According to Socionics 4-D model the strength of the role is 2/4 and the PolR a mere 1/4 (tied with suggestive for lowest.) Conversely we value the role only 1/4 (tied with the ignoring for least valued) but the PolR at 2/4. So overall the PolR and role are tied at a combined value/strength of 3/8. Tied for lowest overall. Because though we don't value the ignoring function we are actually good at it (3/4.) And though we are not good at the suggestive we highly value it (1/4) so are ready to make an effort at it.
According to Socionics 4-D model the strength of the role is 2/4 and the PolR a mere 1/4 (tied with suggestive for lowest.)
Conversely we value the role only 1/4 (tied with the ignoring for least valued) but the PolR at 2/4.
So overall the PolR and role are tied at a combined value/strength of 3/8. Tied for lowest overall.
Because though we don't value the ignoring function we are actually good at it (3/4.)
And though we are not good at the suggestive we highly value it (1/4) so are ready to make an effort at it.
Awesome video man!
Glad you've been enjoying them!
Great video man
We should just focus on 1-2-3 and outsource the 5-6
Maybe the man who approached me in a dark parking glot asking me about the water asked me if its salty was a hurt egoist
As an INTP (LII) I am bad at Se hence like many INTPs I'm a minimalist.
Awesome video man!