, but when it comes to fidelity, a lot of people really don't seem to be devout. At least, that's my take from my limited perspective.
I appreciate Dr. DeClue’s perspective (always good to hear a variety of points of view), however I would challenge some of the general assertions he made on a few, particular topics. He gives the usual ‘spiel’ that I’ve heard from others before, and he does so quite well; however there are those who have claimed the opposite (at least on some points). For example, Michael Davies, who was a champion of traditional Liturgy and orthodoxy, years ago, did an interview on the British tv program called, “Firing Line,”(in 1980) along with Malachi Martin (and another Priest from America from the state of New York who studied at Yale & Notre Dame); and Michael Davies showed that the liturgical changes which were forced upon the lay faithful of the time period, were not wanted or even received well by the majority of the laity (although it was presented as such). It was in fact, an enthusiastic project by a strong minority of clergy, against the wishes and desires of the overwhelming majority of the laity. To be sure, there were those among the laity who welcomed and embraced the changes with enthusiasm, and these people were often the voices which were promoted, while ignoring the majority of voices who opposed the changes, however they were by far in the overwhelming minority. You can find the particular episode of “Firing Line” with Michael Davies and Malachi Martin on RUclips if you care to watch it. It’s quite an interesting discussion. Also look up, “The Ecumaniacs” on RUclips. Some very good information on that video as well.
What you said here doesn’t really contradict anything I said. In fact, I even said it was top down (regarding versus populum) because the people didn’t ask for it. I saw that firing line episode. But I am talking about the Council itself, what the documents actually say, and I explicitly say that a lot of what happened (especially regarding the Liturgy) was NOT what Sacrosanctum Concilium called for. I am not an expert on liturgical theology, so I don’t enter into much about questions about why or how the changes that were made were made. I’m merely pointing out where what happened didn’t follow the Council on several points.
@@decluesviews2740 Fair enough. Yet there are those who would argue that the documents themselves were deliberately formulated to be ambiguous, including Sacrosanctum Concilium. Fr. Anthony Cekada (who was a well known sedevacantist) produced some videos based on his book, “Work of Human Hands (regarding the New Mass). Have a watch and let me know what you think?
My devout catholic father left Catholic boarding school in 1960 notes that he got through 6 years of Catholic education with little idea of the catechism
Lack of formation is definitely not a post-V2 phenomena.
There has never been a better time for formation that now. This is and will be a golden age for Catholicism. It’s genuinely exciting
why do I feel the same way! it’s so exciting to be a catholic this year. I feel like we have gone from sleeping to know starting to educate and fight back from all lies that was spread about us. ❤️❤️
It's working on myself and half a dozen friends and family members! Pints has done wonders for my family.
@@j897xce Pints is helpful along the way, but caution is needed brother. It leads astray at critical turns. Let Pints lead you to the Apostolic Church, but jump instead to long held authors, traditions and the words of the holy Father, Pope Francis. Be alert to schism and apostasy
Here is some practical advice: if you want better music, ad orientem, altar rails: PRAY FOR IT. Yes, God answers these prayers. It happened at my parish.
This is fair. And a lot of people don't wanna put the hard work into it either.
Pray for it, but also pay for it. We have almost zero musicians who dedicate their careers to the Church. Even renowned Gregorian ensembles are secular or just university projects without tied to Rome. It's hard (and pricey) to even find organ masters or secular professionals and students who are truly learned in the Gregorian or polyphony/ars antiqua tradition.
With the passing of the old patronage system and the whole secularization and separation of the Church and States, we kinda lost our will and cultural pungency and the rest is history. It's nice that everyone wants Gregorian or to listen to a des Pres in a high mass, but who are we kidding? Things will not fall from the sky without a huge collective endeavor.
But things are moving and I am truly hopeful to see the Vii to its fullness. For an art like Gregorian Chant that was almost lost, had to be puzzled out by the Solesmes monks and now we have monthly releases of albums with incredible reconstructions and interpretations, we can only have hope again and do our parts too. Have a child or two that have that music intuition? Why not try to show him the Church's legacy?
Hope it helps!
I agree! I did midnight adoration to 3am every Friday for years and prayed for an altar rail. We got it! Ended up switching to the TLM but I’m glad it’s there.
Yes, pray for it! But also you can ask your local priest for certain things, like moving the tabernacle front and center and having kneelers available for communion. I’ve seen it implemented in local parishes from suggestion.
Pray! AND WORK. Seek out priests who want ROTR masses and SUPPORT THEM. Your local parish priest probably likes the status quo so you will need to find someone open to doing things a reverent way
I reverted from orthodoxy to catholicism because I live 30 min away from a FSSP parish. And 15 minutes from an orthodox catholic parish. So I can go to two lively parish full of faith and traditional wholesome faith and practice. The FSSP parish is full at every one of four masses on sunday. I am truly blessed! Glory to God!
Username does not check out in this case lol.
God bless the FSSP
What a huge blessing!!! SSPX and fssp are both equally 2 1/2 hours away from me…
They are full because they aren’t many of them.
They are full because they aren’t many of them.
It is my experience in my parish that older parishioners (60 and older) are primarily the ones who keep calling for "new"/popular music (and video screens!), because they think it will attract the young people. Ironically, the young people are the ones who crave the "old time" (Gregorian/traditional organ) music and more traditional celebration and involvement in the Mass. I think the oldsters (I'm 56, so I can cast dispersion) only knew the folk-singing, tambourine-playing hippie version of Mass from the '70's, and they think the "youngsters" of today also "need" the current cultural influence, instead of relying on the timeless mystery and Grace of the Holy Spirit to make the connection.
Absolutely right. In my parish we are doing a massive capital campaign which I am not donating to number one because we have nothing left after bills right now but number two because I strongly disagree what they are doing with the money. They are buying a property so that they can house the priest off site and turn the rectory into offices. NO, if you need more offices at all (which is questionable with remote work), then buy OFFICE SPACE off site so that the priest will be housed AT THE PARISH. They are spending millions on things that are harmful like that and then complain the young people aren’t donating the pennies they have to support it. In my commentary to the online survey I responded to suggested projects not to do those and instead install altar rails
I’m 59 and have been seeking traditional Mass, Ad Orientum, Chant, Incense, Communion in tongue, for over 30 years!!! Realizing its probably not going your way happen in my lifetime. But praying and fasting for our children and grandchildren…
@@NCR-rs8ie so true! I’m 76 and can’t drive to a TLM. I’m sick of hearing “we” want the N.O. Changes! Do we not go to mass if we cannot get to a reverent TLM? Watch it on TV?
1:44:47 I agree. I am a new Catholic (2023) and I just went to my first Traditional Latin Mass. It was so beautiful and I cannot wait to go back again!
The Latin Mass was packed at 7:30 am on Sunday, compared the Novous Ordo that I had been going to for years on Saturday at 4 pm and Sunday at 12 pm. I was so surprised at how many people my age and younger were there! Absolutely wonderful! 😍
I’m a staunch traditionalist, a convert from evangelical Protestantism, and I accept Vatican II in its entirety. It just saddens me that it was so sensationalized and poorly implemented. What Vatican II was and what was put in place are two different things.
EXACTLY!
Until recently, no ordinary Catholic was able to read Vatican II. It's now a thick paperback almost as long as the Catechism. So liberal Catholics beat us over the head with their interpretations/false reports of Vatican II. They just recently quit, but they've had decades to work their agenda using Vatican II as cover. This is how I remember it, and I was born in 1959.
It was intentional and premaditated deception
@@vasjapremerl7270?
@@vasjapremerl7270no it wasn't. Stop committing the sin of slander.
What they said about music in the liturgy around 1:19:00 and 1:32:30 was so spot on. If you read Sacrosanctum Concilium, it very clearly states that SACRED music shall have pride of place, and Gregorian Chant, polyphony, and the ORGAN are the most appropriate methods to use for music in the liturgy. I'm a cantor at my parish and I've been trying to communicate this to the music director.
This is my biggest beef with my church and the others in my area. How these pastors fail to realize the truth of this is beyond me.
The document is riddled with exceptions. Chris Ferarra in his article "Sacrosanctum Concilium: A Lawyer examines the loopholes" demonstrates that every percieved "abuse" has a loophole in the council document allowing for it. eg. "In 1964, only a year after SC was enacted, Pope Paul VI issued his motu proprio entitled Sacram Liturgiam. Article 9 of Sacram Liturgiam authorized all national hierarchies to approve vernacular translations of the Mass, subject only to Rome's ex post facto approval, which was given in every case. So much for the "use of Latin" in the Roman liturgy. The "particular law" exception swallowed up this much-vaunted "conservative" norm within a year, as Bugnini clearly knew it would. Anyone who says that Article 36 of SC has been "violated" and the Council "disobeyed" by reason of the all-vernacular new liturgy has never read SC in its entirety, or is pretending that two Popes and nearly the entire hierarchy have not already shown us that SC authorizes (even if it does not mandate) Mass entirely in the vernacular.
Arts. 114-116 - "[114] . . . The treasury of sacred music is to be preserved and cultivated with great care." [Art. 116] - ". . . other things being equal [Gregorian chant] should be given pride of place in liturgical services . . ."
The phrase "other things being equal" partially undermines the phrase "pride of place," and the remaining provisions of SC (discussed below) complete the undermining by vesting "territorial ecclesiastical authority" with total control over the adaptation of church music to "local needs," along with the rest of the liturgy."
salbert.tripod.com/SClel.htm
What does it say in the Psalms though? Harp? Flute? Trumpet? Lyre? Why not praise God with these as the Psalms say?
You're right, but we can rightly ask why it went so bad and so bland in all places at exactly the same time.
@@gerry30😅
Dr. DeClue is so delightful thanks for having him on the show!!!!! My favourite episode so far!
I consider myself traditional, and I am of the opinion that criticism of Vatican II is largely anti-traditionalist. The Church has the power to call these councils and we as obedient members should follow their lead. We should operate from the assumption that our interpretation is uncharitable or wrong, not that our leaders have done wrong. That is, imo, the traditional approach. And as I’ve dug into this issue, that opinion has only been affirmed
Yes! Yes! and Yes! Confusion comes about when people start disobeying. Obedience is important and a hallmark of Saints.
@@RosaIbanez-m3y Vatican I calls for "true hierarchical obedience" that is qualified according to St. Thomas Aquinas' teaching on 3 types of obedience, perfect, true and false obedience. Confusion actually comes from when people obey indiscriminately. And this is how we have come to where we are now with a Pope that elevates James Martin and throws Cardinal Burke out into the outer darkness.
There is nothing "traditional' about slavish and indiscriminate servile obedience. Lateran IV called for Jews to be forced to wear identifying dress and not to be seen in public during the Triduum and other holy days. The Catholics of the day simply ignored the decrees of Lateran IV. When Pope Stephen VI, had the corpse of Pope Formosus dug up, put on trial with a deacon assigned to provide answers for the corpse, the deacon was fully in his moral rights to defy the order. Pope Stephen legally declared Formosus to have been an invalid Pope and declared all of his ordinations invalid. This was overturned and then ratified, and overturned again through a few cycles by subsequent Popes. St. Thomas Aquinas teaches a 3 fold obedience, perfect, true and false obedience. You are morally obligated to oppose being falsely obedient. Pope Benedict as Joseph Ratzinger stated in Principles of Theology that some councils had been a complete waste of time. He thought time would tell, and he hoped that Vatican II wouldn't be one of those, but it's likely and not a heresy to believe it was just that.
@@gerry30 Pope Francis has done nothing to deserve disobedience. I understand discernment and he has done nothing to deserve disobedience.
St Thomas distinguishes three levels of obedience: “one, sufficient for salvation, and consisting in obeying when one is bound to obey; secondly, perfect obedience, which obeys in all things lawful; thirdly, indiscreet obedience, which obeys even in matters unlawful”. The last of these is thus not an act of virtue but falls short of the good that motivates all virtuous acts.
Pope Francis has done nothing unlawful and has asked nothing unlawful from us Catholics.
@@RosaIbanez-m3y Says you. Francis is overtly NOT confirming the brethren and he is deliberately giving stones instead of bread. His scandals are growing epic in scale and number. From his early "beach ball" on the altar scandals to his Pachamama offenses against the First Commandment. If St. Peter was resisted to his face as described in the infallible testimony of St. Paul for merely being intimidated by Jews, how much more of a rebuke and resistance is Francis deserving of?
I'm a Protestant from a very anti-Catholic denomination. Im investigating the Catholic church and started to attend Mass. I would never attend a Novus Odo mass again. Every chapel i went to was the same when in came ro rhe Novus Odo
1). Every was 150 year old.
2). People dressed in whatever way they want
3). Lay people giving the eucherist to the faithful.
Worsw, in one Mass, there was a Native American dance. For a month now, ive been attending traditional mass at a kicall FSSP Chapel. You can see the difference not only in the Masses but also the people.
They're very young, have lots of children, and respect the Mass. If i convert, it will be all Latin Mass for me until they fix the Novus Odo
I am happy that these questions are being addressed in a more public and easily digestible way.
Matt asks a pre-post Vat II liturgy question.
Dr. Richard replies “I am not a liturgical scholar.”
@@bthemedia Yes, because I admit my areas of study. I am a dogmatic and fundamental (systematic) theologian. I was up front about that, so people know that when I talk about the history of rites, it is not my area of expertise. I can only give my opinion, or point out differendes between Sacrosanctum Concilium and the liturgy as you see it today.
@@decluesviews2740 This interview could not be a more clear sign of Vatican II. You were a Catholic priest and gave my sister her First Holy Communion in the Charlotte Diocese. What a mess! Stop defending the conciliar church and the Novus Ordo Mass. The Second Vatican Council opened the door to Satan. Paul VI even admitted that the "Smoke of Satan" has entered the Church. You are a failed fruit of the Conciliar Church. Stop turning a blind eye to the Crisis in the Church!
#Vatican II #ApeChurch #SynodalChurch #NovusOrdo #NewReligion
I think Dr. DeClue is clueless. I lived through Vatican II and its aftermath. It has DESTROYED the Catholic Church. The Catholic Church has morphed into a different organization altogether: The Vatican II Sect. That's why I moved over to Eastern Orthodoxy. Thank Heaven that in Orthodoxy I don't have to worry about the next foot to drop! Each time when one of the "mainstream" bishops, cardinals or the pope speaks in their milquetoast and liberal ways, my reasons to leave are strongly re-enforced. Vatican II Sect, RIP.
@@bthemedia
An honest and humble reply! 😊
Excellent interview. I really appreciate the humility of Dr. Richard - he prefers to explain why he can't give a straight answer instead of pushing something confidently. And I like his line of clearing the understanding of words and sources before making a statement, with a charitable approach towards these who have good intentions even if they mix up some terms.
I grew up in NO and as a kid liked the happy clappy sappy mass, but now most seem like all the settings, actions, music of it work against belief in the sacrifice of the mass -- Christ the King giving himself to redeem us and feeding us himself in the Eucharist. Mostly NO masses are like penance to me. I attend our diocese low mass on Sundays and we have a sense that our priests greatly care for our souls by their actions and homilies, and we have a volunteer schola that chants so beautifully it brings tears of joy!
I love that now it's going for you and your family. I was introduced to the TLM in 2016. This was a Low Mass. And I was impressed from the get go. I didn't get to experience a High Mass until 2018 when I attended the Walk for Life with a couple of friends. Over the years I went on and off to the TLM Low Mass at my local diocesan chapel (not SSPX). This changed in 2022, when I started going more regularly. Attendance at the chapel skyrocketed in the time before I started attending regularly, that they had to move the TLM to the bigger Church. All thanks to the pandemic, I guess. A lot of Church's were shutting down. And the TLM was being offered outside, so many people from other localities started attending. Many never went back to their former parishes and stayed because of the TLM. I haven't gone back to my former parish either. I've found something beautiful with this community I'm now apart of.
I absolutely loved this episode. Dr. DeClue was fantastic. I hadn’t heard of him before. There’s so much goodness in here, and many many things I needed to hear personally. Thank you for this Matt & everyone at PWA!
“If your temptation is to usurp the rights of the Church hierarchy and authority and become its judge…. Every schismatic thought that they were the faithful remnant, every single one thought they were right and Rome was wrong” -- good luck with that!!!
Chose you this day whom you shall serve but as for me and my household we shall serve the Church!!
Nice interview! Kudos Dr DeClue, very balanced perspective 😊
deClue is fantastic. He's one of the guys on RUclips that brought me out of the Rad (Bad) Trad rabbit hole I'd gone down. Looking forward to this one!
Can we not keep the "politics" out of this discussion? This guest, from past encounters, had one unpleasant opinion, it was his, it was right, and the other person was denigrated and/or ridiculed. He was a "real" doctor and categorized others as not, most subjectively.
#ordonariate gang
Thank you for this wonderful interview. I can attest to the point that Novus Ordo masses are improving, and young people (and seminarians/young priests) are a large part of it. Pray for the Church.
Dr. Declue is a real one. We are blessed by him
This has been one of the best talks on Pints of Aquinas that I've seen in a long time (and there are a lot of good ones). Thank you both so very much! So much wisdom in the advice given, so much gentleness and at the same time truthfulness in the addressing of what's going on in the Church today, beautiful. I see the guidance of the Holy Spirit in this. Thank you so much, brethren!
Awesome discussion. More of these truths about the Council need to be emphasized. I was taken in by a lot of the common errors for years to my peril.
I appreciate the V2 documents with the exception of "Nostra Aetate". It's about the caliber of a High School level book report on comparative religions. I heard that it was co-written by a priest who was undercover h*m*sexual. He later left the faith
@@greyhoundmama2062
And we all know that gossip always turns out to be gospel!
This episode was edifying for both brain and soul. Bravo.
You know, I came back to the church two years ago after drifting in sin for 25 years and it was pretty humiliating to know what a worm I was and am. But this discussion has also helped me to see how important a shield humility is in this ridiculous world. Let me never forget it.
Praise god.
I have been crucified to eorld and world and world has been crucified to me.
Bless you! So glad you are back! 🙏🏻😀❤
Coming into communion with the Church in January. If I did not have the context that the Church could be more than what I saw at my geographically local parish, I am not confident I would be entering the Church, or at least not in the time or with the joyful heart that I am. The tradition and its beauty were a major evangelical tool in my story.
Thanks Matt! Great , balanced interview. Dr. DeClue is a breath of fresh air. I'm hoping that he has an increased presence on digital media.
Glad to see this collaboration. This is exactly what the Church needs. Glad that there are prominent voices standing up for the truth, supporting each other, and subsequently supporting the confused laity like myself. Keep standing up to the doomsday cultists.
I love, LOVE this guest, Dr. Richard DeClue. His message is clear, simple and makes perfect sense.
For me, the battles of Vatican 2 were a source of anxiety and confusion. Dr. DeClue flushes that confusion away.
Thanks to both of you!!!
I appreciated Dr. DeClue’s precise language and efforts to stay faithful to what the Church actually teaches instead of passing off his opinions as I’ve seen too many others do. No one seems to be able to admit “I don’t know” anymore, so it was refreshing to see that in this interview. Excellent show with an excellent guest.
1:59:38 Very well said!!! Wow!!!! What DeClue says right there speaks to my heart... Sometimes, I feel like some people might see me as a "lukewarm" because I try to have hope in the actual state of THE CHURCH. I don't want to throw it to the garbage... I choose to be respectful and obedient. That does not mean to agree with everything. But sometimes I feel that the anger is over the board...
1:56:55 - This part of the conversation… WOW! God have mercy on us! The entire interview was worth it just for these few minutes.
That's the bit that was complete garbage! I loved the way Fradd just sat there staring at him, clearly thinking "what the crap are you talking about bro?!"
@@davidmcpike8359 I think we agree on far more than our two comments suggest… of course I believe the hierarchy is currently off the rails, and if there’s going to be a schism of any sort happening- it will be when the current leaders sway so far liberal that they effectively become the schismatics, while many of the lay faithful stay firmly rooted in the tradition of the Holy Church of the last 2000 yrs!
@@davidmcpike8359 might sound a little weird/creepy, but I think I know far more about you than you know about me… Just outside of a big city in Alberta area by any chance?
@@davidmcpike8359 I’m friends of one of your brother in-laws who’s a fishing guide… my wife and I met through the Catholic community, and had Rosary nights at JN’s house… but please forgive me, because I’m no theologian.
@@Ahomesteadersdream Who knows? I don't foresee schism, I think that's just a cheap rhetorical attack: "Don't like my heresy? Then you're a schismatic!" Yeah, right. Nice argument. The silent apostasy in the Church is longstanding; it will be interesting to see what happens if the volume keeps getting turned up.
Yes! Your spiritual life and disposition should be our primary focus!
That was honestly the best talk ive heard about the "salvation outside the church" issue 💖
I struggled understanding this issue last year, and Jimmy Akin articles helped me so much find the authentic path to understanding what the Scripture, the Fathers, and the Magisterium all say.
Richard DeClue is awesome. Loved his talks with Matthew Minerd
Hey, Dwong. Does he have any books? Blog? Or just his channel?
@@arthurbringel8610He’s a writer with Word on Fire. I googled if he had any books, The Mind of Pope Benedict XVI.
Such a balanced view on V2!!!! DeClue is now on my new favorite theologian!!!
The liturgy discussion on this is really quite basic, to be frank.
There is an interim Missal of 1965 which is essentially the Traditional Mass with certain segments in the vernacular. but afterwards the Consilium is established which radically looks at the liturgy and takes into pieces then re-stitches it back together according to theories about how the early church liturgy was, which recent scholarship has refuted. Eg the reason the "send your holy spirit upon them like the dewfall" is present is because they thought the Roman Rite simply lost its epiclesis (invocation of the Holy Spirit) somewhere along the way, because Eastern liturgies have one. But there is no textual evidence of this in the history of the Rite. Similarly, new Eucharistic Prayers where added because Eastern Rites have multiple where the Roman Rite has only one, the only one it has ever had: the Roman Canon. This is the process by which the NOM is made, and it is a fundamental rupture with the liturgical tradition. The liturgical conversation more generally has to acknowledge this, or else we aren't going to get anywhere.
The NOM is designed to be sequential and entirely audible because its creators thought comprehension of the liturgy by the people (in the sense of seeing and hearing everything) was fundamental to true participation. (it's also why versus populum and vernacular are universal now, as the established wisdom of the bishops who implement it). This is dubious at best. The entire liturgical project, from principles to implementation, is rife with problems, and I'm tired of all the talking heads pretending is only a matter of music being in poor taste. It goes a lot deeper than that.
Versus Populum and vernacular liturgy were inaugurated by Pope Paul VI in 1965. see rorate-caeli.blogspot.com/2019/04/a-half-century-of-novelty-revisiting.html
This was a great discussion and thank you for the clarity on Vatican 2!
More stuff like this please.
This is gonna be so good. His call with Tim Gordon a few years ago remains my go-to for V2 doubts.
Do you know where I could find it?
@@mattmackinnan8557I think the video is called “Who is right about Vatican II” on Tim Gordon’s channel
@@Seethi_C Thank you so much! God bless!
FYI, DeClue has 6 part video lecture on V2 on the Word on Fire institute yt channel. There he takes a narrative approach to the coucil. Real worth it.
It's an absolute heater
Word on Fire is the Privileged Way to the Bank for their contributors.
Love these overlays on the screen adding context THURSDAY. Well done
Yes!! I loved that too
The ordinariate mass that I attend is as close to being TLM but not. The priest is facing the tabernacle (and eastward), great traditional music, some Latin responsorials (sung/chanted), the traditional Kyrie, super solemn, and we have a communion rail! I am so glad that I found this parish close by. If I want to go to a diocesan TLM Missa Cantata I have to drive 30 minutes, versus 6 minutes. I thank the Franciscan brothers for putting great emphasis on solemnity and bringing in parts of the old style that are missing in my local parish (within walking distance). 🙏✝🙏
This was an insightful and uplifting conversation - rare combo these days. Thank you both.
I'm a Millennial, I grew up with the NO, and my parents and I sang in an amazing choir at our church for many years. I love some of those songs. I love being able to sing along at Mass. I think Gregorian chant is also beautiful, but everyone's taste in music is different. Please don't assume no one likes the music being sung at NO Masses.
I don’t think that’s necessarily the argument, people just long for order because of this crazy world we live in. And if the Church teaches Gregorian chant has pride of place, we must submit with piety and respect.
This is a VERY good interview. I don’t think the power of mental prayer can be underestimated, particularly if there is change or renewal we seek to achieve.
I hope to become a catholic someday
What do you mean someday your soul is important too Jesus now not someday.i shall pray the Rosary for you please do it as soon as possibleGod Bless you.
I hope so too! I have gotten so many graces from being within the Church!! I wish everyonoe could have those same graces and more, besides!!
🙏
There's a legend about the martiys under Dioclecian. One of those was Saint Expeditus. When he thought about become a Christian, the Devil took the form of a crow. When the crow cawed it sounded like the latin word "cras" (it mean tomorrow). Then, moved by the Holy Ghost Expeditus stamped on the bird and killed it, declaring, "Hodie" (today, now).
take ur time, find a right moment you are most comfortable with and go with it, took me 21 years, our Lord is always waiting for you to come home
So much of the evidence for assertions made are things like “my mom told me” or “if I had to guess”. Good on Matt for pushing back on assertions backed up without much other than anecdotal evidence.
Guitars sounds as other string instruments are so beautiful. It should never be excluded from any Church liturgy.
Guitars and other string instruments are really beautiful when done fingerstyle. We can see it in reconstructed Mozarabic chants/liturgy. It would do wonders to the faith if we could exchange the usual rocky/pop ballads and melodies that we do for some of the old styles of playing the guitar
Try to listen to the "Lamentación de Jeremías. Lección I De jueves Santo. Cap 1, 1-14. Antifonario Mozárabe de Silos (Burgos). Archivo de la Abadía, ms 9, Breviario de San Rosendo de Celanova" by Eduardo Paniagua, its the one 8 minutes long. A beautiful example of string instruments in service.
I tried to post the link but I think RUclips blocked it
@jkdesesseintes I'm of this mind as well. A steel-string acoustic, chugging out chords to folk songs, trying to get everyone to sing along is appropriate for a campfire, not at the foot of the Cross; but a nylon-stringed fingerstyled accompaniment can make for some beautiful, calming, and contemplative music.
I appreciate the Humility and lack of condemnation of those "in the process", but at the same time identifying what should have been better. And now we need to do the better!
Dr deClue is great.
I always do my research before listening to any armchair theologian on social media
I think the beauty of the Latin Mass is the silence. IMHO it allows us to focus on God and the sacrifice of His Son. Sadly its pretty hard in some countries to find a TLM that is in communion with Rome. Hard but not impossible. As someone else said - Pray 🙏✝
Thank you for making the entire program (rather than parts) available to us learners. I am fascinated by the discussion of the pros and cons of Novus Ordo. As a child, Latin served only to lock me out of the beauty of the Mass. I was overjoyed when English could be used. Now, I am old enough (really old!) to appreciate the concept of the mass being offered to God rather than focused on a man in the person of the officiating priest. I want to learn more. I am so old, I studied Latin for three years in high school and I loved it.
Great interview - as always :) I like your way of talking. Ordinary conversation about extraordinary matters! Warm regards from Poland.
The fact thelogians used to be considered more mystical is interesting. I didn't know that. We need more of that honestly.
I needed to hear this! Thank you for educating us. It's always humbling when I'm faced with how very much I don't know about our Church.
Love the handheld incense they are using while discussing V2.
Best episode you had in a while, and you just had Ralph Martin on!
26:26 I took my father (who altar served before Vatican II) to a TLM. He was so confused seeing the servers choreographed movements throughout the Mass. Because in all his years he had only ever served low Masses.
There was an older deacon I met who had served served low Mass before Vatican 2. He observed the high Mass at my parish and thought that it was all novelty.
Apparently, The Jesuits popularized the Low Mass all over the world, as the de-facto Latin Mass in the centuries preceding the Second Vatican Council. I think it was the ease with which it could be celebrated with minimal altar servers and no music that influenced this shift. The majority of Catholic parishes did not have the resources or finances for a pipe organ or for all the pomp and decor to offer a High Mass. The issue became that the Low Mass was the only type of Mass offered at parishes. The Sunday Mass was a Low Mass. A Catholic rarely, if ever, got to witness a High Mass. That's probably the reason why there was such a huge disconnect among many Catholics who attended Mass. It felt like the priest's Mass, more so than the faithful joining their sacrifices to the priest's sacrifice as he was offering it to God in Persona Christi.
The sickness in the predators in our church sent me away. One day sitting in my chair minding my own business I heard the thought, if you expect forgiveness you too must forgive. I found my way back a bit later. No decision I have ever made has felt more perfect than my decision to come back and be the Catholic I always wanted to be. To allow a little evil to drive us from our Church is a mis-direction that I am sure Satan thrives on.
Father Ripperger says that we don’t worship God the way *we* want to worship him; we worship God the way He wants to be worshiped.
There’s a lot going on during the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass that could have been better expounded, explained . . . without completely dismantling the Mass, and creating something new.
There is a parish in the Archdiocese of Detroit (Old St. Mary's in Greektown) that does one novus ordo Mass per weekend in Latin, with a communion rail and choir. It's beautiful. Sadly, there hasn't been the revival that one would hope to see. The church is nearly empty every week. Once a month that Mass is tridentine instead, and there are always more people there. It's a very interesting thing!
I will visit them
I’m a Protestant, but I grew up Catholic going to the Novus Ordo every Sunday into my late 20s. Sometimes I wonder if I would be in a different place now had I been raised with the Latin Mass instead. I don’t think it can be overstated just how important reverence and transcendence is to faith.
You need to get back into the Church. Protestantism is absolutely bankrupt. Catholicism is at least a legitimate thing which we are facing challenges but there is something worth fighting for. There is no Christ in Protestantism it’s utterly dark and empty of God
Precious friend!! 🙏🏻 I read your comment that you were Catholic and now a Protestant. I’m 57 and just became Catholic this past Easter. ❤ Child of God, return to the Faith! The Eucharist is true!!! It’s only a symbol in the protestant faith! Saint Ignatius in 107ad stated that if you do not believe the Eucharist to be the body blood soul and divinity of Jesus Christ - you’re not in the Church! He was taught, ordained and discipled by John the apostle! 🙏🏻The mental gymnastics that one has to do to stay in the Protestant evangelical world is exhausting. All my life I had believed what people “ said about” the Catholic faith and studying for the last seven years, I found that they were all lies! Seriously , in the protestant and evangelical churches you can believe pretty much whatever you want about any of the doctrines ! Does that sound like Jesus?? Please, please return! Even with all of the problems, it still is the Church that Christ established! ❤🙏🏻 please just visit! You could go tomorrow morning! Please know that I will be praying for you! 🙏🏻Jesus told us Himself, the gates of hell would come against the Church, but would not prevail! I am putting you on my prayer list! Get ready ! I’m gonna pray Saints and Angels down to lead you home !The Lord Made sure I saw your comment! I was about to turn off my phone when I saw your comment on Pints for Aquinas. The date looks like it was about eight months ago that you made your comment. The Catholic Church is waiting for you! Please come home!❤🙏🏻Blessings!!!
“You can’t just gloss things over because you saw something on RUclips or some blog” - love it
For some of the liturgical questions that didn't get answered fully I highly recommend listening to Father Eric Gilbaugh. He was on Catholic Stuff You Should Know last year and talked specifically about the liturgical movement throughout the 20th century and how it came to a head in V2.
He gives some more possible reasons why Versus Populum became so dominant:
For one, it was thought that was direction early liturgies were done based on archeological discoveries. People thought it was a return to a more "authentic" orientation but, according to him, that has since been disproven after more study. Secondly, (and this come from Ratzinger) at St. Peter's basilica the Pope faces the congregation while doing mass with the altar separate from the wall. So people used mass at St. Peter's as a model for how to do mass with a free standing altar. The irony though is that the reason the Pope faces the people is in order to face East. St. Peter's couldn't be built with the nave behind the altar so they built it in front of it. Ratzinger says it was an architectural accident of history that mass at St. Peters is done facing the people - the true purpose was for the celebrant to face East.
As for music, people may not realize how much of a tall order it was in the 70s to start doing sacred music. As they mentioned, the average parish had no music at mass. There likely weren't any existing choirs and the priests themselves probably didn't know how to chant well. So they had to learn something brand new. On top of that the musical books for the Mass (the Graduale Romanum and Simplex) were only published in Latin and largely ignored by translators. So when masses started to be done completely in the vernacular and hymns were permitted as a 4th option, people went down the path of least resistance and just chose to do hymns. To my knowledge there's no official liturgical translation in English for the Graduale Romanum or Simplex.
Archaeologism is a liturgical error.
I read an article about anger addiction derives from the feeling of power. People feel powerless, alone and turn to these channels to feel validated, powerful, and not alone.
I live in a protestant country where Catholics are about 4% of the population or roughly 14k people. I live in a small town, and the only Catholic church we have serves the novus ordo mass, so I'm happy with what I can get! I've asked our parish priest if there is any chance to have the TLM in my country, and he said the local bishop would not allow it.
What a shame
Not a shame.
Most of what people love about the TLM (chant, ad oriented, altar rail etc) is what the Novus Ordo is supposed to be doing anyway. In my experience if you do these things at your Novus Ordo it's even better than TLM.
@@nealkriesterer I think I agree with you on that more than I disagree with you. What bothers me the most is the inconsistency of the mass. We have a fairly "traditional" minded priest and he incorporates latin into the mass every now and then, but it's most of the time in the vernacular. As my options are limited I'll take whatever I can get, but if I could choose I think I'd rather go to the TLM, for consistency and reverence (not that novus ordo can't be reverent).
Yeah but the inconsistency comes from people not following the rules - check out Jubilate Deo by Paul IV in 1974, he makes it very clear that Latin chant is supposed to be the music of the mass.
If people didn't follow the rules for TLM it would be just as inconsistent.
@@nealkriesterer That's where we agree. But until I see that in the novus ordo my preference remains with the TLM. That's not the only reason I would choose the TLM. Like was discussed in this interview, the reason for the V2 changes may have been valid or called for, but the results have been disastrous in some areas. I think getting together and discussing the position of the church in the ever changing modern world is a conversation that needs to be had, but it does not mean changing the church according to the world. The church is not of this world, it is above it and things don't need changing. I get the sense that a lot of the attitudes of "the spirit of V2" have been "how can we appeal to the hip kids?" But in reality you see young people longing for the unmoved rock, the traditional and the sacred. If I had a time machine and would go back to any point of Catholic history and walk into any Catholic church anywhere in the world and recognise at least 90% of what goes on in there, then it is how it should be. But if it were all foreign to me, and looked nothing like the church I know now, then how can we call it Catholic?
Our bishop shut down the Latin mass a couple years ago. Our pastor does allow communion on the tongue and Agnes Dei to be sung in Sunday choir. We have 24/7 adoration. We still hear the bells at every mass, but incense is done for funerals.
Saving this one for many future viewings. One of the best ever.
Like a lot of “Vatican II questions answered” content, I found this to be underwhelming. I think Matt threw a lot of pulled a lot of punches with his questions.
1. Why was the council necessary? Yes the world changed but what exactly was the issue? If I’m not mistaken, Ecumenical councils are set to address a particular problem.
2. Dr. DeClue gave a lot of “the council wasn’t implemented correct” without an explanation of WHY it wasn’t.
3. If the council implementation was taken so far out of left field, why do we have Pope JPII kissing the Quran, widespread liturgical abuse, a second iconoclasm, and widespread teaching of false ecumenism etc. post Vatican II
4. Why does it seem the church hierarchy is so against anything traditional while giving a pass/promoting open heretics who want change the faith?
I’m not saying these questions don’t have answers. But when you claim you’re going to “Answer Vatican II questions” I expected more than the cookie cutter “well technically that wasn’t supposed to happen” answers we always get.
The best Dr. DeClue could do many times when given the slightest pushback was “I don’t know, I’m not an expert”, “trads have a poor prayer life”, and “the priests used to say the mass really fast so we needed a council”.
Give me a break.
When I say I don’t know why, I mean that I don’t know why there wasn’t proper oversight. I give some possible reasons, but it doesn’t change the fact that the Council wasn’t implemented properly, which is my point. Asking me why other people didn’t do their job is somewhat irrelevant. The fact that they didn’t is what’s important. And I even say that we have to admit that trads have legitimate complaints that no one is addressing and that that’s bad.
@@decluesviews2740 I very much appreciate your reply and Happy Thanksgiving.
I think the heart of Trads concerns is that the lack of proper oversight and implementation seems deliberate.
I really think the way forward is for the Church at large to stop demonizing Trads and stop the gaslighting. (I think of Michael Lofton)
and for Trads to call out the extremists in there own tribe (I think Brian Holdsworth).
Again, I appreciate you being a voice in the conversation even if we might not 100% agree. Its a good reminder we're all on the same team.
@@decluesviews2740 "Why there wasn't proper oversight"? Maybe because it was deliberate. Such a sudden and universal change could not have occurred without the approval of the Pope and bishops. A universal effect requires a universal cause and Rome is the only universal cause we have in the Church.
Fascinating episode so far - I have so many thoughts and questions!
I truly appreciated this discussion of councils. Great introduction to history in our church.
Richard's request at the 1:45:18 mark is already done here in Nigeria. Well here in Lagos.
Either First or Last Sunday of the month. Apart from the readings and sermon it is mostly Latin.
"The virtue is the mean between two vices. You can fail to have virtue by excess or privation." Well said.
I tell my son that every good has a sin on either side.
And C.S. Lewis said it in The Screwtape Letters before either of us.
Yes, I got it from Aristotle.
Im bringing a few friends into the Church. This video has been so helpful! Thanks for all the clarity, hard work, and thoughtful insight.
I entered my parish back in 2021 before they changed priest, and I loved it. It was very serious, and very reverent. and I was excited to enter that church, but then everything changed and the new pastor came in and new priest, and it became almost like a joke. It was very protestant like. I’ve gone to protestant churches, and I felt like I was in a protestant church I still received my sacraments, but I remember how uncomfortable I was when I was receiving them. They have masses where they play jazz. And it feels like almost disrespectful because they’re playing this loud jazz music while the bread and wine is turning to the body and blood of Christ and you can’t even pay attention because of music so loud. I found a new church though, but it’s kind of far and it’s in the city, but I went yesterday and I absolutely loved it. It was silent and you could just tell that the people that were there really believed in the true presence of Christ in the Eucharist. I absolutely loved it and will be going back, but I understand the struggle of people who are frustrated with their parishes, it doesn’t even seem like I’m in a Catholic Church sometimes I have to sit there and make myself realize you’re in a Catholic church not a protestant church
Longtime listener, first time commenter….. THANK YOU for including this perspective. Matt, you do a great job of challenging any guest you have on their views, but I’m so glad Dr Declue stood by his beliefs and the Church. I came back to the faith a few years ago after almost a decade away and was nearly turned off the faith again by the aggressive attacks on Pope Francis by people who claim to be Catholic that seem to have overrun Catholic social media. It was only once I unplugged from Daily Wire (very sad that is the representation of Catholics that most non-Catholics will see) and certain RUclipsrs and began engaging more with regular faithful Catholics IRL that I realized how much harm some of the more “traditionalist” content can do to individuals and church unity. For me the streams of vitriol were replaced by Archbishop Fulton Sheen recordings, Mother Angelica and Bishop Barron for my drive to work and my life feels so much more peaceful.
Okay, hilarious story, I wore some old painting sweats to the dealership as part of my strategy to get honest service and low price. 1.5 HOURS…not one salesman came. Finally I approached a sales person and asked to see the sales manager who showed up expecting a ‘scene’. I walked over to the truck I wanted and opened up my fanny pack (yep, dad outfit all the way) and showed him the cash I brought to pay in full. He became sooooo helpful. I had to tell him that while I was waiting I had the time to order the truck of my choice online and was having it delivered. I suggested he talk to his sales staff about expectations. I did go back and open a commercial fleet account for our farm later on but it seemed like the right thing to do to establish dominance first before actually doing business. (In a Christian way of course…lol)
Wut
Boom 💥
Love your story!! It’s like the male and more moral version of the scene in Pretty Woman when she’s shopping on Sunset Boulevard. Nice uplifting lesson for your car dealership 😊
1:17:23 another W for the personal ordinariate, we LOVE to see it!
I’m a convert to the church, i was received into the church at the Easter vigil and what I find interesting is that I find both traditional masses and the more modern mass to be reverent. But I guess that’s just because of my non reverent Protestant background
As a resident of the Archdiocese of Detroit, living in the city of Detroit, I can say that there are multiple parishes in the city near me that are reverent Ordinary Form diocesan parishes (many of them also offer the TLM). I think what has made these parishes able to be successful in regards to liturgical reverence and accuracy according to the prescribed rubrics is that through the 70's, 80's, and 90's, these parishes lost many members to the suburbs. These churches that were built to hold 1000 people would pull 150 for Sunday Mass. What happened through this, though, is that the remaining people at the parish, clearly devoted to their church and to the faith, would be able to build almost a new parish, which was able more fully to realize the goals of Vatican II, especially as it pertains to the liturgy. Instead of having to reform a parish of 700 families, some of which wanted the clown liturgies and felt banners everywhere, pastors could reform a parish of 200 people who were, and are, devoted to their church and THE Church. As we are now seeing, nearly all of these parishes in the city have growing communities of young adults who take their faith seriously and want to be holy sons and daughters of God, above all else. Now, of course, this is a generalization, but by and large, this rule holds here in Detroit, and I suspect it is the case in many other cities.
this is a very good point! I used to live in the city and enjoyed attending mass there due to the diversity and yes, as a result of the different ethnicity and races there was definitely a sense that the parishioners took their faith more seriously., My parish now, although in the suburbs is not so monotone and we get to experience some of that urban flavor. But the most important thing is the pastor. We just got a new one who came from the city and he truly is energetic in his love and passion for the Lord. I'm certain his ministry and faith was nourished and fed by his former parishioners who were a polyglot mix and worshiped more from the heart than the intellect.
One takeaway from this is to not give up on the good buildings.
Do not allow some 100+ year old beautiful cathedral go bankrupt. If churches in your diocese are getting closed, make sure it's the suburban carpeted ones with everyone in a circle.
@@nealkriesterer We're doing our best to maintain them and keep them open to bring people to the Lord!
2:08:54 Nailed it. I’ve had to unsubscribe from certain channels because of this tendency it creates in me. And I really struggle with knowing if I’m demonstrating righteous anger or pride. So difficult. Jesus didn’t hold back to offer scathing words to the Pharisees and yet we are also told to ‘learn from Me for I am meek and humble of heart’.
We have brains to use to discern between good, evil, error etc and yet without love we are totally useless. Matt identifies with astute precision how our human hearts can be prone to malice even when condemning what we know is wrong in the Church or in public figures.
I think Richard and Matt are spot on in that the answer is prayer. The more we are personally united to Christ the more our hearts are balanced. Pray for me!
Im so glad i listened to this. Thank you.
Can’t wait for this one!
Thanks so much for this. Really clarifying and helpful. Glad to see Matt so open to learning from this Dr.
Much love for Matt addressing the elephant in the room of so many seeking refuge in the East, Latin, and the Ordinariate.
Edifying, thank you both for this. God bless 🕊 ❤️
This interview is amazing! Thank you so much!
I think a good background explanation comes from Bishop Barron discussing “1917” with Brandon Vought. Great explanation of society.
I have been waiting for you to interview Dr. DeClue for a long time. This will be fantastic I am sure!
Re Vatican II: "By their fruits ye will know them." The Church ALWAYS needs renewal, but I remember as a child my parents and their intellectual Catholic friends saying "They are asking for trouble." They sure got it.
seethe.
i like how the Ecumenical Council of Vienne say muslims are Faithless and they pray to Mahomet, while V2 says they worship God, ill go to the grave denying v2
Your Chanel is top notch Mat! 👍 This interview is really is amazing💥 🎸🙌 CHEERS from the Shenandoah valley
I guess by now you both know that Voris resigned and why he resigned. Dr. Richard is absolutely correct in putting forward mental prayer and a deeper prayer life in general for all of us.
Without being diesrespectful, but how can one not realise that none of these points critisised in the preconciliar council actually has gotten any better? I mean yes maybe many masses were fast and many people went there more because of cultural reasons, but is that worse than having less than 5% (in my country) of catholics even attending mass, and even if you attend there is a possibility of severe sacrilege in your mass (like women preaching or gay blessings etc...)?
Sure the council is not the root of these problems, but it did not succeed in figthing any of these problems and it very much seems like, at least its implementation actually made it worse in some cases.
Hello from Finland. We actually have an early latin Novus Ordo Holy Mass in 7 in the morning, it isn't Ad Orientum though. But in our parish communion is recieved only on tounge because of two substances. Our Polish prists are great) ❤❤❤
Was happy to hear Douglas Bushman STL mentioned at 2:29. He was my professor at the University of Dallas in the 90’s and besides being a Thomist extraordinaire he also cleared up for us all the nonsense circulating at the time about Vatican II. At the time “the spirit of Vatican II” line was bandied about to justify doing the exact opposite of what the Council actually taught.
At the religious community where I go to Mass, today we were in a different chapel, where the altar was against the wall, we had a Novus Ordo mass with the priest facing away. Perfectly fine
1:17:52 Regarding the (unaudible) readings in latin: I heard one explanation, that nowadays we tend to look at the readings from our present perspective and treat them like a lesson, educational aspect, that we need to hear and understand them and make some conclusions, but in the old mass they were more like a hymn of praise to God. The first readings often repeated, they were usually from the Book of Wisdom and depicted some aspects of Wisdom (and thus of God). Because of that, like the prayers, they didn't need to be heard by the people.
I don't fully agree with this explanation, I feel like it's more of a try to explain an error (neglecting the proclamation of the Word of God loud and clear enough) afterwards, but I also think that there is some truth in the idea that the readings are not only 'educational', but also have a value of prayer, God's Word becoming alive when it's proclaimed aloud in this exact moment and place.
This was AWESOME! Inspired me to get more involved at my church. God bless you both.
I've been looking for the words to describe what Dr DeClue said in this interview. It seems to me (and I'm by no means the interpreter of all things) that what we see today in terms of liturgical "chaos" is really a laying open of what was interiorly the case before VII. I would love to see a return to the TLM in the Roman Church (lex orandi, lex credendi after all) but I also am willing to believe that the Novus Ordo is meant to teach us a lesson, to help us to become a truly Catholic people who could be entrusted with the TLM. I suppose only time will tell.
Dr. DeClue get's it!
I’m far for an expert on why the priest started facing the people, I’ve heard the argument that it was because there was a lot lack of instruction, and so people took notes from how it was done in Saint Peter’s where the priest did face the people, however I do know that the reason for moving the altar from the wall, is so that it can be incensed from all sides as opposed to one, this probably is compounding on the distinction of the place of repose and the place of sacrifice. However, this is the argument I’ve heard of specifically., as it is an inspiration taken from the east, which was the inspiration behind much of the reforms in Sacrosanctum Concillium
It was to destroy the ancient liturgy and faith, it was a revolution
23:00 Archbishop Sheen's speech on the Antichrist in 1947 also mentions how pagan the Church is
If you have a link to it, that'd be interesting.
I think that if one looks at a country like Mexico (though my experience has been pretty limited), he could get an idea of what Ratzinger was talking about. There is lots of fuss about baptisms, first communions, and confirmations, but when it comes to fidelity, a lot of people really don't seem to be devout.
At least, that's my take from my limited perspective.
I appreciate Dr. DeClue’s perspective (always good to hear a variety of points of view), however I would challenge some of the general assertions he made on a few, particular topics. He gives the usual ‘spiel’ that I’ve heard from others before, and he does so quite well; however there are those who have claimed the opposite (at least on some points).
For example, Michael Davies, who was a champion of traditional Liturgy and orthodoxy, years ago, did an interview on the British tv program called, “Firing Line,”(in 1980) along with Malachi Martin (and another Priest from America from the state of New York who studied at Yale & Notre Dame); and Michael Davies showed that the liturgical changes which were forced upon the lay faithful of the time period, were not wanted or even received well by the majority of the laity (although it was presented as such). It was in fact, an enthusiastic project by a strong minority of clergy, against the wishes and desires of the overwhelming majority of the laity.
To be sure, there were those among the laity who welcomed and embraced the changes with enthusiasm, and these people were often the voices which were promoted, while ignoring the majority of voices who opposed the changes, however they were by far in the overwhelming minority.
You can find the particular episode of “Firing Line” with Michael Davies and Malachi Martin on RUclips if you care to watch it. It’s quite an interesting discussion.
Also look up, “The Ecumaniacs” on RUclips. Some very good information on that video as well.
He gives all the same canned answers we always get with no answers to tough questions other than “I’m not an expert”
What you said here doesn’t really contradict anything I said. In fact, I even said it was top down (regarding versus populum) because the people didn’t ask for it. I saw that firing line episode. But I am talking about the Council itself, what the documents actually say, and I explicitly say that a lot of what happened (especially regarding the Liturgy) was NOT what Sacrosanctum Concilium called for. I am not an expert on liturgical theology, so I don’t enter into much about questions about why or how the changes that were made were made. I’m merely pointing out where what happened didn’t follow the Council on several points.
@@decluesviews2740 Fair enough. Yet there are those who would argue that the documents themselves were deliberately formulated to be ambiguous, including Sacrosanctum Concilium. Fr. Anthony Cekada (who was a well known sedevacantist) produced some videos based on his book, “Work of Human Hands (regarding the New Mass). Have a watch and let me know what you think?