Police Violate 1st amendment rights at Twitch Con 2024

At twitch con 2024 San Diego police try using local law for sidewalk vending against protected speech/ The officers say I am not allowed there because f a vending ban, then their supervisor says I am allowed but my palm art is not. They also skipped over talking to the Jehovah's witnesses and went strait for the henna artist who is also protected speech but the police, said her art also was not protected speech. I informed her that a local law may not contradict a state law and if it does local law enforcement must keep state law. She said arguing with her is not the place. That its something to argue in court. In am going to file a complaint to the internal affairs and the citizens review board of police. I am also sending this to my lawyer.. Not only does the local ordinance violate 1st amendment rights, but it also violates state law SB946 See my art and order custom work at www.mindmagickcreations.com
Support me at / williamdorset
Follow me on Instagram at / williamjdorsett
check out my music at audiomack.com/...
Follow me on facebook at / mindmagickcreations
Get clothing, prints and music at my store www.mindmagick...
Learn more about your rights as a busker or artist here artistandbuske...

[@Govtflu]

Remind me again, who decides when rights are violated?

[@merlinawakend]

Well the courts have given a long list of things that are considered rights violations. for example, police aren't to make contact if there is no crime. (that is harassment.) 2 Police can't interview two 1st amendment rights, and skip one, because "they are obviously ok." that is selective enforcement. It steps over the 1st amendment and heavily violates the 14th amendment. Finnaly as a local judge has stated in a court case caselaw.findlaw.com/court/apl-div-sup-crt-cal-san-die-cou/116454075.html

[@merlinawakend]

as I was saying in the local courts the judge stated this about local ordinances, "Municipalities’ authority to make ordinances and regulations is governed under the California Constitution. “A county or city may make and enforce within its limits all local, police, sanitary, and other ordinances and regulations not in conflict with general laws.” (Cal. Const., art. XI, § 7.) “A conflict exists if the local legislation ‘ “duplicates, contradicts, or enters an area fully occupied by general law, either expressly or by legislative implication.” ’ ” (Sherwin-Williams Co. v. City of Los Angeles (1993) 4 Cal.4th 893, 897, 16 Cal.Rptr.2d 215, 844 P.2d 534.) If an ordinance “purport[s] to prohibit acts which already are made criminal by the Penal Code, it is clear that they exceed the proper limits of supplementary regulation and must be held invalid because in conflict with the statutes which they duplicate.” (In re Portnoy (1942) 21 Cal.2d 237, 240, 131 P.2d 1.)

[@merlinawakend]

also if you are well versed in these kinds of court cases for busking/ art and other self expression, its pretty easy to see a pattern of rights violations... Lookup depravation of rights under color of law.