WANT TO EASILY UNDERSTAND the Socionics DCNH model??? Read this condensed complete summary in plain English from pages 347 to 357 of Gulenko's "64 Types" book ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Why do people of the same Socionic type behave so differently? When 3-4 people of the same type gather to put together a puzzle, for example, some will be more active, others more passive, some more resourceful, and others more reserved, etc. With larger numbers of people an ever-wider variety of behaviors appear. Creating behavioral subtypes to the primary Socionic type. Yet unlike the Socionics primary type, behavioral subtypes are not static. But can change through a person's lifetime with sufficient internal motivation or pressures from unique life experiences. The Humanitarian Socionics School (HSS) have verified four to eight types of behavior within small group collective hierarchies. But for practical purposes (such as knowing what to look for when filling a leadership position) the DCNH subtype system is based on the following 4 functional subtypes with their primarily roles, associated attributes, and leading information elements (cognitive functions): • Dominant (Leader): Competitive; often recognized as the leader; sets clear objectives; ambitious (even when claiming the contrary); agrees only to temporary compromises with an eye on winning; acts decisively in complicated situations; has a high standard of performance; able to delegate responsibility; authoritarian but not in the details; communicates with a wide range of people while possessing only a small circle of close friends. (Reinforced through the linear-assertive functions Fe and Te. Fe energy resonates with Te engagement. Conversely, physical Te movements inevitably charges Fe emotions as well.) • Creative (generator of ideas): Change oriented; searches for new directions and allies; obsessed with originality; rebellious and individualistic; have the power of originality (and sometimes folly); pugnaciousness; ignores common standards; impulsive; dislikes following lengthy procedures. (Reinforced through the flexible-maneuvering (flexible-adaptive) functions Ne and Se. Ne (opportunities intuition) simultaneously resonates with Se (force sensing.)) • Normalizing (finisher): Accurate; compliant; disciplined; efficient; seeks routine work environments that require little flexibility or important decision making; patient; pays attention to detail; conservative; has a narrow circle of trusted friends. (Reinforced through the balanced-stable functions Ti and Fi. Ti (structural logic) as a set of formal rules is supported by Fi (relational ethics) which are guided by informal norms and traditions.) • Harmonizing (corrector): Externally calm looking yet easily embarrassed; anxiously hoping for the best; frugal and simple; emotionally sensitive, compliant; avoids conflict, irritable when feeling smothered; tolerant for the sake of habitual comfort; generous and able to empathize with the weak; allusive. (Reinforced through the receptive-adaptive functions Si and Ni. These functions are enhanced as pairs because they have similar energy. A state of Si (physical relaxation) activates the flight of Ni (imagination) and vice versa.) If the group has 3 people, instead of 4, then one person combines two roles. The most successful combined roles are leaders/idea generators, and finishers/harmonizers, since they are closer to energy. Although in real life many shades of Grey exist. When a small group is made up with different primary Socionic types, the DCNH subtype is primary and the person's primary type secondary in influencing what role each person will play within the social hierarchy. DCNH subtypes measured by the following 3 Polarities of situational behaviors: 1) Under stress and facing a direct challenge: Contact: Willing to accept it with vigor and excitement. (Dominant/creative) Distant: Distances themselves from confrontation to avoid freezing or losing a foothold. (Normalizing/harmonizing) 2) Projects and relationships: Terminal: Seeks closure, following through from start to the end, and streamlining. (Dominant/normalizing) Initial: Initiates and switches easily to a new activity, multitasking. (Creative/harmonizing) 3) External environmental changes: Connective: Reacts with a lot of sensitivity. (Dominant/harmonizing) Ignorative: Pays little attention (Creative/normalizing) Combining these three polarities, we get the following DCNH subtypes: • Contact, terminal, connective - dominant (D) • Contact, initial, ignorative - creative (C) • Distant, terminal, ignorative - normalizing • Distant, initial, connective - harmonizing (H) In real life there are lots of shades of grey between each of these polarities. Similar to how in MBTI a judger may at times act like stereotypical perceiver by not always having clear plans. (Terminal/Initial being similar to the judging/perceiving dichotomy.)
My apologies, I should have at least made a community announcement. Personal circumstance has been affecting the time that I have to record, but I'll try to get some new videos out soon.
@@brainsjourney4187 Merely shitposting, have a good one. Besides, quality and quantity seem to be VERY inversely proportional when it comes to typology channels. It would be a shame if another one degenerated into "How to Do Less Work at Work" and "Here's How I Used the Laws of Attraction to Get A Live-in Maid".
@@pianoofdoom Haha, I totally get what you mean. My main rule so far has been to keep consistent with the information output. If I can't do that, I'd rather not even upload.
I wish I had federal dollars to conduct a study of this magnitude
WANT TO EASILY UNDERSTAND the Socionics DCNH model???
Read this condensed complete summary in plain English from pages 347 to 357 of Gulenko's "64 Types" book
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Why do people of the same Socionic type behave so differently?
When 3-4 people of the same type gather to put together a puzzle, for example, some will be more active, others more passive, some more resourceful, and others more reserved, etc.
With larger numbers of people an ever-wider variety of behaviors appear. Creating behavioral subtypes to the primary Socionic type.
Yet unlike the Socionics primary type, behavioral subtypes are not static. But can change through a person's lifetime with sufficient internal motivation or pressures from unique life experiences.
The Humanitarian Socionics School (HSS) have verified four to eight types of behavior within small group collective hierarchies. But for practical purposes (such as knowing what to look for when filling a leadership position) the DCNH subtype system is based on the following 4 functional subtypes with their primarily roles, associated attributes, and leading information elements (cognitive functions):
• Dominant (Leader): Competitive; often recognized as the leader; sets clear objectives; ambitious (even when claiming the contrary); agrees only to temporary compromises with an eye on winning; acts decisively in complicated situations; has a high standard of performance; able to delegate responsibility; authoritarian but not in the details; communicates with a wide range of people while possessing only a small circle of close friends.
(Reinforced through the linear-assertive functions Fe and Te. Fe energy resonates with Te engagement. Conversely, physical Te movements inevitably charges Fe emotions as well.)
• Creative (generator of ideas): Change oriented; searches for new directions and allies; obsessed with originality; rebellious and individualistic; have the power of originality (and sometimes folly); pugnaciousness; ignores common standards; impulsive; dislikes following lengthy procedures.
(Reinforced through the flexible-maneuvering (flexible-adaptive) functions Ne and Se. Ne (opportunities intuition) simultaneously resonates with Se (force sensing.))
• Normalizing (finisher): Accurate; compliant; disciplined; efficient; seeks routine work environments that require little flexibility or important decision making; patient; pays attention to detail; conservative; has a narrow circle of trusted friends.
(Reinforced through the balanced-stable functions Ti and Fi. Ti (structural logic) as a set of formal rules is supported by Fi (relational ethics) which are guided by informal norms and traditions.)
• Harmonizing (corrector): Externally calm looking yet easily embarrassed; anxiously hoping for the best; frugal and simple; emotionally sensitive, compliant; avoids conflict, irritable when feeling smothered; tolerant for the sake of habitual comfort; generous and able to empathize with the weak; allusive.
(Reinforced through the receptive-adaptive functions Si and Ni. These functions are enhanced as pairs because they have similar energy. A state of Si (physical relaxation) activates the flight of Ni (imagination) and vice versa.)
If the group has 3 people, instead of 4, then one person combines two roles.
The most successful combined roles are leaders/idea generators, and finishers/harmonizers, since they are closer to energy. Although in real life many shades of Grey exist.
When a small group is made up with different primary Socionic types, the DCNH subtype is primary and the person's primary type secondary in influencing what role each person will play within the social hierarchy.
DCNH subtypes measured by the following 3 Polarities of situational behaviors:
1) Under stress and facing a direct challenge:
Contact: Willing to accept it with vigor and excitement. (Dominant/creative)
Distant: Distances themselves from confrontation to avoid freezing or losing a foothold. (Normalizing/harmonizing)
2) Projects and relationships:
Terminal: Seeks closure, following through from start to the end, and streamlining. (Dominant/normalizing)
Initial: Initiates and switches easily to a new activity, multitasking. (Creative/harmonizing)
3) External environmental changes:
Connective: Reacts with a lot of sensitivity. (Dominant/harmonizing)
Ignorative: Pays little attention (Creative/normalizing)
Combining these three polarities, we get the following DCNH subtypes:
• Contact, terminal, connective - dominant (D)
• Contact, initial, ignorative - creative (C)
• Distant, terminal, ignorative - normalizing
• Distant, initial, connective - harmonizing (H)
In real life there are lots of shades of grey between each of these polarities. Similar to how in MBTI a judger may at times act like stereotypical perceiver by not always having clear plans. (Terminal/Initial being similar to the judging/perceiving dichotomy.)
Geneticists need to study Socionics
>hopes we are excited for the new series
>doesn't make new series
What did he mean by this?
My apologies, I should have at least made a community announcement. Personal circumstance has been affecting the time that I have to record, but I'll try to get some new videos out soon.
@@brainsjourney4187 Merely shitposting, have a good one. Besides, quality and quantity seem to be VERY inversely proportional when it comes to typology channels. It would be a shame if another one degenerated into "How to Do Less Work at Work" and "Here's How I Used the Laws of Attraction to Get A Live-in Maid".
@@pianoofdoom Haha, I totally get what you mean. My main rule so far has been to keep consistent with the information output. If I can't do that, I'd rather not even upload.