This is very helpful thank you! Is there any (asdoc) command that can make a table where both the descriptive statistics and correlation coefficients are shown in 1 table like in published articles? I couldn't find anything regarding this after using the help asdoc command...
@@SteffensClassroom I expected that. Do you know of any other commands that are able to make 1 table? I’ve only found commands who will create them separately :/
@@SteffensClassroom Actually I managed to find a command that does what I want. It's the "mkcorr" command. :) Thanks again for making these useful Stata videos
Thank you very much for the video! I want to use asdoc to create a summary table for mainly categorical variables, and to display the distinct categories, using "i.var" in the varlist. This works perfectly, yet when I want to use the variable labels with "label" this won't work. If I refrain from using the "i.var"-notation, the "label"-command works. Do you have any idea how I can combine both?
Morning! Thank you for the comment. I took a look at this, and couldn't find much about it at the first glance. Two things come to mind. 1) I am sure that you are aware of the work around, by splitting the categorical variable up into dummies. This can be done by for instance writing; tab var, gen(new_var). However, this does not solve it for the i.var issue that you want, but is more of a simple work-around. 2) You could avoid the label option all together, if you changed the value labels. Look at this example: sysuse nlsw88, clear asdoc sum ibn.industry i.race wage, replace abb( . ) Here you get a table which should look the way you like it to. Notice how the variables industry and race are set when you look at them in the data viewer. (The ibn. factor-variable operator specifies that a categorical variable should be treated as if it has no base, or, in other words, that all levels of the categorical variable are to be included in the model. The abb( . ) is to avoid the command shortening the names of your variables in the output table). I hope this helps!
@@SteffensClassroom Hi Steffen, thank you very much! For now I will go with variant 1, thank you for the hint. In scenario 2, I still have the variable name, not label, in the table, which I would like to avoid. Thank you again for responding so quickly!
@@Clara-n7s Hi again! If I understand correctly, for 2) you should try and construct the variable in the same way as in that example dataset I showed in my previous comment. I believe they are called value labels.
Hi Steffen, once again, thanks for your video! I have one question regarding summarizing/tabulating large panel data (that has been made long). Because my data is long now, it thinks that one company with 30 monthly stock returns now counts as 30 observations if I use tab. Do you know how to avoid this? Or should I just tab and make the descriptive table before reshaping my data?
You can do that, but in this case, you may want to use the xtsum command, which is more suitable for panel. Alternatively, you can also combine sum/tab with a 'by' command in order to create summary statistics per company. Wrt the asdoc command, you may want to check section 2.4 in the help file. I think that could help. Just my first thoughts. Hope this helps,
Thank a lot! anyway,, does it display categorical variables with central tendency number and percentage? di I have to specify the nature of categorical variable by writing i. before the name?
ook, thank you. the point is: is it possible to mix asdoc sum and asdoc tab and in order to have an automatically (without having to tell system which variable to tab cause it's categorical and viceversa for sum) set up table?
@@SteffensClassroom Oh, thanks, I didn't know that 'cd' changed the output folder for 'asdoc' as well. I thought I'd set it initially with the loading of the do-file. But I see it's working now. Thank you!
Thank you so much. Your videos are very helpful!
This is very helpful thank you! Is there any (asdoc) command that can make a table where both the descriptive statistics and correlation coefficients are shown in 1 table like in published articles? I couldn't find anything regarding this after using the help asdoc command...
Hi!
So far, I have unfortunately not found this with asdoc.
@@SteffensClassroom I expected that. Do you know of any other commands that are able to make 1 table? I’ve only found commands who will create them separately :/
@@RapMasterish I only have experience with asdoc, estout and outreg2. However, there should also be a new teable command that could be useful.
@@SteffensClassroom Actually I managed to find a command that does what I want. It's the "mkcorr" command. :) Thanks again for making these useful Stata videos
Thank you very much for the video! I want to use asdoc to create a summary table for mainly categorical variables, and to display the distinct categories, using "i.var" in the varlist. This works perfectly, yet when I want to use the variable labels with "label" this won't work. If I refrain from using the "i.var"-notation, the "label"-command works. Do you have any idea how I can combine both?
Morning! Thank you for the comment.
I took a look at this, and couldn't find much about it at the first glance. Two things come to mind.
1) I am sure that you are aware of the work around, by splitting the categorical variable up into dummies. This can be done by for instance writing; tab var, gen(new_var). However, this does not solve it for the i.var issue that you want, but is more of a simple work-around.
2) You could avoid the label option all together, if you changed the value labels. Look at this example:
sysuse nlsw88, clear
asdoc sum ibn.industry i.race wage, replace abb( . )
Here you get a table which should look the way you like it to. Notice how the variables industry and race are set when you look at them in the data viewer.
(The ibn. factor-variable operator specifies that a categorical variable should be treated as if it has no base, or, in other words, that all levels of the categorical variable are to be included in the model. The abb( . ) is to avoid the command shortening the names of your variables in the output table).
I hope this helps!
@@SteffensClassroom Hi Steffen, thank you very much! For now I will go with variant 1, thank you for the hint. In scenario 2, I still have the variable name, not label, in the table, which I would like to avoid. Thank you again for responding so quickly!
@@Clara-n7s Hi again! If I understand correctly, for 2) you should try and construct the variable in the same way as in that example dataset I showed in my previous comment. I believe they are called value labels.
Hi Steffen, once again, thanks for your video! I have one question regarding summarizing/tabulating large panel data (that has been made long). Because my data is long now, it thinks that one company with 30 monthly stock returns now counts as 30 observations if I use tab. Do you know how to avoid this? Or should I just tab and make the descriptive table before reshaping my data?
I want to put the countries of the firms in a table. Country is a string variable so sum doesn't work (for me at least)
You can do that, but in this case, you may want to use the xtsum command, which is more suitable for panel.
Alternatively, you can also combine sum/tab with a 'by' command in order to create summary statistics per company.
Wrt the asdoc command, you may want to check section 2.4 in the help file. I think that could help.
Just my first thoughts. Hope this helps,
And referring to the second part of your command. You can generate country variable that is numeric by using encode.
@@SteffensClassroom It worked, thanks a lot!
Fantastic! Happy to hear it worked out :)
Thank a lot! anyway,, does it display categorical variables with central tendency number and percentage? di I have to specify the nature of categorical variable by writing i. before the name?
Hi!
Do you mean a presentation like in this example?
sysuse nlsw88.dta
asdoc tab race married
You will se here that the i. prefix is not needed.
ook, thank you. the point is: is it possible to mix asdoc sum and asdoc tab and in order to have an automatically (without having to tell system which variable to tab cause it's categorical and viceversa for sum) set up table?
@@paolo4401 Ah I see what you mean.
I am actually uncertain if this is possible with asdoc. I haven't tried it out yet.
and in general with STATA is it possible? I can't do it by following tables of frequencies etc.. @@SteffensClassroom
@@paolo4401 I will need to look into a bit more. I have seen it done with asdocx, but there should be another way :)
I wonder how you get it where to place the files it creates. For me it chose the computer's default Documents folder, which I never use.
Hi!
You can set the current directory using the cd command :) There is a video on that on the Learning Stata playlist.
@@SteffensClassroom Oh, thanks, I didn't know that 'cd' changed the output folder for 'asdoc' as well. I thought I'd set it initially with the loading of the do-file. But I see it's working now. Thank you!
How can you install asdoc? On my desktop it is not installed
Hello Sofyan
You can install it by writing: ssc install asdoc
The ssc install command is the general command used for installing packages.
@@SteffensClassroom super thanks a lot I really appreciate your videos
@@sofyanbou7910 Thank you very much! If you have any suggestions for additional topics I can cover lmk :)